Book contents
- Early Latin
- Early Latin
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction: What Is ‘Early Latin’?
- Part I The Epigraphic Material
- Part II Drama
- Part III Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
- Chapter 13 The Language of Early Latin Epic
- Chapter 14 Early Latin Prayers and Aspects of Coordination
- Chapter 15 Some Syntactic Features of Latin Legal Texts
- Chapter 16 Repetition in the Fragmentary Orators
- Chapter 17 How ‘Early Latin’ Is Lucilius?
- Chapter 18 Greek Influences on Cato’s Latin
- Chapter 19 Greek Loanwords in ‘Early Latin’
- Part IV Reception
- Bibliography
- Index Verborum
- Index of Non-Latin Words
- Index Locorum Potiorum
- Subject Index
Chapter 15 - Some Syntactic Features of Latin Legal Texts
from Part III - Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2023
- Early Latin
- Early Latin
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction: What Is ‘Early Latin’?
- Part I The Epigraphic Material
- Part II Drama
- Part III Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
- Chapter 13 The Language of Early Latin Epic
- Chapter 14 Early Latin Prayers and Aspects of Coordination
- Chapter 15 Some Syntactic Features of Latin Legal Texts
- Chapter 16 Repetition in the Fragmentary Orators
- Chapter 17 How ‘Early Latin’ Is Lucilius?
- Chapter 18 Greek Influences on Cato’s Latin
- Chapter 19 Greek Loanwords in ‘Early Latin’
- Part IV Reception
- Bibliography
- Index Verborum
- Index of Non-Latin Words
- Index Locorum Potiorum
- Subject Index
Summary
Legal texts from the early period contain a number of peculiarities that are not common in classical and post-classical Latin. The chapter discusses some of them: relative clauses introduced by a relative phrase, subjunctive mood, restrictive quod and subordinators introducing impediment argument clauses (quo minus and quo setius). Legalisms represent a subtype of early Latin phenomena in that they need not be features of every text found in that period; they are restricted to legal documents as a specific text type. Some of them are true legal archaisms (siremps, quo setius) – and they can be easily identified as such – that continue to be used in the same text type after the pre-classical period or appear in other text types in a legal context. As for the remaining ones: autonomous relative clauses introduced by a relative phrase and those containing a subjunctive for factual content as well as restrictive quod clauses can be at least considered as characteristic of legal Latin.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Early LatinConstructs, Diversity, Reception, pp. 311 - 326Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023