Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:08:54.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Psychological aspects of male infertility: lifting the shroud of shame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2009

Grace M. Centola
Affiliation:
University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Infertility has predominantly been viewed as a female infliction (Menning, 1988). In some cultures, when a couple is unable to conceive the man may be granted a divorce so he can remarry, on the basis of the automatic assumption of female factor infertility (Greil, 1991). The notion that the problem might originate in man is not even entertained. In our own culture, most infertility research has focused on the female reproductive system, resulting in a greater array of diagnostic and treatment alternatives for women than for men (Office of Technology Assessment, 1988). Yet, approximately 35% of infertile couples have trouble conceiving due to male factor infertility and another 20% due to combined male and female factor problems (Menning, 1988). In this chapter we will first address the societal context of male infertility and masculinity, then discuss gender and couple patterns of distress and treatment, how health care professionals can reduce the shame response, secrecy in donor insemination, and male sexual dysfunction.

The male response to infertility

Historically and across cultures, there has been difficulty in accepting the existence of male infertility. The individual and collective denial of male factor infertility may occur for a variety of reasons. Since it takes two to create a pregnancy, the assumption of who is defective may be guided by which gender is easier to label as abnormal. Historically, women have been viewed as being less valuable, less intelligent, and less capable in our male-dominated society (Tavris, 1992).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×