data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2739b/2739bfe8da62708f2861a9ce85c464c6380366c9" alt=""
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Bringing ‘peoples’ into international society
- 2 Wild ‘men’ and other tales
- 3 Dispossession and the purposes of international law
- 4 Recovering rights: land, self-determination and sovereignty
- 5 The political and moral legacy of conquest
- 6 Dealing with difference
- Conclusion
- Appendix
- Select bibliography
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
2 - Wild ‘men’ and other tales
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Bringing ‘peoples’ into international society
- 2 Wild ‘men’ and other tales
- 3 Dispossession and the purposes of international law
- 4 Recovering rights: land, self-determination and sovereignty
- 5 The political and moral legacy of conquest
- 6 Dealing with difference
- Conclusion
- Appendix
- Select bibliography
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Summary
The expansion overseas of European peoples as explorers and settlers required them to respond, in some way, to ‘other’ peoples who were both culturally and racially very different from themselves. While there were differences between Europeans themselves, they belonged to an essentially common culture. The diverse peoples they encountered in the Americas, Africa, Asia and the Pacific represented a variety of cultures radically different from their own. Coming into contact with many of these peoples for the first time must have been an extraordinary experience for Europeans; as it would have been for those they encountered. On the part of both Europeans and non-Europeans alike, there were varying degrees of, if not total, incomprehension or lack of mutual understanding of each other. Cultural incommensurabilty, or the absence of a common measure between cultures, was a crucial element in the development of relations between Europeans and non-Europeans. Europeans generally either made no attempt, or else failed, to understand non-Europeans in their own terms. Instead, Europeans typically conceptualised non-Europeans in ways that regarded them as inferior; dehumanised them; and treated them as representing a lower stage of political, social and economic development that Europeans had themselves left behind.
This chapter considers some ways in which non-Europeans were conceptualised by Europeans. Its purpose is neither to write a history nor to present a novel argument but instead to understand some important concepts in the evolution of European thought concerning others.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous PeoplesThe Moral Backwardness of International Society, pp. 56 - 83Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003