Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T11:23:06.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2020

Brandon L. Bartels  and
Christopher D. Johnston
Brandon L. Bartels
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Christopher D. Johnston
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Curbing the Court
Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence
 , pp. 279 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.Google Scholar
Acharya, Avidit, Blackwell, Matthew, and Sen, Maya. 2018. “Explaining Preferences from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach.” Journal of Politics 80(2): 400–11.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69(4): 1218–31.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M.. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102(2): 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armaly, Miles T. 2018. “Extra-Judicial Actor Induced Change in Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 71(3): 600–13.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex. 2016. “The Public’s Motivated Response to Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Justice System Journal 37(4): 318–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Michelle. 2018. Copycats and Contrarians: Why We Follow Others … and When We Don’t. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A., and Gangl, Amy. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media’s Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology 27(4): 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L. 2015. “The Sources and Consequences of Polarization in the U.S. Supreme Court.” In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, ed. Thurber, James A. and Yoshinaka, Antoine. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Johnston, Christopher D.. 2012. “Political Justice? Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preferences toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(1): 105–16.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Johnston, Christopher D. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 184–99.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., Johnston, Christopher D., and Mark, Alyx. 2015. “Lawyers’ Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court a ‘Political’ Institution?” Law & Society Review 49(3): 761–94.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2009. “Explaining Processes of Institutional Opinion Leadership.” The Journal of Politics 71(1): 249–61.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, and Vohs, Kathleen D.. 2001. “Bad Is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323–70.Google Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” Journal of Politics 68(3): 697–707.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, Martin, and Slothuus, Rune. 2018. “Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps.” American Journal of Political Science 62(2): 456–69.Google Scholar
Braman, Eileen. 2006. “Reasoning on the Threshold: Testing the Separability of Preferences in Legal Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics 68(2): 308–21.Google Scholar
Braman, Eileen.2009. Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Braman, Eileen, and Nelson, Thomas E.. 2007. “Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 940–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Mark J. et al. 2014. “The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance among Both Liberals and Conservatives.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 23(1): 27–34.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Lomasky, Loren. 1993. Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan S., Hill, Seth J., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2015. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10: 519–78.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2010. All Judges Are Political – Except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 635–64.Google Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Yates, Jeff. 2008. “Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens’ Diffuse Support for State Courts.” American Politics Research 36(2): 297–329.Google Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Yates, Jeff 2016. These Estimable Courts: Understanding Public Perceptions of State Judicial Institutions and Legal Policy-Making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74(1): 78–91.Google Scholar
Carpini, Michael X. Delli, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2009. “A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems.” Journal of Politics 71(1): 55–69.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., and Zorn, Christopher. 2010. “Executive Discretion, Judicial Decision Making, and Separation of Powers in the United States.” The Journal of Politics 72(3): 812–24.Google Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation.” Law & Society Review 8(3): 385–420.Google Scholar
Casillas, Christopher J., Enns, Peter K., and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 74–88.Google Scholar
Choper, Jesse H. 1980. Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and Glick, David M.. 2015a. “Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 403–18.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and Glick, David M. 2015b. “Issue-Specific Opinion Change: The Supreme Court and Health Care Reform.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79(4): 881–905.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and Glick, David M. 2019. “Reassessing the Supreme Court: How Decisions and Negativity Bias Affect Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 72(3): 637–52.Google Scholar
Cizmar, Anne M. et al. 2004. “Authoritarianism and American Political Behavior from 1952 to 2008.” Political Research Quarterly 67(1): 71–83.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 971–89.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Kastellec, Jonathan P.. 2015. “Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 43(3): 504–35.Google Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., Kegler, Elizabeth R., and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2001. “The Legitimacy-Conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court: An Experimental Design.” American Politics Research 29(6): 566–91.Google Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., Kegler, Elizabeth R., and Waltenburg, Eric N. 2003. “Supreme Court Legitimacy and Group-Centric Forces: Black Support for Capital Punishment and Affirmative Action.” Political Behavior 25(4): 289–311.Google Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2009. Legacy and Legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5): 808–22.Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jarret T., and Pilanski, Jane M.. 2014. “Political Intolerance, Right and Left.” Political Psychology 35(6): 841–51.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6(2): 279–95.Google Scholar
Ditto, Peter H., and Lopez, David F.. 1992. “Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4): 568–84.Google Scholar
Doty, Richard M., Peterson, Bill E., and Winter, David G.. 1991. “Threat and Authoritarianism in the United States, 1978–1987.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(4): 629–40.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107(1): 57–79.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H., Martin, Andrew D., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 768–76.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2001. “The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policymaker.” Emory Law Journal 50(2): 583–611.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Posner, Eric. 2018. “If the Supreme Court Is Nakedly Political, Can It Be Just?” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2018/07/09/opinion/supreme-court-nominee-trump.html (December 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66–83.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Mackuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farganis, Dion. 2012. “Do Reasons Matter? The Impact of Opinion Content on Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 65(1): 206–16.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science 32(2): 416–40.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Johnston, Christopher. 2014. “Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity.” Political Psychology 35(3): 337–58.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Stenner, Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18(4): 741–70.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics.” Political Psychology 38(S1): 127–50.Google Scholar
Fontana, David, and Braman, Donald. 2012. “Judicial Backlash or Just Backlash? Evidence from a National Experiment.” Columbia Law Review 112(4): 731–99.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 751–71.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 1998. “The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy.” NYU Law Review 73(2): 333–433.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry 2005. “The Myths of Marbury.” In Arguing Marbury v. Madison, ed. Tushnet, Mark. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, and Delaney, Erin F.. 2011. “Becoming Supreme: The Federal Foundation of Judicial Supremacy.” Columbia Law Review 111(6): 1137–93.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M., and Randazzo, Kirk A.. 2011. “Testing the Effects of Independent Judiciaries on the Likelihood of Democratic Backsliding.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 696–709.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law & Society Review 23(3): 469–96.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1991. “Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality.” Law & Society Review 25(3): 631–36.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1998. “A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 819–50.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2006. “Do Strong Group Identities Fuel Intolerance? Evidence from the South African Case.” Political Psychology 27(5): 665–705.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2007. “The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4(3): 507–38.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2011. “A Note of Caution about the Meaning of ‘The Supreme Court Can Usually Be Trusted …’” Law & Courts: Newsletter of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association 21(3): 10–16.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2015. “Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” In Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust, eds. Brian H Bornstein and Alan J Tomkins.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009a. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2009b. “Confirmation Politics and the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination.” American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 139–55.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2009c. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.” The Journal of Politics 71(2): 429–41.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2011. “Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?” Law & Society Review 45(1): 195–219.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A.. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 343–58.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2002. “The Role of Theory in Experimental Design: Experiments Without Randomization.” Political Analysis 10(4): 362–75.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta 2003a. “Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta 2003b. “The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 535–56.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta 2005. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2): 187–201.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Lodge, Milton, and Woodson, Benjamin. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law & Society Review 48(4): 837–66.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10(1): 201–19.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2015a. “Can the U.S. Supreme Court Have Too Much Legitimacy?” In Making Law and Courts Research Relevant: The Normative Implications of Empirical Research, ed. Bartels, Brandon L. and Bonneau, Chris W.. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2015b. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 162–74.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2016. “Change in Institutional Support for the US Supreme Court: Is the Court’s Legitimacy Imperiled by the Decisions It Makes?” Public.Opinion Quarterly 80(3): 622–41.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J. 2017. “Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles Do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14(3): 592–617.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Pereira, Miguel M., and Ziegler, Jeffrey. 2017. “Updating Supreme Court Legitimacy: Testing the ‘Rule, Learn, Update’ Model of Political Communication.” American Politics Research 45(6): 980–1002.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Goldstein, Daniel G.. 1999. “Betting on One Good Reason: The Take the Best Heuristic.” In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, ed. Gigerenzer, Gerd and Todd, Peter M.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891.” American Political Science Review 96(3): 511–24.Google Scholar
Goren, Paul. 2005. “Party Identification and Core Political Values.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 881–96.Google Scholar
Goren, Paul 2013. On Voter Competence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goren, Paul, Federico, Christopher M., and Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2009. “Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 805–20.Google Scholar
Graham, Matthew, and Svolik, Milan W.. 2018. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric. 2013. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grosskopf, Anke, and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 1998. “Do Attitudes toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633–54.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108(4): 814–34.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2011. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 352–66.Google Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J., and Kalkan, Ozan Kerem. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 263–77.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Smith, Joseph L.. 2007. “Issue Preferences and Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71(1): 40–66.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 546–60.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2001. “Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 145–53.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory. 1996. “Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience.” In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, ed. Tory Higgins, E and Kruglanski, Arie W.. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Seth J. 2017. “Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning about Political Facts.” The Journal of Politics 79(4): 1403–18.Google Scholar
Hill, Seth J., and Tausanovitch, Chris. 2015. “A Disconnect in Representation? Comparison of Trends in Congressional and Public Polarization.” The Journal of Politics 77(4): 1058–75.Google Scholar
Hitt, Matthew P., and Searles, Kathleen. 2018. “Media Coverage and Public Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Communication 35(4): 566–86.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94(1): 89–100.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel.” The Journal of Politics 58(4): 1079–1102.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Levine, Jeffrey, Morgan, William, and Sprague, John. 1999. “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 43(3): 888–911.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Lene, Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Simon, Adam. 1993. “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing.” Communication Research 20(3): 365–83.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–31.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 690–707.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., and Ballard, Andrew O.. 2016. “Economists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy Judgments.” Journal of Politics 78(2): 443–56.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2010. “Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes toward American Courts.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(2): 260–85.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., Sunshine Hillygus, D, and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2014. “Ideology, the Affordable Care Act Ruling, and Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78(4): 963–73.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., Lavine, Howard G., and Federico, Christopher M.. 2017. Open Versus Closed: Personality, Identity, and the Politics of Redistribution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., and Wronski, Julie. 2015. “Personality Dispositions and Political Preferences Across Hard and Easy Issues.” Political Psychology 36(1): 35–53.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway, . 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–75.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Chadly Stern, Nicholas O. Rule, and Joanna Sterling, . 2017. “The Politics of Fear: Is There an Ideological Asymmetry in Existential Motivation?” Social Cognition 35(4): 324–53.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. et al. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2: 732–35.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2015. “Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem.” Advances in Political Psychology 36(S1): 1–43.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Hank, Jenkins‐Smith, and Braman, Donald. 2011. “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14(2): 147–74.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Dawson, Erica Cantrell, and Slovic, Paul. 2017. “Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government.” Behavioural Public Policy 1(1): 54–86.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2007. “When Duty Calls, Do Citizens Answer?” The Journal of Politics 69(1): 17–29.Google Scholar
Katz, Ellis. 1965. “Patterns of Compliance with the Schempp Decision.” Journal of Public Law 14(2): 396–408.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, Brett M. 2017. “Keynote Address: Two Challenges for the Judge as Umpire: Statutory Ambiguity and Constitutional Exceptions.” Notre Dame Law Review 92(5): 1907–19.Google Scholar
Key, Jr., V. O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kalmoe, Nathan P.. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2014. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2001. “Foreword: We the Court.” Harvard Law Review 115(1): 5–169.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2001. “The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of Supreme Court.” Judicature 85(1): 32–38.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W. 1989. “The Psychology of Being ‘Right’: The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 106(3): 395–409.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–98.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2016. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, Third Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Mark J. et al. 2004. “Deliver Us from Evil: The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(9): 1136–50.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard G., Johnston, Christopher D., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Leeper, Thomas J., and Slothuus, Rune. 2014. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation.” Political Psychology 35(S1): 129–56.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach. 2016. “Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 392–410.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2017. “The Limits of Partisan Prejudice.” The Journal of Politics 79(2): 485–501.Google Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125(2): 255–75.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret, Sacks, Audrey, and Tyler, Tom. 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53(3): 354–75.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
Little, Andrew T. 2019. “The Distortion of Related Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 63(3): 675–89.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lopez, Jesse, and Sunshine Hillygus, D. 2018. “Why So Serious?: Survey Trolls and Misinformation.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Jessee, Stephen A.. 2014. “Ideological Proximity and Support for The Supreme Court.” Political Behavior 36(4): 817–46.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra L.. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mark, Alyx, and Zilis, Michael A.. 2018. “The Conditional Effectiveness of Legislative Threats: How Court Curbing Alters the Behavior of (Some) Supreme Court Justices.” Political Research Quarterly: (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 2008. Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128–45.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58(2): 361–82.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 2009. “Public Schools, Religious Establishments, and the U.S. Supreme Court: An Examination of Policy Compliance.” American Politics Research 37(1): 50–74.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T., and Stimson, James A.. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics 66(4): 1018–35.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2009. “Terrorist Threat, Leadership, and the Vote: Evidence from Three Experiments.” Political Behavior 31(4): 575.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87(1): 87–101.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.” The Journal of Politics 58(1): 169–200.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12(4): 363–84.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Institutional Approval.” American Politics Quarterly 19(2): 174–88.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20(4): 457–77.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. “Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality.” Law & Society Review 27(3): 599–608.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994. “Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation.” Political Research Quarterly 47(3): 675–92.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 59(4): 1114–42.Google Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1962. Congress and the Court. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” Law & Society Review 2(3): 357–84.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jack H. 1975. The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart S. 1965. “Court-Curbing Periods in American History.” Vanderbilt Law Review 18(3): 925–44.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Gibson, James L.. 2017. “Testing Spatial Models of Politics: The Perils of Subtraction-Based Measures of Subjective Ideological Proximity.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Smith, Steven S.. 2015. “Change and Stability in the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Uribe-McGuire., Alicia 2017. “Opportunity and Overrides: The Effect of Institutional Public Support on Congressional Overrides of Supreme Court Decisions.” Political Research Quarterly 70(3): 632–43.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91(3): 567–83.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 620–36.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Howard, Robert M.. 2003. “Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore.” Journal of Politics 65(3): 676–95.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 711–16.Google Scholar
Patric, Gordon. 1957. “The Impact of a Court Decision: Aftermath of the McCollum Case.” Journal of Public Law 6(2): 455–64.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark, Hutchison, Marc L., and Shamir, Michal. 2015. “The Impact of Persistent Terrorism on Political Tolerance: Israel, 1980 to 2011.” American Political Science Review 109(4): 817–32.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark, Knigge, Pia, and Hurwitz, Jon. 2001. “A Multiple Values Model of Political Tolerance.” Political Research Quarterly 54(2): 379–406.Google Scholar
Petersen, Michael, Slothuus, Rune, Stubager, Rune, and Togeby, Lise. 2011. “Freedom for All? The Strength and Limits of Political Tolerance.” British Journal of Political Science 41(3): 581–97.Google Scholar
Pritchett, C. Herman. 1961. Congress versus the Supreme Court, 1957–1960. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles M.. 1960. “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement.” The Journal of Politics 22(2): 276–94.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Mark D. 2008. “Procedural Perceptions and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Psychology 29(5): 675–98.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1994. “The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.” The Journal of Legal Studies 23(2): 721–47.Google Scholar
Roccas, Sonia, Lilach Sagiv, Shalom H. Schwartz, , and Knafo, Ariel. 2002. “The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(6): 789–801.Google Scholar
Rogers, James R. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 84–99.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1992. “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.” The Review of Politics 54(03): 369–98.Google Scholar
Salamone, Michael F. 2014. “Judicial Consensus and Public Opinion: Conditional Response to Supreme Court Majority Size.” Political Research Quarterly 67(2): 320–34.Google Scholar
Salamone, Michael F. 2018. Perceptions of a Polarized Court: How Division among Justices Shapes the Supreme Court’s Public Image. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Scheb, John M., and Lyons, William. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81(4): 928–40.Google Scholar
Scheb, John M., and Lyons, William 2001. “Judicial Behavior and Public Opinion: Popular Expectations Regarding the Factors That Influence Supreme Court Decisions.” Political Behavior 23(2): 181–94.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Alexander A. 2000. A Logic of Expressive Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Westerland, Chad, and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 89–104.Google Scholar
Sen, Maya. 2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations.” Political Research Quarterly 70(2): 374–93.Google Scholar
Simon, Dan, and Scurich, Nicholas. 2011. “Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8(4): 709–27.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Betsy. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew. 2018. “Delegating Away Democracy: How Good Representation and Policy Successes Can Undermine Democratic Legitimacy.” Comparative Political Studies 51(13): 1754–88.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E., and Segal, Jennifer A.. 1998. Television News and the Supreme Court: All the News That’s Fit to Air? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune, and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” The Journal of Politics 72(3): 630–45.Google Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill, and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2014. The Media, the Court, and the Misrepresentation: The New Myth of the Court. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spill, Rorie L., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2003. “Philosopher Kings or Political Actors? How the Media Portray the Supreme Court.” Judicature 87(1): 22–29.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2004. “Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 20(2): 379–99.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., Mackuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.Google Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel Andrew. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Stoutenborough, James W., Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Allen, Mahalley D.. 2006. “Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases.” Political Research Quarterly 59(3): 419–33.Google Scholar
Strother, Logan. 2017. “How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases.” Political Communication 34(4): 571–89.Google Scholar
Strother, Logan, and Gadarian, Shana. 2019. “The Supreme Court in a Polarized Era: Is Legitimacy at Risk?” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Harry P. 1965. “Congressional Response to Supreme Court Rulings: The Interaction of Law and Politics.” Journal of Public Law 14(2): 377–95.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, and Tyler, Tom R.. 2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.” Law & Society Review 37(3): 513–48.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2018. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–69.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. 2015. “Priming Predispositions and Changing Policy Positions: An Account of When Mass Opinion Is Primed or Changed.” American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 806–24.Google Scholar
Treanor, William Michael. 2005. “Judicial Review before ‘Marbury.’” Stanford Law Review 58(2): 455–562.Google Scholar
Treier, Shawn, and Sunshine Hillygus, D. 2009. “The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73(4): 679–703.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1994. “Governing amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decisionmaking Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government.” Law & Society Review 28(4): 809–32.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006a. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57(1): 375–400.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006b. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Rasinski, Kenneth. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law & Society Review 25(3): 621–30.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, Eric Luis, Andrew Poehlman, T, and Bargh, John A.. 2009. “American Moral Exceptionalism.” In Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, eds. Kay, Aaron C., Jost, John T., and Thorisdottir, Hulda. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 346–61.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg 2015. “Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment.” Annual Review of Political Science 18(1): 167–85.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, Marcus, George E., and Foucault, Martial. 2018. “Emotional Responses to the Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Addressing the Authoritarianism Puzzle.” Political Psychology 39(3): 557–75.Google Scholar
Webster, Donna M., Richter, Linda, and Kruglanski, Arie W.. 1996. “On Leaping to Conclusions When Feeling Tired: Mental Fatigue Effects on Impressional Primacy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32(2): 181–95.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven W., and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45(4): 621–47.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99(4): 583–96.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woodson, Benjamin. 2015. “Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions.” Journal of Law and Courts 3(2): 193–221.Google Scholar
Woodson, Benjamin 2018. “The Dynamics of Legitimacy Change for the U.S. Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 39(1): 75–94.Google Scholar
Woodson, Benjamin 2019. “The Causes of the Legitimacy-Conferring and Republican Schoolmaster Capabilities of Courts.” Journal of Law and Courts 7(2): 281–303.Google Scholar
Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael A. 2015. The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael A. 2018. “Minority Groups and Judicial Legitimacy: Group Affect and the Incentives for Judicial Responsiveness.” Political Research Quarterly 71(2): 270–83.Google Scholar
Zink, James R., Spriggs, James F., and Scott, John T.. 2009. “Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions.” Journal of Politics 71(3): 909–25.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×