Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:51:49.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Legal and Ethical Issues in Assisted Conception Treatment

from Section 3 - Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona-Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Forty-two years have passed since the birth of the first child conceived after IVF of a human oocyte and subsequent transfer into the uterus of the ensuing embryo. Since then, the methods of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) are being widely applied all over the world but, at the same time, scientists, policy makers and ethicists have started the debate regarding the necessity of laws and regulations governing the application of these methods, especially due to the possible risks associated with their application.

This chapter highlights the main legal and ethical issues associated with assisted conception, especially the fact that the lack of a common and binding position among European countries gives rise to problems of particular importance (i.e. non-egalitarian access of all European citizens to the achievements and advancements of reproductive technology, reproductive tourism, or problems associated with international scientific cooperation).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;312:366.Google Scholar
ESHRE. A policy audit on Fertility: analysis of 9 EU countries. 2017. Available at: www.fertilityeurope.eu/our-projects/policy-audit.Google Scholar
Symeonidou-Kastanidou, E, Tarlatzis, B. Assisted Reproduction in Europe: Social, Ethical and Legal Issues. Athens:Sakkoulas Publications, 2015.Google Scholar
Symeonidou-Kastanidou, E, Tarlatzis, B. Medically Assisted Reproduction: Towards a Common European Legislation? Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015.Google Scholar
WHO. Infertility definitions and terminology. Available at: www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/definitions/en.Google Scholar
WHO. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Available at: www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Milapidou, M. Medical inability as a prerequisite for access to assisted reproduction. In: Medically Assisted Reproduction: Towards a Common European Legislation? Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015, pp. 55 et seq.Google Scholar
Chortara, Th. Legislative restrictions of the requirements for the application of assisted reproduction. In: Medically Assisted Reproduction: Towards a Common European Legislation? Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015, pp. 123 et seq.Google Scholar
Handyside, AH, Kontogianni, EH, Hardy, K, Winston, RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344:768770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarlatzis, B. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and ethical dilemmas. In: Medically Assisted Reproduction: Towards a Common European Legislation? Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015, pp. 155 et seq.Google Scholar
De Wert, G, Dondorp, W, Shenfield, F, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 22: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2014;29:16141615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milapidou, M. Assisted reproduction and alternative family models. In: Medically assisted Reproduction: Proposal for Common European Policy. Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015, pp. 4158.Google Scholar
Vasileiou, M. Genetic operations in MAR and pre-implantation diagnosis. In: Medically Assisted Reproduction: Towards a Common European Legislation? Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015, pp. 161 et seq.Google Scholar
The ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Taskforce 9: the application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for human leukocyte antigen typing of embryos. Hum Reprod 2005;20:845847.Google Scholar
Pennings, G. Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:23392343.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, De Wert, G, Pennings, G, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod 2013;28:14481454.Google Scholar
Andornο, R. Biomedicine and international human rights law: in search of a global consensus. Bull World Health Organ 2002;80:959963.Google Scholar
Burns, S. The Law of Assisted Reproduction. London: Bloomsbury Professional; 2012, pp. 546548.Google Scholar
ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 10: surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2005;20:27052707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, G, de Wert, G, Shenfield, F, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 15: Cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2182.Google Scholar
Fragkou, R. Common legal regulation of surrogacy: necessity or choice? In: Medically assisted Reproduction: Proposal for Common European Policy. Athens: Sakkoulas Publications, 2015, pp. 187 et seq.Google Scholar
Stoll, J. Surrogacy Arrangements and Legal Parenthood, Swedish Law in a Comparative Context. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2013, pp. 99 et seq.Google Scholar
Swedish National Council on Medical Ethics. Assisted reproduction – ethical aspects. Report summary. 2013. Available at: www.smer.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Slutversion-sammanfattning-eng-Assisted-reproduction.pdf.Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers. Legislation on Biotechnology in the Nordic Countries: An Overview 2014. Copenhagen: Nordforsk, 2014.Google Scholar
Pluym, L. Mennesson v. France and Labassee v. France: surrogate motherhood across borders. 2014. Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2014/07/16/mennesson-v-france-and-labassee-v-france-surrogate-motherhood-across-borders.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×