Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:46:02.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Current Aspects of Practice in CLIL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2020

Edited by
Kim Bower ,
Do Coyle ,
Russell Cross  and
Gary N. Chambers
Kim Bower
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Do Coyle
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Russell Cross
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Gary N. Chambers
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Curriculum Integrated Language Teaching
CLIL in Practice
 , pp. 61 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bloyce, J., and Frederickson, N. (2012). ‘Intervening to Improve the Transfer to Secondary School’. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board, K., and Tinsley, T. (2015). Language Trends 2015/16: The State of Language Learning in Primary and Secondary Schools in England. Reading, UK: British Council, Education Development Trust.Google Scholar
Bolster, A. (2009). ‘Continuity or a Fresh Start? A Case Study of Motivation in MFL at Transition, KS2–3’. Language Learning Journal, 37(2), 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A., Morris-Adams, M., Garton, S., and Copland, F. (2013). Key Factors and Challenges in Transition from Primary to Secondary Schooling in ELT: An International Perspective. ELT Research Papers 13–08. London, UK: British Council.Google Scholar
Burstall, C., Jamieson, M., Cohen, S., and Hargreaves, M. (1974). Primary French in the Balance. Windsor, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.Google Scholar
Cable, C., Heins, B., Driscoll, P., Mitchell, R., and Hall, K. (2010). Language Learning at Key Stage 2: A Longitudinal Study – Interim Findings from the First Year. London, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
Carreira, J. M. (2012). ‘Motivational Orientations and Psychological Needs in EFL Learning among Elementary School Students in Japan’. System, 40(2), 191–202.Google Scholar
Chambers, G. N. (2014). ‘Transition in Modern Languages from Primary to Secondary School: The Challenge of Change’. Language Learning Journal, 42(3), 242–260.Google Scholar
Chambers, G. N. (2016a). ‘Modern Languages Transition from Primary to Secondary School: the German Pupils’ Voice’. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 7(2), 2284–2294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, G. N. (2016b). ‘Pupils’ Perceptions of Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3 Transition in Modern Foreign Languages’. Language Learning Journal. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09571736.2016.1172331 (accessed 8 June 2018).Google Scholar
Chambers, G. N. (2018). “Pupils’ Reflections on the Primary to Secondary School Transition with Reference to Modern Language Learning: A Motivational Self-System Perspective” in Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1424172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, G. N. (2019). ‘Pupils’ Perceptions of Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3 Transition in Modern Foreign Languages’. Language Learning Journal, 47(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chick, N., and Meleis, A. I. (1986). ‘Transitions: A Nursing Concern’. Scholarly Commons. http://repository.upenn.edu/nrs/9 (accessed 27 September 2018).Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2011). ‘European Language Portfolio’. www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/elp/ (accessed 20 January 2014).Google Scholar
Dearing, R., and King, L. (2007). Languages Review. London, UK: Department for Education and Skills. www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11124 (accessed 27 September 2018).Google Scholar
Demetriou, H., Goalen, P., and Rudduck, J. (2000). ‘Academic Performance, Transfer, Transition and Friendship: Listening to the Student Voice’. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(4), 425–441.Google Scholar
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2007). The Languages Ladder. London, UK: DCSF Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2013). ‘2014 National Curriculum’. www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum (accessed 20 January 2014).Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills. (2002). Languages for All: Languages for Life – A Strategy for England. Nottingham, UK: DfES Publications.Google Scholar
Djigunovic´, J. (2012). ‘Attitudes and Motivation in Early Foreign Language Learning’. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(2), 55–74. https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/347 (accessed 8 October 2018).Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., and Henry, A. (2015). Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Drew, I., Oostdam, R., and van Toorenburg, H. (2007). ‘Teachers’ Experiences and Perceptions of Primary EFL in Norway and the Netherlands: A Comparative Study’. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, P., Jones, J., and Macrory, G. (2004). The Provision of Foreign Language Learning for Pupils at Key Stage 2. Research Report No. 572. Canterbury, UK: Canterbury Christ Church University College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2018). ‘Growth’. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor/base-profile/saxony-anhalt (accessed 5 October 2018).Google Scholar
