Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:36:37.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Common Representations of Multimedia Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

K. Selçuk Candan
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Maria Luisa Sapino
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
Get access

Summary

Most features can be represented in the form of one (or more) of the four common base models: vectors, strings, graphs/trees, and fuzzy/probabilistic logic-based representations.

Many features, such as colors, textures, and shapes, are commonly represented in the form of histograms that quantify the contribution of each individual property (or feature instance) to themedia object.Given n different properties of interest, the vector model associates an n-dimensional feature vector space, where the ith dimension corresponds to the ith property. Thus, each vector describes the composition of a given multimedia data object in terms of its quantifiable properties.

Strings, on the other hand, are commonly used for representing media of sequential (or temporal) nature, when the ordinal relationships between events are more important than the quantitative differences between their occurrences. As we have seen in Section 2.3.6.4, because of their simplicity, string-based models are also used as less complex representations for more complex features, such as the spatial distributions of points of interest.

Graphs and trees are used for representing complex media, composed of other smaller objects/events that cannot be ordered to form sequences. Such media include hierarchical data, such as taxonomies and X3D worlds (which are easily represented as trees), and directed/undirected networks, such as hypermedia and social networks (where the edges of the graph represent explicit or implicit relationships between media objects or individuals).

When vectors, strings, trees, or graphs are not sufficient to represent the underlying imprecision of the data, fuzzy or probabilistic models can be used to deal with this complexity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×