References

Kurt Weyland

Aboy Carlés, Gerardo. 2009. Nacionalismo e indigenismo en el gobierno de Evo Morales. In Aibar, Julio and Vázquez, Daniel, eds. “Autoritarismo o democracia” Hugo Chávez y Evo Morales, 259–86. Tlalpan, Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar

Abrahám, Samuel. 2000. The Rise and Fall of Illiberal Democracy in Slovakia: 1989–1998. Ph.D. dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan. 2021. The Politics of Good versus Evil. In Sabato, Larry, Kondik, Kyle, and Coleman, Miles, eds. A Return to Normalcy? The 2020 Elections That (Almost) Broke America, 63–80. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan. 2018. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan. 2013. The Electoral Roots of America’s Dysfunctional Government. Presidential Studies Quarterly 43:4 (December): 709–31.Google Scholar

Abueva, Jose. 2002. A Crisis of Political Leadership. In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 78–97. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher, and Bartels, Larry. 2016. Democracy for Realists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Acosta, Alberto. 2005. Ecuador: Ecos de la rebelión de los forajidos. Nueva Sociedad 198 (July): 42–54.Google Scholar

Ádám, Zoltán. 2019. Explaining Orbán: A Political Transaction Cost Theory of Populism. Problems of Post-Communism 66:6 (November/December): 385–401.Google Scholar

Adeney, Katharine. 2021. How Can We Model Ethnic Democracy? An Application to Contemporary India. Nations and Nationalism 27:2 (April): 393–411.Google Scholar

Aguilar Rivera, José. 2022. Dinámicas de la Autocratización: México 2021. Revista de Ciencia Política 42:2 (August): 355–82.Google Scholar

Aiyar, Swaminathan. 2020. Despite Modi, India Has Not Yet Become a Hindu Authoritarian State. Washington, DC: CATO Institute. Policy Analysis # 903 (24 November).Google Scholar

Akkerman, Tjitske. 2017. Populist Parties in Power and Their Impact on Liberal Democracies in Western Europe. In Heinisch, Reinhard, Holtz-Bacha, Christina, and Mazzoleni, Oscar, eds. Political Populism: A Handbook, 169–80. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Akkerman, Tjitske, de Lange, Sarah, and Rooduijn, Matthijs, eds. 2016. Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Albertazzi, Daniele, and McDonnell, Duncan. 2005. The Lega Nord in the Second Berlusconi Government. West European Politics 28:5 (November): 952–72.Google Scholar

Albertazzi, Daniele, and Newell, James. 2015. Introduction: A Mountain Giving Birth to a Mouse? On the Impact and Legacy of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy. Modern Italy 20:1 (February): 3–10.Google Scholar

Aldaz Peña, Raúl. 2021. Oiling Congress: Windfall Revenues, Institutions, and Policy Change in the Long Run. Journal of Politics in Latin America 13:2 (August): 141–65.Google Scholar

Alsogaray, Álvaro. 1993. Experiencias de cincuenta años de política y economía argentina. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar

Alston, Lee, Melo, Marcus, Mueller, Bernardo, and Pereira, Carlos. 2008. On the Road to Good Governance: Recovering from Economic and Political Shocks in Brazil. In Stein, Eduardo and Tommasi, Mariano, eds. Policymaking in Latin America, 111–53. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Althoff, Andrea. 2019. Right-Wing Populism and Evangelicalism in Guatemala: The Presidency of Jimmy Morales. International Journal of Latin American Religions 3:2 (December): 294–324.Google Scholar

Alvarado, Jimmy. 2021. El gobierno de El Salvador incluye un gabinete a la sombra con pupilos de Leopoldo López. El Faro (7 June). armando.info/el-gobierno-de-el-salvador-incluye-un-gabinete-a-la-sombra-con-pupilos-de-leopoldo-lopez/, accessed 29 October 2021.Google Scholar

Amaral, Oswaldo. 2021. Partidos políticos e o Governo Bolsonaro. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 111–20. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Amézquita Quintana, Constanza. 2008. Fuerzas políticas movilizadas ante el referendo de 2003 en Colombia. Análisis Político 63 (May–August): 78–102.Google Scholar

Amorim, Ana. 2021. A imprensa no Governo Bolsonaro sob os ataques à liberdade de expressão. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 467–80. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Andersen, Jørgen, and Ross, Michael. 2014. The Big Oil Change. Comparative Political Studies 47:7 (June): 993–1021.Google Scholar

Andrews-Lee, Caitlin. 2021. The Emergence and Revival of Charismatic Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Anonymous. 2018. I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration. New York Times (5 September): A23.Google Scholar

Another Round of Election Rigging: Congressional Redistricting. 2022. Economist (February 12): 17–18.Google Scholar

Anria, Santiago. 2018. When Movements Become Parties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arce, Moisés, and Carrión, Julio. 2010. Presidential Support in a Context of Crisis and Recovery in Peru, 1985–2008. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2:1 (April): 31–51.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, Craig, and Pion-Berlin, David. 2007. Issues, Threats, and Institutions. Latin American Politics and Society 49:2 (Summer): 1–31.Google Scholar

Archondo, Rafael. 2020. “Fue golpe” Pulsando el debate sobre la supuesta fascistización de Bolivia. Revista Euro Latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político 1:1 (June): 245–60.Google Scholar

Arenas, Nelly. 2009. El gobierno de Hugo Chávez. In Aibar, Julio and Vázquez, Daniel, eds. “Autoritarismo o democracia” Hugo Chávez y Evo Morales, 59–111. Tlalpan, Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar

Arnson, Cynthia, and de la Torre, Carlos. 2013. Conclusion: The Meaning and Future of Latin American Populism. In de la Torre, Carlos and Arnson, Cynthia, eds. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century, 351–76. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. (1951) 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Aslanidis, Paris. 2021. Coalition-Making under Conditions of Ideological Mismatch: The Populist Solution. International Political Science Review 42:5 (November): 631–48.Google Scholar

Assies, Willem. 2011. Bolivia’s New Constitution and Its Implications. In Pearce, Adrian, ed. Evo Morales and the Movimiento al Socialismo in Bolivia, 93–116. London: Institute for the Study of the Americas, University of London.Google Scholar

Avritzer, Leonardo, and Rennó, Lucio. 2021. The Pandemic and the Crisis of Democracy in Brazil. Journal of Politics in Latin America 13:3: 442–57.Google Scholar

Aytaç, Erdem, and Elçi, Ezgi. 2019. Populism in Turkey. In Stockemer, Daniel, ed. Populism around the World, 89–108. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Aytaç, Erdem, and Öniş, Ziya. 2014. Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context. Comparative Politics 47:1 (October): 41–59.Google Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph, Erikson, Robert, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2018. Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Elections using National Polls and District Information. PS – Political Science and Politics 51:S1 (October): 7–11.Google Scholar

Bakke, Elisabeth, and Sitter, Nick. 2022. The EU’s Enfants Terribles: Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe since 2010. Perspectives on Politics 20:1 (March): 22–37.Google Scholar

Baldini, Gianfranco, and Nels Giglioli, Matteo. 2020. Italy 2018: The Perfect Populist Storm? Parliamentary Affairs 73:2 (April): 363–84.Google Scholar

Ballesteros, Cecilia. 2021. La gente mandó al carajo todo y le dio a Bukele todo el poder. El País (25 October).Google Scholar

Bankov, Petar. 2020. The Fireman’s Ball in Bulgaria? A Comparison between Sergey Stanishev and Boyko Borisov. In Gherghina, Sergiu, ed. Party Leaders in Eastern Europe, 44–66. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bánkuti, Miklós, Halmai, Gábor, and Lane Scheppele, Kim. 2015. Hungary’s Illiberal Turn. In Krasztev, Péter and Van Til, Jon, eds. The Hungarian Patient, 37–46. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Barany, Zoltan. 2012. The Soldier and the Changing State: Building Democratic Armies in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Barany, Zoltan. 2002. Bulgaria’s Royal Elections. Journal of Democracy 13:2 (April): 141–55.Google Scholar

Barr, Robert. 2003. The Persistence of Neopopulism in Peru? From Fujimori to Toledo. Third World Quarterly 24:6 (December): 1161–78.Google Scholar

Barrenechea, Rodrigo, and Encinas, Daniel. 2022. Perú 2021: Democracia por defecto. Revista de Ciencia Política 42:2 (July): 407–38.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry. 2023. Democracy Erodes from the Top: Leaders, Citizens, and the Challenge of Populism in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bartlett, David. 1997. The Political Economy of Dual Transformations: Market Reform and Democratization in Hungary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bateman, David. 2022. Elections, Polarization, and Democratic Resilience. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 343–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baturo, Alexander, and Tolstrup, Jakob. 2022. Incumbent Takeovers. Journal of Peace Research, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Bautista, Maria. 2002. People Power 2: ‘The Revenge of the Elite on the Masses’? In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 1–42. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Bayerlein, Michael, Vanessa Boese, Scott Gates, Kamin, Katrin, and Mansoob Murshed, Syed. 2021. Populism and COVID-19: How Populist Governments (Mis)Handle the Pandemic. Kiel: Institute for the World Economy. Working paper No. 2192 (July).Google Scholar

Baykan, Toygar Sinan. 2018. The Justice and Development Party in Turkey: Populism, Personalism, Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Marc. 2014. Rafael Correa and Social Movements in Ecuador. In Ellner, Steve, ed. Latin America’s Radical Left, 127–48. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bejarano, Ana María. 2013. Politicizing Insecurity. In de la Torre, Carlos and Arnson, Cynthia, eds. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century, 323–49. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Bejarano, Ana María. 2011. Precarious Democracies: Understanding Regime Stability and Change in Colombia and Venezuela. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Belew, Kathleen. 2022. Militant Whiteness in the Age of Trump. In Zelizer, Julian, ed. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 83–102. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27:1 (January): 5–19.Google Scholar

Bermúdez, Jaime. 2010. La audacia del poder: Momentos clave del primer gobierno de Uribe contados por uno de sus protagonistas. Bogotá: Planeta.Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael. 2021. Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary. Slavic Review 80:3 (Fall): 585–607.Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael. 2020. What Do We Know about Civil Society and Regime Change Thirty Years after 1989? East European Politics 36:3 (July): 341–62.Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael. 1993. The Origins of Democratization in Poland: Workers, Intellectuals, and Oppositional Politics, 1976–1980. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bilgin, Hasret Dikici, and Erdoğan, Emre. 2018. Obscurities of a Referendum Foretold: The 2017 Constitutional Amendments in Turkey. Review of Middle East Studies 52:1 (April): 29–42.Google Scholar

Bill, Stanley, and Stanley, Ben. 2020. Whose Poland Is It To Be? East European Politics 36:3 (September): 378–94.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah. 2021. Legislative Stalemate in Postwar America, 1947–2018. In Patashnik, Eric and Schiller, Wendy, eds. Dynamics of American Democracy, 65–86. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah. 2015. The Dysfunctional Congress. Annual Review of Political Science 18: 85–101.Google Scholar

Blokker, Paul. 2020. Populism and Constitutional Reform: The Case of Italy. In Delledonne, Giacomo, Martinico, Giuseppe, Monti, Matteo, and Pacini, Fabio, eds. Italian Populism and Constitutional Law, 11–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bodnar, Adam. 2021. “Für meine Feinde das Gesetz:” Das Rechtsverständnis der PiS-Regierung in Polen. Osteuropa 71:3 (July): 99–114.Google Scholar

Bodnar, Adam. 2018. Protection of Human Rights after the Constitutional Crisis in Poland. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 66: 639–62.Google Scholar

Böhmelt, Tobias, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Lehrer, Roni. 2022. Populism and Intra-Party Democracy. European Journal of Political Research 61:4 (November): 1143–54.Google Scholar

Bogaards, Matthijs. 2018. De-democratization in Hungary. Democratization 25:8 (December): 1481–99.Google Scholar

Bolívar Meza, Rosendo. 2017. Liderazgo político: El caso de Andrés Manuel López Obrador en MORENA. Estudios Políticos 42 (November-December): 99–118.Google Scholar

Bolívar Meza, Rosendo. 2014. El Partido de la Revolución Democrática en crisis. Estudios Políticos 33 (September–December): 27–50.Google Scholar

Bologna, Alfredo. 1996. Los autogolpes en América Latina: El caso de Guatemala (1993). Estudios Internacionales 29:113 (January–March): 3–18.Google Scholar

Boloña, Carlos. 1993. Cambio de rumbo. Lima: Instituto de Economía de Libre Mercado.Google Scholar

Bonikowski, Bart. 2019. Trump’s Populism. In Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl, eds. When Democracy Trumps Populism, 110–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bornhausen, Roberto. 1991. Reflexões sobre o Brasil. Cadernos do Instituto Roberto Simonsen no. 18. São Paulo: Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo.Google Scholar

Bowden, Mark, and Teague, Matthew. 2022. The Steal: The Attempt to Overturn the 2020 Election and the People Who Stopped It. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar

Bozóki, András. 2015. Broken Democracy, Predatory State, and Nationalist Populism. In Krasztev, Péter and Van Til, Jon, eds. The Hungarian Patient, 3–36. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Branham, Alexander, Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2017. When Do the Rich Win? Political Science Quarterly 132:1 (March): 43–62.Google Scholar

Brazil’s Democratic Institutions under Attack. 2023. Latin American Weekly Report WR-23-02 (12 January): 1–3Google Scholar

Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 1991. Os Tempos Heróicos de Collor e Zélia. São Paulo: Nobel.Google Scholar

Brewer-Carías, Allan. 2010. Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brinks, Daniel, Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, Victoria. 2019. Understanding Institutional Weakness: Power and Design in Latin American Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brockmann Quiroga, Erika. 2020. Tentativa de toma gradual del poder: Prorroguismo fallido y transiciones. In Mayorga, Fernando, ed. Crisis y cambio político en Bolivia, 29–60. La Paz: CESU-UMSS (Centro de Estudios Superiores Universitarios de la Universidad Mayor de San Simón).Google Scholar

Broder, Pablo. 2005. Dos años en la era K: La economía en la postconvertibilidad. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar

Brooks, Risa. 2021. Through the Looking Glass: Trump-Era Civil-Military Relations. Strategic Studies Quarterly 15:2 (Summer): 69–98.Google Scholar

Bruhn, Kathleen. 2021. AMLO y su Partido. Política y Gobierno 28:2 (Second Semester): 19–26.Google Scholar

