Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:33:20.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2023

Jonas J. Schoenefeld
Jonas J. Schoenefeld
Affiliation:
Institute for Housing and Environment, Darmstadt, Germany
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Evaluation of Polycentric Climate Governance , pp. 228 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. W. (2011). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy, 30, 571–590.Google Scholar
Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.Google Scholar
AEA, ECOFYS, Fraunhofer, & ICCS. (2009). Quantification of the effects on greenhouse gas emissions of policies and measures: Final Report. Brussels.Google Scholar
Albaek, E. (1995). Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making. Policy Sciences, 28(1), 79–100.Google Scholar
Aligica, P. D. (2014). Institutional diversity and political economy: The Ostroms and beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aligica, P. D., & Sabetti, F. (2014a). The collective action theory path to contextual analysis. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 253–258.Google Scholar
Aligica, P. D., & Sabetti, F. (2014b). The Ostroms’ research program for the study of institutions and governance: Theoretical and epistemic foundations. In Sabetti, F. & Aligica, P. D. (Eds.), Choice, rules and collective action: The Ostroms on the study of institutions and governance (pp. 1–43). ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In Alkin, M. C. (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences (pp. 12–65). Sage.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, D., & Banks, J. S. (1998). Social choice theory, game theory, and positive political theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 259–287.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., Zelli, F., & Schleifer, P. (2018). Legitimacy and accountability in polycentric climate governance. In Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 338–356). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bang, G., Victor, D. G., & Andresen, S. (2017). California’s cap-and-trade system: Diffusion and lessons. Global Environmental Politics, 17(3), 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterbury, S. C. E. (2006). Principles and purposes of European Union cohesion policy evaluation. Regional Studies, 40(2), 179–188.Google Scholar
Bemelmans-Videc, M. L. (1995). Evaluation in Europe and a new professional association: The EES. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 8(3), 3–7.Google Scholar
Benjamin, R. (1982). The historical nature of social-scientific knowledge: The case of comparative political inquiry. In Ostrom, E. (Ed.), Strategies of political inquiry (pp. 69–98). Sage.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.Google Scholar
Benson, D., & Jordan, A. J. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378.Google Scholar
Benson, D., & Lorenzoni, I. (2014). Examining the scope for national lesson‐drawing on climate governance. The Political Quarterly, 85(2), 202–211.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51, 189–211.Google Scholar
Beywl, W., Fabian, C., & Widmer, T. (2009). Evaluation: Ein systematisches Handbuch. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (1993). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451–558.Google Scholar
Borrás, S., & Højlund, S. (2015). Evaluation and policy learning: The learners’ perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007). New forms of accountability and EU-governance. Comparative European Politics, 5(1), 104–120.Google Scholar
Bovens, M., Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2006). The politics of policy evaluation. In Moran, M., Rein, M., & Goodin, R. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 319–335). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, T. (2009). Evaluation in Deutschland: Professionalisierungsstand und -perspektiven. Waxmann.Google Scholar
Bressers, N., Twist, M., & Heuvelhof, E. (2013). Exploring the temporal dimension in policy evaluation studies. Policy Sciences, 46(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Betsill, M. M. et al. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. (2021). Die Energie der Zukunft: 8. Monitoring-Bericht zur Energiewende – Berichtsjahre 2018 und 2019. Bundesregierung. www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Energie/achter-monitoring-bericht-energie-der-zukunft.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=32v.Google Scholar
Bundesrechnungshof. (2022). Bericht nach § 99 BHO zur Steuerung des Klimaschutzes in Deutschland. www.bundesrechnungshof.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Berichte/2022/steuerung-klimaschutz-deutschland-volltext.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.Google Scholar
Bundi, P. (2016). What do we know about the demand for evaluation? Insights from the parliamentary arena. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4), 522–541.Google Scholar
Burnham, P. (2009). State. In McLean, I. & McMillan, A. (Eds.), The concise Oxford dictionary of politics (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bussmann, W. (2005). Typen und Terminologie von Evaluationsklauseln. LeGes, 16(1), 97–102.Google Scholar
Bussmann, W. (2008). The emergence of evaluation in Switzerland. Evaluation, 14(4), 499–506.Google Scholar
Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952.Google Scholar
Chelimsky, E. (2006). The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. In Shaw, I., Greene, J. C., & Mark, M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation: The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 33–55). Sage.Google Scholar
