Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:55:07.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2024

Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, D. 1996. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. 1965. “Structure and Style in the Greater Romantic Lyric.” In From Sensibility to Romanticism: Essays Presented to Frederick A. Pottle, ed. Hilles, F. W. and Bloom, H.. New York. 527–60.Google Scholar
Adamson, J. and Monani, S.. 2017. “Introduction: Cosmovisions, Ecocriticism, and Indigenous Studies.” In Ecocriticism and Indigenous Studies: Conversations from Earth to Cosmos, ed. Monani, S. and Adamson, J.. New York. 1938.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M.. 1991. “Natur und Landschaft in der römischen Lyrik dargestellt an Frühlingsgedichten (Catull, 46; Horaz, Carm. 1.4; 4.7; 4.12).” Ktèma 16: 147–59.Google Scholar
Alpers, P. 1979. The Singer of the Eclogues. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpers, P. 1996. What Is Pastoral? Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, I. and Low, S., eds. 1992. Place Attachment. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. 2002. “Vergil’s Italy: Ethnography and Politics in First-Century Rome.” In Clio and the Poets, ed. Levene, D. and Nelis, D.. Leiden. 123–42.Google Scholar
Apostol, R. 2015. “Urbanus es, Corydon: Ecocritiquing Town and Country in Eclogue 2.” Vergilius 61: 328.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1989. Horace. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P., and Skinner, M., eds. 2004. Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. 2009. “Against Nature? Some Augustan Responses to Man-Made Marvels.” In Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture, ed. Hardie, P.. Oxford. 7594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. 2019. Vergil’s Green Thoughts: Plants, Humans, and the Divine. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. 2004. “Sound and Sense in Philodemus’ Poetics.” Cronache Ercolanesi 34: 527.Google Scholar
Aubin, R. A. 1936. Topographical Poetry in XVIII-Century England. New York.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1957. La Poétique de l’espace. Paris.Google Scholar
Bacon, H. 2001. “Frost and the Ancient Muses.” In The Cambridge Companion to Robert Frost, ed. Faggen, R.. Cambridge. 75100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldo, G. and Cazzuffi, E., eds. 2013. Regionis forma pulcherrima: percezioni, lessico, categorie del paesaggio nella letterature latina. Florence.Google Scholar
Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2015. “Sound and Silence in Calpurnius Siculus.” American Journal of Philology 136: 91120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1996. “Poetry, Praise, and Patronage.” Classical Antiquity 15: 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2009. “Rituals in Ink: Horace on the Greek Lyric Tradition.” In Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, ed. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, MA. 167–82.Google Scholar
Barrell, J. 1972. The Idea of Landscape and the Sense of Place 1730–1840: An Approach to the Poetry of John Clare. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barrell, J. and Bull, J., eds. 1974. The Penguin Book of English Pastoral Verse. London.Google Scholar
Bate, J. 1991. Romantic Ecology: Wordsworth and the Environmental Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Bate, J. 2000. The Song of the Earth. London.Google Scholar
Batinski, E. E. 1991. “Horace’s Rehabilitation of Bacchus.” Classical World 84: 361–78.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. 1997. “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. Martindale, C.. Cambridge. 125–44.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C. 2017. “Ancient Ecology: Problems of Terminology.” In Pollution and Environment in Ancient Life and Thought, ed. Cordovana, O. and Chiai, G. F.. Stuttgart. 51–9.Google Scholar
Berg, W. 1974. Early Virgil. London.Google Scholar
Best, S. and Marcus, S.. 2009. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betensky, A. 1979. “The Farmer’s Battles.” In Virgil’s Ascraean Song: Ramus Essays on the Georgics, ed. Boyle, A.. Berwick, 108–19.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B.. 2019. “Introduction.” In Antiquities beyond Humanism, ed. Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B.. Oxford. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonadeo, A. 2003. Mito e natura allo specchio: l’eco nel pensiero greco e latino. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bonjour, M. 1975. Terre natale: Études sur le patriotisme romain. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnafé, A. 1984. Poésie, nature, et sacré, vol. 1. Lyon.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, A. 1987. Poésie, nature, et sacré, vol. 2. Lyon.Google Scholar
Bosak-Schroeder, C. 2020. Other Natures: Environmental Encounters with Ancient Greek Ethnography. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. 1977. “Virgil’s Pastoral Echo.” Ramus 6: 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 1986. The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. H. 1989. “City and Country in Roman Satire.” In Satire and Society in Ancient Rome, ed. Braund, S. H.. Exeter. 2347.Google Scholar
Breed, B. 2006. Pastoral Inscriptions. London.Google Scholar
Brill, S. 2019. “Aristotle’s Meta-Zoology: Shared Life and Human Animality in the Politics.” In Antiquities beyond Humanism, ed. Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B.. Oxford. 97121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockliss, W. 2018. “‘Dark Ecology’ and the Works and Days.” Helios 45: 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockliss, W. 2019. Homeric Imagery and the Natural Environment. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2004. “Mapping (in) the Ancient World.” Journal of Roman Studies 94: 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2012. “Cartography.” In Geography in Classical Antiquity, ed. Dueck, D. and Brodersen, K.. Cambridge. 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1986. “The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism.” In The Norms of Nature, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge. 113–44.Google Scholar
Bryant, L. R. 2013. “Black.” In Prismatic Ecology: Ecotheory beyond Green, ed. Cohen, J. J.. Minneapolis, MN. 290310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, J. S. 2002. “Introduction.” In Ecopoetry: A Critical Introduction, ed. Bryson, J. S.. Salt Lake City, UT. 113.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. S. 2005. The West Side of Any Mountain: Place, Space, and Ecopoetry. Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1972. Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika: Dichtertum und Heilsweg. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Buell, L. 1995. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Buell, L. 2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Buller., J. L. 1981. “The Pathetic Fallacy in Hellenistic Pastoral.” Ramus 10: 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrus, V. 2018. Ancient Christian Ecopoetics. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Burt, S. 2012. “Scenic, or Topographical, Poetry.” In A Companion to Poetic Genre, ed. Martiny, E.. Chichester. 598613.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2011. The Matter of the Page: Essays in Search of Ancient and Medieval Authors. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2015. The Ancient Phonograph. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1977. “Horace, Odes, iii, 13 and iii, 23.” L’Antiquité Classique 46: 523–43.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1999. “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99: 289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 2012. Roman Lyric: Collected Papers on Catullus and Horace. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 2016. Hellenistic Epigrams: Contexts of Exploration. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 1999. The Poetics of Eros in Ancient Greece. Trans. J. Lloyd. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. Y. 1924. Horace: A New Interpretation. London.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. 1996. “Shaping the Rural Environment: Surveyors in Ancient Rome.” Journal of Roman Studies 86: 7499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B., ed. 2000. The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors. London.Google Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. 2017. “Alteram loci patriam, alteram iuris: ‘Double Fatherlands’ and the Role of Italy in Cicero’s Political Discourse.” In Citizens in the Graeco -Roman World: Aspects of Citizenship from the Archaic Period to ad 212, ed. Cecchet, L. and Busetto, A.. Leiden. 259–82.Google Scholar
Cartault, A. 1897. Étude sur les Bucoliques de Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar
Casey, E. 1987. Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Casey, E. 1997. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Chesi, G. M. and Spiegel, F., eds. 2020. Classical Literature and Posthumanism. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: Forme della comunicazione letteraria. Bari.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2017. “Heinze, Fraenkel e alter voci: contribute sparsi alla storia e al significato del dibattito su occasione e destinario in Orazio lirico.” Dictynna 14. No page numbers.Google Scholar
Claassen, J.-M. 1999. Displaced Persons: The Literature of Exile from Cicero to Boethius. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. J.. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58: 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. 2013. “Strange Strangers and Uncanny Hammers: Morton’s The Ecological Thought and the Phenomenological Tradition.” Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism 17: 98108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. 2011. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. 2015. Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. London.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. 1994. A Commentary on Virgil: Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1976. “The Argument of the End of Vergil’s Second Georgic.” Philologus 120: 232–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2002. “Sweet Folly: Horace, Odes 4.12 and the Evocation of Virgil.” In Horace and Greek Lyric Poetry, ed. Paschalis, M.. Rethymon. 129–40.Google Scholar
Cocola, J. 2016. Places in the Making: A Cultural Geography of American Poetry. Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R., ed. 1977. Vergil: Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Commager, S. 1957. “The Function of Wine in Horace’s Odes.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 88: 6880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commager, S. 1962. The Odes of Horace: A Critical Study. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Conington, J. and Nettleship, H., eds. [1898] 2007. The Works of Virgil. 5th ed. Rev . Haverfield, F.. Reprinted in Conington’s Virgil: Eclogues, ed. Hardie, P. and Breed, B.. Exeter.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2001. “Picture Arcadia: The Politics of Representation in Vergil’s Eclogues.” Vergilius 47: 80116.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 2007. The Poetry of Pathos. Ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convery, I., Corsane, G., and Davis, P., eds. 2012. Making Sense of Place: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Woodbridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copley, F. O. 1937. “The Pathetic Fallacy in Early Greek Poetry.” American Journal of Philology 58: 194209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, J. and Waldrep, G. C., eds. 2012. The Arcadia Project: North American Postmodern Pastoral. Boise, ID.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 2016. The Fragments of the Roman Historians: Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Costello, B. 2003. Shifting Ground: Reinventing Landscape in Modern American Poetry. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. 2021. “Mothers in Arms: Toward an Ecofeminist Reading of Vergil’s Georgics.” Vergilius 67: 183206.Google Scholar
Cramer, R. 1998. Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgica. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. 1996. “The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.” Environmental History 1: 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A., ed. 2012. Publio Virgilio Marone: Le Bucoliche. Rome.Google Scholar
Culler, J. 2015. Theory of the Lyric. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, D. 2004. “The Alcaic Kid (Horace, Carm. 3.13).” CW 97: 137–52.Google Scholar
Curtis, L. 2017. Imagining the Chorus in Augustan Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtius, E. R. [1953] 1983. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. W. R. Trask. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Cusset, C., ed. 1999. La nature et ses représentations dans l’Antiquité. Paris.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. 1954. “Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica.” AAWM 10: 547–62.Google Scholar
Damon, P. 1961. Modes of Analogy in Ancient and Medieval Verse. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, K. 2010. “Rome and the Sabine ‘Farm’: Aestheticism, Topography, and the Landscape of Production.” Phoenix 64: 102–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. 1991. Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. 2007. “Wine and the Symposium.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Cambridge. 207–20.Google Scholar
Davis, G. 2012. Parthenope: The Interplay of Ideas in Vergilian Bucolic. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P. J. 2002. “The Colonial Subject in Ovid’s Exile Poetry.” American Journal of Philology 123: 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davisson, M. T. 1982. “Duritia and Creativity in Exile: Epistulae ex Ponto 4.10.” Classical Antiquity 1: 2842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, P. 1970. “Intentional Structure of the Romantic Image.” In Romanticism and Consciousness: Essays in Criticism, ed. Bloom, H.. New York, 6577.Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2013. “Cicero and Roman Identity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Steel, C.. Cambridge. 122–38.Google Scholar
Deremetz, A. 1995. Le Miroir des Muses: poétiques de la réfléxivité à Rome. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2013. The Ecology of Others. Trans. Geneviève Godbout and Benjamin P. Luley. Chicago.Google Scholar
Desport, M. 1941. “L’écho de la nature et de la poésie dans les Églogues de Virgile.” Revue des Études Anciennes 43: 270–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desport, M. 1952. L’incantation virgilienne: Virgile et Orphée. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Dick, B. F. 1968. “Ancient Pastoral and the Pathetic Fallacy.” Comparative Literature 20: 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilke, O. A. W. 1971. The Roman Land Surveyors: An Introduction to the Agrimensores. New York.Google Scholar
Dunckel, A. 2002. “‘Mont Blanc’: Shelley’s Sublime Allegory of the Real.” In The Greening of Literary Scholarship: Literature, Theory, and the Environment, ed. Rosendale, S.. Iowa City, IA. 207–23.Google Scholar
DuQuesnay, I. 1981. “Vergil’s First Eclogue.” In Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, ed. Cairns, F.. Liverpool. 29182.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R., ed. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, L. 1992. From a Sabine Jar: Reading Horace, Odes 1.9. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton, F. N. 2012. Roots of Ecology: Antiquity to Haeckel. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Elder, J. 1985. Imagining the Earth: Poetry and the Vision of Nature. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Elliger, W. 1975. Die Darstellung der Landschaft in der griechischen Dichtung. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empson, W. 1935. Some Versions of Pastoral. London.Google Scholar
Evans, H. B. 1975. “Winter and Warfare in Ovid’s Tomis (Tristia 3.10).” Classical Journal 70: 19.Google Scholar
Evans, H. B. 1983. Publica Carmina: Ovid’s Books from Exile. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Evernden, N. 1996. “Beyond Ecology: Self, Place, and the Pathetic Fallacy.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, ed. Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H.. Athens, GA. 92104.Google Scholar
Fairer, D. 2011. “‘Where Fuming Trees Refresh the Thirsting Air’: The World of Eco- Georgic.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 40: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 2004. The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R.. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1999. “The Ovidian Corpus: Poetic Body and Poetic Text.” In Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and Its Reception, ed. Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S.. Cambridge. 127–41.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2014. “Philosophy in Vergil.” In The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry, ed. Garani, M. and Konstan, D.. Newcastle upon Tyne. 6190.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2016. “Ancient Commentaries on Theocritus’ Idylls and Virgil’s Eclogues.” In Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre, ed. Kraus, C. and Stray, C.. Oxford. 397418.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1999. “Mea Tempora: Patterning of Time in the Metamorphoses.” In Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and Its Reception, ed. Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S.. Cambridge. 1330.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2004. “Interpreting Sacrificial Ritual in Roman Poetry: Disciplines and Their Models.” In Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome Held at Stanford University in February 2002, ed. Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S.. Stuttgart, 122.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2006. “I Shall Be Read.” Review of P. Green (trans.), Ovid: The Poems of Exile: “Tristia” and the “Black Sea Letters” and Gaertner, J. F. (ed. and trans.), Ovid: Epistulae ex Ponto, Book I. London Review of Books 28.16: 1315.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. 2009. “Horace and the Greek Lyric Poets.” In Oxford Readings in Horace: Odes and Epodes, ed. Lowrie, M.. Oxford. 202–31.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. “Livy’s Revolution: Civic Identity and the Creation of the Res Publica.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution, ed. Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A.. Cambridge. 136–57.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2010. “‘Dionysiac Poetics’ and the Memory of Civil War in Horace’s Cleopatra Ode.” In Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars, ed. Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A.. Oxford. 223–32.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. 1993. I dispiaceri di un epicureo: Uno studio sulla poetica oraziana delle Epistole (con un capitol su Persio). Pisa.Google Scholar
Fisher-Wirth, A. and Street, L.-G.. 2013. “Editors’ Preface.” In The Ecopoetry Anthology, ed. Fisher-Wirth, A. and Street, L.-G.. San Antonio, TX. xxviixxxi.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. 2009. “Nature in Horace.” Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism 11: 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitter, C. 1995. Poetry, Space, Landscape: Toward a New Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fitton Brown, A. 1985. “The Unreality of Ovid’s Tomitan Exile.” Liverpool Classical Monthly 10: 1822.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1989. “Horace, Pleasure and the Text.” Arethusa 22: 81104.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1996. “Labor and Laborer in Latin Poetry: The Case of the ‘Moretum.’Arethusa 29: 389418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2016. “Resonance: The Sonic Environment of Vergil’s Eclogues.” Dictynna 13. No page numbers.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. and Spentzou, E., eds. 2018. The Production of Space in Latin Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, A. 2004. A New Theory for American Poetry: Democracy, The Environment, and the Future of Imagination. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, K. 2014. Finding Italy: Travel, Nation, and Colonization in Vergil’s Aeneid. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flintoff, E. 1974. “The Setting of Virgil’s Eclogues.” Latomus 33: 814–46.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 2002. “Masculinity under Threat? The Poetics and Politics of Inspiration in Latin Poetry.” In Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, ed. Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D.. Oxford. 141–59.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1957. Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1941. “Pattern of Sound and Atomistic Theory in Lucretius.” American Journal of Philology 62: 1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, J. F., ed. 2005. Ovid, Epistulae ex Ponto, Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, D. 1982. “Il paesaggio siciliano delle Bucoliche e l’Arcadia.” Civiltà classica e cristiana 3: 183–9.Google Scholar
Galasso, L. 2009. “Epistulae ex Ponto.” In A Companion to Ovid, ed. Knox, P. E.. Malden, MA. 194206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. 1991. “Man and Beast in Lucretius and the Georgics.” Classical Quarterly 41: 414–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius, and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamberale, L. 1995. “Aspetti del paesaggio oraziano.” In Musis Amicus: Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi su Q. Orazio Flacco, Chieti, 4–6 Maggio 1993, ed. Coletti, M. and Domenicucci, P.. Chietti. 91116.Google Scholar
Gargola, D. 2017. The Shape of the Roman Order: The Republic and Its Spaces. Chapel Hill, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrard, G. 1996. “Radical Pastoral?Studies in Romanticism 35: 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrard, G. 2012. Ecocriticism. London.Google Scholar
Garrard, G., ed. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gasser, F. 1999. Germana Patria: Die Geburtsheimat in den Werken römischer Autoren der späten Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gaster, T. 1950. Thespis: Ritual, Myth, and Drama in the Ancient Near East. New York.Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2013. Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geikie, A. 1912. The Love of Nature among the Romans during the Later Decades of the Republic and the First Century of the Empire. London.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2015. “Aristotle on Essence and Habitat.” In Oxford Studies on Ancient Philosophy, Vol. XLVIII, ed.Inwood, B.. Oxford. 267–94.Google Scholar
Geue, T. 2020. “The Imperial Animal: Virgil’s Georgics and the Anthropo- /Theriomorphic Enterprise.” In Classical Literature and Posthumanism, ed. Chesi, G. M. and Spiegel, F.. London. 103–10.Google Scholar
Gifford, T. 1995. Green Voices: Understanding Contemporary Nature Poetry. Manchester.Google Scholar
Gifford, T. 1999. Pastoral. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, T. 2006. “Post-Pastoral as a Tool for Ecocriticism.” In Pastoral and the Humanities: Arcadia Re-inscribed, ed. Skoie, M. and Bjørnstad-Velázquez, S.. Exeter. 1424.Google Scholar
Gifford, T. 2013. “Pastoral, Anti-Pastoral, and Post-Pastoral.” In The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment, ed. Westling, L.. Cambridge. 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, T. 2016. “The Environmental Humanities and the Pastoral Tradition.” In Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity, ed. Schliephake, C.. Lanham, MD. 159–73.Google Scholar
Gilcrest, D. 2002. Greening the Lyre: Environmental Poetics and Ethics. Reno, NV.Google Scholar
Gilhuly, K. and Worman, N.. 2014. Space, Place, and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glotfelty, C. 1996. “Introduction: Literary Studies in an Age of Environmental Crisis.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, ed. Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H.. Athens, GA. xvxxxvii.Google Scholar
Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H., eds. 1996. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 1993. “Mitte Sectari, Rosa Quo Locorum Sera Moretur: Time and Nature in Horace’s Odes.” Classical Philology 88: 1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2010. “What Is Local Identity? The Politics of Cultural Mapping.” In Local Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World, ed. Whitmarsh, T.. Cambridge. 4668.Google Scholar
Goodbody, A. 2014. “Ecocritical Theory: Romantic Roots and Impulses from Twentieth -Century European Thinkers.” In The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment, ed. Westling, L.. Cambridge, 6174.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, M. S. 1981. “North Italian Rivers and Lakes in the Georgics.” Vergilius 27: 1222.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, M. S. 2015. “Early Reception of Vergil’s Georgics: Protinus Italiam Concepit.” Vergilius 61: 4376.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2009. “Horace, Suetonius, and the Lives of the Greek Poets.” In Perceptions of Horace: A Roman Poet and his Readers, ed. Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M.. Cambridge. 140–60.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E. 2016. “Reception Studies: The Cultural Mobility of Classics.” Daedalus 145: 41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, C. and Sakdapolrak, P.. 2013. “Translocality: Concepts, Applications and Emerging Research Perspectives.” Geography Compass 7: 373–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1997. “Cult and Personality in Horace.” Journal of Roman Studies 87: 5469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 2008. “The Fourth Georgic, Virgil and Rome.” In Vergil’s Georgics, ed. Volk, K.. Oxford. 225–48.Google Scholar
Grove, A. T. and Rackham, O.. 2001. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological History. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 1991. Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2010. “Literary Criticism.” In A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, ed. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Malden, MA. 337–65.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1990. “Sacrifice, Society, and Virgil’s Ox-Born Bees.” In Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, ed. Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J.. Atlanta, GA. 209–23.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haight, G. H. 1910. “The Feeling of the Ancients for Nature, with Special Reference to Quintus Horatius Flaccus.” The Classical Weekly 3: 242–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, D. 1983. Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. New Haven, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1993. “Response.” In Hellenistic History and Culture, ed. Green, P.. Berkeley, CA. 127–37.Google Scholar
Hanses, E. 2021. “Embodying Nature: Vergil’s Defeminization of Lucretian Natura in the Georgics.” Vergilius 67: 207–24.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. “Ut Pictura Poesis? Horace and the Visual Arts.” In Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillenium, ed. Rudd, N.. Ann Arbor, MI. 120–39.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1998. Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2002. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harper, K. 2017. The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, W. V. 2013. “Defining and Detecting Mediterranean Deforestation, 800 bce to 700 ce.” In The Ancient Mediterranean Environment between Science and History, ed. Harris, W. V.. Leiden. 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1998. “The Lark Ascending: Corydon, Corydon (Vergil, Ecl. 7.70).” Classical Quarterly 48: 310–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2004. “Virgil’s Corycius Senex and Nicander’s Georgica: Georgics 4.116–48.” In Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality, ed. Gale, M.. London, 109–23.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2007a. Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2007b. “Horatian Self-Representations.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Cambridge, 2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2007c. “Town and Country.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Cambridge. Cambridge, 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J., ed. 2017. Horace, Odes, Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hart, C. R. 1954. “Catullus and Horace, Poets of Nature.” Classical Bulletin 30: 57–8.Google Scholar
Hartman, G. 1982. “Wordsworth, Inscriptions, and Romantic Nature Poetry.” In From Sensibility to Romanticism: Essays Presented to Frederick A. Pottle, ed. Hilles, F. W. and Bloom, H.. New York. 389413.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 1980. The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History. Trans. J. Lloyd. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Heaney, S. 2001. Electric Light. New York.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. [1923] 2009. “The Horatian Ode.” In Horace: Odes and Epodes, ed. Lowrie, M.. Oxford. 1132.Google Scholar
Heise, U. 2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, U., Christensen, J., and Niemann, M., eds. 2017. The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helzle, M. 2006. “Fiktion und Realität in Ovids Exildichtung am Beispiel Epistulae ex Ponto IV 7.” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 30: 139–52.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1978. “Horaz als Aretaloge des Dionysos: Credite Posteri.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82: 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hexter, R. 1987. “O Fons Bandusiae: Blood and Water in Horace, Odes 3.13.” In Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, ed. Whitby, M., Hardie, P. R., and Whitby, M.. Bristol. 131–9.Google Scholar
Highet, G. 1949. The Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hiltner, K. 2011. What Else Is Pastoral? Renaissance Literature and the Environment. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1985. “Booking the Return Trip: Ovid and Tristia 1.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 31: 1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiss, T. 1990. The Experience of Place: A New Way of Looking at and Dealing with Our Radically Changing Cities and Countryside. New York.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2005. “‘Daedala Lingua’: Crafted Speech in ‘De Rerum Natura.’American Journal of Philology 126: 527–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2015. “Situating Scamander: Natureculture in the Iliad.” Ramus 44: 2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2016. “Foreword: Before Nature?” In Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity, ed. Schliephake, C.. Lanham, MD. ixxiii.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2017. “The Generous Text: Animal Intuition, Human Knowledge, and Written Transmission in Pliny’s Books on Medicine.” In Knowledge, Text and Practice in Ancient Technical Writing, ed.Formisano, M. and van der Eijk, P.. Cambridge. 231–51.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2019. “On Stoic Sympathy.” In Antiquities beyond Humanism, ed. Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B.. Oxford. 239–70.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2002. Ovid: The Poet and His Work. Trans. G. M. Goshgarian. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Horden, P. and Purcell, N.. 2000. The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hornbeck, C. 2014. “Caelum Ipsum Petimus: Daedalus and Icarus in Horace’s Odes.” Classical Journal 109: 147–69.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1998. “The First Person Singular in Horace’s Carmina.” In Style and Tradition: Studies in Honour of Wendell Clausen, ed. Knox, P. E. and Foss, C.. Stuttgart. 4054.Google Scholar
Houser, H. 2014. Ecosickness in Contemporary U.S. Fiction: Environment and Affect. New York.Google Scholar
Howarth, W. 1996. “Some Principles of Ecocriticism.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, ed. Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H.. Athens, GA. 6991.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. 1927. Le réalisme dans les Bucoliques de Virgile. Liège.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1998. The Pipes of Pan. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, J. A. 2017. Byron’s Nature: A Romantic Vision of Cultural Ecology. London.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. D. 2011. “Ancient Deforestation Revisited.” Journal of the History of Biology 44: 4357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humboldt, A.. 1849–58. Cosmos: A Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe. Vol. 1. Trans. E. C. Otté. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, A. 2016. Reviving Roman Religion: Sacred Trees in the Roman World. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, A. and Marlow, H.. 2019. Ecology and Theology in the Ancient World: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 1999. Theocritus: A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, W. W. 1915. “The Ancient Appreciation of Mountain Scenery.” Classical Journal 11: 7084.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2006. “Ovid, Tristia 1.2: High Drama on the High Seas.” Greece & Rome 53: 7391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isayev, E. 2017. Migration, Mobility and Place in Ancient Italy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. 1993. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachmann, G. 1922. “Die Dichterische Technik in Vergils Bukolika.” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum 49: 101–20.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. 1997. Livy’s Written Rome. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, P. 1903. “Eine Prosaquelle Vergils und ihre Umsetzung in Poesie durch den Dichter.” Hermes 38: 244–64.Google Scholar
James, D. and Tew, P., eds. 2009. New Versions of Pastoral: Post-Romantic, Modern, and Contemporary Responses to the Tradition. Cranbury, NJ.Google Scholar
Jameson, V. 1997. “What Words Can Do: Horace, C. 3, 13, ‘O Fons Bandusiae.’Helios 24: 4459.Google Scholar
Janko, R., ed. 2000. Philodemus: On Poems Book One. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1982. Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1989. “Virgil and Arcadia.” JRS 79: 2639.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil’s Experience. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. [1779] 2006. The Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets: With Critical Observations on Their Works. Ed. Lonsdale, R.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. 2004. Symposion of Praise: Horace Returns to Lyric in Odes IV. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 1982. The Idea of Lyric: Lyric Modes in Ancient and Modern Poetry. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. and Papaioannou, S.. 2013. “Introduction: Idyllic Landscapes in Antiquity: The Golden Age, Arcadia, and the locus amoenus.” Acta Antiqua 53: 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. 2011. Virgil’s Garden. London.Google Scholar
Jones, P. J. 2005. Reading Rivers in Roman Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaloudis, N. 2016. “Daphnis’ Folksong: The Euphonists’ Effect on the Creation of a Textual Performance.” In Voice and Voices in Antiquity, ed. Slater, N.. Leiden. 208–30.Google Scholar
Kania, R. 2012. “Orpheus and the Reinvention of Bucolic Poetry.” American Journal of Philology 133: 657–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, R. 2016. Vergil’s Eclogues and the Art of Fiction: A Study of the Poetic Imagination. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakasis, E. 2011. Song Exchange in Roman Pastoral. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. 2017. Recomposing Ecopoetics: North American Poetry of the Self-Conscious Anthropocene. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1987. “‘Arcades ambo’: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia.” Hermathena 143: 4759.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1992. “Augustan and Anti-Augustan: Reflections on Terms of Reference.” In Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London. 2658.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 2013. “The Political Epistemology of Infinity.” In Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, ed. Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D., and Sharrock, A.. Oxford. 5167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. 2000. “Ecocriticism: What Is It Good For?Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 7: 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1935. “Horazerklärungen.” Philologus 90: 277–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1967. Virgil: Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis. Zürich.Google Scholar
Knickerbocker, S. 2012. Ecopoetics: The Language of Nature, the Nature of Language. Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. 2013. How Forests Think. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. 1998. “Vergil Announcing the Aeneid: On Georg. 3.1–48.” In Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, ed. Stahl, H.-P.. London. 120.Google Scholar
Kroeber, K. 1994. Ecological Literary Criticism: Romantic Imagining and the Biology of Mind. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronenberg, L. 2000. “The Poet’s Fiction: Virgil’s Praise of the Farmer, Philosopher, and Poet at the End of ‘Georgics 2.’Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 341–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronenberg, L. 2009. Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurke, L. 2013. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1963. Orazio e l’ideologia del principato. Turin.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1977. “Senex Corycius.” In Atti del convegno virgiliano sul bimillenario delle Georgiche. Naples. 3766.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago.Google Scholar
Lana, I. 1993. Orazio: dalla poesia al silenzio. Venosa.Google Scholar
Lanata, G. 1996. “Sappho’s Amatory Language.” Trans. W. Robins. In Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches, ed. Greene, E.. Berkeley, CA. 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, M. 2011. Eco-Republic: What the Ancients Can Teach Us About Ethics, Virtue, and Sustainable Living. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Larson, J. 2001. Greek Nymphs: Myth, Cult, Lore. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurand, V. 2005. “La sympathie universelle: union et separation.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 517–35.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1974. Vergil’s Eclogues: Landscapes of Experience. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1988. The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Leclerq, R. 1996. Le divin loisir: Essai sur les Bucoliques de Virgile. Brussels.Google Scholar
Lee, M. O. 1969. Word, Sound, and Image in the Odes of Horace. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Lee, M. O. 1970. “Everything Is Full of Gods: A Discussion of Horace’s Imagery.” Arion 9: 246–63.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1974. La production de l’espace. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. 2016. “On Bees, Poets and Plato.” In Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists and Biography, ed. Fletcher, R. and Hanink, J.. Cambridge, 177–97.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2016. “Vergil’s Second Eclogue and the Class Struggle.” CP 111: 406–33.Google Scholar
LeVen, P. 2020. Music and Metamorphosis in Graeco-Roman Thought. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, P. 1993. “People in a Landscape: Theokritos.” In Hellenistic History and Culture, ed. Green, P.. Berkeley, CA. 111–27.Google Scholar
Lewicka, M. 2011. “Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years?Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1982. Poeta Creator: Studien zu einer Figur der antiken Dichtung. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipka, M. 2001. Language in Vergil’s Eclogues. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipka, M. 2002. “Notes on Fagus in Vergil’s Eclogues.” Philologus 146: 133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers: Volume 1, Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Love, G. A. 1990. “Revaluing Nature: Toward an Ecological Criticism.” Western American Literature 25: 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, G. A. 1992. “Et in Arcadia Ego: Pastoral Theory Meets Ecocriticism.” Western American Literature 27: 195207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. and Boas, G.. 1935. Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 1997. Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1974. “Scilicet et tempus veniet … : Virgil, Georgics 1.463–514.” In Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry, ed. Woodman, A. J. and West, D.. Cambridge. 4766.Google Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. 2013. “Virgil’s Bacchus and the Roman Republic.” In Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic, ed. Nelis, D. and Farrell, J.. Oxford. 124–45.Google Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. 2014. “The Mixed Blessings of Bacchus in Virgil’s Georgics.” Dictynna 11. No page numbers.Google Scholar
Mader, G. 2002. “That St(r)ain Again: Blood, Water, and Generic Allusion in Horace’s Bandusia Ode.” American Journal of Philology 123: 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkki, L. 1992. “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees.” Cultural Anthropology 7: 2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malpas, J. 1999. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds.Google Scholar
Martelli, F. and Sissa, G.., eds. 2023. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Environmental Imagination. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993. “Introduction.” In Horace Made New, ed. Martindale, C. and Hopkins, D.. Cambridge. 126.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1997. “Green Politics: The Eclogues.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. Martindale, C.. Cambridge. 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, L. 1964. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. Oxford.Google Scholar
Marx, L. 1986. “Pastoralism in America.” In Ideology and Classic American Literature, ed. Bercovitch, S. and Jehlen, M.. Cambridge. 3669.Google Scholar
Mauduit, C. and Luccioni, P., eds. 1998. Paysages et milieu naturels dans la literature antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. 1983. “The Civil Status of Corydon.” Classical Quarterly 33: 298300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R., ed. 2012. Horace, Odes, Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCarter, S. 2015. Horace between Freedom and Slavery: The First Book of Epistles. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
McGann, M. J. 1969. Studies in Horace’s First Book of Epistles. Brussels.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. 2009. Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae Ex Ponto. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, J. and Sluiter, I., eds. 2016. Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity: Natural Environment and Cultural Imagination. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, J. 1974. The Comedy of Survival: Studies in Literary Ecology. New York.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. 1980. Virgil’s Georgics: A New Interpretation. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1994. Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: The Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London.Google Scholar
Mitsdörffer, W. 1938. “Vergils Georgica und Theophrast.” Philologus 93: 449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. 2007. “Philosophy and Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S.. Cambridge. 165–80.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1892. “Zum römishen Bodenrecht.” Hermes 27: 79117.Google Scholar
Mordine, M. J. 2010. “Sine me, liber, ibis: The Poet, The Book and the Reader in Tristia 1.1.” Classical Quarterly 60: 524–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L. 1999. Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s Georgics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T. 2007. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Muir, J. [1911] 1997. “My First Summer in the Sierra.” In Nature Writings, ed. Cronon, W.. New York. 147309.Google Scholar
Murley, C. 1940. “Plato’s Phaedrus and Theocritean Pastoral.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 71: 281–95.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. D. 2000. Farther Afield in the Study of Nature-Oriented Literature. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. 2014. “Ovid’s Self-Reception in His Exile Poetry.” In A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid, ed. Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E.. Chichester. 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B., ed. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B., ed. 1990. Virgil: Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nagle, B. R. 1980. The Poetics of Exile: Program and Polemic in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto of Ovid. Brussels.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. 2005. Reading after Actium: Vergil’s Georgics, Octavian, and Rome. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauta, R. 1994. “Historicizing Reading: The Aesthetics of Reception and Horace’s ‘Soracte Ode.’” In Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature, ed. De Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P.. Leiden. 207–30.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. 2006. “Panegyric in Virgil’s Bucolics.” In Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, ed. Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T.. Leiden. 301–32.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2004. “Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles.” Dictynna 1. No page numbers.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. and Royo, M., eds. 2014. Lire la ville: Fragments d’une archéologie littéraire de Rome antique. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. 1998. God and the Land: The Metaphysics of Farming in Hesiod and Vergil. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. 1997. “The Role of the Book in Tristia 3.1.” Ramus 26: 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. K., 1967. The Concept of Vates in Augustan Poetry. Brussels.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1991. Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 2008. “The Style of Virgil’s Eclogues.” In Vergil’s Eclogues, ed. Volk, K.. Oxford. 4863.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M.. 1970. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M.. 1978. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N.. 2004. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nolan, S. 2017. Unnatural Ecopoetics: Unlikely Spaces in Contemporary Poetry. Reno, NV.Google Scholar
North, J. A. 2005. “Religion and Rusticity.” In Urban Society in Roman Italy, ed. Cornell, T. J. and Lomas, K.. London. 141–56.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Nye, D. and Emmett, R., 2017. The Environmental Humanities: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Obbink, D., ed. 1995. Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. 2014. “Two New Poems by Sappho.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 189: 3249.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2004. “The Power of Image-Makers: Representation and Revenge in Ovid Metamorphoses 6 and Tristia 4.” Classical Antiquity 23: 285321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Otis, B. 1963. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Owen, S. G., ed. 1915. P. Ovidi Nasonis Tristium Libri Quinque, Ibis, Ex Ponto, Libri Quattuor, Halieutica, Fragmenta. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. 2018. The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Responses to Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1955. Meaning and the Visual Arts. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. 2013. “Embracing Vergil’s ‘Arcadia’: Constructions and representations of a literary topos in the poetry of the Augustans.” Acta Antiqua 53: 145–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paraskeviotis, G. C. 2016. “The Echo in Vergilian Pastoral.” L’Antiquité Classique 85: 4564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, A. 1957. “Landscape in Greek Poetry.” Yale Classical Studies 15: 329.Google Scholar
Parry, A. 1972. “The Idea of Art in Virgil’s Georgics.” Arethusa 5: 3552.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. [1920] 1964. Orazio lirico: studi. Florence.Google Scholar
Payne, M. 2007. Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2010. The Animal Part: Human and Other Animals in the Poetic Imagination. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2014. “The Natural World in Greek Literature and Philosophy.” In Oxford Handbooks Online in Classical Studies, ed. Williams, G.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.013.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S. and Williams, D. F.. 1986. Amphorae and the Roman Economy: An Introductory Guide. New York.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. 1989. The Poet’s Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil’s Georgics. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. 1996. “The ‘Dying Gallus’ and the Design of Eclogue 10.” Classical Philology 91: 128–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkell, C. 2001. “Vergil Reading His Twentieth-Century Readers: A Study of Eclogue 9.” Vergilius 47: 6488.Google Scholar
Perret, J., ed. 1961. Virgile, Les Bucoliques. Paris.Google Scholar
Perret, J. 1965. Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar
Perutelli, A. 2000. “Bucolics.” In A Companion to the Study of Virgil, ed. Horsfall, N.. Leiden. 2762.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. 2003. The Truth of Ecology: Nature, Culture, and Literature in America. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieper, C. 2016. “Polyvalent Tomi: Ovid’s Landscape of Relegation and the Romanization of the Black Sea Region.” In Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity: Natural Environment and Cultural Imagination, ed. McInerney, J. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden. 408–30.Google Scholar
Pigeaud, J. 1977. “Nature, culture et poésie dans les Géorgiques de Virgile.” Helmántica 28: 431–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilipović, J. 2013. “Ad Sidera: Tree-Space Symbolism in Plato’s Phaedrus and Vergil’s Eclogues.” Acta Antiqua 53: 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 2010. “Against λεπτότης: Rethinking Hellenistic Aesthetics.” In Creating a Hellenistic World, ed. Erskine, A. and Llewellyn-Jones, L.. Swansea. 271312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1964. Die Hirtendichtung Virgils. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1970. Horazische Lyrik: Interpretationen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2010. “Landscape.” In The Edinburgh Companion to Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Bispham, E., Harrison, T., and Sparkes, B. A.. Edinburgh. 123–34.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2012. “Rivers and the Geography of Power.” Pallas 90: 373–87.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2017. “A Second Nature? The Riverine Landscapes of the Romans.” In Fluvial Landscapes in the Roman World, ed. Franconi, T. V.. Portsmouth, RI. 159–64.Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. 2010. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1970. Virgil’s Pastoral Art. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1975. “Virgil’s First Eclogue: Poetics of Enclosure.” In Ancient Pastoral: Ramus Essays on Greek and Latin Pastoral Poetry, ed. Boyle, A.. Berwick. 81104.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1979. Virgil’s Poem of the Earth: Studies in the Georgics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 2000. Horace’s Carmen Saeculare: Ritual Magic and the Poet’s Art. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 2008. Poetic Interplay: Catullus and Horace. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. 1963. Latin Explorations. London.Google Scholar
Raber, K. 2007. “Recent Ecocritical Studies of English Renaissance Literature.” English Literary Renaissance 37: 151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramazani, J. 2015. A Transnational Poetics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Ramazani, J. 2017. “The Local Poem in a Global Age.” Critical Inquiry 43: 670–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, B. 2003. “Some Addressees of Virgil’s Georgics and Their Audience.” Vergilius 49: 1741.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O., ed. 1897. Scaenicae Romanorum Poesis Fragmenta. 3rd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rigby, K. 2004a. “Earth, World, Text: On the (Im)possibility of Ecopoiesis.” New Literary History 34: 427–42.Google Scholar
Rigby, K. 2004b. Topographies of the Sacred: The Poetics of Place in European Romanticism. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2015. The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. M. and Westra, L., eds. 1997. The Greeks and the Environment. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. and Westra, L., eds. 2002. Thinking About The Environment: Our Debt to the Classical and Medieval Past. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Roman, L. 2014. Poetic Autonomy in Ancient Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romm, J. S. 1992. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1997. “Ovid’s Heroides and Tristia: Voices from Exile.” Ramus 26: 2956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. 1969. The Green Cabinet. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 1987. Virgil’s Elements: Physics and Poetry in the Georgics. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, R. 2007. “Varro’s picta Italia (RR I.ii.1) and the Odology of Roman Italy.” Hermes 135: 286300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roudometof, V. 2016. “Theorizing Glocalization: Three Interpretations.” European Journal of Social Theory 19: 391408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. 2010. The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. 1960. “Patterns in Horatian Lyric.” American Journal of Philology 81: 373–92.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1993. “Horace as a Moralist.” In Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium, ed. Rudd, N.. Ann Arbor, MI. 6488.Google Scholar
Rueckert, W. [1978] 1996. “Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, ed. Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H.. Athens, GA. 105–23.Google Scholar
Ruskin, J. [1856] 1904. The Works of John Ruskin. Ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, A.. Vol. 5. London.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. 2000. Reflections on Exile, and Other Essays. London.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. 2006. “‘Using Green Words’ or ‘Abusing Bucolic Ground.’” In Pastoral and the Humanities: Arcadia Re-inscribed, ed. Skoie, M. and Bjørnstad-Vélazquez, S.. Exeter. 313.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. 2008. Bucolic Ecology: Virgil’s Eclogues and the Environmental Literary Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Sayre, L. 2016. “‘How/to Make Fields Fertile’: Ecocritical Lessons from the History of Virgil’s Georgics in Translation.” In Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity, ed. Schliephake, C.. Lanham, MD. 175–96.Google Scholar
Schafer, ([1977] 1993). The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. New York.Google Scholar
Schama, S. 1995. Landscape and Memory. New York.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2004. “Human Mobility in Roman Italy, I: The Free Population.” Journal of Roman Studies 94: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2005. “Human Mobility in Roman Italy, II: The Slave Population.” Journal of Roman Studies 95: 6479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W., ed. 2018. The Science of Roman History: Biology, Climate, and the Future of the Past. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 1997. “The Boundaries of Knowledge in Virgil’s Georgics.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution, ed. Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A.. Cambridge. 6389.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2009. “Horace’s Bacchic Poetics.” In Perceptions of Horace: A Roman Poet and his Readers, ed. Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M.. Cambridge. 6179.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. [1795–6] 1985. “On Naïve and Sentimental Poetry.” Trans. J. A. Eliot, mod. H. B. Nisbet. In German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: Winckelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, Goethe, ed. Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge. 180232.Google Scholar
Schliephake, C. 2016a. “Introduction.” In Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity, ed. Schliephake, C.. Lanham, MD. 115.Google Scholar
Schliephake, C., ed. 2016b. Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Schlögel, K. 2016. In Space We Read Time: On the History of Civilization and Geopolitics. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1972. Poetische Reflexion: Vergils Bukolik. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1975. “Arkadien: Abendland und Antike.” Antike und Abendland 21: 3657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1987. Bukolische Leidenschaft, oder, Über antike Hirtenpoesie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1997. Sabinum: Horaz und sein Landgut im Licenzatal. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 2008. “Arcadia: Modern Occident and Classical Antiquity.” In Vergil’s Eclogues, ed. Volk, K.. Oxford. 1647.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2003. “Stoic Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge. 233–56.Google Scholar
Schönbeck, G. 1962. Der Locus Amoenus von Homer bis Horaz. Cologne.Google Scholar
Scigaj, L. 1999. Sustainable Poetry: Four American Ecopoets. Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1963. “Nature and the World of Man in Greek Literature.” Arion 2: 1953.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1966. “Orpheus and the Fourth Georgic: Vergil on Nature and Civilization.” American Journal of Philology 87: 307–25.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1969. “Horace, Odes 2.6 (Septime, Gadis aditure mecum): Poetic Landscape and Poetic Imagination.” Philologus 113: 235–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1981. Poetry and Myth in Ancient Pastoral. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellar, W. Y. 1897. The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R., ed. 1985. Q. Horati Flacci Opera. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1994. Seduction and Repetition in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, D., ed. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemos: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, D. 2001. “‘As Is the Generation of Leaves’ in Homer, Simonides, Horace and Stobaeus.” In The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, ed. Boedeker, D. D. and Sider, D.. Oxford. 263–93.Google Scholar
Skoie, M. 2006. “City and Countryside in Vergil’s Eclogues.” In City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity, ed. Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R.. Leiden. 297325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1971. “Pindar’s House.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 12: 141–52.Google Scholar
Slatkin, L. 2004. “Measuring Authority, Authoritative Measures: Hesiod’s Works and Days.” In The Moral Authority of Nature, ed. Daston, L. and Vidal, F.. Chicago. 2549.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R., eds. 2006. City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1953. The Discovery of the Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought. Trans. T. Rosenmeyer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. 1980. “Poetry, Community & Climax.” In The Real Work: Interviews & Talks, 1964–1979, ed. McLean, W. S.. New York. 159–74.Google Scholar
Soja, E. 1989. Postmodern Geographies. The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London.Google Scholar
Soja, E. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Soper, K. 1995. What Is Nature? Culture, Politics and the Non-Human. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spurr, M. S. 1986. “Agriculture and the ‘Georgics.’Greece & Rome 33: 164–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, F. 1981. The Sense of Place. Boston.Google Scholar
Street, L.-G. 2013. “The Roots of It.” In The Ecopoetry Anthology, ed. Fisher Wirth, A. and Street, L.-G.. San Antonion, TX. xxxviixl.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1991. “Following Nature: A Study in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 173.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. 1972. Die Lyrik des Horaz: Eine Interpretation der Oden. I. Erstes und zweites Buch. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. 1973. Die Lyrik des Horaz. Eine Interpretation der Oden. II. Drittes und viertes Buch. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Tacoma, L. 2016. Moving Romans: Migration to Rome in the Principate. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. 2007. “Horace and Roman Literary History.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Cambridge. 6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telò, M. and Mueller, M., eds. 2018. The Materialities of Greek Tragedy: Objects and Affect in Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides. London.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. 2001. “The Old Man and his Garden (Verg. Georg. 4, 116–148).” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 47: 175–95.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. 2011. Playing the Farmer: Representations of Rural Life in Vergil’s Georgics. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thilo, G., ed. (1887). Servii Grammatici Qui Feruntur in Vergilii Bucolica et Georgica Commentarii. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1982. Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1983. “Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman Poetry.” Classical Quarterly 33: 92113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1987. “Prose into Poetry: Tradition and Meaning in Virgil’s Georgics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91: 229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1988a. Virgil: The Georgics Volume I, Books I–II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1988b. Virgil: The Georgics Volume II, Books III–IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1991. “The ‘Sacrifice’ at the End of the Georgics, Aristaeus, and Vergilian Closure.” Classical Philology 86: 211–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1992. “The Old Man Revisited: Memory, Reference, and Genre in Virg., Georg. 4, 116–48.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 29: 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F., ed. 2011. Horace: Odes Book IV and Carmen Saeculare. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thommen, L. 2012. An Environmental History of Ancient Greece and Rome. Trans. P. Hill. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissol, G. 2005. “Maimed Books and Maimed Authors: Tristia 1.7 and the Fate of the Metamorphoses.” In Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature: Essays Presented to William S. Anderson on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Batsone, W. and Tissol, G.. New York. 97112.Google Scholar
Tissol, G., ed. 2014. Ovid; Epistulae ex Ponto, Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tress, D. M. 1997. “The Philosophical Genesis of Ecology and Environmentalism.” In The Greeks and the Environment, ed. Westra, L. and Robinson, T. M.. Lanham, MD. 3342.Google Scholar
Troxler-Keller, I. 1964. Die Dichterlandschaft des Horaz. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. 2012. “Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species.” Environmental Humanities 1: 141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Y. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. [1974] 1990. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Uglione, R., ed. 1998. L’uomo antico e la natura. Turin.Google Scholar
Usher, M. D. 2020. Plato’s Pigs and Other Ruminations: Ancient Guides to Living with Nature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, J. H. 1970. “The Subject and His Landscape.” In Romanticism and Consciousness: Essays in Criticism, ed. Bloom, H.. New York. 5765.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. B. 1967. “The Unity of the Eclogues: Arcadian Forest, Theocritean Trees.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 98: 491508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Videau-Delibes, A. 1991. Les Tristes d’Ovide et l’élégie romain: Une poétique de la rupture. Paris.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2008. “Introduction: Scholarly Approaches to the Georgics since the 1970s.” In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Vergil’s Georgics, ed. Volk, K.. Oxford. 113.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2010. “Aratus.” In A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, ed. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Malden, MA. 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voros, G. 1997. Notations of the Wild: Ecology in the Poetry of Wallace Stevens. Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Walker, A. D. 1997. “Oedipal Narratives and the Exilic Ovid.” Ramus 26: 194204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination, and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Wendel, C., ed. 1914. Scholia in Theocritum Vetera. Leipzig.Google Scholar
West, D. 1967. Reading Horace. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
West, D. 1995. Horace Odes I: Carpe Diem. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, D. 1998. Horace Odes II: Vatis Amici. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, D. 2002. Horace Odes III: Dulce Periculum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Westling, L., ed. 2013. The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2010. “Thinking Local.” In Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World, ed. Whitmarsh, T.. Cambridge, 116.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1945. Horace and His Lyric Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1955. Ovid Recalled. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1966Virgil and the Evictions.” Hermes 94: 320–4.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1969. The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. London.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 2008. “Pindar and the Proem to the Third Georgic.” In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Vergil’s Georgics, ed. Volk, K.. Oxford. 182–8.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1994. Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid’s Exile Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2002a. “Ovid’s Exile Poetry: Tristia, Epistulae ex Ponto and Ibis.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. Hardie, P.. Cambridge, 233–45.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2002b. “Ovid’s Exilic Poetry: Worlds Apart.” In Brill’s Companion to Ovid, ed. Boyd, B. W.. Leiden. 337–81.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1973. The Country and the City. London.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1980. Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays. London.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York.Google Scholar
Winkler, K., Seifert, K., and Detering, H.. 2012. “Literary Studies and the Spatial Turn.” Journal of Literary Theory 6: 253270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 1976. “Virgil and the Confiscations.” Greece & Rome 23: 55–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witek, F. 2006. Vergils Landschaften. Zürich.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1972. “Horace’s Odes Diffugere nives and Solvitur acris hiems.” Latomus 31: 768–76.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1974. “Exegi monumentum: Horace, Odes 3.30.” In Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry, ed. Woodman, T. and West, D.. London. 115–28.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 2016. “Movers and Stayers.” In Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire, ed. de Ligt, L. and Tacoma, L.. Leiden. 438–61.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 2015. Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormell, D. E. W. 1971. “Apibus quanta experiential parcis: Virgil Georgics 4.1–227.” In Vergiliana: Recherches sur Virgile, ed. Bardon, H. and Verdière, R.. Leiden. 429–35.Google Scholar
Wright, J. R. G. 1983. “Virgil’s Pastoral Programme: Theocritus, Callimachus and Eclogue 1.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 29: 107–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. 1981. “Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 124: 297311.Google Scholar
Zapf, H., ed. 2016. Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. 2003. “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture.” In Myth, History, and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T.P. Wiseman, ed. Braund, D. and Gill, C.. Exeter. 119–38.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. 2019. “Natural Law and Natural Language in the First Century bce.” In Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World, ed. Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B.. Cambridge. 191211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Erik Pugh Fredericksen
  • Book: The Environmental Poetry of Augustan Rome
  • Online publication: 12 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009476157.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Erik Pugh Fredericksen
  • Book: The Environmental Poetry of Augustan Rome
  • Online publication: 12 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009476157.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Erik Pugh Fredericksen
  • Book: The Environmental Poetry of Augustan Rome
  • Online publication: 12 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009476157.009
Available formats
×