The Innovation Dilemma: Some Risks of Creativity in Strategic Agency

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761225.006

6 - The Innovation Dilemma: Some Risks of Creativity in Strategic Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Edited by

James C. Kaufman and

James M. Jasper: Affiliation:
CUNY Graduate Center
David H. Cropley: Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Arthur J. Cropley: Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
Mark A. Runco: Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Ipse docet quid agam; fas est et ab hoste doceri [The enemy himself teaches me what to do; it is good to be taught by him].

Ovid

The study of strategic interaction, in which players hope to influence the actions, beliefs, and feelings of others, has long been dominated by game theory. As a branch of mathematics, and a mostly normative one at that, game theory has had enthusiasts, but most social scientists have rejected or ignored it. Sociologists in particular have dismissed it without even knowing much about it. As a result, they have rejected the study of strategy altogether. Since sociology is my main discipline, since I see both insight and limitations to game theory, and since I believe that strategy is central to a great deal of social life, I have tried hard to develop a softer alternative to game theory (Jasper, 2004, 2006). This entails a fuller, more realistic recognition of emotions, cognition, and social context. And one of my hopes in doing this work has been to better understand the creativity of social action, especially the creativity found in social movements (Jasper, 1997).

In strategic settings, creativity has several characteristics that may not hold elsewhere. For one, it arises out of interaction as players act and react to one another; we must lay aside the popular image of the creative genius who first imagines new possibilities and only then presents or promulgates them.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Dark Side of Creativity , pp. 91 - 113

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761225.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassford, Christopher. (1994). Clausewitz in English: The reception of Clausewitz in Britain and America, 1815–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biddle, Tami Davis. (2002). Rhetoric and reality in air warfare. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Boot, Max. (2006). War made new: Weapons, warriors, and the making of the modern world. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

Cohn, Steven Mark. (1997). Too cheap to meter: An economic and philosophical analysis of the nuclear dream. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Corum, James S. (1997). The Luftwaffe. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent. (1998). Rationality and power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Ganz, Marshall. (2009). Why David sometimes wins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hertsgaard, Mark. (1983). Nuclear Inc. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Hertz, John. (1951). Political realism and political idealism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger H. (2001). The battlefleet revolution, 1885–1914. In MacGregor Knox and Murray, Williamson (Eds.), The dynamics of military revolution 1300–2050 (pp. 114–131). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jasper, James M. (1990). Nuclear politics: Energy and the state in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jasper, James M. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jasper, James M. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social movement choices. Mobilization, 9, 1–116.Google Scholar

Jasper, James M. (2006). Getting your way: Strategic dilemmas in real life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jasper, James M. & Young, Michael. (2006). Political character types. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, August.

Jervis, Robert. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30, 167–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lukacs, John. (1990). The duel: The eighty-day struggle between Churchill and Hitler. London: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar

Macksey, Kenneth. (1990). Invasion: The German invasion of England, July 1940. London: Greenhill Books.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. (2004). Fascists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

March, James. (1994). A primer on decision making. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell., & MacKuen, Michael. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Donald L. (2006). Masters of the air. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R. (1996). Patterns of military innovation in the interwar period. In Murray, Williamson and Millett, Allan R. (Eds.), Military innovation in the interwar period (pp. 329–368). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Overy, Richard. (2001). The Battle of Britain: The myth and the reality. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Piven, Frances Fox. (2006). Challenging authority: How ordinary people change America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Pringle, Peter & Spigelman, James. 1981. The nuclear barons. New York: Avon.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. Keith. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Ronald. (1985). Wings of judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, Arthur. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March, James G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, Arthur. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Suleiman, Ezra. (1978). Elites in French society: The politics of survival. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, J. Samuel. (1992). Containing the atom: Nuclear regulation in a changing environment, 1963–1971. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weick, Karl E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar