Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T19:14:15.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - ‘Labour law’ regulation

from PART 3 - EC regulation of corporate governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Andrew Johnston
Andrew Johnston
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter analyses the impact of a number of ‘labour law’ directives on corporate governance. Informing and consulting employees about issues which affect their interests, as well as employee participation in corporate decision-making, has been a controversial aspect of the Community's regulatory agenda since the 1970s. Procedural rights of this kind blur the distinction between corporate governance and labour law and remain central to the Community's regulatory agenda. Combined with the reflexive turn taken in a number of recent regulatory instruments, the Community's continuing insistence that corporate decision-making must be regulated because of its impact on employee interests means that EC corporate governance regulation transcends the pure shareholder value model which is found in so many corporate governance codes at national level.

We saw in chapter 4 that the company law harmonisation programme proceeded on the basis that prescriptive harmonisation of all aspects of company law, including employee participation, was required to further market integration. As a matter of policy, re-regulation of national law would be protective of employee interests, and early proposals for a Fifth Company Law Directive and a European Company Statute (ECS) were highly prescriptive. In contrast to this approach to company law, there was little or no Community intervention in the labour law of the Member States before the 1970s, it being anticipated that market integration would drive convergence of the labour law and social policy of the Member States.

Type
Chapter
Information
EC Regulation of Corporate Governance , pp. 311 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Docksey, C., ‘Information and Consultation of Employees: the United Kingdom and the Vredeling Directive’ (1986) 49 Modern Law Review281 at 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W., ‘Industrial Citizenship under Regime Competition: the Case of the European Works Councils’ (1997) 4 Journal of European Public Policy643 at 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S., ‘Reflexive Governance and European Company Law’ (2007) CLPE Research Paper 20/2007 Vol. 3 No. 4 at 16Google Scholar
Hepple, B., ‘The Crisis in EEC Labour Law’ (1987) 16 Industrial Law Journal77 at 77–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., ‘Labour Law and Social Security’, in Stein, E. and Nicholson, T. (eds.), American Enterprise in the European Common Market: a Legal Profile (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960) at 297Google Scholar
Hall, M., ‘Behind the European Works Councils Directive: the European Commission's Legislative Strategy’ (1992) 30 British Journal of Industrial Relations547 at 554–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, M., ‘Employment Protection: Redundancy Procedures and the EEC’ (1976) 5 Industrial Law Journal24 at 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour, J., Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S., ‘Shareholder Primacy and the Trajectory of UK Corporate Governance’ (2003) 41 British Journal of Industrial Relations531 at 542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P., ‘Acquired Rights, Creditors’ Rights, Freedom of Contract, and Industrial Democracy' (1989) 9 Yearbook of European Law21 at 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepple, B., ‘Workers’ Rights in Mergers and Takeovers: the EEC Proposals' (1976) 5 Industrial Law Journal at 200–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, P., ‘The Transfer of Undertakings: a Reluctantly Acquired Right’ (1982) 3 Company Lawyer147 at 155–6Google Scholar
Jeffery, M., ‘European Union Developments: European Labor Laws Relating to Business Restructuring’ (2005) 24 Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal669 at 683Google Scholar
Hepple, B., ‘European Economic Community’ (1977) 6 Industrial Law Journal106 at 107Google Scholar
Armour, J. and Deakin, S., ‘Insolvency and Employment Protection: the Mixed Effects of the Acquired Rights Directive’ (2002) 22 International Review of Law and Economics443 at 445–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘European Economic Community’ (1977) Industrial Law Journal at 107
Durham, W. L., ‘The Proposed Vredeling Directive: a Modest Proposal or the Exportation of Industrial Democracy’ (1984) 70 Virginia Law Review1469 at 1480–2Google Scholar
Davies, P., ‘The Emergence of European Labour Law’, in McCarthy, W. (ed.), Legal Intervention in Industrial Relations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992) at 333Google Scholar
Wedderburn, K., ‘Collective Bargaining or Legal Enactment: the 1999 Act and Union Recognition’ (2000) 29 Industrial Law Journal1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, H., ‘Transnational Employer Lobbying When One Size Does Not Fit All: Anglo-German Wrangles under the Unice Umbrella, 1970–2003’ EUI Working Paper MWP 2007/04 at 9Google Scholar
Streeck, W., ‘Neo-voluntarism: a New European Social Policy Regime’, in Snyder, F. (ed.), The Constitutional Dimensions of European Economic Integration (London: Kluwer, 1996) at 244Google Scholar
Blanpain, R., Blanquet, F., Herman, F. and Mouty, A., The Vredeling Proposal: Information and Consultation of Employees in Multinational Enterprises (Deventer: Kluwer, 1983) at 7Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Vitols, S., ‘Europe: Between Mandatory Consultation and Voluntary Information’, in Rogers, J. and Streeck, W. (eds.), Works Councils: Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations (University of Chicago Press, 1995) at 251Google Scholar
Barnard, C., EC Employment Law 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2000) at 527Google Scholar
Lenoble, J. and Maesschalck, M., ‘Beyond Neo-institutionalist and Pragmatist Approaches to Governance’ (2006) Reflexive Governance in the Public Interest Working Paper Series REFGOV-SGI/TNU-1 at 10 and 50–79Google Scholar
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J., Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992) at 47Google Scholar
Syrpis, P., EU Intervention in Domestic Labour Law (Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simitis, S. and Lyon-Caen, A., ‘Community Labour Law: a Critical Introduction to Its History’, in Davies, P., Sciarra, S., Lyon-Caen, A. and Simitis, S. (eds.), European Community Labour Law: Principles and Perspectives (Oxford University Press 1996) at 9–10Google Scholar
Mückenberger, U. and Deakin, S., ‘From Deregulation to a European Floor of Rights: Labour Law, Flexibilisation and the European Single Market’ (1989) 3 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches und Sozial Recht153 at 154 and 205Google Scholar
Davies, P., ‘Posted Workers: Single Market or Protection of National Labour Law Systems?’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review571 at 586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novitz, T. and Syrpis, P., ‘Economic and Social Rights in Conflict: Political and Judicial Approaches to their Reconciliation’ (2008) 33 European Law Review411 at 423Google Scholar
Blanpain, R. and Graham, R., Temporary Agency Work and the Information Society (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) at 278–9Google Scholar
Dougan, M., ‘Minimum Harmonization and the Internal Market’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review853 at 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slot, P., ‘Harmonisation’ (1996) 21 European Law Review378 at 385Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘The Evolution of the Single Market’, in Barnard, C. and Scott, J. (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002) at 59Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Wilkinson, F., ‘Rights vs Efficiency? The Economic Case for Transnational Labour Standards’ (1994) 23 Industrial Law Journal289 at 308–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W., ‘Beneficial Constraints: On the Economic Limits of Rational Voluntarism’, in Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Boyer, R. (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism: the Embeddedness of Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×