1 - Contemporary enquiries into a long-standing domain: Drawing research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Summary
drawing behaviour has occupied European psychologists from the turn of the last century (Kerschensteiner, 1905; Luquet, 1927; Ricci, 1887; Rouma, 1913), maintained their interest ever since, and subsequently also attracted some attention from psychologists in other continents such as the United States. The main contribution of the early work was to describe how this typically human behaviour develops, and in particular which stages it follows (Piaget and Inhelder, 1956). Still, perhaps like many other scientists nowadays, Piaget saw drawing only as a figurative, illustrative instrument of representation, as opposed to rational and operational thought devoted to the genuine understanding of reality. Thus, drawing behaviour was not frequently studied in relation to cognitive development. However, a notable exception was the ‘Draw-a-person test’ designed by Goodenough (Goodenough, 1926; Goodenough and Harris, 1950) which assesses mental age in children via the human figure drawing, and, because it has a high correlation with intelligence tests until adolescence, it is still in use today.
Since the 1970s and 1980s, a refreshed interest in drawing from developmental and cognitive psychologists from an empirical, experimental, statistically underpinned perspective has flourished, as evident in two books by Freeman (Freeman, 1980, see also his current contribution to this book; Freeman and Cox, 1985).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Drawing and the Non-Verbal MindA Life-Span Perspective, pp. 1 - 20Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, , , , , , and (2006). Drawing impairment predicts mortality in severe COPD. Chest, 130, 1687–94.Google Scholar
and (1985). Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 21, 963–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Conflict between canonicality and array-specificity in young children's drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968). Comparison of children's self-drawing with their drawings of other persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergely, G. (2006). The development of understanding self and agency. In (ed.), Childhood cognitive development (pp. 26–46). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1973). Children's representation of the human figure: the effects of models, media and instruction. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 87, 197–251.Google Scholar
and (1950). Studies in the psychology of children's drawings. Ⅱ. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 369–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1973). The ‘grammar of action’: sequence and syntax in children's copying behaviour. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Young children's recognition and description of their own and others’ drawings. Developmental Science, 2, 476–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition. Vision Research, 46, 4024–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Delay-induced bias in children's memory for location. Child Development, 73, 829–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). The stability and flexibility of spatial categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2003). Parieto-frontal networks for clock drawing revealed with fMRI. Neuroscience Research, 45, 71–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990). Constraints on representational change: evidence from children's drawings. Cognition, 34, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). Figuring out drawing-induced epilepsy. Neurology, 66, 723–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1998). Pressure, velocity and time in speeded drawing of basic graphic pattern by young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1299–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (1995). Drawing and looking. London: Pearson/Prentice Hall (distributed by www.amazon.co.uk).Google Scholar
Liben, L. S. (1988). Conceptual issues in the development of spatial cognition. In , and (eds.), Spatial cognition: brain bases and development (pp. 167–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, and (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: a comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , and (2003). Relationship between clock-drawing and neuropsychological and functional status in elderly institutionalized patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 621–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2003). Both parietal lobes are involved in drawing: a functional MRI study and implications for constructional apraxia. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 338–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, J. M. (1988). The development of spatial cognition: on topological and euclidian representation. In , and (eds.), Spatial cognition: brain bases and development (pp. 423–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, , , and (2004). Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 939–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003). Making space: the development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, , , , , and (2006). Functional MRI reveals activation of a subcortical network in a 5-year-old girl with genetically confirmed myoclonus-dystonia. Neuropediatrics, 37, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). Levels of analysis in motor control. Brain Research, 71, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, D. J. (1995). The unduplicated self. In (ed.), The self in infancy: theory and research (pp. 161–92). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
and (1998). Young children's understanding of briefly versus extremely delayed images of the self: emergence of the autobiographical stance. Developmental Psychology, 34, 188–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1995). Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements in 3- to 5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 31, 626–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1913). Le langage graphique de l'enfant [The graphic language of children]. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
(1996). Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception in infancy. Infant Behaviour and Development, 19, 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). Nadia: a case of extraordinary drawing ability in an autistic child. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1983). Normal and anomalous representational drawing ability in children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selfe, L. (1985). Anomalous drawing development. In and (eds.), Visual order: the nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 135–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1993). The drawing of objects by a visual form agnosic: contribution of surface properties and memorial representations. Neuropsychologia, 31, 251–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001). Brain activities in a skilled versus a novice artist: an fMRI study. Leonardo, 34, 31–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 432–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998). The role of strategic visual attention in children's drawing development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children's drawings. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
Thomassen, A. J. W. M. and Van Galen, G. P. (1992). Handwriting as a motor task. In (ed.), Approaches to the study of motor control and learning (pp. 113–44). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
, and (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: implication for reading development and theory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 559–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Drawing and cognition: descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 117–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willats, J. (1985). Drawing systems revisited: the role of denotation systems in children's figure drawings. In and (eds.), Visual order (pp. 78–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willats, J. (1995). An information-processing approach to drawing development. In and (eds.), Drawing and looking (pp. 27–43). London: Pearson/Prentice Hall (distributed by www.amazon.co.uk).Google Scholar
Willats, J. (2005). Making sense of children's drawings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
and (1982). The case of the disappearing of the two-eyed profile or how little children influence the drawings of little children. Review of Research in Visual Arts Education, 15, 19–32.Google Scholar
and (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 987–1006.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by