Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Authors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- One Introduction
- Two The Diversity of Mini-Publics: A Systematic Overview
- Three Recruitment
- Four The Deliberative Experience
- Five Evidence in Deliberative Mini-Publics
- Six Outputs
- Seven Legitimacy of Deliberative Mini-Publics
- Eight Deliberative Mini-Publics in Democratic Systems
- Nine Conclusion
- Notes
- References
- Index
Four - The Deliberative Experience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 April 2023
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Authors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- One Introduction
- Two The Diversity of Mini-Publics: A Systematic Overview
- Three Recruitment
- Four The Deliberative Experience
- Five Evidence in Deliberative Mini-Publics
- Six Outputs
- Seven Legitimacy of Deliberative Mini-Publics
- Eight Deliberative Mini-Publics in Democratic Systems
- Nine Conclusion
- Notes
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Taking part in a DMP is a unique experience. Even though these processes are gaining increasing popularity, only a handful of citizens will have the privilege of being selected to participate in a DMP. Being in a mini-public is comparable to being selected to a jury – a unique experience designed to reach a considered judgement among a diverse group of people.
The uniqueness of the deliberative experience rests on the forum's design. Well-designed mini-publics can facilitate respectful conversations, an informed exchange of ideas, active listening and reflection. All these are crucial for citizens who may have conflicting values and preferences to come together, work out complex issues and generate outputs that can inform policymakers and the wider public debate. The academic literature on mini-publics has chronicled the positive effects of the deliberative experience on participants. Participants feel more politically attuned, interested and informed about politics (Grönlund et al, 2010; Fournier et al, 2011; Boulianne 2018). Others demonstrate shifts in preferences once they learn more about an issue (Himmelroos and Christensen, 2014). The impact of deliberation on social learning and generating a shared identity has also been documented (Hartz-Karp et al, 2010; Fournier et al, 2011).
Not all mini-publics, however, generate the same experience. DMPs can also reinforce inequalities that exist in the public sphere. Some mini-publics have been criticized for supporting an already-decided policy (Johnson, 2015). Others raise concerns about participants carrying their biases in deliberation, as in the case of women's arguments not getting the same amount of uptake compared to their male counterparts making the same argument (Beauvais, 2019). All these are concerns about the deliberative experience.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Deliberative Mini-PublicsCore Design Features, pp. 48 - 68Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2021