Book contents
- Everyday Justice
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Everyday Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter One Theorizing Everyday Justice
- Part One Im/possibilities of Everyday Justice
- Part Two The Force of Everyday Justice
- Chapter Four ‘We don’t work for the Serbs, we work for human rights’
- Chapter Five The Enduring Transition
- Part Three Everyday Justice Unbound
- Afterword
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Chapter Four - ‘We don’t work for the Serbs, we work for human rights’
Justice and Impartiality in Transitional Kosovo
from Part Two - The Force of Everyday Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2019
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Everyday Justice
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Everyday Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter One Theorizing Everyday Justice
- Part One Im/possibilities of Everyday Justice
- Part Two The Force of Everyday Justice
- Chapter Four ‘We don’t work for the Serbs, we work for human rights’
- Chapter Five The Enduring Transition
- Part Three Everyday Justice Unbound
- Afterword
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
This chapter looks at the modalities through which impartiality can be guaranteed in a context as fraught and highly politicized as post-war Kosovo, and explores how impartiality is produced in the everyday at the Kosovo Property Agency (KPA). The KPA is a quasi-judicial institution put in place by the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) to ‘resolve’ war-related property claims and thereby restitute property rights to, for a great majority of claims, Kosovo Serbian ‘displaced persons’. The chapter argues that impartiality is produced and made possible by different, seemingly contradictory repertoires of justice that are acted out in everyday practice by the national lawyers of the agency. It probes the tenets of the dialectic between ‘global’ ideals and ‘local’ practice, and ethnographically demonstrates the limits of an anthropology of human rights that sees vernacularization and meaning-making as the only analytical tools available. The chapter shows that, in the specific political landscape of post-war Kosovo, it is the ‘nationalistic bias’ of Kosovo Albanian lawyers that ensures due diligence and respect for rule of law principles.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Everyday JusticeLaw, Ethnography, Injustice, pp. 83 - 105Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Anders, Gerhard, and Zenker, Olaf. 2014. ‘Transition and Justice: An Introduction’. Development & Change 45(3): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besky, Sarah. 2014. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Plantations in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boswell, Christina. 2008. ‘The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy’. Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cady, Jean-Christian. 2012. ‘Establishing the Rule of Law: The UN Challenge in Kosovo’. Focus Stratégique 34 bis.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari Maxine, and Goodale, Mark, eds. 2010. Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coles, Kimberley. 2007. Democratic Designs: International Intervention and Electoral Practices in Postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2011. Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, and Kelly, Tobias, eds. 2007. Paths to International Justice: Social and Legal Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eide, Kai. 2005. A Comprehensive Review of the Situation in Kosovo. New York: United Nations Security Council.Google Scholar
Englund, Harri. 2012. ‘Human Rights and Village Headmen in Malawi: Translation beyond Vernacularization’. In Eckert, Julia, Donahoe, Brian, Strumpell, Christian, and Biner, Zerrin Ozlem (eds.), Law against the State: Ethnographic Forays into Law’s Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark. 2007. ‘The Power of Right(s): Tracking Empires of Law and New Modes of Social Resistance in Bolivia (and Elsewhere)’. In Goodale, Mark and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, Mark, and Merry, Sally Engle, eds. 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1996. Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Empowerment and Privatization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1993. The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Matthew. 2003. ‘The File: Agency, Authority and Autography in a Pakistani Bureaucracy’. Language and Communication 23: 287–314.Google Scholar
Jensen, Steffen. 2014. ‘Conflicting Logics of Exceptionality: New Beginnings and the Problem of Police Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa’. Development & Change 45(3): 458–478.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism’. American Anthropologist 108(1): 38–51.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2010. ‘Beyond Compliance: Toward an Anthropological Understanding of International Justice’. In Clarke, Kamari Maxine and Goodale, Mark (eds.), Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moratti, Massimo, Philpott, Charles, and Wicklin, Brian. 2004. Feasibility Study to Assess the Scope and Nature of Work for an Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Land and Private Commercial Properties in Kosovo. Pristina: European Agency for Reconstruction.Google Scholar
Murray Li, Tania. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2010. ‘Epilogue: The Words We Use: Justice, Human Rights, and the Sense of Injustice’. In Clarke, Kamari Maxine and Goodale, Mark (eds.), Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niezen, Ronald. 2013. Truth and Indignation: Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
OHCHR. 2003. ‘Independence and Impartiality of Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers’. In OHCHR and IBA (eds.), Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
OSCE. 1999. Kosovo/Kosova: As Seen, as Told: An Analysis of the Human Rights Findings of the OSCE Kosovo Verification Mission, October 1998 to June 1999. Warsaw: OSCE.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, Mariella. 2003. ‘Contract of Mutual (In)difference: Government and the Humanitarian Apparatus in Contemporary Albania and Kosovo’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10(1).Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Rosalind, Waldorf, Lars, and Hazan, Pierre, eds. 2010. Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities after Mass Violence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Speed, Shannon. 2007. ‘Exercising Rights and Reconfiguring Resistance in the Zapatista Juntas de Buen Gobierno’. In Goodale, Mark and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Storme, Marcel. 2014. ‘Reflections on Judicial Independence: Past Achievements and Future Agenda’. In Shetreet, Simon (ed.), The Culture of Judicial Independence: Rule of Law and World Peace. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Todorova, Maria. 2009 [1997]. Imagining the Balkans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by