Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2014
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Deontic Logic and Legal Systems , pp. 245 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
1969: “Logic of Norm and Logic of Normative Propositions,” Logique et Analyse 12, 47: 242–268.Google Scholar
1982: “Normative Order and Derogation,” in (ed.), Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems, Vol. II (Dordrecht: North Holland Publishing Company, 51–60).Google Scholar
1986: “Conditionality and the Representation of Legal Norms,” in et al. (eds.), Automated Analysis of Legal Texts (North-Holland: Elsevier, 175–186).Google Scholar
1991: “Conflicts of Norms and the Revision of Normative Systems,” Law and Philosophy 10(4): 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993: “Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals,” in Meyer and Wieringa 1993: 43–84.
1995: “Concepciones de la lógica,” in et al. (eds.), Lógica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, 7 (Madrid: Trotta, 11–48).Google Scholar
1996: “Detachment and Defeasibility in Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 57: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1979: Sobre la existencia de las normas jurídicas (Venezuela: Universidad de Carabobo).Google Scholar
and 1981: “The Expressive Conception of Norms,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 95–124.
and 1988: “Perils of Level Confusion in Normative Discourse,” Rechtstheorie 19: 230–237.Google Scholar
and 1989: “Von Wright on Deontic Logic and the Philosophy of Law,” in et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Illinois: Open Court, 665–693).Google Scholar
, , and 1985: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1981: “Hierarchies of Regulations and their Logic,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 125–148.
and 1982: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions,” Theoria 48(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1985: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Safe Contraction,” Studia Logica 44: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1986: “Maps between Some Different Kinds of Contraction Function: The Finite Case,” Studia Logica 45: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2008: Demystifying Legal Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1956: “The Formal Analysis of Normative Systems,” in (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 147–213).Google Scholar
1958: “A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal logic,” Mind 67, 265: 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1967: “Good Samaritans, contrary-to-duty imperatives and epistemic obligations,” Nôus 1: 361–379.Google Scholar
1984: “Deontic Logic,” in and (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume II: Extentions of Classical Logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 605–714), citations are to the 2002 second edition, volume 8 (The Netherlands: Kluwer, 147–264).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987: Introduction to Deontic Logic and the Theory of Normative Systems (Napoli; Bibliopolis).Google Scholar
1991: La normatividad del derecho. Deber jurídico y razones para la acción (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
and 2013: “Two Adaptive Logics of Norm-propositions,” Journal of Applied Logic 11(2): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1997: “Deontic Logics of Defeasibility,” in Nute 1997: 45–58.
1872: Of Laws in General, citations are to the 1970 edition by (London: Athlone Press).Google Scholar
1994: Making it Explicit, Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
1982: “Time and Validity,” in (ed.), Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems (Amsterdam, New York: North Holland Publishing Company, 51–63).Google Scholar
1986: “Legal Dogmatics and the Systematization of Law,” in et al. (eds.), Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, Rechtstheorie 10: 193–210.Google Scholar
1991: “Algunas consideraciones sobre los sistemas jurídicos,” Doxa 9: 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995: “Lógica deóntica,” in et al. (eds.), Lógica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, volumen 7 (Madrid: Trotta, 129–142).Google Scholar
2003: “On Legal Gaps,” Analisi e Diritto: 21–28.
and 2007: “On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?”, Ratio Juris 20, N° 1: 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988: El sistema jurídico. Problemas actuales (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
1996: “Sistema jurídico,” in and (eds.), El derecho y la justicia (Madrid: Trotta, 161–176).Google Scholar
and 2002: “Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties,” in Gabbay, Dov M. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 8, 2nd edition (Netherlands: Kluwer, 265–343).
and 2011: “AGM Theory and Artificial Intelligence,” in et al. (eds.), Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Springer, 1–42).Google Scholar
1981: “The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in one Fell Swoop,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 37–85.
1986: “Obligations, Aspectual Actions and Circumstances,” Philosophical Papers 15: 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999: La teoria del diritto di Hans Kelsen. Una introduzione critica (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
1963: “Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic,” Analysis 34, 2: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965: “The History of the Question of Existential Import for Categorical Propositions,” in (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences. Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 417–424).Google Scholar
and 1993: “Determinacy, Objectivity and Authority,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142(2): 549–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011: “Legal Statements and Normative Language,” Law and Philosophy 30: 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973: Frege. Philosphy of Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the 1981 second edition.Google Scholar
2003: “Raz on Gaps: the Surprising Part,” in et al. (eds.), Rights, Culture, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–118).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989: La norme du vrai (Paris: Gallimard), citations are to the 1991 English edition, The Norm of Truth (New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
and 2011: Jerarquías normativas y dinámica de los sistemas jurídicos (Madrid-Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons).Google Scholar
1937: “Les Logiques Nouvelles des Modalités,” Revue Néoscolastique de Philosophie 40: 517–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1971: “Deontic Logic: An Introduction,” in Hilpinen 1971: 1–35.
1984: “Gentle Murder, or the Adverbial Samaritan,” The Journal of Philosophy 81, Num 4: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1919: “Die Verneinung. Eine Logische Untersuchung,” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I: 143–157, citations are to the 1977 English translation by and , “Negation,” in Logical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
1991: Logic, Language, and Meaning. Volume 1: Introduction to Logic (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
1990: “The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1: 24–46.Google Scholar
1992b: “The Dynamics of Normative Systems,” in (ed.), Expert Systems in Law (North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 293–299).Google Scholar
1934: “Untersuchungen über das Logische Schliessen,” Mathematische Zeitschrift 39: 176–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991: (ed.) Sistemi Normativi Statici e Dinamici. Analisi di una Tipologia Kelseniana (Torino: Giapichelli).
1961: “Kelsen and the Concept of ‘Legal System,’ ” Archiv für Rechts und Sozialphilosophie 47: 355–364.Google Scholar
1999: “Positivism and Conventionalism,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975: “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives,” Journal of Philosophy 72: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969: “An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,” Nous 3: 373–398; reprinted in Hilpinen 1971: 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988: “Deontic Logic without Misleading Alethic Analogies,” Logique et Analyse 31: 337–370.Google Scholar
1992: “A Dyadic Representation of Belief,” in Gärdenfors, 1992a: 89–121.
1999: A Textbook of Belief Dynamics. Theory Change and Database Updating (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001: The Structure of Values and Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004: “A New Representation Theorem for Contranegative Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 77: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006, “Ideal Worlds – Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 82: 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1997: “Applying Normative Rules with Restraint,” in et al. (eds.) Logic and Scientific Method (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 313–332).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1948: “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49, reprinted in (ed.), Logic and Language (First Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 145–166).Google Scholar
1961: The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), citations are to the 1994 2nd edition, Raz, J. and Bullock, P (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
1991: “Introduction. The Final Form of the Pure Theory of Law,” in , General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ix–liii).Google Scholar
1971: (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel).CrossRef
1981b: “On Normative Change,” in et al. (eds.), Ethics: Foundations, Problems and Applications (Wein: Hölder-Pichier-Tempsky, 155–164).
1987: “Conflict and Change in Norm Systems,” in et al. (eds.), The Structure of Law (Uppsala: Iustus Forlag, 37–49).
2001: “Deontic Logic,” in (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic (Oxford: Blackwell, 159–182).
1957: “Quantifiers in Deontic Logic,” Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Literarum XXIII, 4: 1–23.Google Scholar
1971: “Some Main Problems in Deontic Logic,” in Hilpinen 1971: 59–104.
and 1939: “On the Logic of Imperatives,” Philosophy of Science 6, Num. 4: 446–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1881: The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown & Co), citations are to the 2005 edition (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
1957: New Foundations for Ethical Theory (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell), reprinted in Hilpinen 1971: 36–58.Google Scholar
1781: “Preface to the Second Edition” to The Critique of Pure Reason (Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch), citations are to The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, translated and edited in 1998 by and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
1960: Pure Theory of Law, 2nd edition, citations are to the 1989 English version (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith).Google Scholar
1979: Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Wien: Manzsche Verlags und Universitätsbuchhandlung) citations are to the 1991 English edition General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
1959: “A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 24(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1963: “Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Propositional Calculi,” Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1672: Elementa iuris naturalis, citations are to the 1930 edition (Darmstadt: Otto Reichl Verlag).Google Scholar
1974: “Semantical Analysis for Dyadic Deontic Logic,” in (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, Synthese Library, (Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel, 1–14).Google Scholar
1979: “A Problem about Permission,” in et al. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka (Dordrecht: Reidel, 163–175).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992: “Conflicts in Systems of Legal Norms: A Logical Point of View,” in et al. (eds.), Coherence and Conflict in Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 39–64).Google Scholar
1993: Legislative Intent and Other Essays on Law, Politics, and Morality (Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
1978: Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press), citations are to the 1994 new edition with revised foreword (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
1995: “Defeasibility in Law and Logic,” in et al. (eds.), Informatics and the Foundation of Legal Reasoning (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 99–117).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996: “In Memoriam Carlos Eduardo Alchourrón,” Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1(1): 3–10.Google Scholar
1999: “On a Fundamental Problem of Deontic Logic,” in McNamara and Prakken 1999: 29–54.
2005: Bridges from Classical to Non-monotonic Logic (London: King’s College Publications).Google Scholar
and 2001: “Constraints for Input-output Logics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2): 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2003: “Permission from an Input-output Perspective,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 32: 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009: Social Conventions: From Language to Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006: “Deontic Logic,” in et al. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7 (The Neatherlands: Elsevier).Google Scholar
and 1999: (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems (Amsterdan; Berlin; Oxford; Tokyo; Washington, DC: IOS Press).
and 1993: (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification (Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley & Sons).
1960: “Logical Necessity, Physical Necessity, Ethics, and Quantifiers,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosphy, vol. 3: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998: Legal Indeterminacy and Constitutional Interpretation (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1993: Orden jurídico y sistema jurídico. Una investigación sobre la identidad y la dinámica de los sistemas jurídicos (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
and 1997: “Applicability and Effectiveness of Legal Norms,” Law and Philosophy 16(2): 201–219.Google Scholar
and 1998: “The Reception of Norms and Open Legal Systems,” in and (eds.), Normativity and Norms. Critical perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–291).Google Scholar
, , , and 2004: “Applicability of Legal Norms,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XVII (2): 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997: (ed.) Defeasible Deontic Logic (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRef
and 1997: “Introduction,” in Nute 1997: 1–16.
1992: “Kelsen’s Legal Theory: The Final Round,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982: “Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of Law,” Journal of Legal Studies 11(1): 165–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1958: “Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics,” in (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosphy (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 135–146).Google Scholar
1950: Methods of Logic (New York: Holt), citations are to the 1982 fourth edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
1953: “On What There Is,” in From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the fourteenth printing, 2003 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
1971: A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the 1999 revised edition.Google Scholar
1970: The Concept of a Legal System. An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (Oxford: Clarendon Press), citations are to the 1980 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
1972: “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law,” The Yale Law Journal, 81(5): 823–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975: Practical Reason and Norms (London: Hutchinson), citations are to the 1990 second edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
1976: “Kelsen’s General Theory of Norms. Critical Study,” Philosophia 6: 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002: Lógica de los sistemas normativos (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar
2003: “Naturaleza y lógica de las proposiciones normativas. Contribución en homenaje a G. H. von Wright,” Doxa 26: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2013: “Norms, Truth, and Legal Statements,” in , (eds.), Neutrality and Theory of Law (The Netherlands, Springer, 127–146).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998: “Las trampas de la derrotabilidad. Niveles de análisis de la indeterminación del derecho,” Analisi e Diritto. Ricerche di Giurisprudenza Analítica: 277–305.
1962: “Review: H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law,” The Yale Law Journal 71: 1185–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998: “Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law,” in and (eds.), Norms and Normativity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–164).Google Scholar
1998: Extending Deontic Logic for the Formalisation of Legal Rules (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1910: Principia Mathematica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), citations are to the 1999 edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
1987: Paradoxes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), citations are to the 1995 second edition.Google Scholar
1991: Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
1998: “On the Supposed Defeasibility of Legal Rules,” in (ed.), Current Legal Problems 51 (1): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004: “The Scope of Instrumental Reason,” Philosophical Perspectives 18(1): 337–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998: “The Difference that Rules Make,” in (ed.), Analyzing Law. New Essays in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–62).Google Scholar
1985: “A Solution to Forrester’s Paradox of Gentle Murder,” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (3): 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997: “On Legal Gaps,” in et al. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 323–332).Google Scholar
2003: Ways a World Might Be. Metaphysical and Antimetaphysical Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1963: “The Principles of a Logic of Normative Systems,” Acta Philosophica Fennica 16: 247–260.Google Scholar
1957: Introduction to Logic (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold), citations are to the 1999 edition (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
1931: “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” citations are to the 1956 version included in Tarski 1956: 152–278.
1972: “The Logic of Conditional Obligation,” Journal of Philosphical Logic 1: 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986: “Sobre algunos criterios de verdad normativa,” Doxa – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho 3: 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1965: “A Correction to a New System of Deontic Logic,” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 2: 103–107.Google Scholar
, 1967: “The Logic of Action – A Sketch,” in (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 121–136).Google Scholar
, 1968: An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company).Google Scholar
, 1969: “On the Logic and Ontology of Norms,” in (ed.), Philosophical logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 89–107).Google Scholar
, 1971: “Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions,” in Hilpinen 1971: 159–177.
, 1980: “Problems and Prospects of Deontic Logic,” in (ed.), Modern Logic – A Survey (Dordrecht: Reidel, 399–423).Google Scholar
, 1985: “Is and Ought,” in et al. (eds.), Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life (Dordrecht: Reidel, 31–48).Google Scholar
, 1989: “Intellectual Autobiography,” in et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Illinois: Open Court, 1–55).Google Scholar
, 1996: Six Essays in Philosophical Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 60 (Helsinki: North-Holland Publishers).Google Scholar
, 1997: “Epilogue, ” in et al. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
, 1999: “Deontic Logic – As I See It,” in McNamara and Prakken 1999: 15–25.
, 2000: “On Norms and Norm-Propositions. A Sketch,” in et al. (eds.), The Reasonable as Rational? On Legal Argumentation and Justification. Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 173–178).Google Scholar
1951: “Some Problems in the Logical Analysis of Legal Science,” Theoria 17: 246–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981: Normentheorie als Grudlage der Jurisprudenz und Ethik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
1984: “On the Meaning of Norm Sentences, Normative Inconsistency, and Normative Entailment,” Rechtstheorie 15: 465–475.Google Scholar
1985: “The Expressive Conception of Norms – An Impasse for the Logic of Norms,” Law and Philosophy 4(2): 165–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986: “Logic and the Pure Theory of Law,” in and (eds.), Essays on Kelsen (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
1995: “Normological Inferences and the Generation of Legal Norms,” Ratio Iuris 8(3): 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1921: “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,” first published as “Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung,” in Annalen der Naturphilosophische XIV (3/4), citations are to the 1922 English version (London: Routledge & Kegal Paul).Google Scholar
1990: “Deontic Logic and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Historical Sketch,” Studia Logica 49 (2): 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996: The Concept of Moral Obligation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar