Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:59:46.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Liberal Power Monopoly in the Cities of Imperial Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Larry Eugene Jones
Affiliation:
Canisius College, New York
James Retallack
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

In the past historians have often started from the assumption that the decline of the liberal parties during the last decades of the nineteenth century indicated a lack of liberal sentiments and liberal commitment in German society. According to this view political liberalism never really established itself in Germany. Consequently the so-called liberal era of the 1860s was followed by a return to conservative politics during the 1880s and 1890s. The resurgence of the conservative parties combined with a shift in Bismarckian policies to produce what some historians have called the second or conservative foundation of the German Empire. Some historians have also argued that contemporary chauvinist, antisemitic, and conservative authors encouraged this supposed development with their attacks on economic and political liberalism. However it is difficult to assess how extensive their influence really was. Other historians have pointed to the economic crisis after 1873 as another possible cause for the shift towards conservatism in the 1880s. As a consequence economic and, in its wake, political liberalism were apparently weakened. Although a case can be made in favor of this rather deterministic view, it does not do justice to the complex relationship between economic and political liberalism and its place in Imperial Germany. Other historians have tended to emphasize a change in political style and political attitudes. According to them the constitutional practice of the new German Empire, Bismarck's manipulative and authoritarian style of politics and the continuation of Junker predominance in Prussia were responsible for a shift towards conservatism in the 1880s. In addition, ostracism of the socialist party and of the trade union movement has been seen as a sign of a repressive regime which felt strong enough to withstand the gradually declining challenge of political and economic liberalism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×