Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:46:14.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

Juan A. Bogliaccini
Juan A. Bogliaccini
Affiliation:
Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Empowering Labor
Leftist Approaches to Wage Policy in Unequal Democracies
 , pp. 187 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afonso, Alexandre. 2013. Social Concertation in Times of Austerity: European Integration and the Politics of Labour Market Governance in Austria and Switzerland. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Alegre, Pablo, and Filgueira, Fernando. 2009. “Assessment of a Hybrid Reform Path: Social and Labour Policies in Uruguay, 1985–2005.” International Labour Review 148(3): 317–34.Google Scholar
Alexander, Robert Jackson, and Parker, Eldon M.. 2005. A History of Organized Labor in Uruguay and Paraguay. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Alonso Eloy, Rosa, and Demasi, Carlos. 1986. Uruguay 1958–1968: Crisis y Estancamiento. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Alvez, Guillermo, Amarante, Verónica, Salas, Gonzalo, and Vigorito, Andrea. 2012. La Desigualdad Del Ingreso En Uruguay Entre 1986 y 2009. Montevideo, Uruguay: Universidad de la República (UdelaR).Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno. 2005. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno. 2016. “The Political Economy of the Neoliberal Transformation of French Industrial Relations.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 69(3): 523–50.Google Scholar
Angell, Alan. 1974. Partidos Políticos y Movimiento Obrero En Chile. Mexico DF: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago. 2016. “Democratizing Democracy? Civil Society and Party Organization in Bolivia.” Comparative Politics 48(4): 459–78.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago. 2018. When Movements Become Parties: The Bolivian MAS in Comparative Perspective. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago, and Bogliaccini, Juan. 2022. “Empowering Inclusion? The Two Sides of Party-Society Linkages in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 57: 410–32.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago, and Cyr, Jennifer. 2017. “Inside Revolutionary Parties: Coalition-Building and Maintenance in Reformist Bolivia.” Comparative Political Studies 50(9): 1255–87.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago, and Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2016. “Social Movements and Social Policy: The Bolivian Renta Dignidad.” Studies in Comparative International Development 51: 308–27.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Konisky, David M.. 2006. “The Introduction of Voter Registration and Its Effect on Turnout.” Political Analysis 14(1): 83–100.Google Scholar
Arriagada, Genaro. 2004. Los Empresarios y La Política. Santiago de Chile: Editorial LOM.Google Scholar
Arriagada, Irma. 2004. “Estructuras Familiares, Trabajo y Bienestar En América Latina.” In Cambio de Las Familias En El Marco de Las Transformaciones Globales: Necesidad de Políticas Públicas Eficaces, eds. Arriagada, Irma, and Aranda, Verónica. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL – SERIE Seminarios y conferencias N42, 43–74.Google Scholar
Assembleia da República. 2003. “Presentation of Social Partners to the General Assembly.” [Video Transcript] 15th January 2003.Google Scholar
Avdagic, Sabina. 2010. “When Are Concerted Reforms Feasible? Explaining the Emergence of Social Pacts in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 43(5): 628–57.Google Scholar
Avdagic, Sabina, Rhodes, Martin, and Visser, Jelle. 2011. Social Pacts in Europe: Emergence, Evolution, and Institutionalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, Benassi, Chiara, and Meardi, Guglielmo. 2019. “Theoretical and Empirical Links between Trade Unions and Democracy.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 40(1): 3–19.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, and Hoon Lim, Sang. 2007. “Social Pacts as Coalitions of the Weak and Moderate: Ireland, Italy and South Korea in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 13(1): 27–46.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, and Howell, Chris. 2017. Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations since the 1970s. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2016. “Rethinking Comparative Political Economy: The Growth Model Perspective.” Politics and Society 44(2): 175–207.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, and Simoni, Marco. 2008. “Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice.” Comparative Political Studies 41(10): 1323–48.Google Scholar
Baer, Werner, and Leite, António P. N.. 1992. “The Peripheral Economy, Its Performance in Isolation and with Integration: The Case of Portugal.” Luso-Brazilian Review 29(2): 1–43.Google Scholar
Baiôa, Manuel Pimenta Morgado, Fernandes, Paulo Jorge, and Ribeiro de Meneses, Filipe. 2003. “The Political History of Twentieth-Century Portugal.” Historia y Política: Ideas, procesos y movimientos sociales 7: 11–54.Google Scholar
Baklanoff, Eric N. 1992. “The Political Economy of Portugal’s Later ‘Estado Novo’: A Critique of the Stagnation Thesis.” Luso-Brazilian Review 29(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Baland, Jean Marie, and Robinson, James A.. 2008. “Land and Power: Theory and Evidence from Chile.” American Economic Review 98(5): 1737–65.Google Scholar
Barran, Jose P., and Nahum, Benjamin. 1984. Batlle, Los Estancieros y El Imperio Britanico. Montevideo: Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Barrán, José Pedro. 2004. Los Conservadores Uruguayos, 1870–1933. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Barreto, José. 1990. “Os Primórdios Da Intersindical Sob Marcelo Caetano.” Análise Social 25(105/106): 57–117.Google Scholar
Barreto, José. 2000. “Os Sindicatos Nacionais Do Estado Novo.” In Dicionário de História de Portugal – Suplemento, eds. Barreto, António, and Mónica, Filomena. Porto, Figueirinhas: Suplemento, Vol. IX, 436–45.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt A., Nuo, Stephen A., and Sanchez, Gabriel R.. 2009. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate New Evidence from Indiana.” PS – Political Science and Politics 42(1) 111–16.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pederson, Rasmus Brun. 2016. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bentancur, Verónica Pérez, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2019. How Party Activism Survives: Uruguay’s Frente Amplio. Padstow, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benza, Gabriela, and Kessler, Gabriel. 2020. La ¿nueva? Estructura Social de América Latina: Cambios y Persistencias Después de La Ola de Gobiernos Progresistas. Buenos Aires: Siglo, XX.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, and Cusack, Thomas R.. 2009. “Diverse Disparities: The Politics and Economics of Wage, Market, and Disposable Income Inequalities.” Political Research Quarterly 62(2): 257–75.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, and Rueda, David. 2014. “Inequality and Institutions: The Case of Economic Coordination.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 251–71.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 1987. “Redemocratization and Transition Elections: A Comparison of Spain and Portugal.” Comparative Politics 19(2): 213–31.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 1993. “A Comment on Economic Liberalization in Portugal and Spain.” In The Political Economy of Policy Reform, ed. Williamson, John. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 197–206.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 1999. “What’s Working in Southern Europe?” South European Society and Politics 4(3): 263–87.Google Scholar
Bitar, Sergio. 1995. Chile 1970–1973: Asumir La Historia Para Construir El Futuro. Santiago de Chile: Pehuén.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier, and Portugal, Pedro. 2001. “What Hides behind an Unemployment Rate: Comparing Portuguese and U.S. Labor Markets.” American Economic Review 91(1): 187–207.Google Scholar
Blatter, Joachim, and Haverland, Markus. 2012. “Two or Three Approaches to Explanatory Case Study Research?” APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A. 2012. “Small Latecomers into the Global Market Power Conflict and Institutional Change in Chile and Uruguay.” ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A. 2013. “Trade Liberalization, Deindustrialization, and Inequality: Evidence from Middle-Income Latin American Countries.” Latin American Research Review 48(2): 79–105.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A. 2019. “The Reconstruction of Business Interests after the ISI Collapse: Unpacking the Effect of Institutional Change in Chile and Uruguay.” Third World Quarterly 40(7): 1378–93.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A. 2020. “The Technocratic Barrier to Wage Policy: Theoretical Insights from the Chilean Concertación.” Third World Quarterly 42(4): 831–54.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A., and Filgueira, Fernando. 2011. “Capitalism in the Southern Cone of Latin America after the End of the Washington Consensus: Notes without Score?” Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia 51: 45+.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A., Geymonat, Juan, and Opertti, Martin. 2020. “Big Business and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in Uruguay: A Network-Based Story of Policy Infiltration for Self-Preservation.” In Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression, eds. Basualdo, Victoria, Berghoff, Hartmut, Bucheli, Marcelo, and Grieger, Manfred. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 127–56.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A., and Madariaga, Aldo. 2020. “Varieties of Skills Profiles in Latin America: A Reassessment of the Hierarchical Model of Capitalism.” Journal of Latin American Studies 52(3): 601–31.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A., Monestier, Felipe, and Rossel, Cecilia. 2021. “The Origins of Wage Councils in Uruguay: A Process-Tracing Analysis.” SASE Conference: Río de Janeiro, Brasil. In REPAL Annual Meeting, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A., and Queirolo, Rosario. 2017. “Uruguay 2016: Parliamentary Majority under Risk and Challenges to Sustain the Model.” Revista de Ciencia Politica 37(2): 589–612.Google Scholar
Bosco, Anna. 2001. “Four Actors in Search of a Role: The Southern European Communist Parties.” In Parties, Politics, and Democracy in the New Southern Europe, eds. Gunther, Richard, and Diamandouros, Nikiforos P.. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 329–87.Google Scholar
Boylan, Delia M. 1996. “Taxation and Transition: The Politics of the 1990 Chilean Tax Reform.” Latin American Research Review 31(1): 7–31.Google Scholar
Bozio, A. et al. 2020. Predistribution vs. Redistribution: Evidence from France and the U.S. Working Papers 2020–24. London: Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
Bradley, David et al. 2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics 55(2): 193–228.Google Scholar
Brancaccio, Emiliano, Garbellini, Nadia, and Giammetti, Raffaele. 2018. “Structural Labour Market Reforms, GDP Growth and the Functional Distribution of Income.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 44: 34–45.Google Scholar
Branco, Rui. 2017. “Review of Sara Watson, The Left Divided. The Development and Transformation of Advanced Welfare States.” Análise Social 222(LII(1)): 204–14.Google Scholar
Branco, Rui, and Costa, Edna. 2019. “The Golden Age of Tax Expenditures: Fiscal Welfare and Inequality in Portugal (1989–2011).” New Political Economy 24(6): 780–97.Google Scholar
Brandl, Bernd, and Traxler, Franz. 2005. “Industrial Relations, Social Pacts and Welfare Expenditures: A Cross-National Comparison.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 43(4): 635–58.Google Scholar
Bremer, Björn. 2018. “The Missing Left? Economic Crisis and the Programmatic Response of Social Democratic Parties in Europe.” Party Politics 24(1): 23–38.Google Scholar
Bremer, Björn. 2023. Austerity from the Left: Social Democratic Parties in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bremer, Björn, and McDaniel, Sean. 2019. “The Ideational Foundations of Social Democratic Austerity in the Context of the Great Recession.” Socio-Economic Review 18(2): 439–63.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Levitsky, Steven, and Victoria Murillo, María. 2020. “The Political Origins of Institutional Weakness.” In The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America, eds. Brinks, Daniel M., Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–40.Google Scholar
Brito, Mónica, and da Silva, Filipe Carreira. 2010. O Momento Constituinte: Os Idreitos Sociais Na Constituçao. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sarah. 2009. Social Protection and the Market in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sarah M. 2001. “What Was the Role of International Financial Institutions in the Diffusion of Social Security Reform in Latin America?” In Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform, ed. Weyland, Kurt. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 53–80.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas, and Macleod, Alex. 1986. Parties in Contemporary Portugal: Parties and the Consolidation of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Von Bülow, Marisa, and Ponte, Germán Bidegain. 2015. “It Takes Two to Tango: Students, Political Parties, and Protest in Chile (2005–2013).” In Handbook of Social Movements across Latin America, eds. Almeida, Paul, and Ulate, Allen Cordero. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 179–94.Google Scholar
Burgess, Katrina. 2010. “Global Pressures, National Policies, and Labor Rights in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 45(2): 198–224.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R. 2014. Skills and Inequality: Partisan Politics and the Political Economy of Education Reforms in Western Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Iversen, Torben. 2012. “Collective Skill Systems, Wage Bargaining, and Labor Market Stratification.” In The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation. New York: Oxford University Press, 205–33.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Trampusch, Christine. 2012. The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caetano, Gerardo. 1984. El Asedio Conservador (1925–1929) Tomo I. Montevideo: Centro Latinoamericano de Economía Humana (CLAEH).Google Scholar
Caetano, Gerardo, and Jacob, Raul. 1987. Economía y Política En El Uruguay Del Centenario (De Espaldas Al Precipicio). Montevideo: Universidad de la Republica.Google Scholar
Cahuc, Pierre, and Malherbet, Franck. 2004. “Unemployment Compensation Finance and Labor Market Rigidity.” Journal of Public Economics 88(3–4): 481–501.Google Scholar
Cahuc, Pierre, Marque, Francois, and Wasmer, Etienne. 2008. “A Theory of Wages and Labor Demand with Intra-Firm Bargaining and Matching Frictions.” International Economic Review 49(3): 943–72.Google Scholar
Cahuc, Pierre, and Postel-Vinay, Fabien. 2002. “Temporary Jobs, Employment Protection and Labor Market Performance.” Labour Economics 9(1): 63–91.Google Scholar
Calmfors, Lars. 1987. “Efficiency and Equality in Swedish Labour Markets: Comment to Flanagan.” In The Swedish Economy, eds. Bosworth, Barry, and Rivlin, Alice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 174–80.Google Scholar
Calmfors, Lars, and Driffill, John. 1988. “Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance.” Economic Policy 3(6): 14–61. www.jstor.org/stable/1344503%5Cn www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/1344503.pdf?acceptTC=true.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. 2021. “Pathways to Inclusion in Latin America.” In The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies, eds. Kapiszewski, Diana, Levitsky, Steven, and Yashar, Deborah. London: Cambridge University Press, 401–33.Google Scholar
Campero, Guillermo. 2007. “No 37 Serie Estudios Socio/Económicos La Economía Política de Las Relaciones Laborales 1990–2006.” Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
Campos Lima, Maria da Paz. 2019. “Portugal: Reforms and the Turn to Neoliberal Austerity.” In Collective Bargaining in Europe: Towards an Endgame, eds. Müller, Torsten, Vandaele, Kurt, and Waddington, Jeremy. Brussels: ETUI-REHS, 483–504.Google Scholar
Lima, Campos, Paz, Maria da, and Naumann, Reinhard. 2000. “Social Pacts in Portugal: From Comprehensive Policy Programmes to the Negotiation of Concrete Industrial Relations Reforms?” In Social Pacts in Europe New Dynamics, eds. Giuseppe Fajertag, and Philippe Pochet. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, 321–42.Google Scholar
Lima, Campos, Paz, Maria da, and Naumann, Reinhard. 2011. “Portugal: From Broad Strategic Pacts to Policy-Specific Agreements.” In Social Pacts in Europe Emergence, Evolution, and Institutionalization, eds. Sabina Avdagic, Martin Rhodes, and Jelle Visser. Oxford: Oxford Academic, 147–73.Google Scholar
Candia, Julio César González, and Portugal Campillay, Miguel. 2018. “Reforma Laboral Chilena,¿ Un Avance Concreto Para El Sindicalismo o Una Continuación Renovada Del Plan Laboral Impuesto Por La Dictadura Militar?” Revista Pilquen. Sección Ciencias Sociales 21(4): 32–42.Google Scholar
Card, David, and Rute Cardoso, Ana. 2022. “Wage Flexibility under Sectoral Bargaining.” Journal of the European Economic Association 20(5): 2013–61.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Daniel, and Branco, Rui. 2017. “Labour Market Reforms and the Crisis in Portugal: No Change, U-Turn or New Departure?” IPRI Working Paper N.56/2017.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Daniel, 2018. “Liberalised Dualisation. Labour Market Reforms and the Crisis in Portugal: A New Departure.” European Journal of Social Security, 20(1): 31–48.Google Scholar
Carnes, Matthew E. 2015. “Conclusion: Politics and Labor Regulation in Latin America.” In Continuity Despite Change: The Politics of Labor Regulation in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 191–200.Google Scholar
Carriére, Jean, Haworth, Nigel, and Roddick, Jacqueline. 1989. The State, Industrial Relations and the Labour Movement in Latin America (Vol.1). London: The Macmillan Press LTD.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge G. 2006. “Latin America’s Left Turn.” Foreign Affairs 85(3): 28–43.Google Scholar
Castedo, Leopoldo. 2001. Chile, Vida y Muerte de La República Parlamentaria: De Balmaceda a Alessandri. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, Rossana. 2005. The Politics of Social Policy Change in Chile and Uruguay: Retrenchment versus Maintenance 1973–1998. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 1975. “The Government and the Industrial Bourgeoisie in Chile 1938–1964.” Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel Angel. 1993. “The New Leviathan: The Dynamics and Limits of Technocracy.” Theory and Society 22(3): 307–35.Google Scholar
Clifton, Judith, Comín, Francisco, and Díaz Fuentes, Daniel. 2005. “‘Empowering Europe’s Citizen’: Towards a Charter for Services General Interest.” Public Management Review 7(3): 417–43.Google Scholar
Código do Trabalho. 2003. “Lei N.o 99/2003.” https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/632906/details/normal?p_p_auth=bV0tgyeX.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald Alan. 2000. If You Are an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Berkeley, CA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conselho Económico e Social. 1996. “Acordo De Concertação Estratégica 1996/1999.”Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena. 2007. Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America: Between Flexibility and Rights. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena, and Bazler, Joseph C. 2013. “Bringing Unions Back in: Labour and Left Governments in Latin America.”Google Scholar
Correio da Manhã, . 2002. “É Preciso Acabar Com a Concertação Social.”Google Scholar
Costa Pinto, António. 2000. “Portugal: Crisis and Early Authoritarian Takeover.” In Conditions of Democracy in Europe, 1919–39, eds. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and Mitchell, Jerermy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 354–80.Google Scholar
Costa Pinto, António. 2003. “Twentieth-Century Portugal: An Introduction.” In Contemporary Portugal: Politics, Society and Culture, ed. Pinto, António Costa. New York: Columbia University Press, 1–46.Google Scholar
Costa Pinto, António. 2008. “Political Purges and State Crisis in Portugal’s Transition to Democracy, 1975–76.” Journal of Contemporary History 43(2): 305–32.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 1993. Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas R., and Beramendi, Pablo. 2006. “Taxing Work.” European Journal of Political Research 45(1): 47–73.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2014. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus. 2013. The Great Escape. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Decreto-Lei 79-A/89. 1989. “Decreto-Lei 79-A/89. Diário Da República n.o 60/1989, 1o Suplemento, Série I de 1989-03-13.” https://dre.tretas.org/dre/23127/decreto-lei-79-A-89-de-13-de-marco.Google Scholar
Decreto-Lei n.o 353-H/77. 1977. “Decreto-Lei n.o 353-H/77. Diário Da República n.o 199/1977, 2o Suplemento, Série I de 1977-08-29.” https://dre.pt/pesquisa/-/search/240853/details/normal?jp=true/en.Google Scholar
Decreto-Lei n.o 398/83. 1983. “Decreto-Lei n.o 398/83. Diário Da República n.o 252/1983, Série I de 1983-11-02.” https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa-avancada/-/asearch/443683/details/normal?types=SERIEI&search=Pesquisar&numero=398%2F83&tipo=Decreto-Lei.Google Scholar
Decreto-Lei n.o 781/76. 1976. “Decreto-Lei n.o 781/76. Diário Da República n.o 253/1976, Série I de 1976-10-28.” https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/409341/details/maximized?filterEnd=1976-12-31&filterStart=1976-01-01&q=1976&perPage=100&fqs=1976.Google Scholar
Decreto-Lei n.o 841-C/76. 1976. “Decreto-Lei n.o 841-C/76. Diário Da República n.o 285/1976, 1o Suplemento, Série I de 1976-12-07.” https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/558991/details/maximized?perPage=50&sort=whenSearchable&q=Constituição+da+República+Portuguesa&sortOrder=ASC.Google Scholar
Decreto-Lei n.o 90/2012. 2012. “Decreto-Lei n.o 90/2012. Diário Da República n.o 72/2012, Série I de 2012-04-11.” https://dre.pt/pesquisa/-/search/552548/details/maximized.Google Scholar
Demasi, Carlos. 2016. “El Apoyo de Las Cámaras Empresariales.” In El Negocio Del Terrorismo de Estado: Los Cómplices Económicos de La Dictadura Uruguaya, ed. Bohoslavsky, Juan Pablo. Montevideo: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.Google Scholar
DeShazo, Peter. 1983. Urban Workers and Labor Unions in Chile, 1902–1927. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
DGERT. 2020. “Direção-Geral Do Emprego e Das Relações de Trabalho.” Data on Collective Relations. www.dgert.gov.pt (September 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Doglio, Natalia, Senatore, Luis, and Yaffé, Jaime. 2004. “Izquierda Política y Sindicatos En Uruguay (1971–2003).” In La Izquierda Uruguaya: En La Oposición y El Gobierno, ed. Lanzaro, Jorge. Montevideo: Editorial Fin de Siglo, 251–96.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard F., and Ross Schneider, Ben. 2016. “The Middle-Income Trap: More Politics than Economics.” World Politics 68(4): 608–44.Google Scholar
Dornelas, Antonio. 2003. “Industrial Relations in Portugal: Continuity or Controlled Change?” In Portugal: Strategic Options in a European Context, eds. Monteiro, Fátima, Tavares, José, Glatzer, Miguel, and Cardoso, Ángelo. Maryland: Lexington Books, 129–51.Google Scholar
Dornelas, Antonio. 2010. “Social Pacts in Portugal: Still Uneven?” In After the Euro and Enlargement: Social Pacts in the EU, eds. Pochet, Philippe, Keune, Maarten, and Natali, David. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, 109–36.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. “Globalization and Policy Convergence.” International Studies Review 3(1): 53–78.Google Scholar
Dube, Arindrajit. 2019a. Impacts of Minimum Wages: Review of the International Evidence. London: UK Government.Google Scholar
Dube, Arindrajit. 2019b. “Minimum Wages and the Distribution of Family Incomes.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11(4): 268–304.Google Scholar
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 2012. Social Panorama of Latin America. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alberto. 1928. La Fronda Aristocrática En Chile. Santiago de Chile: Imprenta Nacional.Google Scholar
Edwards, Pearce. 2022. “Political Competition and Authoritarian Repression.” World Politics 74(4): 479–522.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick, Hausermann, Silja, Palier, Bruno, and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin. 2012. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erixon, Lennart. 2010. “The Rehn-Meidner Model in Sweden: Its Rise, Challenges and Survival.” Journal of Economic Issues 44(3): 677–715.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Great Britain: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta, and Korpi, Walter. 1985. Social Policy as Class Politics in Post-War Capitalism: Scandinavia, Austria, and Germany. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta, 1986. “From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States: The Development of Scandinavian Social Policy.” International Journal of Sociology 16(3/4): 39–74.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2001. “Constructing Reform Coalitions: The Politics of Compensations in Argentina’s Economic Liberalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 43(3): 1–35.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2008. “Repression, Exclusion, and Inclusion: Government-Union Relations and Patterns of Labor Reform in Liberalizing Economies.” Comparative Politics 36: 273–90.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2011. Models of Economic Liberalization: Business, Workers, and Compensation in Latin America, Spain and Portugal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2019. “The Rise of Segmented Neo-Corporatism in South America: Wage Coordination in Argentina and Uruguay (2005–2015).” Comparative Political Studies 52(10): 1427–2465.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián, and Berins Collier, Ruth. 2007. “Down but Not out: Union Resurgence and Segmented Neocorporatism in Argentina (2003–2007).” Politics and Society 35(3): 363–401.Google Scholar
Fábrega, Jorge, González, Jorge, and Lindh, Jaime. 2018. “Polarization and Electoral Incentives: The End of the Chilean Consensus Democracy, 1990–2014.” Latin American Politics and Society 60(4): 49–68.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldmann, Andreas, and Luna, Juan. 2023. Criminal Politics and Botched Development in Contemporary Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Tiago, and Branco, Rui. 2017. “Long-Term Effects: Social Revolution and Civil Society in Portugal, 1974–2010.” Comparative politics 49(3): 411–31.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. 2005. Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Carlos. 1988. “Concertación Salarial y Gremios Empresariales En Uruguay.” In Política Económica y Actores Sociales, ed. Silva, Patricio. Buenos Aires: PREALC, 473–509.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Carlos, and Filgueira, Fernando. 2002. “Models of Welfare and Models of Capitalism: The Limits of Transferability.” In Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America, ed. Huber, Evelyne. Santiago, Chile: Penn State Press, 127–58.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Fernando, Reygadas, Luis, Pablo Luna, Juan, and Alegre, Pablo. 2012. “Crisis de Incorporación En América Latina: Límites de La Modernización Conservadora.” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 20(40): 7–34.Google Scholar
Fishman, Robert M. 1990a. “Rethinking State and Regime: Southern Europe’s Transition to Democracy.” World Politics 42(3): 422–40.Google Scholar
Fishman, Robert M. 1990b. Working-Class Organization and the Return to Democracy in Spain. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Robert M. 2011. “Democratic Practice after the Revolution: The Case of Portugal and Beyond.” Politics and Society 39(2): 233–67.Google Scholar
Fishman, Robert M. 2019. Democratic Practice: Origins of the Iberian Divide in Political Inclusion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Robert M. 2017. “How Civil Society Matters in Democratization: Setting the Boundaries of Post-Transition Political Inclusion.” Comparative Politics 49(3): 391–409.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, Timo, and Christine Lee, Soohyun. 2017. “Democratization, Post-Industrialization, and East Asian Welfare Capitalism: The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.” Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 33(1): 36–54.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, Lehmbruch, Gerhard, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Flores-Macías, Gustavo A. 2010. “Statist vs. Pro-Market: Explaining Leftist Governments’ Economic Policies in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 42(4): 413–33.Google Scholar
Flores-Macías, Gustavo A. 2012. After Neoliberalism?: The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Volker. 2002. “The Elusive Goal in Democratic Chile: Reforming the Pinochet Labor Legislation.” Latin American Politics and Society 44(1): 35–68.Google Scholar
Frank, Volker. 2004. “Politics without Policy: The Failure of Social Concertation in Democratic Chile, 1990–2000.” In Victims of the Chilean Miracle: Workers and Neoliberalism in the Pinochet Era, 1973–2002, ed. Winn, Peter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 71–124.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 1999. “Partidos y Coaliciones En El Chile de Los 90. Entre Pactos y Proyectos.” In El Modelo Chileno, ed. Drake, Paul, and Jaksic, Ivan. Santiago: LOM Ediciones, 191–222.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Ricardo, and Morales, Mauricio. 2015. “Deciding on the Electoral System: Chile’s Adoption of Proportional Representation in 1925.” Latin American Politics and Society 57(2): 41–66.Google Scholar
Gamboa Valenzuela, Ricardo. 2011. “Changing Electoral Rules: The Australian Ballot and Electoral Pacts in Chile (1958–1962).” Revista de Ciencia Politica 31(2): 159–86.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Lange, Peter. 1995. “Internationalization, Institutions, and Political Change.” International Organization 49(4): 627–65.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, Jordana, Jacint, and Levi-Faur, David. 2006. “Regulation in the Age of Globalization: The Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies across Europe and Latin America.” In Privatization and Market Development: Global Movements in Public Policy Ideas, ed. Hodge, Graeme. Cornwall: Edward Elgar Publishing, 127–47.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H. 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
González, Luis E. 1993. Estructuras Políticas y Democracia En Uruguay. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria. Instituto de Ciencia Política.Google Scholar
González, Luis E. 1999. “Los Partidos Establecidos y Sus Desafiantes.” In Los Partidos Políticos Uruguayos En Tiempo de Cambio, eds. González, Luis E., Monestier, Felipe, Queirolo, Rosario, and Rico, Mariana Sotelo. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 19–30.Google Scholar
González, Luis E. 1991. Political Structures and Democracy in Uruguay. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Grau, Nicolas, and Landerretche, Oscar. 2011. The Labor Impact of Minimum Wages: A Method for Estimating the Effect in Emerging Economies Using Chilean Panel Data. Santiago de Chile: University of Chile.Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry J, Wallace, Michael E, and Rubin, Beth A. 1986. “Capitalist Resistance to the Organization of Labor before the New Deal: Why? How? Success?” American Sociological Review 51(2): 147–67.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob. 2011. “The Institutional Foundations of Middle-Class Democracy.” Policy Network 6: 33–7.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics and Society 38(2): 152–204.Google Scholar
Haindl, Erik. 2007. Chile y Su Desarrollo Económico En El Siglo XX. Editorial Andrés Bello. Santiago de Chile: Independently published.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2002. “The Comparative Political Economy of the ‘Third Way’.” In The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the 21st Century, ed. Schmidtke, Oliver. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 31–58.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, eds. Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. Oxford University Press, 1–70.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark, and Wehner, Joachim. 2018. “When Do You Get Economists as Policy Makers?” British Journal of Political Science 50(3): 1193–205.Google Scholar
Hancké, Bob, Rhodes, Martin, and Thatcher, Mark. 2007. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Robert. 1978. Portugal: Birth of a Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hassel, Anke. 2014. “Adjustments in the Eurozone: Varieties of Capitalism and the Crisis in Southern Europe.” LEQS Paper (76).Google Scholar
Hayman, Richard. 1975. Industrial Relations. A Marxist Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hijzen, Alexander, and Martins, Pedro S.. 2016. No Extension without Representation? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Collective Bargaining. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Hijzen, Alexander, Martins, Pedro S., and Parlevliet, Jante. 2017. Collective Bargaining through the Magnifying Glass: A Comparison between the Netherlands and Portugal. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne. 2003. Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, 2002. “Globalisation, Competitiveness, and the Social Democratic Model.” Social Policy and Society 1(1): 47–57.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century (Vol. 4). Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
IMF. 2020. “Fiscal Monitor.”Google Scholar
INE. 2020. “Instituto Nacional de Estadística.” Data on Salaries and Prices. www.ine.gub.uy/precios-y-salarios.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. “New Macroeconomics and Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 425–53. www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.072004.085858.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy.” World Politics 50(4): 507–46.Google Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo. 2011. “The Politics of Technopols: Resources, Political Competence and Collective Leadership in Chile, 1990–2010.” Journal of Latin American Studies 43(3): 517–46.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51(2): 296–312.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. “A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality.” American Psychologist 58(9): 679–720.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Vanessa. 2011. En Vez de Una Sola Mirada. Santiago de Chile: RIL Editores.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, Levitsky, Steven, and Yashar, Deborah J.. 2021. “Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America.” In The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies, eds. Kapiszewski, Diana, Levitsky, Steven, and Yashar, Deborah J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–56.Google Scholar
Katrougalos, George, and Lazaridis, Gabriella. 2003. “Southern European Welfare States: Problems, Challenges and Prospects.” Challenges.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke, Cubbison, William, and White, Ismail. 2021. “Suppressing Black Votes: A Historical Case Study of Voting Restrictions in Louisiana.” American Political Science Review 115(2): 694–700.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark. 1983. The Future of Industrial Societies: Covergence or Continuing Diversity? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kharas, Homi, and Kohli, Harinder. 2011. “What Is the Middle Income Trap, Why Do Countries Fall into It, and How Can It Be Avoided?” Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 3(3): 281–89.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6): 845–79.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk A., Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D.. 1999. Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1978. The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions and Politics in Sweden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 2003. “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95.” American Political Science Review 97(3): 425–46.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1960. “Economic Growth of Small Nations.” In Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations, ed. Robinson, Edward. London: Springer, 14–32.Google Scholar
Lanza, Federico. 2013. “Factores Endógenos y Exógenos En La Crisis Del PCU (1989–1992).”Google Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 1986. Sindicatos y Sistema Político: Relaciones Corporativas En El Uruguay, 1940–1985. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 1993. “La ‘Doble Transición’ En El Uruguay. Gobierno de Partidos y Neo-Presidencialismo.” Nueva Sociedad 128: 132–47.Google Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 2004. “Fundamentos de La Democracia Pluralista y Estructura Política Del Estado En El Uruguay.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 14: 103–35.Google Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 2011. “Izquierdas y Derechas Gobernantes En América Latina.” https://forum.lasaweb.org/files/vol42-issue3/Debates1.pdf.Google Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 2013. “Continuidad y Cambios En Una Vieja Democracia de Partidos: Uruguay (1910–2010).” Opiniao pública 19 (2): 235–69.Google Scholar
Law 19759 History of the Law. 2001. “Law 19759, History of the Law.” www.bcn.cl/.Google Scholar
Lei n.o 99/2003. 2003. “Lei n.o 99/2003.” https://dre.pt/pesquisa/-/search/632906/details/normal?q=Lei+n.o99%2F2003%2Cde+27+de+agosto.Google Scholar
Leonardi, Marco, and Pica, Giovanni. 2007. “Employment Protection Legislation and Wages.” Working Paper Series 778. European Central Bank.Google Scholar
Leonardi, Marco, 2013. “Who Pays for It? The Heterogeneous Wage Effects of Employment Protection Legislation.” Economic Journal 123: 1236–73.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth M.. 2011. “Latin America’s ‘Left Turn’: A Framework for Analysis.” In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, eds. Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth M.. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21(2): 207–25.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 2017. “Toward Consolidated Democracies.” In The Politics of the Postcommunist World, eds. White, Stephen, and Nelson, Daniel N.. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 503–22.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, eds. Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. New York: The Free Press, 1–64.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Stewart. 2001. “Portugal‘s History since 1974.” ISCTE–Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa (Lisbon). www1.ci.uc.pt/cd25a/media/Textos/portugal-since-1974.pdf (accessed December 15, 2010).Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Stewart. 2002. “The 1999 Parliamentary Elections and 2001 Presidential Elections in Portugal.” Electoral Studies 21(1): 114–22.Google Scholar
Louçã, Francisco, Teixeira Lopes, João, and Costa, Jorge. 2014. Os Burgueses. Lisbon: Bertrand Editora.Google Scholar
Lucena, Manuel de. 1976. A Evolução Do Sistema Corporativo Português: O Salazarismo. Lisbon: Perspectivas e Realidades.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1987. “Social Foundations of Political Order in Interwar Europe.” World Politics 39(4): 449–78.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Altman, David. 2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, Monestier, Felipe, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2014. “Religious Parties in Chile: The Christian Democratic Party and the Independent Democratic Union.” In Religiously Oriented Parties and Democratization, eds. Ozzano, Luca, and Cavatorta, Francesco. New York: Routledge, 119–40.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, Rodríguez, Rafael Piñeiro, Rosenblatt, Fernando, and Vommaro, Gabriel, eds. 2021. Diminished Parties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294–307. www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781009072045/type/book (May 29, 2023).Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, Rosenblatt, Fernando, and Vommaro, Gabriel. 2021. “Political Parties, Diminished Subtypes, and Democracy.” Party Politics 27(2).Google Scholar
Macedo, Jorge Braga. 2003. “Portugal’s European Integration: The Limits of External Pressure.” In Portugal: Strategic Options in a European Context, eds. Monteiro, Fatima, Tavares, Jose, Glatzer, Miguel, and Cardoso, Ângelo. Maryland: Lexington Books, 61–97.Google Scholar
Madariaga, Aldo. 2020. NEOLIBERAL RESILIENCE: Lessons in Democracy and Development from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Madureira, Nuno Luís. 2007. “Cartelization and Corporatism: Bureaucratic Rule in Authoritarian Portugal, 1926–45.” Journal of Contemporary History 42(1): 79–96.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research. 28(4).Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2004. “Comparative-Historical Methodology.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 81–101.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2012. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Makler, Harry M. 1976. “The Portuguese Industrial Elite and Its Corporative Relations: A Study of Compartmentalization in an Authoritarian Regime.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 24(3): 495–526.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 2011. “The Experience of European Integration and the Potential for Integration in South America.” In New Regionalism and the European Union: Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions, eds. Warleigh-Lack, Alex, Robinson, Nick, and Rosamund, Ben. Perth, UK: Routledge, 135–57.Google Scholar
Marambio, Alexis, Navia, Patricio, Figueras, Cristian, and Madera, Ariel. 2017. “La Cohesión Legislativa Entre La Concertación y El Partido Comunista En Chile, 2010–2013.” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 25(50): 179–202.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2005. “Social Protection around the World External Insecurity, State Capacity, and Domestic Political Cleavages.” Comparative Political Studies 38(6): 623–51.Google Scholar
Markoff, John, and Montecinos, Verónica. 1993. “The Ubiquitous Rise of Economists.” Journal of Public Policy 13(1): 37–68.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary. 1986a. “Neocorporatism and Incomes Policy in Western Europe and North America.” Comparative Politics 18(3): 253–77.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary. 1986b. Unions in Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary. 2014. “Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States.” In Governance in the European Union, eds. Marks, Gary, Scharpf, Fritz W., Schmitter, Philippe C., and Streeck, Wolfgang. London: SAGE Publications, 15–39.Google Scholar
Martins, Pedro S. 2020. “30,000 Minimum Wages: The Economic Effects of Collective Bargaining Extensions.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 59(2): 335–69.Google Scholar
Martins, Pedro S., and Saraiva, Joana. 2019. “Assessing the Legal Value Added of Collective Bargaining Agreements.” GLO Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
McIlroy, John. 1998. “The Enduring Alliance? Trade Unions and the Making of New Labour, 1994–1997.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 36(4): 537–64.Google Scholar
Meidner, Rudolf. 1974. Coordination and Solidarity: An Approach to Wages Policy. Stockholm: Bokforlaget Prisma.Google Scholar
El Mercurio. 2000. “Government Will Enforce Their Majority for Labor Reform.” December 14th.Google Scholar
El Mercurio. 2001a. “DC Asks to Use Frei’s Labor Initiative.” April 3rd.Google Scholar
El Mercurio. 2001b. “Longueiras Shows Disposition to Talk with Lagos.” November 11th.Google Scholar
El Mercurio. 2001c. “Presidential Offensive for Aligning the Concertacion.” April 3rd.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1872. System of Logic. 8th Edition. London: Longman, Green.Google Scholar
Monestier, Felipe. 2007. Movimientos Sociales, Partidos Políticos y Democracia Directa Desde Abajo En Uruguay: 1985–2004. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. http://biblioteca.clacso.org/clacso/becas/20190809055042/mone.pdf.Google Scholar
Montecinos, Veronica. 1998. Economists, Politics and the State. Amsterdam: CELDA.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1978. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, New York: M.E. Sharpe Publisher.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 1986. “Consolidamento Democratico: Definizione e Modelli.” Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 16(2): 197–238.Google Scholar
Moulian, Tomás. 1986a. El Gobierno de Ibáñez, 1952–1958. Santiago de Chile: Programa FLACSO.Google Scholar
Moulian, Tomás. 1986b. “288 La Democracia Cristiana En Su Fase Ascendente, 1957–1964.” Programa FLACSO.Google Scholar
Moulián, Tomás. 2003. “El Sistema de Partidos En Chile.” In El asedio a la política: los partidos latinoamericanos en la era neoliberal, eds. Cavarozzi, Marcelo, and Abal Medina, Juan Manuel. Rosario: Homo Sapiens/Fundación Konrad Adenauer, 241–57.Google Scholar
Moulián, Tomás. 1989. El régimen de gobierno 1933–1973: Algunos problemas institucionales. Documento de Trabajo Programa. Santiago de Chile: FLASCO, 406.Google Scholar
Moulian, Tomás, and Torres, Isabel. 1989. “La Problemática de La Derecha Política En Chile, 1964–1983.” In Muerte y resurrección de los partidos políticos en el autoritarismo, en las transiciones en el Cono Sur, eds. Cavarozzi, Marcelo, and Garretón, Manuel A.. Santiago de Chile: FLASCO, 335–94.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie. 2018. Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz Gomá, Oscar. 2007. El Modelo Económico de La Concertación 1990–2005: ¿Reformas o Cambio? Chile: Flacso.Google Scholar
Muñoz Gomá, Oscar, and Arriagada, Ana María. 1977. Orígenes Políticos y Económicos Del Estado Empresarial En Chile. Santiago de Chile: Corporación de Investigaciones Económicas para Latinoamérica.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria, and Schrank, Andrew. 2005. “With a Little Help from My Friends: Partisan Politics, Transnational Alliances, and Labor Rights in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 38(8): 971–99.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2006. “Three’s Company: Old and New Alignments in Chile’s Party System.” In The Chilean Road to Democracy and the Market, eds. Oppenheim, Silvia, and Borzutzky, Lois. Florida: University Press of Florida, 42–63.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Miguel Sandoval, José. 1998. Binomial Electoral Law and Multi-Party System: The Chilean Contradiction. Chicago, IL: Latin American Studies Association.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 2010. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Notaro, Jorge. 2016. “La Estrategia y La Política Económica de La Dictadura 1973–1984.” In El Negocio Del Terrorismo de Estado: Los Cómplices Económicos de La Dictadura Uruguaya, ed. Bohoslavsky, Juan Pablo. Montevideo: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, 83–100.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1988. Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina, 1966–1973, in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1996. El Estado Burocrático Autoritario: Triunfos, Derrotas y Crisis. Buenos Aires: Editorial de Belgrano Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
OECD. 2017. Labour Market Reforms in Portugal 2011–15: A Preliminary Assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. 2020. “Income Distribution Database.” https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IDD.Google Scholar
Ominami, Carlos. 2009. El Debate Silenciado. Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.Google Scholar
Ondetti, Gabriel. 2021. Property Threats and the Politics of Anti-Statism. The Historical Roots of Contemporary Tax Systems in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lois Hecht. 1993. Politics in Chile: Democracy, Authoritarianism, and the Search for Development. New York: Routledge, 118–20.Google Scholar
Palacios‐Valladares, Indira, and Ondetti, Gabriel. 2018. “Student Protest and the Nueva Mayoría Reforms in Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 38(5): 638–53.Google Scholar
Palma Ramalho, Maria do Rosário. 2013. “Portuguese Labour Law and Industrial Relations during the Crisis.” In The Governance of Policy Reforms in Southern Europe and Ireland, eds. Papadakis, Konstantinos, and Ghellab, Youcef. Geneva: International Labour Office, 147–62.Google Scholar
Pérez Ahumada, Pablo. 2021. “Why Is It So Difficult to Reform Collective Labor Law? Associational Power and Policy Continuity in Chile in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Latin American Studies 53(1): 81–105.Google Scholar
Pérez, Verónica, Piñeiro, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2019. How Party Activism Survives: Uruguay’s Frente Amplio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2012. “Big, Slow-Moving, and … Invisible: Macrosocial Processes in the Study of Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, eds. Mahoney, James, and Rueshemeyer, Dietrich. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2017. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2018. “Stability and Incorporation.” Party Politics 26(2): 249–60.Google Scholar
Pochet, Philippe, and Fajertag, Giuseppe. 2000. “A New Era for Social Pacts in Europe.” In Social Pacts in Europe – New Dynamics, eds. Fajertag, Giuseppe, and Pochet, Philippe. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute/Observatoire Social Européen, 9–40.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Polga-Hecimovich, John, and Siavelis, Peter M.. 2015. “Here’s the Bias! A (Re-) Reassessment of the Chilean Electoral System.” Electoral Studies 40: 268–79.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2018. “Comparative Political Economy and Varieties of Macroeconomics.” (August).Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, and Swenson, Peter a. 1996. “Labor Markets, Production Strategies, and Wage Bargaining Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 223. http://cps.sagepub.com/content/29/2/223.short.Google Scholar
Porrini, Rodolfo. 2003. “Clase Obrera, Sindicatos y Estado En El Uruguay de La Expansion Industrial (1936–1947): Algunas Conclusiones y Nuevos Problemas Para Su Investigación.” Estudos Ibero-Americanos.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer, Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2010. “The Chilean Left in Power: Achievements, Failures, and Omissions.” In Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings, eds. Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raúl L., and Hunter, Wendy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 77–97.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1988. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Wallerstein, Michael. 1982. “The Structure of Class Conflict in Democratic Society.” American Political Science Review 76(2): 215–38.Google Scholar
Pucci, Francisco, Nión, Soledad, and Ciapessoni, Fioretta. 2014. “La Negociación Colectiva En El Primer Gobierno de Izquierda Del Uruguay.” Latin American Research Review 49(2): 3–23.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1994. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1992. “‘Casing’ and the Process of Social Inquiry.” In What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, eds. Ragin, Charles C., and Becker, Howard S.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 217–26.Google Scholar
Raitzin, Keila. 2017. “Nueva Mayoría. Condiciones Políticas Para Un Nuevo Acercamiento Entre El PS y El PC En Chile En 2013.” Revista Política Latinoamericana 4.Google Scholar
Rama, Carlos. 1976. Historia Del Movimiento Obrero y Social Latinoamericano Contemporáneo. Barcelona: Editorial Laia.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Magnus B., and Henrik Knutsen, Carl. 2023. Reforming to Survive. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Christopher, and Feltch, Brian M. Barros. 2014. “Parties, Cleavages and Issue Evolution: The Case of the Religious-Secular Cleavage in Chile.” Party Politics.Google Scholar
Real de Azua, Carlos. 1984. Uruguay, ¿una Sociedad Amortiguadora? Montevideo: Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Rehn, Gosta. 1985. “Swedish Active Labour Market Policy: Retrospect and Prospect.” Industrial Relations 24(1): 62–89.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1984. Party Competition and Public Policy: Argentina and Chile, 1890–1930. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
La República. 2009. “Alternative Project: Chambers Limit Participation of the State Only for the Wage Councils.” La República.Google Scholar
Reyes, Carlos. 2021. “Expresidente Lagos: ‘Esta No Es La Madre de Todas Las Batallas, Ésta Debiera Ser La Madre de Todos Los Acuerdos Que Queremos Alcanzar En Una Constitucion’.” La Tercera, 1. www.latercera.com/politica/noticia/expresidente-lagos-esta-no-es-la-madre-de-todas-las-batallas-esta-debiera-ser-la-madre-de-todos-los-acuerdos-que-queremos-alcanzar-en-una-constitucion/A6572WOREJEERNZGQRDTXFO2SM/.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Martin John. 2011. “Coordination, Concertation and Conflict in Labour Market Reform: Spain and Italy in the Crisis.” APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995. “From the Barricades to the Ballot Box: Redemocratization and Political Realignment in the Chilean Left.” Politics & Society 23(4): 495–519.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36(4): 3–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2007. “The Crisis of Labor Politics in Latin America: Parties and Labor Movements during the Transition to Neoliberalism.” International Labor and Working-Class History 72: 116–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2013. “Market Reform, Programmatic (De)Alignment, and Party System Stability in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 46(11): 1422–52.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Héctor. 1966. Nuestros Sindicatos. Montevideo: Centro de Estudiantes de Derecho.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Juan Manuel, Cozzano, Beatriz, and Mazzuchi, Graciela. 2001. La Transformacion de Las Relaciones Laborales. Uruguay 1985–2001. Montevideo: Universidad Catolica del Uruguay.Google Scholar
2006. “Las Relaciones Laborales En El Año 2005.”Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Juan Manuel, Cozzano, Beatriz, Mazzuchi, Graciela, and Eloísa González, María. 2015. Las Relaciones Laborales En 2015 y Perspectivas Para El 2016. Montevideo: Universidad Católica del Uruguay.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2016. “Premature Deindustrialization.” Journal of Economic Growth. 21: 1–33.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2018. Party Vibrancy and Democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Royo, Sebastián. 2002. “‘A New Century of Corporatism?’ Corporatism in Spain and Portugal.” West European Politics 25(3): 77–104.Google Scholar
Royo, Sebastián. 2010. “Portugal and Spain in the EU: Paths of Economic Divergence (2000–2007).” Analise Social 45(195): 209–54.Google Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rueda, David. 2008. “Political Agency and Institutions: Explaining the Influence of Left Government and Corporatism on Inequality.” In Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective, eds. Beramendi, Pablo, and Anderson, Christopher J.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 169–200.Google Scholar
Rueda, David, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2000. “Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics 52(3): 350–383.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Huber Stephens, Evelyne, and Stephens, John. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salinas, Maximiliano. 1980. Clotario Blest: Vida de Un Dirigente. Santiago de Chile: Vicaría de la Solidaridad, Arzobispado de Santiago.Google Scholar
Sandbrook, Richard, Edelman, Marc, Heller, Patrick, and Teichman, Judith. 2007. Social Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schipani, Andres. 2019. Strategies of Redistribution: The Left and the Popular Sectors in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The Review of Politics 36(1): 85–131.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1999. Portugal: Do Autoritarismo à Democracia. Lisbon: Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Grote, Jurgen R.. 1997. “The Corporatist Sisyphus: Past, Present and Future.”Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schrank, Andrew. 2009. “Understanding Latin American Political Economy: Varieties of Capitalism or Fiscal Sociology?” Economy and Society 38(1): 53–61.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Ira M et al. 2003. Portugal: Strategic Options in European Context. Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research.” Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294–308.Google Scholar
Sehnbruch, Karen. 2006. The Chilean Labor Market: A Key to Understanding Latin American Labor Markets. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Senatore, Luis, and Yaffé, Jaime. 2005. “Los Sindicatos Uruguayos Ante El Primer Gobierno de Izquierda.” OSAL 5(16): 91–99.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 1997. “Continuity and Change in the Chilean Party System: On the Transformational Effects of Electoral Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 30(6): 651–74.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization in Chile’s Centralized Polity.” In Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association. Washington, DC: Estados Unidos.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 1993. “Capitalist Coalitions, the State, and Neoliberal Economic Restructuring: Chile, 1973–88.” World Politics 45(4): 526–59.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 1996. “From Dictatorship to Democracy: The Business-State Nexus in Chile’s Economic Transformation, 1975–1994.” Comparative Politics 28(3): 299–320.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1979. “Information Processing Models of Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 30(1): 363–96.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Simmons, Erica. 2010. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 43(7): 886–917.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2013. “The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison.” Comparative Political Studies 46(10): 1301–27.Google Scholar
Smith, Rand. 2012. Enemy Brothers: Socialists and Communists in France, Italy and Spain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Smith, Rand. 2014. Enemy Brothers: Socialists and Communists in France, Italy and Spain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Soskice, David. 1999. “Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, eds. Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and John, D. Stephens. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 101–34.Google Scholar
Soskice, David. 2008. “Macroeconomics and Varieties of Capitalism.” In Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy, eds. Hancké, Bob, Rhodes, Martin, and Thatcher, Mark. New York: Oxford University Press, 89–121.Google Scholar
Soskice, David, and Iversen, Torben. 2000. “The Nonneutrality of Monetary Policy with Large Price or Wage Setters.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(5): 265–484.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jurg, and Ertman, Thomas. 2002. The Fate of Consociationalism in Western Europe, 1969–1999. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred C. 1978. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 2005. The Logic of Social Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stockhammer, Engelbert. 2022. “Post-Keynesian Macroeconomic Foundations for Comparative Political Economy.” Politics and Society 50(1): 156–87.Google Scholar
Stoleroff, Alan. 2013. “Employment Relations and Unions in Public Administration in Portugal and Spain: From Reform to Austerity.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 19(4): 309–23.Google Scholar
Stolovich, Luis, Bértola, Luis, and Manuel Rodríguez, Juan. 1991. El Poder Económico En El Uruguay Actual.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2012. “Markets and Peoples: Democratic Capitalism and European Integration New Left Review.” New Left Review 73: 63–71.Google Scholar
Streek, Wolfgang, and Kenworthy, Lane. 2005. “Theories and Practices of Neocorporatism.” In The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Society and Organizations, eds. Janoski, Thomas, Alford, Robert, Hicks, Alexander, and Schwartz, Mildred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 441–60.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2011. “The Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in the Americas.” Global Social Policy 11(2–3): 250–78.Google Scholar
Taylor, Marcus. 2006. From Pinochet to the “Third Way.” London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Teodoro, António. 2003. “Globalização e Educação: Políticas Educacionais e Novos Modos de Governação.”Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000a. “Chronology: The Vagaries of the Concertación to the Initiative.” December 13th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000b. “Businessmen Call for a ‘Change of Direction’ to Lagos.” December 9th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000c. “Government Gives in to Pressure and Modifies Again Labor Reform.” December 12th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000d. “Lagos Defines His Position about Changes in Labor Reform.” December 15th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000e. “Riesco’s Confessions, Outgoing President of the CPC.” December 11th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000f. “Tightening of Labor Reform Shakes the Ruling Party.” December 13th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2000g. “Alejandro Foxley Disagrees with the Government and Send Signals to the Right.” December 18th.Google Scholar
La Tercera. 2001. “Softening of the Labor Reform and Support for Lower Taxes Seeks to Clear Uncertainties That Threaten Reactivation.” March 23rd.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2001. “Varieties of Labour Politics in Developed Democracies.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, eds. Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–103.Google Scholar
Traxler, Franz. 2003. “Bargaining (de) Centralization, Macroeconomic Performance and Control over the Employment Relationship.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 41(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Traxler, Franz. 2004. “Employer Associations, Institutions and Economic Change: A Crossnational Comparison.” Industrielle Beziehungen/The German Journal of Industrial Relations 11(1/2): 42–60.Google Scholar
Traxler, Franz, Blaschke, Sabine, and Kittel, Bernhard. 2001. National Labour Relations in Internationalized Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel, and Slovic, Paul. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valadas, Carla. 2017. “A Changing Labour Market under the Intensification of Dualization. The Experience of a Southern European Society.” Social Policy & Administration 51(2): 328–47.Google Scholar
Valdez, Jimena. 2020. “What Capital Wants: Business Interests and Labor Market Reform in Portugal and Spain.” Comparative Politics 53(4): 571–96.Google Scholar
Valdéz, Rodrigo. 2018. “Reflexiones Practicas Con 842 Días En Hacienda.” Estudios Públicos 150(Otoño). www.cepchile.cl.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1999. “Chile.” In Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, eds. Diamond, Larry, Hartlyn, Jonathan, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 159–206.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1985. Democratización Vía Reforma: La Expansión Del Sufragio En Chile. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones del IDES.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1995. “Orígenes y Transformaciones Del Sistema de Partidos En Chile.” Estudios Públicos 58: 5–80.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Samuel. 1976. “The Chilean Labor Movement: The Institutionalization of Conflict.” In Chile: Politics and Society, eds. Valenzuela, Arturo, and Valenzuela, Samuel. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 135–71.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2015. “ICTWSS Data Base. Version 5.0.” Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael. 1990. “Centralized Bargaining and Wage Restraint.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 982–1004.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael. 1999. “Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 43(3).Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. et al. 2016. “Deliberative Negotiation.” In Political Negotiation: A Handbook, eds. Mansbridge, Jane, and Martin, Cathie Jo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 141–98.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2017. “A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111(1): 39–53.Google Scholar
Watson, Sara. 2015. The Left Divided: The Development and Transformation of Advanced Welfare States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2009a. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2009b. “The Rise of Latin America’s Two Lefts: Insight from Rentier State Theory.” Comparative Politics 41(2): 145–64.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2010. “The Performance of Leftist Governments in Latin America.” In Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings, eds. Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raul, and Hunter, Wendy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–27.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raúl L., and Hunter, Wendy. 2010. “The Policies and Performance of the Contestatory and Moderate Left.” In Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings, eds. Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raul, and Hunter, Wendy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–80.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard. 1973. “Toward a Framework for the Study of Political Change in the Iberic-Latin Tradition: The Corporative Model.” World Politics 25(2): 206–35.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard. 1974. “Corporatism and Development in the Iberic-Latin World: Persistent Strains and New Variations.” The Review of Politics 36(1): 3–33.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard, and Mac Leish Mott, Margareth. 2001. Catholic Roots and Democratic Flowers: Political Systems in Spain and Portugal. Connecticut: Praeger Publisher.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1994. “In Search of a Manual for Technopols.” In The Political Economy of Policy Reform, ed. Williamson, John. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 11–28.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2020. “World Development Indicators Online Database.” https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.Google Scholar
Yaffé, Jaime. 2001. “El Intervencionismo Batllista: Estatismo y Regulación En Uruguay (1900–1913).”Google Scholar
Yaffé, Jaime. 2005. “Sindicatos e Partidos No Uruguai-Da Fundação Da CNT Ao Triunfo Da Esquerda (1964–2004).” Esboços: histórias em contextos globais 12: 63–74.Google Scholar
Zubillaga, Carlos, and Balbis, Jorge. 1985. Historia Del Movimiento Sindical Uruguayo. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Zurbriggen, Cristina. 2006. Estado, Empresarios y Redes Rentistas Durante El Proceso Sustitutivo de Importaciones: Los Condicionantes Históricos de Las Reformas Actuales. Montevideo: Editorial Banda Oriental.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×