from Part I - Political Parties, Politician Elites and the Voters
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
INTRODUCTION
Since the 1998 collapse of Soeharto's New Order regime, Indonesia has seen rapid and fundamental changes in its political institutions. Simultaneous processes of democratic reform and administrative decentralization have transformed the country's once centralized, authoritarian political system into a more decentralized and democratic one. At the core of democratic reforms has been the introduction of competitive elections and, during the last ten years, Indonesia has successfully staged two general elections (in 1999 and 2004) as well as its first-ever direct presidential election (in 2004). Administrative decentralization has also been a key dimension of political change. In January 2001, two laws on regional autonomy devolved a wide range of power and authority to the regions.
In Indonesia and internationally, many advocates of political reform suggest political decentralization is an effective way to consolidate democracy. In September 1999, Indonesia's local assemblies recovered their right to elect and dismiss local government heads. While the elections of local government heads by Local Assembly members decentralized Indonesia's politics, the character and results of those elections were complex and controversial. The indirect local elections fuelled a rash of “money politics” at the local level, in which party representatives in local assemblies effectively sold their votes to candidates regardless of their parties’ official lines.
In 2002, responding to criticisms from domestic and international organizations and in an effort to achieve consistency with the amended constitution, the National Assembly adopted a direct election system for local government heads. In June 2005, the Indonesian government commenced another important step towards more decentralized politics by holding direct elections for local government heads — i.e., provincial governors, district regents (bupati), and municipal mayors (walikota). From June 2005 to September 2007, sixteen gubernatorial and over 280 regent and mayoral elections were held. Over the next couple of years, the remaining provinces, districts, and municipalities will hold similar elections. This essay examines how Indonesia's experiment with direct local elections has affected local political dynamics and governance in a single locality. It does so through an analysis of a mayoral election on the island of Batam in the Riau Archipelago.1
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.