Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:49:58.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2024

Jan Maximilian Robitzsch
Jan Maximilian Robitzsch
Affiliation:
Universität Greifswald
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Epicurean Justice
Nature, Agreement, and Virtue
 , pp. 175 - 193
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walter (eds.) 1951–2. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th ed., 3 vols., Berlin: Weidmannsche BuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad, and Gerson, Lloyd (eds.) 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings, 2nd ed., Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, Mary R., and Fant, Maureen B. (eds.) 2016. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome: A Sourcebook in Translation, 4th ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony, and Sedley, David (eds.) 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols., New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bywater, John (ed.) 1894. Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea, Oxford: ClarendonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Werner (ed.) 2010 [1957]. Aristotelis Metaphysica, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Luigi (ed.) 2008 [1949]. Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de interpretatione, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. Aristotle: Politics, Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1957. Aristotelis Politica, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1964. Aristotelis Analytica priora et posteria, Oxford: ClarendonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 2009 [1950]. Aristotelis Physica, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (ed.) 2001. Cicero: On Moral Ends, New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, Walter (ed.) 2005 [1913]. Cicero: On Duties, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Rackham, Harris (ed.) 1942. Cicero: On the Orator Book 3, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Rackham, Harris (ed.) 1951. Cicero: On the Nature of the Gods Academics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) 1998. M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael (ed.) 1994. M. Tulli Ciceronis De officiis, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Puglia, Enzo (ed.) 1988. Aporie testuali ed esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (ed.) 1999. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus, Toronto: University of Toronto PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, Tiziano (ed.) 2013. Diogenes Laeritus: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, R. D. (ed.) 2005 [1931]. Diogenes Laeritus: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Hammerstaedt, Jürgen, and Smith, Martin Ferguson (eds.) 2014. The Epicurean Inscription of Diogenes of Oinoanda: Ten Years of Discoveries and Research, Bonn: HabeltGoogle Scholar
Smith, Martin Ferguson (ed.) 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Arrighetti, Graziano (ed.) 1973. Epicuro: Opere, 2nd ed., Turin: EinaudiGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Cyril (ed.) 1979 [1926]. Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Westpoint: Hyperion PressGoogle Scholar
Bignone, Ettore (ed.) 1964 [1920]. Epicuro: Opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita, Rome: “L’Erma” di BretschneiderGoogle Scholar
Bollack, Jean (ed.) 1975. La pensée du plaisir: Épicure: Textes moraux, commentaires, Paris: Éditions de MinuitGoogle Scholar
Diano, Carlo (ed.) 1946. Ethica Epicuri, Florence: SansoniGoogle Scholar
Hessler, Jan Erik (ed.) 2014. Epikur: Brief an Menoikeus, Basel: SchwabeGoogle Scholar
Usener, Hermann (ed.) 1887. Epicurea, Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Verde, Francesco (ed.) 2010. Epicuro: Epistola a Erodoto, Rome: CarocciGoogle Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1995. “The Early Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book,” Cronache ercolanesi 25: 5–109Google Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1997. “The Later Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book,” Cronache ercolanesi 27: 5–82Google Scholar
Leone, Giuliana (ed.) 2012. Epicuro: Sulla natura, libro II, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Obbink, Dirk, and Schorn, Stefan 2011. “5077. Epicurus (et al.), Epistulae ad familiares,” Oxyrhynchus Papyri 76: 37–50Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walter (eds.) 1951–2. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th ed., 3 vols., Berlin: Weidmannsche BuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad, and Gerson, Lloyd (eds.) 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings, 2nd ed., Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, Mary R., and Fant, Maureen B. (eds.) 2016. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome: A Sourcebook in Translation, 4th ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony, and Sedley, David (eds.) 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols., New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bywater, John (ed.) 1894. Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea, Oxford: ClarendonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Werner (ed.) 2010 [1957]. Aristotelis Metaphysica, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Luigi (ed.) 2008 [1949]. Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de interpretatione, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. Aristotle: Politics, Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1957. Aristotelis Politica, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1964. Aristotelis Analytica priora et posteria, Oxford: ClarendonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 2009 [1950]. Aristotelis Physica, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (ed.) 2001. Cicero: On Moral Ends, New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, Walter (ed.) 2005 [1913]. Cicero: On Duties, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Rackham, Harris (ed.) 1942. Cicero: On the Orator Book 3, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Rackham, Harris (ed.) 1951. Cicero: On the Nature of the Gods Academics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) 1998. M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael (ed.) 1994. M. Tulli Ciceronis De officiis, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Puglia, Enzo (ed.) 1988. Aporie testuali ed esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (ed.) 1999. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus, Toronto: University of Toronto PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, Tiziano (ed.) 2013. Diogenes Laeritus: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, R. D. (ed.) 2005 [1931]. Diogenes Laeritus: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Hammerstaedt, Jürgen, and Smith, Martin Ferguson (eds.) 2014. The Epicurean Inscription of Diogenes of Oinoanda: Ten Years of Discoveries and Research, Bonn: HabeltGoogle Scholar
Smith, Martin Ferguson (ed.) 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Arrighetti, Graziano (ed.) 1973. Epicuro: Opere, 2nd ed., Turin: EinaudiGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Cyril (ed.) 1979 [1926]. Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Westpoint: Hyperion PressGoogle Scholar
Bignone, Ettore (ed.) 1964 [1920]. Epicuro: Opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita, Rome: “L’Erma” di BretschneiderGoogle Scholar
Bollack, Jean (ed.) 1975. La pensée du plaisir: Épicure: Textes moraux, commentaires, Paris: Éditions de MinuitGoogle Scholar
Diano, Carlo (ed.) 1946. Ethica Epicuri, Florence: SansoniGoogle Scholar
Hessler, Jan Erik (ed.) 2014. Epikur: Brief an Menoikeus, Basel: SchwabeGoogle Scholar
Usener, Hermann (ed.) 1887. Epicurea, Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Verde, Francesco (ed.) 2010. Epicuro: Epistola a Erodoto, Rome: CarocciGoogle Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1995. “The Early Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book,” Cronache ercolanesi 25: 5–109Google Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1997. “The Later Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book,” Cronache ercolanesi 27: 5–82Google Scholar
Leone, Giuliana (ed.) 2012. Epicuro: Sulla natura, libro II, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Obbink, Dirk, and Schorn, Stefan 2011. “5077. Epicurus (et al.), Epistulae ad familiares,” Oxyrhynchus Papyri 76: 37–50Google Scholar
Arrighetti, Graziano (ed.) 1973. Epicuro: Opere, 2nd ed., Turin: EinaudiGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Cyril (ed.) 1979 [1926]. Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Westpoint: Hyperion PressGoogle Scholar
Bignone, Ettore (ed.) 1964 [1920]. Epicuro: Opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita, Rome: “L’Erma” di BretschneiderGoogle Scholar
Bollack, Jean (ed.) 1975. La pensée du plaisir: Épicure: Textes moraux, commentaires, Paris: Éditions de MinuitGoogle Scholar
Diano, Carlo (ed.) 1946. Ethica Epicuri, Florence: SansoniGoogle Scholar
Hessler, Jan Erik (ed.) 2014. Epikur: Brief an Menoikeus, Basel: SchwabeGoogle Scholar
Usener, Hermann (ed.) 1887. Epicurea, Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Verde, Francesco (ed.) 2010. Epicuro: Epistola a Erodoto, Rome: CarocciGoogle Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1995. “The Early Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book,” Cronache ercolanesi 25: 5–109Google Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1997. “The Later Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book,” Cronache ercolanesi 27: 5–82Google Scholar
Leone, Giuliana (ed.) 2012. Epicuro: Sulla natura, libro II, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Obbink, Dirk, and Schorn, Stefan 2011. “5077. Epicurus (et al.), Epistulae ad familiares,” Oxyrhynchus Papyri 76: 37–50Google Scholar
Helm, Rudolf (ed.) 1956. Die Chronik des Hieronymus. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. M., and Robinson, O. F. (eds.) 1988. The Institutes of Gaius, London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Auricchio, Francesca Longo (ed.) 1988. Ermarco: Frammenti, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Krohn, Karl (ed.) 1921. Der Epikureer Hermarchos, Berlin: Weidmannsche BuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Godley, A. D. (ed.) 2000 [1938]. Herodotus: The Persians Wars, Books III–IV [ = Histories], Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Illaria (ed.) 2009. Hierocles: Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts, Atlanta: Society of Biblical LiteratureGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Cyril (trans.) 1936 [1910]. Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Cyril (ed.) 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 3 vols., Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Smith, Martin Ferguson (trans.) 1969. Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Angeli, Anna (ed.) 1988. Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola (PHerc. 1005), Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David, and McOsker, Michael (eds.) 2020. Philodemus: On Anger, Atlanta: Society of Biblical LiteratureGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, Phillip Howard, and De Lacy, Estelle Allen (eds.) 1978. Philodemus: On Methods of Inference, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Daniel (ed.) 2007. Philodème de Gadara: Sur la musique: Livre IV, 2 vols., Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar
Diels, Hermann (ed.) 1916. Philodemos, Über die Götter, Erstes Buch, Berlin: Verlag der königlichen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
Diels, Hermann (ed.) 1917. Philodemos, Über die Götter, Drittes Buch, 2 vols., Berlin: Verlag der königlichen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, Tiziano (ed.) 1982. Filodemo: Il buon re secondo Omero, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Henry, W. Benjamin (ed.) 2009. Philodemus: On Death, Atlanta: Society of Biblical LiteratureGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, Harry (trans.) 1920. The Rhetorica of Philodemus, New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Indelli, Giovanni, and Tsouna-McKirahan, Voula (eds.) 1995. [Philodemus] [On Choices and Avoidances], Naples: Bibliopolis [= PHerc 1251]Google Scholar
Janko, Richard (ed.) 2000. Philodemus: On Poems, Book 1, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Janko, Richard (ed.) 2011. Philodemus: On Poems, Book 3–4, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Janko, Richard (ed.) 2020. Philodemus: On Poems, Book 2, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David, et al. (eds.) 1998. Philodemus: On Frank Criticism, Atlanta: Society of Biblical LiteratureGoogle Scholar
Mangoni, Cecilia (ed.) 1993. Filodemo: Il quinto libro della Poetica (PHerc. 1425 e 1538), Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Monnet, Annick 1996. “[Philodème, Sur les sensations] Pherc. 19/698,” Cronache ercolanesi 26: 27–126Google Scholar
Obbink, Dirk (ed.) 1996. Philodemus: On Piety, Part 1, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Sudhaus, Siegfried (ed.) 1892. Philodemi Volumina rhetorica, 2 vols., Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, Voula (ed.) 2012. Philodemus: On Property Management, Atlanta: Society of Biblical LiteratureGoogle Scholar
Burnet, John (ed.) 1900–7. Platonis Opera, 5 vols., Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John (ed.) 1997. Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Eigler, Günther (ed.) 2005 [1971]. Platon: Werke, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Cherniss, Harold (ed.) 1976. Plutarch’s Moralia Moralia XIII, Part II, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Einarson, Benedict, and De Lacy, Phillip (eds.) 1967. Plutarch’s Moralia XIV, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Minar, Edwin L., Jr., et al. (eds.) 1961. Plutarch’s Moralia IX, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Bernadotte (ed.) 1918. Plutarch’s Lives VI, London: William HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Indelli, Giovanni (ed.) 1978. Polistrato: Sul disprezzo irrazionale delle opinioni popolari, Naples: BibliopolisGoogle Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean, and Patillon, Michel (eds.) 1979. Porphyre: De l’abstinence, 3 vols., Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gillian (trans.) 2000. Porphyry: On Abstinence of Killing Animals, London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Hummere, Richard M. (ed.) 1953. Seneca: Ad Lucilium epistulae morales, 3 vols., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Bury, R. G. (ed.) 1936. Against the Physicists Against the Ethicists [= Against the Mathematicians IX–XI], Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Angeli, Anna, and Colaizzo, Maria (eds.) 1979. “I frammenti di Zenone Sidonio,” Cronache ercolanesi 9: 47–133Google Scholar
Alberti, Antonina 1995. “The Epicurean Theory of Law and Justice,” in Laks, André, and Schofield, Malcom (eds.), Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy – Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–212Google Scholar
Alberti, Antonina 1996. “Polistratos e il realismo etico epicureo,” in Giannantoni, Gabriele, and Gigante, Marcelo (eds.), Epicureismo greco e romano, 2 vols., Naples: Bibliopolis, vol. II, 527–47Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe 1997. “Lucretius and the Epicurean Other: On the Philosophical Background of DRN v.1011–1027,” in Algra, Keimpe, et al. (eds.), Lucretius and His Intellectual Background, Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of the Sciences, 141–50Google Scholar
Annas, Julia 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia 1992. Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia 1993a. The Morality of Happiness, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia 1993b. “Epicurus on Agency,” in Brunschwig, Jacques, and Nussbaum, Martha (eds.) Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, New York: Cambridge University Press, 53–71Google Scholar
Annas, Julia 2005. “Virtue Ethics: What Kind of Naturalism,” in Gardiner, Stephen (ed.) Virtue Ethics, Old and New, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 11–29Google Scholar
Annas, Julia 2016 [2002]. “Democritus and Eudaimonism,” in Graham, Daniel, and Caston, Victor (eds.) Presocratic Philosophy: Essay in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, London: Routledge, 169–82Google Scholar
Aoiz, Javier, and Boeri, Marcelo D. 2023. Theory and Practice in Epicurean Political Philosophy, London: BloomsburyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenson, Kelly 2016. “Epicureans on Marriage as Sexual Therapy,” Polis 33: 291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenson, Kelly 2023. “Ancient Women Epicureans and Their Anti-Hedonist Critics,” in O’Reilly, Katharine, and Pellò, Caterinà (eds.) Ancient Women Philosophers: Recovered Ideas and New Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, John 1997. “Epicurean Justice,” Phronesis 42, no. 3: 324–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrighetti, Graziano 1952. “Sul valore di ΕΠΙΛΟΓΙΖΟΜΑΙ, ΕΠΙΛΟΓΙΣΜΟΣ, ΕΠΙΛΟΓΙΣΙΣ nel sistema epicureo,” Parola del passato 7: 119–44Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 1984. Epicurus’ Scientific Method, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 1991. “Philodemus’s Poetic Theory and ‘On the Good King According to Homer,’” Classical Antiquity 10, no. 1: 1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 2001. “Basic Education in Epicureanism,” in Too, Yun Lee (ed.) Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Leiden: Brill, 209–39Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 2008. “Lucretius’ New World Order: Making a Pact with Nature,” Classical Quarterly 58, no. 1: 141–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 2010 [1999]. “Epicurean Epistemology,” in Algra, Keimpe, et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 260–94Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 2010 [2009]. “Epicurean Empiricism,” in Warren, James (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, New York: Cambridge University Press, 84–104Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth 2020. “Psychology,” in Mitsis, Phillip (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–220Google Scholar
Atherton, Catherine 2009 [2005]. “Lucretius on What Language Is Not,” in Frede, Dorothea, and Inwood, Brad (eds.) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–38Google Scholar
Austin, John 1998 [1832]. The Providence of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence, Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Cyril 1964 [1928]. The Greek Atomists and Epicurus: A Study, New York: Russell and RussellGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Frederik 2016. Epicurean Meteorology: Sources, Method, and Organization, Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benferhat, Yasmina 2005. Cives epicurei: Les épicuriens et l’idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave, Brussels: Éditions LatomusGoogle Scholar
Beresford, Adam 2013. “Fangs, Feathers, & Fairness: Protagoras on the Origins of Right and Wrong,” in van Obhuijsen, Johannes M., et al. (eds.) Protagoras of Abdera: The Man, His Measure, Leiden: Brill, 139–62Google Scholar
Besnier, Bernard 1994. “Épicure et la definition,” in Jerphagnon, Lucien, et al. (eds.) Ainsi parlaient les anciens, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 117–30Google Scholar
Betegh, Gabor 2006. “Epicurus’ Argument for Atomism,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 261–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard 1994. “Sextus ‘Against the Ethicists: Scepticism, Relativism, or Both?,’” Apeiron 27, no. 2: 123–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian 2002. “Natural Law Theory: The Modern Tradition,” in Coleman, Jules, and Shapiro, Scott (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61–103.Google Scholar
Blickman, Daniel 1989. “Lucretius, Epicurus, and Prehistory,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 92: 157–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, Susanne 2006. “Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy,” in Reis, Burkhard, and Haffmanns, Stella (eds.) The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–29Google Scholar
Boyancé, Pierre 1963. Lucrèce et l’Épicurisme, Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
Brittain, Charles 2005. “Common Sense: Concepts, Definition and Meaning in and out of the Stoa,” Frede, Dorothea, and Inwood, Brad (eds.) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, New York: Cambridge University Press, 164–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Eric 2002. “Epicurus on the Value of Friendship (‘Sententia Vaticana’ 23),” Classical Philology 97, no. 1: 68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Eric 2010 [2009]. “Politics and Society,” in Warren, James (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, New York: Cambridge University Press, 179–96Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques 1986. “The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism,” in Schofield, Malcom, and Striker, Gisela (eds.) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–44Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon 2002a. “Lucretius 5.1011–27: The Origins of Justice and the Prisoner’s Dilemma,” Leeds International Classical Studies 1: https://web.archive.org/web/20141201223704/http://lics.leeds.ac.uk/2002/200203.pdfGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Gordon 2002b. “Lucretius and the Memes of Prehistory,” Leeds International Classical Studies Discussion Paper 1: https://web.archive.org/web/20141129231755/http://lics.leeds.ac.uk/discussion/2002dp1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Gordon 2003. Lucretius on Creation and Evolution, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Gordon 2008. “‘And bright was the flame of their friendship’ (Empedocles B130): Humans, Animals, Justice, and Friendship in Lucretius and Empedocles,” Leeds International Classical Studies 7: https://web.archive.org/web/20141201221416/http://lics.leeds.ac.uk/2008/200804.pdfGoogle Scholar
Canfora, Luciano, and Stringer, Julian 2007. “Epicureans in Revolt?,” in Canfora, Luciano (ed.) Julius Caesar: The People’s Dictator, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Thomas 2021. “Keeping the Friend in Epicurean Friendship,” Apeiron 54, no. 3: 385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castner, Catherine J. 1991. Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D., Frankfurt: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
Clay, Diskin 1998. Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of the Epicurean School, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Thomas 1990 [1967]. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology, Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules, and Leiter, Brian 1996. “Legal Positivism,” in Patterson, Dennis (ed.) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 241–60Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, et al. 1992. “Towards Fin de Siècle Ethics: Some Trends,” Philosophical Review 101, no. 1: 115–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, Phillip 1958. “Epicurean Epilogismos,” American Journal of Philology 79, no. 2: 179–83Google Scholar
Delattre, Daniel 2003. “Les figures du sage et du philosophe au travers de quatres livres étiques de Philodème,” Cronache ercolanesi 33: 229–41Google Scholar
Denyer, Nicholas 1983. “The Origins of Justice,” in Gigante, Marcelo (ed.) ΣΥΖΗΤHΣΙΣ: Studi sull’ Epicureism greco e romano, Naples: Gaetano Macchiaroli, 133–52Google Scholar
De Sanctis, Dino 2010. “φρόνησις e φρονίμοι nel giardino,” Cronache ercolanesi 40: 75–86Google Scholar
Detel, Wolfgang 1975. “Αἴσθησις und Λογισμός: Zwei Probleme der epikureischen Methodologie,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57, no. 1: 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, Norman 1954. Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Diaco, Sara 2022. “Epicureans and the City’s Laws,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 104, no. 2: 312–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierauer, Urs 1977. Tier und Mensch im Denken der Antike, Amsterdam: GrünerGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne 1992. The Roman Family, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowell, J. L. 2013. “Ethical Naturalism,” in LaFollette, Hugh (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 3532–42Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew R. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Henry 2009. Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa, Berlin: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, Michael 1994. “Epikur – Die Schule Epikurs – Lukrez,” in Flashar, Helmut (ed.) Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. IV.1, Basel: Schwabe, 29–490Google Scholar
Erler, Michael 2020. Epicurus: An Introduction to His Practical Ethics and Politics, Basel: SchwabeGoogle Scholar
Essler, Holger 2016. “Zusammenhang bei Einzelsätzen: Zum assoziativen Aufbau der epikureischen κύριαι δόξαι,” in Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, et al. (eds.) Philosophus Orator: Rhetorische Strategien und Strukturen in philosophischer Literatur, Basel: Schwabe, 145–60Google Scholar
Evans, Matthew 2004. “Can Epicureans Be Friends?,” Ancient Philosophy 24, no. 2: 407–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, Cynthia 1988. The Origins of Democratic Thinking: The Invention of Politics in Classical Athens, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, Benjamin 1953. “Second Thoughts on Epicurus,” Science & Society 17, no. 4: 326–39Google Scholar
Fine, Gail 2014. The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Jeffrey 2011. “Not All Politicians Are Sisyphus: What Roman Epicureans Were Taught about Politics,” in Fish, Jeffrey, and Sanders, Kirk (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Jeffrey 2018. “Some Critical Themes in Philodemus’ On the Good King According to Homer,” in Klooster, Jacqueline, and van den Berg, Baukje (eds.) Homer and the Good Ruler in Antiquity and Beyond, Leiden: Brill, 141–56Google Scholar
Fish, Jeffrey, and Sanders, Kirk (eds.) 2011. Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Tony 2018. How to Live Well: Epicurus as a Guide to Contemporary Social Reform, Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Kilian 2016. Dionysios von Alexandria De Natura (πέρι φύσεως): Übersetzung, Kommentar und Würdigung, Turnhout: BrepolsGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Don 1989. “Lucretius and Politics,” in Griffin, Miriam, and Barnes, Jonathan (eds.) Philosophia Tolgata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, Oxford: Clarendon, 120–50Google Scholar
Furley, David 1978. “Lucretius the Epicurean,” Entretiens Hardt 24: 1–27Google Scholar
Furley, David 1993. “Epicurus and Democritus on Sensible Qualities,” in Brunschwig, Jacques, and Nussbaum, Martha (eds.) Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, New York: Cambridge University Press, 72–94Google Scholar
Gallo, Italo 1985. “Ermarco e la polemica epicurea contro Empedocle,” in Cosenza, Paolo (ed.) Esistenza e destino nel pensiero greco arcaico, Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 33–50Google Scholar
Garbo, Guido 1936. “Società et stato nella concezione di Epicuro,” Atene e Roma 3, no. 4: 243–62Google Scholar
Gatz, Bodo 1967. Weltalter, Goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen, Hildesheim: Georg OlmsGoogle Scholar
Giovacchini, Julie 2003. “Le refus épicurien de la définition,” Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg 15: 71–89Google Scholar
Giovacchini, Julie 2019. “La tetrapharmakos: Formule authentique ou résumé simpliste de l’éthique épicurienne? Quelques élements sur le statut des abrégés et des florilèges dans la pédagogie du Jardin,” Philosophie antique 19: 29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovacchini, Julie 2020. “La confusion du juste chez Épicure, Hermarque et Lucrèce: Une inégalité intellectuelle des citoyenes?,” Fons 5, 39–59Google Scholar
Giovacchini, Julie, and Lemaire, Juliette 2014. “La philosophie populaire de Polystrate l’Épicurien,” in Cournet, Jean-Michel (ed.) Philosophie et langage ordinaire: De l’antiquité à la renaissance, Louvain: Peeters, 57–82Google Scholar
Giussani, Carlo 1896. Studi Lucreziani, vol. I, Turin: Ermano LoescherGoogle Scholar
Glidden, David 1971. “The Epicurean Theory of Knowledge,” PhD thesis, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
Glidden, David 1985. “Epicurean Prolēpsis,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3: 175–218Google Scholar
Goggins, Rory 2007. “Preconceptions and Epistemic Priority,” Ancient Philosophy 27, no. 2: 371–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, Victor 1977. La doctrine d’Épicure et le droit, Paris: VrinGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, Victor 1981. “La teoria epicurea del diritto,” Elenchos 2: 290–316Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Victor 2006 [1978]. “Remarques sur l’origine épicurienne de la ‘prénotion,’” in Brunschwig, Jacques (ed.), Les Stoïciens et leur logique, Paris: Vrin, 41–60Google Scholar
Gordon, Pamela 2012. The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, John Wiedhofft 1957. The Social Contract: A Critical Study of Its Development, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Green, Jeffrey 2015. “Solace for the Frustrations of Silent Citizenship,” Citizenship Studies 19, no. 5: 492–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie 2004. “Law and Obligations,” in Coleman, Jules, et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 514–47Google Scholar
Green, Leslie 2008. “Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals,” New York University Law Review 84, no. 4: 1–23Google Scholar
Green, Leslie 2009. “Legal Positivism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/legal-positivism/.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen 2011. The Swerve: How the World Became Modern, New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Miriam 1997. “Philosophy, Politics, and Politicians at Rome,” in Griffin, Miriam, and Barnes, Jonathan (eds.) Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–37Google Scholar
Grilli, Alberto 1953. Il problema della vita contemplativa nel mondo greco-romano, Milan: Fratelli BoccaGoogle Scholar
Grilli, Alberto 1996. “Considerazioni sul fr. 555 Us. di Epicuro,” in Giannantoni, Gabriele, and Gigante, Marcelo (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano, Naples: Bibliopolis, vol. I, 377–86Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 2003 [1971]. The Sophists, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hahmann, Andree, and Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2021. “Epicurus’ Divine Hedonism,” Mnemosyne 74: 401–22Google Scholar
Hahmann, Andree, and Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian. 2022. “Epicurus’ Non-Propositional Theory of Truth,” Mnemosyne 75: 739–58Google Scholar
Hardach, Karl von 2007. “‘Nicht hungern, nicht dürsten, nicht frieren’: Zum Lebensstandard der Athener zu Zeiten Epikurs,” in Hardach, Karl von (ed.) Wirtschaftshistorische Studien: Festgabe für Othmar Pickl, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 75–115Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review (1958): 593–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2012 [1961]. The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussleiter, Johanes 1935. Der Vegetarismus in der Antike, Berlin: TöpelmannCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinimann, Felix 1945. Nomos und Physis: Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel: Friedrich ReinhardtGoogle Scholar
Held, Katharina 2007. Hēdonē und Ataraxia bei Epikur, Paderborn: MentisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Klaus Friedrich 1997. Das Recht im Denken der Sophistik, Leipzig: B.G. TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Horky, Phillip Sydney 2021. “Laws and Justice among the Socratics: Contexts for Plato’s Republic,” Polis 38, no. 3: 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Christoph 2021. “Normative Naturalism in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy,” in Adamson, Peter, and Rapp, Christoph (eds.) State and Nature: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter, 59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, Pamela 1967. “The First Discovery of the Freewill Problem,” Philosophy 42, no. 162: 353–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, Pamela 1978. “Epicurus’ Attitude towards Democritus,” Phronesis 23, no. 1: 80–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind 2013. “Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism,” in LaFollette, Hugh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 3571–80Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, Margherita 1971. “L’epicureo Polistrato e le Categorie,” Parola del passato 26, no. 4: 280–9Google Scholar
Jürss, Fritz 1977. “Epikur und das Problem des Begriffs (Prolepse),” Philologus 121: 211–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürss, Fritz 1991. Die epikureische Erkenntnistheorie, Berlin: AkademieGoogle Scholar
Kaerst, Julius 1909. “Die Entstehung der Vertragstheorie im Altertum,” Zeitschrift für Politik 2: 505–38Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles 1981. “The Origins of Social Contract Theory,” in Kerferd, G. B. (ed.) The Sophists and Their Legacy, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 92–108Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles 1985. “Democritus and the Origins of Moral Psychology,” American Journal of Philology 106, no. 1: 1–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, Christian 2019. Epikur im lateinischen Mittelalter, Turnhout: BrepolsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Andreas 2001. Philosophiehistorie als Rezeptionsgeschichte: Die Reaktion auf Aristoteles’ De Anima-Noetik. Der frühe Hellenismus, Amsterdam: B. R. GrünerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamtekar, Rachana 2021. “Experience and Preconception in Epicurus’ Refutation of Determinism,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 60: 203–37Google Scholar
Kechagia, Eleni 2010. “Rethinking a Professional Rivalry: Early Epicureans against the Stoa,” Classical Quarterly 60, no. 1: 132–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 2008 [1934]. Reine Rechtslehre, Tübingen: Mohr SiebeckCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Klein, Jacob 2016. “The Stoic Argument from oikeiōsis,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50: 143–200Google Scholar
Kleve, Knut 1963. Gnosis Theōn: Die Lehre von der natürlichen Gotteserkenntnis in der epikureischen Theologie, Olso: UniversitetsforlagetGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David 2008. A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus, Las Vegas: ParmenidesGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David 2014. “Epicurus on Void,” in Ranocchia, Graziano, et al. (eds.) Space in Hellenistic Philosophy: Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, Berlin: De Gruyter, 83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Richard 1992. “The Defense of Justice in Plato’s Republic,” in Kraut, Richard (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Plato, New York: Cambridge University Press, 311–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Richard 2002. Aristotle: Political Philosophy, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman 1988. “Lex iniusta non est lex,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 33, no. 1: 99–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lathière, A. M. 1972. “Lucrèce traducteur d’Épicure,” Phoenix 26, no. 2: 123–33Google Scholar
Laursen, Simon 1988. “Epicurus’ On Nature XXV (Long-Sedley 20, B, C and j),” Cronache ercolanesi 18: 7–18Google Scholar
Lenman, James 2014. “Moral Naturalism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Sprung 2014 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/naturalism-moral/Google Scholar
Lévy, Carlos 1999. “Lucrèce et les Stoïciens,” in Poignault, Rémy (ed.) Présence de Lucrèce. Actes du colloque tenu à Tours (3–5 décembre 1998), Tours: Centre de recherches A. Piganiol, 87–98Google Scholar
Liebich, Werner 1960. “Aufbau, Absicht und Form der Pragmateiai Philodems,” PhD thesis, Humboldt University of BerlinGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony 1971. “Aisthesis, Prolepsis, and Linguistic Theory in Epicurus,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18: 114–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony 1985. “Pleasure and Social Utility: The Virtues of Being an Epicurean,” Entretiens Hardt 32: 283–324Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur Oncken, and Boas, George (eds.) 1965 [1935]. Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity, New York: Octagon BooksGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, Bernd 2005. “Cicero oder Epikur? Über einen ‘Paradigmenwechsel’ in Hobbes’ politischer Philosophie,” in Boros, Gábor (ed.) Der Einfluß des Hellenismus auf die Philosophe der Frühen Neuzeit, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 159–79Google Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap 1994. “Epicurus Peripateticus,” in Alberti, Antonina (ed.) Realtà e ragione, Florence: Olschki, 29–47Google Scholar
Manuwald, Anke 1972. Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs, Bonn: Rudolf HabeltGoogle Scholar
Manuwald, Bernd 1980. Der Aufbau der lukrezischen Kulturentstehungslehre (De Rerum Natura 5,925-1457), Wiesbaden: Franz SteinerGoogle Scholar
Manuwald, Bernd 2014. “Bürger als politische Akteure: Überlegungen zur allgemeinen Politikkompetenz bei Platon und Aristoteles,” Hyberboreus 20: 225–43Google Scholar
Masi, Francesca 2006. Epicuro e la filosofia della mente: Il XXV libro dell’opera Sulla natura, Sankt Augustin: AcademiaGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Sean 2010. “Epicureans on Kingship,” Cambridge Classical Journal 56: 178–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Sean 2017a. “Demetrius of Laconia and the Debate between the Stoics and the Epicureans on the Nature of Parental Love,” Classical Quarterly 67, no. 1: 149–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Sean 2017b. “The Epicurean Virtue of μεγαλοφυχία,” Classical Philology 112, no. 2: 175–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKirahan, Richard 2010. Philosophy Before Socrates, 2nd ed., Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Mehl, David 1999. “The Intricate Translation of the Epicurean Doctrine of ψυχή in Book 3 of Lucretius,” Philologus 143, no. 2: 272–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejer, Jørgen 2004. “Democritus and Democracy,” Apeiron 37, no. 1: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlan, Philip 1950. “Lucretius: Primitivist or Progressivist,” Journal of the History of Ideas 11, no. 3: 364–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Fred 1995. Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip 1988. Epicurus’ Ethical Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip 2020. “Friendship,” in Mitsis, Phillip (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 250–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip, and Piergiacomi, Enrico 2018. “Edonismi: Epicurei e Cirenaici a confronto,” in Mitsis, Phillip, and Piergiacomi, Enrico (eds.) La liberta, il piacere, la morte: Studi sull’ Epicureismo e sulla sua influenza, Rome: Carocci, 107–52Google Scholar
Moore, Stanley 1988. “Democracy and Commodity Exchange: Protagoras versus Plato,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5, no. 4: 357–68Google Scholar
Moraux, Paul 1957. À la recherché de l’Aristote perdu: Le dialogue “Sur la justice,” Leuven: Publications universitaires de LouvainGoogle Scholar
Morel, Pierre-Marie 2000. “Épicure, l’histoire et le droit,” Revue des études anciennes 102, no. 3: 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, Pierre-Marie 2008. “Method and Evidence on Epicurean Preconception,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23: 25–48Google Scholar
Morel, Pierre-Marie 2010. “Prudence aristotélicienne et prudence épicurienne,” in Silbeira, Denis Coitinho, and Hobuss, João (eds.) Virtudes, Direitos e Democracia, Pelotas: Editora Universitária UFPL, 11–30Google Scholar
Morel, Pierre-Marie 2019a. “Épicure et la phronēsis: Une autre sagesse pratique,” in Masi, Francesca, et al. (eds.) Ēthikē theōria: Studi sull’ Etica Nicomachea in onore di Carlo Natali, Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 365–84Google Scholar
Morel, Pierre-Marie 2019b. “Sexe, amour et politique chez Lucrèce,” Philosophie antique 19: 57–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, R. G. 1979. “Lycophron and Greek Theories of Social Contract,” Journal of the History of Ideas 40, no. 1: 121–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1972. Die epikureische Gesellschaftstheorie, Berlin: AkademieGoogle Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1980. “Le rapport entre la philosophie de la nature et la doctrine morale chez Democrite et Épicure,” in Romano, Fracesco (ed.) Democrito e l’atomismo antico: Atti del convegno internazionale, Catania: Facoltá di Lettere e Filosofia, Universitá di Catania, 325–51Google Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1983. “Konstituierung und Verbindlichkeit der Rechtsnormen bei Epikur,” in Gigante, Marcelo (ed.) ΣΥΖΗΤHΣΙΣ: Studi sull’ Epicurismo greco e romano, Naples: Gaetano Macchiaroli, vol. I, 153–83Google Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1984. “Die Stellung Demokrits in der antiken Sozialphilosophie,” in International Democritean Foundation (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Democritus, Xanthi: E. Bouloukos, 423–34Google Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1985. “Der antike Ursprung der Lehre vom Gesellschaftsvertrag,” in Müller, Reimar and Klenner, Hermann (eds.) Gesellschaftsvertragstheorien von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Berlin: Akademie, 5–29Google Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1987. “Zu einem Entwicklungsprinzip der epikureischen Anthropologie,” in Müller, Reimar (ed.) Polis und res publica: Studien zum antiken Gesellschafts- und Geschichtsdenken, Weimar: H. Böhlaus Nachfolger, 233–50Google Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1991. Die epikureische Ethik, Berlin: AkademieGoogle Scholar
Müller, Reimar 1997. Anthropologie und Geschichte, Berlin: AkademieCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müri, Walter 1976. “ΣΥΜΒΟΛΟΝ: Wort- und sachgeschichtliche Studie,” in Vischer, Eduard (ed.) Griechische Studien: Ausgewählte wort- und sachgeschichtliche Forschungen zur Antike, Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt, 1–44Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2007. Philosophy of Law, Malden, MA: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, P. P., and Kerferd, G. B. 1982. “Protagoras on Pre-Political Man: An Exchange,” Polis 4, no. 2: 18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Obbink, Dirk 1988. “Hermarchus, Against Empedocles,” Classical Quarterly 38, no. 2: 428–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, Dirk 1992. “‘What All Men Believe – Must Be True’: Common Conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic Philosophy,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10: 193–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obi, Augustine 1993. “Epicurus’ Foundation of Knowledge,” PhD thesis, Duquesne UniversityGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, David 1989. “The Invulnerable Pleasure of Epicurean Friendship,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30: 165–89Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Timothy 1997. “The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus,” Ancient Philosophy 17, no. 1: 119–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Timothy 2001a. “Would a Community of Wise Epicureans Be Just?,” Ancient Philosophy 21, no. 1: 133–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Timothy 2001b. “Is Epicurean Friendship Altruistic?,” Apeiron 34, no. 4: 269–305Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Timothy 2021. “The Normativity of Nature in Epicurean Ethics and Politics,” in Adamson, Peter, and Rapp, Christoff (eds.) State and Nature: Essays in Ancient Political Philosophy, Boston: De Gruyter, 181–99Google Scholar
Paganini, Gianni 2020. “Early Modern Epicureanism: Gassendi and Hobbes in Dialogue on Psychology, Ethics, and Politics,” in Mitsis, Phillip (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 671–710Google Scholar
Paneris, Joannis 1977. “Die Staatsphilosophie Demokrits im Hinblick auf die Lehre der älteren Sophisten,” PhD thesis, University of ViennaGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Nickolas 1995. Plato and the Republic, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Perelli, Luciano 1967. “La storia dell’ umanità nel v libro di Lucrezio,” Atti della Accademia delle science di Torino 101: 117–285Google Scholar
Philippson, Robert 1910. “Die Rechtsphilosophie der Epikureer,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 23, no. 3: 289–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippson, Robert 1923. “Review of Krohn, Der Epikureer Hermarchos,” Philologische Wochenschrift 43, no. 1: 1–10Google Scholar
Piergiacomi, Enrico 2013. “A che serve venerarlo, se dio non fa nulla? Epicuro e il piacere della preghiera,” Lexicon Philosophicum 1: 19–28Google Scholar
Piergiacomi, Enrico 2017. Storia delle antiche teologie atomiste, Rome: Sapienza Università EditriceGoogle Scholar
Pigeaud, Maurice Jackie 1984. “Épicure et Lucrèce et la naissance du langage,” Révue des études latines 61: 122–44Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max 1953. “Nomos und Physis,” Hermes 81, no. 4: 418–38Google Scholar
Polansky, Ronald 2014. “Giving Justice Its Due,” in Polansky, Ronald (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity, New York: SchockenGoogle Scholar
Porter, James 2002. “Φύσιολογειν: Nausiphanes of Teos and the Physics of Rhetoric: A Chapter in the History of Greek Atomism,” Cronache ercolanesi 32: 137–86Google Scholar
Porter, Mary Packer 1938. Cicero’s Presentation of Epicurean Ethics, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Procopé, J. F. 1971. “Democritus the Moralist and His Contemporaries,” PhD thesis, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
Procopé, J. F. 1989. “Democritus on Politics and the Care of the Soul,” Classical Quarterly 39, no. 2: 307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procopé, J. F. 1990. “Democritus on Politics and the Care of the Soul: Appendix,” Classical Quarterly 40, no. 1: 21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Christof 2021. “Whose State? Whose Nature? How Aristotle’s Polis Is ‘Natural,’” in Adamson, Peter, and Rapp, Christof (eds.) State and Nature: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter, 81–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechenauer, Georg 2019. “Kosmos und Polis bei Demokrit: Ordnung des Lebens und der Freiheit,” in Riedweg, Christoph (ed.) Philosophie für die Polis: Akten des 5. Kongress der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2016, Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Reinsberg, Carola 1989. Ehe, Hetärentum und Knabenliebe im antiken Griechenland, Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2017. “The Epicureans on Human Nature and Its Social and Political Consequences,” Polis 34, no. 1: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2020a. “Epicurus on What There Is,” in Arenson, Kelly (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, London: Routledge, 204–14Google Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2020b. “The Presentation of the Epicurean Virtues,” Apeiron 53, no. 4: 419–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2021. “epibolē tēs dianoias: Reflections on the Fourth Epicurean Criterion of Truth,” Classical Quarterly 71, no. 2: 601–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2022a. “A Functional Reading of the Epicurean Classification of Desires,” Apeiron 55, no. 2: 193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2022b. “Epicurus on Justice ‘In Itself’ (kath’ heauto) (Kuria Doxa 33),” Apeiron 55, no. 3: 443–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian 2023. “Protagoras on How Political Communities Come to Be,” Classical Philology 118, no. 3: 387–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian forthcoming a. “Democritus on Human Nature and Sociability,” Ancient PhilosophyGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian forthcoming b. “Epicurean Feelings (pathē) as Criteria,” Archiv für Geschichte der PhilosophieGoogle Scholar
Robitzsch, Jan Maximilian forthcoming c. “Gegen wen ist Kuria Doxa 33 gerichtet?,” MnemosyneGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Stuart 1996. “Epicurean Moral Theory,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13, no. 4: 389–410Google Scholar
Roskam, Geert 2007. Live Unnoticed (Λάθε Βιώσας): On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine, Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskam, Geert 2012. “Will the Epicurean Sage Break the Law if He Is Perfectly Sure That He Will Escape Detection? A Difficult Problem Revisited,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 142, no. 1 (2012): 23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskam, Geert 2020. “Politics and Society,” in Mitsis, Phillip (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 284–304Google Scholar
Rossi, Benjamin 2017. “Squaring the Epicurean Circle: Friendship and Happiness in the Garden,” Ancient Philosophy 37, no. 1: 153–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rover, Chiara 2022. “Lucretius’ Prolepsis,” Elenchos 43, no. 2: 279–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallmann, Klaus 1986. “Nunc huc rationis detulit ordo: Noch einmal zum Aufbau der Kulturlehre des Lukrez,” in Altheim-Stiehl, Ruth, and Rosenbach, Manfred (eds.) Beiträge zur altitalischen Geschichte: Festschrift Gerhard Radke, Münster: Aschendorff, 245–56Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. 1930. “Ennoia and ΠΡΟΛΗΨΙΣ in the Stoic Theory of Knowledge,” Classical Quarterly 24, no. 1: 44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Wolfgang 1943. “Nugae herculanenses,” Rheinisches Museum 92, no. 1: 35–55Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen 1990. Lukrez, der Kepos und die Stoiker: Untesuchungen zur Schule Epikurs und den Quellen von “De rerum natura,” Frankfurt: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcom 1996. “Epilogismos: An Appraisal,” in Frede, Michael, and Striker, Gisela (eds.) Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: Clarendon, 221–37Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcom 2010 [2000]. “Epicurean and Stoic Political Thought,” in Rowe, Christopher, and Schofield, Malcom (eds.) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press, 435–56Google Scholar
Schrijvers, Piet 1996. “Lucretius on the Origin and Development of Political Life (De Rerum Natura 5.1105–1160),” in Algra, Keimpe, et al. (eds.) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 220–30Google Scholar
Schrijvers, Piet 1999. Lucrèce et les sciences de la vie, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David 1982. “Two Conceptions of Vacuum,” Phronesis 27, no. 2: 175–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David 1988. “Epicurean Anti-Reductionism,” in Barnes, Jonathan, and Mignucci, Mario (eds.) Matter and Metaphysics, Naples: Bibliopolis, 295–327Google Scholar
Sedley, David 1997. “The Ethics of Brutus and Cassius,” Journal of Roman Studies 87: 41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David 1998a. “The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics,” in Everson, Stephen (ed.) Ethics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 129–50Google Scholar
Sedley, David 1998b. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David 2010 [2009]. “Epicureanism in the Roman Republic,” in Warren, James (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, New York: Cambridge University Press, 29–45Google Scholar
Sedley, David 2011. “Epicurus’ Theological Innatism,” in Fish, Jeffrey, and Sanders, Kirk (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, New York: Cambridge University Press, 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seel, Gerhard 1996. “Farà il saggio qualcosa che le leggi vietano, sapendo che non sarà scoperto?,” in Giannantoni, Gabriele, and Gigante, Marcelo (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano, Naples: Bibliopolis, vol. I, 341–60Google Scholar
Shelton, Jo-Ann 1995. “Contracts with Animals: Lucretius, De rerum natura,” Between the Species 11: 115–21Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, Emidio 1991. “Ploutos ē peniē: Il pensiero economico di Democrito,” Philologus 135, no. 2: 290–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, Emidio 2019. “Justice, Law, and Friendship: Ethical and Political Topics in Epicurus,” in Riedweg, Christoph (ed.) Philosophie für die Polis: Akten des 5. Kongress der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2016, Berlin: De Gruyter, 379–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoerri, Walter 1959. Späthellenistische Berichte über Welt, Kultur und Götter, Basel: Friedrich ReinhardtGoogle Scholar
Sprute, Jürgen 1989. Vertragstheoretische Ansätze in der antiken Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie: Die Konzeptionen der Sophisten und Epikureer, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and RuprechtGoogle Scholar
Striker, Giesela 1974. “Κριτήριον τῆς ἀληθείας,” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen Philologisch-Historische Klasse 2: 51–110Google Scholar
Struck, Peter 2004. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas 2006. “Ethical Naturalism,” in Copp, David (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, New York: Oxford University Press, 91–121Google Scholar
Tanner, Julia 2013. “Contractarianism and Secondary Direct Moral Standing for Marginal Humans and Animals,” Res Publica 19: 141–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1911. Epicurus, London: ConstableGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barnaby 2020. Lucretius and the Language of Nature, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrasher, John 2013. “Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractualism,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 423–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tohte, Theodor 1874. Epikurs Kriterien der Wahrheit, Clausthal: E. PieperGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, Voula 2016. “Epicurean Preconceptions,” Phronesis 61, no. 2: 160–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutrone, Fabio 2022. “A View from the Garden: Contemplative Isolation and Constitutive Sociability in Lucretius and in the Epicurean Tradition,” in Matuszewski, Rafał (ed.) Being Alone in Antiquity: Greco-Roman Ideas and Experiences of Misanthropy, Isolation and Solitude, Berlin: De Gruyter, 201–27Google Scholar
Usener, Hermann 1888. “Epikurische Spruchsammlung,” Wiener Studien 10: 175–201Google Scholar
Valachova, Cassandra 2018. “The Political and Philosophical Strategies of Roman Epicureans in the Late Republic,” PhD thesis, University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Vanderschraaf, Peter 2022. “An Epicurean State of Nature,” Homo OeconomicusCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Waerdt, Paul 1987. “The Justice of the Epicurean Wise Man,” Classical Quarterly 37, no. 2: 402–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Waerdt, Paul 1988. “Hermarchus and the Epicurean Genealogy of Morals,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 118: 87–106Google Scholar
Verde, Francesco 2016. “Aristotle and the Garden,” in Falcon, Andrea (ed.) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden: Brill, 35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlinsky, Alexander 1996. “Do Animals Have Freewill? Epicurus, on Nature, 20 B and 20 j Long-Sedley,” Hyperboreus 2: 125–38Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory 1945. “Ethics and Physics in Democritus,” Philosophical Review 54, no. 6: 578–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory 1946. “Ethics and Physics in Democritus,” Philosophical Review 55, no. 1 (1946): 53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelke, André-Jean 1986. “Santé de l’âme et bonheuer de la raison: La fonction thérapeutique de la philosophie dans l’épicurisme,” Études de Lettres 3: 67–87Google Scholar
Wald, Lucia 1968. “Observations sur l’emploi de animus, anima et mens dans l’oeuvre de Lucrèce,” in Harmatta, János (ed.) Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Altertums, Amsterdam: Hakkert, 135–44Google Scholar
Warren, James 2002. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Warren, James 2006a. “Democritus on Social and Psychological Harm,” in Brancacci, Aldo, and Morel, Pierre-Marie (eds.) Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Warren, James 2006b. “Epicureans and the Present Past,” Phronesis 51, no. 4: 362–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, James 2014. “Epicurus and the Unity of the Virtues,” in Colette-Ducic, Bernard, and Delcomminette, Sylvain (eds.) Unité et origine des vertus dans la philosophie anciennce, Brussels: Ousia, 213–36Google Scholar
Westman, Rolf 1955. Plutarch gegen Kolotes: Seine Schrift “Adversus Colotem” als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle, Helsinki: Akateeminen KirjakauppaGoogle Scholar
Westphalen, Klaus 1957. “Die Kulturenstehungslehre des Lukrez,” PhD thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University of MunichGoogle Scholar
White, Nicholas 1979. A Companion to Plato’s Republic, Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine 2008. Epicureans at the Origins of Modernity, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine 2019. How to Be Epicurean: The Ancient Art of Living Well, New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Jessica 2017. “Determinables and Determinates,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophie (Spring 2021 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/determinate-determinablesGoogle Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David 2009. “Epicurus on Εὐφροσύνη and Ἐνέργεια (DL 10.136),” Apeiron 42, no. 3: 221–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Raphael 2013. “Cicero and Gyges,” Classical Quarterly 63, no. 2: 801–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yona, Sergio, and Davis, Gregson (eds.) 2022. Epicurus in Rome: Philosophical Perspectives in the Ciceronian Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Charles 2006. “Aristotle’s Justice,” in Kraut, Richard (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 179–97Google Scholar
Zeller, Eduard 2013 [1923]. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Zinn, Pamela 2015. “Sic hominum genus est: Animals and the Continuum of Life in the De rerum natura of Lucretius,” PhD thesis, University of Dublin Trinity CollegeGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×