Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:55:33.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Toward a Model of Innovation and Performance Along the Lines of Knight, Keynes, Hayek, and M. Polanyí

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Edmund S. Phelps
Edited by
Zoltan J. Acs ,
David B. Audretsch  and
Robert J. Strom
Edmund S. Phelps
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Zoltan J. Acs
Affiliation:
George Mason School of Public Policy, Fairfax
David B. Audretsch
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Robert J. Strom
Affiliation:
Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City
Get access

Summary

The Beginnings of Capitalism Theory

A student relying on secondary sources might surmise that the theory of capitalism's dynamism originates in the classical case for competitive markets – a case first made by Adam Smith two centuries ago. This classical thesis was that the presence of many buyers and sellers competing with one another in the marketplace caused wasteful resource allocations to be weeded out “as if by an invisible hand.” Under equilibrium conditions, efficiency in production prevailed. (One person's choice could be expanded only at the expense of another's.) This valuable feature of unimpeded markets, even if not fully realized, could not be matched by a government bureau: there were just too many goods and factors for a central planner to cope with. The point was made against communism by both “market socialism” theorists and capitalism theorists in the interwar years of the twentieth century.

Going farther, Ludwig von Mises, another of the early moderns (and also a champion of capitalism), argued in the early 1920s that market socialism, a new system then beginning to be envisioned, would also fail to match the efficiency of market economies under private ownership. If managers did not receive the profit and bear the risks of their decisions, the resource allocations of socialist competition would be highly inefficient – an argument that effectively founded property-rights theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Public Policy , pp. 35 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, Philippe, Howitt, Peter, and Mayer-Foulkes, David. 2005. “The Effect of Financial Development on Convergence [of the Productivity Growth Rate]: Theory and Evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 173–223.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. 2002. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhidé, Amar V. 2000. The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassel, Gustav. 1924. Theory of the Social Economy. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 622.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert, L. 1979. What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, Roman, and Goldberg, Michael. 2007. Imperfect Knowledge Economics: Exchange Rates and Risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, Roman, Hessel, Marek, and Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 2000. “Why Ownership Matters: Entrepreneurship and the Restructuring of Enterprises in Central Europe.”C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics. New York University, Working Paper 00–03.Google Scholar
Hansen, Alvin. 1951. Business Cycles and National Income. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935a. Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. London: George Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935b. “Socialist Calculation II: The State of the Debate.” In Collectivist Economic Planning. London: George Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1961. “The Non Sequitur of the Dependence Effect.” Southern Economic Journal, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1978. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Jestaz, David. 2005. “Reflexions sur le modele francais.” Manuscript, Alliance Program, Columbia University, July.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M. 1937. “The General Theory of Employment.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Gary. 1998., Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 19–20.Google Scholar
Ludwig Edler, Mises. 1936. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Marschak, Thomas. 1962. “Flexibility, Uncertainty and Economic Theory.” Metroeconomica, 14, 42–58.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Phelps, Edmund S.. 1966. “Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review, 56(1–2) 69–75.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Winter, Sidney. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in Politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 1985. Political Economy: An Introductory Text. Norton.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 1999. “Lessons from the Corporatist Crisis in Some Asian Nations.” Journal of Policy Modeling, 21(3), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 2000. “Europe's Stony Grounds for the Seeds of Growth.” Financial Times, August 9, 2000.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 2002. Enterprise and Inclusion in Italy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 2006. “The Continent's High Unemployment: Possible Institutional Causes and Some Evidence,” Keynote Lecture, Conference on Unemployment in Europe, CESifo. In Werding, Martin (ed.), Structural Unemployment in Western Europe: Reasons and Remedies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 53–74.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 2007. “The Economic Performance of Nations: Prosperity Depends on Dynamism, Dynamism on Institutions.” Conference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and the Growth Mechanism of the Free-Market Economies, November 2003. In Sheshinski, Eytan, ed., The Growth Mechanism of Free Enterprise Economies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S., and Zoega, Gylfie. 1994. “Searching for Routes to Better Economic Performance.” Forum, CESifo.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S., and Zoega, Gylfie. 1997. “The Rise and Downward Trend of the Unemployment Rate in the U.S.” American Economic Review, 87(2), 283–289.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S., and Zoega, Gylfie. 1998. “Natural-Rate Theory and OECD Unemployment.” The Economic Journal, 108(448), 782–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S., and Zoega, Gylfie. 2001. “Structural Booms.” Economic Policy, 16(32), 83–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyí, Michael. 1962. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934 (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spiethoff, Arthur. 1903. Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1994. Whither Socialism?Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin. 1982. English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×