Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:48:46.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Reproductive skew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Robert D. Magrath
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Rufus A. Johnstone
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Robert G. Heinsohn
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Walter D. Koenig
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Janis L. Dickinson
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Cooperatively breeding birds span a huge range of social organization, defined in part by the number of individuals of each sex and their reproductive roles within the group (Brown 1987; Stacey and Koenig 1990a; Cockburn 1998). In some species or groups, individuals of one sex share reproduction roughly equally, while in others a single individual monopolizes reproduction by that sex. Reproductive skew theory attempts to understand this variation in the partitioning of reproduction among individuals of the same sex. Such variation can be quantified as “reproductive skew,” ranging from 0 (egalitarianism) to 1 (monopolization). A key assumption of many models of optimal reproductive skew is that dominant individuals control the reproduction of subordinates, but that in some circumstances allow subordinates to share reproduction as a way of enlisting their cooperation (Vehrencamp 1979, 1980, 1983a, 1983b; Emlen 1982b). Dominants therefore determine the partitioning of reproduction and the magnitude of skew through the size of the reproductive “concession” granted to subordinates. Reproductive skew models were originally designed to explain variation among species, but are also applicable to variation within species and even within single populations (Emlen 1995; Reeve et al. 1998).

Within the last decade there has been a resurgence of interest in reproductive skew, stimulated in part by the ability to use molecular methods to determine parentage and thereby quantify skew.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×