Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:33:59.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Day Fines in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Michael Faure
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

As in other areas of social engineering, Sweden is considered as world-leading in creating systems that address social inequality. One of the cases in point is the Swedish day-fine system which has been considered as pioneering by systematically considering both the wealth of the offender and the seriousness of the offence when imposing the penalty. This chapter analyses in detail the Swedish day-fine system. The case study of Sweden sheds light on the pros and cons of day-fines by recalling the discussion in Sweden prior to introducing the system and the recent academic debates on extending the use of day-fines. The chapter also offers an account of the comprehensive prosecutorial guidelines as well as an analysis of the relevant case law, particularly in relation to adjustment of day-fines. The chapter argues that the Swedish day-fine system overall must be considered as a largely successful project which holds high esteem among courts and practitioners. The common view is that it is a merit of the system that it forces the courts to consider the economic circumstances of the accused and to articulate openly for the way in which such consideration has been done.

Type
Chapter
Information
Day Fines in Europe
Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems
, pp. 44 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åklagarmyndigheten, ‘Strafföreläggande i bötesmål – en sammanställning av tillämpade påföljder’, RättsPM 2012: 7.Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. 2000. ‘Is the Criminal Law a Lost Cause’, Law Quarterly Review 116: 225–56.Google Scholar
Aspelin, E. 1973. ‘Böter i stället för frihetsstraff’, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab 66: 5372.Google Scholar
Aspelin, E. 1999. ‘Straffets grunder – historisk bakgrund’, Svensk Juristtidning 84:, 108–31.Google Scholar
Bäcklund, A. 2003. ‘Böter som alternativ och komplement till andra påföljder – praktiska frågor’, Svensk Juristtidning, 264–78.Google Scholar
Becker, G. 1968. ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1830. The Rationale of Punishment. London: Robert Heward.Google Scholar
Bergh, A. 2011. The Rise, Fall and Revival of the Swedish Welfare State: What are the Policy Lessons from Sweden?, IFN Working Paper No. 87.Google Scholar
Borgeke, M. and Heidenborg, M. 2016. Att bestämma påföljd för brott. Stockholm: Jure.Google Scholar
Borgeke, M., Månsson, C. and Sterzel, G. 2013. Studier rörande påföljdspraxis med mera. Stockholm: Jure.Google Scholar
Rådet, Brottsförebyggande. 2019. ‘Kriminalstatistik 2018 – Personer Lagförda för Brott, Slutlig statistik’ (Brottsförebyggande rådet).Google Scholar
CoffeeJr, J. C. 1980. ‘Corporate Crime and Punishment: A Non-Chicago View of the Economics of Criminal Sanctions’, American Criminal Law Review 17: 419–76.Google Scholar
CoffeeJr, J. C. 1981. ‘No Soul To Damn – No Body To Kick – An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment’, Michigan Law Review 79: 386459.Google Scholar
Edebalk, P. G. 2000. ‘Emergence of a Welfare State – Social Insurance in Sweden in the 1910s’, Journal of Social Policy 29: 537–51.Google Scholar
Ekelöf, P. O., Edelstam, H. and Pauli, M. 2011. Rättegång V. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.Google Scholar
Eriksson, L. and Goodin, R. E. 2007. ‘The Measuring Rod of Time: The Example of Swedish Day‐fines’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 24–2: 125–36.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2019. Your social security rights in Sweden.Google Scholar
Försäkringskassan. 2019. Aktuella belopp.Google Scholar
Hessmark, L. G. et al. 2015. Socialförsäkringsbalk: en kommentar Avd. A-C och Avd. D-H. Stockholm: Norsteds Juridik.Google Scholar
Hillsman, S. T. 1990. ‘Fines and Day Fines’, Crime and Justice 12: 4998.Google Scholar
Hristova, M. V. 2012. ‘The Case for Insider-Trading Criminalization and Sentencing Reform’, Tennessee Journal of Business Law 13: 267308.Google Scholar
Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R. and Gilbert, J. A. 2008. ‘Formally Shaming White-Collar Criminals’, Business Horizons 51: 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jareborg, N. 2003. ‘Böter i stället för fängelse?’, Svensk Juristtidning 231–42.Google Scholar
Jareborg, N. and Zila, J. 2014. Straffrättens påföljdslära. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. 1996. ‘What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?’, University of Chicago Law Review 63: 591653.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E. 2018. ‘Day Fines: Reviving the Idea and Reversing the Costly Punitive Trend’, American Criminal Law Review 55: 333–72.Google Scholar
Kraakman, R. H. 1983–4. ‘Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’, Yale Law Journal 93: 857900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kungliga Maj;ts Proposition till riksdagen med förslag till lag om ändring av vissa delar av strafflagen m.m, Prop 1931:188.Google Scholar
Mann, K., Wheeler, S. and Sarat, A. 1980. ‘Sentencing the White-Collar Offender’, American Criminal Law Review 17: 479500.Google Scholar
McDermott, M. F. 1982. ‘Occupational Disqualification of Corporate Executives: An Innovative Condition of Probation’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73: 604–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öberg, J. 2011. ‘Criminal Sanctions in the Field of EU Environmental Law’, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2: 402–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öberg, J. 2014. ‘Is it “Essential” to Imprison Insider Dealers to Enforce Insider Dealing Laws?’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 14: 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palme, J., Fritzell, J. and Bergmark, Å. 2008. ‘End of Equality? The Welfare State Model Beyond the Crisis’, in Framtider, Institute for Future Studies, International edition, 4–12.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R. 2010. ‘How Much Do We Really Know about Criminal Deterrence?’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100: 765824.Google Scholar
Posner, R. 1980. ‘Optimal Sentences for White-Collar Criminals’, American Criminal Law Review 17: 409–18.Google Scholar
Ryberg-Welander, L. 2018. Socialförsäkringsrätt: om ersättning vid sjukdom. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.Google Scholar
Spagnolo, G. 2012. ‘Saving the Banks, But Not Reckless Bankers’, Vox.Google Scholar
Stone, C. D. 1980. ‘The Place of Enterprise Liability in the Control of Corporate Conduct’, Yale Law Journal 90: 1–77.Google Scholar
Strahl, I. 1951. ‘Något om böter’, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab 39, 203–24.Google Scholar
Svensson, B. 1981. ‘Gammalt straffsystem’, Svensk Juristtidning, 608–14.Google Scholar
The Swedish Penal Code.Google Scholar
The Swedish Procedural Code.Google Scholar
Thornstedt, H. 1975. ‘The Day Fine System in Sweden’, Criminal Law Review June: 307–12.Google Scholar
Thyrén, J. C. N. 1912. Principerna för en strafflagsreform I. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Thyrén, J. C. N. 1927. ‘Om Bötesstraffets Reformering’, Svensk Juristtidning, 353–63.Google Scholar
Ulväng, M. 2003. ‘Böter i stället för fängelse? Några anteckningar i anslutning till Nils Jareborgs uppsats’, Svensk Juristtidning 243–63.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×