Tables
4.2Representation of online divorce cases, first-instance adjudications
6.1Correlates of annual court case volume (1,000s of closed cases), unstandardized linear regression coefficients
6.2Correlates of judge population, unstandardized linear regression coefficients
6.3Correlates of cases per judge, unstandardized linear regression coefficients
6.4Correlates of percentage of divorces granted (of adjudicated divorce petitions), unstandardized linear regression coefficients
6.5Application of the simplified procedure and plaintiff win rates by case type, first-instance adjudications
6.6Time to decision (mean/median days) by case type, first-instance civil adjudications
6.7Length of written decisions (mean/median characters) by case type, first-instance civil adjudications
6.8Female litigants by case type, first-instance adjudications
7.1Proportion of plaintiffs’ petitions and judges’ holdings (%)containing domestic violence language
8.2Typology of judicial discourse in holdings to deny divorce petitions
8.3Proportion of judges’ holdings (%) containing types of words, by plaintiff claim of domestic violence
8.4Proportion of judges’ holdings (%) containing types of words, by plaintiff sex and outcome
8.5Average marginal effects on the appearance of word types in judges’ holdings, calculated from logistic regression models
8.6Frequency distributions (%) of main variables in regression models
8.7Average marginal effects on adjudicated denials, calculated from logistic regression models
9.1Proportion of plaintiffs (%) granted divorce, by number of attempts until divorce granted
9.2Proportion of plaintiffs (%) granted divorce, by duration of time from initial filing to granted divorce
9.3Correlates of time (days) from initial filing to granted divorce, unstandardized linear regression coefficients (means)/quantile regression coefficients (medians)
11.1Frequency distributions (%) of main variables in regression models
11.2Average marginal effects on receiving child custody, rural courts, calculated from logistic regression models
11.3Average marginal effects on receiving child custody, urban courts, calculated from logistic regression models
11.5Proportion of litigants (%) with physical possession of a child
11.6Proportion of couples (%) with children of various sex compositions
11.8Proportion of litigants (%) awarded custody of daughters and sons
11.9Average predicted probabilities of courts’ granting child custody
Open access