Book contents
- Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture
- Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustration and Tables
- Places of Original Publication
- Preface
- Editions and Abbreviations
- Introduction to Volume II: Comedy, Herodotus, Hellenistic and Imperial Greek Poetry, the Novels
- 1 Who is Dicaeopolis? (1988)
- 2 Marginalia Obsceniora: Some Problems in Aristophanes’ Wasps (1990)
- 3 Wine in Old Comedy (1995)
- 4 Ionian Iambus and Attic Komoidia: Father and Daughter, or Just Cousins? (2002)
- 5 Socrates in Aristophanes’ Clouds and the Audience of Attic Comedy (2007)
- 6 Aristophanes’ Clouds: An Agonistic Note (2015)
- 7 The Lesson of Book 2 (2018)
- 8 Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus (1985)
- 9 Frame and Framed in Theocritus Poems 6 and 7 (1996)
- 10 The Reception of Apollonius Rhodius in Imperial Greek Literature (2000)
- 11 Time and Place, Narrative and Speech in Philicus, Philodamus and Limenius (2015)
- 12 Greek Sophists and Greek Poetry in the Second Sophistic (1989)
- 13 Poetry and Poets in Asia and Achaea (1989)
- 14 Greek Poetry in the Antonine Age (1990)
- 15 Hadrian and Greek Poetry (2002)
- 16 Dionysius of Alexandria: A Greek Poet in the Roman Empire (2004)
- 17 Luxury Cruisers? Philip’s Epigrammatists between Greece and Rome (2012)
- 18 Doing Doric (2016)
- 19 The Novels and the Real World (1977)
- 20 The Readership of Greek Novels in the Ancient World (1994)
- 21 Philostratus: Writer of Fiction (1994)
- 22 Names and a Gem: Aspects of Allusion in the Aethiopica of Heliodorus (1995)
- 23 The Ancient Readers of the Greek Novels (1996)
- 24 Phoenician Games in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica (1998)
- 25 The Chronology of the Earlier Greek Novels since B. E. Perry: Revisions and Precisions (2002)
- 26 The Function of Mythology in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe (2003)
- 27 Metaphor in Daphnis and Chloe (2005)
- 28 The Construction of the Classical Past in the Ancient Greek Novels (2006)
- 29 Viewing and Listening on the Novelist’s Page (2006)
- 30 Direct Speech in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe (2006)
- 31 Pulling the Other? Longus on Tragedy (2007)
- 32 Links between Antonius Diogenes and Petronius (2007)
- 33 Literary Milieux (2008)
- 34 The Uses of Bookishness (2009)
- 35 Country Virtues, City Vices in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe? (2009)
- 36 Socrates’ Cock and Daphnis’ Goats: The Rarity of Vows in the Religious Practice of the Greek Novels (2012)
- 37 Caging Grasshoppers: Longus’ Materials for Weaving ‘Reality’ (2013)
- 38 ‘Milesian Tales’ (2013)
- 39 A Land without Priests? Religious Authority in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe (2015)
- 40 Poetic Elements in the Greek Novelists’ Prose (2017)
- 41 Captured Moments: Illustrating Longus’ Prose (2018)
- 42 Λέξεις Λόγγου (2019)
- 43 Animals, Slaves and Masters in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe (2019)
- 44 The Demotion of the Literary Cowherd (2019)
- 45 Callimachus and Longus (2019)
- 46 Silence in Chariton, Xenophon, Achilles Tatius and Longus (2020)
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index of Greek Terms
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 October 2023
Book contents
- Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture
- Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustration and Tables
- Places of Original Publication
- Preface
- Editions and Abbreviations
- Introduction to Volume II: Comedy, Herodotus, Hellenistic and Imperial Greek Poetry, the Novels
- 1 Who is Dicaeopolis? (1988)
- 2 Marginalia Obsceniora: Some Problems in Aristophanes’ Wasps (1990)
- 3 Wine in Old Comedy (1995)
- 4 Ionian Iambus and Attic Komoidia: Father and Daughter, or Just Cousins? (2002)
- 5 Socrates in Aristophanes’ Clouds and the Audience of Attic Comedy (2007)
- 6 Aristophanes’ Clouds: An Agonistic Note (2015)
- 7 The Lesson of Book 2 (2018)
- 8 Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus (1985)
- 9 Frame and Framed in Theocritus Poems 6 and 7 (1996)
- 10 The Reception of Apollonius Rhodius in Imperial Greek Literature (2000)
- 11 Time and Place, Narrative and Speech in Philicus, Philodamus and Limenius (2015)
- 12 Greek Sophists and Greek Poetry in the Second Sophistic (1989)
- 13 Poetry and Poets in Asia and Achaea (1989)
- 14 Greek Poetry in the Antonine Age (1990)
- 15 Hadrian and Greek Poetry (2002)
- 16 Dionysius of Alexandria: A Greek Poet in the Roman Empire (2004)
- 17 Luxury Cruisers? Philip’s Epigrammatists between Greece and Rome (2012)
- 18 Doing Doric (2016)
- 19 The Novels and the Real World (1977)
- 20 The Readership of Greek Novels in the Ancient World (1994)
- 21 Philostratus: Writer of Fiction (1994)
- 22 Names and a Gem: Aspects of Allusion in the Aethiopica of Heliodorus (1995)
- 23 The Ancient Readers of the Greek Novels (1996)
- 24 Phoenician Games in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica (1998)
- 25 The Chronology of the Earlier Greek Novels since B. E. Perry: Revisions and Precisions (2002)
- 26 The Function of Mythology in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe (2003)
- 27 Metaphor in Daphnis and Chloe (2005)
- 28 The Construction of the Classical Past in the Ancient Greek Novels (2006)
- 29 Viewing and Listening on the Novelist’s Page (2006)
- 30 Direct Speech in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe (2006)
- 31 Pulling the Other? Longus on Tragedy (2007)
- 32 Links between Antonius Diogenes and Petronius (2007)
- 33 Literary Milieux (2008)
- 34 The Uses of Bookishness (2009)
- 35 Country Virtues, City Vices in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe? (2009)
- 36 Socrates’ Cock and Daphnis’ Goats: The Rarity of Vows in the Religious Practice of the Greek Novels (2012)
- 37 Caging Grasshoppers: Longus’ Materials for Weaving ‘Reality’ (2013)
- 38 ‘Milesian Tales’ (2013)
- 39 A Land without Priests? Religious Authority in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe (2015)
- 40 Poetic Elements in the Greek Novelists’ Prose (2017)
- 41 Captured Moments: Illustrating Longus’ Prose (2018)
- 42 Λέξεις Λόγγου (2019)
- 43 Animals, Slaves and Masters in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe (2019)
- 44 The Demotion of the Literary Cowherd (2019)
- 45 Callimachus and Longus (2019)
- 46 Silence in Chariton, Xenophon, Achilles Tatius and Longus (2020)
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index of Greek Terms
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture , pp. 928 - 981Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adams, J. N., Janse, M. and Swain, S. C. R. (eds.) 2002. Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text. Oxford.Google Scholar
Aitken, E. B. and Maclean, J. K. B. (eds.) 2004. Philostratus’ Heroikos: Religion and Cultural Identity in the Third Century CE. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Alcock, S., Cherry, J. and Elsner, J. (eds.) 2001. Pausanias. Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Alperowitz, M. 1992. Das Wirken und Walten der Götter im griechischen Roman. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Alvares, J. 2001–2. ‘Some political and ideological dimensions of Chariton’s Chaireas and Callirhoe’, CJ 97: 113–44.Google Scholar
Alvares, J. and Renner, T. 2001. ‘A new fragment of the Metiochus and Parthenope romance?’, in Andorlini, I., Bastianini, G., Manfredi, M. and Menci, G. (eds.), Atti del XXII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia. Florence: i 35–40.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1976a. Lucian. Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic. Mnemosyne Suppl. 41. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. and Nisbet, R. G. M. 1979. ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm’, JRS 69: 125–55.Google Scholar
Aneziri, S. 2003. Die Vereine der dionysischen Techniten im Kontext der hellenistischen Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte, Organisation und Wirkung der hellenistischen Technitenvereine. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Arena, G. and Cassia, M. 2015. Marcello di Side: Gli imperatori adottivi e il potere della medicina. Roma.Google Scholar
Argentieri, L. 2007. ‘Meleager and Philip as epigram collectors’, in Bing, and Bruss, (eds.): 147–64.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1979. ‘The Mound of Brasilas in Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll’, QUCC n.s. 3: 99–106.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 2002. ‘Some orthographical variants in the papyri of later Greek comedy’, in Willi (ed.): 191–217.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2011. ‘Song, politics and cultural memory: Pindar’s Pythian 7 and the Alcmeonid temple of Apollo’, in Athanassaki, and Bowie, (eds.): 235–68.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2013. ‘Rekindling the memory of the alleged treason of the Alcmaeonids at Marathon: from Megacles to Alcibiades’, in Buraselis, Κ and Koulakiotis, E. (eds.), Marathon: The Day After. Athens: 95–111.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2018. ‘The cult of peace in the Athenian theatre during the Peloponnesian War: from Euripides’ Cresphontes to Aristophanes’ Peace and beyond’, ICS 43: 1–24.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. L. (eds.) 2011. Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin.Google Scholar
Avaert, P. 1948. Éléments de réalité chez Xénophon d’Ephèse. Thèse pour la licence, Louvain.Google Scholar
Aymard, J. 1951. Essai sur les chasses romaines, des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins (Cynegetica). Paris.Google Scholar
Bady, C. 2021. La Rome des pepaideumenoi: mobilité, patronage et sociabilité des élites intellectuelles hellénophones dans la Rome du Haut-Empire (31 av. J.-C.–235 ap. J.-C.). DPhil thesis, Université Paris Nanterre.Google Scholar
Bär, S. 2009. Quintus Smyrnaeus, Posthomerica 1: die Wiedergeburt des Epos aus dem Geiste der Amazonomachie: mit einem Kommentar zu den Versen 1–219. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Baillet, J. 1920–6. Inscriptions grecques et latines des tombeaux des rois ou Syringes à Thèbes. Cairo.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.) 2012. Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, G. 1989. Daphnis and Chloe: The Markets and Metamorphoses of an Unknown Bestseller. London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1996. ‘Poetry, praise, and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s “Odes”’, CA 15: 5–47.Google Scholar
Barker, A. D. 2002. Euterpe: ricerche sulla musica greca e romana, eds. Perusino, F. and Rocconi., E. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bartley, A. N. 2003. Stories from the Mountains, Stories from the Sea: The Digressions and Similes of Oppian’s Halieutica and the Cynegetica. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F. 1992a. ‘La famille de Philopappos de Commagène, un prince entre deux mondes’, DHA 18: 89–101.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F. 1992b. ‘De l’histoire au roman: la Perse de Chariton’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 199–212.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F., Hoffmann, P. and Trédé, M. (eds.) 1992. Le monde du roman grec. Études de littérature ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. 2010. ‘PSI XIII 1305, Romanzo di Nino’, in Bastianini, and Casanova, : 279–88.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.) 2010. I papiri del romanzo antico. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 11–12 giugno 2009. Firenze.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. 2011. Bilder Schreiben: Virtuose Ekphrasis in Philostrats “Eikones”. Berlin.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M., Bär, S. and Dümmler, N. (eds.) 2007. Quintus Smyrnaeus: Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bean, G. E. 1965. The Inscriptions of Side. Türk tarıh kurumu yayınlarından 5.20. Ankara.Google Scholar
Bean, G. E. and Mitford, T. B. 1970. Journeys in Rough Cilicia 1964–1968. Denkschriften der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 102. Ergänzungsbände zu den Tituli Asiae Minoris 3. Wien.Google Scholar
Béguin, S. 1971. ‘Quelques nouveaux dessins d’Ambroise Dubois’, Revue de l’art 14: 31–8.Google Scholar
Behr, C. A. 1981. P. Aelius Aristides. The Complete Works. Volume II. Orations xvii–liii (transl. into English). Leiden.Google Scholar
Bejarano, V. 1975. ‘El emperador Adriano ante la tradición romana’, Pyrenae 11: 81–98.Google Scholar
Bekker-Nielsen, T. 2008. Urban Life and Local Politics in Roman Bithynia. Aarhus and Oakville, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélis, A. 1988. ‘A proposito degli “inni delfici” ad Apollo’, in Gentili, B. and Pretagostini, R. (eds.), La musica in Grecia. Bari: 205–18.Google Scholar
Bélis, A. 2001. ‘Esthétique musicale du péan à travers l’exemple des Hymnes delphiques à Apollon’, in Brulé, P. et Vendries, C. (eds.), Chanter les dieux: musique et religion dans l’antiquité grecque et romaine. Actes du colloque des 16, 17 et 18 décembre 1999, Rennes et Lorient). Rennes: 97–114.Google Scholar
Beltran Fortes, J. 1992. ‘Arriano de Nicomedia y la Bética, de nuevo’, Habis 23: 171–96.Google Scholar
Benjamin, A. S. 1963. ‘The altars of Hadrian in Athens and Hadrian’s Panhellenic program’, Hesperia 32: 57–86.Google Scholar
Benner, A. R. and Fobes, F. H. 1949. The Letters of Alciphron, Aelian and Philostratus. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Bergquist, B. 1990. ‘Sympotic space: a functional aspect of Greek dining-rooms’, in Murray, (ed.): 38–65.Google Scholar
Bernhardy, G. 1847. De scriptoribus historiae Augustae: prooemia duo scholis Universitatis Fridericianae indicendis. Halle.Google Scholar
Bernsdorff, H. 2006. ‘Zur Handlung von P.Oxy. 4761 (Antonios Diogenes?)’, GFA 9: 7–12.Google Scholar
Bernsdorff, H. 2009. ‘Antonios-Diogenes-Interpretationen’, in Studien zur Philologie und zur Musikwissenschaft. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Philologisch-Historische Klasse. Berlin: 1–52.Google Scholar
Beschorner, A. 1999. Helden und Heroen, Homer und Caracalla: Übersetzung, Kommentar und Interpretationen zum Heroikos des Flavios Philostratos. Bari.Google Scholar
Bianchi, N. 2016. ‘The number of books of Iamblichus’ Babyloniaca (On Photius Bibl. 94, 78b3)’, Prometheus 42: 219–25.Google Scholar
Bidez, J. 1960. L’Empereur Julien. Œuvres complètes. i 2. Lettres et fragments. 2me éd. Paris.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. and Lardinois, A. (eds.) 2016. The Newest Sappho. P. Sapph. Obbink and P. GC inv. 105, Frs. 1–4. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 1996. ‘Characterization in the ancient novel’, in Schmeling, (ed.): 115–29.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (ed.) 2001. ὈΠΩΡΑ: la belle saison de l’hellénisme: études de littérature antique offertes au Recteur Jacques Bompaire. Paris.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 2019. ‘Histoire, mythologie, rhétorique et récit dans le roman de Chariton’, in Chew, , Morgan, and Trzaskoma, (eds.): 51–64.Google Scholar
Biraud, M. and Briand, M. (eds.) 2017. Roman grec et poésie. Dialogue des genres et nouveaux enjeux du poétique. CMO 56. Lyon.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) 2001. The New Simonides. Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. 1979. Recherches sur le dieu Pan. Roma (transl. by K. Atlass and J. Redfield as The Cult of Pan in Ancient Greece, Chicago and London 1988).Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. 1971. ‘Emendations and interpretations in the Greek Anthology’, CQ 21: 426–36.Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. 1972. ‘Nicetes the rhetorician and Vergil’s “plena deo”’, Mnemosyne 25: 408–12.Google Scholar
Boter, G. 2015. ‘The title of Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius of Tyana’, JHS 135: 1–7.Google Scholar
Bouchon, R., Brillet-Dubois, P. and Le Meur Weissman, N. (eds.) 2012. Hymnes de la Grèce Antique. Approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19–21 juin 2008. Lyon.Google Scholar
Bougot, A. and Lissarrague, F. 1991. Philostrate, La Galerie de Tableaux, traduit par A. Bougot; révisé et annoté par F. Lissarrague; préface de P. Hadot. Paris.Google Scholar
Boulanger, A. 1923. Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d’Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère. Paris.Google Scholar
Bouquiaux-Simone, O. 1968. Les lectures Homériques de Lucien. Académie royale de Belgique, Classe des lettres. Mémoires, 2nd ser. 59.2. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1985. ‘Poetry’, in Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. i. Cambridge: 659–64 (pb. i 4, 1989: 89–94).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1970. ‘Greeks and their past in the second sophistic’, P&P 46: 3–41 (repr. in M. I. Finley (ed.), Studies in Ancient Society. London: 166–209).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1977. ‘The novels and the real world’, summary of a paper delivered to the International Conference on the Ancient Novel, in Reardon, B. P. (ed.), Erotica Antiqua. Bangor: 91–6.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1978. ‘Apollonius of Tyana: tradition and reality’, in Temporini, H. and Haase, W. (eds.), ANRW ii.16.2. Berlin and New York: 1652–99.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1985b. ‘The Greek novel’, in Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. i Part 4. Cambridge: 669–99, 703–9 (pb. 1989: 123–39, 243–52).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1986a. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35 (repr. in Rutherford [ed.] 2019: 110–49).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1989a. ‘Greek sophists and Greek poetry in the Second Sophistic’, in ANRW ii 33.1: 209–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1989b. ‘Greek poetry in Asia and Achaea’, in Walker, S. and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Greek Renaissance in the Roman empire, Papers from the Tenth British Museum Classical Colloquium (December 1986), BICS Suppl. 55: 198–205.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1990b. ‘Greek poetry in the Antonine Age’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford: 53–90.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1990c. ‘Marginalia Obsceniora: some problems in Aristophanes’ Wasps’, in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens. Essays on Classical Subjects for Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford: 31–8.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1992. ‘Les lecteurs du roman grec’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 55–61.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1993a. ‘Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter: 1–37.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1994a. ‘The readership of Greek novels in the ancient world’, in Tatum, J. (ed.), The Search for the Ancient Novel. Baltimore and London: 435–59.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1994b. ‘Philostratus: writer of fiction’, in Stoneman, R. and Morgan, J. R. (eds.), Greek Fiction. London: 181–99.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1995b. ‘Names and a gem: aspects of allusion in the Aethiopica of Heliodorus’, in Innes, D. C., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric. Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford: 269–80.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1996a. ‘Frame and framed in Theocritus poems 6 and 7’, Hellenistica Groningana 2: 91–100.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1996b. ‘Aristides (2)’, in The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. Oxford: 160.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1996c. ‘The ancient readers of the Greek novels’, in Schmeling, (ed.): 87–106.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1997c. ‘Hadrian, Favorinus, and Plutarch’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World. London: 1–15.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1998a. ‘Le portrait de Socrate dans les Nuées d’Aristophane’, in Trédé, M. and Hoffmann, P. (eds.), Le rire des anciens. Paris: 53–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1998b. ‘Phoenician games in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, in Hunter, (ed.): 1–18.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2000a. ‘The reception of Apollonius Rhodius in imperial Greek literature’, Hellenistica Groningana 4: 1–10.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001a. ‘Ancestors of historiography in early Greek elegiac and iambic poetry’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 45–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001c. ‘Pausanias: inspiration and aspiration’, in Alcock, Cherry and Elsner, (eds.): 21–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002a. ‘The chronology of the earlier Greek novels since B. E. Perry: revisions and precisions’, AN 2: 47–63.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002c. ‘Ionian iambus and Old Attic Comedy’, in Willi, A. (ed.), The Language of Old Comedy. Oxford: 33–50.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002d. ‘Plutarch and literary activity in Achaea: AD 107–117’, in Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 AD). Leuven: 41–56.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002e. ‘Hadrian and Greek poetry’, in Ostenfeld, E., Blomqvist, K. and Nevett, L. C. (eds.), Greek Romans, Roman Greeks. Aarhus: 172–97.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2003b. ‘The function of mythology in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, in López Férez, J.-A. (ed.), Mitos en la literatura griega helenística e imperial. Madrid: 361–76.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004a. ‘Denys d’Alexandrie: un poète grec dans l’empire romain’, REA 106: 177–85.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004b. ‘Poetry and music in the Life of Plutarch’s Statesman’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works, Vol. 1. Mnemosyne Suppl. 250. Leiden: 115–23.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004c. ‘The geography of the Second Sophistic: cultural variations’, in Borg, (ed.): 65–83.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2005a. ‘Les animaux dans le Daphnis and Chloé de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. (ed.), Lieux, décors et paysages de l’ancien roman des origines à Byzance. Lyon: 75–85.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2005b. ‘Metaphor in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe’, in Harrison, S. J., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel. ANS 4. Groningen: 68–86.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006a. ‘The construction of the classical past in the ancient Greek novels’, in Eklund, S. (ed.), Συγχάρματα: Studies in Honour of Jan Fredrik Kindstrand, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Graeca Upsaliensia 21. Uppsala: 1–20.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006b. ‘Le discours direct dans le Daphnis et Chloé de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. and Peigney, J. (eds.), Discours et débats dans l’ancien roman. Lyon: 27–39.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006c. ‘Choral performances’, in Konstan, D. and Saïd, S. (eds.), Greeks on Greekness. Supplement to the Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. Cambridge: 61–92.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006d. ‘Viewing and listening on the novelist’s page’, in Byrne, S. N., Cueva, E. P. and Alvares, J. (eds.), Authors, Authority and Interpreters in the Ancient Novel. Essays in Honor of Gareth L. Schmeling. ANS 5. Groningen: 60–82.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007a. ‘Early expatriates: displacement and exile in archaic poetry’, in Gaertner, J.-F. (ed.), Writing Exile. The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden: 21–49.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007c. ‘Pulling the other: Longus on tragedy’, in Elsner, J., Foley, H. P., Goldhill, S. and Kraus, C. (eds.), Visualizing the Tragic: Drama Myth and Ritual in Greek Art and Literature. Oxford and New York: 338–52.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007d. ‘Links between Antonius Diogenes and Petronius’, in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and the Roman Novel: Parallel Readings. ANS 8. Groningen: 121–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007e. ‘The ups and downs of Aristophanic travel’, in Hall, E. and Wrigley, A. (eds.), Aristophanes in Performance. Oxford: 32–51.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007f. ‘Socrates in Aristophanes’ Clouds and the Audience of Attic Comedy’, lecture at the European Cultural Centre of Delphi.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008a. ‘Aristides and early Greek lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry’, in Harris, W. V. and Holmes, B. (eds.), Aelius Aristides between Greece, Rome and the Gods. CSCT 33. Leiden and Boston: 9–29.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008c. ‘Plutarch’s habits of citation: aspects of difference’, in Nikolaidis, A. (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch’s Work: ‘Moralia’ Themes in the ‘Lives’, Features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’. Berlin and New York: 143–57.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009a. ‘Wandering poets, archaic style’, in Hunter, R. L. and Rutherford, I. C. (eds.), Wandering Poets. Cambridge: 105–36.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009b. ‘Vertus de la campagne, vices de la cité dans Daphnis et Chloé de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. and Bost-Pouderon, C. (eds.), Passions, vertus, vices dans l’ancien roman. Lyon: 13–22.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009c. ‘The uses of bookishness’, in Paschalis, M., Panyotakis, S. and Schmeling, G. (eds.), Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel. ANS 12. Groningen: 115–26.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009d. ‘Quotation of earlier texts in τὰ ἐς τὸν Τυανέα Ἀπολλώνιον’, in Demoen, K. and Pratt, D. (eds.), Theios Sophistes. Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ ‘Vita Apollonii’. Mnemosyne Suppl. 305. Leiden and Boston: 57–73.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010b. ‘Historical narrative in archaic and early classical Greek elegy’, in Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.), Epic and History. Malden, MA and Oxford: 145–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010c. ‘Stobaeus and Early Greek Melic, Elegiac and Iambic Poetry’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds.), Condensing Texts – Condensed Texts. Stuttgart: 587–617.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010d. ‘Marathon in fifth-century epigram’, in Buraselis, K. and Meidani, K. (eds.), Marathon: The Ancient Deme and the Battle. Athens: 203–19.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2011b. ‘Men from Mytilene’, in Schmitz, T. and Wiater, N. (eds.), The Struggle for Identity. Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart: 49–63.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012a. ‘An early chapter in the history of the Theognidea’, in Riu, X. and Pòrtulas, J. (eds.), Approaches to Archaic Greek Poetry. Orione 5. Messina: 121–48.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012c. ‘Stesichorus and Ibycus: plain tales from the western front’, in Marincola, J., Llewelyn-Jones, L. and Maciver, C. (eds.), Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras: History without Historians. Edinburgh Leventis Studies 6. Edinburgh: 83–94.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012d. ‘Epinicians and “patrons”’, in Agocs, P., Carey, C. and Rawles, R. (eds.), Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge: 83–92.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012e. ‘Luxury cruisers? Philip’s epigrammatists between Greece and Rome’, Aevum Antiquum 8: 223–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012f. ‘Socrates’ cock and Daphnis’ goats. The rarity of vows in the religious practice of the Greek novels’, Trends in Classics 4.2: 225–73.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012g. ‘Hadrien et Smyrne’, in Hostein, A. and Lalanne, S. (eds.), Les voyages des empereurs dans l’orient romain. Époques Antonine et Sévérienne. Paris: 247–61.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012h. ‘Hadrien et Éphèse’, in Hostein, A. and Lalanne, S. (eds.), Les voyages des empereurs dans l’orient romain. Époques Antonine et Sévérienne. Paris: 263–96.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2013c. ‘Milesian tales’, in Whitmarsh, T. and Thomson, S. (eds.), The Romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge: 243–57.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2013d. ‘Caging grasshoppers: Longus’ materials for plaiting “reality”’, in Paschalis, , Panyotakis, and Schmeling, (eds.): 179–97.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2013e. ‘Libraries for the Caesars’, in Koenig, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: 237–60.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014a. ‘Rediscovering Sacadas’, in Moreno, A. and Thomas, R. (eds.), Patterns of the Past: Epitēdeumata in the Greek Tradition. Oxford: 39–55.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014c. ‘Becoming wolf, staying sheep’, in Rees, R. and Madsen, J. (eds.), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing. Leiden and Boston: 39–78.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014d. ‘Greek culture in Arrian’s Bithynia’, in Lalanne, S. and Hostein, A. (eds.), Le monde d’Arrien de Nicomédie. Ktèma 39: 37–49.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015b. ‘Aristophanes Clouds: an agonistic note’, in Fernández, C., Nápoli, J. and Zecchin, G. (eds.), ΑΓΩΝ: Competencia y cooperación de la antigua Grecia a la actualidad. Homenaje a Ana María González de Tobia. La Plata: 95–109.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015c. ‘Land without priests? Religious Authority in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe ’, in Panayotakis, Schmeling and Paschalis, : 67–84.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015d. ‘Time and place, narrative and speech in Philicus, Philodamus and Limenius’, in Faulkner, A. and Hodkinson, O. (eds.), Hymnic Narrative and the Narratology of Greek Hymns. Leiden and Boston: 87–118.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016a. ‘Cultic contexts for elegiac performance’, in Swift, L. and Carey, C. (eds.), Iambus and Elegy. New Approaches. Oxford: 15–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016b. ‘Quo usque tandem? How long were sympotic songs?’, in Cazzato, V., Obbink, D. and Prodi, E. E. (eds.), The Cup of Song: Studies on Poetry and the Symposium. Oxford: 28–41.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016f. ‘Doing Doric’, in Sistakou, E. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Dialect, Diction, and Style in Greek Literary and Inscribed Epigram. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 43. Berlin and New York: 3–22.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016g. ‘Xenophon’s influence in imperial Greece’, in Flower, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon. Cambridge: 403–14.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016i. ‘Literary criticism of archaic lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry in Dio of Prusa’, in E. Amato, C. Bost-Pouderon, T. Grandjean, L. Thévenet, and G. Ventrella (eds.), ‘Dion de Pruse: l’homme, son œuvre et sa postérité’ (Actes du colloque Nantes, 21–23 mai 2015). Spoudasmata 169. Hildesheim 2016, 365–72.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2017a. ‘Poetic elements in the vocabulary of the Greek novelists’, in Biraud, M. and Briand, M. (eds.), Roman grec et poésie. Dialogue des genres et nouveaux enjeux du poétique. CMO 56. Lyon: 97–133.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2017c. ‘The view from Aphrodisias and Hadrianoutherae’, in Niehoff, M. R. (ed.), Journeys in the Roman East: Imagined and Real. Tübingen: 23–51.Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. 2018c. ‘Captured moments: illustrating Longus’ prose’, in Thorsen, T. S. and Harrison, S. J. (eds.), The Dynamics of Ancient Prose. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 62. Berlin and New York: 195–222.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (ed.) 2018d. Herodotus. Narrator Scientist Historian. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019b. ‘Animals, slaves and masters in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe ’, in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S. and Panayotakis, C. (eds.), Masters and Slaves. ANS 23: 107–25.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019d. ‘Marcus Aurelius, Greek poets, and Greek sophists: friends or foes?’, in Bosman, P. R. (ed.), Intellectual and Empire in Greco-Roman Antiquity. London: 142–59.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019e. ‘The marginalisation of women in Philostratus’ Lives of the sophists ’, in Lalanne, S. (ed.), Femmes grecques de l’Orient romain, DHA Suppl. 18: 207–19.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019f. ‘Poetic and prose oral performance in the Greek world of the Roman Empire’, in Ruiz Montero, C. (ed.), Aspects of Orality and Greek Literature in the Roman Empire. Newcastle: 50–81.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019h. ‘The demotion of the literary cowherd’, in Bastick, J., Cusset, C. and Vieilleville, C. (eds.), Aitia 9.1. Le bouvier dans la poésie hellénistique et le roman grec. Lyon: no pagination.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019i. ‘Callimachus and Longus’, in Klooster, J., Cuyper, M., Regtuit, R. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus Revisited. New Perspectives in Callimachean Scholarship. Hellenistica Groningana 24. Groningen: 51–64.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2020b. ‘Silence in Chariton, Xenophon, Achilles Tatius and Longus’, in Papadodima, E. (ed.), Faces of Silence in Ancient Greek Literature. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 100. Berlin and Boston: 51–72.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2021a. ‘Sappho in imperial Greek literature’, in Finglass, P. and Kelly, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Sappho. Cambridge: 313–29.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2021b. ‘Theocritus and Longus’, in Sistakou, E., Kyriakou, P. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Theocritus. Leiden and Boston: 747–68.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022a. ‘Theatre and autocracy in the Greek world of the High Roman Empire’, in Csapo, E., Green, J. R., Le Guen, B., Paillard, E., Stoop, J. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Theatre and Autocracy in the Ancient World. Berlin and Boston: 163–79.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022b. ‘Singing Rome’, in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N. and Thévenaz, O. (eds.), Performance et mimesis: variations sur la lyrique cultuelle de la Grèce archaïque au Haut Empire romain. Actes du colloque international organisé les 5–7 novembre 2015 par l’ENS de Lyon, HiSoMA (UMR 5189) et l’Université de Lausanne, Supplément de Kernos. Liège: 147–60.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022c. ‘Greek culture in Hellenistic and early imperial Bithynia’, Mnemosyne 75: 73–112.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022d. ‘Tradition and authority in Philostratus’ Lives of the sophists’, in Scarlett Kingsley, K., Monti, G. and Rood, T. (eds.), The Authoritative Historian: Tradition and Innovation in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: 292–312.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022e. ‘Greek Grammatici in the Roman Empire’, in A.-M. Favreau-Linder, S. Lalanne, J.-L. Vix (eds.), Passeurs de culture. Recherches sur les Rhétoriques Religieuses 32. Turnhout: 17–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. forthcoming. ‘Philicus’ Demeter: not a hymn?’, in Cartlidge, B., Kwapisz, J. and Perale, M. (eds.), Hellenistic Poetry before Callimachus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 1997. Pannychis e simposio: feste private notturne di donne e uomini nei testi letterari e nel culto. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bréchet, C., Videau, A. and Webb, R. (eds.) 2013. Théories et pratiques de la fiction à l’époque impériale. Paris.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1975. ‘The meadow of love and two passages in Euripides’ Hippolytus’, Mnemosyne 28: 268–80.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1996. ‘A purposeful manipulation of myth: Philodamus’ paian to Dionysus’, in Aristodemo, D., Maeder, C. and de Rooy, R. (eds.), Studi di Teoria e Storia letteraria, in onore di Pieter de Meijer. Firenze: 81–92.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M., van Erp Taalman Kip, A. M. and Slings, S. R. 1987. Some Recently Found Greek Poems. Mnemosyne Suppl. 99. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. and Handley, E. W. (eds.) 1993. Aristophane: Sept exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens Hardt 38. Vandœuvres–Genève.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1998. ‘The novel and the Apocryphal Acts: place, time and readership’, in Hofmann, H. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel IX. Groningen: 157–80.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2012. ‘Athenian civic priests from classical times to late antiquity: some considerations’, in Horster, M. and Klöckner, A. (eds.), Civic Priests. Cult Personnel in Athens from the Hellenistic Period to Late Antiquity: Berlin and New York: 219–35.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2013. ‘The representation of priests and priestesses in the pagan and Christian Greek novel’, in Dignas, B., Parker, R. and Stroumsa, G. (eds.), Priests and Prophets among Pagans, Jews and Christians. Leuven: 136–61.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.) 1991. A Cultural History of Gesture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. 1998. ‘The poets Julia Balbilla and Damo at the Colossus of Memnon’, CW 91: 215–34.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 1994. Dionysius von Alexandria, Das Lied von der Welt. Zweisprachige Ausgabe. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. 1990. ‘Honouring the goddess: Philicus’ Hymn to Demeter’, Aegyptus 70: 173–89.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. 1970. Anthologie grecque: Anthologie palatine, XII, livres XIII–XV. Paris.Google Scholar
Bühler, W. 1978. ‘Ein unbekanntes, Kaiser Hadrian zugeschriebenes Epigramm (Mitteilungen aus griechischen Handschriften, 6)’, ZPE 31: 55–60.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. C. 1902. Epideictic Literature. Chicago Studies in Classical Philology. Chicago.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA (transl. by E. L. Minar of Weisheit und Wissenschaft. Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon. Nürnberg 1962).Google Scholar
Burton, J. B. 2012. ‘From Theocritean to Longan bucolic: Eugenianus’ Drosilla and Charicles’, GRBS 52: 684–713.Google Scholar
Byrne, S. 2003. Roman Citizens of Athens. Studia Hellenistica 40. Leuven and Dudley, MA.Google Scholar
Cabanes, P. 1976. L’Épire de la mort de Pyrrhos à la conquête romaine, 272–167 av. J.C. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2009. ‘Apollo in Delphi and in Delos: poetic performances between paean and dithyramb’, in Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P. and Miller, J. (eds.), Apolline Politics and Poetics. Athens: 169–97.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. III 1970. ‘Aristophanes Vespae 68–69. An unnoticed obscenity’, CPh 65: 257.Google Scholar
Calza, G., Becatti, G., Gismondi, I., De Angelis D’Ossat, G. and Bloch, H. 1953. Scavi di Ostia i. Topografia Generale. Roma.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1980d. ‘Crinagoras and the elder Julia. A.P. 6.345 = GP 6’, LCM 5: 129–30.Google Scholar
Cantarelli, L. 1898. ‘Gli scritti latini di Adriano imperatore’, Studi e documenti di storia e diritto 19: 113–70.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. P. C. 2009. Καὶ ὄναρ καὶ ὕπαρ: Dreaming in the Ancient Novel. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. 1981. ‘Attico “volgare” e ioni in Atene alla fine del 5 secolo a.c.’, AION (filol.) 3: 79–93.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. 1996. ‘Veicoli materiali della letteratura di consumo: maniere di scrivere e maniere di leggere’, in Pecere, and Stramaglia, (eds.): 11–46 (repr. in Cavallo 2005: 213–33).Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. 2005. Il calamo e il papiro: la scrittura greca dall’età ellenistica ai primi secoli di Bisanzio. Firenze.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1968–80. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. 4 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Chaumont, M.-L. 1992. ‘Échos de la campagne de Tibère en Arménie (20 av. J.–C.) dans une épigramme de Krinagoras (Anthologia Palatina IX, 430)’, AC 61: 178–91.Google Scholar
Chew, K., Morgan, J. R. and Trzaskoma, S. (eds.) 2019. Literary Currents and Romantic Forms. Essays in Memory of Bryan Reardon. ANS 26. Groningen.Google Scholar
Christesen, P. 2007. Olympic Victor Lists and Ancient Greek History. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, J. 1984. ‘Dédale géographe: Regard et voyages aériens en Grèce’, LALIES 3: 147–64.Google Scholar
Chuvin, P. 1991. Chronique des derniers païens: la disparition du paganisme dans l’Empire romain, du règne de Constantin à celui de Justinien (2e édition revue et corrigée). Paris.Google Scholar
Cioffi, R. L. 2013. ‘Seeing Gods: epiphany and narrative in the Greek novels’, AN 11: 1–42.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. J. 1999. Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1972. ‘A verse inscription from Eleusis concerning Herodes Atticus’, Ἀρχ. Ἐφημ: 182–3 with pl. 72.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1974. ‘The sacred officials of the Eleusinian mysteries’, Trans. Am. Philosophical Soc. 64.3: 1–143.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1999. ‘Eleusis from Augustus to the Antonines: progress and problems’, in Atti XI Congresso Internazionale di Epigrafia Greca e Latina. Roma: ii 93–102.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 1981. ‘Could Greek women read and write?’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: 219–45.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 2011. ‘Sailing to Nuceria: evidence for the date of Xenophon of Ephesus’, AClass 54: 27–42.Google Scholar
Conca, F., De Carli, E. and Zanetto, G. 1963–97. Lessico dei Romanzieri Greci (Vol. i Milano 1963, Vols. ii–iv Hildesheim, Zürich and New York 1989–97).Google Scholar
Connelly, J. B. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2002. ‘Chariton’s Syracuse and the histories of empire’, in Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Space in the Ancient Novel. ANS 1. Groningen: 12–26.Google Scholar
Corrêa, P. da Cunha 2010. Um Bestiário Arcaico. Fábulas e imagens de animais na poesía de Arquíloco. Campinas.Google Scholar
Cresci, L. R. 1981. ‘Il romanzo di Longo sofista e la tradizione bucolica’, A&R 26: 1–25 (repr. as ‘The novel of Longus the sophist and the pastoral tradition’, in Swain, (ed.) 1999: 210–42).Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2001a. ‘The grammarian’s choice: the popularity of Euripides’ Phoenissae in Hellenistic and Roman education’, in Too, (ed.): 241–59.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2001b. Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.Google Scholar
Crismani, D. 1994. Il teatro nel romanzo ellenistico d’amore e di avventure. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. 1902. Coptic Ostraka from the Collections of the Egypt Exploration Fund, the Cairo Museum and Others. London.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2007. ‘The men who built the theatres: Theatropolitai, Theatronai and Arkhitektones’, in Wilson, (ed.): 85–105.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 1996. ‘Plutarch’s Ariadne in Chariton’s Chaereas and Callirhoe’, AJPh 117: 473–84.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 2000. ‘The date of Chariton’s Chaereas and Callirhoe revisited’, C&M 51: 197–208.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 2004. The Myths of Fiction: Studies in the Canonical Greek Novels. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. and Byrne, S. N. (eds.) 2014. A Companion to the Ancient Novel. Oxford and Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Currie, B. and Rutherford, I. C. (eds.) 2019. The Reception of Greek Lyric Poetry in the Ancient World: Transmission, Canonization and Paratext. Studies in Archaic and Classical Greek Song 5, Mnemosyne Suppl. 430. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Curty, O. 1995. Les parentés légendaires entre cités grecques: catalogue raisonné des inscriptions contenant le terme ΣΥΓΓΕΝΕΙΑ et analyse critique. Genève.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 2006. ‘Discours divins et débats intérieurs dans les Pastorales de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. and Peigney, J. (eds.), Discours et débats dans l’ancien roman. CMO 36. Lyon: 231–48.Google Scholar
Danek, G. and Wallisch, R. 1993. ‘Notizen zu Longus Daphnis und Chloe’, WS 106: 45–60.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Pomeroy, S. B. 2012. ‘Marcellus of Side’s epitaph on Regilla (IG XIV 1389): an historical and literary commentary’, Prometheus 38: 3–34.Google Scholar
Dawson, S. 1997. ‘The theatrical audience in fifth-century Athens: numbers and status’, Prudentia 29: 1–14.Google Scholar
De Bakker, M. 2021. ‘Herodotus’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 197–222.Google Scholar
Degani, E. 1993. ‘Aristofane e la tradizione dell’ invettiva personale in Grecia’, in Bremer, and Handley, (eds.): 1–36.Google Scholar
Del Corso, L. 2010. ‘Il romanzo greco a Ossirinco e i suoi lettori. Osservazioni paleografiche, bibliogiche, storio-culturali’, in Bastianini, and Casanova, (eds.): 247–77.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2014. Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2021a. ‘Chariton’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 635–53.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2021b. ‘Achilles Tatius’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 673–91.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. 1988. ‘The date of the Cyzicene epigrams. An analysis of the vocabulary and metrical technique of AP, III’, AC 57: 231–48.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. 1998. ‘Poets as Initiates in the Mysteries. Euphorion, Philicus and Posidippus’, Antike und Abendland 44: 49–77.Google Scholar
Di Maria, G. 1996. Achillis quae feruntur Astronomica et in Aratum Opuscula: De Universo; De Arati Vita; De Phaenomenorum Interpretatione. Palermo.Google Scholar
Di Marzio, M. 2019. ‘L’Epigramma 31 Bernand di Giulia Balbilla e l’acrostico con la voce di Phamenoth/Memnone’, QUCC 123: 105–30.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 1994. ‘Archaic Greek foundation poetry: questions of genre and occasion’, JHS 114: 35–46.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1964. ‘The poetry of Archilochos’, in Archiloque. Entretiens Hardt 10. Vandœuvres-Genève: 181–222 (repr. in Dover 1988: 97–121).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1968. Aristophanes Clouds. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1976. ‘The freedom of the intellectual in Greek society’, Talanta 7: 24–74 (repr. in Dover 1988: 135–58).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1988. The Greeks and Their Legacy. Collected Papers II: Prose Literature, History, Society, Transmission, Influence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1993a. Aristophanes Frogs. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1993b. ‘The chorus of initiates in Aristophanes’ Frogs ’, in Bremer, and Handley, (eds.): 173–93.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J., West, M. L., Griffin, J. and Bowie, E. L. 1980. Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2006. ‘Pouvoir divin, discours humain chez Héliodore’, in Pouderon, B. and Peigney, J. (eds.), Discours et débats dans l’ancien roman. CMO 36. Lyon: 249–61.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2007. ‘A lengthy sentence: judging the prolixity of the Greek novels’, in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and Roman Novel. Parallel Readings. ANS 8. Groningen: 133–50.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2010. ‘The gods in the Greek novel’, in Bremmer, J., Erskine, A. and Auffarth, C. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations. Edinburgh: 362–74.Google Scholar
Downie, J. 2013. At the Limits of Art: A Literary Study of Aelius Aristides’ Hieroi logoi. Oxford.Google Scholar
Downie, J. 2017. ‘The geography of empire in Dionysius’ Periegesis: a view from the Aegean’, CW 110: 163–86.Google Scholar
Drago, A. and Hodkinson, O. 2023. Ancient Love Letters: Form, Themes, Approaches. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dubel, S. 1990. ‘La description d’objets d’art dans les Éthiopiques’, Pallas 36: 101–15.Google Scholar
Dueck, D., Lindsay, H. and Pothecary, S. (eds.) 2006. Strabo’s Cultural Geography. The Making of a Kolossourgia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 1977. ‘Age-rounding, illiteracy, and social differentiation in the Roman Empire’, Chiron 7: 333–53.Google Scholar
DuQuesnay, I. M. LeM. 1981. ‘Vergil’s First Eclogue’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3. Liverpool: 29–182.Google Scholar
Dümmler, N. N. 2012. ‘Musaeus, Hero and Leander: between epic and novel’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and Its Reception. Leiden: 411–46.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 1986. Michael Psellus. The Essays on Euripides and George of Pisidia and on Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius. Byz. Vindobon. 16. Wien.Google Scholar
Eck, W. 1983. ‘Jahres- und Provinzialfasten der senatorischen Statthalter von 69/70 bis 138–139. 2 Teil’, Chiron 13: 147–237.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 1985. ‘Aristophanes’ Socrates’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Volume I. Lanham: 209–30.Google Scholar
Effe, B. 1977. Dichtung und Lehre. Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Zetemata 69. München.Google Scholar
Effe, B. 1982. ‘Longos. Zur Funktionsgeschichte der Bukolik in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, Hermes 110: 65–84 (repr. as ‘Longus: towards a history of bucolic and its function in the Roman Empire’, in Swain (ed.) 1999: 189–209).Google Scholar
Egger, B. 1988. ‘Zu den Frauenrollen im griechischen Roman: Die Frau als Heldin and Leserin’, GCN 1: 33–66.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2000. ‘From the culture of spolia to the cult of relics: the Arch of Constantine and the genesis of late antique forms’, PBSR 68: 149–84.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Squire, M. forthcoming. The Art of Looking in the Roman World: Painting and Description in the Imagines of the Elder Philostratus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Étienne, R. and Piérart, M. 1975. ‘Un décret du Koinon des Hellènes à Platées en l’honneur de Glaucon, fils d’Étéoclès d’Athènes’, BCH 99: 51–75.Google Scholar
Fajen, F. 1999, Oppianus Halieutica. Einführung, Text, Übersetzung in deutscher Sprache, Auführliche Kataloge der Meeresfauna. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2007. ‘Mescolare il ludicro al serio: la poetica del Corcirese Filico e l’edonismo dei Feaci (SH 980)’, in Lozza, G. and Tempesta, S. M. (eds.), L’epigramma Greco: problemi e prospettive: atti del Congresso della Consulta Universitaria del Greco, Milano, 21 ottobre 2005. Milano: 53–68.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. 1971. Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot: Studien zur Erzählkunst Herodots. Berlin and New York (transl. by J. G. Howie as Herodotus and His ‘Sources’: Citation, Invention, and Narrative Art. Leeds 1989).Google Scholar
Fein, S. 1994. Die Beziehungen der Kaiser Trajan und Hadrian zu den Litterati. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Fernandez, C. and Zecchin de Fasano, G. (eds.) 2015. Agon. Studies in Honor of Ana-María González de Tobia. La Plata.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Garrido, R. 2021. ‘Ninus and Metiochus in the school of rhetoric: the first Greek novels’, AN 18: 57–75.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 2014. Les mémoriaux de délégations du sanctuaire oraculaire de Claros, d’après la documentation conservée dans le Fonds Louis Robert. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. 1982. ‘Greek translations of Latin literature in the fourth century AD’, YClS 27: 173–215.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R. 1951. ‘Le poète stoïcien Sarapion d’Athènes, ami de Plutarque’, REG 64: 323–7.Google Scholar
Flinterman, J.-J. 1995. Power, Paideia and Pythagoreanism: Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs and Political Ideas in Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 2007. Stratone di Sardi; introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento; foreword di Kathryn Gutzwiller. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 2014. Lucillio, Epigrammi: Introduzione, Testo Critico, Traduzione e Commento. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. 1988. ‘Tragedy and politics in Aristophanes’ Acharnians’, JHS 108: 33–47.Google Scholar
Follet, S. 2001. ‘Un ami de Plutarch: l’orateur Athénien Glaukias’, in Billault, (ed.): 85–96.Google Scholar
Frija, G. 2010a. Les prêtres des empereurs: le culte impérial civique dans la province romaine d’Asie. Rennes.Google Scholar
Frija, G. 2010b. Prosopographie des prêtres du culte impérial dans les cités de la province romaine d’Asie. www.pretres-civiques.org/.Google Scholar
Frijhoff, W. 1991. ‘The kiss, sacred and profane’, in Bremmer, and Rodenburg, : 210–36.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. and Bremer, J. M. 2001. Greek Hymns. Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period. 2 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1990a. ‘Il Testo nel testo: la citazione nel romanzo Greco’, MD 25: 27–48.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1990b. Antonio Diogene. Le Incredibili Avventure al di là di Tule. Palermo.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. and Höschele, R. 2009. ‘Works and nights: Marcus Argentarius (A.P. 9.161)’, Cambridge Classical Journal 55: 59–70.Google Scholar
Galli, M. 2002. Die Lebenswelt eines Sophisten: Untersuchungen zu den Bauten und Stiftungen des Herodes Atticus. Mainz.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L. 1993. ‘L’epigramma dell’imperatore Adriano all’Eros di Tespie’, in Pretagostini, (ed.): iii 1089–1110.Google Scholar
Garnaud, J.-P. 1991. Achille Tatius d’Alexandrie, Le roman de Leucippé et Clitophon. Paris.Google Scholar
Garnett, J. 1895. ‘On the date of the Ἀποτελεσματικά of Manetho’, Journal of Philology 23: 238–40.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1955–7. ‘Paraphrasis Dionysii poematis De aucupio’, Byzantion 25–7: 195–240.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1957. ‘Sull’autore e il titolo del perduto poema Sull’aucupio attribuito ad Oppiano’, GFI 10: 156–60.Google Scholar
Geagan, D. J. 1967. The Athenian Constitution after Sulla. Hesperia Suppl. 12. Princeton.Google Scholar
Geagan, D. J. 1991. ‘The Sarapion monument and the quest for status in Roman Athens’, ZPE 85: 145–65.Google Scholar
Geissen, A. 2005. ‘The nome coins of Roman Egypt’, in Howgego, Heuchert and Burnett, (eds.): 167–70.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D. H. J. 1998. Lucian’s Science Fiction Novel, True Histories: Interpretation and Commentary. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1990. ‘Ein Epigramm des Bianor Gow-Page, Garl. Phil., 1731 ff.’, AC 59: 179–80.Google Scholar
Giannuzzi, M. E. 2007. Stratone di Sardi. Epigrammi. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Lecce.Google Scholar
Giuseppetti, M. 2011. ‘Miti e culti tra Attica e Argolide nell’ Ecale di Callimaco’, in Mortira, A., Cozzoli, A.-T. and Giuseppetti, M. (eds.), Callimachea II. Atti della seconda giornata di studi su Callimaco. Roma: 129–56.Google Scholar
Giuseppetti, M. 2012. ‘Two poets for a goddess: Callimachus’ and Philicus’ hymns to Demeter’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Gods and Religion in Hellenistic Poetry. Hellenistica Groningana 16. Leuven, Paris and Walpole, MA: 103–29.Google Scholar
Gkourogiannis, T. K. 1999. Pindaric Quotations in Aelius Aristides. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 2010. ‘Making space for bicultural identity: Herodes Atticus commemorates Regilla’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), Local Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World. Cambridge: 125–62.Google Scholar
Goette, H. R. 2007. ‘The men who built the theatres: an archaeological appendix’, in Wilson, (ed.): 116–21.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2009. ‘Constructing identity in Philostratus’ Love Letters ’, in Bowie, and Elsner, (eds.): 287–308.Google Scholar
Gómez Cárdo, P. 2008. ‘A propósito de algunos epigramas atribuidos a Luciano’, Synthesis 15: 37–57.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1933. The Population of Athens in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gonis, N. 1997. ‘4418. Apollonius Rhodius Argonautica I 623-33’, in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 64. London.Google Scholar
González Rincón, M. 1996. Estratón de Sardes. Epigramas. Introducción, edición revisada, traducción y comentario. Sevilla.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. L. 2020. ‘(Re-)modelling religious experience’, in Gasparini, V., Patzelt, M., Raja, R., Rieger, A.-K., Rüpke, J. and Rubens Urciuoli, E., Lived Religion in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Berlin: 23–48.Google Scholar
Gosetti-Murrayjohn, A. 2006. ‘Sappho as the tenth Muse in Hellenistic epigram’, Arethusa 39: 21–45.Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1980. ‘Law, custom and myth: aspects of the social position of women in classical Athens’, JHS 100: 43–59.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1980. ‘Milch, Honig und Wein. Zum Verständnis der Libation im griechischen Ritual’, in Perennitas. Studi in onore di Angelo Brelich. Rome: 209–21.Google Scholar
Gren, E. 1941. Kleinasien und Ostbalkan in der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung der römischen Kaiserzeit. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E. 2018. ‘Surveying greatness and magnitude in Herodotus’, in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.): 163–86.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2007. ‘Diomedes Redivivus. A new reading of Mimnermus fr. 14 W2’, Mnemosyne 60: 102–11.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010. The Greeks and their Past. Poetry, Oratory, and History in the Fifth-Century BCE. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. G. 1988. Festinat Senex. Essays in Greek and Latin Literature and Archaeology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 1970. ‘Six passages in Callimachus and the Anthology’, BICS 17: 32–43.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. 1977. ‘Ein neues Fragment aus dem Metiochos-Parthenope Roman (Ostracon Bodl. 2175 = P2 2782)’, ZPE 24: 21–2.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. 2006. Einführung, Übersetzung und Kommentar zum Heroikos von Flavius Philostrat. 2 vols. Basel.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. 2018. ‘Der Heroikos des Flavius Philostrat – eine Nachlese’, WS 131: 13–75.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1993. ‘The Polis in the Hellenistic world’, in Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor: 339–54.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. A. 2007. ‘Meaning and material presence: four epigrams on Timomachus’s unfinished Medea’, TAPhA 137: 305–31.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971a. The Sophists. Cambridge (= History of Greek Philosophy iii 1, Cambridge 1969).Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971b. Socrates. Cambridge (= History of Greek Philosophy iii 2, Cambridge 1969).Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2004. ‘Seeing thought: Timomachus’ Medea and ecphrastic epigram’, AJP 125: 339–86.Google Scholar
Gyselinck, W. and Demoen, K. 2009. ‘Fiction and metafiction in Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii’, in Demoen, K. and Pratt, D. (eds.), Theios Sophistes. Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii. Mnemosyne Suppl. 305. Leiden and Boston: 95–127.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. 1969. Die Inschriften des Asklepieions. Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. Altertümer von Pergamon viii 3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. 1985. Pausanias’ Guide to Ancient Greece. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Hagel, S. and Harrauer, C. (eds.) 2005. Ancient Greek Music in Performance. Symposion Wien 29.9–1.10. 2003 VÖAW. Wiener Studien Beihefte. Wien.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1971. Narrative Technique in Ancient Greek Romances. Studies of Chariton, Xenophon Ephesius, and Achilles Tatius. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1994. ‘Orality, literacy, and the “readership” of the early Greek novel’, in Eriksen, R. (ed.), Contexts of Pre-Novel Narrative: the European Tradition. Berlin and New York: 47–81.Google Scholar
Halfmann, H. 1979. Die Senatoren aus dem östlichen Teil des Imperium Romanum bis zum Ende des 2. Jh. n.Chr. Hypomnemata 58. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Halfmann, H. 1986. Itinera Principum: Geschichte und Typologie der Kaiserreisen im Römischen Reich. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Handley, E. 1982. ‘Aristophanes’ rivals’, Proceedings of the Classical Association 79: 23–5.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1981. ‘The number of Athenian hoplites in 431 BC’, SO 56: 19–32 (repr. in Hansen, 1988).Google Scholar
Hansen, W. 1996. Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Exeter.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. 2012. Callimachus Aetia. Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 1983. Statius and the Silvae. Poets, Patrons and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.) 2005. Metaphor and the Ancient Novel. ANS 4. Groningen.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. K. (eds.) 2018. Interpreting Herodotus. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. 1968. ‘The Socratic self as it is parodied in Aristophanes’ Clouds’, YClS 22: 1–18.Google Scholar
Heberdey, R. and Wilhelm, G. A. 1896. Reisen in Kilikien ausgeführt 1891 und 1892 von R. Heberdey und A. Wilhelm. Denkschrift K. Akad. d. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl., Bd. 44. Wien.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1963–4. Die griechischen Dichterfragmente der römischen Kaiserzeit. 2 vols. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1963. ‘Überlieferungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu Andromachos, Markellos von Side und zum Carmen de viribus herbarum’, NGAW 1963.2: 23–50.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1987. Aristophanes Lysistrata. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2009. Longus: Daphnis and Chloe. Xenophon of Ephesus: Anthia and Habrocomes. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 2011. ‘Missing pages: papyrology, genre, and the Greek novel’, in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R. B. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons. Oxford: 302–22.Google Scholar
Hepding, H. 1910. ‘Die Arbeiten zu Pergamon, 1908–1909: II. Die Inschriften’, AM 35: 401–93.Google Scholar
Hernández Lara, C. 1994. Estudios sobre el Aticismo de Caritón de Afrodisias. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. 1934. ‘Ein Asklepios-Hymnos des Aristeides von Smyrna’, Sitzungsb. Preuss. A. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl. 31: 734–69.Google Scholar
Hess, L. and Corien, B. 2020. ‘Narrator language and character language in Thucydides: A quantitative study of narrative perspective’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 35.3: 557–86.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. 1996. Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass. Die praefatio zu De oratoribus veteribus. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hitzl, K. and Kropp, A. J. M. 2013. ‘Das Heiligtum von Olympia im 2. Jh. n.Chr.’, Boreas 36: 53–89.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2012. ‘Attic idylls: hierarchies of herdsmen and social status in Alciphron and Longus’, JHS 132: 41–53.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2013. ‘Aelian’s Rustic Epistles in the context of his corpus: a reassessment of Aelian’s literary programme and qualities’, in Vox, O. (ed.), Lettere, mimesi, retorica: Studi sull’epistolografia letteraria greca di età imperiale e tardo antica. Lecce: 257–310.Google Scholar
Hodot, R. 1990. Le dialecte éolien d’Asie. La langue des inscriptions VIIe a.C.–IVe p.C. Paris.Google Scholar
Hogarth, D. G., Edgar, C.C. and Gutch, C. 1898–9. ‘Excavations at Naucratis’, ABSA 5: 26–97.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. 1993. Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. London (1st ed. 1988).Google Scholar
Hornblower, N. S. and Spawforth, A. (eds.) 2003. The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. revised. Oxford.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2006. Verrückt nach Frauen. Der Epigrammatiker Rufin. Classica Monacensia 31. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2018. ‘Two lovers and a lion: Pankrates’ poem on Hadrian’s royal hunt’, Philologus 162: 1–23.Google Scholar
Howgego, C. J., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.) 2005. Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. and Leroy, M. 1939. Le mythe du phénix dans les littératures grecque et latine. Liège and Paris.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. 1953. ‘Le dieu Amor chez Properce et chez Longus’, Acad. Roy. de Belgique (Bull. Cl. des lettres et des sc. mor. et pol.) 5.39: 263–70.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1991. The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1998. The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 2006. ‘Virgil, Longus and the Pipes of Pan’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden and Boston: 499–513.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1994. ‘History and historicity in the romance of Chariton’, in ANRW ii 34.2: 1055–86.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1997. ‘Longus and Plato’, in Picone, M. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Der antike Roman und seine mittelalterliche Rezeption. Basel: 15–28 (repr. in Hunter, 2008: 775–89).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (ed.) 1998. Studies in Heliodorus. Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Vol. 21. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1999. Theocritus. A Selection. Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2003. ‘Aspects of technique and style in the “Periegesis” of Dionysius’, in Accorinti, D. and Chuvin, P. (eds.), Des géants à Dionysos: mélanges de mythologie et de poésie grecques offerts à Francis Vian. Alessandria: 343–56 (repr. in Hunter 2008: 700–17).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2004. ‘The Periegesis of Dionysius and the traditions of Hellenistic poetry’, REA 106: 217–31 (repr. in Hunter 2008: 718–36).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2008. On Coming After: Studies in Post-Classical Literature and Its Reception. Berlin.Google Scholar
Inan, J. and Alföldi-Rosenbaum, E., 1979. Römische und frühbyzantinische Portratplastik aus der Turkei. Neue Funde. Mainz.Google Scholar
İplikçioğlu, B. 2014. ‘Heraklit von Rhodiapolis, ein gefeierter Arzt der trajanischen Zeit’, in Fischer, J. (ed.), Der Beitrag Kleinasiens zur Kultur-und Geistesgeschichte der griechisch-römischen Antike. Denkschriften der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historischen Klasse 469. Wien: 231–56.Google Scholar
Irigoin, H., Waltz, P., Laurens, P. and Soury, G. (eds.) 1974. Anthologie Grecque ix. Paris.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. K. 2014. ‘Ethnography and empire: Homer and the Hippocratics in Herodotus’ Ethiopian logos, 3.17–26’, Histos 8: 25–75.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. K. 2018. ‘The end of the Histories and the end of the Atheno-Peloponnesian wars’, in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.): 279–334.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. K. and Greenwood, E. (eds.) 2007. Reading Herodotus. A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Israelowich, I. 2012. Society, Medicine and Religion in the Sacred Tales of Aelius Aristides. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 1981. ‘L’œil et la mémoire: sur la Périégèse de la terre habitée de Denys’, in Jacob, C. and Lestringant, F. (eds.), Arts et légendes d’espaces. Paris: 23–97.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 1990. La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d’Alexandrie, ou, la leçon de géographie. Paris.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. 1813–17. Anthologia Graeca ad fidem codicis olim Palatini nunc Parisini ex apographo Gothano edita. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1987. Aristotle Poetics, with the Tractatus Coislinianus, Reconstruction of Poetics II, and the Fragments of the On Poets, Translated with Notes. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jannasch., A. 1949. Kunst der Gegenwart. Renée Sintenis. Achtundvierzig Bilder. Potsdam.Google Scholar
Jensson, G. 2004. The Recollections of Petronius: The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction. ANS 2. Groningen.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, D. 2015. Latin Poetry and the Idea of Rome in the Greek Novel. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1952. ‘The economic basis of Athenian democracy’, Past and Present 1: 13–31 (repr. in Jones, 1957: 3–21).Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1974. ‘The reliability of Philostratus’, in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic. University Park, PA: 11–16.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1980. ‘Apuleius’ Metamorphoses and Lollianos’ Phoinikika’, Phoenix 34: 243–54.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1992a. ‘La personnalité de Chariton’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 161–7.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1992b. ‘Hellenistic history in Chariton of Aphrodisias’, Chiron 22: 91–102.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1997. Review of J. M. Mossman, Plutarch and His Intellectual World, London 1997, EMC 1997: 527–30.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1998. ‘The pancratiasts Helix and Alexander on an Ostian mosaic’, JRA 11: 293–8.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2001a. ‘Pausanias and his guides’, in Alcock, Cherry and Elsner, (eds.): 33–9.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. and Smith, R. R. R. 1994. ‘Two inscribed monuments of Aphrodisias’, Archaeologischer Anzeiger 3: 455–72.Google Scholar
Jong, I. de, 2012. ‘The Helen logos and Herodotus’ fingerprint’, in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.): 127–42.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.) 2002. A Companion to the Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaimio, M. 1996. ‘How to enjoy a Greek novel: Chariton guiding his audience’, Arctos 30: 49–73.Google Scholar
Karageorghis, V. 1981. Ancient Cyprus: 7,000 Years of Art and Archaeology. Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Kazanskaya, M. 2019. ‘Indirect tradition on Sappho’s kertomia’, in Currie, and Rutherford, (eds.): 257–76.Google Scholar
Keil, J. 1930. ‘Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Ephesos’, JÖAI 26 Beiblatt: 57–8.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1987. ‘“Arcades ambo”: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia’, Hermathena 143: 47–59.Google Scholar
Keydell, R. 1941. ‘Die griechische Dichtung der Kaiserzeit’, Bursians Jahresbericht 272. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kienast, D. 1995. ‘Zu den Homonoia-Vereinbarungen in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, ZPE 109: 267–82.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2010. Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2017. ‘The trouble with Calasiris: duplicity and autobiographical narrative in Heliodorus and Galen’, Mnemosyne 72: 229–49.Google Scholar
Kirbihler, F. 2009. ‘Territoire civique et population d’Éphèse (ve siècle av. J.-C.–iiie siècle apr. J.-C.)’, in Bru, H., Kirbihler, F. and Lebreton, S. (eds.), L’Asie Mineure dans l’Antiquité: échanges, populations et territoires: regards actuels sur une péninsule. Actes du colloque de Tours, 21–22 octobre 2005. Rennes: 301–33.Google Scholar
Kirbihler, F. 2016. Des Grecs et des Italiens à Ephèse: histoire d’une intégration croisée: 133 a.C.–48 p.C. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. 2011. The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. 2008. ‘ΤΟΣΣ’ ΕΔΑΗΝ: The Poetics of Knowledge in Oppian’s Halieutica’, Ramus 37: 32–59.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. 2017. ‘The limits of enquiry in imperial Greek didactic poetry’, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge: 203–30.Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. 1992. ‘Sept années de recherches sur l’épigraphie de la Béotie (1985–1991)’, Chiron 22: 411–503.Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. 1996. ‘La réorganisation du concours des Mouseia à l’époque hellénistique: esquisse d’une solution nouvelle’, in Hurst, A. and Schachter, A., La montagne des Muses. Genève: 141–67.Google Scholar
Kondoleon, C. 1994. Domestic and Divine: Roman Mosaics in the House of Dionysos. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1994. Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres. Princeton.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2009. ‘Le courage dans le roman grec: de Chariton à Xénophon d’Éphèse, avec une référence a Philon d’Alexandrie’, in Pouderon, B. and Bost-Pouderon, C. (eds.), Passions, vertus et vices dans l’ancien roman. Lyon: 117–26.Google Scholar
Korres, M. 2002. ‘Modell des Dionysos-Theaters’, in Die griechische Klassik: Idee oder Wirklichkeit. Exhibition March 1st–June 2nd, 2002, Berlin. Mainz: 540–1.Google Scholar
Kossaifi, C. 2012. ‘The legend of Phatta in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, AJPh 133: 573–600.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. 2013. ‘Dancing dolphins on the wine-dark sea’, in Kowalzig, and Wilson, (eds.): 31–58.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. 2005. Simonides on the Persian Wars. A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the ‘New Simonides’. New York and London.Google Scholar
Krausse, D. 1996. Hochdorf. 3: Das Trink- und Speiseservice aus dem späthallstattzeitlichen Fürstengrab von Eberdingen-Hochdorf (Kr. Ludwigsburg). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kruchió, B. 2017. ‘What Charicles knew: fragmentary narration and ambiguity in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, AN 14: 175–94.Google Scholar
Laplace, M. 2007. Le roman d’Achille Tatios: ‘discours panégyrique’ et imaginaire romanesque. Bern and Oxford.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. 1959. ‘Aux origines de l’Anthologie: II. Les Thalysies de Théocrite’, RhM 102: 307–30.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1986. ‘The empirical element in the methods of early Greek medical writers and Herodotus: a shared epistemological response’, Antichthon 20: 1–20.Google Scholar
Laurens, P. 1965. ‘Martial et l’épigramme grecque du 1er siècle après J.-C.’, REL 43: 315–41.Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1954. ‘Der Demeterhymnos des Philikos’, MH 11: 1–19 (repr. in his Kleine Schriften zu Religion, Recht, Literatur und Sprache der Griechen und Röme, eds. Gigon, O., Buchwald, W. and Kunkel., W. München 1968: 539–58).Google Scholar
Lebek, W. 1973. ‘Ein Hymnus auf Antinoos (Mitford, the Inscriptions of Kourion No. 104)’, ZPE 12: 101–37.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. and Fant, M. B. 1992. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome: A Source Book in Translation (1st ed. 1982). London.Google Scholar
Lefteratou, A. 2018. Mythological Narratives: The Bold and Faithful Heroines of the Greek Novel. Berlin.Google Scholar
Legras, B. 1999. Néotês: recherches sur les jeunes Grecs dans l’Egypte ptolémaïque et romaine. Genève.Google Scholar
Le Guen, B. 2001. Les associations de technites dionysiaques à l’époque hellénistique. 2 vols. Nancy.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. 1910. De Achillis Tatii aetate. Accedit corollarium De Achillis Tatii studiis Lucianeis. Dissertation, Wroclaw.Google Scholar
Lenormant, C. 1847. François Gérard, peintre d’histoire: essai de biographie et de critique, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1903. ‘Virgils erste und neunte Ecloge’, Hermes 38: 1–18 (repr. in Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, 2 vols. Roma 1960).Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1966. A History of Greek Literature (= Geschichte der Griechischen Literatur, transl. by Willis, J. and de Heer, C.). London.Google Scholar
Leue, C. 1925. ‘Noch einmal die Akrostichen in der Periegese des Dionysios’, Hermes 60: 367–80.Google Scholar
LeVen, P. 2014. The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Levin, D. N. 1977. ‘To whom did the ancient novelists address themselves?’, Rivista di studi classici 25: 18–29.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. 1955. ‘Notes on Attic Inscriptions (II). XXIII Who was Lysistrata?’, ABSA 50: 1–12.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, C. S. 1988. ‘Facts and fiction – the third siege of Nisibis (AD 350)’, Historia 37: 107–25.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 2014. Dionysius Periegetes, Description of the Known World. With Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lohse, G. 1966, ‘Die Kunstauffassung im VII Idyll Theokrits und das Programm des Kallimachos’, Hermes 94: 413–25.Google Scholar
López Martínez, M. P. 2019. ‘The Ninus romance: new textual and contextual studies’, Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete 65.1: 20–44.Google Scholar
L’Orange, H.-P. and van Gerkan, A. 1939. Der spätantike Bildschmuck des Konstantinbogens. Studien zur Spätantiken Kunstgeschichte 10. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1962. ‘The manuscript evidence for changes of speaker in Aristophanes’, BICS 9: 27–42.Google Scholar
Luginbill, R. D. 2001–2. ‘A delightful possession: Longus’ Prologue and Thucydides’, CJ 97: 233–47.Google Scholar
Lulli, L. 2011. Narrare in distichi. L’elegia greca arcaica e classica di argomento storico-mitico. Seminari romani di cultura greca, Quaderni 13. Rome.Google Scholar
Luz, C. 2010. Technopaignia. Formspiele in der griechischen Dichtung. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Ma, J. 2007. ‘The worlds of Nestor the poet’, in Swain, S. C. R., Harrison, S. J. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge: 83–133.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1971. Aristophanes Wasps. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. 2012. Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: Engaging Homer in Late Antiquity. Mnemosyne Suppl. 343. Leiden.Google Scholar
Macleod, M. D. 1967. Lucian, with an English translation. Vol. viii. London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
MacQueen, B. D. 1990. Myth, Rhetoric and Fiction: a Reading of Longus’s Daphnis and Chloe. Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. 2007a. ‘Meter and diction: from refinement to mannerism’, in Bing, and Bruss, (eds.): 165–83.Google Scholar
Mai, A. 1823. M. Cornelii Frontonis et M. Avrelii imperatoris epistvlae. L. Veri et Antonini Pii et Appiani epistvlarvm reliqviae. Fragmenta Frontonis et scripta grammatica. Editio prima romana plvs centvm epistvlis avcta ex codice rescripto Bibliothecae pontificiae Vaticanae cvrante Angelo Maio bibliothecae eivsdem praefecto. Roma.Google Scholar
Manieri, A. (ed.) 2009. Agoni poetico musicali nella Grecia antica. 1. Beozia. Testi e commenti 25; Certamina musica graeca 1. Pisa/Roma.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. 2004. ‘Griechische Kunst und römischer Stil: Zum Eurotas-Epigramm des Philipp von Thessalonike (AP 9.709 = GP I 63)’, WJA N.F. 28a: 35–48.Google Scholar
Maróth, M. 1979. ‘Le siège de Nisibe en 350 ap. J.C. d’après les sources syriennes’, AAntHung 27: 239–43.Google Scholar
Martin, F. 1982. La documentación griega de la cancillería del emperador Adriano. Pamplona.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 1994. ‘The anti-individualistic ideology of Hellenistic culture’, Numen 41: 117–40.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 1978. ‘Fabula Graecanica: Apuleius and his Greek sources’, in Hijmans, B. L. and van der Paardt, R. T. (eds.), Aspects of the Golden Ass. Groningen: 1–15 (repr. in S. J. Harrison (ed.), Oxford Readings in the Roman Novel. Oxford 1999: 217–36).Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 2004. ‘Sappho’s apples’, in Zimmerman, M. and van der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Leuven and Dudley, MA: 243–53.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 2018. ‘Hunters’ dedications: Longus and Lesbos’, in Chew, Morgan and Trzaskoma, (eds.): 137–47.Google Scholar
Massimilla, G. 2016. ‘Nel laboratorio del parafraste: i richiami alla poesia ellenistica nella Parafrasi del Vangelo di San Giovanni di Nonno di Panopoli’, Prometheus 42: 249–79.Google Scholar
Matthews, V. J. (ed.) 1996. Antimachus of Colophon: Text and Commentary. Mnemosyne Suppl. 155. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
May, R. 2010. ‘An Ass from Oxyrhynchus: P.Oxy. LXX.4762, Loukios of Patrae and the Milesian Tales’, AN 8: 59–84.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. forthcoming. ‘Crinagoras of Mytilene and Octavia’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Arthur-Montagne, J. and Vasunia, P. (eds.) Hellenistic Literature and Culture: Studies in Honor of Susan A. Stephens. London.Google Scholar
Mayor, H. B. 1939. ‘The strategi at Athens in the fifth century. When did they enter on office?’, JHS 59: 45–64.Google Scholar
Melfi, M. 2010. ‘Ritual spaces and performances in the Asklepieia of Roman Greece’, ABSA 105: 317–38.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1988. Die Hirten des Dionysos: die Dionysos-Mysterien der römischen Kaiserzeit und der bukolische Roman des Longus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. and Stauber, J. (eds.) 1998–2004. Steinepigramme aus dem griechischen Osten. 5 vols. Stuttgart. 2001 vol. ii. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mesk, J. 1927. ‘Zu den Prosa und Vershymnen des Aelius Aristides’, in Gemelli, A. (ed.) Raccolta di scritti in onore di F. Ramorino. Milan: 660–72.Google Scholar
Mignogna, E. 1996a. ‘Narrativa greca e mimo: il romanzo di Achille Tazio’, SIFC iii 14: 232–42.Google Scholar
Mignogna, E. 1996b. ‘Il mimo Leucippe: un’ ipotesi su PBerol inv. 13927 [Pack2 2437]’, RCCM 38: 161–6.Google Scholar
Miguelez-Cavero, L. 2013. Triphiodorus, The Sack of Troy: A General Study and a Commentary. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Miguélez-Cavero, L. 2016. ‘Nonnus and the novel’, in Accorinti, D. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Nonnus of Panopolis. Leiden and Boston: 549–73.Google Scholar
Millis, B. W. and Olson, S. D. 2012. Inscriptional Records for the Dramatic Festivals in Athens: IG II2 2318–2325 and Related Texts. Leiden.Google Scholar
Milne, J. G. 1933. University of Oxford. Ashmolean Museum. Catalogue of Alexandrian Coins. Oxford and London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1990. ‘Festivals, games, and civic life in Roman Asia Minor’, a review of Wörrle 1998 in JRS 80: 183–93.Google Scholar
Mitford, T. B. 1971. The Inscriptions of Kourion. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 83. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2012. ‘The (cultural) harmony of nature: music, love, and order in Daphnis and Chloe’, TAPhA 142: 133–56.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2020a. ‘The silences of Chariclea in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica: from cunning to shame’, in Papadodima, (ed.): 73–83.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2020b. Musaeus’ Hero and Leander. Introduction, Greek Text, Translation and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 2004. Vision and Narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moretti, J.-C. 1999–2000. ‘The theatre of the sanctuary of Dionysos Eleuthereus in late 5th century Athens’, ICS 24–5: 377–98.Google Scholar
Moretti, L. 1978. ‘Frammento di inno tardo-stoico sulla creazione’, in Gasperini, L. (ed.), Scritti storico-epigrafici in memoria di M. Zambelli. Roma: 251–6.Google Scholar
Moretti, L. 1981. ‘Iscrizioni di Tespie della prima età imperiale’, Athenaeum 59: 71–7.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1978. A Commentary on the Ninth and Tenth Books of the Aithiopica of Heliodoros. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1985. ‘Lucian’s True Histories and the Wonders beyond Thule of Antonios Diogenes’, CQ 35: 475–90.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1989b. ‘The story of Knemon in Heliodorus’ Aithiopika’, JHS 109: 99–113 (repr. in Swain 1999: 259–85).Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1993. ‘Make-believe and make believe: the fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter: 175–229.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1994. ‘Daphnis and Chloe: love’s own sweet story’, in Morgan, and Stoneman, (eds.): 64–79.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 2004. Longus Daphnis and Chloe, with an Introduction, Translation and Notes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 2021. ‘Longus’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 692–714.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. and Harrison, S. J. 2008. ‘Intertextuality’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel. Cambridge: 218–36.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. and Stoneman, R. (eds.) 1994. Greek Fiction: The Greek Novel in Context. London.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2008. The Politics of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. M. 2007. ‘Heracles, Prometheus, and the play of genres in [Lucian]’s Amores’, in Swain, Elsner and Harrison, (eds.): 146–59.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1989. ‘The stranger’s stratagem: self-disclosure and self-sufficiency in Greek culture’, JHS 109: 114–33.Google Scholar
Moulin, M. 1983. ‘Daphnis et Chloé dans l’œuvre de François Gérard (1770–1837)’, Revue du Louvre et des Musées de France 2: 100–9.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. 1981. ‘Der griechische Roman’, in Vogt, E. (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft ii, Griechische Literatur. Wiesbaden: 377–412.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. 1920. Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur. Philologus Suppl. 13.2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2001. Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1983a. ‘The Greek symposion in history’, in Gabba, E. (ed.), Tria Corda: scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigilano. Como: 257–72 (repr. in Murray, 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1983b. ‘The symposion as social organisation’, in Hägg, R. (ed.), The Greek Renaissance of the Eighth Century BC: Tradition and Innovation. Stockholm: 195–9 (repr. in Murray 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1985. ‘Symposium and genre in the poetry of Horace’, JRS 75: 39–50 (repr. in Murray 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1996. ‘Hellenistic royal symposia’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L. and Zahn, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship. Aarhus: 15–27 (repr. in Murray 2018).Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2015. ‘Herodotus and a courtesan from Naucratis’, Classical Inquiries 2015.07.01: http://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/herodotus-and-a-courtesan-from-naucratis/.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2018. ‘Herodotus on queens and courtesans of Egypt’, in Bowie, (ed.): 109–22.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2019. ‘Homo ludens at play with the songs of Sappho: experiments in comparative reception theory, Part Two’, Classical Inquiries 2019.01.16: https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/homo-ludens-at-play-with-the-songs-of-sappho-experiments-in-comparative-reception-theory-part-two/.Google Scholar
Nannini, S. 1982. ‘Alcm. fr. 50b P. ‘ἼΝΩ ΣΑΛΑΣΣΟΜΈΔΟΙΣ’ ἋΝ ἈΠῸ ΜΑΣΔΩΝ’, Sileno 7: 49–51.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. 2002. Poetry for Patrons. Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Mnemosyne Suppl. 206. Leiden.Google Scholar
Neppi Modona, Α. 1933. L’isola di Coo nell’Antichità classica: delineazione storica in base alle fonti letterarie e ai documenti archeologici ed epigrafici. Mem. ist. storico-arch. di Rodi 1. Rodi.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. and van Hosen, H. B. 1959. Greek Horoscopes. Mem. Amer. Philos. Soc. 48. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2003. ‘Art and identity in Asia Minor’ in Scott, S. and Webster, J. (eds.), Roman Imperialism and Provincial Art. Cambridge: 192–213.Google Scholar
Newiger, H.-J. 1980. ‘War and peace in the comedies of Aristophanes’, YClS 26: 219–37 (repr. in Segal, E. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Aristophanes. Oxford 1997: 143–61).Google Scholar
Nikolaou, K. 1967. ‘Excavations at Nea Paphos, the House of Dionysos: outline of the campaigns 1964–1965’, RDAC 100–25.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2005. Lucian’s Self-Conscious Fiction. Theory in Practice. PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2008. ‘Pseudo-documentarism and the limits of ancient fiction’, AJPh 129: 403–31.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2014. Reading Fiction with Lucian: Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nisbet, G. 2003. Greek Epigram in the Roman Empire. Martial’s Forgotten Rivals. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1978. ‘Felicitas at Surrentum (Statius, Silvae II. 2)’, JRS 68: 1–11.Google Scholar
Nobili, C. 2020. ‘The sanctuary of Delphi in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica: between material culture and intertextuality’, AN 16: 15–36.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1913. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig.Google Scholar
North, H. 1952. ‘The use of poetry in the training of the ancient orator’, Traditio 8: 1–33.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1982. ‘Aristophanes and Socrates on learning practical wisdom’, YClS 26: 43–97.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2005. ‘4708. Archilochus, elegies (more of VI 854 and XXX 2507)’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 69. London: 19–42.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2006b. ‘4762: Narrative Romance’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 70. London: 22–9.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. and Trnka-Amrhein, Y. 2009. ‘4948. Achilles Tatius, Leucippe and Clitophon ii 37.8–10, 38.4’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 73. London: 119–22.Google Scholar
Oesterheld, C. 2008. Göttliche Botschaften für zweifelnde Menschen: Pragmatik und Orientierungsleistung der Apollon-Orakel von Klaros und Didyma in hellenistisch-römischer Zeit. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2004. ‘The Apprentice’s Sorcerer: Pancrates and his powers in context (Lucian, Philopseudes 33–36)’, AClass 47: 101–26.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, K. 2007. The Symposia in the Greek and Roman World of the High Empire: Literary Forms and Intellectual Realities. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. 1936. ‘The Sarapion monument and the Paean of Sophocles’, Hesperia 5: 91–122.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. 1967. ‘The Sacred Gerusia and the Emperor’s Consilium’, Hesperia 36: 329–35.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. 1970. Marcus Aurelius. Aspects of Civic and Cultural Policy in the East. Hesperia Suppl. 15. Princeton.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Η. 1989. Greek Constitutions of Early Roman Emperors from Inscriptions and Papyri. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. 2006. Athenaeus. The Learned Banqueters. Books iii.106e–v. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, J. N. 1995. Xenophon of Ephesus. His Compositional Technique and the Birth of the Novel. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, J. N. 2014. ‘Xenophon, The Ephesian Tales ’, in Cueva, and Byrne, (eds.): 43–61.Google Scholar
Ott, U. 1969. Die Kunst des Gegensatzes in Theokrits Hirtengedichten. Spudasmata 22. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Overduin, F. 2018. ‘The didactic aesthetics of Marcellus’ De piscibus (GDRK 63)’, AJP 139: 31–57.Google Scholar
Pack, R. A. 1965. The Greek and Latin Literary Texts from Greco-Roman Egypt, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Padel, R. S. 1992. In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, S., Schmeling, G. and Paschalis, M. (eds.), 2015. Holy Men and Charlatans in the Ancient Novel. ANS 19. Groningen.Google Scholar
Papastamati-von Moock, C. 2014. ‘The theatre of Dionysus Eleuthereus in Athens: new data and observations on its “Lycurgan’ phase”, in Csapo, E., Goette, H. R., Green, J. R. and Wilson, P. (eds.), The Greek Theatre in the Fourth Century BC. Berlin and Boston: 15–76.Google Scholar
Papastamati-von Moock, C. 2015. ‘The wooden theatre of Dionysos Eleuthereus in Athens: old issues, new research’, in Frederiksen, R., Gebhard, E. R. and Sokolicek, A. (eds.), The Architecture of the Ancient Greek Theatre: Acts of an International Conference at the Danish Institute at Athens 27–30 January 2012. Aarhus: 39–73.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 1974a. ‘P.Oxy. 3010. Narrative about Iolaus’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 42. London: 34–41.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 1974b. ‘3012. Romance (Antonius Diogenes?)’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 42. London: 43–6.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 1989a. ‘3836. Achilles Tatius 3.21–3’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 56. London: 62–6.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 1989b. ‘3837. Achilles Tatius 8.6.14–8.7.6’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 56. London: 66–9.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 1992. ‘3965. Simonides, Elegies’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 59. London: 4–50.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 2006a. ‘4760. Antonius Diogenes’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 70. London: 9–15.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 2006b. ‘4761 Novel. (Antonius Diogenes?)’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 70. London: 15–22.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 2007. ‘4811. Novel (“Panionis”)’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 71. London: 47–53.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 2010. ‘Panionis and the culture of culture (P.Oxy. LXXI 4811)’, in Bastianini, and Casanova, (eds.): 43–9.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 2018. ‘5354. Antonius Diogenes’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 83. London: 54–63.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. 2005. ‘The narrator as hunter: Longus, Virgil and Theocritus’, in Harrison, S. J., Paschalis, M., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel. ANS 4. Groningen: 50–67.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S. and Schmeling, G. (eds.) 2013. Real and Ideal in the Ancient Novel. ANS 17. Groningen.Google Scholar
Pattoni, M. P. 2004. ‘I Pastoralia di Longo e la contaminazione dei generi. Alcune proposte interpretative’, MD 53: 83–123.Google Scholar
Paulsen, T. 1992. Inszenierung des Schicksals: Tragödie und Komödie im Roman des Heliodor. Bochumer Altertumswissenschaftscolloquium 10. Trier.Google Scholar
Pearce, T. E. V. 1987. ‘The function of the locus amoenus in Theocritus’ seventh poem’, RhM 131: 276–304.Google Scholar