Flutter, J., and Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting Pupils: What’s in It for Schools? London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayton, A. M. (2018). ‘A Context-Specific Approach to L2 Motivation in Anglophone Settings: A First Step towards Theory Development’. Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 384–397.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Marinis, T., Tonkyn, A., and Courtney, L. (2014). Primary Modern Languages: The Impact of Teaching Approaches on Attainment and Preparedness for Secondary School Language Learning. Final Report. University of Reading, London, UK: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
Greig, A. D., Taylor, J., and MacKay, T. (2012). Doing Research with Children: A Practical Guide. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Hunt, M., Barnes, A., Powell, R., and Martin, C. (2008). ‘Moving On: The Challenges for Foreign Language Learning on Transition from Primary to Secondary School’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 915–926.Google Scholar
Ioannou-Georgiou, S., and Pavlou, P. (eds.). (2011). ‘Guidelines for CLIL Implementation in Primary and Pre-primary Education’. Pro-CLIL, Socrates-Comenius. http://arbeitsplattform.bildung.hessen.de/fach/bilingual/Magazin/mat_aufsaetze/clilimplementation.pdf (accessed 21 September 2018).Google Scholar
Jones, J., and Coffey, S. (2017). Modern Foreign Languages, 5–11: Issues for Teachers. 3rd ed. Abingdon, UK: David Fulton.Google Scholar
Kanno, Y. (2007). ‘ELT Policy Directions in Multilingual Japan’, in Cummins, J. and Davison, C. (eds.), International Handbook of English Language Teaching: Part 1. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
Kersten, K., and Rohde, A. (2013). ‘On the Road to Nowhere? The Transition Problem of Bilingual Teaching Programmes’, in Elsner, D. and Keβler, J.-U. (eds.), Bilingual Learning and CLIL in Primary School. Tűbingen, Germany: Narr, pp. 93–117.Google Scholar
Kwon, O. (2006). Impacts and Effects of Ten Years of Elementary School English Education in Korea: Report on East Asian High School English Education, a GTECH Report for the Year 2006. Tokyo, Japan: Benesse Corporation. http://benesse.jp/berd/center/open/report/eastasia_gtec/hon/pdf/data_08.pdf (accessed 25 September 2018).Google Scholar
Lanvers, U. (2017). ‘Contradictory Others and the Habitus of Languages: Surveying the L2 Motivation Landscape in the United Kingdom’. Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 517–532.Google Scholar
Lanvers, U., and Chambers, G. (in press). ‘In the Shadow of Global English? Comparing Language Learner Motivation in Germany and the United Kingdom’, in Lamb, M., Csizér, K., Henry, A., and Ryan, S. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
MAXQDA. (2010). http://www.MAXQDA.com (accessed 6 July 2015).Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. (2009). ‘Modern Languages in the Primary Curriculum: Are We Creating Conditions for Success?’ Language Learning Journal, 37(2), 183–204.Google Scholar
Mechan-Schmidt, F. (2005). ‘Primary Children Converse in Three Languages a Day’. Times Educational Supplement, 23 May. www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=2140071 (accessed 7 December 2013).Google Scholar
Mechan-Schmidt, F. (2009). ‘View from Here – You Can’t Play with Languages’. Times Educational Supplement, 29 August. www.tes.com/news/view-here-you-cant-play-languages (accessed 7 December 2013).Google Scholar
Nikolov, M. (ed.). (2009). The Age Factor and Early Language Learning. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2008). ‘Translingual English’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 30.1–30.9.Google Scholar
Quetz, J. (2010). ‘Auf dem Weg zur fremdsprachlichen Monokultur? Fremdsprachen an den Schulen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’. Sociolinguistica, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223323.170 (accessed 14 February 2017).Google Scholar
Rosa, M. M. (2010). ‘Continuity between Primary and Secondary EFL Teaching and Learning’, in Martinez, R. D. and Pen´amaria, S. S.-R. (eds.), Linguistics Tools for Teachers of English. Salamanca, Spain: University of Salamanca, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H., and Hauser, R. M. (1975). Occupation and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stotz, D., and Megías, R. M. (2010). ‘Moving On, Broadening Out: A European Perspective on the Transition between Primary and Secondary Foreign Language Learning’. Babylonia, 1(10), 30–34.Google Scholar
Swanson, D., Spencer, M., Harpalani, V., Dupree, D., Noll, E., Ginzburg, S., and Seaton, G. (2003). ‘Psychosocial Development in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Youth: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in the 21st Century’. Development and Psychopathology, 15(3), 743–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, T. (2018). ‘Languages in English Secondary Schools Post-Brexit’, in Kelly, M. (ed.), Languages after Brexit. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 127–136.Google Scholar
Tinsley, T., and Doležal, N. (2019). Language Trends 2018. London, UK: British Council. www.britishcouncil.org/research-policy-insight/research-reports/language-trends-2018 (accessed 15 February 2019).Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2003). ‘Motivation as a Socially Mediated Process’, in Little, D., Ridley, J., and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik, pp. 90–102.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2006). ‘Language Motivation in a Reconfigured Europe: Access, Identity, Autonomy’. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(2), 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2009). ‘A Person-in-Context Relational View of Emergent Motivation, Self and Identity’, in Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, Language and Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 215–228.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (2009). School-Based Research: A Guide for Education Students. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Zentner, M., and Renaud, O. (2007). ‘Origins of Adolescents’ Ideal Self: An Intergenerational Perspective’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 557–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

ACT Department of Education. (2007). ACT Educational Leadership Framework. Canberra, Australia: ACT Department of Education.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Apple, M. (1981) Ideology and Curriculum. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of Bilingual Education (5th ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ball, S. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neo-liberal Imaginary. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J. A. (2004). ‘Multicultural Education: Historical Development, Dimensions, and Practice’, in Banks, J. A. and Banks, C. A. M. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2014). Social Class in Applied Linguistics. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, K. D., Koreinik, K., and Siiner, M. (2017). ‘Introductory Chapter: Questioning Borders’, in Brown, K. D., Koreinik, K., and Siiner, M. (eds.), Language Policy beyond the State. Language Policy, vol. 14. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Cole, D. R., and Woodrow, C. (eds.). (2016). Super Dimensions in Globalisation and Education. Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education 5. Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. (1983). Australian Treaty Series 1983 No. 8. Agreement between the Governments of Australia and the Government of the French Republic concerning the Establishment of a French-Australian School in Canberra. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Collard, J., and Noremore, A. (2009). Leadership and Intercultural Dynamics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2007). ‘Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.Google Scholar
Department of Education Science and Training. (2005). Australian Government Quality Teacher Program: Getting Started with Intercultural Language Learning – a Resource for Schools. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
Devlin, B. C., Disbray, S., and Devlin, N. R. F. (eds.). (2017). History of Bilingual Education in the Northern Territory. People, Programs and Policies. Language Policy, vol. 12. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual Education in the 21st Century. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
GEMS Education. (2018). ‘Dual & Local Curricula: The Best of Both Worlds’. www.gemseducation.com/organisation/about-us/our-company/ (accessed 16 February 2020).Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., and Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and Transnational Literacies in Multilingual Classrooms: A Biliteracy Lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, F. M. (2014). ‘How Does Policy Influence Language in Education?’, in Silver, R. E., and Lwin, S. M. (eds.), Language in Education: Social Implications. London, UK: Continuum, pp. 159–175.Google Scholar
Hult, F. M., and Hornberger, N. (2016). ‘Revisiting Orientations in Language Planning: Problem, Right, and Resource as an Analytical Heuristic’. Bilingual Review, 33(3), 30–49.Google Scholar
Langford, M. (2001). ‘Global Nomads, Third Culture Kids and International Schools’, in Hayden, M. and Thompson, J. (eds.), International Education: Principles and Practice. London, UK: Kogan Page, pp. 28–43.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. (2009). ‘Introduction: Culture, Education & Content and Language Integrated Learning’, in Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (ed.), Content and Language Integrated Learning: Cultural Diversity. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
McNelly, C. (2015). ‘Language Learning Policy through the Lens of Language as a Problem, as a Right, and as a Resource’. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 6, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, B. (1999). ‘The Story behind Telopea Park’s Emergence as a Bi-national School’. Canberra Historical Journal, 43, 2–8.Google Scholar
Ruiz, R. (1984). ‘Orientations in Language Planning’. NABE Journal, 8, 15–34.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic Genocide in Education – Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smala, S. (2013). ‘Contexts and Agents: CLIL in Queensland’, in May, S. (ed.), Refereed Conference Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language, Education and Diversity 2011. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Smala, S. (2014). ‘Sole Fighter Mentality: Stakeholder Agency in CLIL Programmes in Queensland’. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 195–208.Google Scholar
Smala, S. (2016). ‘CLIL in Queensland: The Evolution of “Immersion”’. Babel: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers’ Associations, 50(2/3), 20–27.Google Scholar
Smala, S. (2018). ‘Bilingual Immersion Education Network, 3 Australia: Various Bilingual Models’. http://ssis.exeter.ac.uk/bien/page.php?id=24 (accessed 15 March 2019).Google Scholar
Smala, S., Bergaz Paz, J., and Lingard, B. (2013). ‘Languages, Cultural Capital and School Choice: Distinction and Second Language Immersion Programs’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 373–391.Google Scholar
Smala, S., and Sutherland, K. (2011). ‘A Lived Curriculum in Two Languages’. Curriculum Perspectives, 31(3), 11–22.Google Scholar
Sudhoff, J. (2010). ‘CLIL and Intercultural Communicative Competence: Foundations and Approaches towards a Fusion’. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 30–37.Google Scholar
Telopea Park School Lycée Franco-Australian de Canberra. (2010). Telopea Park School Lycée Franco-Australian de Canberra K-6 Harmonised Curriculum. Telopea Park School Lycée Franco-Australian de Canberra.Google Scholar
Telopea Park School, Lycée Franco-Australien de Canberra. (2018). ‘Primary: The Harmonised K-6 Curriculum’. www.telopea.act.edu.au/curriculum/primary (accessed 15 March 2019).Google Scholar
United Nations. (2017). ‘International Migration Report: Highlights’. www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2017_Highlights.pdf (accessed 15 June 2019).Google Scholar
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2007). ‘Super-diversity and Its Implications’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wellers Hill Bilingual Programme. (2017). ‘Wellers Hill State School Japanese Bilingual Programme 2017 (Updated). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0koPDC7QdQ (accessed 15 March 2019).Google Scholar
Wellers Hill State School. (2017). ‘Welcome to Wellers Hill State School’. https://wellhillss.eq.edu.au/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 15 March 2019).Google Scholar

References

Baker, C., and Wright, W. E. (2017). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2017). The Education Debate. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bauckham, I. (2016). Modern Foreign Languages Pedagogy Review: A Review of Modern Foreign Languages Teaching Practice in Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4. London, UK: Teaching Schools Council.Google Scholar
Bower, K. (2006). An Analysis of Pupils’ and Teachers’ Views on the Use of ‘Immersion’ Techniques in the Teaching of Modern Foreign Languages at One Secondary School. Hull, UK: University of Hull.Google Scholar
Bower, K. (2014). To What Extent Does Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as a Language-Based Project Approach Promote Pupil Motivation in the Teaching of MFL in Three Secondary Schools in England? Hull, UK: University of Hull.Google Scholar
Bower, K. (2017). ‘“Speaking French Alive”: Learner Perspectives on Their Motivation in Content and Language Integrated Learning in England’. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
Bower, K. (2019). ‘School Leaders’ Perspectives on Content and Language Integrated Learning in England’. Language, Culture and Curriculum. doi:10.1080/07908318.2019.1667367.Google Scholar
Breidbach, S., and Viebrock, B. (2012). ‘CLIL in Germany: Results from Recent Research in a Contested Field of Education’. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 5–16.Google Scholar
Cedar School. (2013). ‘Cedar School Prospectus’.Google Scholar
Coyle, C., Holmes, B., and King, L. (2009). Towards an Integrated Curriculum: CLIL National Statement and Guidelines. London, UK: Languages Company.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2000). ‘Meeting the Challenge: Developing the 3Cs Curriculum’, in Green, S. (ed.), New Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Modern Languages. Modern Languages in Practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 158–182.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2011). ITALIC Research Report Investigating Student Gains: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Edinburgh, UK: University of Aberdeen, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2013). ‘Listening to Learners: An Investigation into “Successful Learning” across CLIL Contexts’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244–266.Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, H., and Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dearing, R., and King, L. (2007). The Languages Review. London, UK: DfES.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2010). The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper 2010. Norwich, UK: Department for Education, Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills. (2002). Languages for All: Languages for Life – a Strategy for England. London, UK: DfES.Google Scholar
Diocese, Cedar School. (2013). Denominational Inspection Report.Google Scholar
Eurydice. (2017). Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe – 2017 Edition. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice Report. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Greany, T., and Waterhouse, J. (2016). ‘Rebels against the System: Leadership Agency and Curriculum Innovation in the Context of School Autonomy and Accountability in England’ International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1188–1206.Google Scholar
Hagger-Vaughan, L. (2016). ‘Towards “Languages for All” in England: The State of the Debate’. Language Learning Journal, 44(3), 358–375.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. (2011). Leading a Self-improving School System. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D. (2003). ‘The Management of Learning, Schools and Systems’. Networks of Innovation. OECD.Google Scholar
Hunt, M. J. (2011). ‘UK Teachers’ and Learners’ Experiences of CLIL Resulting from the EU-Funded Project ECLILT’. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
Nuffield Foundation. (2000). Languages: The Next Generation: The Final Report and Recommendations of the Nuffield Languages Inquiry. London, UK: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
Ofsted. (1997). Ash School Inspection Report. London, UK: Crown.Google Scholar
Ofsted. (2010). Ash School Inspection Report. London, UK: Crown.Google Scholar
Ofsted. (2011). Beech School Inspection Report. Manchester, UK: Crown.Google Scholar
Ofsted. (2012). School Report Cedar School. Manchester, UK: Crown.Google Scholar
Ofsted. (2013). Ash School Inspection Report. Manchester, UK: Crown.Google Scholar
Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., and Braun, A. (2011). ‘Life in the Pressure Cooker–School League Tables and English and Mathematics Teachers’ Responses to Accountability in a Results-Driven Era’. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.Google Scholar
Spielman, A. (2017). Amanda Spielman on the Launch of Ofsted’s Annual Report 2016/17. London, UK: Ofsted.Google Scholar
Tedick, D. J., Christian, D., and Fortune, T. W. (2011). ‘The Future of Immersion Education: An Invitation to “Dwell in Possibility”’, in Tedick, D. J., Christian, D., and Fortune, T. W. (eds.), Immersion Education: Practices, Policies, Possibilities. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Tinsley, T., and Doležal, N. (2018). Language Trends 2018: Language Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools in England Survey Report. London, UK: British Council.Google Scholar
Tinsley, T., and Doležal, N. (2019). Language Trends 2019: Language Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools in England Survey Report. London, UK: British Council.Google Scholar
Van Mensel, L., Hiligsmann, P., Mettewie, L., and Galand, B. (2020). ‘CLIL, an Elitist Language Learning Approach? A Background Analysis of English and Dutch CLIL Pupils in French-Speaking Belgium’. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Wiesemes, R. (2005). The Final Report for the Content and Language Integrated Project. London, UK: CILT.Google Scholar

References

Australian Council of State School Organisations. (2007). Attitudes towards the Study of Languages in Australian Schools: The National Statement and Plan – Making a Difference or Another Decade of Indifference? Canberra, Australia: Australian Council of State School Organisations.Google Scholar
Baker, C., and Wright, W. E. (2017). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Breidbach, S., and Viebrock, B. (2012). ‘CLIL in Germany: Results from Recent Research in a Contested Field of Education’. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 5–16.Google Scholar
Byram, M., and Wagner, M. (2018). ‘Making a Difference: Language Teaching for Intercultural and International Dialogue’. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 140–151.Google Scholar
Caruso, M., and Brown, J. (2018). ‘Continuity in Foreign Language Education in Australia’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 280–310.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., and Gorter, D. (2014). ‘Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward’. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2005). ‘Keynote Address’. Presented at Seizing the Future: Biennial Conference of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers' Associations, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2006). ‘Developing CLIL: Towards a Theory of Practice’, in Figueras, N. (ed.), CLIL in Catalonia: From Theory to Practice. Barcelona, Spain: APAC, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2007). ‘Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2008). ‘CLIL: A Pedagogical Approach from the European Perspective’, in Van Deusen-Scholl, N. and Hornberger, N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 97–111.Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., and Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creese, A., and Blackledge, A. (2010). ‘Translanguaging in the Bilingual Classroom: A Pedagogy for Learning and Teaching?’ Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (2012). ‘Creative in Finding Creativity in the Curriculum: The CLIL Second Language Classroom’. Australian Educational Researcher, 39(4), 431–445.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (2015). ‘Defining Content and Language Integrated Learning for Languages Education in Australia’. Babel, 49(2), 4–15.Google Scholar
Cross, R., and Gearon, M. (2013). Research and Evaluation of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Approach to Teaching and Learning Languages in Victorian Schools. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, L., Van der Es, W., and Tanner, R. (2011). CLIL Skills. Leiden, the Netherlands: European Platform.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., and Nikula, T. (2014). ‘“You Can Stand under My Umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013)’. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., and Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate Methodology and Social Context. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzman, L. (2010). ‘Vygotsky and Creativity: A Cultural-Historical Approach to Play, Meaning Making, and the Arts’, in Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V., and Marjanovic-Shane, A. (eds.), Vygotsky and Creativity: A Cultural-Historical Approach to Play, Meaning Making, and the Arts. New York, NY: Peter Lang, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D. (2013). ‘The Use of the L1 in CLIL Classes: The Teachers’ Perspective’. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 6(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Linn, A. R., Bermel, N., and Ferguson, G. (2015). Attitudes towards English in Europe. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Llinares, A. (2015). ‘Integration in CLIL: A Proposal to Inform Research and Successful Pedagogy’. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., and Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). ‘The Role of Different Tasks in CLIL Students’ Use of Evaluative Language’. System, 54, 69–79.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., and Whittaker, R. (2012). The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., and Whittaker, R. (2010). ‘Writing and Speaking in the History Class: Data from CLIL and First Language Contexts’, in Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., and Smit, U. (eds.), Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 125–144.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, J. (2009). Second Languages and Australian Schooling. Melbourne, Australia: ACER.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE: The European Dimension – Action, Trends and Foresight Potential. Brussels, Belgium: European Union Public Services Contract.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., and García, A. L. (2013). ‘CLIL Classroom Discourse: Research from Europe’. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2012). Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
San Isidro, X., and Lasagabaster, D. (2019). ‘Code-switching in a CLIL Multilingual Setting: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study’. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(3), 336–356.Google Scholar
Scarino, A. (2014). ‘Situating the Challenges in Current Languages Education Policy in Australia: Unlearning Monolingualism’. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11(3), 289–306.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., and Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinnari, K., and Nikula, T. (2017). ‘Teachers’ Perceptions on the Changing Role of Language in the Curriculum’. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 223–244.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×