Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Equality for Inegalitarians
  • Cited by 30
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9780511841859
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841859
Subjects:
Political Theory, Politics and International Relations, Philosophy, Political Philosophy
Information

Book description

This book offers a new and compelling account of distributive justice and its relation to choice. Unlike luck egalitarians, who treat unchosen differences in people's circumstances as sources of unjust inequality to be overcome, Sher views such differences as pervasive and unavoidable features of the human situation. Appealing to an original account of what makes us moral equals, he argues that our interest in successfully negotiating life's ever-shifting contingencies is more basic than our interest in achieving any more specific goals. He argues, also, that the state's obligation to promote this interest supports a principled version of the view that what matters about resources, opportunity, and other secondary goods is only that each person have enough. The book opens up a variety of new questions, and offers a distinctive new perspective for scholars of political theory and political philosophy, and for those interested in distributive justice and luck egalitarianism.

Reviews

‘At once a magisterial overview of the field and a deeply original and important contribution, this is a must-read for anyone interested in contemporary debates over justice and egalitarianism. Sher's book promises to change the contours of those debates in lasting ways.'

David McCabe - Colgate University, New York

‘[Sher] abandons the decades-long preoccupation with Rawlsianism and focuses exclusively on luck egalitarianism … the book is refreshing. … rich and sophisticated …’

Shlomi Segall Source: The Philosophical Quarterly

'The book is admirably concise. Problems with opposing views are illustrated with humorous, carefully chosen examples. The critical chapters (2-4) are carefully executed and ultimately persuasive. The early positive chapters (5-7) engage with some of the deepest questions in practical philosophy; they are engaging and thought-provoking. … It is no exaggeration to say that it is required reading for anyone interested in luck egalitarianism or sufficientism about distributive justice.'

Jason Raibley - Murphy Institute, Tulane University and California State University, Long Beach

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Bibliography
Ackerman, Bruce. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980 Google Scholar.
Anderson, Elizabeth. “What Is the Point of Equality?,” Ethics 109 (1999 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 287–337.
Anderson, Elizabeth “How Should Egalitarians Cope with Market Risks?,” Theoretical Inquiries into Law 9 (2008 Google Scholar): 239–70.
Arneson, Richard. “Distributive Ethics and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is not Enough,” in Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. Edited by Kaufman, Alexander, pp. 17–43. New York: Routledge, 2006 Google Scholar.
Arneson, Richard “Egalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor,” Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (1997 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 327–50.
Arneson, Richard “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare,” Philosophical Studies 56 (1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 77–93.
Arneson, Richard “Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism,” Ethics, 110 (2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 339–49.
Arneson, Richard “Luck Egalitarianism: An Interpretation and Defense,” Philosophical Topics 32 (2004 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 1–20.
Arneson, Richard “What, if Anything, Renders All Humans Morally Equal?,” in Singer and His Critics. Edited by Jamieson, Dale, pp. 103–28. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999 Google Scholar.
Banfield, Edward. The Unheavenly City. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1968 Google Scholar.
Barry, Nicholas. “Defending Luck Egalitarianism,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 89–107.
Bratman, Michael. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987 Google Scholar.
Brighouse, Harry, and Swift, Adam. “Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods,” Ethics 116 (2006 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 471–97.
Carens, Joseph. Equality, Moral Incentives, and the Market: An Essay in Utopian Politico-Economic Theory. University of Chicago Press, 1981 Google Scholar.
Carter, Ian. “Basic Equality and the Site of Egalitarian Justice,” Economics and Philosophy 29 (2013 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 21–41.
Carter, Ian “Respect and the Basis of Equality,” Ethics 121 (2011 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 538–71.
Casal, Paula. “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough,” Ethics 117 (2007 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 296–326.
Chalmers, David. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996 Google Scholar.
Cohen, Gerald. “Luck and Equality: A Reply to Hurley,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2006 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 439–46.
Cohen, Gerald “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics 99 (1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 906–47.
Cohen, GeraldRescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Dworkin, Ronald. “Equality, Luck and Hierarchy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 190–98.
Dworkin, Ronald “In Defense of Equality,” Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1983 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 24–40.
Dworkin, RonaldJustice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011 Google Scholar.
Dworkin, RonaldA Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985 Google Scholar.
Dworkin, RonaldSovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000 Google Scholar.
Dworkin, Ronald “Sovereign Virtue Revisited,” Ethics 113 (2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 106–43.
Dworkin, RonaldTaking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977 Google Scholar.
Dworkin, Ronald “What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981 Google Scholar): 185–246.
Dworkin, Ronald “What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981 Google Scholar): 283–345.
Feinberg, Joel. Doing and Deserving. Princeton University Press, 1979 Google Scholar.
Fleurbaey, Marc. “Egalitarian Opportunities,” Law and Philosophy 20 (2001 Google Scholar): 499–530.
Fleurbaey, Marc “Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?,” Economics and Philosophy 11 (2005 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 25–55.
Frankfurt, Harry. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 829–39.
Frankfurt, HarryThe Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University Press, 1988 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Gans, Herbert. The War against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy. New York: Basic Books, 1995 Google Scholar.
Gutmann, Amy. Democratic Education. Princeton University Press, 1987 Google Scholar.
Harrington, Michael. The Other America. New York: Macmillan, 1962 Google Scholar.
Heyd, David, and Miller, G. Franklin. “Life Plans: Do They Give Meaning to Our Lives?,” The Monist 93 (2010 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 17–37.
Holton, Richard. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford University Press, 2009 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Hurley, Susan. Justice, Luck, and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003 Google Scholar.
Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press, 2012 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovik, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, 1982 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Kauppinen, Anntui. “Meaningfulness and Time,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2012 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 239–65.
Keller, Simon. “Welfare as Success,” Nous 43 (2009 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 656–83.
Knight, Carl. Luck Egalitarianism. University of Edinburgh Press, 2009 Google Scholar.
Knight, Carl “The Metaphysical Case for Luck Egalitarianism,” Social Theory and Practice 32 (2006 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 173–89.
Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge University Press, 1996 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Korsgaard, ChristineSelf-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University Press, 2009 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Korsgaard, ChristineThe Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press, 1996 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Larmore, Charles. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1987 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Larmore, Charles “The Idea of a Life Plan,” Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1999 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 96–112.
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. “Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility,” Ethics 111 (2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 548–79.
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper “Justice and Bad Luck,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009 Google Scholar), online, n.p.
Lloyd Thomas, D. A. “Equality within the Limits of Reason Alone,” Mind 88 (1979 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 538–53.
Markovits, Daniel. “Luck Egalitarianism and Political Solidarity,” Theoretical Inquiries into Law 9 (2008 Google Scholar): 271–308.
McKerlie, Dennis. “Equality and Time,” Ethics 99 (1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 475–91.
McMahan, Jeff. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford University Press, 2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Miller, David. Market, State, and Community: Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism. Oxford University Press, 1989 Google Scholar.
Nagel, Thomas. Equality and Partiality. Oxford University Press, 1991 Google Scholar.
Nagel, ThomasThe View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press, 1986 Google Scholar.
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974 Google Scholar.
Nussbaum, Martha. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Nussbaum, MarthaWomen and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Olsaretti, Serena, ed. Justice and Desert. Oxford University Press, 2003 Google Scholar.
Olsaretti, Serena, Liberty, Desert, and the Market. Cambridge University Press, 2004 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Otsuka, Michael. “Luck, Insurance, and Equality,” Ethics 113 (2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 40–54.
Parfit, Derek. “Equality or Priority?,” in The Idea of Equality. Edited by Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew, pp. 81–125. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000 Google Scholar.
Pettit, Phillip. “Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2008 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 206–20.
Raibly, Jason R. “Welfare over Time and the Case for Holism,” Philosophical Papers 41 (2012 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 239–65.
Rakowski, Eric. Equal Justice. Oxford University Press, 1991 Google Scholar.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971 Google Scholar.
Rawls, John “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980,” Journal of Philosophy 77 Google Scholar (1980): 515–72.
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1986 Google Scholar.
Riley, Jonathan. “Justice under Capitalism,” in Markets and Justice: Nomos XXXI. Edited by Chapman, J. W. and Pennock, J. Roland, pp. 122–62. New York University Press, 1989 Google Scholar.
Roemer, John. “A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993 Google Scholar): 146–66.
Roemer, John “Equality and Responsibility,” The Boston Review, 20 (1995 Google Scholar): 3–16.
Roemer, JohnEquality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998 Google Scholar.
Sadurski, Wojchek. Giving Desert Its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Sandbu, Martin. “On Dworkin's Brute-Luck – Option-Luck Distinction and the Consistency of Brute-Luck Egalitarianism,” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 3 (2004 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 283–312.
Scheffler, Samuel. Equality and Tradition. Oxford University Press, 2010 Google Scholar.
Scheffler, Samuel “What Is Egalitarianism?,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 5–39.
Segall, Shlomi. “In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism,” Social Theory and Practice 33 (2007 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 177–98.
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books, 1999 Google Scholar.
Sen, Amartya “Equality of What?,” in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Edited by McMurrin, Sterling, pp. 195–220. Cambridge University Press, 1980 Google Scholar.
Sen, AmartyaInequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press, 1992 Google Scholar.
Sher, George. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1997 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Sher, GeorgeDesert. Princeton University Press, 1987 Google Scholar.
Sher, George “Talents and Choices,” Nous 46 (2012 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 375–86.
Sher, GeorgeWho Knew? Responsibility without Awareness. Oxford University Press, 2009 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. New York: Avon Books, 1975 Google Scholar.
Singer, PeterPractical Ethics, Third Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2011 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Smilansky, Saul. “Egalitarian Justice and the Importance of the Free Will Problem,” Philosophia 25 (1997 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 153–61.
Sytsma, Justin, and Machery, Edouard. “The Two Sources of Moral Standing,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2012 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 303–24.
Tan, Kok-Chor. “A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism,” Journal of Philosophy 105 (2008 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 665–90.
Temkin, Larry. “Egalitarianism Defended,” Ethics 110 (2000 Google Scholar): 339–49.
Vallentyne, Peter. “Brute Luck and Responsibility,” Philosophy, Politics, and Economics 7 (2008 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 57–80.
Vallentyne, Peter “Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities,” Ethics 112 (2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 529–57.
Velleman, J. David. Practical Reflection. Princeton University Press, 1989 Google Scholar.
Velleman, J. DavidThe Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press, 2000 Google Scholar.
Voight, Kristin. “The Harshness Objection: Is Luck Egalitarianism Too Harsh on the Victims of Option Luck?,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2007 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 389–407.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Basic Equality.” New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, 107 (2009 Google Scholar): online.
Williams, Bernard. “The Idea of Equality,” in Equality: Selected Readings. Edited by Pojman, Louis and Westmoreland, Robert, pp. 91–104. Oxford University Press, 1997 Google Scholar.
Williams, BernardMoral Luck. Cambridge University Press, 1981 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Wilson, William Julius. The Truly Disadvantaged. University of Chicago Press, 1987 Google Scholar.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.