When Europeanization Meets Transformation

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804939.004

3 - When Europeanization Meets Transformation

Lessons from the Unfinished Eastern European Revolutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Edited by

Michael McFaul and

Alina Mungiu-Pippidi: Affiliation:
Hertie School of Governance, Berlin
Valerie Bunce: Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Michael McFaul: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Kathryn Stoner-Weiss: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: UNDERSTANDING THE GRAVITY MODEL

One of the main theses of this book is that the international system plays a critical role in democratization, although a highly variable one. Undeniably, foreign influence was a powerful factor in the democratic transformation of Eastern Europe, from Gorbachev's decision that Eastern Europe needed to liberalize its Communist regimes to NATO bombing Milošević out of Serbian voters' favor and the European Union's commitment to include Romania and Bulgaria. There is no need for sophisticated analyses here: a simple counterfactual shows that if Communism as a global order had not broken down in Eastern Europe, the designated heir of Nicolae Ceauşescu, his son Nicu, would in all likelihood govern present day Romania, just as the son of Assad governs Syria and Kim Il Jong rules North Korea, following in his father's footsteps.

It is the “how” more than the “if” that is the focus of the present chapter, which concerns Europe's power to initiate and stimulate transformative processes in neighbor and/or accession countries. In comparison to the rest of the world, transitions with a European Union (EU) accession perspective have proved best so far: they seem to lead to democracy and prosperity faster and with smaller uncertainties and risks. This is the most robust illustration of the democratization mechanism known as the “gravity model,” “according to which fast and deep democratization is explained to a significant degree by the proximity and possibility of anchorage and integration with a major world centre of democracy.”

Type: Chapter
Information: Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Postcommunist World , pp. 59 - 81

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804939.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kopstein, Jeffrey and Reilly, David. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Post-Communist World.” World Politics, 53, No. 1 (2000), pp. 1–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Grabbe, H.. The EU's Transformative Power. Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)Google Scholar

Pridham, G.. “Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post-Communist Europe.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45, No. 2 (2005): 524–5Google Scholar

Vachudov'a, M. A.. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration After Communism (Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelley, J. G.. Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Kubicek, Paul J., “International Norms, the European Union, and Democratization: Tentative Theory and Evidence.” in The European Union and Democratization, Kubicek, Paul J., ed., pp. 1–29 (London: Routledge, 2003)CrossRef Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U., “Conclusions: The Impact of the EU on the Accession Countries,” in The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (eds.), pp. 210–228 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Jacoby, Wade, The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe (Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRef Google Scholar

Pridham, G. and Gallagher, T., Experimenting with Democracy: Regime Change in the Balkans (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar

Vachudova, Milada Anna, Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration After Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, Jr. Barrington, Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt (White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1978)CrossRef Google Scholar

Keating, M., Loughlin, J., and Deschouwer, K., Culture, Institutions and Economic Development. A Study of Eight European Regions (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 2003)Google Scholar

Grabbe, Heather, “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (2001), p 6CrossRef Google Scholar

Goetz, K. H., and Margetts, H. Z., “The Solitary Centre: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe.” Governance, 12, No. 4 (1999), 425–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Grabbe, H., The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenn, J. K., “From Nation-States to Member States: Accession Negotiations as an Instrument of Europeanization.” Comparative European Politics, 2, No. 1 (2004), 3–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Hughes, J., Sasse, G., and Gordon, C., Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU's Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004)Google Scholar

Vass, L., “Regional Reform in Hungary: Does EU Enlargement Matter?” In Driven to Change: The European Union's Enlargement Viewed from the East, Dimitrova, A. L., ed., pp. 131–44 (Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Dimitrova, A., “Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU's Administrative Capacity Requirement.” West European Politics 25, No. 4 (2002), 171–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Verheijen, T., Administrative Capacity in the New Member States: The Limits of Innovation? World Bank Report 36930-GLB (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006)Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., “Civil Service Reform in Post-Communist Europe: The Bumpy Road to Depoliticisation.” West European Politics, 27, No. 1 (2004), 77–103CrossRef Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., “The Institutionalization of Political Discretion in Post-Communist Civil Service Systems: The Case of Hungary.” Public Administration, 84, No. 3 (2006), 693–715CrossRef Google Scholar

Smilov, D., “EU Enlargement and the Constitutional Principle of Judicial Independence.” in Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law? The Impact of EU Enlargement on the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Legal Orders, Sadurski, W., Czarnota, A., and Krygier, M., eds., pp. 313–34 (Netherlands: Springer, 2005)Google Scholar

Mungiu-Pippidi, A., “EU Accession Is No End of History.” Journal of Democracy, 18, No. 4 (2007), pp. 8–16Google Scholar

Linz, J., and Stepan, A., Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Almond, G. A., Comparative Politics Today: A World View (Boston: Little Brown, 1974), pp. 14–41Google Scholar

Sedelmeier, Ulrich, “Europeanisation in New Member and Candidate States.” Living Reviews in European Governance, 1 (2006)CrossRef Google Scholar