Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:46:38.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Statistical concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Simon T. Bate
Affiliation:
GlaxoSmithKline
Robin A. Clark
Affiliation:
Huntingdon Life Sciences
Get access

Summary

Before we describe the experimental designs and statistical analyses that may be of use to the researcher, a few fundamental concepts are introduced. While many researchers are familiar with these concepts, they are the foundation for the arguments that follow and hence are considered first.

Decision-making: the signal-to- noise ratio

Arguably the primary role of the statistical analysis of an animal experiment is to allow the scientist to draw reliable conclusions from the results obtained. Statistics provides the decision-maker with a framework for achieving this. Importantly it also quantifies the confidence that should be placed in that decision.

Example 2.1: Plasma glucose level

Consider the following two experiments, designed to assess the effect of two treatments A and B, on reducing plasma glucose levels in diabetic mice. Treatment A was tested in experiment 1, treatment B in experiment 2. Both studies also included a control group to allow a test of the treatment effect. The plasma glucose level of the two control groups was around 280 mg/dL. Animals dosed with treatment A had an average plasma glucose level of 227 mg/dL whereas those dosed with treatment B had an average of 185 mg/dL. Without any further information it appears that treatment B was more effective at decreasing plasma glucose level. A scatterplot of the four averages is presented in Figure 2.1.

But was this conclusion valid? It is always difficult to compare results across experiments, even if the control groups appear to be similar. Other effects, unique to each experiment, may be influencing the results. We shall comment further on this later, where it will be shown that other experimental designs may be more appropriate.

Assume that different researchers carried out the two experiments; a plot of the individual results is presented in Figure 2.2.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×