Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:48:34.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Pablo E. Navarro  and
Jorge L. Rodríguez
Pablo E. Navarro
Affiliation:
Blas Pascal University, Argentina
Jorge L. Rodríguez
Affiliation:
National University of Mar del Plata, Argentina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Deontic Logic and Legal Systems , pp. 245 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguiló Regla, Josep 1995: Sobre la derogación (México D.F.: Fontamara).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos 1969: “Logic of Norm and Logic of Normative Propositions,” Logique et Analyse 12, 47: 242–268.Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos 1982: “Normative Order and Derogation,” in Martino, A. (ed.), Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems, Vol. II (Dordrecht: North Holland Publishing Company, 51–60).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos 1986: “Conditionality and the Representation of Legal Norms,” in Martino, A. et al. (eds.), Automated Analysis of Legal Texts (North-Holland: Elsevier, 175–186).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos 1991: “Conflicts of Norms and the Revision of Normative Systems,” Law and Philosophy 10(4): 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos 1993: “Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals,” in Meyer and Wieringa 1993: 43–84.
Alchourrón, Carlos 1995: “Concepciones de la lógica,” in Alchourrón, C. et al. (eds.), Lógica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, 7 (Madrid: Trotta, 11–48).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos 1996: “Detachment and Defeasibility in Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 57: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1971: Normative Systems (Wein, New York: Springer Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1979: Sobre la existencia de las normas jurídicas (Venezuela: Universidad de Carabobo).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1981: “The Expressive Conception of Norms,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 95–124.
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1984: “Pragmatic Foundations for a Logic of Norms,” Rechtstheorie 15: 453–464.Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1988: “Perils of Level Confusion in Normative Discourse,” Rechtstheorie 19: 230–237.Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1989: “Von Wright on Deontic Logic and the Philosophy of Law,” in Schilpp, P. et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Illinois: Open Court, 665–693).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1991: Análisis lógico y derecho (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos, Gärdenfors, Peter, and Makinson, David 1985: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1981: “Hierarchies of Regulations and their Logic,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 125–148.
Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1982: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions,” Theoria 48(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1985: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Safe Contraction,” Studia Logica 44: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1986: “Maps between Some Different Kinds of Contraction Function: The Finite Case,” Studia Logica 45: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, Carlos and Martino, Antonio 1990: “Logic without Truth,” Ratio Iuris 3(1): 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Sherwin, Emily 2008: Demystifying Legal Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert 1986: Theorie der Grundrechte (Suhrkamp-Verlag).Google Scholar
Anderson, Alan Ross 1956: “The Formal Analysis of Normative Systems,” in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 147–213).Google Scholar
Anderson, Alan Ross 1958: “A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal logic,” Mind 67, 265: 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret 1957: Intention (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Åqvist, Lennart 1967: “Good Samaritans, contrary-to-duty imperatives and epistemic obligations,” Nôus 1: 361–379.Google Scholar
Åqvist, Lennart 1984: “Deontic Logic,” in Gabbay, D. and Guethner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume II: Extentions of Classical Logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 605–714), citations are to the 2002 second edition, volume 8 (The Netherlands: Kluwer, 147–264).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åqvist, Lennart 1987: Introduction to Deontic Logic and the Theory of Normative Systems (Napoli; Bibliopolis).Google Scholar
Atienza, Manuel and Manero, Juan Ruiz 1998: A Theory of Legal Sentences (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atria, Fernando 2001: On Law and Legal Reasoning (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984: Scepticism, Rules & Language (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Bayón, Juan Carlos 1991: La normatividad del derecho. Deber jurídico y razones para la acción (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
Beirlaen, Mathieu and Straßer, Christian 2013: “Two Adaptive Logics of Norm-propositions,” Journal of Applied Logic 11(2): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belnap, D. N. 1962: “Tonk, Plonk, and Plink,” Analysis 22 (6): 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belzer, Marvin and Loewer, Barry 1997: “Deontic Logics of Defeasibility,” in Nute 1997: 45–58.
