Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:59:42.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Behnam Taebi
Behnam Taebi
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Engineering
An Introduction
 , pp. 189 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, K. “Tectonic Implications of the Large Shioya-Oki Earthquakes of 1938.” Tectonophysics 41, no. 4 (August 31, 1977): 269–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(77)90136-6.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F., and Heinzerling, L.. Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing. New York: The New Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Acton, J. M., and Hibbs, M.. Why Fukushima Was Preventable. Nuclear Policy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March, 2012.Google Scholar
Ahmad, A. L., Mat Yasin, N. H., Derek, C. J. C., and Lim, J. K.. “Microalgae as a Sustainable Energy Source for Biodiesel Production: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, no. 1 (January 1, 2011): 584–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.018.Google Scholar
Ahn, J., Carsen, C., Jensen, M., Juraku, K., Nagasaki, S., and Tanaka, S., eds. Reflections on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Toward Social-Scientific Literacy and Engineering Resilience. Heidelberg: Springer Open, 2015. www.springer.com/engineering/energy+technology/book/978-3-319-12089-8.Google Scholar
Akhtarkhavari, A. Global Governance of the Environment: Environmental Principles and Change in International Law and Politics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010.Google Scholar
Alba, Davey. “Amazon Rekognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress with Arrest Mugshots.” BuzzFeed News, July 26, 2018. www.buzzfeednews.com/article/daveyalba/amazon-rekognition-facial-recognition-congress-false.Google Scholar
Albrechts, L. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31, no. 5 (October 1, 2004): 743–58. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3065.Google Scholar
Ale, B. J. M. “Tolerable or Acceptable: A Comparison of Risk Regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands.” Risk Analysis 25, no. 2 (2005): 231–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00585.x.Google Scholar
Allen, C., Wallach, W., and Smit, I.. “Why Machine Ethics?” IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, no. 4 (July, 2006): 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.83.Google Scholar
Altmann, Jürgen, Asaro, Peter, Sharkey, Noel, and Sparrow, Robert. “Armed Military Robots: Editorial.” Ethics and Information Technology 15, no. 2 (June 1, 2013): 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9318-1.Google Scholar
alZahir, S., and Kombo, L.. “Towards a Global Code of Ethics for Engineers.” IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology, and Engineering, Chicago, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amazeen, Michelle. “Gap (RED): Social Responsibility Campaign or Window Dressing?” Journal of Business Ethics 99, no. 2 (2011): 167–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0647-2.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., and Anderson, S. L.. “Robot Be Good: A Call for Ethical Autonomous Machines.” Scientific American 303, no. 4 (2010): 15–24.Google Scholar
Annema, J. A. “The Use of CBA in Decision-Making on Mega-projects: Empirical Evidence.” In International Handbook on Mega-projects, edited by Primus, H. and Van Wee, B. 291–312. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2014.Google Scholar
Annema, Jan Anne, Mouter, Niek, and Razaei, Jafar. “Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), or Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) or Both: Politicians’ Perspective in Transport Policy Appraisal.” Transportation Research Procedia 10 (January 1, 2015), 788–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asaro, Peter. “On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making.” International Review of the Red Cross 94, no. 886 (June, 2012): 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000768.Google Scholar
Asveld, L., and Stemerding, D.. Algae Oil on Trial: Conflicting Views of Technology and Nature. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut, 2016.Google Scholar
Asveld, L., and Stemerding, D.. “Social Learning in the Bioeconomy: The Case of Ecover.” In Experimentation beyond the Laboratory: New Perspectives on Technology in Society, edited by Van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., and Mehos, D., 103–24. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Asveld, L., and Roeser, S., eds. The Ethics of Technological Risk. London: Earthscan, 2009.Google Scholar
Asveld, L., van Dam-Mieras, R., Swierstra, T., Lavrijssen, S., Linse, K., and van den Hoven, J., eds. Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda? Cham: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Awad, Edmond, Dsouza, Sohan, Kim, Richard, Schulz, Jonathan, Henrich, Joseph, Shariff, Azim, Bonnefon, Jean-François, and Rahwan, Iyad. “The Moral Machine Experiment.” Nature 563, no. 7729 (November, 2018): 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6.Google Scholar
Backer, L C. “Transparency and Business in International Law: Governance between Norm and Technique.” In Transparency in International Law, edited by Bianchi, A. and Peters, A., 477–501. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Balakrishnan, Balamuralithara, Tochinai, Fumihiko, and Kanemitsu, Hidekazu. “Engineering Ethics Education: A Comparative Study of Japan and Malaysia.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25, no. 4 (2019): 1069–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0051-3.Google Scholar
Balat, Mustafa, and Balat, Havva. “Progress in Biodiesel Processing.” Applied Energy 87, no. 6 (June 1, 2010): 1815–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.01.012.Google Scholar
Barfod, M. B., Salling, K. B., and Leleur, S.. “Composite Decision Support by Combining Cost–Benefit and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis.” Decision Support Systems 51, no. 1 (April 1, 2011): 167–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.005.Google Scholar
Barry, B. “Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice.” In Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, edited by Dobson, A., 93–117. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. “Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice.” Theoria 45, no. 89 (1997): 43–65.Google Scholar
Basta, Claudia. “Siting Technological Risks: Cultural Approaches and Cross-Cultural Ethics.” Journal of Risk Research 14, no. 7 (2011): 799–817.Google Scholar
BBC. “France Scraps Controversial Airport Plan.” Europe, BBC News, January 17, 2018. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42723146.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L., and Childress, J. F.. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Beckerman, W. “Sustainable Development and Our Obligations to Future Generations.” In Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, edited by Dobson, A., 71–92. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1961. First published in 1789.Google Scholar
Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., and Puri, M.. On the Rise of the FinTechs: Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Center for Financial Research, 2018.Google Scholar
Bergmans, Anne, Sundqvist, Göran, Kos, Drago, and Simmons, Peter. “The Participatory Turn in Radioactive Waste Management: Deliberation and the Social–Technical Divide.” Journal of Risk Research 18, nos. 3–4 (2015): 347–63.Google Scholar
Bonnefon, Jean-François, Shariff, Azim, and Rahwan, Iyad. “The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles.” Science 352, no. 6293 (June 24, 2016): 1573–76. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654.Google Scholar
Bonser, D. “Nuclear Now for Sustainable Development.” Nuclear Energy 42, no. 1 (2003): 51–54.Google Scholar
Borger, Julian, and Vidal, John. “New Study to Force Ministers to Review Climate Change Plan.” Environment, Guardian, June 18, 2008. www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/jun/19/climatechange.biofuels.Google Scholar
Bråkenhielm, Carl Reinhold. “Ethics and the Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel.” Journal of Risk Research 18, no. 3 (2015): 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.988170.Google Scholar
Brenner, David J. “Are X-ray Backscatter Scanners Safe for Airport Passenger Screening? For Most Individuals, Probably Yes, but a Billion Scans per Year Raises Long-Term Public Health Concerns.” Radiology 259, no. 1 (April 1, 2011): 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11102347.Google Scholar
Brey, P. “Ethical Aspects of Behavior-Steering Technology.” In User Behavior and Technology Development: Shaping Sustainable Relations between Consumers and Technologies, edited by Verbeek, P. P. and Slob, A., 357–64. Berlin: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
Brinke, L., and Faber, J.. Review of the Social Cost–Benefit Analysis of Grand Ouest Airport: Comparison with Improvements of Nantes Atlantique. Delft: CE Delft, 2011.Google Scholar
Brooks, H. “Sustainability and Technology.” In Science and Sustainability: Selected Papers on IIASA’s 20th Anniversary, 29–60. Laxenburg: IIASA, 1992.Google Scholar
