Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Studying democratic innovations: an analytical framework
- 2 Popular assemblies: from New England town meetings to participatory budgeting
- 3 Mini-publics: assemblies by random selection
- 4 Direct legislation: direct democracy through the ballot box
- 5 E-democracy: the promise of information and communication technology
- 6 Realising the goods of democratic institutions
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Studying democratic innovations: an analytical framework
- 2 Popular assemblies: from New England town meetings to participatory budgeting
- 3 Mini-publics: assemblies by random selection
- 4 Direct legislation: direct democracy through the ballot box
- 5 E-democracy: the promise of information and communication technology
- 6 Realising the goods of democratic institutions
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democratic InnovationsDesigning Institutions for Citizen Participation, pp. 202 - 216Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
1998. ‘Learning Democratic Practice: Distributing Government Resources through Popular Participation in Porto Alegre, Brazil’, in and (eds.) Cities for Citizens. Chichester and New York: Wiley, 39–65.Google Scholar
2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Reflections on What Makes Empowered Participatory Governance Happen’, in and (eds.) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso, 200–7.Google Scholar
2002. ‘A Debate about the Issue of Possible Commercialisation of GM Crops in the UK (Letter to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)’, 26 April.
and 2004. Participatory Budgets in Europe: Between Efficiency and Growing Local Democracy. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute and the Centre for Democratic Policy-Making.Google Scholar
2004. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘The Language of Democracy: Vernacular or Esparanto? A Comparison between the Multiculturalist and Cosmopolitan Perspectives’, Political Studies 53: 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003a. ‘Participation, Activism and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment’, in and (eds.) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso, 45–76.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2003b. Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books.
2005. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy’, Political Quarterly 113: 573–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. ‘Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections’, Amercian Journal of Political Science 194: 194–230.Google Scholar
1992. ‘Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratisation’, Political Studies Special Issue (Prospects for Democracy) 40: 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1996. Democracy and Difference. Princeton University Press.
2004. From Input to Influence: Participatory Approaches to Research and Inquiry into Poverty. Birmingham: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
, and 2008. ‘Do Citizen Assemblies Make Reasoned Choices?’, in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 127–44.Google Scholar
1998. ‘The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6: 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Urbanisation without Cities: The Rise and Decline of Citizenship. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
and 1988. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
and 2001. ‘Popular Control of Referendum Agendas: Implications for Democratic Outcomes and Minority Rights’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 125–46.Google Scholar
and 2002. ‘Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. ‘A Proposal to Transform the House of Lords into a Citizens’ Assembly, www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Published%20writing/Democratizing-House-of-Lords.pdf.
2006. ‘Survey Article: Citizens Panels and the Concept of Representation’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14: 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999. ‘Direct Democracy and Civic Competence: The Case of Town Meeting’, in and (eds.) Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. Pennsylvania State University Press, 195–224.Google Scholar
2001. ‘Political Parties in Direct Democracy’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke, Palgrave, 67–87.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1994a. Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington: AEI Press.CrossRef
and (eds.) 1994b. ‘Theory’, in and (eds.) Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington: AEI Press, 11–23.CrossRef
2004. ‘Participatory Budgeting: A Significant Contribution to Participatory Democracy’, Environment and Urbanization 16: 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘Government Memorandum in Response to the Public Administration Select Committee's Sixth Report on Public Participation: Issues and Innovations’, in House of Commons Select Committee on Public Administration, Public Participation: Issues and Innovations: The Government's Response to the Committee's Sixth Report of Session 2000–01. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
, and 2003. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. ‘Compensatory Justice and Social Institutions’, Economics and Philosophy 1: 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. ‘Adapting and Combing Deliberative Designs’, in and (eds.) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 120–38.
, and 2008. ‘When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform', in (ed.) To Keep or to Change First Past the Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform. Oxford University Press, 140–62.Google Scholar
and 2005. ‘Transnational Communication and the European Demos’, in and (eds.) Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm. Princeton University Press, 283–311.Google Scholar
2001. ‘Constitutional Referendums and Democratic Deliberation’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 231–55.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 289–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. ‘Quantity Versus Quality: Dilemmas of Mass Democracy’, University of British Columbia, Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions Working Paper: Citizen Engagement No. 3, http://democracy.ubc.ca/fileadmin/template/main/images/departments/CSDI/working_papers/ChambersCSDIWorkingPaper2007CE3.pdf
2004. Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia (Technical Report). Vancover: Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform.Google Scholar
1989. ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in and (eds.) The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford University Press, 17–34.Google Scholar
1996. ‘Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy’, in (ed.) Democracy and Difference. Princeton University Press, 95–119.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet: Two Case Studies of Online Consultations’, Information, Communication and Society 7: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books.
, and 2003. User Involvement in Change Management: A Review of the Literature. Report to NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development. London: NHS Institute for Health Research.
1999. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Trustworthy democratic facilitation (manuscript). Minneapolis: Jefferson Center.Google Scholar
2007. ‘Peter C. Dienel: Eulogy for a Deliberative Democracy Pioneer’, Journal of Public Deliberation 3, http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art7.Google Scholar
and 2005. ‘Citizens’ Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People', in and (eds.) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 111–19.Google Scholar
, , , André Blais and 2008. ‘Deliberation, Information and Trust: The BC Citizens’ Assembly as Agenda-Setter', in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 166–91.Google Scholar
2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2001. ‘Public Opinion and Direct Democracy’, Journal of Democracy 12: 141–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2006. Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions. Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (eds.) 1998. Ordinary Wisdom: Reflections on an Experiment in Citizenship and Health Care. London: King's Fund.
2006. ‘Voting Systems’, www.deborda.org/votingsys.shtml.
1996. ‘Das “Burgergutachten” und seine Nebenwirkungen’, trans. Corrine Wales as ‘The “Citizens’ Report” and Its Wider Effects', Forum für Interdisziplinare Forschung 17: 113–35.Google Scholar
and 1995. ‘Planning Cells: A Gate to “Fractal” Mediation’, in , and (eds.) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordecht: Kluwer, 117–40.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘The First Ammendment Online: Santa Monica's Public Electronic Network’, in ,
and (eds.) Cyberdemocracy: Technologies, Cities and Civic Networks. London: Routledge, 125–51.
and 2000. ‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making’, Governance 13: 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Have You Been PA'd? Using Participatory Appraisal to Shape Local Services. Glasgow: Oxfam GB.Google Scholar
1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
2001. ‘The Medium Is the Message: How Referendums Lead Us to Understand Equality’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 147–65.Google Scholar
Secretariat 2007. Process Report. Amsterdam: Electoral System Civic Forum Secretariat.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Deliberation and Constitution Making’, in (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Flash Eurobarometer 135: Internet and the Public at Large. Brussels: EOS Gallop Europe.Google Scholar
2006a. Digital Dialogues: Interim Report, December 2005–August 2006. London: Hansard Society / Department for Constitutional Affairs.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2006b. TellParliament.net Interim Evaluation Report 2003–5. London: Hansard Society.
1990. ‘Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms’, Science, Technology and Human Values 15: 226–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘Online “Deliberative Poll” Gives Picture of Informed Public Opinion in Election’. Research Paper, Centre for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford University, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html.
and 2005. ‘Deliberative Polling’, in and (eds.) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 68–79.Google Scholar
and 2000. ‘The Quest for Deliberative Democracy’, in (ed.) Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association. London: Routledge, 17–28.Google Scholar
, , and 2006. ‘Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China’, Research Paper, Centre for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford University, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html.
1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006. ‘Learning in Public Policy’, in , and (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Direct Democracy: Politico-Economic Lessons from Swiss Experience’, The American Economic Review 84: 338–42.Google Scholar
and 2006. ‘Strengthening the Citizens’ Role in International Organizations', Review of International Organizations 1: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003a. ‘Deliberative Democracy, Chicago Style: Grass-Roots Governance in Policing and Public Education’, in and (eds.) Deepening Democracy. London: Verso, 111–43.Google Scholar
2003b. ‘Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences’, Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 338–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Varieties of Participation in Democratic Governance’, Paper prepared for the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, April 7–10.
