Gulliver, Goliath and Goldilocks

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139019484.005

4 - Gulliver, Goliath and Goldilocks

young children and scale errors

from Part I - The bodily self

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2011

Judy S. DeLoache and

David H. Uttal

Edited by

Virginia Slaughter and

Celia A. Brownell

Show author details

Virginia Slaughter: Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Celia A. Brownell: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Consider the familiar story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. When this famous folklore heroine entered the home of the three-member ursine family after having been lost and wandering through the woods for some time, she was desperately tired. Spying a set of three chairs, she decided to sit down to rest. She first tried to sit in the biggest one, but found that it was far too high for her to get onto. She discovered that the second chair was much too wide to be comfortable for her small body. Finally, trying the third, the smallest, chair, she was relieved that it was “just right” for her and promptly sat down.

In Goldilocks’ efforts to seek comfort in the home of the bears, her actions were regulated by her visual recognition that certain of the objects present belonged to the familiar category, “chair.” Having correctly categorized those objects, and feeling fatigued, she went about using them in the standard way. Her initial two attempts to sit down were foiled by the inappropriate size of two of the chairs for a little girl. Only the third was appropriately scaled to the size of her body and therefore (in the terms of Gibson, 1977) offered an affordance for sitting.

Type: Chapter
Information: Early Development of Body Representations , pp. 59 - 68

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019484.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adolph, K. E. 2005 Learning to learn in the development of actionLockman, J.Rieser, J.Nelson, C. A.Action as an Organizer of Perception and Cognition during Learning and Development: Minnesota Symposium on child DevelopmentHillsdale, NJErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Adolph, K. E.Berger, S. A. 2006 Motor developmentDamon, W.Lerner, R.Kuhn, D.Siegler, R. S.Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. II: Cognition, Perception, and LanguageNew YorkWileyGoogle Scholar

Brownell, C. A.Zerwas, S.Ramani, G. B. 2007 “So big”: The development of body self-awareness in toddlersChild Development 78 1,426CrossRef Google Scholar

Carlson, S. M.Davis, A.Leach, J. G. 2005 Less is more: Executive function and symbolic representation in preschool childrenPsychological Science 16 609CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DeLoache, J. S. 2010 Everyday scale errorsDevelopmental Science 13 28Google Scholar

DeLoache, J. S.Uttal, D. H.Rosengren, K. S. 2004 Scale errors offer evidence for a perception–action dissociation early in lifeScience 304 1,027CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gibson, J. J. 1977 The theory of affordancesShaw, R.Bransford, J.Perceiving, Acting, and KnowingHillsdale, NJErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Mandler, J.DeLoache, J. S.Pauen, S.

Milner, A. D.Goodale, M. A. 1995 The Visual Brain in ActionNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Rosengren, K. S.Schein, S. S.Gutierrez, I. T. 2010 Individual differences in children’s production of scale errorsInfant Behavior and Development 33 309CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ware, E. A.Uttal, D. H.DeLoache, J. S. 2010 Everyday scale errorsDevelopmental Science 13 28CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed