Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:43:02.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Yuzhi Shi
Yuzhi Shi
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Evolution of Chinese Grammar , pp. 558 - 574
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboh, Enoch. 2006. If we see focus, you go left and I go right! Paper presented at the International Conference on Bantu Grammar. SOAS, London.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn Jager and Allan, Collins. 1979. A schema-theoretic view of reading. In Freedle, Roy O. (ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 1–22. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith L. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68: 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albridge, Edith. 2010. Clause-internal wh- movement in Old Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoun, Joseph and Audrey, Y.-H. Li. 1993. Wh- elements in-situ: syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24: 199–238.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, Hornstein, Norbert, and Sportoche, Dominique. 1981. On some aspects of wide scope of quantification. Journal of Linguistics Research 13: 67–95.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. 1991. On diachronic sources and synchronic patterns: an investigation into the origin of linguistic universals. Language 67: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: the role of an abstract Q morpheme. Foundations of Language, 6: 197–219.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. 1995. The English language: a historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate and Theo, Vennemann. 1972. Semantic structures: a study in the relation between semantics and syntax. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum.Google Scholar
Barz, Richard and Anthony, Diller. 1985. Classifiers and standardisation: some South and South-East Asian comparisons. In Bradley, David (ed.), Language policy, language planning and sociolinguistics in South-East Asia, 155–184. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar
Beida, . 1995. Hanyu fangyan cihui (The dialect lexicon of Chinese). Beijing: Yuwen Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1999. Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: counting and beyond. In Gvozdanovic, Jadranka (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–185. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bouton, Lawrence F. 1973. Some reasons for doubting the existence of a passive transformation. In Kachru, Braj B., Lees, Robert B., Malkiel, Yakov, Pierangeli, Angelina, and Saporta, Sol (eds.), Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Rene Kahanée, 70–84. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. and Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon. 2015. Handbook of Korean linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1978. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2007. Wh- in-situ does not correlate with wh- indefinites or question particles. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 139–166.Google Scholar
Bussman, Hadumod. 1996. Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.). 1996. LFG-Workshop proceedings of the first LFG conference. Rank Xerox Research Centre, Grenoble, August.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 1995. The semantic development of past tense modals in English. In Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 503‒507. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602‒623. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2006. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2007. Diachronic linguistics. In Geeraerts, Dirl and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of construction. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Grameme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 49‒69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Beckner, Clay. 2015. Usage-based theory. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 827‒856. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Guangshun. 1986. Zutangji zhong di que le zhe (On the particles di, que, le and zhe in Zutangji). Zhongguo Yuwen 3: 192–202.Google Scholar
Cao, Guangshun 1995. Jindai Hanyu zhuci (Particles in Modern Chinese). Beijing: The Yuwen Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Guangshun and Xiaorong, Yu. 2000. Zhonggu yijing zhong de chuzhishi (The disposal construction in the translated sutras in Medieval Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 555–563.Google Scholar
Cao, Zhiyun (ed.). 2008. Hanyu fangyan dituji (yufa juan) (The maps of the Chinese dialects (grammar volume)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1965. Gujarati reference grammar. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, constrastiveness, definiteness, subject, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren 1979. Hanyu kouyu yufa (A grammar of spoken Chinese). Translated by Shuxiang, Lü. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Chen, Mengjia. 1956. Yinxu buci zongshu (A survey of Yin oracle bone inscriptions). Beijing: The Science Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhongmin. 2002. Lun Guangzhouhua xiaocheng biandiao de laiyuan (The origin of the tone sandhi of the diminutive in Cantonese). In Pan Wuyan (ed.), Dongfang yuyanxue (Eastern linguistics), 167–181. Shanghai: The Eastern Publisher.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 1991. On the typology of wh- questions. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 2003. Wh- in-situ. Glot International 7: 103–109.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. and Huang, James C.-T. 1996. Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 4: 121–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., James Huang, C.-T, Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Jane Tang, C.-C.. 1993. Three ways to get passive. MS, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rooryck, Johan. 2002. Types of wh- in-situ. MS, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Samuel H.-N. 1977. Perfect particles in the Bian Wen language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5: 55‒74.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998a. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter.” In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and grammar (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 70), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro 1998b. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–351.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chu, Zexiang, Jingsheng, Liu, Guofu, Long, Hui, Tian, Guilin, Ye, and Xianzhang, Zheng. 1997. Hanyu cunzaiju de lishixing kaocha (A diachronic investigation of the existential sentences in Chinese). Gu Hanyu Yanjiu (Studies in Classical Chinese) 4: 13–20.Google Scholar
