Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:42:03.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Foundations, Theory, and Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

Edited by
Ran Hirschl  and
Yaniv Roznai
Ran Hirschl
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Yaniv Roznai
Affiliation:
Reichman University, Israel
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Deciphering the Genome of Constitutionalism
The Foundations and Future of Constitutional Identity
 , pp. 21 - 98
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Balkin, Jack. 1998. “The Meaning of Constitutional Tragedy.” In Constitutional Stupidities/Constitutional Tragedies, edited by Eskridge, William N. and Levinson, Sanford, 121–28. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Enemies on Human Liberty, edited by Hardy, Henry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colon-Rios, Juan. 2020. Constituent Power and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Jason. 2010. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom ed. 2014. Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. 1999. The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 2008. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2007. Toward Juristocracy: The Origin and Consequences of the Rise of New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1991. “Declarations of Independence: Arendt and Derrida on the Problem of Founding a Republic.” American Political Science Review 85 (1): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey, and Roznai, Yaniv. 2020. Constitutional Revolutions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Versteeg, Mila. 2013. “Sham Constitutions.” California Law Review 101: 863–952.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Connor Cruise. 2002. “Rousseau, Robespierre, Burke, Jefferson, and the French Revolution.” In Social Contract, edited by Dunn, Susan, 310–24. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Putterman, Ethan. 2001. “Realism and Reform in Rousseau’s Constitutional Projects for Poland and Corsica.” Political Studies 49 (3): 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, David. 1987. “Rousseau’s Unanimous Contract and the Doctrine of Popular Sovereignty.” History of Political Thought 8 (1): 83–110.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2001. Letter to Beaumont, Letters Written from the Mountain, and Related Writings, edited by Kelly, C. and Grace, E.. Hanover, UK: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2002. Social Contract, edited by Dunn, Susan. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2014. “On the Government of Poland.” In Rousseau: The Plan for Perpetual Peace, on the Government of Poland, and Other Political Writings, edited by Kelly, Christopher, 169–240. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1962. “Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion.” The American Political Science Review 56 (4): 853–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, Howard. 2016. “The Limits of Political Representation.” American Political Science Review 110 (2): 382–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, Howard. 2021. “Constitutional Revolutions: The People, the Text, and the Hermeneutic of Legitimation.” Maryland Law Review 81 (1): 226–42.Google Scholar
Srinivassan, N. 1940. “The Theory of the Constituent Assembly.” Indian Journal of Political Science 1 (4): 376–92.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1983. “Constitution-Making: An Introduction.” Texas Law Review 91 (7): 1983–2013.Google Scholar
Venn Dicey, Albert. 1885. An Introduction to the Study of the Law of Constitution. New York: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. 2007. Rousseau’s Platonic Enlightenment. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

References

Adams, John. 1776. ‘II. Letter to John Penn 27 March 1776’. Founders Online, National Archivs https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-04-02-0026-0003.Google Scholar
Burgmeister, Jörg and Greve, Holger. 2019. ‘Parité-Gesetz und Demokratieprinzip: Verfassungsauftrag oder Identitätsverstoß?’ Zeitschrift Für Gesetzgebung 34 (2): 154–173.Google Scholar
BVerfG, Judgement of 30 June 2009, 2 BvE 2/08 – Lisbon Judgement.Google Scholar
BVerfG, Order of 15 December 2020, 2 BvC 46/19 – Unsuccessful Electoral Complaint.Google Scholar
Calliess, Christian. 2020. ‘Constitutional Identity in Germany: One for Three or Three in One’. In Constitutional Identity in Europa of Multilevel Constitutionalism, edited by Calliess, Christian and von der Schyff, Gerhard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–181.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag and Bundesarchiv (eds.). 2002a. Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949, Akten und Protokolle, Vol. 13, Ausschuss für Organisation des Bundes/Ausschuss für Verfassungsgerichtshof und Rechtspflege. subvol. I. Oldenbourg: Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag and Bundesarchiv (eds.). 2002b. Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949, Akten und Protokolle, Vol. 13, Ausschuss für Organisation des Bundes/Ausschuss für Verfassungsgerichtshof und Rechtspflege. subvol. II. Oldenbourg: Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Di Fabio, Udo. 2018. ‘Staatsrechtler hält Gesetz für mehr Frauen im Parlament für verfassungswidrig’. Der Spiegel, December 28. www.spiegel.de/politik/deutsch/udo-di-fabio-gegen-frauenquoten-vorschlag-von-katarina-barley-a-1207777.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hohmann-Dennhardt, Christine. 2020. ‘Der Kampf geht weiter’. Verfassungsblog, July 17. https://verfassungsblog.de/der-kampf-geht-weiter/.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klafki, Anika. 2020. ‘Parität – Der deutsche Diskurs im globalen Kontext’. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 73 (19): 856–866.Google Scholar
Laskowski, Silke. 2014. ‘Pro Parité: Ohne gleichberechtigte Parlamente keine gleichberechtigten Gesetze und keine gleichberechtigte Gesellschaft! Eine juristische Streitschrift für ein modernes Wahlrecht’. Zeitschrift des deutschen Jurisstinnenbundes 17 (3): 93–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”’. The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlok, Martin and Hobush, Alexander. 2019. ‘Ade parité? – Zur Verfassungswidrigkeit verpflichtender Quotenregelungen bei Landeslisten’. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 72 (1): 14–20.Google Scholar
Pernice-Warnke, Silvia. 2020. ‘Parlamente als Spiegel der Bevölkerung’. Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 135 (2): 81–90.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2006. ‘Dealing with Difference: A Politics of Ideas or a Politics of Presence?’ in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip (eds.) Oxford: Blackwell, 171–182.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 2004. ‘Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance’. Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polzin, Monika. 2019. ‘Parité-Gesetz in Brandenburg – Kein Sieg für die Demokratie’. Verfassungsblog, February 8. https://verfassungsblog.de/parite-gesetz-in-brandenburg-kein-sieg-fuer-die-demokratie.Google Scholar
Polzin, Monika. 2022. ‘Transnational Lists, Diversity and Quota Regulation’. EU Law Live, December 3. https://eulawlive.com/app/uploads/weekend_edition_123.pdf.Google Scholar
Redaktion des Landtages Brandenburg. 2020. ‘Landtagspräsidentin verteidigt Paritätsgesetz vor Verfassungsgericht – Landtag Brandenburg’. August 20. www.landtag.brandenburg.de/de/aktuelles/neuigkeiten/aktuelle_meldungen/landtagspraesidentin_verteidigt_paritaetsgesetz_vor_verfassungsgericht/12452.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2023 ‘Spain Announces Law Promoting Gender Parity in Politics and Business’. March 3. www.reuters.com/world/europe/spain-announces-law-promoting-gender-parity-politics-business-2023-03-04/.Google Scholar
Röhner, Cara. 2019. Ungleichheit und Verfassung. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth and Ruiz, Blanca Rodríguez. 2008. ‘The Gender of Representation: On Democracy, Equality and Parity’. International Journal Comparative Law 6 (2): 287–316.Google Scholar
Süssmuth, Rita, von Achenbach, Jelena, Brosius-Gersdorf, Frauke, Hohmann-Dennhardt, Christine, Jaeger, Renate, Laskowski, Silke, and Wapler, Friederike. 2020. ‘Es Gibt Keinen Besitzstandsschutz Im Wahlrecht’. Verfassungsblog, October 21. https://verfassungsblog.de/es-gibt-keinen-besitzstandsschutz-im-wahlrecht/.Google Scholar
Thür.VerfGH. 2020. Judgment. July 15. 2/20.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2012. ‘Attack or Retreat? Evolving Themes and Strategies of the Judicial Dialogue between the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’. In Constitutional Conversations in Europe, edited by Claes, Monica, de Visser, Maartje, Popelier, Patricia and Van de Heyning., Catherine Cambridge, UK: Intersentia, 235–250.Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, von Antje. 2019. ‘Parité-Gesetzgebung auf dem Prüfstand des Verfassungsrechts’. Juristenzeitung 74 (11): 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VerfGBbg. 2020a. Judgment. October 23. 9/19.Google Scholar
VerfGBbg. 2020b. Judgment. October 23. 55/19.Google Scholar
Volk, Laura. 2022. Paritätisches Wahlrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abdul Aziz Bari. 2008. ‘The Indigenous Roots of the Malaysian Constitution – The Provisions and the Implications’. Current Law Journal 6: xxxiii.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 2006. ‘Interpreting the Women’s Movement’. California Law Review 94: 1421–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Ibrahim. 1988. Ke Arah Islamisasi Undang-Undang di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia.Google Scholar
Carson v Makin, 597 U.S. (2021).Google Scholar
Che Omar Bin Che Soh v PP [1988] 2 MLJ 55 (Malaysia).Google Scholar
Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947).Google Scholar
Fernando, Joseph M. 2002. The Making of the Malayan Constitution. Kuala Lumpur: MBRAS.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. and Perry, Samuel L.. 2022. The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, Jeremy T. 2012. ‘The Separation of Church and State versus Religion in the Public Square: The Contested History of the Establishment Clause’. In No Establishment of Religion: America’s Original Contribution to Religious Liberty, edited by Gunn, Jeremy T., and Witte, John. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Lawrence and Chung, Andrew. 2022. ‘U.S. Supreme Court takes aim at separation of church and state’. Reuters, June 29, 2022. www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-takes-aim-separation-church-state-2022-06-28/.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2006. ‘Constitutional Identity’. The Review of Politics 68: 361–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy v Bremerton School District, 597 U.S. (2021).Google Scholar
Kesavanada Bharati v State of Kerala, 4 S.C.C 225; A.I.R 1973 SC 1461 (India) (1973).Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. 2012. ‘Review: Constitutions and National Identity’. The Review of Politics 74 (1): 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. 2003. ‘Establishment and Disestablishment at the Founding, Part I: Establishment of Religion’. William & Mary Law Review 44: 2105–2208.Google Scholar
McVicar, Michael J. 2016. ‘The Religious Right in America’. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion, 3 March 2016; accessed 28 May 2023. https://oxfordre.com/religion/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-97.Google Scholar
Mutalib, Hussin. 1993. Islam in Malaysia: From Revivalism to Islamic State? Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark A., Hatch, Nathan O., and Marsden, George M.. 1981. The Search for Christian America. Westchester: Crossway Books.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2006. ‘Many Americans Uneasy with Mix of Religion and Politics’. 24 August 2006. www.pewresearch.org/religion/2006/08/24/many-americans-uneasy-with-mix-of-religion-and-politics/#1Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2022. ‘Religion in Public Life’. 27 October 2022. www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/10/27/religion-in-public-life/.Google Scholar
Ramirez v Collier, 595 U.S. (2022).Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. 2012. ‘Constitutional Identity’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rosenfeld, Michael and András, Sajó. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurtleff v. City of Boston, 596 U.S. (2002).Google Scholar
Smith Gregory, A., Rotolo, Michael and Tevington, Patricia. 2022. ‘45% of Americans Say U.S. Should Be a “Christian Nation”’. 27 October 2022. www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/10/27/45-of-americans-say-u-s-should-be-a-christian-nation/Google Scholar
Straughn, Jeremy Brooke and Feld, Scott L.. 2010. ‘America as a “Christian Nation”? Understanding Religious Boundaries of National Identity in the United States’. Sociology of Religion 71 (3): 280–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Andrew L., and Perry, Samuel L.. 2022. Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. 2006. ‘Facts and Fictions about the History of Separation of Church and State’. Journal of Church & State 48: 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1997. ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’. Virginia Law Review 83: 771–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannemann, Gerhard. 2012. ‘Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences?’ In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, edited by Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard, 383–420. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. 2017. ‘Revolutionary Constitutionalism’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 15: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary, and Roznai, Yaniv. 2020. Constitutional Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. 2009. The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture and Community. Philadelphia: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, Theunis. 2018. The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Richard. 2019. Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, Andrew. 2016. Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, Aharon. 2015. Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredin, Jean-Denis. 1988. Sieyès: La clé de la Révolution française. Paris: Éditions de Fallois.Google Scholar
Carré de Malberg, Raymond. 2004. Contribution à la Théorie Générale de l’État. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Colón-Ríos, Joel. 2020. Constituent Power and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreres Comella, Victor. 2009. Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values: A European Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. 2000. The Federalist. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. 2020. Sovereignty, RIP. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey, and Roznai, Yaniv. 2020. Constitutional Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2015. An Argument Open to All: Reading the Federalist in the 21st 111 Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968. The Social Contract. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. 2017. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. 2021. “The Boundaries of Constituent Authority.” Connecticut Law Review 53 (5): 1381–1408.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieyès. 2003. Political Writings. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Verdugo, Sergio. 2023. “Is It Time to Abandon the Theory of Constituent Power?” I.CON, International Journal of Constitutional Law 21 (1): 14–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Babo-Soares, Dionisio. 2003. Branching from the Trunk: East Timorese Perceptions of Nationalism in Transition. PhD Thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 2002. Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher S. and Joenniemi, Pertti. 2017. ‘Ontological Security, Self-articulation and the Securitization of Identity’. Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Simon. 2002. ‘East Timor in Transition: Self-determination, State-building and the United Nations’. International Peacekeeping 9 (1): 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, Stuart. 2012. ‘Constructing Ontological Insecurity: The Insecuritization of Britain’s Muslims’. Contemporary Security Policy 33 (2): 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, James. 2001. Crimes against Humanity in East Timor, January to October 1999: Their Nature and Causes. Dili: UNTAET.Google Scholar
Dunn, James. 2003. East Timor: A Rough Passage to Independence. Double Bay: Longueville Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Grenfell, Laura. 2013. Promoting the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusmão, Xanana. 2000. To Resist Is to Win! The Autobiography of Xanana Gusmão, edited by Niner, Sarah. Richmond: Aurora Books.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
JSMP. 2005a. Judge Applies Customary Law in a Criminal Case, Press Release. Dili: Judicial System Monitoring Programme, 19 May.Google Scholar
JSMP. 2005b. The Interaction of Traditional Dispute Resolution with the Formal Justice Sector in Timor-Leste. Dili: Judicial System Monitoring Programme, November.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. ‘Globalization and Religions Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security’. Political Psychology 25 (5): 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2017. ‘Feeling Ontologically (In)secure: States, Traumas and the Governing of Gendered Space’. Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina and Mitzen, Jennifer. 2020. ‘Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics: Thinking with and beyond Giddens’. International Theory 12 (2): 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, R.D. 1969. The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Leach, Michael. 2006. ‘History on the Line: East Timorese History after Independence’. History Workshop Journal 61 (1): 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Michael. 2009. ‘The 2007 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections in Timor-Leste’. Australian Journal of Politics and History 55 (2): 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupovici, Amir. 2012. ‘Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities and Israel’s Unilateral Steps Towards the Palestinians’. Review of International Studies 38 (4): 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossdale, Chris. 2015. ‘Enclosing Critique: The Limits of Ontological Security’. International Political Sociology 9 (4): 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subotic, Jelena. 2016. ‘Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change’. Foreign Policy Analysis 12 (4): 610–627.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena. 2018. ‘Political Memory, Ontological Security, and Holocaust Remembrance in Post-communist Europe’. European Security 27 (3): 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trindade, Jose and Castro, Bryant. 2007. Rethinking Timorese Identity as a Peacebuilding Strategy: The Lorosa’e-Loromonu Conflict from a Traditional Perspective, European Union Technical Assistance to the National Dialogue Process in Timor-Leste. Dili: GTZ.Google Scholar
UN. 1999. Report of the Secretary-General: Question of East Timor. UN Doc. A/53/951-S/1999/513, 5 May.Google Scholar
UN. 2006. United Nations Independent Special Commission of Inquiry for Timor-Leste. UN Doc. S/2006/822, 2 October.Google Scholar
UNTAET Constitutional Affairs Branch. 2001. Constitutional Commission Public Hearings, Executive Summary. Dili: UNTAET.Google Scholar
USAID. 2007. Rule of Law in Timor-Leste. Dili: Freedom House, USAID and the ABA Rule of Law Initiative.Google Scholar
Wallis, Joanne. 2012. ‘A Local-liberal Peace Project in Action? The Increasing Engagement between the Local and Liberal in East Timor’. Review of International Studies 38 (4): 735–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Joanne. 2013. ‘Victors, Villains and Victims: Capitalising on Memory in Timor-Leste’. Ethnopolitics 12 (2): 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Joanne. 2014. Constitution Making during State Building. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Joanne. 2017. ‘Is “good enough” Peacebuilding Good Enough? The Potential and Pitfalls of the Local Turn in Peacebuilding in Timor-Leste’. The Pacific Review 30 (2): 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Joanne. 2019. ‘Timor-Leste is a Rich Country, but also a Poor One: The Effect and Effectiveness of Public Transfer Schemes’. In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Timor-Leste, edited by McWilliam, Andrew and Leach, Michael, 124–135. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Joanne and Neves, Guteriano. 2021. ‘Evaluating the Legacy of State-building in Timor-Leste’. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 9 (1): 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2010. ‘Ontological (In)Security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan’. International Relations 24 (3): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Baxi, Upendra. 2000. ‘Constitutionalism as a Site of State Formative Practices’. Cardozo Law Review 21: 1183–1210.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2007. ‘Book Review: Understanding Constitutional Secularism in ‘Faraway Places’: Some Remarks on Gary Jacobsohn’s The Wheel of Law’. Indian Journal of Constitutional Law 1: 231–243.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2013a. ‘“Ordering” Constitutional Transfers: A View from India’. In From Order to Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture, edited by Frankenberg, Günter, 189–208. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2013b. ‘Preliminary Notes on Transformative Constitutionalism’. In Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing the Apex Courts of Brazil, India and South Africa, edited by Vilhena, Oscar, Baxi, Upendra and Viljoen, Frans, 19–48. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2013. The Future of Human Rights (3rd ed., Delhi, Oxford University Press, 172–177; the 4th ed., forthcoming, 2024).Google Scholar
Carlier, Jean-Yves, Crépeau, François, and Purkey, Anna. 2020. ‘From the 2015 European “Migration Crisi” to the 2018 Global Compact for Migration: A Political Transition Short on Legal Standards’. McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law & Policy 16 (1): 35–81.Google Scholar
Clarke, Jessica A. 2015. ‘Identity and Form’. California Law Review 103 (4): 747–839.Google Scholar
Collier, David, Daniel Hidalgo, Fernando, and Olivia Maciucean, Andra. 2006. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications’. Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (3): 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dani, Marco. 2013. ‘The “Partisan Constitution” and the Corrosion of European Constitutional Culture’. LEQS Paper No. l8/2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P. 1993. ‘Constitutional Identity’. Cardozo law Review 14: 736–746.Google Scholar
Foran, Michael. 2020. ‘Constitutional Legitimacy, Artificial Reason, and the Common Law’. Strathclyde Law Blog. Posted on October 9, 2020. www.strath.ac.uk/humanities/lawschool/blog/constitutionallegitimacyartificialreasonandthecommonlaw/.Google Scholar
Foran, Michael. 2022. ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Reasonableness Review: Artificial Reason and Wrongful Discrimination’. Edinburgh Law Review 26 (3): 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, Walter B. 1956a. ‘Art as an Essentially Contested Concept’. The Philosophical Quarterly 6 (23): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, Walter B. 1956b. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebeye, Berihun Adugna. 2023. ‘The Identity of the Constitutional Subject and the Construction of Constitutional Identity: Lessons from Africa’. UCL Research Paper Series 2/2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2010. Constitutional Theocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2014. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative: Constitutional Law. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 2006. The Wheel of Law: India’s Secularism in Comparative Constitutional Context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 2016. ‘Constitutional Identity’. In The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Mehta, Pratap Bhanu, 110–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 2017. Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Jasper. 2018. The European Migrant Crisis: Psychology, Conflict, and Intergroup Relations. Barcelona: United Nations University, Institute for Globalization, Culture, and Migration.Google Scholar
Leong, Nancy. 2016. ‘Identity Entrepreneurs’. California Law Review 104 (6): 1335–1339.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1995. ‘How Many Times Has the United States Constitution been Amended? (A) <26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) >27: Accounting for Constitutional Change’. In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 13–36. Princeton: Princeton University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, Hans. 2013. Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Jonathan. 2005. Perfection and Disharmony in the Thought of Jean- Jacques Rousseau. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordechay, Nadiv and Roznai, Yaniv. 2017. ‘Symposium: Constitutional Capture in Israel?’ ICON-S-IL, August 23, 2017. www.iconnectblog.com/2017/08/constitutional-retrogression-israel.Google Scholar
Murray, Douglas. 2017. The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Oklopcic, Zoran. 2018. Beyond the People: Social Imaginary and Constituent Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parvik, Nassim and Pollock, Anne. 2020. ‘Unintended by Design: On the Political Uses of “Unintended Consequences”’. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6: 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. 2012. Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture, and Community. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. 2017. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv and Jacobsohn, Gary. 2020. ‘Judicial Activism, Courts and Constitutional Revolutions – The Case of Israel’. In Judicial Review: Process, Power, and Problems: Essays in Honor of Professor Upendra Baxi, edited by Khursid, Salman, Luthera, Siddarth, Malik, Lokendra and Bedi, Shruti, 163–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scholtes, Julian. 2001. ‘Abusing Constitutional Identity’. German Law Journal 22 (4): 534–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scudder, Molly. 2016. ‘Beyond Empathy: Strategies and Ideals of Democratic Deliberation’. Polity, 48 (4): 524–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1994. ‘Political Equality and Unintended Consequences’. Columbia Law Review 94: 1390–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tew, Yvonne. 2018. ‘Stealth Theocracy’. Virginia Journal of International Law 58: 31–96.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2009. ‘The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law’. Virginia Journal of International Law 49 (4): 985–1006.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer. 2012. ‘Comparative, Global and Transnational Constitutionalism: The Emergence of a Transnational Legal-Pluralist Order’. Global Constitutionalism 1: 16–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×