Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:54:26.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Harmonisation

from PART 2 - Supranational regulatory techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Andrew Johnston
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter begins with an outline of the EC Treaty provisions relating to freedom of establishment and the various Treaty bases which permit the introduction of harmonising regulation. It then examines a number of explanations which have been offered for the harmonisation programme and the inclusion of a company law harmonisation power in the Treaty. After a brief examination of the Fifth Company Law Directive, it concludes by canvassing a number of possible explanations for the failure of the programme to harmonise national corporate governance systems.

Freedom of establishment as a route to market integration

The European Community regulates corporate governance not as an end in itself, but because some national regulations prevent or distort resource allocation within the internal market. Article 2 of the EC Treaty provides that the establishment of a common market is one means by which the Community is to achieve its goals, which include economic development, employment and social protection. Article 3 then includes among the activities of the Community the creation of ‘an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between Member States, of obstacles to the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital’. The EC Treaty provides a legal framework for the internal market, guaranteeing free movement of goods, services, capital and workers, and, most importantly for our purposes, granting freedom of establishment to entrepreneurs and companies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grundmann, S., European Company Law: Organization, Finance and Capital Markets (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2007) at 121Google Scholar
Stein, E., Harmonization of European Company Laws: National Reform and Transnational Coordination (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971) at 24Google Scholar
Abeltshauser, T., ‘Towards a European Constitution of the Firm: Problems and Perspectives’ (1990) 11 Michigan Journal of International Law1235 at 1252Google Scholar
Scholten, Y., ‘Company Law in Europe’ (1967) 4 Common Market Law Review377 at 386Google Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘The Transfer of the Company's Seat in European Company Law’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review661Google Scholar
Drury, R., ‘The Regulation and Recognition of Foreign Corporations: Responses to the “Delaware Syndrome”’ (1998) 57 Cambridge Law Journal165 at 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, R., ‘The “Delaware” Syndrome: European Fears and Reactions’ (2005) Journal of Business Law 709 at 711–16Google Scholar
Halbhuber, H., ‘National Doctrinal Structures and European Company Law’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review1385 at 1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conard, A. F., ‘The European Alternative to Uniformity in Corporation Laws’ (1991) 89 Michigan Law Review2150 at 2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘Is a Directive on Corporate Mobility Needed?’ (2007) 8 European Business Organization Law Review161 at 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charny, D., ‘Regulatory Competition and the Global Co-ordination of Labor Standards’ (2000) 3 Journal of International Economic Law281 at 424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, S., Regulatory Competition in Company Law in the European Community: Prerequisites and Limits (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002) at 137Google Scholar
Scharpf, F., Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford University Press, 1999) at 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, V., EC Company Law (Oxford University Press, 1999) at 6Google Scholar
Rodière, R., ‘L'harmonisation des Législations Européennes dans le Cadre de la CEE’ (1965) 11 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen336 at 351Google Scholar
Ficker, H., ‘The EEC Directives on Company Law Harmonisation’, in Schmitthoff, C. (ed.), The Harmonisation of European Company Law (London: UKNCCL, 1973) at 67Google Scholar
Houin, R., ‘Le Régime Juridique des Sociétés dans la Communauté Economique Européenne’ (1965) Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen11 at 16Google Scholar
Timmermans, C., ‘Harmonization in the Future of Company Law in Europe’, in Hopt, K. J. and Wymeersch, E. (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law (Oxford University Press, 2003) at 628–36Google Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D., ‘Compétition entre Systèmes Réglementaires’ (1995) 387 Revue du Marché Commun et de l'Union Européenne220 at 222–3Google Scholar
Ferran, E., Building an EU Securities Market (Cambridge University Press, 2004) at 202–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, J., ‘European Company Law: Quo Vadis?’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review257 at 294–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, F., Company Law in the United Kingdom and the European Community: Its Harmonisation and Unification (London: Athlone Press 1991) at 135–6Google Scholar
McCahery, J. A. and Vermeulen, E. P. M., ‘Does the European Company Prevent the “Delaware Effect”?’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal785 at 792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCahery, J. and Vermeulen, E. P. M., ‘Understanding Corporate Mobility in the EU Towards the Foundations of a European “Internal Affairs Doctrine” (2007) Working Paper Prepared for the 5th European Company Law and Corporate Governance Conference in Berlin on 27–28 June 2007 at 3–4Google Scholar
Kolvenbach, W., ‘EEC Company Law Harmonization and Worker Participation’ (1990) 11 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law709 at 712Google Scholar
Enriques, L., ‘Company Law Harmonization Reconsidered: What Role for the EC?’ in Bartman, S. (ed.), European Company Law in Accelerated Progress (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2006) at 61Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, C., ‘The Future of the European Company Law Scene’, in Schmitthoff, (ed.), The Harmonisation of European Company Law (1973) (London: UKNCCL, 1973) at 9Google Scholar
Gilson, R., ‘Corporate Governance and Economic Efficiency: When Do Institutions Matter?’ (1996) 74 Washington University Law Quarterly327 at 331Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. and Ullmann-Margalit, E., ‘Second-Order Decisions’, in Sunstein, C. (ed.), Behavioral Law and Economics (Cambridge University Press, 2000) at 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitthoff, C., ‘The Second EEC Directive in Company Law’ (1978) 15 Common Market Law Review43 at 46Google Scholar
Bernard, N., Multilevel Governance (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002) at 44Google Scholar
Callaghan, H., ‘Transnational Employer Lobbying When One Size Does Not Fit All: Anglo-German Wrangles under the UNICE Umbrella, 1970–2003EUI Working Paper MWP 2007/04 at 20Google Scholar
Streeck, W., ‘Industrial Citizenship under Regime Competition: the Case of the European Works Councils’ (1997) 4 Journal of European Public Policy643 at 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. and Mara-Drita, I., ‘How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union’ (1996) 102 American Journal of Sociology1 at 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charny, D., ‘Competition among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate-Law Rules – an American Perspective on the Race to the Bottom in the European Communities’ (1991) 32 Harvard International Law Journal423Google Scholar
Siems, M., ‘The Case against Harmonisation of Shareholder Rights’ (2005) 6 European Business Organization Law Review539 at 542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W., ‘Rights and Production Functions: an Application to Labor-Managed Firms and Co-determination’ (1979) 52 Journal of Business469 at 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadowski, D., Junkes, J. and Lindenthal, S., ‘Labour Co-determination and Corporate Governance in Germany: the Economic Impact of Marginal and Symbolic Rights’ (1999) 60 Quint-EssenzenGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., ‘On the Economic Rationale for Co-determination Law’ (1991) 16 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amable, B., The Diversity of Modern Capitalism (Oxford University Press, 2003) at 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, M., Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact (Oxford University Press, 2003) at 152Google Scholar
Fligstein, N., The Architecture of Markets (Princeton University Press, 2001) at 175Google Scholar
Arthur, B., ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events’ (1989) 99 Economic Journal116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences’ (1998) 61 Modern Law Review11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, M., Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001) at 225–6Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Soskice, D., ‘Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism (Oxford University Press, 2001) at 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, D., Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000) at 9Google Scholar
Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A., ‘Corporate Governance and Labour Management: an International Comparison’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate Governance and Labour Management: an International Comparison (Oxford University Press, 2005), especially at 13–17Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. and Roe, M., ‘A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance’, in Gordon, J. and Roe, M. (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2004) at 96Google Scholar
Weatherill, S., ‘Why Harmonise?’ in Tridimas, T. and Nebbia, P. (eds.), European Law for the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004) at 14–17Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Harmonisation
  • Andrew Johnston, University of Queensland
  • Book: EC Regulation of Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770753.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Harmonisation
  • Andrew Johnston, University of Queensland
  • Book: EC Regulation of Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770753.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Harmonisation
  • Andrew Johnston, University of Queensland
  • Book: EC Regulation of Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770753.004
Available formats
×