Clark, John and Yallop, Colin. 1992. An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike. 1985. Zur entstehung von genussystemen: Überlegungen zu einigen theoretischen aspekten, verbunden mit einer fallstudie des zande. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 1: between the grammar and physics of speech, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter and Hermon, Gabriella. 1998. The typology of wh- movement: wh- questions in Malay. Syntax 1: 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1988. Topics, grammaticalized topics, and subjects. In Axmaker, Shelley, Jaisser, Annie and Singmaster, Helen (eds.), General session and parasession on grammaticalization, 265–279. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2004. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1976. An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 41–87.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word 45:145–171.Google Scholar
Croft, William 1995. Intonation units and grammatical knowledge. Linguistics 33: 838–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William 1996. Typology and universals (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William 2001. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th edition). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Qingxia. 1998. Zang Mian yuzu yuyan yanjiu (Studies in the Tibetan-Burmese language family). Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical-functional grammar (Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 34). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2014. Questions and the vP phase in Hindi–Urdu. MS, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Serial verb constructions. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, 799–925. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2018. Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Alexandra Aikhenvald, Y. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999a. Demonstratives: form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger 1999b. The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger 2006. Demonstratives. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 430‒435. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1980. Studies in functional grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ding, Shengshu. 1935. Shi foudingci “fu,” “bu” (An explanation of the negative markers fu and bu). Qingzhu Cai Yuanpei xiansheng liushiwu sui lunwenji (A paper collection in celebration of Cai Yuanpei at the age of sixty-five), 967–996. Beijing: Guoli Zhongyang Yanjiu Yuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo.Google Scholar
Ding, Shengshu, Shuxiang, Lü, Rong, Li, Dexuan, Sun, Xiechu, Guan, Jing, Fu, Shengzhang, Huang, and Zhiwen, Chen. 1961. Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua (Lectures on modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Djamouri, Redouane and Waltraud, Paul. 1997. Les syntagmes prépositionnels en yu et zai en chinois archaïque. Cahiers de linguistique-Asie orientale 26: 221–248.Google Scholar
Dong, Hongyuan. 2009. Issues in the semantics of Mandarin questions. Doctoral dissertation. Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. SVO languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68: 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2003. Word order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographic perspective. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy (eds.), Sino-Tibetan languages, 43–55. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Relationship between the order and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 390–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Word order. In Shopen, Tomonthy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I. Clause structure, 61–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2007. The phonology of Standard Mandarin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia and Irurtzun, Aritz. 2014. From obligatory wh- movement to optional wh- in-situ in Labourdin Basque. Language, 90: e1–e28.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques. 1990. Generative and non-linear phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1979. Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic and pragmatic principles as arguments in the interpretation of runic inscriptions. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical linguistics and philology, 165–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2017. Partial movement. In Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 437–492. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feng, Chuntian. 1990. Shilun jiegou zhuci “di (de)” de yixie wenti (Some issues on the structural particle “di(de)”). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 448–453.Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 1996. Prosodically constrained syntactic change in Early Archaic Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 323‒371.Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli 2014. Historical syntax of Chinese. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 537–575. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1987. From verb to anaphora. Lingua 72: 155–168.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt 1995. On sources of demonstratives and anaphors. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora, 169‒203. Amsterdm: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1979. Parsing and constraints on word order. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5: 177–198.Google Scholar
