Selected Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Demystifying Legal Reasoning , pp. 237 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
. All or Nothing at All? The Intentions of Authorities and the Authority of Intentions, in Law and Interpretation: Essays in Philosophy 357–404 (, ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995).Google Scholar
, and . “Is That English You're Speaking?” Why Intention Free Interpretation Is an Impossibility, 41 San Diego L. Rev. 967 (2004).Google Scholar
, and Mother, May I? Imposing Mandatory Prospective Rules of Statutory Interpretation, 20 Const. Comment. 97 (2003).Google Scholar
, and . Law's Limited Domain Confronts Morality's Universal Empire, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1579 (2007).Google Scholar
, and Interpreting Rules: The Nature and Limits of Inchoate Intentions, in Legal Interpretation in Democratic State 3–28 ( and , eds., Aldershot: Ashgate 2002).Google Scholar
, and Judges as Rulemakers, in Common Law Theory 27–50 (, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
, and The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (Durham: Duke University Press 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases (8th ed., and , eds., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1987).
. Social Choice and Individual Values (2d ed., New Haven: Yale University Press 1963).Google Scholar
“No Motor Vehicles in the Park”: Reviving the Hart-Fuller Debate to Introduce Statutory Construction, 48 J. Legal Educ. 88 (1998).Google Scholar
. Remarks on a Legal Positivist Misuse of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy, 22 Law & Phil. 513 (2003).Google Scholar
. Putting Meaning in Its Place: Originalism and Philosophy of Language, 25 Law and Phil. 387 (2006).Google Scholar
. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1987).Google Scholar
Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 925 (1996).Google Scholar
Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review, 17 Phil. and Pub. Affs. 105 (1988).Google Scholar
. On Misinterpreting Kripke's Wittgenstein, 56 Phil. and Phenomenological Res. 339 (1996).Google Scholar
. A Common Law for the Age of Statutes (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1995).Google Scholar
That Obscure Object of Desire: Hermeneutics and the Autonomous Legal Text, 77 Minn. L. Rev. 1065 (1993).Google Scholar
. Interpretation and Intention: The Debate between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism, 31 Metaphilosophy 75 (2000).Google Scholar
Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom (New York: Knopf 1993).Google Scholar
. A Common Lawyer Looks at Constitutional Interpretation, 72 Boston L. Rev. 699 (1992).Google Scholar
., and . Statutory Interpretation as Practical Reasoning, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 321 (1990).Google Scholar
. The Inevitability of Practical Reasoning: Statutes, Formalism, and the Rule of Law, 45 Vand. L. Rev. 533 (1992).Google Scholar
Play of Surfaces: Theory and the Law, in Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory, and Practice 297–316 (, ed., Berkeley: University of California Press 1992).Google Scholar
Wrong Again, in Doing What Comes Naturally 103–19 (Durham: Duke University Press 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Congressional Intent, Practical Reasoning, and the Dynamic Nature of Federal Indian Law, 78 Cal. L. Rev. 1137 (1990).Google Scholar
. The Artificial Reasoning of the Law, or What Lawyers Know, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 35 (1981).Google Scholar
Marmor on Meaning, Interpretation, and Legislative Intention, 1 Legal Theory 439 (1995).Google Scholar
. Dworkin's Fallacy, or What the Philosophy of Language Can't Teach Us about the Law, 89 Va. L. Rev. 1897 (2003).Google Scholar
Legislation: Statutory Interpretation: 20 Questions (New York: Foundation Press 1999).Google Scholar
, and . The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law ( and , eds., New York: Foundation Press 1994).Google Scholar
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (, , and , eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002).CrossRef
, Counterfactuals in Interpretation, in Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader 55–68 ( and , eds., Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study ( and , eds., Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing 1997).
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (, , and , eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982).CrossRef
. American Constitutionalism, in Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations 16–63 (, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998).Google Scholar
Original Intentions, Standard Meanings, and the Legal Character of the Constitution, 6 Const. Comment. 39 (1989).Google Scholar
, and Against Theory 2: Hermeneutics and Deconstruction, 14 Critical Inquiry 49 (1987).Google Scholar
, and Intention, Identity, and the Constitution: A Response to David Hoy, in Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory, and Practice 187–99 (, ed., Berkeley: University of California Press 1992).Google Scholar
. How to Talk to Yourself, or Kripke's Wittgenstein's Solitary Language Argument and Why It Fails, 84 Pac. Phil. Q. 215 (2003).Google Scholar
. Legal Reasoning and Coherence Theories: Dworkin's Rights Thesis, Retroactivity, and the Linear Order of Decisions, 72 Cal. L. Rev. 369 (1984).Google Scholar
. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
. Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability, 2 Phil. of Science Assoc. 669 (1982).Google Scholar
. Statutory Interpretation and the Counterfactual Test for Legislative Intention, 8 Law and Phil. 383 (1989).Google Scholar
. The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study (Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publishing 1960).Google Scholar
The Separation Thesis and the Limits of Interpretation, 12 Canadian J.L. and Jurisprudence 135 (1995).Google Scholar
. The Importance of Humility in Judicial Review: A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's “Moral Reading” of the Constitution, 65 Fordham L. Rev. 1269 (1997).Google Scholar
. Figuring the Law: Holism and Tropological Inference in Legal Interpretation, 97 Yale L.J. 823 (1988).Google Scholar
. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Abrogating Stare Decisis by Statute: May Congress Remove the Precedential Effect of Roe and Casey?, 109 Yale L.J. 1535 (2000).Google Scholar
. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1993).Google Scholar
. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1971).Google Scholar
. Picking Positivism Apart: Stanley Fish on Epistemology and Law, 8 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 401 (1999).Google Scholar
. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government (New Haven: Yale University Press 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1997).Google Scholar
. Amending the Presuppositions of a Constitution, in Responding to Imperfection (, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press 1995).Google Scholar
Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Life and Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1991).Google Scholar
Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995).Google Scholar
. Finding Wittgenstein at the Core of the Rule of Recognition, 52 S.M.U. L. Rev. 75 (1999).Google Scholar
. Congress Is a “They,” Not an “It”: Legislative Intent as an Oxymoron, 12 Intl. Rev. Law Econ. 239 (1992).Google Scholar
The Ratio Decidendi of a Case and the Doctrine of Binding Precedent, in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 148–75 (, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 1961).Google Scholar
. Two Systems of Reasoning, in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 379–96 (, , and , eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002).Google Scholar
. Commas, Constitutional Grammar, and the Straight-Face Test: What If Conan the Grammarian Were a Strict Textualist?, 16 Const. Comment. 7 (1999).Google Scholar
. On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma, 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 462 (1987).Google Scholar
. Vagueness, Counterfactual Intentions, and Legal Interpretation, 7 Legal Theory 447 (2001).Google Scholar
. Wittgenstein's Rule-Following Paradox and the Objectivity of Meaning, 26 Phil. Investig. 285 (2003).Google Scholar
. Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas 1999).Google Scholar
Dworkin's “Originalism”: The Role of Intentions in Constitutional Interpretation, 62 Rev. of Pol. 197 (2000).Google Scholar
. Shareability and Actual Sharing: Korsgaard's Position on the Publicity of Reasons, 25 Phil. Invest. 172 (2002).Google Scholar
, and . Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of Law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein, 84 Geo. L.J. 485 (1996).Google Scholar