Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Approaching Kuruman
- 2 Goat People and Fish People on the Agro-Pastoral Frontier, c. 1750–1830
- 3 Intensification and Social Innovation on the Cape Frontier, 1820s–1884
- 4 Colonial Annexation: Land Alienation and Environmental Administration, 1884–1894
- 5 Environmental Trauma, Colonial Rule, and the Failure of Extensive Food Production, 1895–1903
- 6 The Environmental History of a “Labor Reservoir,” 1903–1970s
- 7 Apportioning Water, Dividing Land: Segregation, 1910–1977
- 8 Betterment and the Bophuthatswana Donkey Massacre: The Environmental Rights of Tribal Subjects, 1940s–1983
- 9 Retrospectives on Socio-Environmental History and Socio-Environmental Justice
- Appendix A South African Census Statistics on Human Population
- Appendix B South African Census Statistics on Stock Population
- Appendix C1 1991 Individual Interviews
- Appendix C2 1997–1998 Individual Interviews
- Appendix C3 1991 and 1997–1998 Group Interviews
- Appendix D A Note on Archival Sources
- Notes
- Index
4 - Colonial Annexation: Land Alienation and Environmental Administration, 1884–1894
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Approaching Kuruman
- 2 Goat People and Fish People on the Agro-Pastoral Frontier, c. 1750–1830
- 3 Intensification and Social Innovation on the Cape Frontier, 1820s–1884
- 4 Colonial Annexation: Land Alienation and Environmental Administration, 1884–1894
- 5 Environmental Trauma, Colonial Rule, and the Failure of Extensive Food Production, 1895–1903
- 6 The Environmental History of a “Labor Reservoir,” 1903–1970s
- 7 Apportioning Water, Dividing Land: Segregation, 1910–1977
- 8 Betterment and the Bophuthatswana Donkey Massacre: The Environmental Rights of Tribal Subjects, 1940s–1983
- 9 Retrospectives on Socio-Environmental History and Socio-Environmental Justice
- Appendix A South African Census Statistics on Human Population
- Appendix B South African Census Statistics on Stock Population
- Appendix C1 1991 Individual Interviews
- Appendix C2 1997–1998 Individual Interviews
- Appendix C3 1991 and 1997–1998 Group Interviews
- Appendix D A Note on Archival Sources
- Notes
- Index
Summary
Now you see the coming wave of white men. They seek land – they seek fountains. Where they find open country they will build and put in the plough and tell you that the unoccupied country is God's and not yours.
Although the Cape frontier did not bring a revolution to environmental and social relations, colonial rule did. It inserted a new group, whites, at the top of the power structure and on the land and imported a new tool, the modern state, with which to exercise their power. Yet, the revolutionary impact of colonial rule was delayed after its imposition in 1884. Extensive production continued much as it had for over a decade and the interventionist potential of the modern state became clear only in the twentieth century. Still, later disruptions had roots in the land alienation and environmental administration of the period immediately following annexation, and thus we now consider the portentous character of early colonial rule.
By considering the importance of land alienation and environmental administration, this chapter raises issues of comparative environmental history. In much comparative world environmental history, “colonialism” and “imperialism” have served as synonyms for white settlement. According to this view, European imperialism was “biological expansion” consisting of “people, plants and pathogens.” “Ecological imperialism,” as defined by Alfred Crosby, denotes demographic takeover in temperate zones.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environment, Power, and InjusticeA South African History, pp. 76 - 95Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003