Bruggink, J. J. C., and Van der Zwaan, B. C. C.. “The Role of Nuclear Energy in Establishing Sustainable Energy Paths.” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 18, no. 2 (2002): 151–80.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. “Robots Should Be Slaves.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issue, edited by Wilks, Y., 63–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Butler, G., and McGlynn, G.. “Building or Burning the Bridges to a Sustainable Energy Policy.” In Nuclear or Not? Does Nuclear Power Have a Place in a Sustainable Energy Future?, edited by Elliott, D., 53–58. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Buyx, A. M., and Tait, J.. “Biofuels: Ethics and Policy-Making.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 5, no. 6 (2011): 631–39.Google Scholar
Calvert, Simeon C., Mecacci, Giulio, van Arem, Bart, Santoni de Sio, Filippo, Heikoop, Daniel D., and Hagenzieker, Marjan. “Gaps in the Control of Automated Vehicles on Roads.” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (2020): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2926278.Google Scholar
Cao, G. H. “Comparison of China–US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21, no. 6 (2015), 1609–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–014-9611-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caro, R. A. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York: Random House, 1974.Google Scholar
Cavoukian, A. Security Technologies Enabling Privacy (STEPs): Time for a Paradigm Shift. Toronto, Canada: Information & Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavoukian, A. Whole Body Imaging in Airport Scanners: Building in Privacy by Design. Toronto, Canada: Information & Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2009.Google Scholar
Chakrabortty, Aditya. “Secret Report: Biofuel Caused Food Crisis.” Environment, Guardian, July 3, 2008. www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/jul/03/biofuels.renewableenergy.Google Scholar
Chockalingam, Sabarathinam, Hadžiosmanović, Dina, Pieters, Wolter, Teixeira, André, and van Gelder, Pieter. “Integrated Safety and Security Risk Assessment Methods: A Survey of Key Characteristics and Applications.” In Critical Information Infrastructures Security, edited by Havarneanu, Grigore, Setola, Roberto, Nassopoulos, Hypatia, and Wolthusen, Stephen, 50–62. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71368-7_5.Google Scholar
Chung, K. “Nuclear Power and Public Acceptance.” IAEA Bulletin 32, no. 2 (1990): 13–15.Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark. AI Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Collapsed State Housing in Iranian Quake Shows Corruption: Rouhani.” Reuters, November 15, 2017. www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-quake-rouhani-idUSKBN1DF1O1.Google Scholar
Collingridge, D. The Social Control of Technology. London: Frances Pinter, 1980.Google Scholar
Cooke, Roger M. Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., Dignum, M., Pesch, U., and Taebi, B.. “Responsible Innovation in Energy Projects: Values in the Design of Technologies, Institutions and Stakeholder Interactions.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts and Approaches, edited by Koops, E. J., I. Oosterlaken, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra, , and van den Hoven, J., 183–200. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Discrimination, Artificial Intelligence, and Algorithmic Decision-Making. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2018.Google Scholar
Covello, V. T., and Merkhofer, M. W.. Risk Assessment Methods: Approaches for Assessing Health and Environmental Risks. New York: Plenum Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cowell, R., Bristow, G., and Munday, M.. “Acceptance, Acceptability and Environmental Justice: The Role of Community Benefits in Wind Energy Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54, no. 4 (May 1, 2011): 539–57.Google Scholar
Cruess, Sylvia R., Johnston, Sharon, and Cruess, Richard L.. “‘Profession’: A Working Definition for Medical Educators.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 16, no. 1 (January 1, 2004): 74–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1601_15.Google Scholar
Cuppen, Eefje, Ejderyan, Olivier, Pesch, Udo, Spruit, Shannon, van de Grift, Elisabeth, Correljé, Aad, and Taebi, Behnam. “When Controversies Cascade: Analysing the Dynamics of Public Engagement and Conflict in the Netherlands and Switzerland through ‘Controversy Spillover.’” Energy Research & Social Science 68 (October 1, 2020): 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101593.Google Scholar
Cuppen, Eefje, Pesch, Udo, Remmerswaal, Sanne, and Taanman, Mattijs. “Normative Diversity, Conflict and Transition: Shale Gas in the Netherlands.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145 (August, 2019): 165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.004.Google Scholar
Davies, Alex. “The Unavoidable Folly of Making Humans Train Self-Driving Cars.” Wired, June 22, 2018. www.wired.com/story/uber-crash-arizona-human-train-self-driving-cars/.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. “‘Global Engineering Ethics’: Re-Inventing the Wheel?” In Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, edited by Colleen Murphy, Paolo Gardoni, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad, 69–78. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. “Is Engineering a Profession Everywhere?” Philosophia 37, no. 2 (June 1, 2009): 211–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406–008-9125-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Michael. “Thinking Like an Engineer: The Place of a Code of Ethics in the Practice of a Profession.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, no. 2 (1991): 150–67.Google Scholar
Devine-Wright, P. Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. London: Earthscan, 2011.Google Scholar
Didier, Christelle “Engineering Ethics: European Perspectives.” In Ethics, Science,Technology, and Engineering: A Global Resource, edited by Holbrook, J. B., 87–90. Farmington Hills, MI: MacMillan Reference, 2015.Google Scholar
Didier, Christelle. “Engineering Ethics in France: A Historical Perspective.” Technology in Society 21, no. 4 (1999): 471–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160–791X(99)00029-9.Google Scholar
Dignum, M., Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., Pesch, U., and Taebi, B.. “Contested Technologies and Design for Values: The Case of Shale Gas.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22, no. 4 (2016): 1171–91.Google Scholar
Dignum, Virginia. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6.Google Scholar
Dimitriou, H. T., Ward, E. J., and Wright, P. G.. “Mega Transport Projects – Beyond the ‘Iron Triangle’: Findings from the OMEGA Research Programme.” Progress in Planning 86 (November 1, 2013): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.03.001.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=49013236.Google Scholar
Doorn, Neelke. “How Can Resilient Infrastructures Contribute to Social Justice? Preface to the Special Issue of Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure on Resilience Infrastructures and Social Justice.” Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure 4, no. 3 (2019): 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2019.1574515.Google Scholar
Doorn, Neelke. “Resilience Indicators: Opportunities for Including Distributive Justice Concerns in Disaster Management.” Journal of Risk Research 20, no. 6 (2017): 711–31.Google Scholar
Doorn, Neelke, and Hansson, S. O.. “Design for the Value of Safety.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, edited by van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I., 491–511. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Doorn, N., and Hansson, S. O.. “Should Probabilistic Design Replace Safety Factors?” Philosophy & Technology 24, no. 2 (2011): 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorn, Neelke, Schuurbiers, D., Van de Poel, I., and Gorman, M. E., eds. Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Downer, J. “Disowning Fukushima: Managing the Credibility of Nuclear Reliability Assessment in the Wake of Disaster.” Regulation & Governance 8, no. 3 (2014): 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12029.Google Scholar
Downer, J. “The Unknowable Ceiling of Safety: Three Ways That Nuclear Accidents Escape the Calculus of Risk Assessments.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 35–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Downey, Gary Lee, Lucena, Juan C., Moskal, Barbara M., Parkhurst, Rosamond, Bigley, Thomas, Hays, Chris, Jesiek, Brent K., et al. “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently.” Journal of Engineering Education 95, no. 2 (2006): 107–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00883.x.Google Scholar
Duffey, Romney B. “Sustainable Futures Using Nuclear Energy.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 47, no. 1 (January 1, 2005): 535–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.05.054.Google Scholar
Efrati, Amir. “Uber Finds Deadly Accident Likely Caused by Software Set to Ignore Objects on Road.” The Information, May 7, 2018. www.theinformation.com/articles/uber-finds-deadly-accident-likely-caused-by-software-set-to-ignore-objects-on-road.Google Scholar