2007. ‘Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructing Engagement’, Amercian Journal of Political Science 101: 443–58.Google Scholar
1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and 2001. ‘Legislative Responses to Direct Legislation’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 88–128.Google Scholar
and 2002. ‘Australia Decides? The Role of the Media in Deliberative Polling’, in and (eds.) Constitutional Politics. St. Lucia: Queensland Press, 163–76.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) 2004. Electronic Democracy: Mobilisation, Organisation and Participation via New ICTs. London: Routledge.CrossRef
2003. ‘Making Participation Work in Porto Alegre’, in (ed.) Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books, 27–52.Google Scholar
and Aaron Schneider 2003. ‘Restraining the Revolution or Deepening Democracy? The Workers’ Party in Rio Grande do Sul', in (ed.) Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books, 155–75.Google Scholar
2007. ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 40–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. ‘Deliberative Impact: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics’, Politics and Society 34: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. The Porto Alegre Experiment: Learning Lessons for Better Democracy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
and 2003. ‘Faith in What Will Change: The PT Administration in Belém’, in (ed.) Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books, 53–78.Google Scholar
1996a. ‘Democracy, Philosophy, and Justification’, in (ed.) Democracy and Difference. Princeton University Press, 340–7.Google Scholar
1996b. ‘Responding to Racial Injustice’, in K. A. Appiah and (eds.) Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race. Princeton University Press, 106–78.Google Scholar
and 1997. Citizens' Juries in Local Government: Report from the LGMB on Pilot Projects. Luton: LGMB.Google Scholar
1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, Ideology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2003. Assessment of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
, and 2005. ‘Uninterested Youth? Young People's Attitudes towards Party Politics in Britain’, Political Studies 53: 556–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to the Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Australia and New Zealand’, in and (eds.) Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 154–73.Google Scholar
2004. Lonely Citizens: Report of the Working Party on Active Citizenship. London: IPPR.Google Scholar
, and 2005. ‘Deliberative Preferences in the Presidential Nomination Campaign: Evidence from an Online Deliberative Poll’, paper available from The Center for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford University, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html.
, and 1998. The Political Paradox of Rationing: The Case of the Oregon Health Plan. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
2008. ‘Descriptive Representation in Citizen Assemblies’, in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 106–26.Google Scholar
and 2004. ‘Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy: Hypotheses, Variables and Methodologies’, paper prepared for the Conference on ‘Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics’, European University Institute, Florence, 22–23 May.
and 2001. ‘The News Media and Referendums’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 211–30.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Minnesota E-Democracy Survey Report’, www.e-democracy.org/research/edemsurvey2002-jakobjensen.pdf.
and 1998. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Danish Consensus Conferences as a Model of Participatory Technology Assessment: An Impact Study of Consensus Conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish Public Debate’, Science and Public Policy 25: 2–22.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
and Jr. (eds.) 2002. Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
, and 2004. ‘Conclusions: Adopting Electronic Voting – Context Matters’, in and (eds.) Electronic Voting and Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 276–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. ‘Consensus Conferences at the Danish Board of Technology’, in and (eds.) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum, 41–52.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Switzerland’, in and (eds.) Referendums around the World. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 98–153.Google Scholar
2002. ‘Individual Opinion Formation in a Direct Democratic Campaign’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. ‘Deliberating Waste: The Hertfordshire Citizens’ Jury', Local Environment 2: 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. ‘Citizenship in an Era of Globalisation’, in and (eds.) Democracy's Edges. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007. ‘But Is It for Real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a Model of State-Sponsored Citizen Empowerment', Politics and Society 35: 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. ‘The Agenda Problem in Participatory Governance: Evidence from the BC Citizens’ Assembly', in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 85–105.Google Scholar
and 2005a. ‘Digital Formations: Constructing an Object of Study’, in and (eds.) Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm. Princeton University Press, 1–36.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 2005b. Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm. Princeton University Press.
1997. ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma’, American Political Science Review 91: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2001. ‘Trends in Public Participation: Part 2 – Citizens’ Perspectives', Public Administration 79: 445–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. ‘Taking Democracy to Scale: Creating a Town Hall Meeting for the Twenty-First Century’, National Civic Review 91: 351–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2005. ‘A Town Meeting for the Twenty-First Century’, in and (eds.) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 154–63.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections’, Amercian Political Science Review 88: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2001. ‘Are Voters to Blame? Voter Competence and Elite Maneuvers in Referendums’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 191–210.Google Scholar
and 2004. ‘Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions’, Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2006. ‘Considered Opinions on U.S. Foreign Policy: Face-to-Face versus Online Deliberative Polling’, paper available from The Center for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford University, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html.
, and 2002. ‘Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 455–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Direct Legislation in the American States’, in and (eds.) Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 218–57.Google Scholar
1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. ‘Using Power/Fighting Power’, in (ed.) Democracy and Difference. Princeton University Press, 46–66.Google Scholar
1999. ‘Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System’, in (ed.) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 211–39.Google Scholar
1997. An Evaluation of the King's Fund Citizens' Juries Programme. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre.Google Scholar
and 2001. ‘Introduction: Referendum Democracy’, in and (eds.) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. ‘The National Issues Convention Deliberative Poll’, Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 588–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. ‘Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice’, Political Studies (Special Issue: Prospects for Democracy) 40: 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Womenspeak: E-Democracy or He Democracy?London: Fawcett Society (Occasional Paper).Google Scholar
2005. ‘The Virtual Agora Project: A Research Design for Studying Democratic Deliberation’, Journal of Public Deliberation 1: Article 5, http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol1/iss1/art5.
1992. ‘Combining Deliberation and Fair Representation in Community Health Decisions’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140: 1965–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and 2004. ‘Public Participation and Collaborative Governance’, Journal of Social Policy 33: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘Will New Technology Boost Turnout?’, in and (eds.) Electronic Voting and Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 193–225.Google Scholar
, , , and 2001. A Rough Guide to PPAs. Participatory Poverty Assessment: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
2003. ‘An Enduring Legacy? Popular Participation in the Aftermath of the Participatory Budgets of João Monlevade and Betim’, in (ed.) Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books, 91–112.Google Scholar
and 1991. ‘Democratic Institutions and Moral Resources’, in (ed.) Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 143–71.Google Scholar
2007. One Ballot, Two Votes: A New Way to Vote in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform.Google Scholar
2007. Democracy at Work: The Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform. Toronto: Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform.Google Scholar
1990. Health Care in Common: Report on the Oregon Health Decisions Community Meeting Process. Tualatin, OR: Oregon Health Decisions.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1999. UK National Consensus Conference on Radioactive Waste: Final ReportCambridge: UKCEED.
2001. ‘Deliberative Democracy and Referendums’, in , and (eds.) Challenges to Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 131–52.Google Scholar
2006. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. ‘Introduction’, in (ed.) Participation in Politics. Manchester University Press, 3–38.Google Scholar
, and 2005. Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1999. Disaffected Democracies. Princeton University Press.
and 2007. ‘Major Findings and Paths for Research: A Concluding Note’, European Journal of Political Research 46: 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Elections. University of Chicago Press.
2002. The Implementation of Electronic Voting in the UK. London: Local Government Association.Google Scholar
2006. Understanding E-democracy Developments in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
2007. ‘Local Democracy in Europe: Democratic X-Ray as the Basis for Comparative Analysis’, mimeo.Google Scholar
2000. ‘Choices Without Reasons: Citizens’ Juries and Policy Evaluation', Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 272–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1998. ‘Deliberative Polls: Toward Improved Measures of “Informed” Public Opinion’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10: 145–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
2008. ‘Communicative Rationality in the Citizens’ Assembly and Referendum Processes', in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 145–65.Google Scholar
(2007). ‘ ”Sham” Citizens’ Juries Face Controls', The Observer, 30 September.
and 2006. ‘Analyzing Greens in Power: Setting the Agenda’, European Journal of Political Research 45: S1–S33.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Discourse Architecture and Very Large-Scale Conversation’, in and (eds.) Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm. Princeton University Press, 242–82.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘Facilitating a Citizens’ Jury: Working with “Perfect Strangers”', in , , , and (eds.) Ordinary Wisdom; Reflections on an Experiment in Citizenship and Health Care. London: King's Fund, 35–64.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy’, Politics and Society 26: 461–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. ‘Direct and Deliberative Democracy’, paper presented at the Copenhagen ECPR Joint Sessions. Copenhagen, 14–19 April.
2001. ‘Making Democratic Connections: Political Equality, Deliberation and Direct Democracy’, Acta Politica 36: 361–79.Google Scholar
1993. ‘Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists’, PS: Political Science and Politics 26: 486–90.Google Scholar
, and 2006. ‘Virtual Environmental Citizenship: Web-Based Public Participation in Rulemaking in the United States’, in and (eds.) Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 209–36.Google Scholar
and 2000. ‘Budgets and Ballots in Brazil: Participatory Budgeting from the City to the State’, IDS Working Paper 149. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
2003. ‘Participation by Design: The Experiences of Alvorada and Gravataí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil’, in (ed.) Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books, 113–30.Google Scholar
and 2001. Civic Innovation in America: Community Empowerment, Public Policy, and the Movement for Civic Renewal. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2005. Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from around the World. London: Power Inquiry. www.soton.ac.uk/ccd/events/SuppMat/Beyond%20the%20Ballot.pdf.Google Scholar
and 2005. ‘The Theory and Practice of Group Representation: Reflections on the Governance of Race Equality in Birmingham’, Public Administration 83: 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. ‘The Theory and Practice of Citizens’ Juries', Policy and Politics 27: 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. ‘Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy', Political Studies 48: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. ‘Voter Ignorance and the Democratic Ideal’, Critical Review, 12: 413–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Deliberation and Decision-Making: Discontinuity in the Two-Track Model’, in 'Entreves (ed.) Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. Manchester University Press, 133–56.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions’, International Social Science Journal 155: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2005. ‘A Different Take on the Deliberative Poll: Information, Deliberation and Attitude Constraint’, Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 30–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. ‘Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes’, Yale Law Journal 110: 71–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. ‘Who Governs in Participatory Budgeting Institutions? A Comparative Study of the Decision-Making Processes in Three European Cases of Participatory Budgeting’, paper prepared for the CINEFOGO Conference ‘Citizen Participation in Decision-Making’, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, 14–15 February.
1994. ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in (ed.) Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press, 25–74.Google Scholar
2008. ‘Who Should Govern Who Governs? The Role of Citizens in Reforming the Electoral System’, in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 20–49.Google Scholar
and 2001. ‘The Emotional Dynamics of Deliberative Democracy’, Policy and Politics 29: 351–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. ‘EU Citizens Accept Need for Pension Reform, Resist Enlargement: First EU-Wide Deliberative Poll Reveals Citizens’ Considered Preferences', press release. Paris: Notre Europe. http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/eu/2007/eu-dpoll-pressrelease.pdf.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Can We Trust the Polls? It All Depends’, The Brookings Review 21: 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2003. Evaluation of the Use of New Technologies in Order to Facilitate Democracy in Europe: E-democratising the Parliaments and Parties of Europe. Florence: European University.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Electronic Democracy and the Public Sphere: Opportunities and Challenges’, in , and (eds.) Cyberdemocracy: Technologies, Cities and Civic Networks. London: Routledge, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) 1998. Cyberdemocracy: Technologies, Cities and Civic Networks. London: Routledge.CrossRef
2002. ‘Rewriting the Referendum Rules’, in and (eds.) Constitutional Politics. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 177–200.Google Scholar
and 2003. Case Study 2 – Porto Alegre, Brazil: Participatory Approaches in Budgeting and Public Expenditure Management (Note No. 71). Washington, DC: Social Development Publications, World Bank.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 2002. Constitutional Politics. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
1996. ‘What Should We Expect from More Democracy? Radically Democratic Responses to Politics’, Political Theory 24: 241–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. ‘Citizen Representatives’, in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 2008a. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
and (eds.) 2008b. ‘Introduction’, in and (eds.) Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge University Press, 1–19.CrossRef
and 2006. ‘The European Union in Cyberspace: Multilingual Democratic Participation in a Virtual Public Sphere’, Journal of Language and Politics 5: 251–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. ‘Government-Run Online Discussion Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8: 550–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Design: The Case of Online Discussion Forums’, New Media and Society 9: 849–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar