The Logical Underpinnings of Intelligent Design

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804823.018

17 - The Logical Underpinnings of Intelligent Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

William A. Dembski

Edited by

William A. Dembski and

Michael Ruse

Show author details

William A. Dembski: Affiliation:
Associate Research Professor in the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Baylor University; Senior Fellow, Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture in Seattle
William A. Dembski: Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Michael Ruse: Affiliation:
Florida State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

RANDOMNESS

For many natural scientists, design, conceived as the action of an intelligent agent, is not a fundamental creative force in nature. Rather, material mechanisms, characterized by chance and necessity and ruled by unbroken laws, are thought to be sufficient to do all nature's creating. Darwin's theory epitomizes this rejection of design.

But how do we know that nature requires no help from a designing intelligence? Certainly, in special sciences ranging from forensics to archaeology to SETI (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence), appeal to a designing intelligence is indispensable. What's more, within these sciences there are well-developed techniques for identifying intelligence. What if these techniques could be formalized and applied to biological systems, and what if they registered the presence of design? Herein lies the promise of Intelligent Design (or ID, as it is now abbreviated).

My own work on ID began in 1988 at an interdisciplinary conference on randomness at Ohio State University. Persi Diaconis, a well-known statistician, and Harvey Friedman, a well-known logician, convened the conference. The conference came at a time when “chaos theory,” or “nonlinear dynamics,” was all the rage and supposed to revolutionize science. James Gleick, who had written a wildly popular book titled Chaos, covered the conference for the New York Times.

Type: Chapter
Information: Debating Design
From Darwin to DNA
, pp. 311 - 330

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804823.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Axe, D. 2000. Extreme functional sensitivity to conservative amino acid changes on enzyme exteriors. Journal of Molecular Biology 301: 585–95CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Borel, E. 1962. Probabilities and Life, trans. M. Baudin. New York: Dover

Chaitin, G. J. 1966. On the length of programs for computing finite binary sequences. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 13: 547–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Dam, K. W., and H. S. Lin (eds.) 1996. Cryptography's Role in Securing the Information Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Darwin, C. [1859] 1964. On the Origin of Species, facsimile 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Davies, P. 1999. The Fifth Miracle. New York: Simon and Schuster

Dawkins, R. 1996. Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: Norton

Dembski, W. A. 1991. Randomness by design. Nous 25(1): 75–106CrossRef Google Scholar

Dembski, W. A. 1998a. Randomness. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Craig. London: Routledge

Dembski, W. A. 1998b. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dembski, W. A. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield

Earman, J. 1992. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Fisher, R. A. 1935. The Design of Experiments. New York: Hafner

Jackson, F. 1987. Conditionals. Oxford: Blackwell

Kauffman, S. 2000. Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press

Knobloch, E. 1987. Emile Borel as a probabilist. In The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. 1, ed. L. Krüger, L. J. Daston, and M. Heidelberger. 215–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 215–33

Kolmogorov, A. 1965. Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii (in translation) 1(1): 3–11Google Scholar

Lloyd, S. 2002. Computational capacity of the universe. Physical Review Letters 88(23): 7901–4CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McKeon, R. (ed.) 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House

Meyer, S. C. 2003. DNA and the origin of life: Information, specification, and explanation. In Darwinism, Design and Public Education, ed. J. A. Campbell and S. C. Meyer, Lansing: Michigan State University Press

Orgel, L. 1973. The Origins of Life. New York: Wiley

Polanyi, M. 1967. Life transcending physics and chemistry. Chemical and Engineering News 45: 54–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. 1968. Life's irreducible structure. Science 113: 1308–12CrossRef Google Scholar