Elsinga, Marja, Hoekstra, Joris, Sedighi, Mohamad, and Taebi, Behnam. “Toward Sustainable and Inclusive Housing: Underpinning Housing Policy as Design for Values.” Sustainability 12, no. 5 (January, 2020): 1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051920.Google Scholar
Engel-Hills, Penelope, Winberg, Christine, and Rip, Arie. “Ethics ‘Upfront’: Generating an Organizational Framework for a New University of Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25, no. 6 (2019): 1705–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–019-00140-0.Google Scholar
European Commission. Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and “Autonomous” Systems. Brussels: European Commission – European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, 2018.Google Scholar
European Commission. “On the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.2009.04.23.” Directive 2009/28/EC, 2009. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016PC0767.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation. EEA Report no. 1/2013. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2013.Google Scholar
Evans, Leonard. “Death in Traffic: Why Are the Ethical Issues Ignored?” Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2, no. 1 (2008), art. 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1014.Google Scholar
Ewing, Jack, and Mouawad, Jad. “Directors Say Volkswagen Delayed Informing Them of Trickery.” International Business, New York Times, October 23, 2015. www.nytimes.com/2015/10/24/business/international/directors-say-volkswagen-delayed-informing-them-of-trickery.html.Google Scholar
Fahlquist, Jessica Nihlén, and Roeser, Sabine. “Nuclear Energy, Responsible Risk Communication and Moral Emotions: A Three Level Framework.” Journal of Risk Research 18, no. 3 (2015): 333–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.940594.Google Scholar
Fan, Yinghui, Zhang, Xingwei, and Xie, Xinlu. “Design and Development of a Course in Professionalism and Ethics for CDIO Curriculum in China.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21, no. 5 (2014): 1381–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–014-9592-2.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch. “The Realities of Risk–Cost–Benefit Analysis.” Science 350, no. 6260 (October 30, 2015): aaa6516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa6516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., and Nissenbaum, H.. “Embodying Values in Technology. Theory and Practice.” In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, edited by van den Hoven, J. and Weckert, J., 322–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano, Cowls, Josh, Beltrametti, Monica, Chatila, Raja, Chazerand, Patrice, Dignum, Virginia, Luetge, Christoph, et al. “AI4People – An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28, no. 4 (December 1, 2018): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023–018-9482-5.Google Scholar
Flynn, R. “Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies.” In Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies, edited by Flynn, R. and Bellaby, P., 1–23. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Fogg, B. J. “Now Is Your Chance to Decide What They Will Persuade Us to Do – and How They’ll Do It.” Communications of the ACM 42, no. 5 (1999): 27–29.Google Scholar
Foot, P. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Oxford Review 5 (1967): 5–15.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. “Value-Sensitive Design.” Interactions 3, no. 6 (1996): 16–23.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr. and Borning, A.. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. University of Washington Technical Report 02-12-01. Seattle: University of Washington, 2002.Google Scholar
Gajraj, Randhir S., Singh, Gajendra P., and Kumar, Ashwani. “Third-Generation Biofuel: Algal Biofuels as a Sustainable Energy Source.” In Biofuels: Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Global Warming: Next Generation Biofuels and Role of Biotechnology, edited by Kumar, Ashwani, Ogita, Shinjiro, and Yau, Yuan-Yeu, 307–25. New Delhi: Springer India, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3763-1_17.Google Scholar
Gardoni, P., and Murphy, C.. “Nuclear Energy, the Capability Approach, and the Developing World.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 216–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gips, J. “Toward the Ethical Robot.” In Android Epistemology, edited by Ford, K. M., Glymour, C., and Hayes, P., 243–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Godard, O. “Justification, Limitation, and ALARA as Precursors of the Precautionary Principles.” In Ethics and Radiological Protection, edited by Eggermont, G. and Feltz, B., 133–46. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-Bruylant, 2008.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M., and Rosner, R.. Nuclear Reactors: Generation to Generation. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2011.Google Scholar
Goodall, Noah J. “Away from Trolley Problems and toward Risk Management.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 30, no. 8 (September 13, 2016): 810–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229922.Google Scholar
Goodall, Noah J. “Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes.” Transportation Research Record 2424, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.3141/2424-07.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. “Ethical Principles for Environmental Protection.” In Environmental Philosophy, edited by Elliot, R. and Gare, A., 411–26. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Greenpeace. “Nuclear Power, Unsustainable, Uneconomic, Dirty and Dangerous: A Position Paper.” UN Energy for Sustainable Development, Commission on Sustainable Development, CSD-14, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
Gruen, Lori. Ethics and Animals: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. “Technology Assessment and Design for Values.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, edited by van den, J. Hoven, P. Vermaas, , and Van de Poel, I., 67–86. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. “Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by van den Hoven, J., Doorn, N., Swierstra, T., Koops, B. J., and Romijn, H., 15–31. Cham: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. “Technology Policy between Long-Term Planning Requirements and Short-Ranged Acceptance Problems: New Challenges for Technology Assessment.” In Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society, edited by Grin, J. J., 99–147. Berlin: Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A., and Rösch, C.. “Sustainability Assessment of Energy Technologies: Towards an Integrative Framework.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–10.Google Scholar
Gui, M. M., Lee, K. T., and Bhatia, S.. “Feasibility of Edible Oil vs. Non-Edible Oil vs. Waste Edible Oil as Biodiesel Feedstock.” Energy 33, no. 11 (November 1, 2008): 1646–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.06.002.Google Scholar
Gunkel, David J. The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Halkes, Job. “De A4, het duurste stukje snelweg van Nederland.” Metro Nieuws, November 11, 2015. www.metronieuws.nl/binnenland/rotterdam/2015/11/de-a4-het-duurste-stukje-snelweg-van-nederland.Google Scholar
Hammer, W. Product Safety Management and Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W. M. “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?” The American Economic Review 81, no. 3 (1991): 635–47.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. “An Agenda for the Ethics of Risk.” In The Ethics of Technological Risk, edited by Asveld, L. and Roeser, S., 11–23. London: Earthscan, 2009.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. “Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance.” Erkenntnis 59, no. 3 (2003): 291–309.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. “Informed Consent out of Context.” Journal of Business Ethics 63, no. 2 (2006): 149–54.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. “Philosophical Problems in Cost–Benefit Analysis.” Economics and Philosophy 23, no. 2 (2007): 163–83.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. “The Precautionary Principle.” In Handbook of Safety Principles, edited by Möller, N., Hansson, S. O., Holmberg, J. E., and Rollenhagen, C., 258–83. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2018.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. “Risk and Safety in Technology.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by Meijers, A., 1069–1102. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jason Edward. “Dear America, I Saw You Naked.” Politico Magazine, January 30, 2014. www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/tsa-screener-confession-102912.html.Google Scholar
Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M., Rabins, M. J., James, R., and Englehardt, E.. Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 5th ed. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2014.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Andrew J. “Serious Safety Lapses Led to Uber’s Fatal Self-Driving Crash, New Documents Suggest.” Verge, November 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Heikoop, Daniël D., Hagenzieker, Marjan, Mecacci, Giulio, Calvert, Simeon, Santoni de Sio, Filippo, and van Arem, Bart. “Human Behaviour with Automated Driving Systems: A Quantitative Framework for Meaningful Human Control.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20, no. 6 (November 2, 2019): 711–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2019.1574931.Google Scholar
Henwood, K., and Pidgeon, N.. “Gender, Ethical Voices, and UK Nuclear Energy Policy in the Post-Fukushima Era.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 67–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hevelke, Alexander, and Nida-Rümelin, Julian. “Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21, no. 3 (2015): 619–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–014-9565-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillerbrand, R. “The Role of Nuclear Energy in the Future Energy Landscape: Energy Scenarios, Nuclear Energy, and Sustainability.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 231–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hollnagel, E. “Resilience: The Challenge of the Unstable.” In Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, edited by Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., and Leveson, N. C., 9–18. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-38166.Google Scholar
Horn, Michael. Testimony of Michael Horn, President and CEO of Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. The House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 2015. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF02/20151008/104046/HHRG-114-IF02-Wstate-HornM-20151008.pdf?rel=mas.Google Scholar
IAEA. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by the Director General. Vienna: IAEA, 2015.Google Scholar
IAEA. IAEA Safety Glossary: Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection. Vienna: IAEA, 2007.Google Scholar
IAEA. Implications of Partitioning and Transmutation in Radioactive Waste Management. Vienna: IAEA, 2004. www.iaea.org/publications/7112/implications-of-partitioning-and-transmutation-in-radioactive-waste-management.Google Scholar
IAEA. Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development. Vienna: IAEA, 2006.Google Scholar
IAEA. Safety Related Terms for Advanced Nuclear Plants. Vienna: IAEA, 1991.Google Scholar
IAEA, Euratom, FAO, IAEA, ILO, IMO, OECD-NEA, PAHO, UNEP, and WHO. Fundamental Safety Principles. IAEA Safety Standards Series, vol. SF1. Vienna: Euratom, FAO, IAEA, ILO, IMO, OECD-NEA, PAHO, UNEP, and WHO, 2006.Google Scholar
ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP 37, nos. 2–4 (2007).Google Scholar
ICRP. Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Optimization of Radiation Protection. ICRP Publication 37. Annals of the ICRP 10, nos. 2–3 (1983).Google Scholar
ICRP. Ethical Foundations of the System of Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 138. Annals of the ICRP 47, no. 1 (2018).Google Scholar
ICRP. Protection of the Environment under Different Exposure Situations. ICRP Publication 124. Annals of the ICRP 43, no. 1 (2014).Google Scholar
ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Annals of the ICRP 21, nos. 1–3 (1991).Google Scholar
IJsselsteijn, Wijnand, de Kort, Yvonne, Midden, Cees, Eggen, Berry, and van den Hoven, Elise. “Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene.” In Persuasive Technology, edited by IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A., de Kort, Yvonne A. W., Midden, Cees, Eggen, Berry, and van den Hoven, Elise, 1–5. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
“Iran Quake Survivors Plead for Help.” Middle East, BBC News, November 14, 2017. www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-41977714.Google Scholar
International Risk Governance Council. Planning Adaptive Risk Regulation. Lausanne: International Risk Governance Council, 2016.Google Scholar
Irvine, D. “Airport Officials Get X-ray Vision.” CNN, March 6, 2007. http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/03/06/bt.backscatterxray/index.html.Google Scholar
Ishizuka, H. “Official Storage of Contaminated Soil Begins in Fukushima.” Asahi Shimbun, October 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Jacquet, J., and Jamieson, D.. “Soft but Significant Power in the Paris Agreement.” Nature Climate Change 6, no. 7 (July, 2016): 643–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3006.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Janaun, Jidon, and Ellis, Naoko. “Perspectives on Biodiesel as a Sustainable Fuel.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 4 (May 1, 2010): 1312–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.12.011.Google Scholar
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., and Rehner, R.. “Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review.” Energy Research & Social Science 11 (2016): 174–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Kirsten E. H., Spruit, Shannon, Milchram, Christine, Höffken, Johanna, and Taebi, Behnam. “Synthesizing Value Sensitive Design, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review.” Energy Research & Social Science 69 (November 1, 2020): 101727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101727.Google Scholar
Jing, Shan, and Doorn, Neelke. “Engineers’ Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26, no. 1 (2020): 233–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–019-00093-4.Google Scholar
Johnson, Deborah G. “Computer Systems: Moral Entities but Not Moral Agents.” Ethics and Information Technology 8, no. 4 (November 1, 2006): 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676–006-9111-5.Google Scholar
Jordan, S. R., and Gray, P. W.. “Responsible Conduct of Research Training for Engineers: Adopting Research Ethics Training for Engineering Graduate Students.” In Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, edited by Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Charles E, Harris Jr., and Masad, Eyad, 213–28. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Kasperkevic, Jana, and Dominic Rushe. “Head of VW America Says He Feels Personally Deceived.” Business, Guardian, October 8, 2015. www.theguardian.com/business/live/2015/oct/08/head-of-vw-america-testifies-us-congress-emissions-live-updates.Google Scholar
Kastenberg, W. E. “Ethics, Risk, and Safety Culture: Reflections on Fukushima and Beyond.” Journal of Risk Research 18, no. 3 (2015): 304–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.896399.Google Scholar
Keller, Paul E., McMakin, Douglas L., Sheen, David M., McKinnon, A. D., and Summet, Jay W.. “Privacy Algorithm for Airport Passenger Screening Portal.” In Applications and Science of Computational Intelligence III, edited by Priddy, Kevin L., Keller, Paul E., and Fogel, David B., 4055:476–83. Orlando, FL: SPIE, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.380602.Google Scholar
Keller, W., and Modarres, M.. “A Historical Overview of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Development and Its Use in the Nuclear Power Industry: A Tribute to the Late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 89, no. 3 (2005): 271–85.Google Scholar
Kelman, S. “Cost–Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique.” Regulations (January–February, 1981): 33–40.Google Scholar
Kermisch, C, and Taebi, B.. “Sustainability, Ethics and Nuclear Energy: Escaping the Dichotomy.” Sustainability 9, no. 3 (2017): 446.Google Scholar
Klein, A. “Credit Denial in the Age of AI.” Brookings Institution, 2019. www.brookings.edu/research/credit-denial-in-the-age-of-ai/.Google Scholar
Klinke, A., and Renn, O.. “Adaptive and Integrative Governance on Risk and Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk Research 15, no. 3 (2012): 273–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.636838.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Kara Maria, and Kweon, Young-Jun. “Driver Injury Severity: An Application of Ordered Probit Models.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 34, no. 3 (May 1, 2002): 313–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001–4575(01)00028-8.Google Scholar
Kroes, P., and Verbeek, P. P.. “Introduction: The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts.” In The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts, edited by Kroes, P. and Verbeek, P. P., 1–9. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Krütli, P., Törnblom, K., Wallimann-Helmer, I., and Stauffacher, M.. “Distributive versus Procedural Justice in Nuclear Waste Repository Siting.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 119–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kultgen, John, and Alexander-Smith, Robin. “The Ideological Use of Professional Codes.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 1, no. 3 (1982): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulynych, B., Overdorf, R., Troncoso, C., and Gürses, S.. “POTs: Protective Optimization Technologies.” ArXiv (December, 2019).Google Scholar
Ladd, John. “Bhopal: An Essay on Moral Responsibility and Civic Virtue.” Journal of Social Philosophy 22, no. 1 (1991): 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1991.tb00022.x.Google Scholar
Ladd, John. “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion.” In Ethical Issues in Engineering, edited by Johnson, D. G., 130–36. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
Lambert, Fred. “Tesla’s Latest Autopilot Update Comes with More ‘Nag’ to Make Sure Drivers Keep Their Hands on the Wheel.” Electrek (blog), June 11, 2018. https://electrek.co/2018/06/11/tesla-autopilot-update-nag-hands-wheel/.Google Scholar
Landström, C., and Bergmans, A.. “Long-Term Repository Governance: A Socio-Technical Challenge.” Journal of Risk Research 18, nos. 3–4 (2015): 378–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.913658.Google Scholar
Laufer, William S. “Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing.” Journal of Business Ethics 43, no. 3 (2003): 253–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022962719299.Google Scholar
Lehtveer, M., and Hedenus, F.. “Nuclear Power as a Climate Mitigation Strategy – Technology and Proliferation Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 18, no. 3 (2015): 273–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.889194.Google Scholar
Leung, Dennis Y. C., Xuan, Wu, and Leung, M. K. H.. “A Review on Biodiesel Production Using Catalyzed Transesterification.” Applied Energy 87, no. 4 (April 1, 2010): 1083–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006.Google Scholar
Liao, Kuei-Hsien. “A Theory on Urban Resilience to Floods – A Basis for Alternative Planning Practices.” Ecology and Society 17, no. 4 (2012). www.jstor.org/stable/26269244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, P. “Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars.” In Autonomous Driving. Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, edited by M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, , and Winner, H., 69–85. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Open, 2015.Google Scholar
Löfquist, L. “After Fukushima: Nuclear Power and Societal Choice.” Journal of Risk Research 18, no. 3 (2015): 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.841730.Google Scholar
Loyalka, Prashant, Carnoy, Martin, Froumin, Isak, Dossani, Raffiq, Tilak, J. B., and Yang, Po. “Factors Affecting the Quality of Engineering Education in the Four Largest Emerging Economies.” Higher Education 68, no. 6 (December 1, 2014): 977–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9755-8.Google Scholar
Luegenbiehl, H. C. “Ethical Autonomy and Engineering in a Cross-Cultural Context.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8, no. 1 (March 1, 2004): 57–78. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20048110.Google Scholar
Luegenbiehl, H. C. “Ethical Principles for Engineers in a Global Environment.” In Philosophy and Engineering, edited by Van de Poel, I. and Goldberg, D., 147–59. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Luegenbiehl, H. C., and Clancy, R. F.. Global Engineering Ethics. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017.Google Scholar
Lynn, Leonard, and Salzman, Hal. “Engineers, Firms and Nations: Ethical Dilemmas in the New Global Environment.” In Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, edited by Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad, 15–33. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Malle, Bertram F., Scheutz, Matthias, Arnold, Thomas, Voiklis, John, and Cusimano, Corey. “Sacrifice One for the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, 117–24. New York: ACM, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696458.Google Scholar
Martin, W. M., and Schinzinger, R.. Ethics in Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.Google Scholar
Mata, Teresa M., Martins, António A., and Caetano, Nidia. S.. “Microalgae for Biodiesel Production and Other Applications: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 1 (January 1, 2010): 217–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020.Google Scholar
Matthias, Andreas. “The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata.” Ethics and Information Technology 6, no. 3 (September 1, 2004): 175–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676–004-3422-1.Google Scholar
McGinn, Robert. The Ethical Engineer: Contemporary Concepts and Cases. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W.. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Mecacci, Giulio, and Santoni de Sio, Filippo. “Meaningful Human Control as Reason-Responsiveness: The Case of Dual-Mode Vehicles.” Ethics and Information Technology (December 6, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676–019-09519-w.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. “On Liberty.” In On Liberty and Other Essays, edited by Gray, J., 1–128. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. First published in 1859.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. “Utilitarianism.” In On Liberty and Other Essays, edited by Gray, J., 129–201. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. First published in 1861.Google Scholar
Minarick, J. W., and Kukielka, C. A.. Precursors to Potential Severe Core Damage Accidents, 1969–1979: A Status Report. Oak Ridge, TN: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1982.Google Scholar
Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Allo, Patrick, Taddeo, Mariarosaria, Wachter, Sandra, and Floridi, Luciano. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 2 (December 2016): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.Google Scholar
Möller, Niklas, and Ove Hansson, Sven. “Principles of Engineering Safety: Risk and Uncertainty Reduction.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93, no. 6 (June 1, 2008): 798–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.031.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Risako, Ash, John, and Hope, Chris. “Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice.” Journal of Business Ethics 62, no. 4 (2005): 315–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551–005-0274-5.Google Scholar
Morose, Gregory. “The 5 Principles of ‘Design for Safer Nanotechnology.’” Journal of Cleaner Production 18, no. 3 (February 1, 2010): 285–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouter, Niek, Annema, Jan Anne, and van Wee, Bert. “Attitudes towards the Role of Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Decision-Making Process for Spatial-Infrastructure Projects: A Dutch Case Study.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 58 (December 1, 2013): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.006.Google Scholar
Mulder, Max, Borst, Clark, and van Paassen, Marinus M.. “Improving Operator Situation Awareness through Ecological Interfaces: Lessons from Aviation.” In Computer–Human Interaction Research and Applications, edited by Holzinger, Andreas, Silva, Hugo Plácido, and Helfert, Markus, 20–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32965-5_2.Google Scholar
Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad, eds. Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad. “Introduction.” In Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, edited by Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad, 1–11. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Murrugarra, R. I., and Wallace, W. A.. “A Cross Cultural Comparison of Engineering Ethics Education: Chile and United States.” In Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, edited by Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad, 189–211. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States. Washington, DC: National Research Council (NRC), 2006. www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4912&page=R1.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1966.Google Scholar
New Zealand Government. “Guide to Social Cost Benefit Analysis.” The Treasury, New Zealand Government, July 27, 2015. https://treasury.govt.nz/publications/guide/guide-social-cost-benefit-analysis.Google Scholar
Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. P. Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles: For Oil, Gas, Chemical and Related Facilities. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: William Andrew, 2014.Google Scholar
Nolt, J. “Non-nnthropocentric Nuclear Energy Ethics.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 157–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
“Notre-Dame-des-Landes: Does France Really Need a New Airport Hub in the West?” The Local, January 17, 2018. www.thelocal.fr/20180117/does-france-really-need-a-new-airport-hub-in-the-west.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Janusz, Hoshino, Tsuyoshi, Dodson, John, Atanacio, Armand J., Ionescu, Mihail, Peterson, Vanessa, Prince, Kathryn E., et al. “Towards Sustainable Energy: Generation of Hydrogen Fuel Using Nuclear Energy.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41, no. 30 (August 10, 2016): 12812–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.054.Google Scholar
NSPE. NSPE Ethics Reference Guide. Alexandria, VA: National Society of Professional Enginners (NSPE), 2017.Google Scholar
Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Committee. The National Diet of Japan: The Official Report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Executive Summary. Japan: Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC), 2012.Google Scholar
Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor Safety Study. An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants. WASH-1400-MR; NUREG-75/014-MR. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1975.Google Scholar
Nuclear Regulatory CommissionSafety Goals for the Operations of Nuclear Power Plants: Policy Statement; Republication. 51 FR 30028. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 1986.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Biofuel: Ethical Issues. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2011.Google Scholar
Nyborg, Karine. “Some Norwegian Politicians’ Use of Cost–Benefit Analysis.” Public Choice 95, no. 3 (June 1, 1998): 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005012509068.Google Scholar
Nyholm, Sven. “Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24, no. 4 (2018): 1201–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–017-9943-x.Google Scholar
Nyholm, Sven. “The Ethics of Crashes with Self-Driving Cars: A Roadmap, II.” Philosophy Compass 13, no. 7 (2018): e12506. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12506.Google Scholar
O’Brien, G., and Keefe, P. O.. “The Future of Nuclear Power in Europe: A Response.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 63, no. 2 (April 1, 2006): 121–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230600661619.Google Scholar
Odgaard, T., Kelly, C. E., and Laird, J.. “Current Practice in Project Appraisal in Europe: Deliverable 1 of the HAETCO Project,” 2005. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2502/1/Current_practice_in_project_appraisal_uploadable.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD. Addressing Societal Challenges Using Interdisciplinary Research. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020.Google Scholar
OECD. Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Development and Policy Use. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/cost-benefit-analysis-and-the-environment_9789264085169-en#page9.Google Scholar
OECD. Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010055-en.Google Scholar
OECD. Guidelines for Resilience Systems Analysis. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2014.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2008.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD, 2004.Google Scholar
Ohnsman, Alan. “Waymo CEO on Uber Crash: Our Self-Driving Car Would Have Avoided Pedestrian.” Forbes, March 24, 2018. www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2018/03/24/waymo-ceo-on-uber-crash-our-self-driving-car-would-have-avoided-pedestrian/.Google Scholar
O’Kane, Sean. “Volkswagen America’s CEO Blames Software Engineers for Emissions Cheating Scandal.” Verge, October 8, 2015. www.theverge.com/2015/10/8/9481651/volkswagen-congressional-hearing-diesel-scandal-fault.Google Scholar
O’Kane, Sean. “VW Executive Given the Maximum Prison Sentence for His Role in Dieselgate.” Verge, December 6, 2017. www.theverge.com/2017/12/6/16743308/volkswagen-oliver-schmidt-sentence-emissions-scandal-prison.Google Scholar
Oosterlaken, Ilse. “Applying Value Sensitive Design (VSD) to Wind Turbines and Wind Parks: An Exploration.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21, no. 2 (2015): 359–79.Google Scholar
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., and Guston, D.. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Owen, R., Bessant, J., and Heintz, M., 27–50. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Google Scholar
Panikkar, B., and Sandler, R.. “Nuclear Energy, Justice and Power: The Case of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 141–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pasquale, F. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Patil, Vishwanath, Tran, Khanh-Quang, and Ragnar Giselrød, Hans. “Towards Sustainable Production of Biofuels from Microalgae.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 9, no. 7 (July, 2008): 1188–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9071188.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Pesch, U., Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., and Taebi, B.. “Energy Justice and Controversies: Formal and Informal Assessment in Energy Projects.” Energy Policy 109 (2017): 825–34.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., Corner, A., and Vaughan, N.. “Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project.” Nature Climate Change 3, no. 5 (May, 2013): 451–57.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, S., and Harvey, M.. “Battles over Biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the Politics of Markets.” Sociological Research Online 15, no. 3 (2010): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2192.Google Scholar
Pinzi, S., Garcia, I. L., Lopez-Gimenez, F. J., Luque de Castro, M. D., Dorado, G., and Dorado, M. P.. “The Ideal Vegetable Oil-Based Biodiesel Composition: A Review of Social, Economical and Technical Implications.” Energy & Fuels 23, no. 5 (May 21, 2009): 2325–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef801098a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinssot, C., Bourg, S., Grandjean, S., and Boullis, B.. “The Sustainability, a Relevant Approach for Defining the Roadmap for Future Nuclear Fuel Cycles.” Procedia Chemistry 21 (2016): 536–44.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A., and Weisbach, D.. Climate Change Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Priemus, H., Flyvbjerg, B., and van Wee, B., eds. Decision-Making on Mega-projects: Cost–Benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2008.Google Scholar
Proske, D. “Comparison of Computed and Observed Probabilities of Failure and Core Damage Frequencies.” In 14th International Probabilistic Workshop, edited by Caspeele, Robby, Taerwe, Luc, and Proske, Dirk, 109–22. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_8.Google Scholar
Puzzanghera, J., and Hirsch, J.. “VW Exec Blames ‘a Couple of’ Rogue Engineers for Emissions Scandal.” Los Angeles Times, October 28, 2015. www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-vw-hearing-20151009-story.html.Google Scholar
Radder, H. “Why Technologies Are Inherently Normative.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A. Meijer, 9:887–921.Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50037-9.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan. Risk and Precaution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Reason, James. “Safety Paradoxes and Safety Culture.” Injury Control and Safety Promotion 7, no. 1 (March 1, 2000): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1076/1566-0974(200003)7:1;1-V;FT003.Google Scholar
Robaey, Z., and Simons, A.. “Responsible Management of Social Experiments: Challenges for Policymaking.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts and Approaches, edited by Koops, E. J., Oosterlaken, I., Romijn, H. A., Swierstra, T. E., and van den Hoven, J., 87–103. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Robbins, Scott. “A Misdirected Principle with a Catch: Explicability for AI.” Minds and Machines, October 15, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023–019-09509-3.Google Scholar
Robbins, Scott, and Henschke, Adam. “The Value of Transparency: Bulk Data and Authoritarianism.” Surveillance & Society 15, nos. 3–4 (August 9, 2017): 582–89. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6606.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Elisabeth. “As Biofuel Demand Grows, So Do Guatemala’s Hunger Pangs.” Science, New York Times, January 5, 2013. www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/science/earth/in-fields-and-markets-guatemalans-feel-squeeze-of-biofuel-demand.html.Google Scholar
Rosen-Zvi, I. “You Are Too Soft: What Can Corporate Social Responsibility Do for Climate Change.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 12 (2011): 527–70.Google Scholar
“Rouhani Vows Action over Quake Collapses.” Middle East, BBC News, November 14, 2017. www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-41988176.Google Scholar
Royal Academy of Engineering. Sustainability of Liquid Biofuels. London: Royal Academy of Engineering, 2017.Google Scholar
Royal Society. Machine Learning: The Power and Promise of Computers That Learn by Example. London: Royal Society, 2017.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Jared. “Consequences and Limits: A Critique of Consequentialism.” Macalester Journal of Philosophy 17, no. 1 (March 28, 2011): 64–76.Google Scholar
Sandin, P. “Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 5, no. 5 (1999): 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039991289185.Google Scholar
Santoni de Sio, Filippo, and van den Hoven, Jeroen. “Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5, art. 15 (2018): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. “The Role of Consent in the Legitimation of Risky Activity.” In To Breathe Freely: Risk, Consent, and Air, edited by Gibson, M., 75–88. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1985.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. “A Place for Cost–Benefit Analysis*.” Philosophical Issues 11, no. 1 (2001): 148–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2237.2001.tb00042.x.Google Scholar
Schofield, Hugh. “Battle for a New Nantes Airport.” Europe, BBC News, November 27, 2012. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-20502702.Google Scholar
Schulz, T. L. “Westinghouse AP1000 Advanced Passive Plant.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 236, no. 14–16 (2006): 1547–57.Google Scholar
Seeger, M. W., and J. H. Steven. “Legal versus Ethical Arguments: Contexts for Corporate Social Responsibility.” In The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by May, Steven K., Cheney, George, and Roper, Juliet, 155–66. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. The Evolution of Cost–Benefit Analysisin U.S. Regulatory Decision-Making. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, Working Paper no. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Jerusalem Forum on Regulation & Governance, 2010.Google Scholar
Sharkey, Amanda. “Can Robots Be Responsible Moral Agents? And Why Should We Care?” Connection Science 29, no. 3 (July 3, 2017): 210–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2017.1313815.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. “Rights to Know and the Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island Accidents.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 53–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. What Will Work: Fighting Climate Change with Renewable Energy, Not Nuclear Power. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., and Dipti, Singh. “Biodiesel Production through the Use of Different Sources and Characterization of Oils and Their Esters as the Substitute of Diesel: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 1 (2010): 200–16.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Consequentialism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), edited by Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/consequentialism.Google Scholar
Snow, Jacob. “Amazon’s Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress with Mugshots.” American Civil Liberties Union, July 26, 2018. www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-technology/surveillance-technologies/amazons-face-recognition-falsely-matched-28.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K. Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., and Dworkin, M. H.. Global Energy Justice: Problems, Principles, and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Spahn, Andreas. “And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion … ? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18, no. 4 (2012): 633–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–011-9278-y.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Robert. “Killer Robots.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 24, no. 1 (2007): 62–77.Google Scholar
Steijn, W. M. P., Kampen, J. N. Van, Beek, D. Van der, Groeneweg, J., and Van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M.. “An Integration of Human Factors into Quantitative Risk Analysis Using Bayesian Belief Networks towards Developing a ‘QRA+.’” Safety Science 122 (February 1, 2020): 104514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104514.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jack. “Tesla’s Self-Driving Autopilot Involved in Another Deadly Crash.” Wired, March 31, 2018. www.wired.com/story/tesla-autopilot-self-driving-crash-california/.Google Scholar
Stilgoe, Jack. Who’s Driving Innovation? New Technologies and the Collaborative State. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.Google Scholar
Stilgoe, Jack, Owen, Richard, and Macnaghten, Phil. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42, no. 9 (November 1, 2013): 1568–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. “Cost Benefit Analysis and the Environment.” Ethics 115 (2005): 351–85.Google Scholar
Surgrue, Noreen M., and McCarthy, Timothy G.. “Engineering Decisions in a Global Context and Social Choice.” In Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, edited by Murphy, Colleen, Gardoni, Paolo, Bashir, Hassan, Harris, Charles E. Jr., and Masad, Eyad, 79–90. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Synolakis, C., and Kânoğlu, U.. “The Fukushima Accident Was Preventable.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 373, no. 2053 (October 28, 2015): 20140379. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0379.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam. “Bridging the Gap between Social Acceptance and Ethical Acceptability.” Risk Analysis 37, no. 10 (2017): 1817–27.Google Scholar
Taebi, B. “Intergenerational Risks of Nuclear Energy.” In Handbook of Risk Theory. Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., and Peterson, M., 295–318. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
Taebi, B. “Justice and Good Governance in Nuclear Disasters.” In Ethics and Law for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear & Explosive Crises, edited by O’Mathúna, D. and de Miguel Beriain, I., 65–74. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology. Cham: Springer, 2019.Google Scholar
Taebi, B. “Moral Dilemmas of Uranium and Thorium Fuel Cycles.” In Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management, edited by Oughton, D. and Hansson, S. O., 259–80. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.Google Scholar
Taebi, B. “The Morally Desirable Option for Nuclear Power Production.” Philosophy & Technology 24, no. 2 (2011): 169–92.Google Scholar
Taebi, B. “Sustainable Energy and the Controversial Case of Nuclear Power.” In Sustainability Ethics: 5 Questions, edited by Raffaelle, R., Robison, W., and Selinger, E., 233–42. Copenhagen: Automatic Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., Dignum, M., and Pesch, U.. “Responsible Innovation and an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1, no. 1 (2014): 118–24.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, van den Hoven, Jeroen, and Bird, Stephanie J.. “The Importance of Ethics in Modern Universities of Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25, no. 6 (2019): 1625–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00164-6.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, and Kadak, A. C.. “Intergenerational Considerations Affecting the Future of Nuclear Power: Equity as a Framework for Assessing Fuel Cycles.” Risk Analysis 30, no. 9 (2010): 1341–62.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, and Kloosterman, J. L.. “Design for Values in Nuclear Technology.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, edited by van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I., 805–29. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Taebi, B., and Kloosterman, J. L.. “To Recycle or Not to Recycle? An Intergenerational Approach to Nuclear Fuel Cycles.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14, no. 2 (2008): 177–200.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, Kwakkel, J., and Kermisch, C.. “Governing Climate Risks in the Face of Normative Uncertainties.” WIREs Climate Change 11, no. 5 (2020): e666. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.666.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, Roeser, S., and Van de Poel, I.. “The Ethics of Nuclear Power: Social Experiments, Intergenerational Justice, and Emotions.” Energy Policy 51 (2012): 202–06.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, and Roeser, S., eds. The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, and Safari, A.. “On Effectiveness and Legitimacy of ‘Shaming’ as a Strategy for Combatting Climate Change.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23, no. 5 (2017): 1289–1306.Google Scholar
Taebi, Behnam, and Van de Poel, I.. “Socio-Technical Challenges of Nuclear Power Production and Waste Disposal in the Post-Fukushima Era: Editors’ Overview.” Journal of Risk Research 18, no. 3 (2015): 267–72.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R.. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. “Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands.” American Political Science Review 74, no. 4 (December, 1980): 905–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954312.Google Scholar
Tomei, Julia. “The Sustainability of Sugarcane-Ethanol Systems in Guatemala: Land, Labour and Law.” In “Implementing Sustainable Bioenergy Systems: Insights from the 2014 RCUK International Bioenergy Conference.” Special issue, Biomass and Bioenergy 82 (November 1, 2015): 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.018.Google Scholar
Tomei, Julia, and Diaz-Chavez, Rocio. “Guatemala.” In Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by Solomon, Barry D. and Bailis, Robert, 179–201. New York: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9275-7_8.Google Scholar
“Trump Dismisses US Climate Change Report.” US & Canada, BBC News, November 26, 2018. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46351940.Google Scholar
Tuazon, D., and Gnansounou, E.. “Towards an Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Biorefineries.” In Life-Cycle Assessment of Biorefineries, edited by Gnansounou, Edgard and Pandey, Ashok, 259–301. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-444-63585-3.00010-3.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Can We Design for Well-Being?” In The Good Life in a Technological Age, edited by Brey, Philip, Briggle, Adam, and Spence, Edward, 295–306. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Changing Technologies: A Comparative Study of Eight Processes of Transformation of Technological Regimes” (PhD dissertation, University of Twente, 1998).Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “A Coherentist View on the Relation between Social Acceptance and Moral Acceptability of Technology.” In Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn, edited by Franssen, M., Vermaas, P. E., Kroes, P., and Meijers, A. W. M., 177–93. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol. 23. Switzerland: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_11.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Conflicting Values in Design for Values.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, edited by van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I., 89–116. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Design for Value Change.” Ethics and Information Technology (June 26, 2018): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676–018-9461-9.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22, no. 3 (2016): 667–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–015-9724-3.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Morally Experimenting with Nuclear Energy.” In The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, edited by Taebi, B. and Roeser, S., 179–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Nuclear Energy as a Social Experiment.” Ethics, Policy & Environment 14, no. 3 (2011): 285–90.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Translating Values into Design Requirements.” In Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, edited by Michelfelder, D. P., McCarthy, N., and Goldberg, D. E., 253–66. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. “Values in Engineering Design.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by Meijer, A., 973–1006. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I., and Robaey, Z.. “Safe-by-Design: From Safety to Responsibility.” NanoEthics 11, no. 3 (December 1, 2017): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569–017-0301-x.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I., and Royakkers, L. M. M.. Ethics, Technology and Engineering. An Introduction. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. D.. “Introduction.” In Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands, edited by Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. D., 1–11. New York and London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. D., eds. Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands. New York and London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, J. “Responsible Innovation: A New Look at Technology and Ethics.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by van den Hoven, J., Doorn, N., Swierstra, T., Koops, B. J., and Romijn, H., 3–13. Cham: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, J. “Value Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Owen, R., Bessant, J., and Heintz, M., 75–83. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2013.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, J., Jacob, K., Nielsen, L., Roure, F., Rudze, L., and Stilgoe, J.. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation: Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission, 2013.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, J., Lokhorst, G.-J., and Van de Poel, I.. “Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18, no. 1 (2012): 143–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–011-9277-z.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I.. “Design for Values: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, edited by van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I., 1–6. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I.,, eds. Handbook of Ethics and Values in Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, P. “On the Risk-Informed Regulation in the Safety against External Hazards.” In Handbook of Safety Principles, edited by Möller, N., Hansson, S. O., Holmberg, J. E., and Rollenhagen, C., 417–33. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2018.Google Scholar
Van Wee, B. “How Suitable Is CBA for the Ex-ante Evaluation of Transport Projects and Policies? A Discussion from the Perspective of Ethics.” Transport Policy 19, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.07.001.Google Scholar
Van Wee, B. Transport and Ethics: Ethics and the Evaluation of Transport Policies and Projects. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
Vasen, F. “Responsible Innovation in Developing Countries: An Enlarged Agenda.” In Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda?, edited by Asveld, L., van Dam-Mieras, R., Swierstra, T., Lavrijssen, S., Linse, K., and van den Hoven, J., 93–109. Cham: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P. P. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Voiklis, John, Kim, Boyoung, Cusimano, Corey, and Malle, Bertram F.. “Moral Judgments of Human vs. Robot Agents.” In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 775–80, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745207.Google Scholar
Volkswagen. Volkswagen Group Code of Conduct. Version 10/2017. Wolfsburg, Germany: Volkswagen, 2017.Google Scholar
Von Schomberg, R. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Brussels: European Commission, 2011.Google Scholar
Von Schomberg, R. “A Vision for Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Owen, R., Bessant, J., and Heintz, M., 51–74. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Google Scholar
Walker, G. “Beyond Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the Multiple Spatialities of Environmental Justice.” Antipode 41, no. 4 (September 1, 2009): 614–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x.Google Scholar
Wallach, W., and Allen, C.. Moral Machines. Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wang, Qian, and Yan, Ping. “Development of Ethics Education in Science and Technology in Technical Universities in China.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25, no. 6 (2019): 1721–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–019-00156-6.Google Scholar
Watson, M., and Bulkeley, H.. “Just Waste? Municipal Waste Management and the Politics of Environmental Justice.” Local Environment 10, no. 4 (2005): 411–26.Google Scholar
Weil, V. M. “Professional Standards: Can They Shape Practice in an International Context?” Science and Engineering Ethics 4, no. 3 (1998): 303–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0022-1.Google Scholar
Weil, V. M. “The Rise of Engineering Ethics.” Technology in Society 6, no. 4 (January 1, 1984): 341–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(84)90028-9.Google Scholar
Weinberg, A. M., and Spiewak, I.. “Inherently Safe Reactors and a Second Nuclear Era.” Science 224 (1984): 1398–1402.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Joe, and Bakker, Ryan. “Let Them Eat Cake: Food Prices, Domestic Policy and Social Unrest.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32, no. 3 (2015): 309–26.Google Scholar
Wever, R., and Vogtländer, J.. “Design for the Value of Sustainability.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, edited by van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and Van de Poel, I., 513–49. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
White, Geoff. “Police ‘Miss’ Chances to Improve Face Tech.” Technology, BBC News, May 13, 2019. www.bbc.com/news/technology-48222017.Google Scholar
Wigley, D. C., and Shrader-Frechette, K.. “Environmental Justice: A Louisiana Case Study.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9, no. 1 (1996): 61–82.Google Scholar
Willsher, Kim. “France Abandons Plan for €580m Airport and Orders Squatters Off Site.” World News, Guardian, January 17, 2018. www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/17/france-abandons-plan-for-580m-airport-in-west-of-country.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109, no. 1 (1980): 121–36.Google Scholar
Wong, Loong. “Revisiting Rights and Responsibility: The Case of Bhopal.” Social Responsibility Journal 4, nos. 1–2 (2008): 143–57.Google Scholar
Wong, P.-H. “Global Engineering Ethics.” In Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, edited by Michelfelder, D. M. and Doorn, N., 620–29. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Wong, P.-H. “Responsible Innovation for Decent Nonliberal Peoples: A Dilemma?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3, no. 2 (May 3, 2016): 154–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford: World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987.Google Scholar
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Bürer, M. J.. “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept.” Energy Policy 35, no. 5 (2007): 2683–91.Google Scholar
Wynsberghe, Aimee van, and Robbins, Scott. “Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25, no. 3 (2019): 719–35.Google Scholar
Yap, B. “Blowback over Japanese Plan to Reuse Tainted Soil From Fukushima.” Bloomberg Environment, June 14, 2018. https://www.bna.com%2Fblowback-japanese-plan-n73014476527%2F.Google Scholar
Zhu, Q. “Engineering Ethics Studies in China: Dialogue between Traditionalism and Modernism.” Engineering Studies 2, no. 2 (August 1, 2010): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.490271.Google Scholar
Zhu, Q, and Jesiek, B. K.. “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches (Paper ID #19721).” In Proceedings of the 124th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017. https://peer.asee.org/28252.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Behnam Taebi
  • Book: Ethics and Engineering
  • Online publication: 14 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822784.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Behnam Taebi
  • Book: Ethics and Engineering
  • Online publication: 14 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822784.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Behnam Taebi
  • Book: Ethics and Engineering
  • Online publication: 14 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822784.012
Available formats
×