Bruhn, Kathleen. 2012. “To Hell with Your Corrupt Institutions!”: AMLO and Populism in Mexico. In Mudde, Cas and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, eds. Populism in Europe and the Americas, 88–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buendía and Márquez. 2021. Encuesta nacional de opinión pública: Agosto 2021. Mexico City: B & M.Google Scholar

Bukele Gears up for 2024. 2023. Latin American Weekly Report WR-23-11 (16 March): 15.Google Scholar

Bull, Benedicte, and Sánchez, Francisco. 2020. Élites y populistas: Los casos de Venezuela y Ecuador. Ibero-Americana – Nordic Journal of Latin American Studies 49:1 (December): 96–106.Google Scholar

Bull, Martin. 2007. Constitutional Referendum of June 2006. Italian Politics 22: 99–118.Google Scholar

Burni, Aline, and Tamaki, Eduardo. 2021. Populist Communication during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of Brazil’s President Bolsonaro. Partecipazione e Conflitto 14:1 (March): 113–31.Google Scholar

Burns, James MacGregor. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Busch, Andrew, and Pitney, John. 2021. Divided We Stand: The 2020 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bútora, Martin and Bútorová, Zora. 1999. Slovakia’s Democratic Awakening. Journal of Democracy 10:1 (January): 80–95.Google Scholar

Bútorová, Zora, and Bútora, Martin. 2019. The Pendulum Swing of Slovakia’s Democracy. Social Research 86:1 (Spring): 83–112.Google Scholar

Buzogány, Aron. 2017. Illiberal Democracy in Hungary. Democratization 24:7 (December): 1307–25.Google Scholar

Buzogány, Aron, and Varga, Mihai. 2021. Illiberal Thought Collectives and Policy Networks in Hungary and Poland. European Politics and Society, forthcoming: 1–19.Google Scholar

Cabada, Ladislav, and Tomšič, Matevž. 2016. The Rise of Person-Based Politics in the New Democracies: The Czech Republic and Slovenia. Politics in Central Europe 12:2 (December): 29–50.Google Scholar

Cagaptay, Soner. 2017. The New Sultan: Erdogan and the Crisis of Modern Turkey. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2012. Argentina: The Persistence of Peronism. Journal of Democracy 23:2 (April): 148–61.Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell. 2018. Making Sense of Competitive Authoritarianism. Latin American Politics and Society 60:2 (May): 1–22.Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell. 2011. Peru: The Left Turn that Wasn’t. In Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, 375–98. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell. 2006. Endogenous Regime Breakdown. In Carrión, Julio, ed. The Fujimori Legacy, 268–93. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell. 1998a. Latin American autogolpes. Third World Quarterly 19:2 (May): 219–39.Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell. 1998b. Self-Coups: Peru, Guatemala, Russia. Journal of Democracy 9:1 (January): 125–39.Google Scholar

Campello, Daniela. 2022. When Incompetence Meets Bad Luck: Bolsonaro’s Third Year in the Brazilian Presidency. Revista de Ciencia Política 42:2 (July): 203–23.Google Scholar

Carey, John, Clayton, Katherine, et al. 2022. Who Will Defend Democracy? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 32:1 (February): 230–45.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Michael. 1997. Slovakia and the Triumph of Nationalist Populism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30:2 (June): 205–20.Google Scholar

Carrera, Jorge. 1994. La política económica de la delegación. In Anales de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política. XXIX Reunión Annual, vol. 2, 339–63. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar

Carrillo Nieto, Juan. 2020. El segundo año de gobierno de López Obrador en México. Revista de Estudios Internacionales 2:2 (July–December): 298–315.Google Scholar

Carrión, Julio. 2022. A Dynamic Theory of Populism in Power: The Andes in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carrión, Julio. 2006b. Public Opinion, Market Reforms, and Democracy in Fujimori’s Peru. In Carrión, Julio, ed. The Fujimori Legacy, 126–49. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Carrión, Julio, ed. 2006a. The Fujimori Legacy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Castillo Impeached and Arrested after Attempted Self-Coup Backfires. 2022. Latin American Weekly Report WR-22-49 (8 December): 1–3.Google Scholar

Castle, Marjorie, and Taras, Ray. 2002. Democracy in Poland, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Casullo, María, and Freidenberg, Flavia. 2017. Populist Parties of Latin America. In Heinisch, Reinhard, Holtz-Bacha, Christina, and Mazzoleni, Oscar, eds. Political Populism: A Handbook, 293–306. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Cavallo, Domingo. 1997. El Peso de la Verdad. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar

CEC (Centro de Estudios Ciudadanos, Universidad Francisco Gavidia). 2021. Los Salvadoreños evalúan dos años de gobierno del presidente Nayib Bukele. San Salvador: CEC.Google Scholar

CEDATOS. 2012. Opinión CEDATOS: Aprobación Presidentes del Ecuador, 1979–2011. Quito: CEDATOS.Google Scholar

Ceresole, Norberto. 2000. Caudillo, Ejército, Pueblo. Madrid: Estudios Hispano-árabes.Google Scholar

Chacko, Priya. 2018. The Right Turn in India: Authoritarianism, Populism, and Neoliberalisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48:4 (August): 541–65.Google Scholar

Chambers, Paul. 2013. Military “Shadows” in Thailand since the 2006 Coup. Asian Affairs: An American Review 40:2 (April): 67–82.Google Scholar

Charlemagne: Return to Centre. 2023. Economist (4 February): 49.Google Scholar

Cheibub, José. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheresky, Isidoro. 2006. In the Name of the People: The Possibilities and Limits of a Government Relying on Public Opinion. In Epstein, Edward and Pion-Berlin, David, eds. Broken Promises? The Argentine Crisis and Argentine Democracy, 205–27. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar

Cherny, Nicolás. 2014. La relación presidente – partido de gobierno en el Kirchnerismo. In Novaro, Marcos, ed. Peronismo y democracia, 143–59. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.Google Scholar

Chiaramonte, Alessandro, De Sio, Lorenzo, and Emanuele, Vincenzo. 2020. Salvini’s Success and the Collapse of the Five-Star Movement. Contemporary Italian Politics 12:2 (June): 140–54.Google Scholar

Chhibber, Pradeep, and Verma, Rahul. 2019. The Rise of the Second Dominant Party System in India: BJP’s New Social Coalition in 2019. Studies in Indian Politics 7:2 (December): 131–48.Google Scholar

Cholova, Blagovesta, and De Waele, Jean-Michel. 2011. Bulgaria: A Fertile Ground for Populism? Slovak Journal of Political Science 11:1 (January): 25–54.Google Scholar

Chowkwanyun, Merlin. 2022. The 60/40 Problem: Trump, Culpability, and COVID-19. In Zelizer, Julian, ed. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 315–34. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Christofis, Nikos. 2020. Introduction: Accelerating Political Crisis in Erdoğan’s Turkey. In Christofis, Nikos, ed. Erdog˘an’s ‘New’ Turkey, 1–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chumacero, Rómulo. 2019. El camaleón, el mutante y Houdini: Resultados de las elecciones en Bolivia. Santiago: Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Economía.Google Scholar

Cirhan, Tomáš, and Kopecký, Petr. 2020. From Ideology to Interest-Driven Politics: Václav Klaus, Andrej Babiš and Two Eras of Party Leadership in the Czech Republic. In Gherghina, Sergiu, ed. Party Leaders in Eastern Europe, 93–119. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cleary, Matthew, and Öztürk, Aykut. 2022. When Does Backsliding Lead to Breakdown? Perspectives on Politics 20:1 (March): 205–21.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean. 2019. What’s Wrong with the Normative Theory (and the Actual Practice) of Left Populism. Constellations 26:3 (September): 391–407.Google Scholar

Cole, Wade, and Schofer, Evan. 2023. Destroying Democracy for the People: The Economic, Social, and Political Consequences of Populist Rule, 1990–2017. Social Problems, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Colectivo de Abogados José Alvear Restrepo. 2003. Hacia un Estado autoritario. In Plataforma Colombiana de Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Desarrollo, ed. El embrujo autoritario, 15–24. Bogotá: Plataforma Colombiana.Google Scholar

Collor de Mello, Fernando. 1995. Author interview with Brazilian ex-president (1990–92), Brasília: 9 June.Google Scholar

Colombia: Still Armed, Still Dangerous. 2021. Economist (27 November): 35–37.Google Scholar

Coman, Ramona, and Volintiru, Clara. 2021. Anti-Liberal Ideas and Institutional Change in Central and Eastern Europe. European Politics and Society, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Conaghan, Catherine. 2016. Delegative Democracy Revisited. Journal of Democracy 27:3 (July): 109–118.Google Scholar

Conaghan, Catherine. 2011. Ecuador: Rafael Correa and the Citizens’ Revolution. In Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, 261–82. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Conaghan, Catherine. 2005. Fujimori’s Peru. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Conaghan, Catherine. 1995. Polls, Political Discourse, and the Public Sphere. In Smith, Peter, ed. Latin America in Comparative Perspective, 227–55. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Connelly, John. 2020. From Peoples into Nations: A History of Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Connolly, William. 2017. Aspirational Fascism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Constantino-David, Karina. 2002. Surviving Erap. In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 212–26. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Cooley, Jason. 2018. American Exceptionalism during the Populist Wave. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 42:1 (Winter): 27–38.Google Scholar

Corasaniti, Nick. 2022. Raffensperger Fends Off a 2020 Election Denier to Win Georgia’s G.O.P. Secretary of State Primary. New York Times (25 May).Google Scholar

Corasaniti, Nick, and Epstein, Reid. 2022. State Courts Emerge as Firewall Against Gerrymandering by Both Parties. New York Times (3 April): 25.Google Scholar

Cornell, Agnes, Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2020. Democratic Stability in an Age of Crisis: Reassessing the Interwar Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cornell, Agnes, Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2017. The Real Lessons of the Interwar Years. Journal of Democracy 28:3 (July): 14–28.Google Scholar

Coronil, Fernando. 2011. State Reflections: The 2002 Coup against Hugo Chávez. In Ponniah, Thomas and Eastwood, Jonathan, eds. The Revolution in Venezuela: Social and Political Change under Chávez, 37–65. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2022. Autocracy Rising: Venezuela’s Transition to Authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2020. Trump’s Defeat Was World Historic. Foreign Policy (November 17) <https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/17/trump-populist-authoritarian-defeat-biden/, accessed 22 February 2022>..>Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2018. Fixing Democracy: Why Constitutional Change Often Fails to Enhance Democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2015. The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela. Journal of Democracy 26:2 (April): 37–51.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2011. Why Polarize? Advantages and Disadvantages of a Rational-Choice Analysis of Government-Opposition Relations under Hugo Chávez. In Ponniah, Thomas and Eastwood, Jonathan, eds. The Revolution in Venezuela: Social and Political Change under Chávez, 67–97. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2010. The Repeating Revolution. In Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raúl, and Hunter, Wendy, eds. Leftist Governments in Latin America, 28–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 2002. Presidents without Parties: The Politics of Economic Reform in Argentina and Venezuela in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier. 1997. Why Argentines Followed Cavallo. In Domínguez, Jorge, ed. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s, 49–93. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier, Hernández, Gonzalo, and Salgado, Juan. 2020. Oil and Regime Type in Latin America. Energy Policy 142 (July).Google Scholar

Corrales, Javier, and Penfold, Michael. 2011. Dragon in the Tropics. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Correa, Rafael. 2003. La política económica del gobierno de Lucio Gutiérrez. Íconos 16 (May): 6–10.Google Scholar

Couto, Cláudio Gonçalves. 2021. Do governo-movimento ao pacto militar-fisiológico. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 35–49. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary, and Morgenstern, Scott. 2001. Latin America’s Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents. Comparative Politics 33:2 (January): 171–89.Google Scholar

Cramer, Katherine. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cristova, Christiana. 2010. Populism: The Bulgarian Case. Sociedade e Cultura 13:2 (July–December): 221–32.Google Scholar

Csehi, Robert. 2019. Neither Episodic, nor Destined to Failure? The Endurance of Hungarian Populism after 2010. Democratization 26:6 (September): 1011–27.Google Scholar

Csehi, Robert, and Zgut, Edit. 2021. ‘We Won’t Let Brussels Dictate Us’: Eurosceptic Populism in Hungary and Poland. European Politics and Society 22:1 (February): 53–68.Google Scholar

Cunha Filho, Clayton, Coelho, André, and Pérez Flores, Fidel. 2013. A Right-to-Left Policy Switch? An Analysis of the Honduran Case under Manuel Zelaya. International Political Science Review 34:5 (November): 519–42.Google Scholar

Curato, Nicole. 2017. Flirting with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47:1 (March): 142–53.Google Scholar

Curato, Nicole, and Yonaha, Yvan. 2022. Rodrigo Duterte: Macho Populism and Authoritarian Practice. In Larres, Klaus, ed. Dictators and Autocrats, 384–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Çarkoğlu, Ali, and Hinich, Melvin. 2006. A Spatial Analysis of Turkish Party Preferences. Electoral Studies 25:2 (June): 369–92.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dallara, Cristina. 2015. Powerful Resistance against a Long-Running Personal Crusade: The Impact of Silvio Berlusconi on the Italian Judicial System. Modern Italy 20:1 (February): 59–76.Google Scholar

Dargent, Eduardo. 2021. Perú, entre la crispación y la mediocridad. New York Times (23 September) <www.nytimes.com/es/2021/09/23/espanol/opinion/pedro-castillo-peru.html, accessed 24 September 2021>..>Google Scholar

Dargent, Eduardo. 2009. Demócratas precarios: Élites y debilidad democrática en el Perú y América Latina. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Dargent, Eduardo, and Rousseau, Stéphanie. 2021. Perú 2020: ¿El quiebre de la continuidad? Revista de Ciencia Política 41:2 (August): 377–400.Google Scholar

David, Randolf. 2002. Erap: A Diary of Disenchantment. In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 148–79. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Davies, Norman. 2005. God’s Playground: History of Poland, vol. 2: 1795 to the Present, revised ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

De Dios, Emmanuel. 2002. Corruption and the Fall. In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 43–61. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2019. Donald Trump and the Lessons of East-Central European Populism. In Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl, eds. When Democracy Trumps Populism, 60–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2012. Populism, Democracy, and Nationalism in Slovakia. In Mudde, Cas and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, eds. Populism in Europe and the Americas, 182–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Faro, Clovis, ed. 1991. A Economia pós Plano Collor II. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.Google Scholar