Gao, Ming. 1987. Zhongguo guwenzixue tonglun (A Conspectus of Chinese ancient characters). Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert. 2007. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1984. Syntax: a functional–typological introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1990. Syntax: a functional–typological introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of “event”: grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In Traugott, Elizabeth and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia Elizabeth. 1997. Phonology with ternary scales. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966a. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) Universals of languages (2nd edition), 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph (ed.) 1966b. Universals of language (2nd edition). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson and Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Greenberg, Ferguson, Charles A. and Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.). 1978. Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane and Mester, Armin. 1988. Light verbs and θ-marking. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 205–232.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, Xiliang. 1997. Guanyu xici “shi” chansheng de shidai he laiyuan de jidian renshi (The date and source of the copula shi revisited). In Hanyu shi lunwen ji (A collection of papers on historical Chinese linguistics), 106–123. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural syntax: iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J.. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression. In Kayne, Richard, Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Leu, Thomas (eds.), An annotated syntax reader: lasting insights and questions, 312–327. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Mantaro. 1976. Language diffusion on the Asian continent. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages 3: 49–65.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Mantaro 1984. The Altaicization of northern Chinese, MS, National Inter-university Research Institute of Asian and African Languages and Cultures, U.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1984. Modifier–head or function–argument relations in phrase structure? Lingua 63: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 1990. Notes on the Aari language. In Hayward, Richard J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, 425–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
He, Wei. 1989. Huojia fangyan yanjiu (A study in the Huojia dialect). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
He, Wei 2004. Zuozhuan xuci yanjiu (Studies on the functional words of the Zuo Zhuan). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
He, Wei 2005. Shi Ji yufa tedian yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the Shi Ji). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
He, Wei 2007. Hanyu yufashi duandai zhuanshu bijiao yanjiu (A comparative approach to the history of Chinese grammar with special reference to particular books in different periods). Kaifeng: Henan University Press.Google Scholar
He, Wei 2012. Zuozhuan yufa yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the Zuo Zhuan). Kaifeng: Henan University Press.Google Scholar
Heffner, Roe-Merrill S. 1950. General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, and Friederike, Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania 2007. The genesis of grammar: a reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko. 2011. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predicate: theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintzman, Douglas L. 1986. “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93: 411–428.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M., Blake, Norman, Lass, Roger, Romaine, Suzanne, Burchfield, Robert, and Algeo, John. 2001. The Cambridge history of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and creoles, Vol. 3: Theory and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia. 1986. Focus in the theory of grammar and the structure of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hu, Chirui. 2005. Dongjie shi de zao qi xingshi jiqi panding biaozhun (The earliest forms of the resultative construction and the criteria for judging them). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 214‒225.Google Scholar
Hu, Yushu (eds.). 1981. Xiandai hanyu (Modern Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Huang, Borong (ed.). 1996. Hanyu fangyan yufa leibian (The classification collection of the grammars of the Chinese dialects). Qingdao: The Qingdao Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Dinghua. 1963. Minnan fangyan li de yiwen daici (Interrogative pronouns in the southern Min dialect), Zhongguo yuwen 4: 299–307.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T. 1994. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 45‒48. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3: 45–89.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T. 2006. The macro-history of Chinese syntax and the theory of change. Invited lecture presented at Workshop on Chinese Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H, and Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Simpson, Andrew. 2014. The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Huang, Nansong. 1994. Shilun duanyu zizhu chengju suoying jubei de ruogan yufa fanchou (On the grammatical categories of determining clauses as independent sentences). Zhongguo yuwen 6: 441–447.Google Scholar
Huang, Shuan-Fan. 1978. Historical change of prepositions and the emergence of SOV order. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6: 212–242.Google Scholar
Huang, Xiaohui. 1992. Xiandai Hanyu chabi geshi de laiyuan ji yanbian (The origin and development of the superior comparative construction in Modern Chinese). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 213–224.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1992. So-called “double objects” and grammatical relations. Language 68: 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der. 1984. Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. and Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman and Waugh, Linda R.. 1979. The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 1996. Question-word movement to focus and scrambling in Malayalam. Linguistic Analysis, 26: 63–83.Google Scholar
Jenks, Peter. 2018. Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 49: 501–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jiang, Lansheng. 1989. Beidong guanxici “chi” de laiyuan chutan (A basic study of the lexical source of the passive morpheme “chi”). Zhongguo yuwen 5: 370–377.Google Scholar
Jiang, Lansheng 1995. Shuo “me” yu “men” tongyuan (On the same origin of “me” and “men”). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 259–273.Google Scholar
Jiang, Lansheng 1999a. Chusuo ci de lingge yongfa yu jiegou zhuci “di” de youlai (The genitive usage of locative words and the origin of the structural particle “di”). Zhongguo yuwen 2: 83–93.Google Scholar
Jiang, Lansheng 1999b. Cong yuyan shentou kan Hanyu binishi de fazhan (The development of analogy in the Chinese language as seen from language infiltration). Zhongguo shehui kexue (Social sciences in China) 4: 169–179.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shaoyu. 2005a. “Gei” ziju, “jiao” ziju biao beidong de laiyuan (The lexical sources of the passive morphemes “gei” and “jiao”). Yuyanxue luncong (Linguistic studies) 1: 159–177.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shaoyu 2005b. Jindai Hanyu yanjiu gaiyao (A survey of research on Modern Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shaoyu and Guangshun, Cao. 2005. Jindai Hanyu yufa shi yanjiu zongshu (A survey of studies about grammar of Modern Chinese). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. and Postal, Paul M.. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayser, Alois (eds.). 1993. Nauru grammar. Yarralumla and Canberra: Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985a. Passive in the world’s languages. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 243–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985b. Relative clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic Description, Vol. 2, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard. 1979. Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 333–351.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van and Los, Bettelou (eds.). 2006. The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van and Vincent, Nigel (eds.). 1997. Parameter of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kidwai, Ayesha. 2000. XP Adjunction in universal grammar: scrambling and binding in Hindi/Urdu. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic inquiry 10: 421‒41.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1992. Analogy. In Brown, Keith (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 56‒61. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 2011. Grammaticalization as optimization. In Jonas, Diane, Whitman, John, and Garrett, Andrew (eds.), Grammatical change: origins, nature, outcomes, 14–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 2013. Towards a null theory of the passive. Lingua 125: 7–33.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert S. 1976. On the subject of pseudo-passives in Standard Dutch and the semantics of background agents. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 387–415. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kong, Lingda. 1994. Yingxiang Hanyu juzi zizhu de yuyan xingshi (The linguistic forms affecting the independence of the sentence in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 434–440.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jacklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko, and Rhee, Seongha. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja and Pahta, Päivi. 2016. The handbook of English historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1971. Passive resistance. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 149–162.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1982. Space grammar, analyzability, and the English passive. Language 58: 22–80.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. Usage-based model. In Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics, 127–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1994. Conceptual grouping and constituency in cognitive grammar. Linguistics in the Morning Calm 3: 149–172.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of cognitive linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langendonck, Willy van. 2007. Iconicity. In Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 394–418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1976. English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lassadi, Boutheina. 2003. Optional wh- movement in French and Egyptian Arabic. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa, 31: 67–93.Google Scholar
Lehman, Winfred P. 1973. A structure principle of language and its implications. Language 49:42–66.Google Scholar
Lehman, Winfred P. 1978. The great underlying ground-plans. In Lehman, Winfred P. (ed.), Syntactic typology, 3–55. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1990. Wiping the slate clean: a lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41: 123–155.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Li, Audrey Y. H. and Shi, Yuzhi. 2000. Hanyu liangci xitong de jianli yu fushu biaoji “men” de fazhan (The establishment of the classifier system and the development of the plural “-men”). Contemporary Linguistics 2: 27–36.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. (eds.). 1975. Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1977. Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1974. Historical change of word order: a case study in Chinese and its implications. In Anderson, John M. and Jones, Charles (eds.), Historical linguistics, 199–217. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1977. A mechanism for the development of copula morpheme. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Mechanism of syntactic change, 419–444. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Yuzhi, Shi. 1997. Lun Hanyu tibiaoji dansheng de jizhi (On the mechanism for the emergence of aspect markers in Chinese). Zhongguo yuwen 2: 82–96.Google Scholar
Li, Fanggui. 1993. Certain phonetic influences of the Tibetan prefixes upon the root initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy 49: 15–36.Google Scholar
Li, Ping. 1987. Shi shuo xin yu he Bai yu jing zhong de dongbu jiegou (The resultative construction in Shi shuo xin yu and Bai yu jing). Yuyanxue luncong 14: 129–157.Google Scholar
Li, Rulong. 2001. Hanyu fangyanxue (The dialectology of Chinese).Beijing: The High Education Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xinkui, Jiajiao, Huang, Qisheng, Shi, Yun, Mai, and Dingfang, Chen. 1995. Guangzhou fangyan yanjiu (Research on the Guangzhou dialect). Guangzhou: Guangdong renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping and Bisang, Walter. 2012. Classifiers in sinitic languages: from individuation to definiteness marking. Lingua 122: 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yafei. 1993. Structural head and aspectuality. Language 69: 480–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yin. 2018. The diachronic development of the Chinese passive: from the wei … suo passive to the long passive. Language 94: e74–e98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yuming. 1996. Lingshu guanxi yu shuangbinju fenxi (Genitive relation and the analysis of the ditransitive construction). Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu (Language Teaching and Research), 3: 62–73.Google Scholar
Li, Zhenhua and Changji, Zhou. 1999. Hanzi gujin yinbiao (Phonological dictionary of Chinese characters from ancient to modern). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Light, Timothy. 1979. Word order and word order change in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7: 149–180.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 2013. Grammatical approaches to syntactic change. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 495–508. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lin, Jonah T.-H. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Lin, Jonah T.-H. 2014. Light verbs. In Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 73–99. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh- phrase quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang 2014. Wh- expressions in Mandarin Chinese. In Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 180–207. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Sue. 2018. Zaoqi Wuyu zhishici “ge” (The demonstrative “ge” in the Early Wu dialect). Fangyan 2: 221–230.Google Scholar
Lipák, Anikó. 2002. On the syntax of wh- items in Hungarian. Glot International 6: 293–301.Google Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard. 1990. An outline of English lexicology: Lexical structure, word Semantics, and word-formation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Liu, Jian and Shaoyu, Jiang. 1990. Jindai Hanyu yufa ziliao huibian (Tang Wudai juan) (A collection of grammatical material (from the Tang to the Five Dynasties)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Liu, Jian and Shaoyu, Jiang 1992. Jindai Hanyu yufa ziliao huibian (Songdai juan) (A collection of grammatical material (Song dynasty)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Liu, Jian and Shaoyu, Jiang 1995. Jindai Hanyu yufa ziliao huibian (Yuan Ming juan) (A collection of grammatical material (Yuan and Ming dynasties)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Liu, Linjun. 2009. A cognitive approach to topic constructions in Beijing Mandarin. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua, Wenyu, Pan, and Gu, Ye. 2001. Shiyong xiandai Hanyu yufa (Practical Modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 1999. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 267–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Carol Diabe. 1989. Syntactic reanalysis in the historical development of serial verb constructions in languages of West Africa. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol Diabe. 1993. Historical change in serial verb constructions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: The John Benjiamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming. 1988. Xiandai Hanyu zhong shuliangci de zuoyong (The function of classifiers in Contemporary Chinese). In Jianming, Lu (ed.), Xiandai Hanyu Jufa lun (On the syntax of Contemporary Chinese), 120–134. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1963. Xiandai Hanyu danshuang yinjie wenti chutan (An approach on monosyllabic and disyllabic words in Modern Chinese). Zhongguo yuwen 1: 10–22.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang 1979. Xiandai Hanyu yufa yanjiu Wenti (Issues in research on Modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang 1984. Hanyu yufa lunwenji (Collected papers on Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang 1985. Jindai hanyu zhidaici (Pronominal words in Modern Chinese). Shanghai: The Xuelin Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). 1999. Xiandai hanyu babai ci (The eight hundred words of Contemporary Chinese). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 2000. Systems of nominal classification: a concluding discussion. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 326–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhen and Jianming, Lu. 1996. Xingrongci zuo jieguo buyu qingkuang kaocha (An investigation into the resultative uses of adjectives). Hanyu xuexi 1: 3–7.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Graham and Blake, Barry. 1981. Language typology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willy. 1980. Ikonismus in der Morphologie. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 2: 19–37.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willy 1988. Morphological naturalness. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsulin. 1980. Sisheng bieyi de shijian cengci (The history of the tone shifts in differentiating meanings). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 427–443.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsulin 1981. Xiandai Hanyu wanchengmao jushi he ciweide laiyuan (The origin of the perfective aspect construction and the perfect suffix in Modern Chinese). Yuyan yanjiu 1: 65–77.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsulin 1988. Ciwei “di,” “de” de laiyuan (The origin of the suffixes “di” and “de”). Shiyusuo jikan (The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy) 1: 141–172.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsulin 1991. Cong Handai de dong sha dong si lai kan dongbu jiegou fazhan – jian lun zhonggu shiqi de shishou guanxi de zhongli hua (The historical development of the verb–resultative construction, with a note on the neutralization of the pre-verbal agent/patient distinction in Medieval Chinese). Yuyanxue luncong 16: 112–36.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg, Joseph (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 4, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 2010. Explaining language universals. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 66–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2006. Copula sentences. In Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol. 2, 1–23. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mycock, Louise. 2007. Constituent question formation and focus: a new typological perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 105: 192–251.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14: 177–202.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohta, Tatsuo. 1987. Zhongguoyu lishi wenfa (The historic grammar of Chinese). Translated by Shaoyu, Jiang and Tianhua, Xu. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Insun. 1992. Constituency problems in the auxiliary verb construction in Burmese. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth Annual International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Parker, Stephen G. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955. Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1974. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1 and 2: Principles of philosophy and elements of logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 38: 157‒189.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1986. History of the passive constructions in Chinese until the 10th century. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17: 335–372.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain 1997a. On word order and word order change in Pre-archaic Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 4: 105‒124.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain 1997b. On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale 26.1: 3‒20.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain 2017. Periodization. In Sybesma, Rint, Bether, Wolfgang, Yueguo, Gu, Zev Handel, C. T. Huang, James, and Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Vol. 5, 346–349. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pike, Eunice. 1954. Phonetic rank and subordination in consonant patterning and historical change. Miscellanea phonetica 2: 25–41.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1979. Exklusivierung, reflexivierung, identifizierrung, relationale Auszeichnung zu einem semantisch-pragmatischen thema. In Inger Rosengren (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik Lunder Symposium, 330–54. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Nairong. 1997. Shanghaihua yufa (The grammar of the Shanghai dialect). Shanghai: The Shanghai People Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Nairong 2014. Shanghai fangyan dingzhi zhishici “ge” (The definite demonstrative “ge” in the Shanghai dialect). Fangyan 1: 14–20.Google Scholar
Qiao, Quansheng. 2000. Jin fangyan yufa yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the Jin dialect). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L. 2003. The comparative method. In Joseph, Brian D. and Richard, D Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 183–212. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, Robert R. 2005. Bukhara Arabic: a metatypized dialect of Arabic in Central Asia. In Csató, É. Á., Isaksson, B., and Jahani, C. (eds.), Linguistic convergence and diffusion: case studies from Iranian, Semitic, and Turkic, 141–159. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rimé, Bernard, Philippot, Pierre, and Cisamolo, Daniela. 1990. Social schemata of peripheral changes in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 38–49.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saeed, John I. 1987. Somali reference grammar. Wheaton: Dunwoody.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1973. Focus and relativization. Language 49: 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.), Language sound structure: studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students, 107–136. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 1996. Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serruys, Paul L.-M. 1981. Toward a grammar of the Shang bone inscriptions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Chinese Studies, 313–364. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Shao, Jingmin. 1996. Xiandai Hanyu yiwenju yanjiu (Studies in interrogative sentences in modern Chinese). Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe (The Eastern China Normal University Press).Google Scholar
Shao, Jingmin and Chunli, Zhao. 2005. Zhishi ba ziju he shengyin bei ziju jiqi yuyong jieshi (The causative disposal construction and absent passive construction: a pragmatic approach). Hanyu xuexi 4: 11–18.Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2006. “Wang Mian sile fuqin” de shengcheng fangshi (The derivation of “Wang Mian died his father”). Zhongguo yuwen 4: 291–300.Google Scholar
Shi, Youwei. 1984. Guanyu “dong + you” (On the “verb + have” construction). Yuyanxue luncong 13: 13–25.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi. 1995. Lun Hanyu de dayinjie jiegou (On the structure of macro-syllables in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 3: 230–240.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi 2002a. The establishment of Modern Chinese grammar: the formation of the resultative construction and its effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi 2002b. Liangci, zhishi daici he jiegou zhuci (Classifier, demonstrative, and structural particle). Fangyan 2: 117‒126.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi 2004. Han Ying shuangbin jiegou chabie de gainianhua yuanyin (The motivation of conceptualization for the differences in double-object construction between Chinese and English). Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu (Foreign Language Teaching and Research) 36: 83–89.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi 2010. Hanyu yufa (Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi 2016. Hanyu yufa yanhuashi (The evolutionary history of Chinese grammar). Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi and Li, Charles N.. 1998. Lun zhuci “zhi” “zhe” he “de” de xingti (The rise and decline of the structural particles “zhi,” “zhe” and “de”). Zhongguo shehui kexue (Social Sciences in China) 6: 165–180.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi and Li, Charles N. 2001. Hanyu yufanhua de licheng (A history of grammaticalization in Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–848.Google Scholar
Shimura, Rioji. 1967. Chugo Hango no gobo to goi (A grammar of Medieval Chinese). In Tokuji, Ushijima et al. (eds.), Chugoku bunka sosho 1 (Series on Chinese culture, Vol. 1), 212–241. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy (eds.). 1985. Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The passive. a comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna 1991. Functional grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2017. Bare classifier/noun alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) variety of Chinese and the encoding of definiteness. Linguistics 55: 305–331.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew and Bhattacharya, Tanmoy. 2003. Obligatory overt wh- movement in a wh- in-situ language. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 127–142.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew and Biswas, Priyanka. 2016. Bare nominals, classifiers, and the representation of definiteness in Bangla. Linguistic Analysis 40: 167–198.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Soh, Hooi Ling, and Nomoto, Hiroki. 2011. Bare classifiers and definiteness. Studies in Language 35:168–193.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1981. Consistency, markedness and language change: on the notion “consistent language.” Journal of Linguistics 17: 39–54.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung (eds.). 2010. The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Wenhui, Zhengjing, Luo, and Jingchao, Yu. 2007. Xiandai Hanyu beidong ju shishi yinxian de jiliang fenxi (A quantitative analysis of the presence and absence of agents in the passives of Contemporary Chinese). Zhuoguo yuwen 2: 114–124.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1995. Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell Pulishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 2002. Typologie des argumentlinkings: Ӧkonomie und Expressivität. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen and Talmy, Givón. 1985. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: a quantified text study and its implications. Language, 61: 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Xixin. 1997. Hanyu lishi yufa conggao (A collection of papers on historical Chinese grammar). Shanghai: Hanyu dacidian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. 1985. Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In Haiman, John (eds.), Iconicity in syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Yuming. 1987. Han Wei Liuchao beidongshi luolun (A basic study on the passives of the Han, the Wei, and the Six Dynasties). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 216–222.Google Scholar
Tang, Yuming 1988. Tang zhi Qing de beidongju (Passives from the Tang Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty). Zhongguo yuwen 6: 459–468.Google Scholar
Tang, Yuming and Xifu, Zhou. 1985. Shilun Qin–Han beidongshi de fazhan (On the development of the passive in the Qin and Han dynasties). Zhongguo yuwen 4: 281–285.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Longacre, Robert. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2, 171–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1982. From propositional to textual meanings: some semantic and pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics,245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1994. Grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Brown, Keith (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 1481–1486. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1997. Lexicalization and gramaticalization. MS, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18: 523–557.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2011. Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 44–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth and Heine, Bernd. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut. 1996. Sound symbolism in deictic words. Paper presented at Fonetik 96, Swedish Phonetics Conference, Nässlingen, May.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.). 2008. Constructional approaches to English grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-Fu. 1990. Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: a functional perspective. Taipei: Student Books.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko. 1999. The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Analogy in generative grammar: the origin of word order. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguistics, Bologna, 79–83.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1976. Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. In Juilland (ed.), Alphone, Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 615–634. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1979. Word order and grammatical theory. In Meisel, Jürgen M and Pam, Martin D. (eds.), Linear order and generative theory, 1‒22. Amsterdam: John Benjiamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Voisin, Sylvie and Vittrant, Alice. 2012. Pluriactionnalité temporelle en birman et wolof: les cas de repetition extrême. Bulletin de la Société linguistique de Paris 107.1: 353–377.Google Scholar
Wahba, Wafaa A.-F. B. 1991. LF movement in Iraqi Arabic. In James, C.-T. Huang and May, Robert (eds.), Logical structure and linguistic structure, 253–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Wang, Guosheng. 1991. Daye Jinhu hua de “de”, “ge” he “de ge” (The particles “de,” “ge” and “de-ge”). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 211–215.Google Scholar
Wang, Li. 1943(1985). Zhongguo xiandai yufa (Modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuanguan.Google Scholar
Wang, Li 1980. Hanyu shigao (A history of the Chinese language). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Wang, Li 1978. Tongyuan zi lun (On cognates in Chinese). In Yuyanxue lunwen ji of Wang Li (The collected linguistic papers of Wang Li), 533–546. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Li 1989. Hanyu yufa shi (The history of Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshu Guan.Google Scholar
Wang, Li (ed.). 1997. Tongyuan zidian (A dictionary of Chinese cognates). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Tongshang and Yuzhi, Shi. 2019. Jindai Hanyu “chi” zi beidongju xingshuai de yuanyin (The motivations for the rise and decline of the “eat” passive in Modern Chinese). Gu hanyu yanjiu (Research on the Ancient Chinese Language) 2: 40–50.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y. and Sun, Chaofen (eds.). 2015. The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh- in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Watters, John. 1979. Focus in Aghem. In Hyman, L. (ed.), Aghem grammatical structure (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7), 138–189. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Wei, Pei-chuan. 1999. Lun xianqin hanyu yunfu de weizhi (On positions of the operator in Old Chinese). In Peyraube, A. and Chaofen, S. (eds.), Linguistic essays in honor of Mei Tsu-Lin: studies on Chinese historical syntax and morphology, 259–297. Paris: École des hautes études en sciences sociales.Google Scholar
Woodworth, Nancy. 1991. Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics 29: 273–299.Google Scholar
Wu, Fuxiang. 2003. Zai lun chuzhi shi de laiyuan (On the source of the disposal construction). Yuyan yanjiu 3. 1–14.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunji. 2000. Hunan fangyan de daici (Pronominal words in Hunan Province). Changsha: Hunan Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 1997. Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter 2006. Argument hierarchy and other factors determining argument realization. In Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., Comrie, B., and Friederici, A. D. (eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, Typological, and Psycholinguistic Perspectives, 1–25. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Xu, Dan. 2006. Typological change in Chinese syntax. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Jialu (ed.). 1995. Wenbai duizhao zhuzi jicheng (The translation of famous ancient books into Contemporary Chinese). Guangxi: Guangxi Education Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Jie. 1999. Liangzhong baoliu binyu jushi ji xiangguan jufa lilun (Two constructions of preserving objects and the related theories). Contemporary Linguistics 1:16–29.Google Scholar
Xu, Jie 2004. Yuyishang de Tongzhi Guanxi yu Jufashang de Shuangbinyu Jushi (The semantic relationship of co-reference and the syntactic construction of double objects). Zhongguo yuwen 4: 302–313.Google Scholar
Xu, Jie and Ying-Che., Li 1993. Focus and two non-linear grammatical categories: negation and question. Zhongguo yuwen 3: 81–92.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 2015. Topic prominence. In Wang, William S.-Y. and Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 393–404. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong and Langendeon, Terence. 1985. Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61: 1–27.Google Scholar
Yan, Sen. 1993. Lichuan yangyan yanjiu (Studies in the Lichuan dialect). Beijing: The Social Science Document Publisher.Google Scholar
Yang, Bojun. 1981. Gu Hanyu Xuci (Functional words in Classic Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Yang, Bojun and Leshi, He. 2001. Guhanyu yufa jiqi fazhan (The grammar of Classical Chinese and its development). Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yang, Chengkai. 1996. Hanyu yufa lilun yanjiu (Studies in Chinese grammar theory). Shenyang: Liaoning Education Press.Google Scholar
Ye, Guoquan and Zhidong, Tang. 1982. Xinyi fangyan de bianyin (The tone sandhi in the Xinyi dialect). Fangyan (Dialect) 1: 47–51.Google Scholar
Yen, Sian L. 1986. The origin of the copula shi in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 14.2: 227–241.Google Scholar
Yuan, Jiahua. 2001. Hanyu fangyan gaiyao (A survey of Chinese dialects). Beijing: Philology Press.Google Scholar
Yue, Anne O. 1998. Zhi in pre-Qin Chinese. T’oung pao 84.4‒5: 239‒292.Google Scholar
Yue, Anne O. 2015. The Yue language. In William, S.-Y. Wang and Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, 173–188. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne. 1993. The lexicon in syntactic change: lexical diffusion in Chinese syntax. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2: 213–254.Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne 1995. Guangdong Kaiping fangyan de “de” zi jiegou (The “de” construction in the Kingping subdialect of Cantonese). Zhongguo yuwen, 4: 289–297.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1988. Sonority constraints on prosodic structure. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University .Google Scholar
Zhang, Bojiang. 2001. Lun “ba” ziju de jushi yuyi (On the meaning of the “ba” construction). Language Research 1: 28–40.Google Scholar
Zhang, Bojiang 2006. Guanyu “suoqu lei shuangbinyu” (On the so-called “take”-type double object). Yuyanxue luncong 33: 298–312.Google Scholar
Zhang, Huiying. 1997. Hanyu fangyan daici yanjiu (Studies on pronominal words in Chinese dialects). Fangyan 2: 88–96.Google Scholar
Zhang, Huiying 2001. Hanyu fangyan daici yanjiu (Studies in pronominal words in Chinese dialects). Beijing: The Yuwen Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ning. 1998. The interactions between construction meaning and lexical meaning. Linguistics 36: 957–980.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yujin. 2001. Xizhou Hanyu yufa yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the West Zhou Dynasty). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Zhou, Chiming. 1958. Hanyu de shidongxing fuhe dongci (Causative verb compounds in Chinese). Wen shi zhe 4: 175–226.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa jiangyi (Lecture notes on grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi 1983. Zizhi he zhuanzhi: Hanyu mingcihua miaoji “de, zhě, suǒ he zhī” de yufa gongneng he yuyi gongneng (Self-referred and other-referred: the grammatical and semantic functions of the four nominalizers “de, zhě, suǒ and zhī”). Fangyan [Dialects] 1: 16–31.Google Scholar
Zhu, Minche. 1958. Xianqing liang Han shiqi de dongbu jiegou (The resultative construction in the period of Pre-Qin and Two Hans). Yuyanxue Luncong Vol. 2, 17–30. Shanghai: Xinzhi chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhu, Minche 1990. Zhuzi yulei zhong de dongci buyu – jian tan dongci houzhui (The resultative constructions and verbal particles in Zhuzi yulei). In Wang Li xiansheng jinian lunwen ji (A collection off papers in honor of Wang Li), 240‒251. Beijing: Shangwu yinshu guan.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2013. The sounds of language: an introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1982. Stranded to and phonological phrasing in English. Linguistics 20: 3‒57.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Yuzhi Shi, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Evolution of Chinese Grammar
  • Online publication: 16 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921831.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Yuzhi Shi, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Evolution of Chinese Grammar
  • Online publication: 16 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921831.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Yuzhi Shi, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Evolution of Chinese Grammar
  • Online publication: 16 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921831.023
Available formats
×