Book contents
- Emergency Medicine Thinker
- Emergency Medicine Thinker
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Decision-Making
- 1 On Deciding to Not Decide
- 2 What Makes Emergency Medicine Decision-Making Unique and Why?
- 3 Pediatric Emergency Medicine Approach: Be Vigilant but Be Reasonable
- 4 Decision-Making in Emergency Medicine
- 5 Emergency Medicine Medical Decision-Making
- 6 Decisions
- 7 Emergency Thinking and Behavior
- 8 Emergency Medicine Decision-Making
- 9 Emergency Medicine Decision-Making
- 10 Emergency Medicine Thinking and Cognitive Load Considerations
- 11 Decision-Making in Uncertainty
- 12 Unlearning and Thinking Differently
- 13 Decision-Making in Emergency Medicine
- 14 An Object in Motion
- 15 Too Little or Too Much?
- 16 Decision-Making in Emergency Medicine
- 17 Medical Decision-Making in the Emergency Department: Balancing the Patient’s Health with the Clinician’s Perception of Risk
- Section 2 Clinical Pearls
- Index
- References
15 - Too Little or Too Much?
from Section 1 - Decision-Making
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2025
- Emergency Medicine Thinker
- Emergency Medicine Thinker
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Decision-Making
- 1 On Deciding to Not Decide
- 2 What Makes Emergency Medicine Decision-Making Unique and Why?
- 3 Pediatric Emergency Medicine Approach: Be Vigilant but Be Reasonable
- 4 Decision-Making in Emergency Medicine
- 5 Emergency Medicine Medical Decision-Making
- 6 Decisions
- 7 Emergency Thinking and Behavior
- 8 Emergency Medicine Decision-Making
- 9 Emergency Medicine Decision-Making
- 10 Emergency Medicine Thinking and Cognitive Load Considerations
- 11 Decision-Making in Uncertainty
- 12 Unlearning and Thinking Differently
- 13 Decision-Making in Emergency Medicine
- 14 An Object in Motion
- 15 Too Little or Too Much?
- 16 Decision-Making in Emergency Medicine
- 17 Medical Decision-Making in the Emergency Department: Balancing the Patient’s Health with the Clinician’s Perception of Risk
- Section 2 Clinical Pearls
- Index
- References
Summary
Despite more than a decade since my own exposure to Bayes’ Theorem3,4 during medical school, its concepts still ring true in my day-to-day practice of emergency medicine (EM). For review, the theorem utilizes pretest probability to help clinicians interpret results of testing. Afterall, each medical test has a set of unique test performance that includes sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR). With test characteristics and disease/community context in mind, pretest probability can even be used to decide if testing is indicated in the first place! Most medical specialties involved in patient evaluation, workup, and diagnosis apply these conceptual frameworks to some degree in their daily practice. What’s unique for EM clinicians is that the same concepts apply not only to diagnostic testing, but also to facets of history-taking and physical examination. As an experienced EM physician, if an interview question or physical exam maneuver is unlikely to change my workup and treatment of a patient, I often defer it.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emergency Medicine ThinkerPearls for the Frontlines, pp. 114 - 117Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025