Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The economics of World War I: an overview
- 2 The pity of peace: Germany's economy at war, 1914–1918 and beyond
- 3 Austria-Hungary's economy in World War I
- 4 The Ottoman economy in World War I
- 5 Between the devil and the deep blue sea: the Dutch economy during World War I
- 6 Was the Great War a watershed? The economics of World War I in France
- 7 The United Kingdom during World War I: business as usual?
- 8 Poor Russia, poor show: mobilising a backward economy for war, 1914–1917
- 9 Italy at war, 1915–1918
- 10 Until it's over, over there: the US economy in World War I
- Index
- References
1 - The economics of World War I: an overview
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The economics of World War I: an overview
- 2 The pity of peace: Germany's economy at war, 1914–1918 and beyond
- 3 Austria-Hungary's economy in World War I
- 4 The Ottoman economy in World War I
- 5 Between the devil and the deep blue sea: the Dutch economy during World War I
- 6 Was the Great War a watershed? The economics of World War I in France
- 7 The United Kingdom during World War I: business as usual?
- 8 Poor Russia, poor show: mobilising a backward economy for war, 1914–1917
- 9 Italy at war, 1915–1918
- 10 Until it's over, over there: the US economy in World War I
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Globalisation has been under way for centuries. The modern wave of globalisation that dates from the early nineteenth century gave a significant boost to world trade, world capital flows, and worldwide migration, with great powers competing for colonial empires on a global scale. The Great War of 1914 to 1918 then interrupted and, for a time, set into reverse the process of globalisation.
How did globalisation lead to war? At first sight it was the competition for colonies that ran out of control. Britain and France, the established powers of ‘old’ Europe, had established a condominium over most of Africa and much of Asia; Germany, the rising power of ‘new’ Europe, had no colonies to speak of, wanted some, and expected to get them at the expense of the French and the British. Behind this lay a perception that world power was a zero-sum game. Since Adam Smith, the Anglo-Saxon liberals had argued that trade was a game from which all could benefit at once. But in the late nineteenth century liberalism was being challenged by a new nationalism that gave more weight to the control of territory and settlement than to trade and competition. When it came to territory, the supply was fixed and there was only so much to go round. Therefore, the new nationalists reasoned, it was worth Germany's while to break up world trade for a while in order to grab territory from the older powers.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Economics of World War I , pp. 3 - 40Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
(1986), ‘Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind’, Journal of Economic History 46: 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988), Prelude to the Cold War: The Tsarist, Soviet, and U.S. Armies in Two World Wars, Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
(1986), ‘Temporary and Permanent Government Spending in an Open Economy: Some Evidence for the United Kingdom’, Journal of Monetary Economics 17: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974), ‘Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?’, Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), ‘Output Effects of Government Purchases’, Journal of Political Economy 89: 1086–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1920), Direct and Indirect Costs of the Great World War (2nd edition), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1982), ‘An Economic Theory of Military Tactics: Methodological Individualism at War’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(2–3): 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘How did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels, 1870–1990’, Journal of Economic History 58: 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. and Howlett, P. (1998), ‘The United Kingdom: “Victory at All Costs”’, in (ed.), The Economics of World War II: Six Great Powers in International Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) (eds.), Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914–1918, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1931), The Cost of the World War to the American People, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, M. (2000), ‘War and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century’, in and (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, volume III: The Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329–406.Google Scholar
(1992), Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eloranta, J. (2003), ‘Responding to Threats and Opportunities: Military Spending Behavior of the Great Powers, 1870–1913’, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
Ercolani, P. (1969), ‘Documenti statistica di base’, in (ed.), Lo sviluppo economico in Italia, vol. III, Milan: Franco Angeli, pp. 380–460.Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Do Large Deficits Produce High Interest Rates?’, American Economic Review 75: 68–87.Google Scholar
(1972), National Income, Expenditure, and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1997), The European Economy Between the Wars, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fellner, F. (1915), ‘Das Volksvermögern Österreichs und Ungarns’, Bulletin de L'Institut International de Statistique 20, 2e livraisons.
and (1993), ‘The Russian and Soviet Economy in Two World Wars’, Economic History Review 46(3): 425–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1963), Studies in the National Balance Sheet of the United States (2 vols.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) (ed.), The Economics of World War II: Six Great Powers in International Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herwig, H. H. (1988), ‘The Dynamics of Necessity: German Military Policy During the First World War’, in and (eds.), Military Effectiveness, vol. I: The First World War, Boston: Allen and Unwin, pp. 80–115.Google Scholar
(1965), Das Wachstum der deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976), The Formation and Stocks of Total Capital, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (1988), ‘Military Effectiveness in the First World War’, in and (eds.), Military Effectiveness, vol. I: The First World War, Boston: Allen and Unwin, pp. 329–50.Google Scholar
(1985), The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
League of Nations (1927), International Statistical Yearbook, 1926, Geneva: League of Nations, Economic and Financial Section.
Lee, J. (1975), ‘Administrators and Agriculture: Aspects of German Agricultural Policy in the First World War’, in (ed.), War and Economic Development: Essays in Memory of David Joslin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–38.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘The Rise of Social Spending, 1880–1930’, Explorations in Economic History 31: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), The Economic Effects of the Two World Wars on Britain (2nd edition), London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003a), International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750–2000 (5th edition), Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
(2003b), International Historical Statistics: The Americas, 1750–2000 (5th edition), Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘Sovereign Risk, Credibility, and the Gold Standard: 1870–1913 versus 1925–31’, Economic Journal 113(487): 241–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1963), The Economics of the Wartime Shortage: A History of British Food Supplies in the Napoleonic War and in World Wars I and II, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Who Really Won the Arms Race?’, The Times Literary Supplement, 13 November, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
and (1967), The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom (2nd edition), London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1967), The Wealth of the Nation: The National Balance Sheet of the United Kingdom, 1957–1961, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritschl, A. (2003), ‘Dancing on a Volcano: The Economic Recovery and Collapse of Weimar Germany, 1924–33’, in (ed.), The World Economy and National Economies in the Interwar Slump, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983), Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987), German Macroeconomic History, 1880–1979: A Study of the Effects of Economic Policy on Inflation, Currency Depreciation, and Growth, Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, N. (2003), ‘Economic Integration in Historical Perspective: The Case of Interwar Poland, 1918–39’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
- 23
- Cited by