Bentham, Jeremy 1872: Of Laws in General, citations are to the 1970 edition by Hart, H. L. A. (London: Athlone Press).Google Scholar
Bix, Brian 1993: Law, Language and Legal Determinacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1984: Spreading the Word (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1994: Making it Explicit, Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 1982: “Time and Validity,” in Martino, A. (ed.), Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems (Amsterdam, New York: North Holland Publishing Company, 51–63).Google Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 1985: “Norms and Logic,” Law and Philosophy 4 (2): 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 1986: “Legal Dogmatics and the Systematization of Law,” in Eckhoff, Torstein et al. (eds.), Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, Rechtstheorie 10: 193–210.Google Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 1991: “Algunas consideraciones sobre los sistemas jurídicos,” Doxa 9: 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 1994: “Lógica y normas,” Isonomía 1: 28–36.Google Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 1995: “Lógica deóntica,” in Alchourrón, C. et al. (eds.), Lógica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, volumen 7 (Madrid: Trotta, 129–142).Google Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio 2003: “On Legal Gaps,” Analisi e Diritto: 21–28.
Canale, Damiano and Tuzet, Giovanni 2007: “On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?”, Ratio Juris 20, N° 1: 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo, Ricardo 1988: El sistema jurídico. Problemas actuales (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Ricardo 1996: “Sistema jurídico,” in Garzón Valdés, E. and Laporta, F. (eds.), El derecho y la justicia (Madrid: Trotta, 161–176).Google Scholar
Carmo, José and Jones, Andrew J.I. 2002: “Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties,” in Gabbay, Dov M. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 8, 2nd edition (Netherlands: Kluwer, 265–343).
Carnota, Raúl and Rodríguez, Ricardo 2011: “AGM Theory and Artificial Intelligence,” in Olsson, E. et al. (eds.), Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Springer, 1–42).Google Scholar
Castañeda, Héctor Neri 1981: “The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in one Fell Swoop,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 37–85.
Castañeda, Héctor Neri 1986: “Obligations, Aspectual Actions and Circumstances,” Philosophical Papers 15: 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, Bruno 1999: La teoria del diritto di Hans Kelsen. Una introduzione critica (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
Chellas, Brian F. 1980: Modal Logic. An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick 1963: “Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic,” Analysis 34, 2: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Alonzo 1956: Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Church, Alonzo 1965: “The History of the Question of Existential Import for Categorical Propositions,” in Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences. Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 417–424).Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules 2000: “Constraints on the Criteria of Legality,” Legal Theory 6(2): 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules 2001: The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules and Leiter, Brian 1993: “Determinacy, Objectivity and Authority,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142(2): 549–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte d’Almeida, Luís 2011: “Legal Statements and Normative Language,” Law and Philosophy 30: 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1973: Frege. Philosphy of Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the 1981 second edition.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1991: The Logical Basis of Metaphysics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1977: Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1985: A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1986: Law’s Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 2006: Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart 1980: Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy 2000: Vagueness in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, Timothy 2003: “Raz on Gaps: the Surprising Part,” in Paulson, S. L. et al. (eds.), Rights, Culture, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–118).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Pascal 1989: La norme du vrai (Paris: Gallimard), citations are to the 1991 English edition, The Norm of Truth (New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi and Rodríguez, Jorge 2011: Jerarquías normativas y dinámica de los sistemas jurídicos (Madrid-Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons).Google Scholar
Feys, Richard 1937: “Les Logiques Nouvelles des Modalités,” Revue Néoscolastique de Philosophie 40: 517–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P. 1996: Basic Concepts of Legal Thought (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn and Hilpinen, Risto 1971: “Deontic Logic: An Introduction,” in Hilpinen 1971: 1–35.
Forrester, James William 1984: “Gentle Murder, or the Adverbial Samaritan,” The Journal of Philosophy 81, Num 4: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Friedrich Ludwig Gotlob 1919: “Die Verneinung. Eine Logische Untersuchung,” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I: 143–157, citations are to the 1977 English translation by Geach, P. and Stoothoff, R., “Negation,” in Logical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Gamut, L. T. F. 1991: Logic, Language, and Meaning. Volume 1: Introduction to Logic (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter 1990: “The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1: 24–46.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter 1992a: (ed.) Belief Revision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter 1992b: “The Dynamics of Normative Systems,” in Martino, A. (ed.), Expert Systems in Law (North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 293–299).Google Scholar
Gardner, John 2004: “The Legality of Law,” Ratio Juris 17(2): 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter T. 1965: “Assertion,” Philosophical Review 74: 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzen, Gerhard 1934: “Untersuchungen über das Logische Schliessen,” Mathematische Zeitschrift 39: 176–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianformaggio, Leticia 1991: (ed.) Sistemi Normativi Statici e Dinamici. Analisi di una Tipologia Kelseniana (Torino: Giapichelli).
Gibbard, Allan 2003: Thinking How to Live (Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Golding, Martin 1961: “Kelsen and the Concept of ‘Legal System,’ ” Archiv für Rechts und Sozialphilosophie 47: 355–364.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. 1997: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic, 3rd edition (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie 1999: “Positivism and Conventionalism,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia 1975: “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives,” Journal of Philosophy 72: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastini, Riccardo 1995: “Normas Supremas,” Doxa 17–18: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, Susan 1978: Philosophy of Logics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Bengt 1969: “An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,” Nous 3: 373–398; reprinted in Hilpinen 1971: 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove 1988: “Deontic Logic without Misleading Alethic Analogies,” Logique et Analyse 31: 337–370.Google Scholar
Hansson, Bengt 1992: “A Dyadic Representation of Belief,” in Gärdenfors, 1992a: 89–121.
Hansson, Bengt 1999: A Textbook of Belief Dynamics. Theory Change and Database Updating (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Bengt 2001: The Structure of Values and Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Bengt 2004: “A New Representation Theorem for Contranegative Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 77: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Bengt 2006, “Ideal Worlds – Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 82: 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove and Makinson, David 1997: “Applying Normative Rules with Restraint,” in Dalla Chiara, M. et al. (eds.) Logic and Scientific Method (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 313–332).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1979: Law and Legal Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1948: “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49, reprinted in Flew, A. G. N. (ed.), Logic and Language (First Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 145–166).Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1961: The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), citations are to the 1994 2nd edition, Raz, J. and Bullock, P (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1962: “Kelsen Visited,” UCLA Law Review 10: 709–728.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1982: Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1983: Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hartney, Michael 1991: “Introduction. The Final Form of the Pure Theory of Law,” in Kelsen, H., General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ix–liii).Google Scholar
Hedenius, Ingmar 1941: Om rätt och moral (Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand).Google Scholar
Hilpinen, Risto 1971: (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel).CrossRef
Hilpinen, Risto 1981a: (ed.) New Studies in Deontic Logic (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel).CrossRef
Hilpinen, Risto 1981b: “On Normative Change,” in Morscher, E. et al. (eds.), Ethics: Foundations, Problems and Applications (Wein: Hölder-Pichier-Tempsky, 155–164).
Hilpinen, Risto 1987: “Conflict and Change in Norm Systems,” in Frändberg, A. et al. (eds.), The Structure of Law (Uppsala: Iustus Forlag, 37–49).
Hilpinen, Risto 2001: “Deontic Logic,” in Globe, Lou (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic (Oxford: Blackwell, 159–182).
Hintikka, Jaakko 1957: “Quantifiers in Deontic Logic,” Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Literarum XXIII, 4: 1–23.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko 1971: “Some Main Problems in Deontic Logic,” in Hilpinen 1971: 59–104.