Chelimsky, E. (2009). Integrating evaluation units into the political environment of government: The role of evaluation policy. New Directions for Evaluation, 123, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, T., & Neuhold, C. (2013). Informal politics in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1196–1206.Google Scholar
Christie, C. A. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 2003(97), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. H. (2011). From global to polycentric climate governance. Climate Law, 2(3), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. H. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 114–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, R. F., Fitzpatrick, J. L., & Rog, D. J. (2012). A first step forward: Context assessment. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(135), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COWI. (2013). Evaluation of the European Environment Agency. www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/governance/eea-evaluations/eea-evaluation-2013.Google Scholar
Crabbé, A., & Leroy, P. (2008). The handbook of environmental policy evaluation. Earthscan.Google Scholar
Dabinett, G., & Richardson, T. (1999). The European spatial approach: The role of power and knowledge in strategic planning and policy evaluation. Evaluation, 5(2), 220–236.Google Scholar
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2011). Organizing knowledge: Evidence and the construction of evaluative information systems. In Rist, R. C. & Stame, N. (Eds.), From studies to streams: Managing evaluative systems (pp. 65–80). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Derlien, H. U. (1990). Program evaluation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In Rist, R. C. (Ed.), Program Evaluation and the Management of Government: Patterns and Prospects Across Eight Nations (pp. 37–51). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Derlien, H. U. (2002). Policy evaluation in Germany: Institutional continuation and sectoral activation. In Furubo, J. E., Rist, R. C., & Sandahl, R. (Eds.), International atlas of evaluation (pp. 77–91). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Diaz-Puente, J. M., Yaguee, J. L., & Afonso, A. (2008). Building evaluation capacity in Spain: A case study of rural development and empowerment in the European Union. Evaluation Review, 32(5), 478–506.Google Scholar
Doll, C., Eichhammer, W., Fleiter, T., et al. (2012). Ermittlung der Klimaschutzwirkung des Integrierten Energie- und Klimaschutzprogramms der Bundesregierung IEKP und Vorschlag für ein Konzept zur kontinuierlichen Überprüfung der Klimaschutzwirkung des IEKP – Arbeitspaket 2: Entwicklung eines Monitoringkonzepts für das Integrierte Energie- und Klimaschutzprogramm (IEKP). Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
Dorsch, M. J., & Flachsland, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 45–64.Google Scholar
Duffy, D. N. (2017). Evaluation and governing in the 21st century: Disciplinary measures, transformative possibilities. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dupuis, J., & Biesbroek, R. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1476–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duscha, M., Klemisch, H., & Meyer, W. (2009). Umweltevaluation in Deutschland: Entwicklungstrends mit Fokus auf dem Energiesektor. In Widmer, T., Beywl, W., & Fabian, C. (Eds.), Evaluation: Ein systematisches Handbuch (pp. 203–212). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (2000). Case study and theory in political science. In Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (Eds.), Case study method: key issues, key texts (pp. 119–164). Sage.Google Scholar
The Economist. (2014). The Environmental Union: On climate change, if little else, Europe still aspires to global leadership. www.economist.com/news/europe/21629387-climate-change-if-little-else-europe-still-aspires-global-leadership-environmentalGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (1996). Evaluation: Concrete steps towards best practice across the Commission. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2002). Evaluation standards. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/evaluation/docs/standards_c_2002_5267_final_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2013). Strengthening the foundations of smart regulation: Improving evaluation. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/docs/com_2013_686_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Court of Auditors. (2018). Ex-post review of EU legislation: A well-established system, but incomplete. European Union. www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR18_16/SR_BETTER_REGULATION_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Court of Auditors. (2021a). Special Report Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing. European Union. www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR21_16/SR_CAP-and-Climate_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Court of Auditors. (2021b). Special Report EU funding for biodiversity and climate change in EU forests: Positive but limited results. European Union. www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR21_21/SR_Forestry_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency. (2001). Reporting on environmental measures: Are we being effective? LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
European Environment Agency. (2016). Environment and climate policy evaluation. European Environment Agency. www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environment-and-climate-policy-evaluation/at_download/fileGoogle Scholar
Farmer, A. M. (2012). Monitoring and limiting greenhouse gases: Manual of European Environmental Policy. https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/3c5e75f4-7292-42a7-b8f4-26473c5a9f3d/3.4_Monitoring_and_limiting_greenhouse_gases_-_final.pdf?v=63664509872Google Scholar
Feldman, D. L., & Wilt, C. A. (1996). Evaluating the implementation of state-level global climate change programs. Journal of Environment and Development, 5(1), 46–72.Google Scholar
Fetterman, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2006). Evaluating public policy. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2012). An introduction to context and its role in evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(135), 7–24.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, D. M. (2005). Evaluation. In Mathison, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 139–140). Sage.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, N., van Asselt, H., Bößner, S. et al. (2019). The practice of climate change policy evaluations in the European Union and its member states: results from a meta-analysis. Sustainable Earth, 2(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Furubo, J. E., Rist, R. C., & Sandahl, R. (Eds.). (2002). International atlas of evaluation. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Galaz, V., Crona, B., Österblom, H., Olsson, P., & Folke, C. (2012). Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries: Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 81, 21–32.Google Scholar
Gallopín, G. C. (1996). Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators: A systems approach. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 1(3), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1996). The theory of institutional design. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gore, T., & Wells, P. (2009). Governance and evaluation: The case of EU regional policy horizontal priorities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 158–167.Google Scholar
Gravey, V., & Jordan, A. J. (2016). Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(8), 1180–1198.Google Scholar
Gray, A., & Jenkins, B. (2002). Policy and program evaluation in the United Kingdom: A reflective state? In Furubo, J. E., Rist, R. C., & Sandahl, R. (Eds.), International atlas of evaluation (pp. 129–153). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Greene, J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. American Journal of Evaluation, 18(1), 25–35.Google Scholar
Greene, J. C. (2005). Context. In Mathison, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 82–84). Sage.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. (2017). Interest representation in the European Union (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. Josey-Bass Limited.Google Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.Google Scholar
Gudmundsson, H. (2003). The policy use of environmental indicators: Learning from evaluation research. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 2(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Guha-Khasnobis, B., Kanbur, R., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Beyond formality and informality. In Guha-Khasnobis, B., Kanbur, R., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.), Linking the formal and informal economy: Concepts and policies (pp. 1–18). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. (2008). Global change: Analyzing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In Young, O. R., King, L. A., & Schroeder, H. (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haas, P. (2004). When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 569–592.Google Scholar
Haigh, N. (1996). Climate change policies and politics in the European Community. In O’Riordan, T. & Jäger, J. (Eds.), Politics of climate change: A European perspective (pp. 155–185). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2013). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanberger, A. (2012). Framework for exploring the interplay of governance and evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 16(3), 9–27.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science (New York, N.Y.), 162(3859), 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (2021). Pathologies of climate governance: International relations, national politics and human nature. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, C. C. (2015). Unpacking learning: Conceptualising and measuring the effects of two policy exercises on climate governance [PhD, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam]. http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/53559/complete%20dissertation.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Haug, C., Rayner, T., Jordan, A. J., Hildingsson, R., Stripple, J., Monni, S., Huitema, D., Massey, E., van Asselt, H., & Berkhout, F. (2010). Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: Evidence from policy evaluation studies. Climatic Change, 101 (3–4), 427–445.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2002). What’s political about political science? In Political analysis (pp. 59–88). Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J., Kay, J., Lee, A. et al. (2013). Evaluation under contract: Government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92(1), 224–239.Google Scholar
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(04), 725–740.Google Scholar
Hertting, N., & Vedung, E. (2012). Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary takes us? Evaluation, 18(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
Hildén, M. (2009). Time horizons in evaluating environmental policies. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009(122), 9–18.Google Scholar
Hildén, M., Jordan, A. J., & Huitema, D. (2017). Special issue on experimentation for climate change solutions editorial: The search for climate change and sustainability solutions – The promise and the pitfalls of experimentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hildén, M., Jordan, A. J., & Rayner, T. (2014). Climate policy innovation: Developing an evaluation perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 884–905.Google Scholar
Hill, M., & Varone, F. (2017). The public policy process. Routledge.Google Scholar
HM Treasury. (2003). The green book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdfGoogle Scholar
HM Treasury. (2011). The magenta book: Guidance for evaluation. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220542/magenta_book_combined.pdfGoogle Scholar
HM Treasury, & DECC. (2010). Valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for appraisal and evaluation. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110612080604/http://decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/statistics/analysis_group/122-valuationenergyuseggemissions.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hogwood, B. W., & Gunn, L. A. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hojlund, S. (2015). Evaluation in the European Commission. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, E., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, M. (2014). Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Global Environmental Change, 29, 395–403.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., Jordan, A. J., Massey, E. et al. (2011). The evaluation of climate policy: Theory and emerging practice in Europe. Policy Sciences, 44(2), 179–198.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., Jordan, A. J., van Asselt, H., & Patterson, J. (2019). Polycentric governance and climate change. In Galaz, V. (Ed.), Global Challenges, Governance, and Complexity (pp. 124–146). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Hulme, M., Neufeldt, H., Colyer, H., & Ritchie, A. (2009). Adaptation and mitigation strategies: Supporting European climate policy. The final report from the ADAM project. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/24958/Google Scholar
Hyvarinen, J. (1999). The European Community’s Monitoring Mechanism for CO2 and other greenhouse gases: The Kyoto Protocol and other recent developments. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 8(2), 191–197.Google Scholar
IEEP, & EIPA. (2003). Evaluation of the European Environment Agency. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/eea_c_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Jacob, S., Speer, S., & Furubo, J.‑E. (2015). The institutionalization of evaluation matters: Updating the International Atlas of Evaluation 10 years later. Evaluation, 21(1), 6–31.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. (2012). Climate policy: Deadline 2015. Nature, 481(7380), 137–138.Google Scholar
Jenkins, B., & Gray, A. (1990). Policy evaluation in British government: From idealism to realism. In Rist, R. C. (Ed.), Program evaluation and the management of government: Patterns and prospects across eight nations. (pp. 53–70). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, K., Greenseid, L. O., Toal, S. A., King, J. A., Lawrenz, F., & Volkov, B. (2009). Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 377–410.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance … or government? Policy & Politics, 29(2), 193–208.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildén, M. et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5, 977–982.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Schoenefeld, J. J., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018). Governing climate change polycentrically: Setting the scene. In Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 3–25). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018a). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.). (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union: Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., & Moore, B. (2022). The durability‐flexibility dialectic: The evolution of decarbonisation policies in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–20.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., & Rayner, T. (2010). The evolution of climate change policy in the EU: An historical overview. In Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.), Climate change policy in the European Union: Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? (pp. 52–80). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., & Schout, A. (2006). The coordination of the European Union: Exploring the capacities of networked governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., van Asselt, H., Berkhout, F., Huitema, D., & Rayner, T. (2012). Climate change policy in the European Union: Understanding the paradoxes of multi-level governing. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 43–66.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, P., & Wangler, L. U. (2014). Evaluation in der Umweltpolitik am Beispiel Klimapolitik. In Böttcher, W., Kerlen, C., Maats, P., Schwab, O., & Sheikh, S. (Eds.), Evaluation in Deutschland und Österreich: Stand und Entwicklungsperspektiven in den Arbeitsfeldern der DeGEval-Gesellschaft für Evaluation (pp. 159–170). Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Ostrom, E. (1994). Local commons and global interdependence. Sage.Google Scholar
Kerr, A. (2007). Serendipity is not a strategy: The impact of national climate programmes on greenhouse‐gas emissions. Area, 39(4), 418–430.Google Scholar
King, J. A. (2003). The challenge of studying evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 2003(97), 57–68.Google Scholar
Kleine, M. (2013). Informal governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knaap, G. J., & Kim, T. J. (1998). Environmental program evaluation: A primer. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2005). Performance-based monitoring. In Mathison, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 300–306). Sage.Google Scholar
Lange, E. (1983). Zur Entwicklung und Methodik der Evaluationsforschung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 12(3), 253–270.Google Scholar
Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Lee, E., Su Jung, C., & Lee, M.‑K. (2014). The potential role of boundary organizations in the climate regime. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 24–36.Google Scholar
Leeuw, F. L. (2010). Benefits and costs of evaluation: An essay. Zeitschrift Für Evaluation, 9(2), 211–229.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M. (2015). Indicators: Tools for informing, monitoring or controlling? In Jordan, A. J. & Turnpenny, J. (Eds.), The tools of policy formulation: Actors, capacities, venues and effects (pp. 76–99). Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Levine, R. A. (1984). Programmevaluierung und Politikanalyse in Europa, USA und Kanada – ein Überblick. In Hellstern, G. M. & Wollmann, H. (Eds.), Handbuch zur Evaluierungsforschung (Vol. 1, pp. 94–133). Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Löwenbein, O. (2008). The evaluation market in Germany. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 5(10), 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mangis, J. K. (1998). The United States’ sulfur dioxide emissions allowance program: An overview with emphasis of monitoring requirements and procedures and a summary report on US experience with environmental trading systems. European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In Macedo, S. (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211–239). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science and Policy, 36, 8–10.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, M. (2010). Voice or loyalty? The evolution of the European Environment Agency (EEA). Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 881–901.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2001). Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 189–210.Google Scholar
Mastenbroek, E., van Voorst, S., & Meuwese, A. (2016). Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1329–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Will lessons from small-scale social dilemmas scale up? In Biel, A., Eek, D., Gärling, T., & Gustafsson, M. (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas (pp. 189–211). Springer.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M. D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M. D. (2016). Polycentric governance in theory and practice: Dimensions of aspiration and practical limitations. Paper presented at the Polycentricity Workshop, Indiana University, 14–17 December 2015. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Google Books Team, … & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182.Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P. (2003). A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments: Context and key concepts. Evaluation, 9(4), 415–436.Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P. (2006). Environmental policy evaluation: Concepts and practice. The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P. (2013). Policy evaluation. In Jordan, A. J. & Adelle, C. (Eds.), Environmental policy in the EU: Actors, institutions and processes (3rd ed., pp. 267–286). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P. (2021). Policy evaluation. In Jordan, A. J. & Gravey, V. (Eds.), Environmental policy in the EU: Actors, institutions and processes (4th ed., pp. 241–258). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mor, S., & Ghimire, M. (2022). Transparency and Nationally Determined Contributions: A Review of the Paris Agreement. Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law, 11(2), 106–119.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. H. (2017). Evolving polycentric governance of the Great Barrier Reef. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(15), E3013–E3021.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D. & Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: Sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.479Google Scholar
Neslen, A. (2011). EU faces down tar sands industry. www.euractiv.com/section/uk-europe/news/eu-faces-down-tar-sands-industry/Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., Jordan, A. J., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B., & Russel, D. (2008). The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 335–355.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. (2016). Where to go from Paris? The European Union in climate geopolitics. Global Affairs, 2(2), 119–130.Google Scholar
OECD-DAC. (2002). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. DAC Network on Development Evaluation, OECD.Google Scholar
Öko-Institut, Cambridge Economics, AMEC, Harmelink Consulting, & TNO. (2012). Ex-post quantification of the effects and costs of policies and measures. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/g-gas/monitoring/docs/report_expost_quantification_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 493–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2006). Converting threats into opportunities. Political Science & Politics, 39(01), 3–12.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 21–64). Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010a). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010b). A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions, 1(2), 27–36.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010c). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2012). Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: Must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Economic Theory, 49(2), 353–369.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2014a). Beyond Positivism. In Sabetti, F. & Dragos Aligia, P. (Eds.), Choice, rules and collective action: The Ostroms on the study of institutions and governance (pp. 213–225). ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2014b). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(1), 71–108.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2007). Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(39), 15176–15178.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2007). Tenure alone is not sufficient: Monitoring is essential. Environmental Economics & Policy Studies, 8(3), 175–199.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1999a). Polycentricity (Part 1). In McGinnis, M. D. (Ed.), Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 52–74). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1999b). Polycentricity (Part 2). In McGinnis, M. D. (Ed.), Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 119–138). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842.Google Scholar
Owens, S., Rayner, T., & Bina, O. (2004). New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A, 36(11), 1943–1960.Google Scholar
Parsons, W. (2007). Policy analysis in Britain. In Fischer, F., Miller, G. J., & Sidney, M. S. (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 537–552). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Partzsch, L. (2017). “Power with” and “power to” in environmental politics and the transition to sustainability. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 193–211.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P., Chan, S., Sanderink, L., & Widerberg, O. (2018). Linkages: Understanding their role in polycentric governance. In Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 169–187). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2019). Transformation to global sustainability: Implications for evaluation and evaluators. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(162), 103–117.Google Scholar
Pattyn, V., van Voorst, S., Mastenbroek, E., & Dunlop, C. A. (2018). Policy evaluation in Europe. In Ongaro, E. & van Thiel, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 577–593). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of co‐ordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295–311.Google Scholar
Peterson, J., & Shackleton, M. (2012). The institutions of the European Union. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pleger, L., & Sager, F. (2018). Betterment, undermining, support and distortion: A heuristic model for the analysis of pressure on evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 166–172.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (1993). Occasional excursions: A brief history of policy evaluation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 46(3), 353–363.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (1998). Evaluation in Europe: Boom or bubble? Evaluation, 4(2), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2013). Context in public policy and management: The missing link? Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Polverari, L., & Bachtler, J. (2004). Assessing the evidence: The evaluation of regional policy in Europe. EoRPA Paper, 4(5), Paper prepared for the EPRC Regional Policy Research Consortium at Ross Priory, Loch Lomondside on October 3–5, 2004.Google Scholar
Poptcheva, E. M. (2013). Policy and legislative evaluation in the EU. www.europarl.europa.eu/eplibrary/Policy-and-legislative-evaluation-in-the-EU.pdf.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), 159–183.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. (2007). Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda? Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 190–207.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. (2010). Rationality, power, management and symbols: Four images of regulatory impact assessment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(2), 164–188.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. (2021). The state of play with the better regulation strategy of the European Commission. European University Institute.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M., & Dente, B. (1996). Evaluation strategies and analysis of the policy process. Evaluation, 2(1), 51–66.Google Scholar
Ramboll. (2020). Update of the EEA catalogue of available evaluations of European environment and climate policies. https://ramboll.com/-/media/files/rgr/documents/media/news/eea-evaluation-catalogue.pdf?la=enGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M. R., Davis, S. J., Peters, G. P. et al. (2014). Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, T. & Jordan, A. J. (2013). The European Union: The polycentric climate policy leader? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.205Google Scholar
Rich, R. F. (1991). Knowledge creation, diffusion, and utilization: Perspectives of the founding editor of knowledge. Science Communication, 12(3), 319–337.Google Scholar
Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy, 10(3), 11–24.Google Scholar
Risley, J. S. (2007). Evaluation activities in the United Kingdom. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 1(1), 77–80.Google Scholar
Rist, R. C., & Stame, N. (eds.). (2011). From studies to streams: Managing evaluative systems. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rog, D. J. (2012). When background becomes foreground: Toward context‐sensitive evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(135), 25–40.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham House.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Sager, F., Widmer, T., & Balthasar, A. (2017). Schlussfolgerungen: Evaluation als Teil des politischen Systems in der Schweiz? In Sager, F., Widmer, T., & Balthasar, A. (Eds.), Evaluation im politischen System der Schweiz (pp. 313–330). NZZ Libro.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence‐based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J. (2023). Environmental policy evaluation. In Jörgens, H. & Knill, C. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Policy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J. (2021). The European Green Deal: What prospects for governing climate change with policy monitoring? Politics and Governance, 9(3), 370–379.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. J. (2018). The challenges of monitoring national climate policy: Learning lessons from the EU. Climate Policy, 18(1), 118–128.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M., & Schulze, K. (2022). Policy innovation for sustainable development. In Russell, D. & Kirsop-Taylor, N. (Eds.), Handbook on the governance of sustainable development (pp. 160–174). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., & Jordan, A. J. (2017). Governing policy evaluation? Towards a new typology. Evaluation, 23(3), 274–293.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., & Jordan, A. J. (2019). Environmental policy evaluation in the EU: between learning, accountability, and political opportunities? Environmental Politics, 28(2), 365–384.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., & Jordan, A. J. (2020). Towards harder soft governance? Monitoring climate policy in the EU. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(6), 774–786.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., Schulze, K., & Bruch, N. (2022). The diffusion of climate change adaptation policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 13(3), e775. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.775Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., Schulze, K., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. J. (2019). Policy monitoring in the EU: The impact of institutions, implementation, and quality. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 719–741.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., Schulze, K., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. J. (2021). The challenging paths to net-zero emissions: Insights from the monitoring of national policy mixes. The International Spectator, 56(3), 24–40.Google Scholar
Schoenefeld, J. J., Stein, B., & Renz, I. (2023). Renovating Europe – how to start and steer a wave? In Dyrhauge, H. & Kurze, K. (Eds.), Making the European Green Deal work: EU sustainability policies at home and abroad. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schröter, D. C. (2007). Evaluation in Europe: An overview. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 1(1), 68–76.Google Scholar
Scriven, M. (1981). Evaluation thesaurus. Sage.Google Scholar
Segerholm, C. (2003). Researching evaluation in national (state) politics and administration: A critical approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 353–372.Google Scholar
Singleton, B. E. (2017). What’s missing from Ostrom? Combining design principles with the theory of sociocultural viability. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 994–1014.Google Scholar
Somanathan, E., Sterner, T., Sugiyama, T. et al. (2014). National and sub-national policies and institutions. In Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y. et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1141–1205). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorrell, S., Smith, A., Betz, R. et al. (2003). Interaction in EU climate policy, final report to DG Research under the Framework V project interaction in EU climate policy (Project No. EVK2-CT-2000-0067 FINAL REPORT March 2001 to March 2003. Research funded in part by THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION in the framework of the Fifth Framework Program: Energy, Environment & Sustainable Development).Google Scholar
Stame, N. (2003). Evaluation and the policy context: The European experience. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 3(2), 37–43.Google Scholar
Stame, N. (2006). Governance, democracy and evaluation. Evaluation, 12(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
Stame, N. (2008). The European project, federalism and evaluation. Evaluation, 14(2), 117–140.Google Scholar
Stephenson, P. (2015). Reconciling audit and evaluation? The shift to performance and effectiveness at the European Court of Auditors. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
Stephenson, P.J. & Schoenefeld, J.J. (2023). The role and functioning of evaluation in the European Union. Varone, F., Jacob, S. & Bund, P. (Eds.). Edward Elgar Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Stephenson, P., Schoenefeld, J. J., & Leeuw, F. L. (2019). The politicization of evaluation: Constructing and contesting EU policy performance. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 663–679.Google Scholar
Stern, E. (2009). Evaluation policy in the European Union and its institutions. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009(123), 67–85.Google Scholar
Stockmann, R. (2006). Evaluation in Deutschland. In Stockmann, R. (Ed.), Evaluationsforschung: Grundlagen und ausgewählte Forschungsfelder (pp. 11–40). Waxmann.Google Scholar
Stockmann, R., & Meyer, W. (2014). Evaluation: Eine Einführung. Budrich.Google Scholar
Struhkamp, G. (2007). Evaluation in Germany: An overview. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 2(3), 180–194.Google Scholar
Sullivan, H. (2011). “Truth” junkies: Using evaluation in UK public policy. Policy and Politics, 39(4), 499–512.Google Scholar
Summa, H., & Toulemonde, J. (2002). Evaluation in the European Union: Addressing complexity and ambiguity. In Furubo, J. E., Rist, R. C., & Sandahl, R. (Eds.), International atlas of evaluation (pp. 407–424). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Tarko, V. (2017). Elinor Ostrom: An intellectual biography. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Taylor, S., Bachtler, J., & Polverari, L. (2001). Structural fund evaluation as a programme management tool: Comparative assessment and reflections on Germany. Informationen Zur Raumentwicklung, 6(7), 341–357.Google Scholar
Technopolis. (2008). Technopolis effectiveness evaluation of the European Environment Agency. www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/governance/eea-evaluations/2008Google Scholar
Thompson, T. M., Rausch, S., Saari, R. K., & Selin, N. E. (2014). A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies. Nature Climate Change, 4, 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2342Google Scholar
Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2006). It depends. In Goodin, R. E. & Tilly, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 3–32). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toulemonde, J. (2000). Evaluation culture(s) in Europe: Differences and convergence between national practices. Vierteljahrshefte Zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 69(3), 350–357.Google Scholar
Turnpenny, J., Russel, D., Jordan, A. J., Bond, A., & Sheate, W. R. (2016). Environment. In Dunlop, C. A. & Radaelli, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of regulatory impact assessment (pp. 193–208). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Uitto, J. I. (2016). Evaluating the environment as a global public good. Evaluation, 22(1), 108–115.Google Scholar
UK Evaluation Society. (2013). UKES 2013 Colin Jacobs. www.youtube.com/watch?v=17_aLZUQglIGoogle Scholar
van Voorst, S. (2017). Evaluation capacity in the European Commission. Evaluation, 23(1), 24–41.Google Scholar
van Voorst, S., & Zwaan, P. (2019). The (non-) use of ex post legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(3), 366–385.Google Scholar
Van Voorst, S., Zwaan, P., & Schoenefeld, J. J. (2022). Policy evaluation: An evolving and expanding feature of EU governance. In Elgar Encyclopedia of European Union Public Policy (pp. 595–603). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
van Zeben, J., & Bobic, A. (2019). Polycentricity in the European Union. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Vedung, E. (2013). Six models of evaluation. In Araral, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 387–400). Routledge.Google Scholar
Versluis, E., van Keulen, M., & Stephenson, P. (2011). Analyzing the European Union policy process. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vo, A. T., & Christie, C. A. (2015). Advancing research on evaluation through the study of context. New Directions for Evaluation, 2015(148), 43–55.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531–545.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. (1993). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93–106.Google Scholar
Wells, P. (2007). New Labour and evidence based policy making: 1997–2007. People, Place & Policy Online, 1(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
Widmer, T. (2004). The development and status of evaluation standards in Western Europe. New Directions for Evaluation, 2004(104), 31–42.Google Scholar
Wirths, D., Rosser, C., Horber-Papazian, K., & Mader, L. (2017). Über die gesetzliche Verankerung von Evaluation: Die Verteilung von Evaluationsklauseln und deren Auswirkungen auf kantonaler Ebene. In Sager, F., Widmer, T., & Balthasar, A. (Eds.), Evaluation im politischen System der Schweiz (pp. 155–188). NZZ Libro.Google Scholar
Wörlen, C. (2011). Meta-evaluation of climate mitigation evaluations. www.climate-eval.org/sites/default/files/studies/Climate-Eval%20Meta-Evaluation%20of%20Climate%20Mitigation%20Evaluations.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wörlen, C., Rieseberg, S., & Lorenz, R. (2014). A national experiment without evaluation or monitoring and evaluating the Energiewende? International Energy Policy and Programme Evaluation Conference. www.iepec.org/conf-docs/papers/2014/Sarah%20Rieseberg.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, R. K. W., & Connelly, J. (2011). The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics (Vol. 15). Routledge.Google Scholar
Wyns, T. (2015). Lessons from the EU’s ETS for a new international climate agreement. The International Spectator, 50(1), 46–59.Google Scholar
Yamin, F., & Depledge, J. (2004). The international climate change regime: A guide to rules, institutions and procedures. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zito, A. R. (2009). European agencies as agents of governance and EU learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1224–1243.Google Scholar
Zito, A. R., & Schout, A. (2009). Learning theory reconsidered: EU integration theories and learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1103–1123.Google Scholar
Zwaan, P., van Voorst, S., & Mastenbroek, E. (2016). Ex post legislative evaluation in the European Union: Questioning the usage of evaluations as instruments for accountability. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 674–693.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jonas J. Schoenefeld, Institute for Housing and Environment, Darmstadt, Germany
  • Book: The Evaluation of Polycentric Climate Governance
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009049658.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jonas J. Schoenefeld, Institute for Housing and Environment, Darmstadt, Germany
  • Book: The Evaluation of Polycentric Climate Governance
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009049658.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jonas J. Schoenefeld, Institute for Housing and Environment, Darmstadt, Germany
  • Book: The Evaluation of Polycentric Climate Governance
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009049658.014
Available formats
×