Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:17:58.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Backward look

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

R. A. Bailey
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Randomization

Although randomization is generally regarded as essential, there is less agreement on how to carry it out and on how to verify whether any proposed randomization procedure achieves its objectives. Here I discuss some possibilities.

Random sampling

Many statistics textbooks give the impression that every collection of observations is a random sample. This is rarely the case for designed experiments. Experimental resources are too valuable for us to choose a random subset and ignore the rest. We use the experimental units which are to hand in the laboratory or the field, or we use all suitable volunteers in a clinical trial. In a small trial it is more important that the experimental units be reasonably similar than that they be random, and in a large trial it may be more important that they be representative. If the experimental units are to be working farms, then stratified random sampling can give a representative sample, but in practice we can still use only those farms whose farmer is willing to participate in the experiment.

Example 14.1 (Small trial on volunteers) In Question 2.1, the psychologist needs to choose as his experimental units eleven of the students listed in Table 2.7. For such a small trial, he should choose people of the same sex and approximately the same age. A random sample of eleven people would almost certainly be more variable, giving him less power to detect any treatment difference.

The chief situation in which random sampling plays a role in experimentation is when observational units are much smaller than experimental units.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Backward look
  • R. A. Bailey, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Design of Comparative Experiments
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611483.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Backward look
  • R. A. Bailey, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Design of Comparative Experiments
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611483.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Backward look
  • R. A. Bailey, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Design of Comparative Experiments
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611483.015
Available formats
×