Hofstadter, Albert and McKinsey, J. C. C. 1939: “On the Logic of Imperatives,” Philosophy of Science 6, Num. 4: 446–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881: The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown & Co), citations are to the 2005 edition (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
Hughes, George Edward and Cresswell, Maxwell John 1996: A New Introduction to Modal Logic (London, New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Susan 1989: Natural Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Jakson, Frank 1985: “On the Semantics and Logic of Obligation,” Mind 94: 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakson, Frank and Pargetter, Robert 1986: “Oughts, Options, and Actualism,” Philosophical Review 95: 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Jørgen 1937–1938: “Imperatives and Logic,” Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, George 1967: Le probleme de la vérité en morale et en droit (Lyon: Emmanuel Vitte).Google Scholar
Kanger, Stig 1957: New Foundations for Ethical Theory (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell), reprinted in Hilpinen 1971: 36–58.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1781: “Preface to the Second Edition” to The Critique of Pure Reason (Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch), citations are to The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, translated and edited in 1998 by Guyer, P. and Wood, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 1945: General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 1960: Pure Theory of Law, 2nd edition, citations are to the 1989 English version (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 1979: Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Wien: Manzsche Verlags und Universitätsbuchhandlung) citations are to the 1991 English edition General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans and Klug, Ulrich 1981: Rechtsnormen und logische Analyse (Wien: Verlag Franz Deuticke).Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1959: “A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 24(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1963: “Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Propositional Calculi,” Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1982: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1672: Elementa iuris naturalis, citations are to the 1930 edition (Darmstadt: Otto Reichl Verlag).Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1973: Counterfactuals (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1974: “Semantical Analysis for Dyadic Deontic Logic,” in Stanlund, S. (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, Synthese Library, (Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel, 1–14).Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1979: “A Problem about Permission,” in Saarinen, E. et al. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka (Dordrecht: Reidel, 163–175).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1986: On the Plurality of Worlds (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Lindahl, Lars 1992: “Conflicts in Systems of Legal Norms: A Logical Point of View,” in Brouwer, P. et al. (eds.), Coherence and Conflict in Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 39–64).Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1930: The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study (Oceana: New York).Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald 1993: Legislative Intent and Other Essays on Law, Politics, and Morality (Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil 1978: Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press), citations are to the 1994 new edition with revised foreword (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil 1995: “Defeasibility in Law and Logic,” in Bankowski, Z. et al. (eds.), Informatics and the Foundation of Legal Reasoning (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 99–117).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makinson, David 1993: “Five Faces of Minimality,” Studia Logica 52: 339–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makinson, David 1996: “In Memoriam Carlos Eduardo Alchourrón,” Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1(1): 3–10.Google Scholar
Makinson, David 1999: “On a Fundamental Problem of Deontic Logic,” in McNamara and Prakken 1999: 29–54.
Makinson, David 2005: Bridges from Classical to Non-monotonic Logic (London: King’s College Publications).Google Scholar
Makinson, David 2008: Sets, Logic and Maths for Computing (London: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert 2000: “Input-output Logics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 29: 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert 2001: “Constraints for Input-output Logics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2): 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert 2003: “Permission from an Input-output Perspective,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 32: 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei 1992: Interpretation and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Marmor, Andrei 2001: Positive Law and Objective Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei 2009: Social Conventions: From Language to Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, R. N. 1955: “Further Problems of Derived Obligations,” Mind 64: 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Paul 2006: “Deontic Logic,” in Gabbay, D. et al. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7 (The Neatherlands: Elsevier).Google Scholar
McNamara, Paul and Prakken, Henry 1999: (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems (Amsterdan; Berlin; Oxford; Tokyo; Washington, DC: IOS Press).
Meyer, John Jules Charles and Wieringa, Roel 1993: (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification (Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley & Sons).
Montague, Richard 1960: “Logical Necessity, Physical Necessity, Ethics, and Quantifiers,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosphy, vol. 3: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903: Principia Ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Moreso, José Juan 1998: Legal Indeterminacy and Constitutional Interpretation (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreso, José Juan and Navarro, Pablo 1993: Orden jurídico y sistema jurídico. Una investigación sobre la identidad y la dinámica de los sistemas jurídicos (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
Moreso, José Juan and Navarro, Pablo 1997: “Applicability and Effectiveness of Legal Norms,” Law and Philosophy 16(2): 201–219.Google Scholar
Moreso, José Juan and Navarro, Pablo 1998: “The Reception of Norms and Open Legal Systems,” in Paulson, S. L. and Litschewesky, B. (eds.), Normativity and Norms. Critical perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–291).Google Scholar
Moreso, José Juan, Navarro, Pablo and Redondo, María Cristina 2001: “Sobre la lógica de las lagunas en el derecho,” Crítica 33(99): 47–73.Google Scholar
Munzer, Stephen 1973: “Validity and Legal Conflicts,” The Yale Law Journal, 82: 1140–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Pablo, Orunesu, Claudina, Rodríguez, Jorge, and Sucar, Germán 2004: “Applicability of Legal Norms,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XVII (2): 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, Carlos 1984: Introducción al análisis del derecho (Buenos Aires: Astrea).Google Scholar
Nute, Donald 1997: (ed.) Defeasible Deontic Logic (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRef
Nute, Donald and Yu, Xiaochang 1997: “Introduction,” in Nute 1997: 1–16.
Paulson, Stanley L. 1992: “Kelsen’s Legal Theory: The Final Round,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, Gerald 1982: “Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of Law,” Journal of Legal Studies 11(1): 165–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakken, Henry and Sergot, Marek 1996: “Contrary-to-duty Obligations,” Studia Logica 57, 1: 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Arthur N. 1954: “The Paradoxes of Derived Obligation,” Mind 63: 64–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Arthur N. 1955: Formal Logic (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Prior, Arthur N. 1958: “Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics,” in Melden, A. (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosphy (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 135–146).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1950: Methods of Logic (New York: Holt), citations are to the 1982 fourth edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1953: “On What There Is,” in From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the fourteenth printing, 2003 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1970: Philosophy of Logic (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1990: Pursuit of Truth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ratti, Giovanni Battista 2008: Sistema giuridico e sistemazione del diritto (Torino: Giappichelli).Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1971: A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the 1999 revised edition.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1970: The Concept of a Legal System. An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (Oxford: Clarendon Press), citations are to the 1980 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1972: “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law,” The Yale Law Journal, 81(5): 823–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1975: Practical Reason and Norms (London: Hutchinson), citations are to the 1990 second edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1976: “Kelsen’s General Theory of Norms. Critical Study,” Philosophia 6: 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1979: The Authority of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1986: The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1994: Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 2009: Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas 1966: The Logic of Commands (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Jorge 2002: Lógica de los sistemas normativos (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Jorge 2003: “Naturaleza y lógica de las proposiciones normativas. Contribución en homenaje a G. H. von Wright,” Doxa 26: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Jorge 2013: “Norms, Truth, and Legal Statements,” in Beltrán, Jordi Ferrer, Juan, JoséPapayanis, Moreso y Diego (eds.), Neutrality and Theory of Law (The Netherlands, Springer, 127–146).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Jorge and Sucar, Germán 1998: “Las trampas de la derrotabilidad. Niveles de análisis de la indeterminación del derecho,” Analisi e Diritto. Ricerche di Giurisprudenza Analítica: 277–305.
Rönnedal, Daniel 2010: An Introduction to Deontic Logic (Stockholm: CreateSpace).Google Scholar
Ross, Alf 1941, “Imperatives and Logic,” Theoria 7: 53–71.Google Scholar
Ross, Alf 1958: On Law and Justice (London: Stevens & Sons Ltd.).Google Scholar
Ross, Alf 1962: “Review: H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law,” The Yale Law Journal 71: 1185–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alf 1968: Directives and Norms (London: Routledge and Keang Paul).Google Scholar
Ross, Alf 1998: “Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law,” in Paulson, S. L. and Litschewski, B. (eds.), Norms and Normativity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–164).Google Scholar
Ross, David 1930: The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Royyakers, L. M. M. 1998: Extending Deontic Logic for the Formalisation of Legal Rules (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1905: “On Denoting,” Mind XIV (4): 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand and Whitehead, Alfred North 1910: Principia Mathematica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), citations are to the 1999 edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R. M. 1987: Paradoxes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), citations are to the 1995 second edition.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick 1991: Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick 1998: “On the Supposed Defeasibility of Legal Rules,” in Freeman, M. D. A. (ed.), Current Legal Problems 51 (1): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, Rupert 1962: Logik des Rechts (Berlin, Göttingen, Heilderberg: Springer Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Mark 2004: “The Scope of Instrumental Reason,” Philosophical Perspectives 18(1): 337–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J. 1998: “The Difference that Rules Make,” in Bix, B. (ed.), Analyzing Law. New Essays in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–62).Google Scholar
Shiner, Roger 1992: Norm and Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 1985: “A Solution to Forrester’s Paradox of Gentle Murder,” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (3): 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soeteman, Arend 1989: Logic in Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soeteman, Arend 1997: “On Legal Gaps,” in Garzón Valdés, E. et al. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 323–332).Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 2003: Ways a World Might Be. Metaphysical and Antimetaphysical Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenius, Erik 1963: “The Principles of a Logic of Normative Systems,” Acta Philosophica Fennica 16: 247–260.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick 1957: Introduction to Logic (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold), citations are to the 1999 edition (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred 1931: “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” citations are to the 1956 version included in Tarski 1956: 152–278.
Tarski, Alfred 1956: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bass C. 1972: “The Logic of Conditional Obligation,” Journal of Philosphical Logic 1: 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernengo, Roberto 1986: “Sobre algunos criterios de verdad normativa,” Doxa – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho 3: 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1951a: “Deontic Logic,” Mind 60: 1–15.Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1951b: An Essay in Modal Logic (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1956: “A Note on Deontic Logic and Derived Obligation,” Mind 65: 507–9.Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1957: Logical Studies (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1963a: Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1963b: The Logic of Preference: an Essay (Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1964: “A New System of Deontic Logic,” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 1: 173–182.Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1965: “A Correction to a New System of Deontic Logic,” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 2: 103–107.Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1967: “The Logic of Action – A Sketch,” in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 121–136).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1968: An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1969: “On the Logic and Ontology of Norms,” in Davis, J. W. (ed.), Philosophical logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 89–107).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1971: “Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions,” in Hilpinen 1971: 159–177.
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1980: “Problems and Prospects of Deontic Logic,” in Agazzi, E. (ed.), Modern Logic – A Survey (Dordrecht: Reidel, 399–423).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1983: Practical Reason. Philosophical Papers, vol. I (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1984: Truth, Knowledge and Modality (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1985: “Is and Ought,” in Bulygin, E. et al. (eds.), Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life (Dordrecht: Reidel, 31–48).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1989: “Intellectual Autobiography,” in Schilpp, P. et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Illinois: Open Court, 1–55).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1993: The Tree of Knowledge and Other Essays (New York: E. J. Brill).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1996: Six Essays in Philosophical Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 60 (Helsinki: North-Holland Publishers).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1997: “Epilogue, ” in Garzón Valdés, E. et al. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1999: “Deontic Logic – As I See It,” in McNamara and Prakken 1999: 15–25.
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 2000: “On Norms and Norm-Propositions. A Sketch,” in Krawietz, W. et al. (eds.), The Reasonable as Rational? On Legal Argumentation and Justification. Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 173–178).Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid J. 1994: Inclusive Legal Positivism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wedberg, Anders 1951: “Some Problems in the Logical Analysis of Legal Science,” Theoria 17: 246–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 1981: Normentheorie als Grudlage der Jurisprudenz und Ethik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 1984: “On the Meaning of Norm Sentences, Normative Inconsistency, and Normative Entailment,” Rechtstheorie 15: 465–475.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 1985: “The Expressive Conception of Norms – An Impasse for the Logic of Norms,” Law and Philosophy 4(2): 165–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 1986: “Logic and the Pure Theory of Law,” in Tur, R. and Twining, W. (eds.), Essays on Kelsen (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 1991: Law, Institutions and Legal Politics (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 1995: “Normological Inferences and the Generation of Legal Norms,” Ratio Iuris 8(3): 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, Ota 2001: “A Philosophical Approach to Norm Logic,” Ratio Iuris 14(1): 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1921: “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,” first published as “Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung,” in Annalen der Naturphilosophische XIV (3/4), citations are to the 1922 English version (London: Routledge & Kegal Paul).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1953: Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Woleński, Jan 1990: “Deontic Logic and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Historical Sketch,” Studia Logica 49 (2): 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael 1996: The Concept of Moral Obligation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuleta, Hugo 2008: Normas y justificación (Madrid, Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×