Book contents
- Darwin Mythology
- Darwin Mythology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Myths and Darwin
- Myth 1 That Myths Are Simple Falsehoods
- Myth 2 That Most European Naturalists Before Darwin Did Not Think That Species Change Was Possible
- Myth 3 That Charles Darwin Was Not Directly Influenced by the Evolutionary Views of His Grandfather Erasmus
- Myth 4 That Darwin Always Rejected the Argument from Design in Nature and Developed His Own Theory to Replace It
- Myth 5 That Darwin Converted to Evolutionary Theory During His Historic Galápagos Islands Visit
- Myth 6 That Darwin’s Galápagos Finches Inspired His Most Important Evolutionary Insights
- Myth 7 That Darwin Was a Recluse, and a Theoretician Rather Than a Practical Scientist
- Myth 8 That Darwin Rejected Lamarck’s Ideas of Use and Disuse and of the Inheritance of Acquired Traits
- Myth 9 That Darwin’s Theory Was Essentially Complete Once He Came Up with the Idea of Natural Selection
- Myth 10 That Darwin Delayed the Publication of His Theory for Twenty Years, Being Afraid of the Reactions It Would Cause
- Myth 11 That Wallace’s and Darwin’s Theories Were the Same, and That Darwin Did Not Reveal Wallace’s 1858 Letter and Theory Until He Ensured His Own Priority
- Myth 12 That Huxley Was Darwin’s Bulldog and Accepted All Aspects of His Theory
- Myth 13 That Huxley Defeated Wilberforce, and Ridiculed His Obscurantism, in the 1860 Oxford Debate
- Myth 14 That Darwin’s Critics Such as Owen Were Prejudiced and Had No Scientific Arguments
- Myth 15 That Natural Selection Can Also Be Accurately Described As the Survival of the Fittest
- Myth 16 That Darwin Banished Teleology from Biology
- Myth 17 That Darwin’s Success Depended on Undermining “Aristotelian Essentialism”
- Myth 18 That Darwin’s Theory Would Have Become More Widely Accepted Immediately Had He Read Mendel’s 1866 Paper
- Myth 19 That Darwin Faced a Conspiracy of Silence in Lamarck’s Country
- Myth 20 That Hitler Endorsed and Was Influenced by Darwin’s Theory
- Myth 21 That Sexual Selection Was Darwin’s Afterthought to Natural Selection
- Myth 22 That Darwin’s Hatred of Slavery Reflected His Beliefs in Racial Equality
- Myth 23 That the Discovery of Australopithecus in 1925 Belatedly Confirmed Darwin’s 1871 Scientific Prediction of African Human Origins
- Myth 24 That Darwin’s Theory Brought an Instant and Immediate Revolution in the Life Sciences
- Conclusion: What Inferences About Science Can We Draw from Charles Darwin’s Life and Work?
- Further Reading
- Index
Myth 19 - That Darwin Faced a Conspiracy of Silence in Lamarck’s Country
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2024
- Darwin Mythology
- Darwin Mythology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Myths and Darwin
- Myth 1 That Myths Are Simple Falsehoods
- Myth 2 That Most European Naturalists Before Darwin Did Not Think That Species Change Was Possible
- Myth 3 That Charles Darwin Was Not Directly Influenced by the Evolutionary Views of His Grandfather Erasmus
- Myth 4 That Darwin Always Rejected the Argument from Design in Nature and Developed His Own Theory to Replace It
- Myth 5 That Darwin Converted to Evolutionary Theory During His Historic Galápagos Islands Visit
- Myth 6 That Darwin’s Galápagos Finches Inspired His Most Important Evolutionary Insights
- Myth 7 That Darwin Was a Recluse, and a Theoretician Rather Than a Practical Scientist
- Myth 8 That Darwin Rejected Lamarck’s Ideas of Use and Disuse and of the Inheritance of Acquired Traits
- Myth 9 That Darwin’s Theory Was Essentially Complete Once He Came Up with the Idea of Natural Selection
- Myth 10 That Darwin Delayed the Publication of His Theory for Twenty Years, Being Afraid of the Reactions It Would Cause
- Myth 11 That Wallace’s and Darwin’s Theories Were the Same, and That Darwin Did Not Reveal Wallace’s 1858 Letter and Theory Until He Ensured His Own Priority
- Myth 12 That Huxley Was Darwin’s Bulldog and Accepted All Aspects of His Theory
- Myth 13 That Huxley Defeated Wilberforce, and Ridiculed His Obscurantism, in the 1860 Oxford Debate
- Myth 14 That Darwin’s Critics Such as Owen Were Prejudiced and Had No Scientific Arguments
- Myth 15 That Natural Selection Can Also Be Accurately Described As the Survival of the Fittest
- Myth 16 That Darwin Banished Teleology from Biology
- Myth 17 That Darwin’s Success Depended on Undermining “Aristotelian Essentialism”
- Myth 18 That Darwin’s Theory Would Have Become More Widely Accepted Immediately Had He Read Mendel’s 1866 Paper
- Myth 19 That Darwin Faced a Conspiracy of Silence in Lamarck’s Country
- Myth 20 That Hitler Endorsed and Was Influenced by Darwin’s Theory
- Myth 21 That Sexual Selection Was Darwin’s Afterthought to Natural Selection
- Myth 22 That Darwin’s Hatred of Slavery Reflected His Beliefs in Racial Equality
- Myth 23 That the Discovery of Australopithecus in 1925 Belatedly Confirmed Darwin’s 1871 Scientific Prediction of African Human Origins
- Myth 24 That Darwin’s Theory Brought an Instant and Immediate Revolution in the Life Sciences
- Conclusion: What Inferences About Science Can We Draw from Charles Darwin’s Life and Work?
- Further Reading
- Index
Summary
Why should we care about the reception of Darwin in France? We should care because it’s a fascinating case study of how science can sometimes take an unexpected path as it circulates through a society. The myth of the “conspiracy of silence” was born in the 1860s out of a seeming paradox. Although France was one of the first countries to support transformist theories, it was one of the last in Europe to recognize Darwin’s theory. The myth spread in the 1870s, when Darwin experienced his first rejection at the Academy of Sciences in Paris. According to this myth, not only did the French remain silent on Darwin’s thesis, but there was a conspiracy to nip in the bud any attempt to discuss evolution. In fact, while the debate was largely thwarted in elite scientific institutions, it was growing among the educated public. Public discussion was crucial to the spread of Darwin’s theory, even before the scientific establishment had embraced it. The introduction of Darwinism in France was not a failure. It simply took unusual paths. Indeed, it is usually assumed that the circulation of theories is top-down, that is, from scientific elites to the masses. Through the case of the circulation of Darwinism in France, this chapter aims to show a different pattern, one that restores to the public its role in the diffusion of scientific theories.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Darwin MythologyDebunking Myths, Correcting Falsehoods, pp. 216 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024