The Emergence of Biological Value

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804823.012

11 - The Emergence of Biological Value

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

James Barham

Edited by

William A. Dembski and

Michael Ruse

Show author details

James Barham: Affiliation:
Trained in classics and history of science, University of Texas at Austin and Harvard University
William A. Dembski: Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Michael Ruse: Affiliation:
Florida State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

All the things we think of as paradigmatic cases of design – novels, paintings, symphonies, clothes, houses, automobiles, computers – are the work of human hands guided by human minds. Thus, design might be defined as matter arranged by a mind for a purpose that it values. But this raises the question, what are minds? Presumably, the activity of brains. The problem with this answer, however, is that brains themselves give every appearance of being designed. Most contemporary thinkers view brains as neurons arranged for the purpose of thinking in much the same way that, say, mousetraps are springs and levers arranged for the purpose of killing mice. But if that is so, then who arranged the neurons? Who or what values thinking, and whose purpose does it serve?

It is generally supposed that there are only two ways to answer these questions. One way has come to be known as Intelligent Design. On this view, our brains were designed by other minds existing elsewhere – say, in another galaxy or on another plane of being. But if these other minds are also instantiated in matter, then we have the same problem all over again. If not, then we have an even more difficult problem than the one we started with. To invoke immaterial minds to explain the design of material ones is surely a case of obscurum per obscurius.

Type: Chapter
Information: Debating Design
From Darwin to DNA
, pp. 210 - 226

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804823.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albrecht-Buehler, G. 1990. In defense of “nonmolecular” cell biology. International Review of Cytology 120: 191–241CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alon, U., Surette, M. G., Barkai, N., and Leibler, S.. (1999). Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397: 168–171CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alt, W. 1994. Cell motion and orientation: Theories of elementary behavior between environmental stimulation and autopoietic regulation. In Frontiers in Mathematical Biology, ed. S. A. Levin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 79–101

Anderson, P. W. (1994). More is different. In P. W. Anderson, A Career in Theoretical Physics, pp. 1–4. Singapore: World Scientific. (Originally published in Science 177 (1972): 393–6.)CrossRef

Auyang, S. Y. 1998. Foundations of Complex-System Theories in Economics, Evolutionary Biology, and Statistical Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Barham, J. 1996. A dynamical model of the meaning of information. BioSystems 38: 235–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Barham, J. 2000. Biofunctional realism and the problem of teleology. Evolution and Cognition 6: 2–34Google Scholar

Barham, J. 2002. Theses on Darwin. Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 95: 115–47Google Scholar PubMed

Barkai, N., and Leibler, S.. 1997. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387: 913–17CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Batterman, R. W. 2002. The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence. New York: Oxford University Press

Cao, T. Y. 1997. Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cao, T. Y. 1998. Monism, but not through reductionism. In Philosophies of Nature: The Human Dimension, ed. R. S. Cohen and A. I. Tauber, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 39–51

Dembski, W. A. 1998. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Denbigh, K. G. 1975. An Inventive Universe. New York: Braziller

Depew, D. J., and Weber, B. H.. 1998. What does natural selection have to be like in order to work with self-organization?Cybernetics and Human Knowing 5: 18–31Google Scholar

Eden, M. 1967. Inadequacies of neo-Darwinian evolution as a scientific theory. In Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution, ed. P. S. Moorhead and M. M. Kaplan. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press, pp. 5–19

Elsasser, W. M. 1998. Reflections on a Theory of Organisms. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Originally published in 1987.)

Flyvbjerg, H., P. Bak, M. H. Jensen, and K. Sneppen. 1995. A self-organized critical model for evolution. In Modelling the Dynamics of Biological Systems, ed. E. Mosekilde and O. G. Mouritsen. Berlin: Springer, pp. 269–88

Frauenfelder, H., Wolynes, P. G., and Austin, R. H.. 1999. Biological physics. Reviews of Modern Physics 71: S419–S430CrossRef Google Scholar

Fröhlich, F., and G. J. Hyland. 1995. Fröhlich coherence at the mind-brain interface. In Scale in Conscious Experience, ed. J. King and K. H. Pribram. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 407–38

Georgi, H. 1989. Effective quantum field theories. In The New Physics, ed. P. Davies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 446–57

Gordon, R. 1999. The Hierarchical Genome and Differentiation Waves. 2 vols. Singapore: World Scientific

Ho, M.-W. 1997. Towards a theory of the organism. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 32: 343–63CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ho, M.-W. 1998. The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms, 2nd ed. Singapore: World Scientific. (Originally published in 1993.)

Ho, M.-W., Haffegee, J., Newton, R., Zhou, Y.-M., Bolton, J. S., and Ross, S.. 1996. Organisms as polyphasic liquid crystals. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 41: 81–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Hochachka, P. W. 1999. The metabolic implications of intracellular circulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 96: 12233–9CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Icke, V. 1995. The Force of Symmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Jackson, R. C. 1993. The kinetic properties of switch antimetabolites. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85: 539–45CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jain, S., and Krishna, S.. 2001. A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 98: 543–7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabási, A.-L.. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407: 651–4Google Scholar PubMed

Jonas, H. 1982. The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Chicago: Phoenix Books/University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1966.)

Jonker, C. M., Snoep, J. L., Treur, J., Westerhoff, H. V., and Wijngaards, W. C. A.. 2002 Putting intentions into cell biochemistry: An artificial intelligence perspective. Journal of Theoretical Biology 214: 105–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press

Kirschner, M., Gerhart, J., and Mitchison, T.. 2000. Molecular “vitalism.”Cell 100: 17–88CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lauffenburger, D. A., and Horwitz, A. F.. 1996. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84: 359–69CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Laughlin, R. B., Lonzarich, G. G., Monthoux, P., and Pines, D.. 2001. The quantum criticality conundrum. Advances in Physics 50: 361–5CrossRef Google Scholar

Laughlin, R. B., and Pines, D.. 2000. The theory of everything. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97: 28–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Laughlin, R. B., Pines, D., Schmalian, J., Stojkovic, B. P., and Wolynes, P.. 2000. The middle way. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97: 32–7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Layzer, D. 1990. Cosmogenesis: The Growth of Order in the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press

Lecomte du Noüy, P. 1948. The Road to Reason. New York: Longmans, Green. (Originally published as L'homme devant la science. Paris: Flammarion, 1939.)

Li, K.-H. 1992. Coherence in physics and biology. In Recent Advances in Biophoton Research and Its Applications, ed. F.-A. Popp, K.-H. Li, and Q. Gu. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 113–55

Loewenstein, W. R. 1999. The Touchstone of Life: Molecular Information, Cell Communication, and the Foundations of Life. New York: Oxford University Press

Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Millikan, R. G. 1998. In defense of proper functions. In Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, ed. C. Allen, M. Bekoff, and G. Lauder. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press, pp. 295–312. (Originally published in Philosophy of Science, 56 (1989): 288–302.)

Monod, J. 1972. Chance and Necessity. New York: Vintage. (Originally published as Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1970.)

Moreno Bergareche, A., and Ruiz-Mirazo, K.. 1999. Metabolism and the problem of its universalization. BioSystems 49: 45–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Nagel, E. 1998. Teleology revisited. In Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, ed. C. Allen, M. Bekoff, and G. Lauder. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press, pp. 197–240. (Originally published in Journal of Philosophy 76 (1977): 261–301.)

New, M. H., and Pohorille, A.. 2000. An inherited efficiencies model of non-genomic evolution. Simulation Practice and Theory 8: 99–108CrossRef Google Scholar

Pattee, H. H. 1982. Cell psychology: An evolutionary approach to the symbol-matter problem. Cognition and Brain Theory 5: 325–41Google Scholar

Pattee, H. H. 2001. The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut. BioSystems 60: 5–21CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Petty, H. R., and Kindzelskii, A. L.. 2001. Dissipative metabolic patterns respond during neutrophil transmembrane signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 3145–9CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Polanyi, M. 1969. Life's irreducible structure. In his Knowing and Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 225–39. (Originally published in Science 160 (1968): 1308–12.)

Pollack, G. H. 2001. Cells, Gels and the Engines of Life. Seattle, WA: Ebner and Sons

Ravasz, E., Somera, A. L., Mongru, D. A., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabási, A.-L.. 2002 Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297: 1551–5CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rosen, R. 1991. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press

Schoffeniels, E. 1976. Anti-Chance. Oxford: Pergamon. (Originally published as L'anti-hasard, 2nd ed. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1975.)

Schrödinger, E. 1992. What is life? In his What Is Life? with Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–90. (Originally published in 1944.)

Schweber, S. S. 1997. The metaphysics of science at the end of a heroic age. In Experimental Metaphysics, ed. R. S. Cohen, M. Horne, and J. Stachel. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 171–98

Segré, D., Ben-Eli, D., and Lancet, D.. 2000. Compositional genomes: Prebiotic information transfer in mutually catalytic noncovalent assemblies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97: 4112–17CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Srere, P. A. 1994. Complexities of metabolic regulation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 19: 519–20CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Srere, P. A. 2000. Macromolecular interactions: Tracing the roots. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 25: 150–3CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Surrey, T., Nédélec, F., Liebler, S., and Karsenti, E.. 2001. Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science 292: 1167–71CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thirring, W. 1995. Do the laws of nature evolve? In What Is Life? The Next Fifty Years, ed. M. P. Murphy and L. A. J. O'Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–6

Unger, P. 2002. Free will and scientiphicalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 1–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Vitiello, G. 2001. My Double Unveiled: The Dissipative Quantum Model of Brain. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Walleczek, J. (ed.) 2000. Self-Organized Biological Dynamics and Nonlinear Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Watterson, J. G. 1997. The pressure pixel – unit of life?BioSystems 41: 141–52CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Whitesides, G. M., and Grzybowski, B.. 2002. Self-assembly at all scales. Science 295: 2418–21CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wright, L. 1998. Functions. In Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, ed. C. Allen, M. Bekoff, and G. Lauder, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press, pp. 51–78. (Originally published in Philosophical Review 82 (1973): 139–68.)

Wu, T.-M. 1994. Fröhlich's theory of coherent excitation – a retrospective. In Bioelectrodynamics and Biocommunication, ed. M.-W. Ho, F.-A. Popp, and U. Warnke. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 387–409

Yates, F. E. 1994. Order and complexity in dynamical systems: Homeodynamics as a generalized mechanics for biology. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 19: 49–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Yi, T.-M., Huang, Y., Simon, M. I., and Doyle, J.. 2000. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97: 4649–53CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yockey, H. P. 1992. Information Theory and Molecular Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Zhou, T., Carlson, J. M., and Doyle, J.. 2002. Mutation, specialization, and hypersensitivity in highly optimized tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 99: 2049–54CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed