Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:35:01.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Carbon Calculation and the Urban Green Economic Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

By
Will Eadson  and
Aidan While
Edited by
Jenny M. Fairbrass  and
Nicholas Vasilakos
Jenny M. Fairbrass
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Nicholas Vasilakos
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines how definitions of the green economy and shaped by and seek to shape norms and discourses of economic development. It draws on multi-level governance theories alongside literature from critical accounting to investigate ways that urban policy actors have sought to make the case for investment in the green economy. The chapter aims to expand existing conceptualisations of the politics of calculation (in a multi-level governance context) to illuminate how calculations represent a range of assumptions about territory, the way people live and the nature of place and society in the present and the future. Empirically, the chapter focuses on a series of ‘Mini-Stern’ reports commissioned by urban governments in England that took as inspiration Nicholas Stern’s influential 2006 report on the economics of climate change. The chapter analyses how these reports use various calculative devices relating to carbon reductionin order to justify, de-risk and legitimise what might be seen as experimental or risky policy options; and the implications for how cities are represented as a result.

Keywords

green economylow carbon flowscarbon savings
Type
Chapter
Information
Emerging Governance of a Green Economy
Cases of European Implementation
 , pp. 127 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. (2009). Three spaces of power: territory, networks, plus a topological twist in the tale of domination and authority. Power, 2(2), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BEIS (2017). Carbon valuation. Online source, accessed 3 January 2018: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/carbon-valuation--2Google Scholar
Bridge, G. (2010). Resource geographies 1: making carbon economies, old and new. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 6.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (2010). Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bumpus, A. and Liverman, D. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84(2), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Gay, P., Millo, Y. and Tuck, P. (2012). Making government liquid: shifts in governance using financialisation as a political device. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(6), 1083–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadson, W. (2011) Constructions of the carbon city. In Flint, J. and Raco, M., eds., The Future of Sustainable Cities. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Enworks (2013). The economic potential of low carbon and environmental goods and services (LCEGS) sector in Greater Manchester. http://enworks.com/resources/Economic%20potential%20of%20LCEGS%20Sector%20in%20Greater%20Manchester_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fournier, V. (2008). Escaping from the economy: the politics of degrowth, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(11/12), 528–545.Google Scholar
Gibbs, D. (2000) Ecological modernisation, regional economic development and regional development agencies. Geoforum, 31(3) 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldson, A., Kerr, N., Topi, C., Dawkins, E., Kuylenstierna, J. and Pearce, R. (2012). The Economics of Low Carbon Cities A Mini-Stern Review for the Leeds City Region. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism Geographiska Annaler, 71B, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haughton, G., Counsell, D. and Vigar, G. (2008). Sustainable development in post-devolution UK and Ireland, Regional Studies, 42(9), 1223–1236.Google Scholar
Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 377–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2004) Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In Bache, I. and Flinders, M., eds., Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2000). The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the ecological dominance of globalizing, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 323–360.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance. In Bache, I. and Flinders, M., eds., Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.49–74.Google Scholar
Katagawa, F. (2013). City-regions, universities and innovation: the evolution and transformation of UK urban governance institutions. In Cooke, Philip, ed., Re-framing regional development: evolution, innovation and transition. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornberger, M. (2013). Disciplining the future: On studying the politics of strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Carter, C. (2010). Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(3), 325–349.Google Scholar
Lapsley, I., Miller, P. and Panozzo, F. (2010). Accounting for the city. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(3), 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, L. (2009). Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 499–534.Google Scholar
Lövbrand, E. and Stripple, J. (2011). Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets, Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H. and Owens, S. (2009). Converging agendas: Energy and climate change policies in the UK. Environment and Planning C, 27(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D. (2009). Making things the same: Gases emissions rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 440–455.Google Scholar
Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: why calculative practices matter. Social Research, 68(2), 379–396.Google Scholar
North, P. (2010). Eco-localisation as a progressive response to peak oil and climate change – A sympathetic critique. Geoforum, 41(4), 585–594.Google Scholar
Rutland, T. and Aylett, A. (2008). The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 627–646.Google Scholar
van Stigt, R., Driessen, P. P. J. and Spit, T. J. M. (2013). Compact city development and the challenge of environmental policy integration: a multi-level governance perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. (2006). The Economics of Climate Change. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Stripple, J. and Bulkeley, H. (2014). Governing the climate: new approaches to rationality, power and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wanner, T. (2015). The New ‘Passive Revolution’ of the Green Economy and Growth Discourse: Maintaining the ‘Sustainable Development’ of Neoliberal Capitalism, New Political Economy, 20(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, K. (2003). Entrepreneurial urbanism, state restructuring and civilizing ‘New’ East Manchester. Area, 35, 116–127.Google Scholar
Wesselink, A. and Gouldson, A. (2014). Pathways to impact in local government: the mini-Stern review as evidence in policy making in the Leeds City Region. Policy Sciences, 47, 407–433.Google Scholar
While, A. (2010). The carbon calculus and transitions in urban politics and urban political theory. In Bulkeley, H., Hodson, M. and Marvin, S., eds., Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: RoutlTedge.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. and Mueller, F. (2010). Strategy, enrolment and accounting: the politics of strategic ideas, Accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(5), 626–646.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×