De Faro, Clovis, ed. 1990. Plano Collor: Avaliações e Perspectivas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.Google Scholar

Degregori, Carlos, and Grompone, Romeo. 1991. Elecciones 1990: Demonios y redentores en el nuevo Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos, ed. 2019. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos. 2018. Ecuador after Correa. Journal of Democracy 29:4 (October): 77–88.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos. 2017a. Hugo Chávez and the Diffusion of Bolivarianism. Democratization 24:7 (December): 1271–88.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos. 2017b. Populism in Latin America. In Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 195–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos. 2015. De Velasco a Correa. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos, and Srisa-nga, Treethep. 2022. Global Populisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Delić, Anuška. 2020. Europe’s New Orban. Index on Censorship 49:4 (December): 39–41.Google Scholar

Deloy, Corinne. 2012. The Future of Romania, the Focus of the Referendum on the Impeachment of the President of the Republic Traian Basescu. Paris: Fondation Robert Schuman. Analysis D-15 (29 July).Google Scholar

Democracy in India. 2022. Economist (12 February): 29–30.Google Scholar

De Nadal, Lluis. 2021. On Populism and Social Movements: From the Indignados to Podemos. Social Movement Studies 20:1 (January): 36–56.Google Scholar

Diamint, Rut. 2006. Crisis, Democracy, and the Military in Argentina. In Epstein, Edward and Pion-Berlin, David, eds. Broken Promises? The Argentine Crisis and Argentine Democracy, 163–79. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar

Dinçşahin, Şakir. 2012. A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party’s Populism in Turkey. Government and Opposition 47:4 (Autumn): 618–40.Google Scholar

Dionne, Eugene, Ornstein, Norman, and Mann, Thomas. 2017. One Nation after Trump. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael, and Chu, Michael. 2018. Lawyers as Activists. In Meyer, David and Tarrow, Sidney, eds. The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement, 127–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dornbusch, Rüdiger, and Edwards, Sebastian, eds. 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Downs, Gregory. 2022. Impeachment after Trump. In Zelizer, Julian, ed. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 351–72. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dragoman, Dragoş. 2013. Post-Accession Backsliding in Romania. South-East European Journal of Political Science 1:3 (July–September): 27–46.Google Scholar

Draper, Robert. 2022. The Mystery of Michael Flynn. New York Times Magazine (February 13): 32–39, 45.Google Scholar

Dresser, Denise. 2022. Mexico’s Dying Democracy. Foreign Affairs 101:6 (November–December): 74–90.Google Scholar

Dweck, Esther. 2021. A agenda neoliberal em marcha forçada. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 241–54. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Echegaray, Fabián, and Elordi, Carlos. 2001. Public Opinion, Presidential Popularity, and Economic Reform in Argentina, 1989–1996. In Stokes, Susan, ed. Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies, 187–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit). 2023. Democracy Index 2022: Frontline Democracy and the Battle for Ukraine. London: EIU.Google Scholar

El Salvador: Bukele’s Bulldozer. 2021. Economist (8 May): 34–35.Google Scholar

Elff, Martin, and Ziaja, Sebastian. 2018. Methods Factors in Democracy Indicators. Politics and Governance 6:1 (March): 92–102.Google Scholar

Elizondo, Carlos. 2021. Y mi palabra es la ley: AMLO en Palacio Nacional. Mexico City: Debate.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ellner, Steve. 2008. Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: Class, Conflict, and the Chávez Phenomenon. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Encarnación, Omar. 2002. Venezuela’s “Civil Society Coup.” World Policy Journal 19:2 (July): 38–48.Google Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt. 2020. Right-Wing Authoritarian Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics 36:3 (September): 363–77.Google Scholar

Epstein, Edward, and Pion-Berlin, David. 2006. The Crisis of 2001 and Argentine Democracy. In Epstein, Edward and Pion-Berlin, David, eds. Broken Promises? The Argentine Crisis and Argentine Democracy, 3–26. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar

Epstein, Reid. 2022. Scheme to Reinstall Trump Opens a Schism in Wisconsin G.O.P. New York Times (February 20): 1, 17.Google Scholar

Erdogan’s Empire. 2023. Economist. Special Report: Turkey (January 21): 1–12.Google Scholar

Escobari, Diego, and Hoover, Gary. 2020. Evo Morales and Electoral Fraud in Bolivia: A Natural Experiment and Discontinuity Evidence. Edinburg: University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Department of Economics and Finance.Google Scholar

Esen, Berk, and Gumuscu, Sebnem. 2018. The Perils of “Turkish Presidentialism.” Review of Middle East Studies 52:1 (April): 43–53.Google Scholar

Esen, Berk, and Gumuscu, Sebnem. 2016. Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly 37:9 (September): 1581–606.Google Scholar

Espino, Luis Antonio. 2021. López Obrador: El poder del discurso populista. Mexico City: Turner.Google Scholar

Etchemendy, Sebastián, and Garay, Candelaria. 2011. Argentina: Left Populism in Comparative Perspective, 2003–2009. In Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, 283–305. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

EU eröffnet Verfahren gegen Ungarn. 2022. Deutsche Welle (27 April).Google Scholar

EU (European Union). EEM (Election Expert Mission). 2020. Bolivia 2019: Final Report. Brussels: EU.Google Scholar

Ezquerro-Cañete, Arturo, and Fogel, Ramón. 2017. A Coup Foretold: Fernando Lugo in Paraguay. Journal of Agrarian Change 17:2 (April): 279–95.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Richard, and Kurtz-Phelan, Daniel. 2006. Nicaragua between “Caudillismo” and Modernity. World Policy Journal 23:2 (July): 76–84.Google Scholar

Fella, Stefano, and Ruzza, Carlo. 2013. Populism and the Fall of the Centre-Right in Italy. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 21:1 (May): 38–52.Google Scholar

Fernández, Cristina, and Villar, Leonardo. 2014. Bonanzas temporales de recursos. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo.Google Scholar

Fernández Camacho, Carmen. 2004. La oposición al autogolpe de Serrano Elías. Ámbitos 11–12 (1st and 2nd Semester): 237–59.Google Scholar

Ferreira Rubio, Delia, and Goretti, Matteo 1998. When the President Governs Alone: The Decretazo in Argentina, 1989–93. In Carey, John and Shugart, Matthew, eds. Executive Decree Authority, 33–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

FES (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung). n.d. Innenpolitische Entwicklung seit der Selbstständigkeit. Bonn-Bad Godesberg: FES.Google Scholar

Fierro, Marta. 2014. Álvaro Uribe Vélez: Populismo y neopopulismo. Análisis Político 27:81 (May–August): 127–47.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar

Fish, Steven. 1999. The End of Meciarism. East European Constitutional Review 8: 1–2 (Winter-Spring): 47–55.Google Scholar

Flannery, Nathaniel. 2013. Calderón’s War. Journal of International Affairs 66:2 (Spring–Summer): 181–96.Google Scholar

Flores-Macías, Gustavo. 2022. Contemporary State Building: Elite Taxation and Public Safety in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foa, Roberto, and Mounk, Yascha. 2021. America after Trump: From “Clean” to “Dirty” Democracy? Policy Studies 42: 5–6 (September): 455–72.Google Scholar

Foa, Roberto, Romero-Vidal, Xavier, et al. 2022. The Great Reset: Public Opinion, Populism, and the Pandemic. Cambridge: Centre for the Future of Democracy, Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Foley, Michael. 2013. Barack Obama and the Calculus of Presidential Ambiguity. Political Studies Review 11:3 (September): 345–57.Google Scholar

Forgettable Populist. 2022. Economist (January 8): 35.Google Scholar

Fracanzani, Edoardo. 2021. Norms under Siege: The Parallel Political Lives of Donald Trump and Silvio Berlusconi. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar

Frantz, Erica, Kendall-Taylor, Andrea, Li, Jia, and Wright, Joseph. 2022. Personalist Ruling Parties in Democracies. Democratization 29:5 (July): 918–38.Google Scholar

Freedom House (FH). 2022a. Freedom in the World 2022. Washington, DC: FH.Google Scholar

Freedom House (FH). 2022b. Freedom in the World 2022. Country Report: Hungary. Washington, DC: FH.Google Scholar

Freedom House (FH). 2022c. Freedom in the World 2022. Country Report: Poland. Washington, DC: FH.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, Flavia. 2015. ¡En tierra de caciques! Revista Opera 16 (January–June): 99–130.Google Scholar

Fujimori, Alberto. 1992. Hacia la reconstrucción nacional. Mensaje a la Nación y Memoria Anual, 2º año de gobierno. Lima: Secretaría General de la Presidencia.Google Scholar

Furlong, Paul. 2015. Silvio Berlusconi and the Italian Presidency. Modern Italy 20:1 (February): 77–90.Google Scholar

Galarraga Cortázar, Naiara. 2021. La caótica gestión de la pandemia impulsa las peticiones de ‘impeachment’ contra Bolsonaro. El País (27 January).Google Scholar

Galindo Hernández, Carolina. 2007. Neopopulismo en Colombia. Íconos 27 (January): 147–62.Google Scholar

Gálvez Borrell, Víctor. 2011. El golpe de Estado de 1993 en Guatemala. Espacios Políticos 4:5 (September): 47–80.Google Scholar

Gamboa, Laura. 2017. Opposition at the Margins. Comparative Politics 49:4 (July): 457–77.Google Scholar

Ganev, Venelin. 2018. “Soft Decisionism” in Bulgaria. Journal of Democracy 29:3 (July): 91–103.Google Scholar

Ganev, Venelin. 1999. Bulgaria. In Elgie, Robert, ed. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, 124–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Miguel, and Rodríguez-Raga, Juan. 2019. Personality and an Internal Enemy: Understanding the Popularity of Álvaro Uribe, 2002–2010. Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública 8:2 (Second semester): 99–123.Google Scholar

Garrido, Marco. 2022. The Ground for the Illiberal Turn in the Philippines. Democratization 29:4 (July): 673–91.Google Scholar

Gavarrete, Julia. 2021. In El Salvador, Bukele Reigns Supreme. NACLA – Report on the Americas 53:2 (Summer): 115–17.Google Scholar

Gellman, Barton. 2022. January 6 Was Practice. The Atlantic 329:1 (January–February): 24–44.Google Scholar

Germani, Gino. 1978. Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012. Concepts. Chap. in Social Science Methodology, 2nd ed., 107–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, and Weitzel, Daniel. 2023. Measuring Electoral Democracy with Observables. Ms. University of Texas at Austin, Department of Government.Google Scholar

Gervasoni, Carlos. 2015. Libertades y derechos políticos, 2003–2014: El Kirchnerismo evaluado desde siete modelos de democracia. In Gervasoni, Carlos and Peruzzotti, Enrique, eds. “Década Ganada” Evaluando el legado del Kirchnerismo, 19–60. Buenos Aires: Debate.Google Scholar

Gherghina, Sergiu, and Soare, Sorina. 2021. Electoral Performance Beyond Leaders? The Organization of Populist Parties in Postcommunist Europe. Party Politics 27:1 (January): 58–68.Google Scholar

Ghodsee, Kristen. 2008. Left Wing, Right Wing, Everything. Problems of Post-Communism 55:3 (May–June): 26–39.Google Scholar

Gibson, Nadine, and Shaw, Daron. 2019. Politics as Usual? Exploring Issues and the 2016 Presidential Vote. Social Science Quarterly 100:2 (April): 447–65.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2006. Out of the Frying Pan into the Fire: Behavioral Reactions to Terrorist Attacks. Risk Analysis 26:2 (April): 347–51.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12:3 (September): 564–81.Google Scholar

Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale, and Kahneman, Daniel, eds. 2002. Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz. 2018a. Democracy’s Near Misses. Journal of Democracy 29:4 (October): 16–30.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz. 2018b. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra, and Sadurski, Wojciech. 2021. The Judgment that Wasn’t (But which Nearly Brought Poland to a Standstill). European Constitutional Law Review 17:1 (March): 130–53.Google Scholar

Goodman, Peter. 2018. The West Saw a Democracy; Turkey Embraced an Autocrat. New York Times (19 August): A1, A10.Google Scholar

Gomez, Gabriel, and Leunig, Sven. 2022. Fidesz, Liberal Democracy and the Fundamental Law in Hungary. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 32:3 (September): 655–82.Google Scholar

Graber, Mark, Levinson, Sanford, and Tushnet, Mark, eds. 2018. Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Graham, Carol, and Kane, Cheikh. 1998. Opportunistic Government or Sustaining Reform? Latin American Research Review 33:1: 67–104.Google Scholar

Graham, Matthew, and Svolik, Milan. 2020. Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review 114:2 (May): 392–409.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:6 (May): 1360–80.Google Scholar

Graphic Detail: Gerrymandering. 2022. Economist (4 June): 81.Google Scholar

Gray Molina, George. 2010. The Challenge of Progressive Change under Evo Morales. In Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raúl, and Hunter, Wendy, eds. 2010. Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings, 57–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grofman, Bernard. 2022. Prospects for Democratic Breakdown in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 20:3 (September): 1040–47.Google Scholar

Grossmann, Matt. 2021. Incremental Liberalism or Prolonged Partisan Warfare. In Patashnik, Eric and Schiller, Wendy, eds. Dynamics of American Democracy, 40–62. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2019. How Populists Rule: The Consequences for Democratic Governance. Polity 51:4 (October): 707–17.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2018. Poland Path’s to Illiberalism. Current History 117:797 (March): 96–101.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2017. Global Populisms and Their Impact. Slavic Review 76:S1 (August): S3–S8.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guasti, Petra. 2020. Populism in Power and Democracy in the Czech Republic. Politics and Governance 8:4 (December): 473–84.Google Scholar

Guasti, Petra, and Buštiková, Lenka. 2022. Pandemic Power Grabs. Paper for conference on “Still the Age of Populism?” University of Florida, Gainesville, April 22–23.Google Scholar

Guiler, Kimberly. 2021. From Prison to Parliament: Victimhood, Identity, and Electoral Support. Mediterranean Politics 26:2 (April): 168–97.Google Scholar

Gurov, Boris, and Zankina, Emilia. 2013. Populism and the Construction of Political Charisma: Post-Transition Politics in Bulgaria. Problems of Post-Communism 60:1 (January–February): 3–17.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Raquel, Tapia, Luis, Prada, Raúl, and García Linera, Álvaro. 2002. Democratizaciones Plebeyas. La Paz: Muela del Diablo.Google Scholar

Gwiazda, Anna. 2016. Democracy in Poland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gyárfášová, Ol’ga, and Učeň, Peter. 2020. Radical Party Politics and Mobilization Against It in the Slovak Parliamentary Elections 2020. Politologický Cˇasopis – Czech Journal of Political Science 27:3 (October): 323–52.Google Scholar

Hadiz, Vedi. 2014. A New Islamic Populism and the Contradictions of Development. Journal of Contemporary Asia 44:1 (January): 125–43.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 2021. Backsliding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Ian. 2022. Narendra Modi: Elected Authoritarian. In Larres, Klaus, ed. Dictators and Autocrats, 191–203. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter. 2016. Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time. In Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia, and Sheingate, Adam, eds., Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, 31–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hallock, Jeffrey, and Call, Charles. 2021. The Biopolitical President? Sovereign Power and Democratic Erosion in El Salvador. Democratization 28:8 (December): 1583–601.Google Scholar

Hanley, Seán, and Vachudova, Milada. 2018. Understanding the Illiberal Turn in the Czech Republic. East European Politics 34:3 (September): 276–96.Google Scholar

Harper, Jo. 2021. Our Man in Warszawa: How the West Misread Poland. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Harten, Sven. 2011. Towards a ‘Traditional Party’? Internal Organisation and Change in the MAS in Bolivia. In Pearce, Adrian, ed. Evo Morales and the Movimiento al Socialismo in Bolivia, 63–91. London: Institute for the Study of the Americas, University of London.Google Scholar

Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Haughton, Tim. 2003. Facilitator and Impeder: The Institutional Framework of Slovak Politics during the Premiership of Vladimír Mečiar. Slavonic and East European Review 81:2 (April): 267–90.Google Scholar

Haughton, Tim. 2002. Vladimír Mečiar and his Role in the 1994–1998 Slovak Coalition Government. Europe-Asia Studies 54:8 (December): 1319–38.Google Scholar

Haughton, Tim. 2001. HZDS: The Ideology, Organisation and Support Base of Slovakia’s Most Successful Party. Europe-Asia Studies 53:5 (July): 745–69.Google Scholar

Haughton, Tim, and Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2015. Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 29:1 (February): 61–80.Google Scholar

Haughton, Tim, and Rybář, Marek. 2008. A Change of Direction: The 2006 Parliamentary Elections and Party Politics in Slovakia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24:2 (June): 232–55.Google Scholar

Havler-Barrett, Chris. 2020. Ganging Up against the Truth: El Salvador’s Government Do Not Want You to Hear about a Potential Deal They’ve Made with the Country’s Biggest Gang. Index on Censorship 49:4 (December): 32–34.Google Scholar

Havlík, Vlastimil. 2019. Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism 66:6 (November): 369–84.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk. 2010. Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk, Carlin, Ryan, Littvay, Levente, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, eds. 2019. The Ideational Approach to Populism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk, and Littvay, Levente. 2019. Contemporary US Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2017a. The Ideational Approach to Populism. Latin American Research Review 52:4: 513–28.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2017b. What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach Us, and What It Can’t. Swiss Political Science Review 23:4 (December): 526–42.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Kirk, and Selway, Joel. 2017. Thaksin the Populist? Chinese Political Science Review 2:3 (September): 372–94.Google Scholar

Hawley, George. 2021. The Stillborn Revolution: The Failure of Right-Wing Populism in the United States. In Pereyra Doval, Gisela and Souroujon, Gastón, eds. Global Resurgence of the Right, 255–69. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haydanka, Yevheniy. 2021. Authoritization or Democratization: Directions of Electoral Processes in Present-Day Slovakia. Journal of Comparative Politics 14:2: 4–15.Google Scholar

Hein, Michael. 2015. The Fight against Government Corruption in Romania. Europe-Asia Studies 67:5 (July): 747–76.Google Scholar

Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hellinger, Daniel. 2007. When “No” Means “Yes to Revolution:” Electoral Politics in Bolivarian Venezuela. In Ellner, Steve and Tinker Salas, Miguel, eds. Venezuela: Hugo Chávez and the Decline of an “Exceptional Democracy,” 157–84. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hellmann, Olli. 2017. Populism in East Asia. In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul et al., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 161–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen. 2017. Institutions on the Edge: The Origins and Consequences of Inter-Branch Crises in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herbert, Jon. 2021. Governing in Conflict or Cooperation? Trump’s Populism and the Republican Party. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 17:1 (July): 89–117.Google Scholar

Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2022. Conservative Extra-Party Coalitions and State-House Democracy. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 320–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hewison, Kevin, and Kitirianglarp, Kengkij. 2010. ‘Thai-Style Democracy’: The Royalist Struggle for Thailand’s Politics. In Ivarsson, Søren and Isager, Lotte, eds. Saying the Unsayable: Monarchy and Democracy in Thailand, 179–202. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.Google Scholar

Heydarian, Richard. 2022. The Return of the Marcos Dynasty. Journal of Democracy 33:3 (July): 62–76.Google Scholar

Higgins, Andrew. 2021. Populist Leader of Czech Republic Narrowly Defeated in Election. New York Times (9 October) <www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/world/europe/andrej-babis-defeated-czech-republic.html, accessed 14 October 2021>..>Google Scholar

Hinton, Alexander. 2021. It Can Happen Here: White Power and the Rising Threat of Genocide in the US. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert. 1982. Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2006. Rethinking Presidentialism. Comparative Politics 38:4 (July): 401–18.Google Scholar

Hofbauer, Hannes, and Noack, David. 2012. Slowakei: Der mühsame Weg nach Westen. Vienna: Promedia.Google Scholar

Hollyer, James, Klašnja, Marko, and Titiunik, Rocío. 2022. Parties as Disciplinarians: Charisma and Commitment Problems in Programmatic Campaigning. American Journal of Political Science 66:1 (January): 75–92.Google Scholar

Homans, Charles, Ulloa, Jazmine, and Hounshell, Blake. 2022. Slice of Voters Averted Threat to Fair Elections. New York Times (25 December): 1, 16.Google Scholar

Howell, William, and Moe, Terry. 2020. Presidents, Populism, and the Crisis of Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Howell, William, and Moe, Terry. 2016. Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Huber, Robert, and Schimpf, Christian. 2017. Populism and Democracy. In Heinisch, Reinhard, Holtz-Bacha, Christina, and Mazzoleni, Oscar, eds. Political Populism: A Handbook, 329–44. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Hughes, Tyler, and Becker, Lawrence. 2021. Trump and the 2018 Midterms. In Rutledge, Paul and Rackaway, Chapman, eds. The Unorthodox Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 86–106. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Hunter, Wendy. 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy. 2023. Lula’s Second Act. Journal of Democracy 34:1 (January): 126–40.Google Scholar

Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy. 2019. Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash. Journal of Democracy 30:1 (January): 68–82.Google Scholar

Hunter, Wendy, and Vega, Diego. 2022. Populism and the Military: Symbiosis and Tension in Bolsonaro’s Brazil. Democratization 29:2 (February): 337–59.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. 1981. American Politics: Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hurtado Miller, Juan. 1992. 201 días de gestión. Lima: N.p.Google Scholar

Ibarra, Hernán. 1997. La caída de Bucaram. Ecuador Debate 40 (April): 21–33.Google Scholar

Idrobo, Nicolás, Kronick, Dorothy, and Rodríguez, Francisco. 2022. Do Shifts in Late-Counted Votes Signal Fraud? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Politics 84:4 (October): 2202–15.Google Scholar

Iguíñiz, Javier. 1991. Perú: Ajuste e inflación en el Plan Fujimori. In Rozenwurcel, Guillermo, ed. Elecciones y política en América Latina, 387–432. Buenos Aires: Tesis.Google Scholar

Impact of Gang Crackdown Acknowledged. 2023. Latin American Weekly Report WR-23-06 (9 February): 14.Google Scholar

In His Image: The Republican Party. 2022. Economist (1 January): 16–18.Google Scholar

Indian Democracy: Nobbling Rahul Gandhi. 2023. Economist (1 April): 29.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Issacharoff, Samuel. 2023. Democracy Unmoored: Populism and the Corruption of Popular Sovereignty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

IUDOP (Instituto Universitario de Opinión Pública, Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas – UCA). 2022. Evaluación ciudadana del tercer año del presidente Nayib Bukele. Boletín de Prensa 36:3 (June): 1–46.Google Scholar

IUDOP (Instituto Universitario de Opinión Pública, Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas – UCA). 2020. Sondeo de opinión sobre el primer año del Gobierno del presidente Nayib Bukele y el manejo de la pandemia COVID-19. Boletín de Prensa 34:4 (July): 1–22.Google Scholar

IUDOP (Instituto Universitario de Opinión Pública, Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas – UCA). 2019. Encuesta poselectoral de las elecciones presidenciales de 2019. San Salvador: IUDOP. UCA.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence, and Choate, Judd. 2022. Democratic Capacity: Election Administration as Bulwark and Target. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science 699 (January): 22–35.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Nicholas, and Milkis, Sidney. 2021. Our “Undivided Support:” Donald Trump, the Republican Party, and Executive-Centered Partisanship. In Patashnik, Eric and Schiller, Wendy, eds. Dynamics of American Democracy, 291–322. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary. 2019. Extreme Referendums: Donald Trump and the 2018 Midterm Elections. Political Science Quarterly 134:1 (Spring): 9–38.Google Scholar

Jaffrelot, Christophe. 2021. Modi’s India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jardina, Ashley, and Mickey, Robert. 2022. White Racial Solidarity and Opposition to American Democracy. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science 699 (January): 79–89.Google Scholar

Johnston, Jake, and Rosnick, David. 2020. Observing the Observers: The OAS in the 2019 Bolivian Elections. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.Google Scholar

Jonas, Susanne. 1995. Electoral Problems and the Democratic Project in Guatemala. In Seligson, Mitchell and Booth, John, eds. Elections and Democracy in Central America, Revisited, enlarged ed., 25–44. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Erik. 2023. Italy’s Hard Truths. Journal of Democracy 34:1 (January): 21–35.Google Scholar

Jornal do Brasil. 2020. “E daí?”, diz Bolsonaro sobre número recorde de mortes por Covid-19 no Brasil. April 29. <www.jb.com.br/pais/politica/2020/04/1023526--e-dai----diz-bolsonaro-sobre-numero-recorde-de-mortes-por-covid-19-no-brasil.html>..>Google Scholar

Judicial Independence Stressed as SCJN Enters New Era. 2023. Latin American Weekly Report WR-23-06 (9 February): 13.Google Scholar

Juego, Bonn. 2017. The Philippines 2017: Duterte-Led Authoritarian Populism and Its Liberal-Democratic Roots. Asia Maior 28: 129–63.Google Scholar

Jungkunz, Sebastian, Fahey, Robert, and Hino, Airo. 2021. How Populist Attitudes Scales Fail to Capture Support for Populists in Power. PLOS One 16:12 (December): 1–20.Google Scholar

Kabashima, Ikuo, and Steel, Gill. 2007. How Junichiro Koizumi Seized the Leadership of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party. Japanese Journal of Political Science 8:1 (April): 95–114.Google Scholar

Kada, Naoko. 2003. Impeachment as a Punishment for Corruption? The Cases of Brazil and Venezuela. In Baumgartner, Jody and Kada, Naoko, eds. Checking Executive Power: Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective, 113–35. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kalb, Johanna, and Bannon, Alicia. 2018. Courts under Pressure. New York University Law Review 93: 1–6.Google Scholar

Kanev, Dobrin. 2013. Parliamentary Elections in Bulgaria 2013. SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe 16:1: 21–35.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Robert, and Haggard, Stephan. 2019. Democratic Decline in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 17:2 (June): 417–32.Google Scholar

Kazin, Michael. 2022. The Path of Most Resistance: How Democrats Battled Trump and Moved Left. In Zelizer, Julian, ed. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 335–50. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kazin, Michael. 1998. The Populist Persuasion: An American History, revised ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kenney, Charles. 2004. Fujimori’s Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, Paul. Forthcoming. The Strategic Approach to Populism. In Subedi, Dambaru, Scott, Alan, et al. eds. Routledge Handbook of Populism in the Asia Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kenny, Paul. 2023. Why Populism: The Economics of Winning and Keeping Power from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, Paul. 2020. “The Enemy of the People:” Populists and Press Freedom. Political Research Quarterly 73:2 (June): 261–75.Google Scholar

Kenny, Paul. 2018. Populism in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, Paul. 2017. Populism and Patronage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, Paul, and Holmes, Ronald. 2020. A New Penal Populism? Rodrigo Duterte, Public Opinion, and the War on Drugs in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies 20:2 (July): 187–205.Google Scholar

Kestler, Thomas. 2022. Radical, Nativist, Authoritarian – Or All of These? Assessing Recent Cases of Right-Wing Populism in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America 14:3 (December): 289–310.Google Scholar

Khosla, Madhav, and Vaishnav, Milan. 2021. The Three Faces of the Indian State. Journal of Democracy 32:1 (January): 111–25.Google Scholar

Kimura, Kan. 2009. A Populist with Obsolete Ideas: The Failure of Roh Moo-hyun. In Mizuno, Kosuke and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds., Populism in Asia, 167–80. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar

King, Desmond, and Milkis, Sidney. 2022. Polarization, the Administrative State, and Executive-Centered Partisanship. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 267–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

(The) Kirchners v the Farmers. 2008. Economist (March 27).Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics. Comparative Political Studies 33:6–7 (August-September): 845–79.Google Scholar

Kitroeff, Natalie. 2023. At a Price, El Salvador Stamps Out Its Gangs. New York Times (10 April): A1, A10.Google Scholar

Klašnja, Marko, and Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2022. Anticorruption Efforts and Electoral Manipulation in Democracies. Journal of Politics 84:2 (April): 739–52.Google Scholar

Kline, Harvey. 2015. Fighting Monsters in the Abyss. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Kline, Harvey. 2009. Showing Teeth to the Dragons. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Körösényi, András, Illés, Gábor, and Gyulai, Attila. 2020. The Orbán Regime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Körösényi, András, and Patkós, Veronika. 2017. Liberal and Illiberal Populism: Berlusconi and Orbán. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 8 (special issue): 315–37.Google Scholar

Kostadinova, Petia, and Giurcanu, Magda. 2015. Political Blackmail, Institutional Infighting, and Electoral Politics: The Fate of Governing Parties during the Great Recession (2008–12) in Romania and Bulgaria. Politics and Policy 43:6 (December): 789–821.Google Scholar

Kostadinova, Tatiana, and Levitt, Barry. 2014. Toward a Theory of Personalist Parties. Politics and Policy 42:4 (August): 490–512.Google Scholar

Kotwas, Marta, and Kubik, Jan. 2019. Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 33:2 (May): 435–71.Google Scholar

Krastev, Ivan, and Holmes, Stephen. 2019. The Light that Failed: Why the West Is Losing the Fight for Democracy. New York: Pegasus.Google Scholar

Krasztev, Péter, and Van Til, Jon, eds. 2015. The Hungarian Patient. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Kreitner, Richard. 2020. What History Tells Us about Trump’s Implosion and Biden’s Opportunity: Interview with Stephen Skowronek. The Nation (October 12) <www.thenation.com/article/politics/interview-stephen-skowronek/, accessed 21 February 2022>..>Google Scholar

Krekó, Péter, and Enyedi, Zsolt. 2018. Orbán’s Laboratory of Illiberalism. Journal of Democracy 29:3 (July): 39–51.Google Scholar

Kriner, Douglas. 2022. Unilateralism Unleashed? Polarization and the Politics of Executive Action. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 118–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kuehn, David, and Trinkunas, Harold. 2017. Conditions of Military Contestation in Populist Latin America. Democratization 24:5 (October): 859–80.Google Scholar

Kulakevich, Tatsiana, and Augsburger, Aaron. 2021. Contested Elections, Protest, and Regime Stability: Comparing Belarus and Bolivia. Canadian Slavonic Papers 63:3–4 (December): 316–37.Google Scholar

Kyle, Jordan, and Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The Populist Harm to Democracy. Washington, DC: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.Google Scholar

Lamont, Michèle, Park, Bo, and Ayala-Hurtado, Elena. 2017. Trump’s Electoral Speeches and his Appeal to the American White Working Class. British Journal of Sociology 68:S1 (November): S153–80.Google Scholar

Lamounier, Bolivar. 1993. Institutional Structure and Governability in the 1990s. In D’Alva Kinzo, Maria, ed. Brazil: The Challenges of the 1990s, 117–37. London: University of London, Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar

Landau, David. 2018. Constitution-Making and Authoritarianism in Venezuela. In Graber, Mark, Levinson, Sanford, and Tushnet, Mark, eds. Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? 161–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Landeros, Edgar. 2021. El populismo de Nayib Bukele. In Gil Ortiz, Juliana, ed. Bicentenario de Centroamérica, 77–108. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2023. Populism, Democracy, and the Post-2020 Republican Party in Congress. Presidential Studies Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2022. Crosscutting Cleavages, Political Institutions, and Democratic Resilience in the United States. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 95–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2021. Challenges of Measuring Party Unity in a Polarized Era. In Patashnik, Eric and Schiller, Wendy, eds. Dynamics of American Democracy, 87–111. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2020. Populism and the American Party System. Perspectives on Politics 18:2 (June): 370–88.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2018. The 115th Congress and Questions of Party Unity in a Polarized Era. Journal of Politics 80:4 (October): 1464–73.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1997. The Czech and Slovak Republics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Legutko, Ryszard. 2018. The Demon in Democracy. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar

Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2020. Bolivia’s Citizen Revolt. Journal of Democracy 31:3 (July): 130–44.Google Scholar

Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2012. The Politics of Modern Central America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2008. Bolivia’s Constitutional Breakdown. Journal of Democracy 19:4 (October): 110–24.Google Scholar

Lendvai, Paul. 2017. Orbán: Europe’s New Strongman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven. 2011. Peru’s 2011 Elections. Journal of Democracy 22:4 (October): 84–94.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Cameron, Maxwell. 2003. Democracy without Parties? Latin American Politics and Society 45:3 (September): 1–33.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Loxton, James. 2019. Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in Latin America. In de la Torre, Carlos, ed. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, 334–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Loxton, James. 2013. Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization 20:1 (January): 107–36.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2020. La tentación militar en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 285 (January–February): 4–11.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2013. Lessons from Latin America: Building Institutions on Weak Foundations. Journal of Democracy 24:2 (April): 93–107.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2009. Variation in Institutional Strength. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 115–33.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2006. Building Castles in the Sand? The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Argentina. In Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria, eds. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, 21–44. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, Pepinsky, Thomas, Roberts, Kenneth, and Valelly, Richard. 2019. The Trump Presidency and American Democracy. Perspectives on Politics 17:2 (June): 470–79.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. 2022. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lim, Joseph. 2002. The Detrimental Role of Biased Policies. In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 113–47. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1:1 (Winter): 51–69.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan. 1978. Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan, and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Llach, Juan. 1997. Otro siglo, otra Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ariel.Google Scholar

Llanos, Mariana, and Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2010. Ruptura y continuidad: La caída de “Mel” Zelaya en perspectiva comparada. America Latina Hoy: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 55: 173–97.Google Scholar

López Bayona, Álvaro. 2016. El Uribismo y su carácter populista. Virajes: Revista de Sociología y Antropología 18:1 (January-June): 87–107.Google Scholar

López-Maya, Margarita. 2011. Venezuela: Hugo Chávez and the Populist Left. In Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, 213–38. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

López-Maya, Margarita. 2009. Venezuela: Ascenso y gobierno de Hugo Chávez y sus fuerzas bolivarianas. In Aibar, Julio and Vázquez, Daniel, eds. ¿Autoritarismo o democracia? Hugo Chávez y Evo Morales, 19–58. Tlalpan, Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar

López-Maya, Margarita, and Panzarelli, Alexandra. 2013. Populism, Rentierism, and Socialism in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of Venezuela. In de la Torre, Carlos and Arnson, Cynthia, eds. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century, 239–68. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Astrid. 2005. How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity. Journal of Theoretical Politics 17:3 (July): 339–61.Google Scholar

Los ultra K quieren reformar la Constitución para tener una “Cristina eterna.” 2011. Clarín (28 February).Google Scholar

Lowande, Kenneth, and Rogowski, Jon. 2021. Executive Power in Crisis. American Political Science Review 115:4 (November): 1406–23.Google Scholar

Lowndes, Joseph. 2022. The Political Creativity of the Populist Right. Paper for conference on “Still the Age of Populism?” University of Florida, April 22–23.Google Scholar

Lowndes, Joseph. 2017. Populism in the United States. In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 232–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lust, Jan. 2016. Social Struggle and the Political Economy of Natural Resource Extraction in Peru. Critical Sociology 42:2 (March): 195–210.Google Scholar

Lutz, Donald. 1994. Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment. American Political Science Review 88:2 (June): 355–70.Google Scholar

Madrid, Raúl. 2012. The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Madrid, Raúl, and Weyland, Kurt. 2019. Conclusion. In Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl, eds. When Democracy Trumps Populism, 154–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. Explaining Institutional Change, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. 2018. Party System Institutionalization in Contemporary Latin America. In Mainwaring, Scott, ed. Party Systems in Latin America, 34–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy. 1995. Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America. In Mainwaring, and Scully, , eds. Building Democratic Institutions, 1–34. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malzahn, Janet, and Hall, Andrew. 2023. Election-Denying Republican Candidates Underperformed in the 2022 Midterms. Ms. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Marona, Marjorie, and Magalhães, Lucas. 2021. Guerra e Paz? O Supremo Tribunal Federal nos dois primeiros anos do Governo Bolsonaro. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 121–33. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Marsteintredet, Leiv, Llanos, Mariana, and Nolte, Detlef. 2013. Paraguay and the Politics of Impeachment. Journal of Democracy 24:4 (October): 110–23.Google Scholar

Masek, Vaclav, and Aguasvivas, Luis. 2021. Consolidando el poder en El Salvador: El caso de Nayib Bukele. Ecuador Debate 112 (April): 157–73.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana, and Kalmoe, Nathan. 2022. The Social Roots, Risks, and Rewards of Mass Polarization. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 171–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana, Wronski, Julie, and Kane, John. 2021. Activating Animus: The Unique Social Roots of Trump Support. American Political Science Review 115:4 (November): 1508–16.Google Scholar

Mate, Manoj. 2018. Constitutional Erosion and the Challenge to Secular Democracy in India. In Graber, Mark, Levinson, Sanford, and Tushnet, Mark, eds. Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? 377–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matovski, Aleksandar. 2021. Popular Dictatorships: Crises, Mass Opinion, and the Rise of Electoral Authoritarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthes, Claudia. 2021. Safeguarding Democracy and the Rule of Law by Civil Society Actors? The Case of Poland. In Lorenz, Astrid and Anders, Lisa, eds. Illiberal Trends and Anti-EU Politics in East Central Europe, 263–80. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mauceri, Philip. 2006. An Authoritarian Presidency. In Carrión, Julio, ed. The Fujimori Legacy, 39–60. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Mauceri, Philip. 1995. State Reform, Coalitions, and the Neoliberal Autogolpe in Peru. Latin American Research Review 30:1: 7–37.Google Scholar

Mauceri, Philip. 1991. Military Politics and Counter-Insurgency in Peru. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 33:4 (Winter): 83–109.Google Scholar

Mayka, Lindsay. 2016. Delegative Democracy Revisited. Journal of Democracy 27:3 (July): 139–47.Google Scholar

Mayorga, Fernando. 2009. El proyecto político del MAS. In Aibar, Julio and Vázquez, Daniel, eds. “Autoritarismo o democracia” Hugo Chávez y Evo Morales, 171–218. Tlalpan, Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar

Mayorga, René. 1997. Bolivia’s Silent Revolution. Journal of Democracy 8:1 (January): 142–56.Google Scholar

Mazzolini, Samuele, and Borriello, Arthur. 2022. The Normalization of Left Populism? The Paradigmatic Case of Podemos. European Politics and Society 23:3 (May): 285–300.Google Scholar

McAdams, James. 2017. Vanguard of the Revolution: The Global Idea of the Communist Party. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCargo, Duncan, and Pathmanand, Ukrist. (2005) 2010. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan. 2021. Polarization and the Changing American Constitutional System. In Patashnik, Eric and Schiller, Wendy, eds. Dynamics of American Democracy, 112–38. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

McCauley, Clark. 2021. Putting the Capitol Breach in Context. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 14:2 (June): 94–109.Google Scholar

McClintock, Cynthia. 2013. Populism in Peru. In de la Torre, Carlos and Arnson, Cynthia, eds. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century, 203–37. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

McClintock, Cynthia. 1989. The Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in a “Least Likely” Case: Peru. Comparative Politics 21:2 (January): 127–48.Google Scholar

McCoy, Jennifer, and Somer, Murat. 2022. Pernicious Polarization and Democratic Resilience. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 61–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCoy, Jennifer, and Somer, Murat. 2019. Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science 681 (January): 234–71.Google Scholar

McDermott, Rose. 2004. Political Psychology in International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

McDonnell, Duncan, and Cabrera, Luis. 2019. The Right-Wing Populism of India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (and Why Comparativists Should Care). Democratization 26:3 (April): 484–501.Google Scholar

McGuire, James. 1997. Peronism without Perón. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

McKay, Ben, and Colque, Gonzalo. 2021. Populism and Its Authoritarian Tendencies: The Politics of Division in Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives, forthcoming.Google Scholar

McNelly, Angus. 2021. The Uncertain Future of Bolivia’s Movement toward Socialism. New Labor Forum 30:2 (May): 81–89.Google Scholar

Mebane, Walter. 2019. Evidence against Fraudulent Votes Being Decisive in the Bolivia 2019 Election. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar

Mehlum, Halvor, Moene, Karl, and Torvik, Ragnar. 2006. Institutions and the Resource Curse. Economic Journal 116:508 (January): 1–20.Google Scholar

Mejía Acosta, Andrés, Araujo, María, Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and Saiegh, Sebastián. 2008. Veto Players, Fickle Institutions, and Low-Quality Policies: The Policymaking Process in Ecuador. In Stein, Eduardo and Tommasi, Mariano, eds. Policymaking in Latin America, 243–85. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Mejía Acosta, Andrés, and Polga-Hecimovich, John. 2011. Coalition Erosion and Presidential Instability in Ecuador. Latin American Politics and Society 53:2 (Summer): 87–111.Google Scholar

Meléndez-Sánchez, Manuel. 2021a. Millennial Authoritarianism in El Salvador. Journal of Democracy 32:3 (July): 19–32.Google Scholar

Meléndez-Sánchez, Manuel. 2021b. Political Institutions in El Salvador, 2014-Present. Harvard University, Department of Government.Google Scholar

Meléndez-Sánchez, Manuel, and Levitsky, Steven. 2021. El Salvador’s President Launched a “Self-Coup.” Washington Post (20 May). <www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/20/el-salvadors-president-launched-self-coup-watch-creeping-corruption-authoritarianism/, accessed 23 June 2022>..>Google Scholar

Melo, Carlos. 2021. A Câmara dos Deputados pós-2018. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 95–109. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Méndez Ortiz, Heinz. 2017. La presidencia de Abdalá Bucaram y su incidencia en la inestabilidad política del Ecuador. Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador. Tesis de Licenciatura en Ciencias de la Educación.Google Scholar

Meneguello, Rachel. 2021. Opinião pública em um governo de risco e contrassenso. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 495–506. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Mesežnikov, Grigorij, and Gyárfášová, Ol’ga. 2018. Slovakia’s Conflicting Camps. Journal of Democracy 29:3 (July): 78–90.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Lee. 1998. The Evolution of Presidential Power in Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies 29:4 (Winter): 333–52.Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne, and Lieberman, Robert. 2020. Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar

Metz, Rudolf, and Várnagy, Réka. 2021. “Mass,” “Movement,” “Personal,” or “Cartel” Party? Fidesz’s Hybrid Organisational Strategy. Politics and Governance 9:4 (December): 317–28.Google Scholar

Mexico: Power Struggles in Judiciary. 2021. Latin American Weekly Report WR-21-32 (12 August): 11–12.Google Scholar

Mexico Election Outcome Forces Recall Referendum Rethink – Analyst. 2021. BNAmericas (9 June) <www.bnamericas.com/en/news/mexico-election-outcome-forces-recall-referendum-rethink--analyst, accessed 29 October 2021>..>Google Scholar

Mexico’s Populist President: The Puritan from Tepetitán. 2021. Economist (29 May): 18–20.Google Scholar

Meyer, Brett. 2021. A Playbook against Populism? Populist Leadership in Decline in 2021. Washington, DC: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.Google Scholar

Meyer, David, and Tarrow, Sidney, eds. 2018. The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Gary, and Schofield, Norman. 2008. The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S. Perspectives on Politics 6:3 (September): 433–50.Google Scholar

Miller, Gary, and Schofield, Norman. 2003. Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review 97:2 (May): 245–60.Google Scholar

Miranda, Danilo. 2021. Nayib Bukele: “El Estado soy yo”. Envío 40:468 (March): 1–11.Google Scholar

Mitra, Subrata. 2020. For India, “Middle” Democracy Works. Global Asia 15:1 (March): 36–41.Google Scholar

Mizuno, Kosuke, and Phongpaichit, Pasuk. 2009. Introduction. In Mizuno, Kosuke and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds., Populism in Asia, 1–17. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar

Moallic, Benjamin. 2022. État d’exception: Que se passe-t-il au Salvador? Amérique Latine 1:1 (November): 143–57.Google Scholar

Moallic, Benjamin. 2020. El Salvador: La Révolution Introuvable. Problèmes d’Amérique Latine 116:1 (January): 103–25.Google Scholar

Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Montúfar, César. 2013. Rafael Correa and his Plebiscitary Citizens’ Revolution. In de la Torre, Carlos and Arnson, Cynthia, eds. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century, 295–321. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Montúfar, César. 2006. Lucio Gutiérrez y el fracaso de un proyecto autoritario. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.Google Scholar

Montúfar, César. 1997. Las contradicciones de la convertibilidad. Íconos 1 (February): 20–32.Google Scholar

Mora y Araujo, Manuel. 2011. La Argentina bipolar: Los vaivenes de la opinión pública (1983–2011). Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar

Morales Solá, Joaquín. 2007. La decision se tomó: Cristina Kirchner será la candidata. La Nación (9 May).Google Scholar

Morgan, Jana. 2018. Deterioration and Polarization of Party Politics in Venezuela. In Mainwaring, Scott, ed. Party Systems in Latin America, 291–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mouzelis, Nicos. 1985. On the Concept of Populism. Politics & Society 14:3 (September): 329–48.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. 2017. Populism: An Ideational Approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. 2017. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 27–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2013. Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48:2 (April): 147–74.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2018. Romania’s Italian-Style Anticorruption Populism. Journal of Democracy 29:3 (July): 104–16.Google Scholar

Muñoz, Paula. 2021. Peru Goes Populist. Journal of Democracy 32:3 (July): 48–62.Google Scholar

Muñoz, Paula, and Guibert, Yamilé. 2016. Perú: El fin del optimismo. Revista de Ciencia Política 36:1 (April): 313–38.Google Scholar

Murakami, Yusuke. 2012. Perú en la era del Chino, 2nd ed. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Murillo, María Victoria, and Zarazaga, Rodrigo. 2020. Argentina: Peronism Returns. Journal of Democracy 31:2 (April): 125–36.Google Scholar

Murillo Ramírez, Óscar. 2012. “Oro y agua:” Dilemas y giros políticos de Ollanta Humala. Nueva Sociedad 240 (July–August): 4–15.Google Scholar

Murphy, Matt. 2022. Janez Jansa: Slovenia Votes Out Pro-Trump Populist. BBC News (25 April).Google Scholar

Navarrete Vela, Juan Pablo, Camacho Sánchez, Omar, and Ceja García, Manuel. 2017. Formación, liderazgo y desempeño electoral de MORENA. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Electorales 18 (July–December): 11–60.Google Scholar

Nayib Bukele consolida su poder con una victoria sin precedentes en El Salvador. 2021. El País (1 March).Google Scholar

Negretto, Gabriel. 2013. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Michael. 2018. Trump’s First Year. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Nemčok, Miroslav, and Spáč, Peter. 2020. The Rise and Sustainability of Party Leaders in Slovakia: Robert Fico and Mikuláš Dzurinda. In Gherghina, Sergiu, ed. Party Leaders in Eastern Europe, 241–64. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nesbet-Montesinos, Felipe. 2011. Humala antes de Ollanta: Evolución política del nuevo presidente peruano. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 91 (October): 81–90.Google Scholar

Neundorf, Anja, and Pardos-Prado, Sergi. 2022. The Impact of COVID-19 on Trump’s Electoral Demise. Perspectives on Politics 20:1 (March): 170–86.Google Scholar

Neuwahl, Nanette, and Kovcs, Charles. 2021. Hungary and the EU’s Rule of Law Protection. Journal of European Integration 43:1 (January): 17–32.Google Scholar

Newell, James. 2019. Silvio Berlusconi: A Study in Failure. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Newman, John. 2020. The OAS Conclusions about the Election Integrity of the Bolivian Election are Correct. Annapolis, MD: Kenact LLC.Google Scholar

Nič, Milan. 2020. Slovakia’s 2020 Elections. DGAP Commentary 6 (February). Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik.Google Scholar

Nicas, Jack. 2023. Is Brazil’s Ombudsman of Democracy Actually Good for Democracy? New York Times (January 22): 7.Google Scholar

Nilsson, Martin. 2022. Nayib Bukele: Populism and Autocratization? Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 12:2 (June): 16–26.Google Scholar

Nooruddin, Irfan. 2020. Comment on the 2019 Bolivia Presidential Election and OAS Statistical Analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, School of Foreign Service.Google Scholar

Novaro, Marcos. 2009. Argentina en el fin del siglo: Democracia, mercado y nación. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar

Novaro, Marcos. 1998. Populismo y gobierno: Las transformaciones en el Peronismo y la consolidación democrática en Argentina. In Burbano de Lara, Felipe, ed. El fantasma del populismo, 25–48. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar

OAS (Organization of American States). 2019a. Electoral Integrity Analysis: General Elections in the Plurinational State of Bolivia, October 20, 2019. Final Report. Washington, DC: OAS.Google Scholar

OAS (Organization of American States). 2019b. Electoral Integrity Analysis: General Elections in the Plurinational State of Bolivia, October 20, 2019. Preliminary Findings: Report to the General Secretariat. Washington, DC: OAS.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe. 1986. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Öniş, Ziya. 2016. Turkey’s Two Elections. Journal of Democracy 27:2 (April): 141–54.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe. 2015. Monopolising the Centre: The AKP and the Uncertain Path of Turkish Democracy. International Spectator 50:2 (June): 22–41.Google Scholar

Özel, Soli. 2003. Turkey at the Polls. Journal of Democracy 14:2 (April): 80–94.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. 1991. Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe. Social Research 58:4 (Winter): 865–92.Google Scholar

Oliver, Eric, and Rahn, Wendy. 2016. Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science 667 (September): 189–206.Google Scholar

Ollier, María. 2015. El ciclo de las presidencias dominantes: Néstor y Cristina Kirchner (2003–2013). In Gervasoni, Carlos and Peruzzotti, Enrique, eds. “Década Ganada” Evaluando el legado del Kirchnerismo, 61–87. Buenos Aires: Debate.Google Scholar

Olsen, Orjan. 2022. Tendência dos Votos para Presidente no Brasil desde 1998. Ms. São Paulo: Analítica Consultoria (November).Google Scholar

Ortuño Yáñez, Armando. 2020. Movilizados, satisfechos e indiferentes: Maneras de vivir la crisis. In Mayorga, Fernando, ed. Crisis y cambio político en Bolivia, 61–77. La Paz: CESU-UMSS (Centro de Estudios Superiores Universitarios de la Universidad Mayor de San Simón).Google Scholar

Osorio, María. 2012. Primer mandato presidencial de Uribe Vélez. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.Google Scholar

Ospina Peralta, Pablo. 2021. The Right Turn as a Process, not an Assault: The Ecuadorian Case, 2007–2019. In Pereyra Doval, Gisela and Souroujon, Gastón, eds. Global Resurgence of the Right, 235–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ostiguy, Pierre. 2017. Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 73–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ostiguy, Pierre, and Roberts, Kenneth. 2016. Putting Trump in Comparative Perspective: Populism and the Politicization of the Sociocultural Low. Brown Journal of World Affairs 23:1 (Fall–Winter): 25–50.Google Scholar

Otake, Hideo. 2009. Neoliberal Populism in Japanese Politics. In Mizuno, Kosuke and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds., Populism in Asia, 202–16. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar

Pachano, Simón. 2005. Ecuador: Cuando la inestabilidad se yuelve estable. Íconos 23 (September): 39–46.Google Scholar

Pachano, Simón. 1997. Democracia a la medida. Íconos 1 (February): 7–13.Google Scholar

Pakulski, Jan. 2016. Crumbling Elite Consensus and the Illiberal Turn in Poland. In Pakulski, Jan, ed. The Visegrad Countries in Crisis, 51–86. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.Google Scholar

Palabrica, Raul. 2002. The Road to Impeachment and Ouster Was Short and Bumpy. In Doronila, Amando, ed. Between Fires: Fifteen Perspectives on the Estrada Crisis, 227–35. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar

Palata, Luboš. 2023. Tschechische Präsidentschaftswahl: Aufwind für den “tschechischen Orban”? Deutsche Welle (10 January).Google Scholar

Paldam, Martin. 2021. Measuring Democracy – Eight Indices. Aarhus: Aarhus University, Department of Economics. Working Paper 2021–10.Google Scholar

Palermo, Vicente, and Novaro, Marcos. 1996. Política y poder en la Argentina de Menem. Buenos Aires: Norma.Google Scholar

Panetta, Grace. 2021. Defending Democracy during a Pandemic. In Sabato, Larry, Kondik, Kyle, and Coleman, Miles, eds. A Return to Normalcy? The 2020 Elections that (Almost) Broke America, 185–202. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Pappas, Takis. 2020. The Pushback Against Populism: The Rise and Fall of Greece’s New Illiberalism. Journal of Democracy 31:2 (April): 54–68.Google Scholar

Pappas, Takis. 2019. Populism and Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parker, Christopher, and Barreto, Matt. 2022. The Great White Hope: Threat and Racial Resilience in Trump’s America. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 195–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parton, Heather. 2022. GOP Leaders: Trapped between “Legitimate Political Discourse” and the Trumpian Abyss. Salon (February 9). <www.salon.com/2022/02/09/leaders-trapped-between-legitimate-political-discourse-and-the-trumpian-abyss/, accessed 9 February 2022>..>Google Scholar

Pasquino, Gianfranco. 2021. The Right in Italy. In Pereyra Doval, Gisela and Souroujon, Gastón, eds. Global Resurgence of the Right, 161–72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pasquino, Gianfranco. 2007. The Five Faces of Silvio Berlusconi. Modern Italy 12:1 (February): 39–54.Google Scholar

Paul, Max. 2022. Who Desires Authoritarian Leadership in the Latin America and Caribbean Region? Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. LAPOP. Insights Series # 155 (November).Google Scholar

Peabody, Bruce. 2018. The Curious Incident of Trump and the Courts. British Journal of American Legal Studies 7:2 (Fall): 237–56.Google Scholar

Pearson, Andy, Prado, Andrea, and Colburn, Forrest. 2021. The Puzzle of COVID-19 in Central America and Panama. Journal of Global Health 11:03077 (June): 1–7.Google Scholar

Pécaut, Daniel. 2003. Midiendo fuerzas: Balance del primer año del gobierno de Álvaro Uribe Vélez. Bogotá: Planeta.Google Scholar

Pehe, Jiri. 1991. Political Conflict in Slovakia. Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty – Report on Eastern Europe 10 (10 May): 1–6.Google Scholar

Pelke, Lars, and Croissant, Aurel. 2021. Conceptualizing and Measuring Autocratization Episodes. Swiss Political Science Review 27:2 (June): 434–48.Google Scholar

Penski, Victoria. 2018. Why Are Violent Non-State Actors Able to Persist in the Context of the Modern State? The Case of the Maras in the Northern Triangle. Journal of Intelligence, Conflict and Warfare 1:1 (June): 1–23.Google Scholar

Perelló, Lucas, and Navia, Patricio. 2022. The Disruption of an Institutionalised and Polarised Party System: Discontent with Democracy and the Rise of Nayib Bukele in El Salvador. Politics 42:3 (August): 267–88.Google Scholar

Pereyra Doval, Gisela. 2021. Bolsonaro in Brazil. In Pereyra Doval, Gisela and Souroujon, Gastón, eds. Global Resurgence of the Right, 214–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peru: A Country Tearing Itself Apart. 2023. Economist (4 February): 27–28.Google Scholar

Peru: Jobs for the Comrades. 2021. Economist (23 October): 34–35.Google Scholar

Petersen, German, and Somuano, Fernanda. 2021. Mexican De-Democratization? Revista de Ciencia Política 41:2 (August): 353–76.Google Scholar

Petőcz, György. 2015. Milla: A Suspended Experiment. In Krasztev, Péter and Van Til, Jon, eds. The Hungarian Patient, 207–29. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Petrović, Miloš, and Jeremić, Zlatan. 2021. Damaging Effects of Vaccine Geopolitics and the EU’s Distorted Soft Power. Medjunarodni problemi 73:4 (December): 709–35.Google Scholar

Petrović, Valentina. 2020. Threats to Democracy: Measures Taken by Right–Wing Populist Regimes during the Covid-19 Crisis in Eastern Europe. Politicˇke Perspektive 10:2–3: 51–67.Google Scholar

Philips, David. 2017. An Uncertain Ally: Turkey under Erdogan’s Dictatorship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Baker, Chris. 2009. Thaksin, 2nd ed. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar

Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Baker, Chris. 2008. Thaksin’s Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38:1 (February): 62–83.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2017. American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy. British Journal of Sociology 68:S1 (November): S105–19.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94:2 (June): 251–67.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul, and Schickler, Eric. 2022. Polarization and the Durability of Madisonian Checks and Balances. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 35–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul, and Schickler, Eric. 2020. Madison’s Constitution Under Stress: A Developmental Approach to Political Polarization. Annual Review of Political Science 23: 37–58.Google Scholar

Pion-Berlin, David, Bruneau, Thomas, and Goetze Jr, Richard. 2022. The Trump Self-Coup Attempt. Government and Opposition, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Pirro, Andrea, and Stanley, Ben. 2022. Forging, Bending, and Breaking: Enacting the “Illiberal Playbook” in Hungary and Poland. Perspectives on Politics 20:1 (March): 86–101.Google Scholar

PNP (Partido Nacionalista Peruano). 2011. Propuesta Nacionalista: “Afirmar la Nación, Transformar el Estado.” Lima: PNP.Google Scholar

Polga-Hecimovich, John. 2020. Ecuadorian Military Culture 2019. Miami: Florida International University, Steven J. Green School of International & Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Polga-Hecimovich, John. 2013. Ecuador: Estabilidad institucional y la consolidación de poder de Rafael Correa. Revista de Ciencia Política 33:1 (April): 135–60.Google Scholar

Polga-Hecimovich, John, and Sánchez, Francisco. 2021. Ecuador’s Return to the Past. Journal of Democracy 32:3 (July): 5–18.Google Scholar

Pongsudhirak, Thitinan. 2003. Democratic Authoritarianism. Southeast Asian Affairs 6:1: 277–290.Google Scholar

Prasirtsuk, Kitti. 2015. Thailand in 2014: Another Coup, a Different Coup? Asian Survey 55:1 (January-February): 200–06.Google Scholar

Protests in Hungary. 2019. Economist (22 November): 46–47.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 2019. Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. (1970) 1982. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar

Putnam, Lara, and Skocpol, Theda. 2018. Middle America Reboots Democracy. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas (20 February). <https://democracyjournal.org/arguments/middle-america-reboots-democracy/>>Google Scholar

Pytlas, Bartek. 2021. Party Organisation of PiS in Poland. Politics and Governance 9:4 (November): 340–53.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ranis, Peter. 1995. Class, Democracy, and Labor in Argentina. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

Rathbone, John. 2011. Mood of Cautious Optimism Takes Hold. Financial Times, Special Report: Investing in Peru (September 21): 1.Google Scholar

Razing Arizona. 2021. Economist (July 3): 29–34.Google Scholar

Reading into Mexico’s Recall Result. 2022. Latin American Weekly Report WR-22–15 (14 April): 1–3.Google Scholar

Rebossio, Alejandro. 2010. Kirchner toma con la policía el control del Banco Central. El País (January 26) <https://elpais.com/diario/2010/01/26/economia/1264460408_850215.html, accessed 28 February 2022>..>Google Scholar

Reyna, José, and Weinert, Richard, eds. 1977. Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar

Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Madrid, Raúl L. 2020. The Perils of Personalism. Democratization 27:2 (February): 321–39.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, Guilherme. 2020. A ilusão de Paschoal ou: Cinco efeitos negativos do impeachment de Jair Bolsonaro para a esquerda e para a democracia no Brasil. Espaço e Economia 9:18 (May): 1–13.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, Ludmila, and Oliveira, Valeria. 2021. “Eu quero que o povo se arme:” A política de segurança pública de Bolsonaro. In Avritzer, Leonardo, Kerche, Fábio, and Marona, Marjorie, eds. Governo Bolsonaro, 327–41. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar

Riegert, Bernd. 2022. Die EU hält zwölf Milliarden im Streit mit Ungarn zurück. Deutsche Welle (13 December).Google Scholar

Rivas Molina, Federico. 2023. Javier Milei, el candidato libertario que capitaliza el descontento en Argentina. El País (20 March).Google Scholar

Rivera León, Mauro. 2017. Understanding Constitutional Amendments in Mexico. Mexican Law Review 9:2 (January–June): 3–27.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 2022. Performing Crisis? Trump, Populism and the GOP in the Age of COVID-19. Government and Opposition, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 2019. Parties, Populism, and Democratic Decay: A Comparative Perspective on Political Polarization in the United States. In Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl, eds. When Democracy Trumps Populism, 132–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 2014. Changing Course in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 2006. Populism, Political Conflict, and Grass-Roots Organization in Latin America. Comparative Politics 38:2 (January): 127–48.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 1995. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case. World Politics 48:1 (October): 82–116.Google Scholar

Rocamora, Joel. 2009. Estrada and the Populist Temptation in the Philippines. In Mizuno, Kosuke and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds., Populism in Asia, 41–65. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar

Rocco, Philip. 2022. Laboratories of What? American Federalism and the Politics of Democratic Subversion. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 297–319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, Francisco. 2008. An Empty Revolution: The Unfulfilled Promises of Hugo Chávez. Foreign Affairs 87:2 (March–April): 49–62.Google Scholar

Rojas Ortuste, Gonzalo. 2009. Trayectoria del proceso político boliviano. In Aibar, Julio and Vázquez, Daniel, eds. “Autoritarismo o democracia” Hugo Chávez y Evo Morales, 219–55. Tlalpan, Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar

Roque Baldovinos, Ricardo. 2021. Nayib Bukele: Populismo e implosión democrática en El Salvador. Andamios: Revista de Investigación Social 18:46 (May–August): 231–53.Google Scholar

Rori, Lamprini. 2020. The 2019 Greek Parliamentary Election. West European Politics 43:4 (June): 1023–37.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2020. Le Siècle du Populisme. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Rosen, Jonathan. 2021. Understanding Support for Tough-on-Crime Policies in Latin America. Latin American Policy 12: 116–31.Google Scholar

Rosen, Jonathan, Cutrona, Sebastián, and Lindquist, Katy. 2022. Gangs, Violence, and Fear: Punitive Darwinism in El Salvador. Crime, Law and Social Change, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Gavriel. 2019. An American Führer? Central European History 52:4 (December): 554–87.Google Scholar

Rospigliosi, Fernando. 1992. Las elecciones peruanas de 1990. In Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos (IIDH), ed. Una tarea inconclusa, 345–88. San José, Costa Rica: IIDH.Google Scholar

Ross, Michael. 2015. What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse? Annual Review of Political Science 18: 239–259.Google Scholar

Ross, Michael. 2012. The Oil Curse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rossi, Michael. 2020. Slovakia after Fico. Politologický Cˇasopis – Czech Journal of Political Science 27:3 (October): 235–58.Google Scholar

Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2019. Dealing with Populism in Latin America. In Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl, eds. When Democracy Trumps Populism: European and Latin American Lessons for the U.S., 35–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. 2017. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rowland, Robert. 2021. The Rhetoric of Donald Trump. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Ruhl, Mark. 2010. Honduras Unravels. Journal of Democracy 21:2 (April): 93–107.Google Scholar

Rule of Law in Poland: Judgment Call. 2023. Economist (18 February): 48–49.Google Scholar

Ruth, Saskia, and Hawkins, Kirk. 2017. Populism and Democratic Representation in Latin America. In Heinisch, Reinhard, Holtz-Bacha, Christina, and Mazzoleni, Oscar, eds. Political Populism: A Handbook, 255–73. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Ruth-Lovell, Saskia, Lührmann, Anna, and Grahn, Sandra. 2019. Democracy and Populism. Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute. Working paper 2019:91.Google Scholar

Rutledge, Paul, and Rackaway, Chapman. 2021. Conclusion: The Unorthodox Presidency. In Rutledge, Paul and Rackaway, Chapman, eds. The Unorthodox Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 365–83. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Rybář, Marek, and Spáč, Peter. 2017. The March 2016 Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia. Electoral Studies 45 (February): 153–56.Google Scholar

Sabino, Fernando. 1991. Zélia, uma Paixão. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey. 1989. Social Conflict and Populist Policies in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech. 2023. A Pandemic of Populists. Webinar, University of Texas at Austin, Polish Club (1 April).Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech. 2022. A Pandemic of Populists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech. 2019. Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech. 2018. How Democracy Dies (in Poland). Revista Forumul Judeca˘torilor 10:1 (First Semester): 104–78.Google Scholar

Saldin, Robert, and Teles, Steven. 2020. Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Sibony, Omar. 2021. Competitive Authoritarianism in Morales’s Bolivia. Latin American Politics and Society 63:1 (February): 118–44.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Sibony, Omar. 2018. Competitive Authoritarianism in Ecuador under Correa. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 14:2 (December): 97–120.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Sibony, Omar. 2017. Classifying Ecuador’s Regime Under Correa. Journal of Politics in Latin America 9:3 (December): 121–40.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Talanquer, Mariano, and Greene, Kenneth. 2021. Is Mexico Falling into the Authoritarian Trap? Journal of Democracy 32:4 (October): 56–71.Google Scholar

Santander, Carlos. 2021. Pedro Castillo se aleja de los radicales. Página Siete (24 October).Google Scholar

Santoro, Daniel. 1994. El hacedor: Una biografía política de Domingo Cavallo. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar

Sato, Yuko, and Arce, Moisés. 2022. Resistance to Populism. Democratization 29:6 (August): 1137–56.Google Scholar

Savage, Ritchie. 2019. Populism in the U.S. In de la Torre, Carlos, ed. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, 402–15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schady, Norbert. 2000. The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991–1995. American Political Science Review 94:2 (June): 289–304.Google Scholar

Schamis, Hector. 2013. From the Peróns to the Kirchners. In de la Torre, Carlos and Arnson, Cynthia, eds. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century, 145–78. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim. 2022. How Viktor Orbán Wins. Journal of Democracy 33:3 (July): 45–61.Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim. 2018. Autocratic Legalism. University of Chicago Law Review 85:2 (March): 545–83.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Gregory. 1998. Presidential Usurpation or Congressional Preference? In Carey, John and Shugart, Matthew, eds. Executive Decree Authority, 104–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Gregory. 1996. Fujimori’s 1990 Upset Victory in Peru. Comparative Politics 28:3 (April): 321–54.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe. 1983. Democratic Theory and Neocorporatist Practice. Social Research 50:4 (Winter): 885–928.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe, and Karl, Terry. 1991. What Democracy Is… and Is Not. Journal of Democracy 2:3 (July): 75–88.Google Scholar

Schneider, Ben. 1991. Brazil under Collor. World Policy Journal 8:2 (Spring): 321–47.Google Scholar

Serra, Gilles. 2018. The Electoral Strategies of a Populist Candidate: Does Charisma Discourage Experience and Encourage Extremism? Journal of Theoretical Politics 30:1 (January): 45–73.Google Scholar

Serrano Mancilla, Alfredo. 2021. Evo: Operación Rescate. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar

Shin, Michael, and Agnew, John. 2008. Berlusconi’s Italy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Sides, John, Tausanovitch, Chris, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2022. The Bitter End: The 2020 Presidential Campaign and the Challenge to American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2018. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Signs of Less Trumpy Times: Voters’ Allegiance. 2022. Economist (February 12): 22.Google Scholar

Siles, Ignacio, Guevara, Erica, et al. 2023. Populism, Religion, and Social Media in Central America. International Journal of Press/Politics 28:1 (January): 138–59.Google Scholar

Silva, Cláudio Humberto Rosa e. 1993. Mil Dias de Solidão: Collor Bateu e Levou. São Paulo: Geração.Google Scholar

Silva-Herzog Márquez, Jesús. 2020. La casa de la contradicción. Mexico City: Taurus.Google Scholar

Sin maras y sin democracia. 2023. El Faro (3 February).Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda, Tervo, Caroline, and Walters, Kirsten. 2022. Citizen Organizing and Party Polarization from the Tea Party to the Anti-Trump Resistance. In Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? 369–400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen. 2020. Presidential Leadership in Political Time, 3rd ed., revised and expanded. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen, Dearborn, John A., and King, Desmond. 2021. Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen, and Orren, Karen. 2020. The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First Century America. Perspectives on Politics 18:2 (June): 354–69.Google Scholar

Slowakei: Ungewöhnlicher Rücktritt des Ministerpräsidenten. 2021. Deutsche Welle (March 29).Google Scholar

Smith, Jason. 2022. The Rhetoric and Reality of Infrastructure during the Trump Presidency. In Zelizer, Julian, ed. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 162–80. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Laura. 2021. Trump and Congress. Policy Studies 42: 5–6 (September): 528–43.Google Scholar

Smith, William. 1991. State, Market, and Neoliberalism in Post-Transition Argentina. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 33:4 (Winter): 45–82.Google Scholar

Smolecová, Alexandra, and Šárovec, Daniel. 2021. Heading Towards Collapse? Assessment of the Slovak Party System after the 2020 General Elections. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 21:1 (January): 27–50.Google Scholar

Snyder, Timothy. 2017. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Somer, Murat. 2019. Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science 681 (January): 42–61.Google Scholar

Souroujon, Gastón, and Lesgart, Cecilia. 2021. Populism: Uses, Abuses, and Travels of an Uncomfortable Concept. In Pereyra Doval, Gisela and Souroujon, Gastón, eds. Global Resurgence of the Right, 54–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Spirova, Maria, and Sharenkova-Toshkova, Radostina. 2021. Juggling Friends and Foes: Prime Minister Borissov’s Surprise Survival in Bulgaria. East European Politics 37:3 (September): 432–47.Google Scholar

Staniszkis, Jadwiga. 1984. Poland’s Self-Limiting Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, Ben. 2020. A Comparison of Two Polish Party Leaders: Jarosław Kaczyński and Donald Tusk. In Gherghina, Sergiu, ed. Party Leaders in Eastern Europe, 171–95. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stanley, Ben. 2017. Populism in Central and Eastern Europe. In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 140–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, Ben. 2016. Confrontation by Default and Confrontation by Design: Strategic and Institutional Responses to Poland’s Populist Coalition Government. Democratization 23:2 (March): 263–82.Google Scholar

Stanley, Ben, and Cześnik, Mikołaj. 2019. Populism in Poland. In Stockemer, Daniel, ed. Populism around the World, 67–87. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.Google Scholar

Stanley, Jason. 2018. How Fascism Works. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Ştefan, Laurenţiu. 2021. Puppets of the President? Prime Ministers in Post-Communist Romania. East European Politics 37:3 (September): 481–95.Google Scholar

Stefanoni, Pablo, and Alto, Hervé do. 2006. Evo Morales, de la coca al Palacio. La Paz: Malatesta.Google Scholar

Stelmach, Michał. 2021. Public Security Policy in El Salvador during the Presidency of Nayib Bukele (2017–2019). Anuario Latinoamericano de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales 12: 65–85.Google Scholar

Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 2022. The Rule of Law vs. “Party Nature:” Presidential Elections, the U.S. Constitution, the Electoral Count Act of 1887, the Horror of January 6, and the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022. Boston University Law Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass, ed. 2018. Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America. New York: Dey St.Google Scholar

Svolik, Milan. 2019. Polarization versus Democracy. Journal of Democracy 30:3 (July): 20–32.Google Scholar

Svolik, Milan. 2015. Which Democracies Will Last? British Journal of Political Science 45(4): 715–38.Google Scholar

Svolik, Milan. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sydorchuk, Oleksii. 2014. The Impact of Semi-Presidentialism on Democratic Consolidation in Poland and Ukraine. Demokratizatsiya 22:1(Winter): 117–44.Google Scholar

Szomolányi, Soňa. 2016. Slovakia’s Elite. In Pakulski, Jan, ed. The Visegrad Countries in Crisis, 67–86. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.Google Scholar

Taggart, Paul, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2016. Dealing with Populists in Government: Conclusions. Democratization 23:2 (June): 304–23.Google Scholar

Tamada, Yoshifumi. 2009. Democracy and Populism in Thailand. In Mizuno, Kosuke and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds., Populism in Asia, 94–111. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Martín. 2011. Peru’s 2011 Elections. Journal of Democracy 22:4 (October): 75–83.Google Scholar

Teehankee, Julio. 2022. The Philippines in 2021: Twilight of the Duterte Presidency. Asian Survey 62:1 (January–February): 126–36.Google Scholar

Teichman, Judith. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Teichman, Judith. 1997. Mexico and Argentina: Economic Reform and Technocratic Decision Making. Studies in Comparative International Development 32:1 (Spring): 31–55.Google Scholar

Thaler, Richard. 1992. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Theuns, Tom. 2022. The Need for an EU Expulsion Mechanism. Res Publica, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Thomas, George. 2016. Madison and the Perils of Populism. National Review 29 (Fall): 142–56.Google Scholar

Thompson, Mark. 2022. Duterte’s Violent Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 52:3 (May): 403–28.Google Scholar

Tinted Glasses: Presidential Approval. 2019. Economist (May 25): 28.Google Scholar

Tismaneanu, Vladimir. 2013. Democracy on the Brink: A Coup Attempt Fails in Romania. World Affairs 175:5 (January): 83–87.Google Scholar

Tobar, Mónica. 2020. Gobernabilidad en tiempos de crisis: La relación entre el Ejecutivo y el Legislativo en la gestión del presidente Nayib Bukele en El Salvador. Reflexión Política 22:45 (August): 70–78.Google Scholar

Topcu, Elmas. 2022. Ekrem Imamoglu: Was steckt hinter dem Politikverbot für Istanbuls Bürgermeister? Deutsche Welle (15 December).Google Scholar

Torres y Torres Lara, Carlos. 1992. Los nudos del poder. Lima: Desarrollo y Paz.Google Scholar

Treerat, Nualnoi. 2009. Thaksin Shinawatra and Mass Media. In Mizuno, Kosuke and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, eds., Populism in Asia, 112–26. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar

Treisman, Daniel. 2020. Democracy by Mistake. American Political Science Review 114:3 (August): 792–810.Google Scholar

Trejo, Guillermo, and Ley, Sandra. 2020. Votes, Drugs, and Violence: The Political Logic of Criminal Wars in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trende, Sean. 2021. Was Trump Worth It for Republicans? In Sabato, Larry, Kondik, Kyle, and Coleman, Miles, eds. A Return to Normalcy? The 2020 Elections that (Almost) Broke America, 225–43. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Tsai, Jung-Hsiang. 2019. Populism and Democratic Crisis in Semi-Presidential Countries. Democratization 26:8 (December): 1458–74.Google Scholar

Tsatsanis, Emmanouil, Teperoglou, Eftichia, and Seriatos, Angelos. 2020. Two-Partyism Reloaded: Polarisation, Negative Partisanship, and the Return of the Left-Right Divide in the Greek Elections of 2019. South European Society and Politics 25:3–4 (October): 503–32.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2022. Constitutional Rigidity Matters. British Journal of Political Science 52:1 (January): 280–99.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems. British Journal of Political Science 25:3 (July): 289–325.Google Scholar

Tulis, Jeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Turan, I˙lter. 2015. Turkey’s Difficult Journey to Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tworzecki, Hubert. 2019. Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science 681 (January): 97–119.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. Me the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Uribe, Álvaro. 2012. No Hay Causa Perdida: Memorias. New York: Celebra.Google Scholar

Uribe, Álvaro. 2002. Manifiesto democrático del presidente de los colombianos Dr. Álvaro Uribe Vélez. Reprinted in María Osorio. 2012. Primer mandato presidencial de Uribe Vélez, 91–104. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.Google Scholar

Vachudova, Milada. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Cott, Donna. 2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Gunten, Tod. 2015. Cohesion, Consensus, and Conflict: Technocratic Elites and Financial Crisis in Mexico and Argentina. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 56:5 (October): 366–90.Google Scholar

Van Til, Jon. 2015. Democratic Resurgence in Hungary. In Krasztev, Péter and Van Til, Jon, eds. The Hungarian Patient, 367–83. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Varshney, Ashutosh. 2022. India’s Democratic Longevity and its Troubled Trajectory. In Mainwaring, Scott and Masoud, Tarek, eds. Democracy in Hard Places, 34–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Varshney, Ashutosh. 2019. The Emergence of Right-Wing Populism in India. In Gopal Jayal, Niraja, ed. Re-Forming India, 327–45. New Delhi: Penguin India.Google Scholar

Velarde, Julio, and Rodríguez, Martha. 1994. El programa de estabilización peruano: Evaluación del período 1991–1993. Documento de Trabajo no. 18. Lima: Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico (CIUP).Google Scholar

Velarde, Julio, and Rodríguez, Martha. 1992. El programa económico de Agosto de 1990. Documento de Trabajo no. 2. Lima: CIUP.Google Scholar

Vélez, Cristina, Ossa, Juan, and Montes, Paula. 2006. Y se hizo la reforma… In Hoskin, Gary and García Sánchez, Miguel, eds. La reforma política de 2003, 1–31. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes and Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar

Verbeek, Bertjan, and Zaslove, Andrej. 2019. Has Populism Eroded the Quality of European Democracy? In Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl, eds. When Democracy Trumps Populism, 84–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Verbeek, Bertjan, and Zaslove, Andrej. 2016. Italy: A Case of Mutating Populism? Democratization 23:2 (June): 304–23.Google Scholar

Vergara, Alberto. 2013. Alternancia sin alternativa: “Un año de Humala o veinte años de un sistema” Chap. in Ciudadanos sin República, 233–54. Lima: Planeta.Google Scholar

Vergara, Alberto. 2007. Ni amnésicos ni irracionales: Las elecciones peruanas de 2006 en perspectiva histórica. Lima: Solar.Google Scholar

Villacañas, José. 2017. El lento aprendizaje de Podemos. Madrid: Catarata.Google Scholar

Villagrán de León, Francisco. 1993. Thwarting the Guatemalan Coup. Journal of Democracy 4:4 (October): 117–24.Google Scholar

Villegas Aldas, Juan. 2010. Lucio Gutiérrez entra la antipolítica y el neopopulismo. M.A. thesis, FLACSO-Ecuador.Google Scholar

Vittori, Davide. 2018. Party Change in “Populist” Parties in Government: The Case of the Five Star Movement and SYRIZA. Italian Political Science 13:2 (October): 78–91.Google Scholar

Vivas, Fernando. 2022. Golpe a sí mismo: ¿Por qué Pedro Castillo intentó dissolver el Congreso sin tener un plan? El Comercio (Lima) (7 December).Google Scholar

Von Bülow, Marisa, and Abers, Rebecca. 2022. Denialism and Populism: Two Sides of a Coin in Jair Bolsonaro’s Brazil. Government and Opposition, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Waldmann, Peter. 1974. Der Peronismus 1943–1955. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar

Waldner, David, and Lust, Ellen. 2018. Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93–113.Google Scholar

Wallach, Philip. 2022. We Can Now Quantify Trump’s Sabotage of the GOP’s House Dreams. Washington Post (15 November).Google Scholar

Walter, Aaron. 2017. The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Populism: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. and Slovakia. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 17:2 (July): 166–83.Google Scholar

Walter, Barbara. 2022. How Civil Wars Start. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Webb, Adele, and Curato, Nicole. 2019. Populism in the Philippines. In Stockemer, Daniel, ed. Populism around the World, 49–65. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1976. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 5th ed. Johannes Winckelmann. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Weisman, Jonathan, and Epstein, Reid. 2022. G.O.P. Declares Jan. 6 Attack “Legitimate Political Discourse.” New York Times (4 February).Google Scholar

Welcome to Normal Politics: Italy’s Populists. 2020. Economist (August 22): 43.Google Scholar

Wendling, Mike. 2022. Far-Right Groups had Racism Rift before Capitol Riot. BBC News (December 22).Google Scholar

Werz, Nikolaus. 2007. Hugo Chávez und der “Sozialismus des 21. Jahrhunderts.” Ibero-Analysen 21 (December): 3–26.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2022a. How Populism Dies: Political Weaknesses of Personalistic Plebiscitarian Leadership. Political Science Quarterly 137:1 (Spring): 9–42.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2022b. Why US Democracy Trumps Populism: Comparative Lessons Reconsidered. PS: Political Science and Politics 55:3 (July): 478–83.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2021a. Assault on Democracy: Communism, Fascism, and Authoritarianism During the Interwar Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2021b. Populism as a Political Strategy: An Approach’s Enduring – and Increasing – Advantages. Political Studies 69:2 (May): 185–89.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2020. Populism’s Threat to Democracy. Perspectives on Populism 18:2 (June): 389–406.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2019. Populism and Authoritarianism. In de la Torre, Carlos, ed. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, 319–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2017. Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Taggart, Paul, et al., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism, 48–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2013. Latin America’s Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left. Journal of Democracy 24:3 (July): 18–32.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2009. The Rise of Latin America’s Two Lefts: Insights from Rentier State Theory. Comparative Politics 41:2 (January): 145–64.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2001. Clarifying a Contested Concept: “Populism” in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 34:1 (October): 1–22.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2000. A Paradox of Success? Determinants of Political Support for President Fujimori. International Studies Quarterly 44:3 (September): 481–502.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1999. Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 31:4 (July): 379–401.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Neo-Populism and Neo-Liberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development 32:3 (Fall 1996): 3–31.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1993. The Rise and Fall of President Collor. Journal of Interamerican Studies 35:1 (Summer): 1–37.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt, and Madrid, Raúl, eds. 2019. When Democracy Trumps Populism: European and Latin American Lessons for the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt, Madrid, Raúl, and Hunter, Wendy, eds. 2010. Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. 2018. The Bounded Independence of the American Courts. New York University Law Review 93: 70–74.Google Scholar

Wibbels, Erik. 2006. Dependency Revisited. International Organization 60:2 (Spring): 433–68.Google Scholar

Williams, Jack, and Curiel, John. 2020. Analysis of the Quick Count in the 2019 Bolivia Elections. Commissioned by Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Wills-Otero, Laura. 2014. Colombia: Analyzing the Strategies for Political Action of Álvaro Uribe’s Government, 2002–10. In Pablo Luna, Juan and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, eds. The Resilience of the Latin American Right, 194–215. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Wilpert, Gregory. 2007. Changing Venezuela by Taking Power: The History and Policies of the Chávez Government. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Winer, Anthony. 2018. Action and Reaction: The Trump Executive Orders and their Reception by the Federal Courts. Mitchell Hamline Law Review 44:3 (October): 907–34.Google Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 2017. Policy (Mis) Representation and the Cost of Ruling. Comparative Political Studies 50:6 (May): 711–38.Google Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. 2012. Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link. West European Politics 35:6 (November): 1407–32.Google Scholar

Wolf, Sonja. 2021. A Populist President Tests El Salvador’s Democracy. Current History 120: 823: 64–70.Google Scholar

Wolff, Jonas. 2020. The Turbulent End of an Era in Bolivia. Revista de Ciencia Política 40:2 (August): 163–86.Google Scholar

Wolff, Jonas. 2018. Ecuador after Correa. Revista de Ciencia Política 38:2 (August): 281–302.Google Scholar

Woodward, Bob. 2020. Rage. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Woodward, Bob. 2018. Fear: Trump in the White House. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Woodward, Bob, and Costa, Robert. 2021. Peril. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Wuthrich, Michael, and Ingleby, Melvyn. 2020. The Pushback against Populism in Turkey. Journal of Democracy 31:2 (April 2020): 24–40.Google Scholar

Wylde, Christopher. 2016. Post-Neoliberal Developmental Regimes in Latin America: Argentina under Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. New Political Economy 21:3 (May): 322–41.Google Scholar

Wylde, Christopher. 2011. State, Society, and Markets in Argentina: The Political Economy of Neodesarrollismo under Néstor Kirchner. Bulletin of Latin American Research 30:4 (October): 436–52.Google Scholar

Yavuz, Hakan. 2021. Erdog˘an: The Making of an Autocrat. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Yegen, Oya. 2017. Constitutional Changes under the AKP Government of Turkey. Tijdschrift voor Constutioneel Recht 70:1 (January): 70–84.Google Scholar

Zamir, Eyal. 2014. Loss Aversion: An Overview. Chap. in Law, Psychology, and Morality: The Role of Loss Aversion, 3–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zankina, Emilia. 2016. Theorizing the New Populism in Eastern Europe. Czech Journal of Political Science 23:2 (June): 182–99.Google Scholar

Zarnow, Leandra. 2022. “Send Her Back:” Trump’s Feud with Feminists and Conservative Women’s Triumph. In Zelizer, Julian, ed. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, 121–43. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Zemmouche, Florent. 2021. Elecciones legislativas y muncipales en El Salvador. Análisis Carolina 8 (March): 1–15.Google Scholar

Zepeda-Millán, Chris, and Wallace, Sophia. 2018. Mobilizing for Immigrant and Latino Rights under Trump. In Meyer, David and Tarrow, Sidney, eds. The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement, 90–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zifcak, Spencer. 1995. The Battle over Presidential Power in Slovakia. East European Constitutional Review 4:3 (Summer): 61–65.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Michael. 2019. Populism and Our Political Institutions. National Review 39 (Spring): 170–82.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive