Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:04:51.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 56 - Genetics and Gynaecological Disease

from Section 11 - Public Health Issues in Gynaecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona-Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

The large number of gene–disease associations that have been discovered through the use of high-throughput genomics have revolutionized our understanding of complex disease biology. Genomics holds ample scope from the clinical perspective, particularly with regards to disease risk prediction, improving disease classification, risk stratification and drug selection. Elucidating the functional impact of genomic variants is a critical challenge that should further facilitate the ‘bench to bedside’ translation. Additionally, healthcare systems need to acknowledge the necessity of updating and adapting current practices to ensure direct and cost-effective translation of modern genomics to the clinic.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bulletti, C, Coccia, ME, Battistoni, S, Borini, A. Endometriosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27:441447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burney, RO, Giudice, LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2012;98:511519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, JL, Elias, S, Malinak, LR, Buttram, VC. Heritable aspects of endometriosis: I. Genetic studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:327331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapkota, Y, Steinthorsdottir, V, Morris, AP, et al. Meta-analysis identifies five novel loci associated with endometriosis highlighting key genes involved in hormone metabolism. Nat Commun 2017;8:15539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vikhlyaeva, EM, Khodzhaeva, ZS, Fantschenko, ND. Familial predisposition to uterine leiomyomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;51:127131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cha, P-C, Takahashi, A, Hosono, N, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with susceptibility to uterine fibroids. Nat Genetics 2011;43:447450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellwege, JN, Jeff, JM, Wise, LA, et al. A multi-stage genome-wide association study of uterine fibroids in African Americans. Hum Genet 2017;136:13631373.Google Scholar
Rafnar, T, Gunnarsson, B, Stefansson, OA, et al. Variants associating with uterine leiomyoma highlight genetic background shared by various cancers and hormone-related traits. Nat Commun 2018;9:3636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodge, JC, Morton, CC. Genetic heterogeneity among uterine leiomyomata: insights into malignant progression. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16:R713.Google Scholar
Sandberg, AA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: leiomyoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2005;158:126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomlinson, IPM, Alam, NA, Rowan, AJ, et al. Germline mutations in FH predispose to dominantly inherited uterine fibroids, skin leiomyomata and papillary renal cell cancer. Nat Genet 2002;30:406410.Google Scholar
Ding, T, Hardiman, PJ, Petersen, I, et al. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in reproductive-aged women of different ethnicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017;8:9635196358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vink, JM, Sadrzadeh, S, Lambalk, CB, Boomsma, DI. Heritability of polycystic ovary syndrome in a Dutch twin-family study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:21002104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coviello, AD, Sam, S, Legro, RS, Dunaif, A. High prevalence of metabolic syndrome in first-degree male relatives of women with polycystic ovary syndrome is related to high rates of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:43614366.Google Scholar
Barber, TM, Bennett, AJ, Groves, CJ, et al. Disparate genetic influences on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and type 2 diabetes revealed by a lack of association between common variants within the TCF7L2 gene and PCOS. Diabetologia 2007;50:23182322.Google Scholar
Shen, W-J, Li, T-R, Hu, Y-J, Liu, H-B, Song, M. Relationships between TCF7L2 genetic polymorphisms and polycystic ovary syndrome risk: a meta-analysis. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2014;12:210219.Google Scholar
Wojciechowski, P, Lipowska, A, Rys, P, et al. Impact of FTO genotypes on BMI and weight in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2012;55:26362645.Google Scholar
Xita, N, Tsatsoulis, A, Chatzikyriakidou, A, Georgiou, I. Association of the (TAAAA)n repeat polymorphism in the sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) gene with polycystic ovary syndrome and relation to SHBG serum levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:59765980.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, A, Ikonomi, E, Dimou, NL, Douma, L, Bagos, PG. Polymorphisms of the insulin receptor and the insulin receptor substrates genes in polycystic ovary syndrome: a Mendelian randomization meta-analysis. Mol Genet Metab 2010;99:174183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, L, Luo, J, Peng, Q, et al. Lack of association of INS VNTR polymorphism with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31:675681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, M, Xiao, J, Zhao, X, Liu, C, Chen, Q. Four polymorphisms of the CAPN 10 gene and their relationship to polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012;76:431438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z-J, Zhao, H, He, L, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for polycystic ovary syndrome on chromosome 2p16.3, 2p21 and 9q33.3. Nat Genet 2011;43:5559.Google Scholar
Shi, Y, Zhao, H, Shi, Y, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight new risk loci for polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Genet 2012;44:10201025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, F, Karaderi, T, Jones, MR, et al. Large-scale genome-wide meta-analysis of polycystic ovary syndrome suggests shared genetic architecture for different diagnosis criteria. PLoS Genet 2018;14:e1007813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okuda, T, Sekizawa, A, Purwosunu, Y, et al. Genetics of endometrial cancers. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010;2010:984013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kloor, M, von Knebel Doeberitz, M. The immune biology of microsatellite-unstable cancer. Trends Cancer 2016;2:121133.Google Scholar
Hampel, H, Frankel, WL, Martin, E, et al. Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). N Engl J Med 2005;352:18511860.Google Scholar
Sehgal, R, Sheahan, K, O’Connell, PR, et al. Lynch syndrome: an updated review. Genes (Basel) 2014;5:497507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, TH, Thompson, DJ, O’Mara, TA, et al. Five endometrial cancer risk loci identified through genome-wide association analysis. Nat Genet 2016;48:667674.Google Scholar
Ferla, R, Calò, V, Cascio, S, et al. Founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Ann Oncol 2007;18(Suppl. 6):vi93vi98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrij-Bosch, A, Peelen, T, van Vliet, M, et al. BRCA1 genomic deletions are major founder mutations in Dutch breast cancer patients. Nat Genet 1997;17:341345.Google Scholar
Chen, S, Parmigiani, G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:13291333.Google Scholar
Antoniou, A, Pharoah, PDP, Narod, S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:11171130.Google Scholar
Begg, CB, Haile, RW, Borg, A, et al. Variation of breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. JAMA 2008;299:194201.Google Scholar
Petrucelli, N, Daly, MB, Feldman, GL. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genet Med 2010;12:245259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unger, MA, Nathanson, KL, Calzone, K, et al. Screening for genomic rearrangements in families with breast and ovarian cancer identifies BRCA1 mutations previously missed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis or sequencing. Am J Hum Genet 2000;67:841850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, BK, Copson, E, Maishman, T, Abraham, JE, Eccles, DM. Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists. BMC Cancer 2015;15:936.Google Scholar
Plon, SE, Eccles, DM, Easton, D, et al. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 2008;29:12821291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×