Book contents
- Early Latin
- Early Latin
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction: What Is ‘Early Latin’?
- Part I The Epigraphic Material
- Part II Drama
- Chapter 5 Metre
- Chapter 6 Morphology and Syntax
- Chapter 7 Support Verb Constructions in Plautus and Terence
- Chapter 8 Ecquis in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 9 Indirect Questions in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 10 Latin edepol ‘by Pollux!’
- Chapter 11 Early Latin Lexicon in Terence (and Plautus)
- Chapter 12 A Comparison of the Language of Tragedy and Comedy in Early Latin Drama
- Part III Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
- Part IV Reception
- Bibliography
- Index Verborum
- Index of Non-Latin Words
- Index Locorum Potiorum
- Subject Index
Chapter 6 - Morphology and Syntax
from Part II - Drama
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2023
- Early Latin
- Early Latin
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction: What Is ‘Early Latin’?
- Part I The Epigraphic Material
- Part II Drama
- Chapter 5 Metre
- Chapter 6 Morphology and Syntax
- Chapter 7 Support Verb Constructions in Plautus and Terence
- Chapter 8 Ecquis in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 9 Indirect Questions in ‘Early Latin’
- Chapter 10 Latin edepol ‘by Pollux!’
- Chapter 11 Early Latin Lexicon in Terence (and Plautus)
- Chapter 12 A Comparison of the Language of Tragedy and Comedy in Early Latin Drama
- Part III Other Genres and Fragmentary Authors
- Part IV Reception
- Bibliography
- Index Verborum
- Index of Non-Latin Words
- Index Locorum Potiorum
- Subject Index
Summary
This chapter examines the history of the most frequent metres in early Latin comedy, iambic senarii and trochaic septenarii. While persisting into the classical period, these metres become less prominent; early funerary epigrams can still be composed in iambic senarii, but elegiacs predominate, and there are also significant changes in prosody and versification rules. No sharp chronological contrast is observed in the tradition of dramatic iambo-trochaics. The main differences between early and classical iambo-trochaics are not metrical, but prosodic; they consist above all in the elimination or reduction of prosodic variants, such as original length of vowel endings (-āt for -ăt), iambic shortening, sigmatic ecthlipsis; these phenomena are common in Plautus but absent, e.g., from Varro and Phaedrus. Conversely, lengthening with muta cum liquida, which is absent from comedy, is well attested in imperial iambo-trochaics, including e.g. Phaedrus and inscriptions. Even in this respect, however, one should be wary of neat chronological generalisations, especially because the reduction of prosodic variants is already attested in early authors such as Terence.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Early LatinConstructs, Diversity, Reception, pp. 100 - 117Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
- 1
- Cited by