Pecere, O. and Stramaglia, A. 1996. La letteratura di consumo: atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino, 14–17 settembre 1994. Cassino.Google Scholar
Peek, W. 1979. ‘Zu den Gedichten des Marcellus von Side auf Regilla und das Triopion des Herodes Atticus’, ZPE 33: 76–84.Google Scholar
Penzel, J. 2006. Variation und Imitation. Ein literarischer Kommentar zu den Epigrammen des Antipater von Sidon und des Archias von Antiocheia. Trier.Google Scholar
Pera, R. 1984. Homonoia sulle monete da Augusto agli Antonini. Studio storico-tipoligico. Genova.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. 1930. ‘Chariton and his romance from a literary-historical point of view’, AJPh 51: 93–134.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. 2009. ‘Epigrammatic contests, poeti vaganti and local history’, in Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I. (eds.), Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Panhellenism. Cambridge: 195–216.Google Scholar
Perusino, F. 1989. Platonio: la commedia greca. Edizione critica, traduzione e commento. Urbino.Google Scholar
Petsalis-Diomidis, A. 2010. Truly beyond Wonders: Aelius Aristides and the Cult of Asklepios. Oxford.Google Scholar
Petzke, G. 1970. Die Traditionen über Apollonius von Tyana und das Neue Testament. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pflaum, H.-G. 1960–1. Les carrières procuratoriennes équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain. 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. 1988. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens, 2nd ed. revised by Gould, J. and Lewis, D. M. 1968 with addenda 1988. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pirenne-Delforge, V. and Pironti, G. 2014. ‘Héra et Zeus à Lesbos: Entre poésie lyrique et décret civique’, ZPE 191: 27–31.Google Scholar
Pithou, P. 1590. Epigrammata et poematia vetera ex codicibus et lapidibus collecta, i. Paris.Google Scholar
Plassart, A. 1926. ‘Fouilles de Thespies et de l’Hiéron des Muses de l’Hélicon: inscriptions’, BCH 50: 383–462.Google Scholar
Pleket, H. W. 1965. ‘An aspect of the emperor cult: imperial mysteries’, HThR 58: 331–64.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 2019. ‘The Hymn of Mesomedes on Antinous (Inscriptions of Courion, Mitford No. 104)’, GRMS 7: 128–39.Google Scholar
Poignault, R. and Schneider, C. (eds.) 2016. Fabrique de la déclamation antique: (controverses et suasoires). Lyon.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 1981. ‘Women in Roman Egypt’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: 303–22.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 2007. The Murder of Regilla: A Case of Domestic Violence in Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pouilloux, J. 1983. ‘Delphes dans les Éthiopiques d’Héliodore; la réalité dans la fiction’, JS 4: 259–86.Google Scholar
Prauscello, Lucia. 2011. ‘Μελίβοια: the Chthonia of Hermione and Kore’s lost epithet in Lasus fr. 702 PMG’, CQ 61: 19–27.Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. 2013. ‘Demeter and Dionysos in the sixth-century Argolid: Lasos of Hermione, the cult of Demeter Chthonia and the origins of dithyramb’, in Kowalzig, and Wilson, (eds.): 76–92.Google Scholar
Préaux, C. 1929.‘Lettres privées grecques d’Égypte relatives à l’éducation’, RBPh 8: 757–800.Google Scholar
Pretagostini, R. (ed.) 1993. Tradizione e innovazione nella cultura greco da Omero all’età ellenistica: scritti in onore di Bruno Gentili. 3 vols. Roma.Google Scholar
Provenzale, F. 2009. Filico di Corcira: testimonianze e frammenti. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. PhD dissertation, Università degli studi “Roma Tre”, https://core.ac.uk/display/41157713.Google Scholar
Puech, B. 2002. Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d’époque impériale. Avec préface de L. Pernot. Paris.Google Scholar
Quet, M. H. 1992. ‘Romans grecs, mosaïques romaines’, in Baslez, , Hoffmann, and Trédé, (eds.): 125–60.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. 1916. ‘Der Dichter Pankrates’, Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 883–4.Google Scholar
Radt, W. 1988. Pergamon. Geschichte und Bauten, Funde und Erforschung einer antiken Metropole. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rattenbury, R. M., Lumb, T. W. and Maillon, J. 1960. Héliodore. Les Éthiopiques (Théagène et Chariclée), 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Raynor, D. H. 1984. ‘Moeragenes and Philostratus: two views of Apollonius of Tyana’, CQ 34: 223–8.Google Scholar
Rea, J. R. 1972. ‘2946. Triphiodorus, Fall of Troy, 391–402’, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 41. London.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. 1971. Courants littéraires grecs des iième et iiième siècles après J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (ed.) 1989. Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. 2004. Chariton Aphrodisiensis. De Callirhoe narrationes amatoriae. München and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. 1982. Longus, Daphnis & Chloe (1st ed. 1982, 2nd ed. 1986, 3rd ed. 1994). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Regenauer, J. 2016. Mesomedes: Übersetzung und Kommentar. Studien zur klassischen Philologie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Repath, I. 2005. ‘Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon: what happened next?’, CQ 55: 250–65.Google Scholar
Repath, I. 2011. ‘Platonic love and erotic education in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, in Doulamis, K. (ed.), Echoing Narratives: Studies of Intertextuality in Greek and Roman Prose Fiction. ANS 13. Groningen: 99–122.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. 2006. Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reyhl, K. 1969. Antonios Diogenes: Untersuchungen zu den Romanfragmenten der Wunder jenseits von Thule und zu den Wahren Geschichten des Lukian. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. 1999. ‘The first known Aphrodisian to hold a procuratorship’, in Scherrer, P., Taueber, H. and Thür, H. (eds.), Steine und Wege. Festschrift für Dieter Knibbe zum 65. Geburtstag. Wien: 327–34.Google Scholar
Rife, J. R. 2002. ‘Officials of the Roman provinces in Xenophon’s Ephesiaca’, ZPE 138: 93–108.Google Scholar
Rife, J. R. 2008. ‘The burial of Herodes Atticus: élite identity, urban society, and public memory in Roman Greece’, JHS 128: 92–127.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1960. ‘Recherches épigraphiques iv–ix’, REA 62: 276–361 (repr. in Opera Minora Selecta ii, Amsterdam 1969: 792–877).Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1968. ‘L’épigrammes satiriques de Lucilius sur les athlètes’, in L’épigramme grec. Entretiens Hardt 14. Vandoeuvres-Genève: 179–295.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1978b. ‘Documents d’Asie Mineure V–XVII’, BCH 102: 395–543 (repr. in Opera Minora Selecta vi, Amsterdam 1987: 91–239).Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1979. ‘Un voyage d’Antiphilos de Byzance, Anthologie Palatine X, 17, géographie antique et byzantine’, JS: 257–94.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1980a. A travers l’Asie Mineure: poètes et prosateurs, monnaies grecques, voyageurs et géographie. Paris.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1980b. ‘Deux poètes grecs à l’époque impériale’, in ΣΤΗΛΗ. Τόμος εἰς μνήμην τοῦ Νικόλαου Κοντολέοντος. Αθήνα: 1–20.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1981. ‘Une épigramme satirique d’Automédon et Athènes au début de l’empire’, REG 94: 338–61.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1982. ‘La date de l’épigrammatiste Rufinus. Philologie et réalité’, CRAI 126: 50–63.Google Scholar
Robert, J. and L. 1948. ‘Inscriptions de la vallée du Haut Caïque’, Hellenica 6: 80–8.Google Scholar
Robiano, P. 2020. ‘Nommer les personnages perses dans le roman grec: les choix de Chariton, Callirhoé, et d’Héliodore, les Éthiopiques’, AN 17: 63–89.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. 2012. ‘Helikon and the Valley of the Muses. The production of a sacred space’, JRA 25: 227–58.Google Scholar
Roesch, P. 2007–9. Les Inscriptions de Thespies (IThesp), Fasc. I–XII, Concordances. Édition électronique mise en forme par Gilbert Argoud, Albert Schachter et Guy Vottéro, et publiée sous l’égide de l’UMR 5189 – HiSoMA (Histoire et Sources des Mondes Antiques). Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, Lyon. www.hisoma.mom.fr/production-scientifique/les-inscriptions-de-thespies.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. M. 1991. The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City. London.Google Scholar
Rommel, H. 1923. Die naturwissenschaftlich-paradoxographischen Exkurse bei Philostratos, Heliodoros und Achilleus Tatios. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Roos, A. G. 1968. Arriani quae exstant omnia, II: Scripta minora et fragmenta, 2nd ed. Addenda et corrigenda adiecit Wirth, G.. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 1988. Old Comedy and the Iambographic Tradition. American Classical Studies 19. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1992. The Poetics of Imitation: Anacreon and the Anacreontic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 2001. Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 2008. ‘Greek verse inscriptions in Roman Egypt: Julia Balbilla’s Sapphic voice’, ClAnt 27: 334–58.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 2018a. The Language of Ruins: Greek and Latin Inscriptions on the Memnon Colossus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Roueche, C. M. 1993. Performers and Partisans at Aphrodisias in the Roman and Late Roman Periods: A Study Based on Inscriptions from the Current Excavations at Aphrodisias in Caria. Journal of Roman Studies Monographs 6. London.Google Scholar
Rougemont, G. 1992. ‘Delphes chez Héliodore’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 93–9.Google Scholar
Ruiz Montero, C. 1991. ‘Aspects of the vocabulary of Chariton of Aphrodisias’, CQ 41: 484–9.Google Scholar
Ruiz Montero, C. 1994. ‘Chariton von Aphrodisias: Ein Überblick’, ANRW ii 34.2: 1006–54.Google Scholar
Ruiz Montero, C. 2013. ‘Antonio Diogenes autór de comedia? Observaciónes sobre la recepción de la comedia en epoca imperial’, in Pino Campos, L. M., Santana Henriquez, G. and López Férez, J. A. (eds.), Καλὸς καὶ ἀγαθὸς ἀνήρ· διδασκάλου παράδειγμα. Madrid: 749–56.Google Scholar
Ruiz Montero, C. 2018. ‘Personal names in Antonius Diogenes’ Incredible Things beyond Thule’, in Papaioannou, A., Michalopoulos, A. N. and Zissos, A. (eds.), Dicite, Pierides: Classical Studies in Honour of Stratis Kyriakides. Newcastle: 107–23.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. 2000. ‘The genealogy of the boukoloi: how Greek literature appropriated an Egyptian narrative motif’, JHS 120: 106–21.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. 2004. ‘χορὸς ἐκ τῆσδε τῆς πόλεως (Xen. Mem. 3.3.12): song-dance and state-pilgrimage at Athens’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of “Mousike” in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: 67–90.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. 2009. ‘Black sails to Achilles. Pilgrimage and initiation in Philostratus’ Heroicus ’, in Bowie, and Elsner, (eds.): 230–47.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. 2013. State Pilgrims and Sacred Observers in Ancient Greece. A Study of Theōriā and Theōroi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. 2015. ‘Stesichorus the romantic’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (eds.): 98–108.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 1977. ‘Oracles et devins dans le roman grec’, in Heintz, J. G. (ed.), Oracles et prophéties dans l’antiquité. Paris: 367–403.Google Scholar
Sajdak, J. 1914–15. ‘Spór o Hadrianowe żegnanie się ze światem’, Eos 20: 147–58 (repr. in Sajdak, J., Pod urokiem literatury patrystycznej i bizantyńskiej. Poznań 2009: 192–207).Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1989. ‘Patronage and friendship in early imperial Rome: drawing the distinction’, in Wallace-Hadrill, A. F. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society. London: 49–62.Google Scholar
Salvo, I. 2013. ‘Romulus and Remus at Chios revisited: a re-examination of SEG XXX 1073’, in Martzavou, P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), Epigraphical Approaches to the Post-Classical Polis: Fourth Century BC to Second Century AD. Oxford: 125–37.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. 1977. ‘Les structures socio-économiques du roman de Xénophon d’Éphèse’, REG 90: 249–62.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. 1981. ‘Metastasi narratologica del dato storico nel romanzo erotico greco’, Materiali e contributi per la storia della narrativa greco-latina 3: 341–67.Google Scholar
Schachter, A. 1981. Cults of Boiotia, fasc. 1 Acheloos to Hera. BICS Suppl. 38.1. London.Google Scholar
Schachter, A. 1986. Cults of Boiotia, fasc. 2 Herakles to Poseidon. BICS Suppl. 38.2. London.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. and Hosius, C. 1922[1969]. Geschichte der römischen Literatur, bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian. III. Die Zeit von Hadrian 117 bis auf Constantin 324. Neuarb. Auf. von C. Hosius und G. Kruger. München.Google Scholar
Schatzmann, A. 2012. Nikarchos II: Epigrammata. Einleitung, Texte, Kommentar. Hypomnemata 188. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Scheibner, G. 1965. ‘Ein Unbekanntes Philitasfragment in der Berliner Papyrussammlung’, in Zucker, F. (ed.), Menanders Dyskolos als Zeugnis seiner Epoche. Berlin: 103–14.Google Scholar
Schissel von Fleschenberg, O. 1913. Die griechische Novelle, Rekonstruktion ihrer literarischen Form. Halle.Google Scholar
Schizzerotto, G. 1968. ‘Uguccione e l’epigrafe per il cavallo di Adriano’, Maia 20: 276–83.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. 2015. ‘Music and meaning in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe: the inset tales in their performative settings’, Phoenix 69.1/2: 79–99.Google Scholar
Schmedt, H. 2020. Antonius Diogenes, Die unglaublichen Dinge jenseits von Thule. Edition, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1887–96. Der Atticismus in seinen Hauptvertretern von Dionysius von Halikarnass bis auf den zweiten Philostratus. 5 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. and Stählin, O. 1920–6. Geschichte der griechischen Literatur ii. 2. München.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1969. ‘Hirtenhierarchie in der antiken Bukolik’, Philologus 113: 183–200.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. 1997. Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Zetemata 97. München.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. 2017. ‘The rhetoric of desire in Philostratus’ Letters’, Arethusa 50, 257–82.Google Scholar
Schönberger, O. 1989. Longos. Hirtengeschichten von Daphnis und Chloe. Darmstadt (1st ed. Berlin 1960).Google Scholar
Schröder, S. 1999. Geschichte und Theorie der Gattung Paian: eine Kritische Untersuchung mit einem Ausblick auf Behandlung und Auffassung der lyrischen Gattungen bei den alexandrinischen Philologen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Scobie, A. 1973. More Essays on the Ancient Romance and Its Heritage. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1974. ‘Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll and Lycidas’, WS 8: 20–76 (repr. in Segal, 1981, 110–66).Google Scholar
Segers, H. 2017. ‘The apple in Longus’ Lesvos: Sapphic imagery in the poetic space of Daphnis and Chloe’, in Classics@16: Seven Essays on Sappho. Center for Hellenic Studies. Washington, DC. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hlnc.essay:SegersH.The_Apple_in_Longus_Lesvos.2017Google Scholar
Sens, A. 2004. ‘Doricisms in the New and Old Posidippus’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves. Perspectives on an Epigram Collection attributed to Posidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII 309). Washington, DC: 65–83.Google Scholar
Sens, A. 2007. ‘One thing leads (back) to another’, in Bing, and Βruss, (eds.): 373–90.Google Scholar
Shear, J. 2013. ‘Choruses and tripods. The politics of the choregia in Roman Athens’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.): 389–408.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. R. R. 1984–6. ‘Homonoia in the Greek cities of the Roman Empire’, AncSoc 15–17: 229–53.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2006. ‘The new Simonides and the question of historical elegy’, AJPh 127: 327–46.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2020. Simonides. Epigrams and Elegies: Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. 2009. Aristophanes the Democrat: The Politics of Satirical Comedy during the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Sijpesteijn, P. J. 1969. ‘A new document concerning Hadrian’s visit to Egypt’, Historia 18: 107–18.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. 1974. Interaction in Poetic Imagery with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skenteri, F. 2005. Herodes Atticus Reflected in Occasional Poetry of Antonine Athens. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Small, S. G. 1951. ‘Marcus Argentarius: a poet of the Greek Anthology’, YClS 12: 65–145.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1987. ‘The imperial reliefs from the Sebasteion at Aphrodisias’, JRS 77: 88–138.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 2013. The Marble Reliefs from the Julio-Claudian Sebasteion: Aphrodisias VI. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. 2007. Greek Identity and the Athenian Past in Chariton: The Romance of Empire. ANS 9. Groningen.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. 2014. Man and Animal in Severan Rome: The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelianus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. M. 1989. The Woman and the Lyre: Women Writers in Classical Greece and Rome. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1940. ‘Some works of Philostratus the Elder’, TAPhA 71: 556–72 (repr. in Kleine Schriften ii. Hildesheim 1968: 74–90).Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H., Halliwell, S., Henderson, J. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.) 1993. Tragedy, Comedy and the Polis: Papers from the Greek Drama Conference, Nottingham, 18–20 July 1990. Bari.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 1997. ‘The theatre audience, the Demos and the Suppliants of Aeschylus’, in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford: 63–79.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1991. ‘Reading’ Greek Culture: Texts and Images, Rituals and Myths. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. J. and Walker, S. 1985. ‘The world of the Panhellenion. I. Athens and Eleusis’, JRS 75: 78–104.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. J. and Walker, S. 1986. ‘The World of the Panhellenion. II. Three Dorian Cities’, JRS 76: 88–105.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1965. Plutarch’s Historical Methods. An Analysis of the De Mulierum Virtutibus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Stadtmüller, H. 1894–1906. Anthologia Graeca epigrammatum Palatina cum Planudea. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Steinbichler, W. 1998. Die Epigramme des Dichters Straton von Sardes. Ein Beitrag zum griechischen paiderotischen Epigramm. Berlin, Bern and Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. 1982. Untersuchungen zur römischen Literatur des zweiten Jahrhunderts nach Christi Geburt. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. 1989. ‘Lyrische Dichtung im 2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.’, ANRW ii 33.1: 259–302.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 1994. ‘Who read ancient novels?’, in Tatum, J. (ed.), The Search for the Ancient Novel. Baltimore and London: 405–18.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. and Winkler, J. J. 1995. Ancient Greek Novels: The Fragments. Princeton.Google Scholar
Storey, I. C. 2014. ‘The first poets of Old Comedy’, in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Old Comedy. Oxford: 95–112.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F. 1982. ‘Dionysos at Delphi. The pediments of the sixth temple of Apollo and the religious reform in the age of Alexander’, in Barr-Sharrar, B. and Borza, E. N. (eds.), Macedonia and Greece in Late Classical and Early Hellenistic Times. Washington, DC: 205–27.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. 1996. ‘Fra “consume” e “impegno”: usi didattici della narrativa nel mondo antico’, in Pecere, and Stramaglia, (eds.): 99–166.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. 1999. Res inauditae, incredulae. Storie di fantasmi nel mondo Greco-latino. Bari.Google Scholar
Strauss Clay, J. 1996. ‘Fusing the boundaries: Apollo and Dionysos at Delphi’, Metis 11: 83–100.Google Scholar
Strazdins, E. 2022. ‘Herodes Atticus and the sanctuaries of Achaea: reinterpreting the Roman present via the Greek past’, in Kouremenos, A. (ed.), The Province of Achaea in the 2nd Century CE. London: 166–90.Google Scholar
Strazdins, E. 2023. Fashioning the Future in Roman Greece: Memory, Monuments, Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Strubbe, J. 1984–6. ‘Gründer kleinasiatischer Städte: Fiktion und Realität’, AncSoc 15–17: 253–304.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. 1993. Martial: The Unexpected Classic. A Literary and Historical Study. London and New York.Google Scholar
Swain, S. C. R. 1991. ‘The reliability of Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, ClAnt 10: 148–63.Google Scholar
Swain, S. C. R. 1996. Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. C. R., Harrison, S. J. and Elsner, J. (eds.) 2007. Severan Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1968. ‘The Ummidii’, Historia 17: 72–105 (repr. in Roman Papers ii. Oxford 1979: 659–93).Google Scholar
Szepessy, T. 1957. ‘Die Aithiopika des Heliodoros und der griechische sophistische Liebesroman’, AAntHung 5: 241–59.Google Scholar
Szepessy, T. 1976. ‘Le siège de Nisibe et la chronologie d’Héliodore’, AAntHung 24: 247–76.Google Scholar
Szepessy, T. 1978. ‘Zur Interpretation einer neu entdeckten Liebesroman’, AAntHung 26: 29–36.Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. 2013. ‘The victory of Greek Ionia in Xenophon’s Ephesiaca’, in Whitmarsh, and Thomson, (eds.): 225–42.Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. 2017. Xenophon’s Ephesiaca: A Paraliterary Love-Story from the Ancient World. ANS 22. Groningen.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1983. ‘The arguments in the Phaedo concerning the thesis that the soul is harmonia’, in Anton, J. P. and Preus, A., Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, vol. ii. Albany: 217–31 (repr. in C. C. W. Taylor, Pleasure, Mind, and Soul: Selected Papers in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford 2008: 74–90).Google Scholar
Teske, D. 1991. Der Roman des Longos als Werk der Kunst: Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Physis und Techne in Daphnis und Chloe. Münster.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1995. ‘At home in the city of Artemis. Religion in Ephesos in the literary imagination of the Roman period’, in Koestler, H. (ed.), Ephesos. Metropolis of Asia. Valley Forge (repr. in Harvard Theological Studies 2004: 81–117).Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2000. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thyresson, I. L. 1964. ‘Quatre lettres de Claude Élien inspirées par le Dyscolos de Ménandre’, Eranos 62: 7–25.Google Scholar
Tilg, S. 2010. Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. 1993. ‘Some new thoughts on Herodes Atticus’ tomb, his stadium of 143/4, and Philostratus VS 2.550’, AJA 97: 81–9.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. 1997. Herodes Attikos and the City of Athens: Patronage and Conflict under the Antonines. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tovar, A. 1971. ‘Un nuevo epigrama griego de Córdoba: Arriano de Nicomedia, Procónsul de Bética?’, in Laín Entralgo, P. (ed.), Estudios sobre la obra de Américo Castro. Madrid: 403–12.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 1990. ‘Plato’s Phaedrus in second-century Greek literature’, in Russell, 1990b: 141–73.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 2016. ‘Philostratus, Aristides and the geography of declamation’, in Poignault, and Schneider, (eds.): 197–210.Google Scholar
Treu, K. 1989. ‘Der antike Roman und sein Publikum’, in Kuch, H. (ed.), Der antike Roman. Untersuchungen zur literarischen Kommunikation und Gattungsgeschichte. Berlin: 178–97.Google Scholar
Trzaskoma, S. 2005. ‘A novelist writing “history”: Longus’ Thucydides again’, GRBS 45: 75–90.Google Scholar
Trzaskoma, S. 2010. Two Novels from Ancient Greece: Chariton’s Callirhoe and Xenophon of Ephesus’ An Ephesian Story: Anthia and Habrocomes. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Trzaskoma, S. 2018. ‘Citations of Xenophon in Chariton’, in Chew, Morgan and Trzaskoma, (eds.): 65–79.Google Scholar
Tsavari, I. 1990. Διονυσίου Ἀλεξανδρέως οἰκουμένης περιήγησις. Κριτική Εκδοσή. Ioannina.Google Scholar
Ubsdell, S. 1983. Herodotus on Human Nature: Studies in Herodotean Thought, Method and Exposition. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Vaio, J. 1971. ‘Aristophanes’ Wasps. The relevance of the final scenes’, GRBS 14: 335–51.Google Scholar
Valley, G. 1928. Longos. Daphnis och Chloe. En Herderoman, Översatt från Grekiskan av Gunnar Valley, Försedd med Teckningar av Yngve Berg. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Vamvouri, M. 1998. ‘Fiction poétique et realité historique à propos du Péan de Limenios’, Gaia 3: 37–57.Google Scholar
Vamvouri Ruffy, M. 2004. La fabrique du divin. Les Hymnes de Callimaque à la lumière des Hymnes homériques et des hymnes épigraphiques. Kernos, suppl. 14. Liège.Google Scholar
van Bremen, R. 1996. The Limits of Participation. Women and Civic Life in the Greek East in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van Groningen, Β. 1958. ‘Quelques problèmes de la poésie bucolique grecque’, Mnemosyne 11: 293–317.Google Scholar
Van Nijf, O. 1997. The Civic World of Professional Associations in the Roman East. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van Straten, F. T. 1976. ‘Daikrates’ Dream. A votive relief from Kos, and some other kat’onar dedications’, BABesch 51: 1–38.Google Scholar
Vetta, M. 1976–7. ‘Un capitolo di storia di poesia simposiale (per l’esegesi di Aristofane, “Vespe” 1222–1284)’, DArch 9–10: 243–66 (repr. in Vetta (ed.) 1983: 119–31).Google Scholar
Vetta, M. (ed.) 1983. Poesia e simposio nella Grecia antica: Guida storica e critica. Roma and Bari.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1978. Le pain et le cirque. Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, T. 2000. ‘Milesian immigrants in late Hellenistic and Roman Athens’, in Oliver, G. J. (ed.), The Epigraphy of Death. Liverpool: 81–110.Google Scholar
Vian, F. 2001. ‘Echoes and imitations of Apollonius in late Greek epic’, in Papanghelis, A. D. and Rengakos, T. (eds.), A Companion to Apollonius Rhodius. Leiden 387–411.Google Scholar
Vian, F. 1986. ‘L’épopée grecque de Quintus de Smyrne à Nonnos de Panopolis’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé: 333–43.Google Scholar
Vinchesi, M. A. 1988. ‘L’epitafio di Adriano per il cavallo Boristene (CE 1522 Bücheler)’, in Tandoi, V. (ed.), Disiecti membra poetae. Studi di poesia latina in frammenti. Foggia: 180–93.Google Scholar
Vogliano, A. and Cumont, F. 1933. ‘La grande iscrizione Bacchica del Metropolitan Museum / La grande inscription Bachique du Metropolitan Museum’, AJA 37: 215–70.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1992. ‘Erōs and the eye in the Love-letters of Philostratus’, PCPhS 38: 132–48.Google Scholar
Waltz, P., Soury, G., Irigoin, J. and Laurens, P. 1974. Anthologie grecque. Anthologie palatine, t. VIII, livre IX, épigr. 359–827. Paris.Google Scholar
Warden, P. and Bagnall, R. 1988. ‘The forty thousand citizens of Ephesus’, CPh 83: 220–3.Google Scholar
Wartenberg, U. 1997. ‘Papyri of Apollonius Rhodius nos. 4414–17, 4419’, in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 64. London.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2008. Demons and Dancers: Performance in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2013. ‘Mime and romance’, in Whitmarsh, T. and Thomson, S. (eds.), The Romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge: 285–99.Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. 1934. Marcellus von Side als Arzt und die Koiranides des Hermes Trismegistos. Philologus Suppl. 27.2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1978. ‘Die griechische Dichterinnen der Kaiserzeit’, in Beck, H. G., Kambylis, A. and Moraux, P. (eds.), Kyklos: Griechisches und Byzantinisches: Rudolf Keydell zum 90. Geburtstag. Berlin: 106–8.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2013. Hellenica. Volume III: Philosophy, Music and Metre, Literary Byways, Varia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitby, J. M. 2007. ‘The Cynegetica attributed to Oppian’, in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 125–34.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2004. ‘The Cretan lyre paradox: Mesomedes, Hadrian and the poetics of patronage’, in Borg, (ed.): 377–402.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2005a. ‘The lexicon of love: Longus and Philetas GRAMMATIKOS’, JHS 125: 145–8.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (ed.) 2008b. The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2011. Narrative and Identity in the Greek Novel: Returning Romance Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013. Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von 1880. Aus Kydathen. Philologische Untersuchungen i. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von 1906. Textgeschichte der griechischen Bukoliker. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von 1928. Marcellus von Side. Sitzungsb. der Preuss. Ak. Wiss., Phil. Hist. Kl. 1982: 3–30 (repr. in Kleine Schriften ii. ed. R. Pfeiffer et al., Berlin 1941 (repr. 1960): 192–228).Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von 1889. ‘Commentariolum Grammaticum III’, Index scholarum publice et privatim in Academia Georgia Augusta per semester aestivum. Göttingen: 3–30 (repr. in Kleine Schriften iv ed. K. Latte, Berlin 1962: 619–59).Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (ed.) 2007. The Greek Theatre and Festivals. Documentary Studies. Oxford Studies in Ancient Documents. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1982. ‘The mendacity of Calasiris and the narrative strategy of Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, YClS 27: 93–158.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire. The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. London and New York.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. 1988. Stadt und Fest im kaiserzeitlichen Kleinasien: Studien zu einer agonistischen Stiftung aus Oinoanda. München.Google Scholar
Wouters, A. 1994. ‘Longus, Daphnis et Chloé: le prooemion et les histoires enchâssées, à la lumière de la critique récente’, LEC 62: 131–67.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. C. 1968. ‘Author’s variants in the manuscript tradition of Longus’, PCPhS 194: 65–74.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. C. 1971. ‘Second thoughts on Longus’ second thoughts’, PCPhS 197: 91–107.Google Scholar
Ypsilanti, M. 2018. The Epigrams of Crinagoras of Mytilene: Introduction, Text, Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Zanetto, G. 2001. ‘Iambic Models in Aristophanic Comedy’, in Cavarzere, A., Barchiesi, A. and Aloni, A. (eds.), Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham: 65–76.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1995. Die Maske des Sokrates. Das Bild des Intellektuellen in der antiken Kunst. München (transl. in English as The Mask of Socrates. Berkeley and Los Angeles 1997).Google Scholar
Ziebarth, E. 1913. Aus der antiken Schule. Sammlung griechischer Texte auf Papyrus, Holztafeln, Ostraka, ausgewählt und erklärt, 2nd ed. Bonn.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. 1993. ‘Aristophanes und die Intellektuellen’, in Bremer, and Handley, (eds.): 255–86.Google Scholar