Book contents
- Dynamic Pathways to Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- Dynamic Pathways to Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Micro Level
- Part II Meso Level
- Part III Macro Level
- 16 Recovery Communities
- 17 Disparities in Alcohol Treatment Access in Rural Areas
- 18 Recovery, Communities, and the Organized Recovery Movement
- 19 Alcohol Control Policy and Regulations to Promote Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- 20 Causal Inference Approaches to Studying Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- 21 Building on Collaborative Research to Co-Design SURE Recovery, a Mobile Application for People with Experience of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems
- 22 Economic Methods Used to Evaluate Recovery Programs for Alcohol Use Disorder
- Conclusions and Future Directions
- Index
- References
16 - Recovery Communities
Resources and Settings
from Part III - Macro Level
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2021
Book contents
- Dynamic Pathways to Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- Dynamic Pathways to Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Micro Level
- Part II Meso Level
- Part III Macro Level
- 16 Recovery Communities
- 17 Disparities in Alcohol Treatment Access in Rural Areas
- 18 Recovery, Communities, and the Organized Recovery Movement
- 19 Alcohol Control Policy and Regulations to Promote Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- 20 Causal Inference Approaches to Studying Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
- 21 Building on Collaborative Research to Co-Design SURE Recovery, a Mobile Application for People with Experience of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems
- 22 Economic Methods Used to Evaluate Recovery Programs for Alcohol Use Disorder
- Conclusions and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
The chapter presents a range of research evidence that supports a social model of recovery from substance use disorders and combines them into a conceptual framework for building recovery capital across the course of the recovery journey. The model is predicated on the mental health recovery concept of CHIME (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning and Empowerment) combined with positive social connections (often involving peer-based support), resulting in a belief in change that enables an individual to engage in meaningful activities. These developments in turn can generate a virtuous cycle of empowerment, positive self-efficacy, and self-esteem that promote a positive social identity that is sustained through engagement in prosocial recovery and community groups and activities. At a collective level, this has benefits for communities and cities in generating new connections and greater access to resources that result in improved community capital and Recovery Cities.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dynamic Pathways to Recovery from Alcohol Use DisorderMeaning and Methods, pp. 303 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Aldridge, J., Measham, F. & Parker, H. (2011) Illegal leisure revisited: Changing patterns of alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults. Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckwith, M., Best, D., Lubman, D., Dingle, G. & Perryman, C. (2015). Predictors of flexibility in social identity among people entering a therapeutic community for substance abuse. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2015.982465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, D. (2019). Pathways to desistance and recovery: The role of the social contagion of hope. Policy Press.Google Scholar
Best, D., Beckwith, M., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Mawson, E., & Lubman, D. I. (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, D. & Colman, C. (2019). Desistance and recovery special issue – introduction and overview, Addiction Research and Theory, 27(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1535059Google Scholar
Best, D., Ghufran, S., Day, E., Ray, R. & Loaring, J. (2008). Breaking the habit: A retrospective analysis of desistance factors among formerly problematic heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230802392808Google Scholar
Best, D., Gow, J., Taylor, A., Knox, A. & White, W. (2011). Recovery from heroin or alcohol dependence: A qualitative account of the recovery experience in Glasgow. Journal of Drug Issues, 41(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204261104100303Google Scholar
Best, D., Haslam, C., Staiger, P., Dingle, G., Savic, M., Bathish, R., Mackenzie, J., Beckwith, M., & Lubman, D. I. (2016). Social networks and recovery (SONAR): Characteristics of a longitudinal outcome study in five therapeutic communities in Australia. Therapeutic Communities: International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 37(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-04-2016-0012Google Scholar
Betty Ford Institute Consensus Group (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 221–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001Google Scholar
Bickel, W. K., & Vuchinich, R. E. (2000). Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Biernacki, P. (1986). Pathways from heroin addiction: Recovery without treatment. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.Google Scholar
Burnett, R., & Maruna, S. (2004). So “prison works,” does it? The criminal careers of 130 men released from prison under Home Secretary, Michael Howard. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4): 390–404. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00337.xGoogle Scholar
Cano, I., Best, D., Edwards, M. & Lehman, J. (2017). Recovery capital pathways: Mapping the components of recovery well-being. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.002Google Scholar
Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. (2010). Connected: The amazing power of social networks and how they shape our lives. Harper Press.Google Scholar
Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2009). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use and Misuse, 43(12–13), 1971–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802289762Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Foss, M. & Scott, C. (2007). An eight-year perspective on the relationship between the duration of abstinence and other aspects of recovery. Evaluation Review, 31(6), 585–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X07307771Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Scott, C., & Laudet, A. (2014). Beyond bricks and mortars: Recent research on substance abuse disorder recovery management. Current Psychiatry Report, 16(4), 442. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0442-3Google Scholar
Dingle, G., Stark, C., Cruwys, T. & Best, D. (2015). Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12081CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granfield, R. & Cloud, W. (2001). Social context and “natural recovery”: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Substance Use &Misuse, 36(11), 1543–1570. https://doi.org/ 10.1081/ja-100106963Google Scholar
Groshkova, T., Best, D., & White, W. (2012). The assessment of recovery capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.xGoogle Scholar
Haslam, C., Best, D., Dingle, G., Staiger, G., Savic, M., Bathish, R., Mackenzie, J., Beckwith, M., Kelly, A. & Lubman, D. (2019). Social group membership before treatment for substance dependence predicts early identification and engagement with treatment communities. Addiction Research and Theory, 27(5), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018/1537393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, K., & Lembke, A. (2013). Recovery-oriented policy and care systems in the UK and USA. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12092Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Branscombe, N., Haslam, S., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Jones, J., & Zhang, A. (2015). Having a lot of a good thing: Multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem. PLoS One, 10(5), e0131035. https://doi.org/0.1371/journal.pone.0124609Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.) (2012). The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, J., Bergman, B., Hoeppner, B., Vilsaint, C., & White, W. (2017). Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: Implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.028Google Scholar
Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2011). A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 445–452. https://doi.org/ 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733Google Scholar
Litt, M. D., Kadden, R. M., Kabela-Cormier, E., & Petry, N. (2007). Changing network support for drinking: Initial findings from the Network Support Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 542–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, C. (2010). Sinning and sinned against: The stigmatization of problem drug users. The UK Drug Policy Commission.Google Scholar
Longabaugh, R., Beattie, M., Noel, N., Stout, R., & Malloy, P. (1993). The effect of social investment on treatment outcome. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1993.54.465Google Scholar
Longabaugh, R., Wirtz, P. W., Zywiak, W. H., & O’Malley, S. S. (2010). Network support as a prognostic indicator of drinking outcomes: The COMBINE study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(6), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2010.71.837Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. & McKeganey, N. (2000). Addicts’ narratives of recovery from drug use: Constructing a non-addict identity. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277–9536(99)00409-8Google Scholar
Moos, R. H. (2007). Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88(2–3): 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.010.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, A (2016). Chillin’, buzzin’, getting mangled, and coming down: Doing differentiated normalization in risk environments. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 247–254.Google Scholar
Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998) Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. Routledge.Google Scholar
Pienaar, K., & Dilkes-Frayne, E (2017). Telling different stories, making new realities: The ontological politics of “addiction” biographies, International Journal of Drug Policy, 44, 145–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.011Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, P. (2011). Motherhood, pregnancy, and the negotiation of identity: The moral career of drug treatment. Social Science & Medicine, 72(6), 984–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.017Google Scholar
Sheedy, C. & Whitter, M. (2009) Guiding principles and elements of recovery-oriented systems of care: What do we know from the research? (HHS Publication No. (SMA) 09-4439). Substance Abuse, and Mental Health Services Administration. www.naadac.org/assets/2416/sheedyckwhitterm2009_guiding_principles_and_elements.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Turner, J., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, MS. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.Google Scholar
UK Drug Policy Commission (2008). The UK drug policy commission recovery consensus group: A vision of recovery. UK Drug Policy Commission.Google Scholar
White, W. (2012). Recovery/remission from substance use disorders: An analysis of reported outcomes in 415 scientific reports. Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual Disability Services and the Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center.Google Scholar
White, W. (2009). Peer-based addiction recovery support: History, theory, practice, and scientific evaluation. Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center and Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services.Google Scholar
White, W., & Cloud, W. (2008). Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counselor, 9(5), 22–27.Google Scholar