Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:24:06.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2024

Vera Keller
Vera Keller
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Curating the Enlightenment
Johann Daniel Major and the Experimental Century
 , pp. 351 - 390
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Academy of the Curious about Nature. Index generalis … Dec. I et II ephemeridum Germanicarum. Nuremberg: Endter, 1695.Google Scholar
Academy of the Curious about Nature. “Sacri Romani Imperii Academiae Naturae Curiosorum Auctae & Reformatae Leges,” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 2 1671, [h2v].Google Scholar
Agricola, Georg. De animantibus subterraneis. Basel: Froben, 1549.Google Scholar
Albert, Heinrich. Arien. Leipzig: Cellarius, 1657.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich. Compendium lexici philosophici. Herborn: Corvinus, 1626.Google Scholar
Amthor, Christoph Heinrich (as Anastasius Sincerus). Project der Oeconomie in Form einer Wissenschaft. Frankfurt: NA, 1717 [1716].Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Johannes Molleri … Isagoge.” Acta Eruditorum (Feb. 1692), 94–5.Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Notitia Musei Cimbrici B. D. Joh. Danielis Majoris.” Nova literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (Nov. 1698), 213–8.Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa 1 1670, 265.Google Scholar
Arnkiel, Troels. Cimbrische Heyden-Religion. 4 parts. Hamburg: Wiering, 1702.Google Scholar
Aroselius, Laurentius (respondens), and Watson, Michael (praeses). De historia ante diluviana. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Advancement of Learning. London: Tomes, 1605.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. De dignitate et augmentis scientiarum. London: Haviland, 1623.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Sylva sylvarum. London: Lee, 1628.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Caspar. Anatomicae institutiones corporis humani … cum plurimis novis observationibus & opinionibus, nec non illustriorum, quae in Anthropologia occurrunt, controversiarum decisionibus. Rostock: Ferber, 1622.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Erasmus. De naturae mirabilibus quaestiones academicae. Copenhagen: Haubold, 1674.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Ad D. Jo. Dan. Majorem, in nova Academia Chiloniensi Profess. & Sponsum.” In Carmina. Copenhagen: Paulli, 1666.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Confectio Alkermes Danica.” Acta Hafniensia 1 (1671), 80–1.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. Domus anatomica. Copenhagen: Haubold, 1662.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Excellentissimorum medicorum Judicia.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 2 (1671), [c4v].Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. De medicina Danorum domestica. Copenhagen: Haubold, 1666.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Rariora in officinis quibusdam Pharmaceuticis.” Acta Hafniensia 1 (1671), 73–8.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “De Succino experimenta.” Acta Hafniensia 1 (1671), 111–14.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “De Theriaca Danica & succini generatione.” Acta Hafniensia 2 (1672), 306.Google Scholar
Bausch, Johann Lorenz. Schediasmata bina curiosa de lapide haematite et aetite. Leipzig: Trescher, 1665.Google Scholar
Becher, Johann Joachim. Methodus Didactica. Munich: Maria Magdalena Schellin, 1668.Google Scholar
Becher, Johann Joachim. Politische Discurs. Frankfurt: Zunner, 1688.Google Scholar
Beyer, Johann Jacob. De meritis Germanorum in rem medicam. Altdorf: Meyer, 1704.Google Scholar
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. Über die natürlichen Verschiedenheiten im Menschengeschlechte. Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1798.Google Scholar
Boccone, Paolo. Recherches et Observations Naturelles. Paris: Barbin 1671.Google Scholar
Bödiker, Johannes. Grund-Sätze der Deutschen Sprachen. Cologne: Liebpert, 1690.Google Scholar
Borel, Pierre. Les antiquitez, raretez, plantes, minéraux & autres choses considérables de la ville et comté de Castres … Avec le role des principaux cabinets et autres raretez de l’Europe, comme aussi le catalogue des choses rares de maistre Pierre Borel. Castres: Colomiez, 1649.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Certain Physiological Essays. London: Herringman, 1661.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours. London: Herringman, 1664.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Some Considerations Touching the Usefulnesse of Experimental Naturall Philosophy. Oxford: Hall, 1664.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Tractatus de cosmicis rerum qualitatibus, trans. Morhof, D. G.. Amsterdam: Janssonius a Waesberge, 1671.Google Scholar
Bremer, Asmus. Chronicon Kiliense tragicum-curiosum, 1432–1717, ed. Stern, Moritz. Kiel: Fiencke, 1916.Google Scholar
de Bremond, M. Table des Mémoires imprimés dans les Transactions Philosophiques de la Société Royale de Londres depuis 1665 jusques en 1735. Paris: Piget, 1739.Google Scholar
Brenner, Sophie. Samlade Poetiska Dikter, af Sophia Elisabeth Brenner. Upsala: Hansel, 1873.Google Scholar
Briet, Philippe. Annales mundi, sive Chronicon universale. Augsburg: Rencard, 1696.Google Scholar
Broctorf, Detlev (respondens), and Reyher, Samuel (praeses). De rege mathematico. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Büchner, Andrea Elias. Academiae … naturae curiosorum historia. Halle: Gebauer, 1755.Google Scholar
Buoninsegna, Francesco. Satyra Menippea, oder Straff-Schrifft Weiblicher Pracht, trans. Major, Johann Daniel. Hamburg: Wulff, 1683.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. Erinnerungen aus Rubens. Basel: Lendorff, 1898.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. “The Great Men of History.” In Reflections on History. London: Allen & Unwin, 1943, 172–203.Google Scholar
Busse, Martinus (respondens), and Thomasius, Jacob (praeses). De doctoribus scholasticis latinis. Leipzig: Coler, 1676.Google Scholar
de Candolle, A. P. Théorie Élémentaire de la Botanique. Paris: Déterville, 1813.Google Scholar
Capell, Joachim Ernst (respondens), and Hannemann, Johann Ludwig (praeses). Dissertatio physica systematis caeli et terrae auream catenam exhibens. Kiel: Reuther, 1710.Google Scholar
Capell, Rudolf. Nummophylacium Luederianum. Hamburg: Rebenlin, 1679.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. London: Piccadilly, 1852.Google Scholar
Cassius, Andreas. De … auro. Hamburg: Wolff, 1685.Google Scholar
Cassius, Andreas. De triumviratu intestinali cum suis effervescentiis, repetita disputatio. Hamburg: Placidius, 1669.Google Scholar
Cassius, Andreas (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De febre artificiali. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Clarke, Timothy. “A Letter.” Philosophical Transactions 3 (1668), 672–82.Google Scholar
Clauder, Gabriel. De tinctura universali. Altenburg: Richter, 1678.Google Scholar
Clausner, Georg (respondens), and Feuerlein, Jacob Wilhelm (praeses). Disputatio inauguralis de polymathia philosophica. Altdorf: Meyer, 1718.Google Scholar
Cogel, Friedrich. Melpomene Cassiana, Praefica. Lübeck: Schmalhertz, 1677.Google Scholar
Cohausen, Johann Heinrich. Ossilegium historico-physicum. Frankfurt: Fuhrman, 1714.Google Scholar
Coler, Christoph. Oratio Nuptialis. Brega: Tschorn, 1653.Google Scholar
Coles, Elisha. A Dictionary, English-Latin, and Latin-English. London: Richardson, 1679.Google Scholar
Colonna, Fabio. De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Comes, Natalis. Mythologiae. Frankfurt: Wechel, 1588.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. De Germanicorum corporum habitus antiqui ac novi causis. Helmstedt: Muller, 1645.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. In universam artem medicam, ed. Schellhammer, G. C.. Helmstedt: Hamm, 1687.Google Scholar
Crusius, Johann (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Disputatio medica quam de aurea catena Jovis coelo demissa. Kiel: Reumann, 1685.Google Scholar
Danckwerth, Caspar. Newe Landesbeschreibung Der Zwey Hertzogthümer Schleswich und Holstein. Husum: Petersen, 1652.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Explicatio machinarum vel instrumentorum, trans. Major, Johann Daniel. Kiel: Reumann, 1672.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. Encyclopédie. Vol. 9. Geneva: Pella, 1777.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Johann (respondens) and Franck, Christopher (praeses). De abditis rerum sublimium arcanis, Schediasma Inaugurale. Kiel: Reumann, 1683.Google Scholar
Dodart, Denis. “Extrait d’une Lettre escrite par Monsieur Dodart à l’Auteur du Journal, au sujet du Mangeur de Feu, dont il est parlé dans le quatriéme Journal de cette Année.” Journal des sçavans (July 19, 1678), 222–32.Google Scholar
Eckhard, Martin (respondens), and Waldschmidt, Johann Jacob (praeses). Disputatio physica de colore aethiopum. Marburg: Kürsner, 1683.Google Scholar
Elrod, Cosmas (respondens), and Kortholt, Christian (praeses), De religione ethnica, Muhammedana, et judaica. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Johann Albert. De hominibus orbis nostri incolis specie et ortu avito inter se non differentibus. Hamburg: NA, 1721.Google Scholar
Fardella, Michael Angelo. Animae humanae naturae ab Augustino detecta. Venice: Albriccio, 1698.Google Scholar
Feind, Barthold. Relationes curiosae. Hamburg: Reumann, 1705.Google Scholar
Francisci, Erasmus. Ost- und West-Indianischer wie auch Sinesischer Lust- und Stats-Garten. Nuremberg: Endter, 1668.Google Scholar
Francisci, Erasmus. Der Wunder-reiche Uberzug [sic] unserer Nider-Welt. Nuremberg: Endter, 1680.Google Scholar
French Academy of Sciences. Another Collection of Philosophical Conferences of the French Virtuosi. London: Dring and Starkey, 1665.Google Scholar
Garmann, Christian Friedrich. Epistolarum centuria. Rostock: Garmann, 1714.Google Scholar
Gerike, Peter. Dissertatio inauguralis medica de studio novitatis in medicina. Altorf: Meyer, 1721.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph. Plus Ultra: or, the Progress and Advancement of Knowledge since the Days of Aristotle. London: Collins, 1668.Google Scholar
Gramm, Caeso. Chilonium Novus Holsatiæ Parnassus. Schleswig: Holwein, 1665.Google Scholar
Gröning, Johann. Das Geöfnete Müntz-Cabinet. Hamburg: Schiller, 1700.Google Scholar
Gröning, Johann. Historia Numismatico-critica. Hamburg: Schiller, 1700.Google Scholar
Gundling, Nicolaus Hieronymus. Vollständige Historie der Gelahrheit. Vol. 4. Leipzig: Spring, 1736.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Aetiologia philosophico-medica curiosa facultatis purgatricis … contra Willisum et Willisianos. Hamburg: Lichtenstein, 1677.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. “Anatome Aethiopis faeminae.” Acta Hafniensia 4 (1675), 50–1.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Curiosum scrutinium nigredinis posterorum Cham i.e. Aethioipium. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Fasciculus miscellanearum quaestionum sexaginta. Bremen: Wessel, 1672.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Nova Ars Clymastica, Enervata. Stade: Holwein, 1670.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Ovum Hermetico-Paracelsico-Trismegistum. Frankfurt: Knoch, 1694.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. “Porismata de luce.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix, Dec. 2, An. 5 (1686), 562–4.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Prodromus Lexici, Utriusque Medicinae Practicae. Hamburg: Naumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Ruach Universalis mundo restitutus. Stade: Holwein, 1670.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. “De Scopelismis Cymbricis.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 2, An. 4. (1683), 124–6.Google Scholar
Happel, Eberhard Werner. Relationes curiosae. Hamburg: Wiering, 1681–91.Google Scholar
Happel, Eberhard Werner. Der Teutsche Carl. Ulm: Wagner, 1690.Google Scholar
Heiden, Gottfried Prosper Johann (respondens), and Ridemann, Heinrich (praeses). De camera obscura. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Hermann, Leonhard David. Maslographia. Brieg: Gründer, 1711.Google Scholar
Herttenstein, Johann Friedrich (respondens), and Sebisch, Melchior (praeses). De origine fontium. Strasbourg: NA, 1699.Google Scholar
Hesporn, Franz (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Positiones medicae variae. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Holyk, Georg. New-vermehrtes vierfaches Garten-Büchlein. Frankfurt: Ritschel, 1707.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert. Micrographia. London: Martyn, 1665.Google Scholar
Hubert, Robert. A catalogue of many natural rarities. London: NA, 1664.Google Scholar
Jenquel, Kaspar Friedrich. Museographia. Breslau: Hubert, 1727.Google Scholar
Juch, Paul Florian (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De moderamine conspirationis. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
Juncker, Christian. De ephemeridibus. Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1692.Google Scholar
Juncker, Johann. Conspectus medicinae theoretico-practicae. Halle: Orphanage, 1718.Google Scholar
Jung, Georg Sebastian. “Observatio CXI: Crucifixus.” Miscellanea curiosa 1 (1670), 261.Google Scholar
Jung, Georg Sebastian. “Observatio CXIII. Imago B. Mariae Virginis cum Filiolo.” Miscellanea curiosa 1 (1670), 264–5.Google Scholar
Kanold, Johann. Sammlung. Wrocław: Hubert, 1719.Google Scholar
Kiel, University of. Chronicles and schedules of lectures (1665–2000). https://dibiki.ub.uni-kiel.de/viewer/toc/PPN612166120/1/LOG_0000/.Google Scholar
Kielmannsegg, Friedrich Christian von. Bibliotheca Kielmans-Eggiana, 4 vols. Hamburg: Trausold, 1718–21.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Johann Jacob (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De tactis fulmine. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius. Ars magna lucis et umbrae. Rome: Grignani, 1646.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius. Mundus Subterraneus. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Weyerstrat, 1665.Google Scholar
Kirchmaier, Georg Caspar. Epistolae clarisssimorum virorum ad Georg Casp. Kirchmaierum. Wittenberg: Ludwig, 1703.Google Scholar
Kleffel, Johann Christoph. Abhandlungen von den Vorzügen der alten Nordischen Seekunst vor den Römern und Griechen. 5 vols. Kiel: NA, 1753–64.Google Scholar
Kleffel, Johann Christoph. Antiquitates Germanorum. Frankfurt: Paulli, 1733.Google Scholar
Köhler, Johann David, ed. Sylloge aliquot scriptorium de bene ordinanda et ornanda bibliotheca. Frankfurt: Stein, 1728.Google Scholar
Kortholt, Sebastian. de Bibliotheca academiae Kiloniensis. Kiel: Reuther, 1705.Google Scholar
Kranz, Gottlob. Memorabilia bibliothecae Elisabethanae Wratislaviensis. Wrocław: Steck, 1699.Google Scholar
Krysing, Georg. Cimbrischen Heiden-Antiquitäten. Flensburg: Vogel, 1734.Google Scholar
Kunckel, Johann. Chymische Anmerckungen … mit Anhang einer Chymischen Brille contra Non-Entia Chymica. Wittenberg: Fincel, 1677.Google Scholar
Kundmann, Johann Christian. “Neue Entdeckung.” Sammlung von Natur- und Medicin- wie auch hierzu gehörigen Kunst- und Literatur-Geschichten 23 (1723), 171–88.Google Scholar
Lachmund, Friedrich. De ave diomedea. Amsterdam: Frisius, 1674.Google Scholar
Lachmund, Friedrich. Oryctographia Hildesheimensis sive admirandorum fossilium, quae in tractu Hildesheimensi reperiuntur, descriptio. Hildesheim: Müller, 1669.Google Scholar
de Laet, Jan. De gemmis. Leiden: Maire, 1647.Google Scholar
Langelott, Joel. “Epistola.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 3 (1672), 96–105.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. Mr. Le Clerc’s Judgment and Censure of Dr. Bentley’s Horace. London: Taylor, 1713.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. Physica. Amsterdam: Gallet, 1696.Google Scholar
de Lengerken, Hermann (respondens), and Johann Daniel Major (praeses). De aerumnis gigantum. Kiel: Reumann, 1689.Google Scholar
de Lengerken, Hermann (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De aerumnis gigantum. Kiel: Reumann, 1676.Google Scholar
Lambeck, Peter. Liber Primus Prodromi historiae literariae. Hamburg: Piper, 1659.Google Scholar
Lather, Hermann. De censu. Frankfurt: Jennis, 1618.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Guilielmi Pacidi Plus ultra seu introductio et specimina Methodi arcanae de Instauratione et Augmentis Scientiarum ad communem felicitatem.” In Philosophische Schriften. Vol. 4, 1677–June 1690, ed. Schepers, Heinrich, Schneider, Martin, Biller, Gerhard, Franke, Ursula, and Kliege-Biller, Herma. Berlin: Akademie, 1999, 971–80.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Oeuvres. Vol. 7, ed. de Careil, A. Foucer. Paris: Fimin Didot, 1875.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Paraenesis de Scientia Generali.” In Philosophische Schriften. Vol. 4, 1677–June 1690, ed. Schepers, Heinrich, Schneider, Martin, Biller, Gerhard, Franke, Ursula, and Kliege-Biller, Herma. Berlin: Akademie, 1999, 677–85.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophischer Briefwechsel, 1686–1694. Berlin: Akademie, 2009.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Politische Schriften, ed. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften/Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin: Akademie, 1983.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Berlin: Akademie, 1923–present.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Unvorgreiffliche Gedanken betreffend die Ausübung und Verbesserung der Teutschen Sprache.” In Opera Omnia. Vol. 6, Part 2. Geneva: NA, 1768.Google Scholar
Liebknecht, Johann Georg. Grund-Sätze der … Mathematischen Wissenschafften. Frankfurt: Lammers, 1726.Google Scholar
Lilienthal, Michael. De historia literaria certae cujusdam gentis scribenda consultatio. Leipzig: Russworm 1710.Google Scholar
Lilienthal, Michael. De Machiavellismo literario sive de perversis quorundam in Republica Literaria inclarescendi artibus dissertatio historico-moralis. Leipzig: Boye, 1713.Google Scholar
Loredano, Giovan Francesco. “Indice de’ Letterati, che con le Stampe hanno nominato l’Auttore.” In Opere. Venice: Guerigli, 1661, [*8r].Google Scholar
Madai, David Samuel von. Verzeichniß der auserlesenen Talersammlung des … David Samuel von Madai. Hamburg: NA, 1788.Google Scholar
Major, Detlev Johann (respondens), and Stryk, Elias August (praeses), Dissertatio juridica de proclamatione et banno homicidae fugitivi. Kiel: Reumann, 1692.Google Scholar
Major, Elias. Schediasmata Germanica. Öls: Seyffert, 1657.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De Acheronte Orphei, vel umbilico maris Homerico, disquisitio Hydrographica, in qua quoddam Kircheri Assertum, in Dubium vocatur. Hamburg: Wolff, 1688.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad collegium anatomicum, de oculo humano, chamaeleontis, noctuae, ac aliorum animalium. Kiel: Reumann, 1690.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad disputationem inauguralem quam de amaurosi vel gutta serena invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad oculi declarationem anatomicam curiosos. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad … Sebastianum Schefferum … Conringianam artis medicae introductionem … Adhortatione. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Americanische … Aloe. Schleswig: Holwein, 1668.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Anatomen Cygni. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Anatomen Kiloniensem Primam, in corpore humano. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Anatomen, literato quovis dignam. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Annotationes ad Columnam de Purpura,” in Colonna, Fabio, De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675, n.p.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Bevölckertes Cimbrien. Plön: Schmied, 1692.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Chirurgia infusoria. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “De citro in citro.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 3 (1672), 432–3.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Collegium medico-curiosum. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Consideratio ferri radiantis … & incidenter quaedam de thermis, novo artificio parandis. Schleswig: Holwein, 1679.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Consideratio Physiologica occurentium quorundam in nuper-editis Epistolis duabus Dn. Franc. Jos. Burrhi, De Cerebro & Oculis: ad Dn. D. Th. Bartholinum scriptis. Kiel: Reumann, 1669.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Deliciae hybernae, sive tria nova inventa medica. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Dictionarium Ostralogicum,” in Colonna, Fabio, De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675, n.p.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Doctrinae de Testaceis in Ordinem congruum redactae Specimen, Tabulis … quàm caeteroquin inserviturum facilè ad Conchylia et Testacea reliquia, in Conclavibus Principum ac allis, recte disponenda,” in Colonna, Fabio, De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675, n.p.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Emblemata de Purpura Reyherianae. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Genius errans, sive de ingeniorum in scientiis abusu dissertatio. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Grosses Reichthum/zusammengebracht aus den meisten Schätzen der Welt: oder Interims-Discurs von Kunst-und Naturalien-Kammern. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Hadria gloriosa. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Historia anatomes Kiloniensis primae. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Historia anatomica calculorum … in renibus … J. Sperlingii, repertorum. Leipzig: Hahn, 1662.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Index Alphabeticus. NA, 1674.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De inventis a se thermis artificialibus succinatis. Kiel: Reumann, 1680.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Joh. Danielis Horstii judicium de chirurgia infusoria. Frankfurt: Fickwirt, 1665.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Kilonii.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (June 1698), 99.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Medicinae … Practicae … Tabula Sciagraphica, nos. 1–27. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Memoria Sachsiana. Leipzig: Fritsch, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Memoriale Anatomico-Miscellaneum. Kiel: Reumann, 1669.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Musei Cimbrici … Aditus I. Kiel: Reumann, 1689.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Musei Cimbrici … Aditus II. Kiel: Reumann, 1689.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Museum Cimbricum. Plön: Schmidt, 1688.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De nummis Graece inscriptis. Kiel: Richel, 1685.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De nummis Rehdigerianis. Kiel: Reumann, 1681.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De nummorum aerugine, consultatio epistolica. Kiel: NA, 1685.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De planta monstrosa Gottorpiensi mensis Junii, Anni MDCLXV ubi quaedam de Coalescentiâ Stirpium & Circulatione Succi Nutritii per easdem proferunt. Schleswig: Holwein, 1665.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Prodromus Atlanticae. Kiel: Reumann, 1691.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Prodromus inventae a se chirurgiae infusoriae. Leipzig: Wittigau,1664.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Programma quo … disputationem … de petechiis … invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1681.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Prospectus praeliminaris in theatrum profundae scientiae, sive de concipiendâ anatome nova, breve consilium. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Rei anatomicae. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Roma in nummis augustalibus germanizans. Kiel: Richel, 1684.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Scholion,” to Johann Daniel Major, “Epulis et verruca linguae feliciter curatae.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 2 (1671), 381–2.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Scholion anatomicum ad textum quendam Imp. Justiniani. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. See-Farth nach der Neuen Welt ohne Schiff und Segel. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. See-Farth nach der Neuen Welt ohne Schiff und Segel. Hamburg: Wolff, 1683.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Serapus Radiatus, medicus Aegyptiorum Deus, ex metallo et gemma. Kiel: Richel, 1685.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Summaria medicinae biblicae … tabula. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Udtog af Majors Reise i Danmark 1693.” In Suhm, Peter Fredrik, ed., Nye samlinger til den danske historie. Vol. III. Copenhagen: Poulsen, 1794, 125–34.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Unvorgreiffliches Bedencken von Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern insgemein. Kiel: Reumann, 1674.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Vorstellung etlicher Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern in America und Asia. Kiel: Reumann, 1674.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Vorstellung etlicher Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern in Italien zu Neapolis und Alt-Rom. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Vorstellung etlicher Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern in Africa und an Gräntzen Europae. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel, and Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Dissertatio epistolica de cancris et serpentibus petrefactis … cui accessit … de miranda lapidum natura. Jena: Fellgiebel, 1664.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel (respondens), and Schneider, Conrad Victor (praeses). De lacrymis. Wittenberg: Haken, 1656.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel (respondens), and Sperling, Johann (praeses), Theses Anthropologicas de Pulmone. Wittenberg: Wendt, 1655.Google Scholar
Majus, Johann Burchard. Seinen Vorschlag wegen der künfftig anzustellenden Gelehrten Unterredungen. Kiel: NA, 1697.Google Scholar
March, Caspar. Ad spectandum … dispensationem… quam Dn. Johan Caspar Adophi instituet … invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
March, Caspar. Ad spectandum … dispensationem… quam Dn. Fridericus Bereiter … instituet … invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
March, Caspar Jr. (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Theses medicae inaugurales de motu et sensu abolito in affectibus soporosis. Kiel: Reumann, 1680.Google Scholar
Maty, Paul Henry. A General Index to the Philosophical Transactions, from the First to the End of the Seventieth Volume. London: Davis and Elmsly, 1787.Google Scholar
Meibom, Heinrich. Programma … ad anatomen corporis foeminini in novo theatro primam. Helmstedt: Müller, 1673.Google Scholar
Meibom, Heinrich. De vasis palpebrarum novis epistola. Hamburg: Muller, 1666.Google Scholar
Melle, Jacob van. Historia urnae sepulcralis Sarmatica anno 1674 repertae. Jena: Krebs, 1679.Google Scholar
Mentzel, Christian. “De Chelonitide.” Miscellanea curiosa (1687), 3–4.Google Scholar
Mentzel, Christian. “De lapidibus admirandis.” Miscellanea curiosa (1687), 1–2.Google Scholar
Mercati, Michele. Metallotheca. Rome: Salvioni, 1717.Google Scholar
Mercklin, Georg Abraham. Cynosura medica, sive de scriptis medicis liber II. Nuremberg: Endter, 1686.Google Scholar
Mercklin, Georg Abraham. “Epistola … de Scriptis medicis.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix (1684), 588–92.Google Scholar
Meyer, Georg (respondens), and Tribbechow, Adam (praeses). De philosophia morum inter barbaros praecipue orientales. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Johann Daniel. Raisonnement über die protestantischen Universitäten in Deutschland. 4 vols. Frankfurt: 1768–76.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Johann Martin. Museum Spenerianum. Leipzig: Fleischer, 1693.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Cimbria literata. Copenhagen: Orphanage, 1744.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Cimbriae literatae prodromus, sive de suis in historia patriae literaria conatibus ad virum perillustrem Marquardum Gudium. Schleswig: Holwein, 1687.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. “Flensburgi.” Nova literaria maris Balthici et septentrionalis (April 1698), 63–8.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. “Hypomnemata Historica.” In Scheffer, Johann, Suecia Literata. Hamburg: Liebezeit, 1698, 419–23.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Introductio in ducatuum Cimbricorum, Slesvicensis et Holsatici, historiam … contra Olaum Rudbeckium & Joh. Dan. Maiorem. Hamburg: Libezeit, 1699.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Isagoge ad historiam ducatuum Slesvicensis et Holsatici. Frankurt: Liebezeit, 1691.Google Scholar
Möller, Nicolaus. De Polymathia Verissima et antiqua. Kiel: Richel, 1695.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Dissertationes Academicae & Epistolicae. Hamburg: Liebernickel, 1699.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Epistola de scypho vitreo. Kiel: Reumann, 1672.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. De metallorum transmutatione. Hamburg: Schultze, 1673.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Opera Poëtica. Lubeck: Böckmann, 1697.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Orationes. Hamburg: Liebernickel, 1698.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Polyhistor. 2 parts. Lübeck: Böckmann, 1688–92.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Polyhistor, ed. Möller, Johann. 3 tomes. Lübeck: Böckmann, 1707–47.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. De ratione conscribendarum epistolarum libellus. Lübeck: Böckmann, 1716.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. De scypho vitreo. Kiel: Reumann, 1682.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Unterricht von der Teutschen Sprache und Poesie. Lübeck: Wiedemeyer, 1700.Google Scholar
Neogard, Nicolaus (respondens), and Heldberg, Georg Ernst (praeses). De primo complexo cognitionis humanae principio, disputatio I. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Nyerup, R. Antiquariske Reise til Fyen. Copenhagen: Seidel, 1814.Google Scholar
Oesterling, Johannes (respondens), and Schminck, J. H. (praeses). Dissertatio historica de urnis sepulchralibus et armis lapideis veterum Cattorum. Marburg: Müller, 1714.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Henry. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols., ed. and trans. Hall, A. Rupert and Boas Hall, Marie. London: Taylor & Francis, 1965–86.Google Scholar
Olearius, Adam. Gottorfische Kunst-Kammer. Schleswig: Holwein, 1666.Google Scholar
Olearius, Adam. Kurtzer Begriff einer Holsteinischen Chronic. Schleswig: Holwein, 1663.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John. Theatrum Botanicum. London: Cotes, 1640.Google Scholar
Pasch, Georg. De Novis Inventis. Leipzig: Gross, 1700.Google Scholar
Patin, Charles. Relation. Lyons: Merciére, 1676.Google Scholar
Pechlin, Johann Nicolas. De habitu et colore Aethiopum, qui vulgo nigritae, liber. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Pechlin, Johann Nicolas. Theses de affectibus soporosis. Kiel: Reumann, 1680.Google Scholar
Peedle, Thomas, and Cozbie, Thomas. The Falacie of the Great Water-Drinker Discovered. London: Dunster, 1650.Google Scholar
Peikenkamp, Hermann. Brevis ac necessaria relatio successus exercitii physicotechnici, Marburgensis. NA: NA, 1683.Google Scholar
Petersen, Johann Wilhelm. Memorio … Christiano Cassio. Lübeck: Schmalhertz, 1676.Google Scholar
Placcius, Vincent. Libri a Vincentio Placcio … editi. Hamburg: Liebezeit, 1693.Google Scholar
Placcius, Vincent. De morali scientia augenda. Frankfurt: Zunner, 1677.Google Scholar
Plomann, Andreas (respondens), and Morhof, Daniel Georg (praeses). Dissertatio de paradoxis sensuum. Kiel: Reumann, 1676.Google Scholar
Power, Henry. Experimental Philosophy. London: Martin and Allestry, 1664.Google Scholar
Reimmann, Jacob Friedrich. Versuch einer Einleitung in die Historiam Literariam. Halle: Renger, 1708.Google Scholar
Reisel, Salomon. “Serpens in stomacho Cervi Petrefactus.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 1 (1670), 57–60.Google Scholar
Reiske, Johannes. Dissertatio qua pinacothecas cimeliothecas et societates doctorum in Europa praecipuas breviter explicare. Wolfenbüttel: Bismarck, 1685.Google Scholar
Reiske, Johannes. “Exercitatio historico-physica de cornu Hammonis.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 2, An. 10 (1689), 202.Google Scholar
Reiske, Johannes. De Glossopetris Luneburgensibus. Nürnberg: Zieger, 1682.Google Scholar
Reyher, Andreas. Lexicon Latino-Germanicum, ed. Reyher, Samuel. Leipzig: Brand, 1686.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. Ad oculi demonstrationem opticam curiosos. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. De aere. Kiel: Reumann, 1669.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. Experimentum novum, quo aquae marinae dulcedo describitur. Kiel: Reuman, 1697.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. Mathesis Mosaica. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev. Jacobi â Mellen … Relatio.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (March 1699), 88–96.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev. “J. â M. Uberior declaratio.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (July 1699), 219–24.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev. “J. â M. Descriptio antiquissimi cujusdam Luci.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (Sept. 1699), 286–8.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev, and Rhode, Andreas Albert. Cimbrisch-Holsteinische Antiquitäten-Remarques. Hamburg: Felginer, 1720.Google Scholar
Ridemann, Heinrich. Institutiones architecturae militaris. Rostock: Kilius, 1674.Google Scholar
Rolfink, Werner. De vegetabilibus, plantis, suffruticibus, fruticibus, arboribus in genere libri duo. Jena: Werther, 1670.Google Scholar
Rolle, Johannes (respondens), and Sachs, Philipp Jacob (praeses). Anthropologia. Leipzig: Hönius 1648.Google Scholar
Rudbeck, Olaus. Atlantica. 4 vols. Uppsala: Curio, 1679–1702.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Johann Christoph.Vitae clarissimorum in re literaria Virorum. Part 7. Wittenberg: Ludwig, 1708.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Ampelographia sive Vitis Viniferae ejusque partium consideratio physico-philologico-historico-medico-chymica … ad normam collegii naturae curiosorum instituta plurimus jucundis secretis naturae, artisque locupletata. Leipzig: Trescher, 1661.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Gammaralogia, sive Gammarorum vulgo Cancrorum consideratio physico-philologico-historico-medico-chymica. Leipzig: Fellgiebel, 1665.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 1 (1670), 60–1.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 1 (1670), 296–8.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Oceanus Macro-Microcosmicus. Wrocław: Fellgiebel, 1664.Google Scholar
Sa’di, Abu ‘Abd Allah Musharrif al-Din. Persianischer Rosenthal, trans. Hakk-wirdi, and Olearius, Adam. Hamburg: Nauman, 1654.Google Scholar
Scherz, Johann Georg (praeses), and Saltzmann, Balthasar Friedrich (respondens). Disputatio moralis de polypragmosynē. Strasbourg: Maagius, 1705.Google Scholar
Schippel, Johann Nicolaus (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De usu et abusu mercurii in lue venerea. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Salomon (respondens), and Silchmüller, Johann (praeses). De pinacothecis. Leipzig: Georg, 1668.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johann Ludwig (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De amaurosi vel gutta serena. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Schott, Gaspar. Technica curiosa. Nuremberg: Endter, 1664.Google Scholar
Schottel, Justus Georg. Teutsche Sprachkunst. Braunschweig: Gruber, 1641.Google Scholar
Schramm, Gottlieb Georg (respondens), and Sennert, Michael (praeses). De cerebro. Wittenberg: Wendt, 1662.Google Scholar
Schroeck, Lucas. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 2, An. 4. (1683), 126–8.Google Scholar
Schröder, Johannes von. Geschichte und Beschreibung der Stadt. Schleswig: self-published, 1827.Google Scholar
Schwarze, Nicolaus Hermann. Nachrichten von der Stadt Kiel. Flensburg: Serringhausen, 1775.Google Scholar
Scilla, Agostino. La vana speculazione disingannata dal senso (1673), trans. Palmer, Rodney, Williams, Rosemary, and Bernocchi, Ilaria. Cambridge: Sedgwick Museum, 2016.Google Scholar
Seger, Georg. De curiositate physica. Gdansk: Rhetius, 1675.Google Scholar
Seger, Georg. Synopsis methodica rariorum. Copenhagen: Holst, 1653.Google Scholar
Sennert, Andreas. Exercitationum Theologicarum Trias: Quibus I. Theologia … II. Anthropologia & III Christologia … dictis S.S. Scripturae totius extantioribus illustranturque ut de Religionis Christiano-evangelicae articulorum praecipuorum. Wittenberg: Meyer, 1667.Google Scholar
Sennert, Johann Andreas (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De lacte lunae. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Seyboth, Johann Georg (respondens), and Kirchmaier, Sebastian (praeses). De corporibus petrificatis. Wittenberg: Henckel, 1664.Google Scholar
Societas Disquirentium. Historia Societatis Disquirentium. Jena: Werther, 1683.Google Scholar
Societas Pythagorea. Erhard Weigelii … Tectratyn. Jena: Werther, 1672.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Anthropologia physica. Wittenberg: Berger, 1647.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Defensio tractatus de origine formarum. Wittenberg: Fincel, 1638.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Institutiones Physicae. Lübeck: Jeger, 1646.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Oratio de physica lucente. Wittenberg: Rohner, 1634.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Synopsis Anthropologiae physicae. Wittenberg: Berger, 1650.Google Scholar
Steno, Nicholas. De solido intra solidum. Florence: Stella, 1669.Google Scholar
Stieler, Kaspar von. Kurze Lehrschrift von der Hochteutschen Sprachkunst. Nuremberg: Hofmann, 1691.Google Scholar
Spon, Jacob. Miscellanea Eruditae Antiquitatis. Lyon: Huguetan, 1685.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas. The History of the Royal Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London: Martin and Allestry, 1667.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De affectibus gravidarum. Halle: Henckel, 1708.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De certitudine artis medicae. Halle: Henckel, 1698.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De febribus. Halle: Henckel, 1709.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De medicina medicinae curiosae. Halle: Henckel, 1714.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De medicinae et chirurgiae perpetuo nexu. Halle: Krebs, 1705.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De mutatione temperamenti. Halle: Henckel, 1712.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. Opusculum Chymico-physico-medicum. Halle: Orphanage, 1715.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De scriptis suis. Halle: Orphanage, 1707.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De testimoniis medicis. NA: NA, 1706.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De vera diversitate corporis. Halle: Orphanage, 1707.Google Scholar
Stelluti, Francesco. “Tractatus de Ligno Fossili Minerali noviter detecto, trans. J.D. Major.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix, Dec. 1, An. 3 (1672), 606–16.Google Scholar
Struve, Burckhard Gotthelf. Introductio ad notitiam rei litterariae. Jena: Bailliar, 1706.Google Scholar
Sturm, Johann Christoph. Collegium curiosum, sive experimentale. Nuremberg: Endter, 1676, 1685.Google Scholar
Sturm, Leonhard Christoph. Die geöffnete Raritäten- und Naturalienkammer. Hamburg: Schiller, 1704.Google Scholar
Suhm, Peter Friedrich von. “Gedanken über die Schwierigkeiten.” In Historische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Kopenhagen. Vol. 1. Kiel: NA, 1782, 353–464.Google Scholar
Tatter, Georg Martin (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Disputationem anatomicam de sanguine peridromo. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Tentzel, Wilhelm. Monatliche Unterredungen. Leipzig: NA, 1689–98.Google Scholar
Tidicaeus, Franciscus. Humanitatis horizon, id est, conformata hominis cum mundo commendatio. Leipzig: Nerlich, 1638.Google Scholar
Tollius, Jacob. Epistolae itinerariae, ed. Hennin, Heinrich. Amsterdam: Halm, 1700.Google Scholar
Torquatus, Alexander Julius. Christianae-Albertinae inauguratio. NA: NA, 1666.Google Scholar
Tralles, Johann Christian (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De malacia. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Tribbechow, Adam. De doctoribus scholasticis et corrupta per eos divinarum humanarumque rerum scientia. Giessen: Wellstein, 1665.Google Scholar
Tribbechow, Adam. Historia Naturalismi. Jena: Krebs, 1700Google Scholar
Trismegistus, Hermes Mercurius. His Divine Pymander. London: Brewster, 1657.Google Scholar
Upmarck, Johann (praeses), and Lund, Christian (respondens). Dissertatio philosophica de polypragmosynē. Uppsala: Werner, 1706.Google Scholar
Valentini, Christoph Bernhard. Disputatio inauguralis medica de ceraunia. Giessen: Vulpian, 1717.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Armamentarium naturae. Giessen: Müller, 1709.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Epistola de natura naturae, ad R. Boyle. Giessen: Müller, 1689.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. “Historiae literariae medicae S.R.I. Acad. Nat. Cur.” 8 parts. Miscellanea curiosa Appendix (1685–1700).Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Historiae literariae S.R.I. academiae naturae curiosorum. Giessen: Müller, 1708.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Historia physices experimentalis. Giessen: Müller, 1688.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Instructiones physicae moderno seculo accomodatae. Giessen: Müller, 1691.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Microcosmi tortura medica convulsio. Giessen: Karger, 1680.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Museum Museorum. Frankfurt: Zunner, 1704, 1714.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Praxis medicinae infallibilis. Frankfurt: Sande, 1711.Google Scholar
Viète, François. Opera mathematica. Leiden: Elzevier, 1646.Google Scholar
Vitruvius, Marcus. Architectura. Venice: Crugher, 1567.Google Scholar
Vockerodt, Gottfried. Commentatio de eruditorum societatibus. Gotha: Schall, 1704.Google Scholar
Volckmann, Georg Anton. Silesia subterannea. Leipzig: Weidmann, 1720.Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerard Jan. Ars Historica. Leiden: Maire, 1623.Google Scholar
Wagner, Georg Friedrich (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Disquisitio de spiritibus. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Ad plantas laete Virentes, & Flores Versicolores, in Vicinis pratis, Sylvis & Campus perlustrandas. Kiel: Reumann, 1696.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Brevis adumbratio Collegii Anatomici privati. Kiel: Reumann, 1692.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Collegium physico-experimentale. Kiel: Reuther, 1711.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Disputationem inauguralem viri nobilissimi et clarissimi Georgii Krysingii, Practici Flensburgensis. Kiel: Reuther, 1728.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Excursiones botanicas. Kiel: NA, 1712.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Index Librorum … Wil. Hulderici Waldtschmiedt … collectorum. Kiel: 1731.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Kurtze und Gründliche Beschreibung Derer Aloen. Kiel: Riechel, 1705.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. “Memoria Majoriana.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix, Dec. 3, An. 5–6 (1697–8), 185–206.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Memoria Majoriana. Frankfurt: Froberg, 1705.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Programma de vegetabilium usu eximio in medicina. Kiel: Reuther, 1708.Google Scholar
Wedel, Georg Wolfgang. Non-Entia Chimica. Frankfurt: Götz, 1670.Google Scholar
Wedel, Georg Wolfgang. Propemticum inaugurale de medicamine faciei. Jena: Krebs, 1695.Google Scholar
Weickman, Christoph. Exoticophylacium Weickmannianum. NA: NA, 1659.Google Scholar
Weigel, Erhard. Die Fried-und Nutzbringende Kunst-Weißheit. Jena: Bauhofer, 1673.Google Scholar
Welsch, Georg Hieronymus. Hecatosteae II. Augsburg: Goebel, 1675.Google Scholar
Welsch, Georg Hieronymus. De vena medinensi. Augsburg: Goebel, 1674.Google Scholar
Wernicke, Christian. Poetischer Versuch. Hamburg: Hertel, 1704.Google Scholar
Wiegand, Georg Ernst (respondens), and Sperling, Johann (praeses). Lithologia. Wittenberg: Wendt, 1657.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. Cerebri anatome. London: Roycroft, 1664.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. Diatribae duæ medico-philosophicæ quarum prior agit de fermentatione, sive, de motu intestino particularum in quovis corpore: altera de febribus, sive, de motu earundem in sanguine animalium. London: Roycroft, 1659.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. A Medical-Philosophical Discourse of Fermentation. London: Dring, 1681.Google Scholar
Wittich, Johannes. Von dem Ligno Guyaco … und von dem Grießholtz, so man Lignum Nephriticum nennet. Leipzig: NA, 1589.Google Scholar
Worm, Ole. Museum Wormianum. Leiden: Elzevier, 1655.Google Scholar
Wowern, Johann von. De polymathia tractatio. Hamburg: Froben, 1603.Google Scholar
Wowern, Johann von. De polymathia tractatio. Leipzig: Cörner, 1665.Google Scholar
Wurffbain, Friedrich Sigimund (respondens), and Moller, Daniel Wilhelm (praeses). Dissertatio de technophysiotameis. Altdorf: NA, 1704.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Academy of the Curious about Nature. Index generalis … Dec. I et II ephemeridum Germanicarum. Nuremberg: Endter, 1695.Google Scholar
Academy of the Curious about Nature. “Sacri Romani Imperii Academiae Naturae Curiosorum Auctae & Reformatae Leges,” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 2 1671, [h2v].Google Scholar
Agricola, Georg. De animantibus subterraneis. Basel: Froben, 1549.Google Scholar
Albert, Heinrich. Arien. Leipzig: Cellarius, 1657.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich. Compendium lexici philosophici. Herborn: Corvinus, 1626.Google Scholar
Amthor, Christoph Heinrich (as Anastasius Sincerus). Project der Oeconomie in Form einer Wissenschaft. Frankfurt: NA, 1717 [1716].Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Johannes Molleri … Isagoge.” Acta Eruditorum (Feb. 1692), 94–5.Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Notitia Musei Cimbrici B. D. Joh. Danielis Majoris.” Nova literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (Nov. 1698), 213–8.Google Scholar
Anonymous. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa 1 1670, 265.Google Scholar
Arnkiel, Troels. Cimbrische Heyden-Religion. 4 parts. Hamburg: Wiering, 1702.Google Scholar
Aroselius, Laurentius (respondens), and Watson, Michael (praeses). De historia ante diluviana. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Advancement of Learning. London: Tomes, 1605.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. De dignitate et augmentis scientiarum. London: Haviland, 1623.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Sylva sylvarum. London: Lee, 1628.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Caspar. Anatomicae institutiones corporis humani … cum plurimis novis observationibus & opinionibus, nec non illustriorum, quae in Anthropologia occurrunt, controversiarum decisionibus. Rostock: Ferber, 1622.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Erasmus. De naturae mirabilibus quaestiones academicae. Copenhagen: Haubold, 1674.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Ad D. Jo. Dan. Majorem, in nova Academia Chiloniensi Profess. & Sponsum.” In Carmina. Copenhagen: Paulli, 1666.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Confectio Alkermes Danica.” Acta Hafniensia 1 (1671), 80–1.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. Domus anatomica. Copenhagen: Haubold, 1662.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Excellentissimorum medicorum Judicia.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 2 (1671), [c4v].Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. De medicina Danorum domestica. Copenhagen: Haubold, 1666.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “Rariora in officinis quibusdam Pharmaceuticis.” Acta Hafniensia 1 (1671), 73–8.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “De Succino experimenta.” Acta Hafniensia 1 (1671), 111–14.Google Scholar
Bartholin, Thomas. “De Theriaca Danica & succini generatione.” Acta Hafniensia 2 (1672), 306.Google Scholar
Bausch, Johann Lorenz. Schediasmata bina curiosa de lapide haematite et aetite. Leipzig: Trescher, 1665.Google Scholar
Becher, Johann Joachim. Methodus Didactica. Munich: Maria Magdalena Schellin, 1668.Google Scholar
Becher, Johann Joachim. Politische Discurs. Frankfurt: Zunner, 1688.Google Scholar
Beyer, Johann Jacob. De meritis Germanorum in rem medicam. Altdorf: Meyer, 1704.Google Scholar
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. Über die natürlichen Verschiedenheiten im Menschengeschlechte. Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1798.Google Scholar
Boccone, Paolo. Recherches et Observations Naturelles. Paris: Barbin 1671.Google Scholar
Bödiker, Johannes. Grund-Sätze der Deutschen Sprachen. Cologne: Liebpert, 1690.Google Scholar
Borel, Pierre. Les antiquitez, raretez, plantes, minéraux & autres choses considérables de la ville et comté de Castres … Avec le role des principaux cabinets et autres raretez de l’Europe, comme aussi le catalogue des choses rares de maistre Pierre Borel. Castres: Colomiez, 1649.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Certain Physiological Essays. London: Herringman, 1661.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours. London: Herringman, 1664.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Some Considerations Touching the Usefulnesse of Experimental Naturall Philosophy. Oxford: Hall, 1664.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. Tractatus de cosmicis rerum qualitatibus, trans. Morhof, D. G.. Amsterdam: Janssonius a Waesberge, 1671.Google Scholar
Bremer, Asmus. Chronicon Kiliense tragicum-curiosum, 1432–1717, ed. Stern, Moritz. Kiel: Fiencke, 1916.Google Scholar
de Bremond, M. Table des Mémoires imprimés dans les Transactions Philosophiques de la Société Royale de Londres depuis 1665 jusques en 1735. Paris: Piget, 1739.Google Scholar
Brenner, Sophie. Samlade Poetiska Dikter, af Sophia Elisabeth Brenner. Upsala: Hansel, 1873.Google Scholar
Briet, Philippe. Annales mundi, sive Chronicon universale. Augsburg: Rencard, 1696.Google Scholar
Broctorf, Detlev (respondens), and Reyher, Samuel (praeses). De rege mathematico. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Büchner, Andrea Elias. Academiae … naturae curiosorum historia. Halle: Gebauer, 1755.Google Scholar
Buoninsegna, Francesco. Satyra Menippea, oder Straff-Schrifft Weiblicher Pracht, trans. Major, Johann Daniel. Hamburg: Wulff, 1683.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. Erinnerungen aus Rubens. Basel: Lendorff, 1898.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. “The Great Men of History.” In Reflections on History. London: Allen & Unwin, 1943, 172–203.Google Scholar
Busse, Martinus (respondens), and Thomasius, Jacob (praeses). De doctoribus scholasticis latinis. Leipzig: Coler, 1676.Google Scholar
de Candolle, A. P. Théorie Élémentaire de la Botanique. Paris: Déterville, 1813.Google Scholar
Capell, Joachim Ernst (respondens), and Hannemann, Johann Ludwig (praeses). Dissertatio physica systematis caeli et terrae auream catenam exhibens. Kiel: Reuther, 1710.Google Scholar
Capell, Rudolf. Nummophylacium Luederianum. Hamburg: Rebenlin, 1679.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. London: Piccadilly, 1852.Google Scholar
Cassius, Andreas. De … auro. Hamburg: Wolff, 1685.Google Scholar
Cassius, Andreas. De triumviratu intestinali cum suis effervescentiis, repetita disputatio. Hamburg: Placidius, 1669.Google Scholar
Cassius, Andreas (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De febre artificiali. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Clarke, Timothy. “A Letter.” Philosophical Transactions 3 (1668), 672–82.Google Scholar
Clauder, Gabriel. De tinctura universali. Altenburg: Richter, 1678.Google Scholar
Clausner, Georg (respondens), and Feuerlein, Jacob Wilhelm (praeses). Disputatio inauguralis de polymathia philosophica. Altdorf: Meyer, 1718.Google Scholar
Cogel, Friedrich. Melpomene Cassiana, Praefica. Lübeck: Schmalhertz, 1677.Google Scholar
Cohausen, Johann Heinrich. Ossilegium historico-physicum. Frankfurt: Fuhrman, 1714.Google Scholar
Coler, Christoph. Oratio Nuptialis. Brega: Tschorn, 1653.Google Scholar
Coles, Elisha. A Dictionary, English-Latin, and Latin-English. London: Richardson, 1679.Google Scholar
Colonna, Fabio. De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Comes, Natalis. Mythologiae. Frankfurt: Wechel, 1588.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. De Germanicorum corporum habitus antiqui ac novi causis. Helmstedt: Muller, 1645.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. In universam artem medicam, ed. Schellhammer, G. C.. Helmstedt: Hamm, 1687.Google Scholar
Crusius, Johann (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Disputatio medica quam de aurea catena Jovis coelo demissa. Kiel: Reumann, 1685.Google Scholar
Danckwerth, Caspar. Newe Landesbeschreibung Der Zwey Hertzogthümer Schleswich und Holstein. Husum: Petersen, 1652.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Explicatio machinarum vel instrumentorum, trans. Major, Johann Daniel. Kiel: Reumann, 1672.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. Encyclopédie. Vol. 9. Geneva: Pella, 1777.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Johann (respondens) and Franck, Christopher (praeses). De abditis rerum sublimium arcanis, Schediasma Inaugurale. Kiel: Reumann, 1683.Google Scholar
Dodart, Denis. “Extrait d’une Lettre escrite par Monsieur Dodart à l’Auteur du Journal, au sujet du Mangeur de Feu, dont il est parlé dans le quatriéme Journal de cette Année.” Journal des sçavans (July 19, 1678), 222–32.Google Scholar
Eckhard, Martin (respondens), and Waldschmidt, Johann Jacob (praeses). Disputatio physica de colore aethiopum. Marburg: Kürsner, 1683.Google Scholar
Elrod, Cosmas (respondens), and Kortholt, Christian (praeses), De religione ethnica, Muhammedana, et judaica. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Johann Albert. De hominibus orbis nostri incolis specie et ortu avito inter se non differentibus. Hamburg: NA, 1721.Google Scholar
Fardella, Michael Angelo. Animae humanae naturae ab Augustino detecta. Venice: Albriccio, 1698.Google Scholar
Feind, Barthold. Relationes curiosae. Hamburg: Reumann, 1705.Google Scholar
Francisci, Erasmus. Ost- und West-Indianischer wie auch Sinesischer Lust- und Stats-Garten. Nuremberg: Endter, 1668.Google Scholar
Francisci, Erasmus. Der Wunder-reiche Uberzug [sic] unserer Nider-Welt. Nuremberg: Endter, 1680.Google Scholar
French Academy of Sciences. Another Collection of Philosophical Conferences of the French Virtuosi. London: Dring and Starkey, 1665.Google Scholar
Garmann, Christian Friedrich. Epistolarum centuria. Rostock: Garmann, 1714.Google Scholar
Gerike, Peter. Dissertatio inauguralis medica de studio novitatis in medicina. Altorf: Meyer, 1721.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph. Plus Ultra: or, the Progress and Advancement of Knowledge since the Days of Aristotle. London: Collins, 1668.Google Scholar
Gramm, Caeso. Chilonium Novus Holsatiæ Parnassus. Schleswig: Holwein, 1665.Google Scholar
Gröning, Johann. Das Geöfnete Müntz-Cabinet. Hamburg: Schiller, 1700.Google Scholar
Gröning, Johann. Historia Numismatico-critica. Hamburg: Schiller, 1700.Google Scholar
Gundling, Nicolaus Hieronymus. Vollständige Historie der Gelahrheit. Vol. 4. Leipzig: Spring, 1736.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Aetiologia philosophico-medica curiosa facultatis purgatricis … contra Willisum et Willisianos. Hamburg: Lichtenstein, 1677.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. “Anatome Aethiopis faeminae.” Acta Hafniensia 4 (1675), 50–1.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Curiosum scrutinium nigredinis posterorum Cham i.e. Aethioipium. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Fasciculus miscellanearum quaestionum sexaginta. Bremen: Wessel, 1672.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Nova Ars Clymastica, Enervata. Stade: Holwein, 1670.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Ovum Hermetico-Paracelsico-Trismegistum. Frankfurt: Knoch, 1694.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. “Porismata de luce.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix, Dec. 2, An. 5 (1686), 562–4.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Prodromus Lexici, Utriusque Medicinae Practicae. Hamburg: Naumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. Ruach Universalis mundo restitutus. Stade: Holwein, 1670.Google Scholar
Hannemann, Johann Ludwig. “De Scopelismis Cymbricis.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 2, An. 4. (1683), 124–6.Google Scholar
Happel, Eberhard Werner. Relationes curiosae. Hamburg: Wiering, 1681–91.Google Scholar
Happel, Eberhard Werner. Der Teutsche Carl. Ulm: Wagner, 1690.Google Scholar
Heiden, Gottfried Prosper Johann (respondens), and Ridemann, Heinrich (praeses). De camera obscura. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Hermann, Leonhard David. Maslographia. Brieg: Gründer, 1711.Google Scholar
Herttenstein, Johann Friedrich (respondens), and Sebisch, Melchior (praeses). De origine fontium. Strasbourg: NA, 1699.Google Scholar
Hesporn, Franz (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Positiones medicae variae. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Holyk, Georg. New-vermehrtes vierfaches Garten-Büchlein. Frankfurt: Ritschel, 1707.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert. Micrographia. London: Martyn, 1665.Google Scholar
Hubert, Robert. A catalogue of many natural rarities. London: NA, 1664.Google Scholar
Jenquel, Kaspar Friedrich. Museographia. Breslau: Hubert, 1727.Google Scholar
Juch, Paul Florian (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De moderamine conspirationis. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
Juncker, Christian. De ephemeridibus. Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1692.Google Scholar
Juncker, Johann. Conspectus medicinae theoretico-practicae. Halle: Orphanage, 1718.Google Scholar
Jung, Georg Sebastian. “Observatio CXI: Crucifixus.” Miscellanea curiosa 1 (1670), 261.Google Scholar
Jung, Georg Sebastian. “Observatio CXIII. Imago B. Mariae Virginis cum Filiolo.” Miscellanea curiosa 1 (1670), 264–5.Google Scholar
Kanold, Johann. Sammlung. Wrocław: Hubert, 1719.Google Scholar
Kiel, University of. Chronicles and schedules of lectures (1665–2000). https://dibiki.ub.uni-kiel.de/viewer/toc/PPN612166120/1/LOG_0000/.Google Scholar
Kielmannsegg, Friedrich Christian von. Bibliotheca Kielmans-Eggiana, 4 vols. Hamburg: Trausold, 1718–21.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Johann Jacob (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De tactis fulmine. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius. Ars magna lucis et umbrae. Rome: Grignani, 1646.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius. Mundus Subterraneus. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Weyerstrat, 1665.Google Scholar
Kirchmaier, Georg Caspar. Epistolae clarisssimorum virorum ad Georg Casp. Kirchmaierum. Wittenberg: Ludwig, 1703.Google Scholar
Kleffel, Johann Christoph. Abhandlungen von den Vorzügen der alten Nordischen Seekunst vor den Römern und Griechen. 5 vols. Kiel: NA, 1753–64.Google Scholar
Kleffel, Johann Christoph. Antiquitates Germanorum. Frankfurt: Paulli, 1733.Google Scholar
Köhler, Johann David, ed. Sylloge aliquot scriptorium de bene ordinanda et ornanda bibliotheca. Frankfurt: Stein, 1728.Google Scholar
Kortholt, Sebastian. de Bibliotheca academiae Kiloniensis. Kiel: Reuther, 1705.Google Scholar
Kranz, Gottlob. Memorabilia bibliothecae Elisabethanae Wratislaviensis. Wrocław: Steck, 1699.Google Scholar
Krysing, Georg. Cimbrischen Heiden-Antiquitäten. Flensburg: Vogel, 1734.Google Scholar
Kunckel, Johann. Chymische Anmerckungen … mit Anhang einer Chymischen Brille contra Non-Entia Chymica. Wittenberg: Fincel, 1677.Google Scholar
Kundmann, Johann Christian. “Neue Entdeckung.” Sammlung von Natur- und Medicin- wie auch hierzu gehörigen Kunst- und Literatur-Geschichten 23 (1723), 171–88.Google Scholar
Lachmund, Friedrich. De ave diomedea. Amsterdam: Frisius, 1674.Google Scholar
Lachmund, Friedrich. Oryctographia Hildesheimensis sive admirandorum fossilium, quae in tractu Hildesheimensi reperiuntur, descriptio. Hildesheim: Müller, 1669.Google Scholar
de Laet, Jan. De gemmis. Leiden: Maire, 1647.Google Scholar
Langelott, Joel. “Epistola.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 3 (1672), 96–105.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. Mr. Le Clerc’s Judgment and Censure of Dr. Bentley’s Horace. London: Taylor, 1713.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. Physica. Amsterdam: Gallet, 1696.Google Scholar
de Lengerken, Hermann (respondens), and Johann Daniel Major (praeses). De aerumnis gigantum. Kiel: Reumann, 1689.Google Scholar
de Lengerken, Hermann (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De aerumnis gigantum. Kiel: Reumann, 1676.Google Scholar
Lambeck, Peter. Liber Primus Prodromi historiae literariae. Hamburg: Piper, 1659.Google Scholar
Lather, Hermann. De censu. Frankfurt: Jennis, 1618.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Guilielmi Pacidi Plus ultra seu introductio et specimina Methodi arcanae de Instauratione et Augmentis Scientiarum ad communem felicitatem.” In Philosophische Schriften. Vol. 4, 1677–June 1690, ed. Schepers, Heinrich, Schneider, Martin, Biller, Gerhard, Franke, Ursula, and Kliege-Biller, Herma. Berlin: Akademie, 1999, 971–80.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Oeuvres. Vol. 7, ed. de Careil, A. Foucer. Paris: Fimin Didot, 1875.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Paraenesis de Scientia Generali.” In Philosophische Schriften. Vol. 4, 1677–June 1690, ed. Schepers, Heinrich, Schneider, Martin, Biller, Gerhard, Franke, Ursula, and Kliege-Biller, Herma. Berlin: Akademie, 1999, 677–85.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophischer Briefwechsel, 1686–1694. Berlin: Akademie, 2009.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Politische Schriften, ed. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften/Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin: Akademie, 1983.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Berlin: Akademie, 1923–present.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Unvorgreiffliche Gedanken betreffend die Ausübung und Verbesserung der Teutschen Sprache.” In Opera Omnia. Vol. 6, Part 2. Geneva: NA, 1768.Google Scholar
Liebknecht, Johann Georg. Grund-Sätze der … Mathematischen Wissenschafften. Frankfurt: Lammers, 1726.Google Scholar
Lilienthal, Michael. De historia literaria certae cujusdam gentis scribenda consultatio. Leipzig: Russworm 1710.Google Scholar
Lilienthal, Michael. De Machiavellismo literario sive de perversis quorundam in Republica Literaria inclarescendi artibus dissertatio historico-moralis. Leipzig: Boye, 1713.Google Scholar
Loredano, Giovan Francesco. “Indice de’ Letterati, che con le Stampe hanno nominato l’Auttore.” In Opere. Venice: Guerigli, 1661, [*8r].Google Scholar
Madai, David Samuel von. Verzeichniß der auserlesenen Talersammlung des … David Samuel von Madai. Hamburg: NA, 1788.Google Scholar
Major, Detlev Johann (respondens), and Stryk, Elias August (praeses), Dissertatio juridica de proclamatione et banno homicidae fugitivi. Kiel: Reumann, 1692.Google Scholar
Major, Elias. Schediasmata Germanica. Öls: Seyffert, 1657.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De Acheronte Orphei, vel umbilico maris Homerico, disquisitio Hydrographica, in qua quoddam Kircheri Assertum, in Dubium vocatur. Hamburg: Wolff, 1688.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad collegium anatomicum, de oculo humano, chamaeleontis, noctuae, ac aliorum animalium. Kiel: Reumann, 1690.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad disputationem inauguralem quam de amaurosi vel gutta serena invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad oculi declarationem anatomicam curiosos. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Ad … Sebastianum Schefferum … Conringianam artis medicae introductionem … Adhortatione. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Americanische … Aloe. Schleswig: Holwein, 1668.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Anatomen Cygni. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Anatomen Kiloniensem Primam, in corpore humano. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Anatomen, literato quovis dignam. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Annotationes ad Columnam de Purpura,” in Colonna, Fabio, De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675, n.p.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Bevölckertes Cimbrien. Plön: Schmied, 1692.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Chirurgia infusoria. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “De citro in citro.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 3 (1672), 432–3.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Collegium medico-curiosum. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Consideratio ferri radiantis … & incidenter quaedam de thermis, novo artificio parandis. Schleswig: Holwein, 1679.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Consideratio Physiologica occurentium quorundam in nuper-editis Epistolis duabus Dn. Franc. Jos. Burrhi, De Cerebro & Oculis: ad Dn. D. Th. Bartholinum scriptis. Kiel: Reumann, 1669.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Deliciae hybernae, sive tria nova inventa medica. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Dictionarium Ostralogicum,” in Colonna, Fabio, De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675, n.p.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Doctrinae de Testaceis in Ordinem congruum redactae Specimen, Tabulis … quàm caeteroquin inserviturum facilè ad Conchylia et Testacea reliquia, in Conclavibus Principum ac allis, recte disponenda,” in Colonna, Fabio, De purpura, ed. Major, J. D.. Kiel: Reumann, 1675, n.p.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Emblemata de Purpura Reyherianae. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Genius errans, sive de ingeniorum in scientiis abusu dissertatio. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Grosses Reichthum/zusammengebracht aus den meisten Schätzen der Welt: oder Interims-Discurs von Kunst-und Naturalien-Kammern. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Hadria gloriosa. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Historia anatomes Kiloniensis primae. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Historia anatomica calculorum … in renibus … J. Sperlingii, repertorum. Leipzig: Hahn, 1662.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Index Alphabeticus. NA, 1674.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De inventis a se thermis artificialibus succinatis. Kiel: Reumann, 1680.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Joh. Danielis Horstii judicium de chirurgia infusoria. Frankfurt: Fickwirt, 1665.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Kilonii.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (June 1698), 99.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Medicinae … Practicae … Tabula Sciagraphica, nos. 1–27. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Memoria Sachsiana. Leipzig: Fritsch, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Memoriale Anatomico-Miscellaneum. Kiel: Reumann, 1669.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Musei Cimbrici … Aditus I. Kiel: Reumann, 1689.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Musei Cimbrici … Aditus II. Kiel: Reumann, 1689.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Museum Cimbricum. Plön: Schmidt, 1688.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De nummis Graece inscriptis. Kiel: Richel, 1685.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De nummis Rehdigerianis. Kiel: Reumann, 1681.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De nummorum aerugine, consultatio epistolica. Kiel: NA, 1685.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. De planta monstrosa Gottorpiensi mensis Junii, Anni MDCLXV ubi quaedam de Coalescentiâ Stirpium & Circulatione Succi Nutritii per easdem proferunt. Schleswig: Holwein, 1665.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Prodromus Atlanticae. Kiel: Reumann, 1691.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Prodromus inventae a se chirurgiae infusoriae. Leipzig: Wittigau,1664.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Programma quo … disputationem … de petechiis … invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1681.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Prospectus praeliminaris in theatrum profundae scientiae, sive de concipiendâ anatome nova, breve consilium. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Rei anatomicae. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Roma in nummis augustalibus germanizans. Kiel: Richel, 1684.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Scholion,” to Johann Daniel Major, “Epulis et verruca linguae feliciter curatae.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 2 (1671), 381–2.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Scholion anatomicum ad textum quendam Imp. Justiniani. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. See-Farth nach der Neuen Welt ohne Schiff und Segel. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. See-Farth nach der Neuen Welt ohne Schiff und Segel. Hamburg: Wolff, 1683.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Serapus Radiatus, medicus Aegyptiorum Deus, ex metallo et gemma. Kiel: Richel, 1685.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Summaria medicinae biblicae … tabula. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. “Udtog af Majors Reise i Danmark 1693.” In Suhm, Peter Fredrik, ed., Nye samlinger til den danske historie. Vol. III. Copenhagen: Poulsen, 1794, 125–34.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Unvorgreiffliches Bedencken von Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern insgemein. Kiel: Reumann, 1674.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Vorstellung etlicher Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern in America und Asia. Kiel: Reumann, 1674.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Vorstellung etlicher Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern in Italien zu Neapolis und Alt-Rom. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel. Vorstellung etlicher Kunst- und Naturalien-Kammern in Africa und an Gräntzen Europae. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel, and Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Dissertatio epistolica de cancris et serpentibus petrefactis … cui accessit … de miranda lapidum natura. Jena: Fellgiebel, 1664.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel (respondens), and Schneider, Conrad Victor (praeses). De lacrymis. Wittenberg: Haken, 1656.Google Scholar
Major, Johann Daniel (respondens), and Sperling, Johann (praeses), Theses Anthropologicas de Pulmone. Wittenberg: Wendt, 1655.Google Scholar
Majus, Johann Burchard. Seinen Vorschlag wegen der künfftig anzustellenden Gelehrten Unterredungen. Kiel: NA, 1697.Google Scholar
March, Caspar. Ad spectandum … dispensationem… quam Dn. Johan Caspar Adophi instituet … invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1665.Google Scholar
March, Caspar. Ad spectandum … dispensationem… quam Dn. Fridericus Bereiter … instituet … invitat. Kiel: Reumann, 1671.Google Scholar
March, Caspar Jr. (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Theses medicae inaugurales de motu et sensu abolito in affectibus soporosis. Kiel: Reumann, 1680.Google Scholar
Maty, Paul Henry. A General Index to the Philosophical Transactions, from the First to the End of the Seventieth Volume. London: Davis and Elmsly, 1787.Google Scholar
Meibom, Heinrich. Programma … ad anatomen corporis foeminini in novo theatro primam. Helmstedt: Müller, 1673.Google Scholar
Meibom, Heinrich. De vasis palpebrarum novis epistola. Hamburg: Muller, 1666.Google Scholar
Melle, Jacob van. Historia urnae sepulcralis Sarmatica anno 1674 repertae. Jena: Krebs, 1679.Google Scholar
Mentzel, Christian. “De Chelonitide.” Miscellanea curiosa (1687), 3–4.Google Scholar
Mentzel, Christian. “De lapidibus admirandis.” Miscellanea curiosa (1687), 1–2.Google Scholar
Mercati, Michele. Metallotheca. Rome: Salvioni, 1717.Google Scholar
Mercklin, Georg Abraham. Cynosura medica, sive de scriptis medicis liber II. Nuremberg: Endter, 1686.Google Scholar
Mercklin, Georg Abraham. “Epistola … de Scriptis medicis.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix (1684), 588–92.Google Scholar
Meyer, Georg (respondens), and Tribbechow, Adam (praeses). De philosophia morum inter barbaros praecipue orientales. Kiel: Reumann, 1666.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Johann Daniel. Raisonnement über die protestantischen Universitäten in Deutschland. 4 vols. Frankfurt: 1768–76.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Johann Martin. Museum Spenerianum. Leipzig: Fleischer, 1693.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Cimbria literata. Copenhagen: Orphanage, 1744.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Cimbriae literatae prodromus, sive de suis in historia patriae literaria conatibus ad virum perillustrem Marquardum Gudium. Schleswig: Holwein, 1687.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. “Flensburgi.” Nova literaria maris Balthici et septentrionalis (April 1698), 63–8.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. “Hypomnemata Historica.” In Scheffer, Johann, Suecia Literata. Hamburg: Liebezeit, 1698, 419–23.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Introductio in ducatuum Cimbricorum, Slesvicensis et Holsatici, historiam … contra Olaum Rudbeckium & Joh. Dan. Maiorem. Hamburg: Libezeit, 1699.Google Scholar
Möller, Johann. Isagoge ad historiam ducatuum Slesvicensis et Holsatici. Frankurt: Liebezeit, 1691.Google Scholar
Möller, Nicolaus. De Polymathia Verissima et antiqua. Kiel: Richel, 1695.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Dissertationes Academicae & Epistolicae. Hamburg: Liebernickel, 1699.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Epistola de scypho vitreo. Kiel: Reumann, 1672.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. De metallorum transmutatione. Hamburg: Schultze, 1673.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Opera Poëtica. Lubeck: Böckmann, 1697.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Orationes. Hamburg: Liebernickel, 1698.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Polyhistor. 2 parts. Lübeck: Böckmann, 1688–92.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Polyhistor, ed. Möller, Johann. 3 tomes. Lübeck: Böckmann, 1707–47.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. De ratione conscribendarum epistolarum libellus. Lübeck: Böckmann, 1716.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. De scypho vitreo. Kiel: Reumann, 1682.Google Scholar
Morhof, Daniel Georg. Unterricht von der Teutschen Sprache und Poesie. Lübeck: Wiedemeyer, 1700.Google Scholar
Neogard, Nicolaus (respondens), and Heldberg, Georg Ernst (praeses). De primo complexo cognitionis humanae principio, disputatio I. Kiel: Reumann, 1670.Google Scholar
Nyerup, R. Antiquariske Reise til Fyen. Copenhagen: Seidel, 1814.Google Scholar
Oesterling, Johannes (respondens), and Schminck, J. H. (praeses). Dissertatio historica de urnis sepulchralibus et armis lapideis veterum Cattorum. Marburg: Müller, 1714.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Henry. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols., ed. and trans. Hall, A. Rupert and Boas Hall, Marie. London: Taylor & Francis, 1965–86.Google Scholar
Olearius, Adam. Gottorfische Kunst-Kammer. Schleswig: Holwein, 1666.Google Scholar
Olearius, Adam. Kurtzer Begriff einer Holsteinischen Chronic. Schleswig: Holwein, 1663.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John. Theatrum Botanicum. London: Cotes, 1640.Google Scholar
Pasch, Georg. De Novis Inventis. Leipzig: Gross, 1700.Google Scholar
Patin, Charles. Relation. Lyons: Merciére, 1676.Google Scholar
Pechlin, Johann Nicolas. De habitu et colore Aethiopum, qui vulgo nigritae, liber. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Pechlin, Johann Nicolas. Theses de affectibus soporosis. Kiel: Reumann, 1680.Google Scholar
Peedle, Thomas, and Cozbie, Thomas. The Falacie of the Great Water-Drinker Discovered. London: Dunster, 1650.Google Scholar
Peikenkamp, Hermann. Brevis ac necessaria relatio successus exercitii physicotechnici, Marburgensis. NA: NA, 1683.Google Scholar
Petersen, Johann Wilhelm. Memorio … Christiano Cassio. Lübeck: Schmalhertz, 1676.Google Scholar
Placcius, Vincent. Libri a Vincentio Placcio … editi. Hamburg: Liebezeit, 1693.Google Scholar
Placcius, Vincent. De morali scientia augenda. Frankfurt: Zunner, 1677.Google Scholar
Plomann, Andreas (respondens), and Morhof, Daniel Georg (praeses). Dissertatio de paradoxis sensuum. Kiel: Reumann, 1676.Google Scholar
Power, Henry. Experimental Philosophy. London: Martin and Allestry, 1664.Google Scholar
Reimmann, Jacob Friedrich. Versuch einer Einleitung in die Historiam Literariam. Halle: Renger, 1708.Google Scholar
Reisel, Salomon. “Serpens in stomacho Cervi Petrefactus.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 1 (1670), 57–60.Google Scholar
Reiske, Johannes. Dissertatio qua pinacothecas cimeliothecas et societates doctorum in Europa praecipuas breviter explicare. Wolfenbüttel: Bismarck, 1685.Google Scholar
Reiske, Johannes. “Exercitatio historico-physica de cornu Hammonis.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 2, An. 10 (1689), 202.Google Scholar
Reiske, Johannes. De Glossopetris Luneburgensibus. Nürnberg: Zieger, 1682.Google Scholar
Reyher, Andreas. Lexicon Latino-Germanicum, ed. Reyher, Samuel. Leipzig: Brand, 1686.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. Ad oculi demonstrationem opticam curiosos. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. De aere. Kiel: Reumann, 1669.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. Experimentum novum, quo aquae marinae dulcedo describitur. Kiel: Reuman, 1697.Google Scholar
Reyher, Samuel. Mathesis Mosaica. Kiel: Reumann, 1679.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev. Jacobi â Mellen … Relatio.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (March 1699), 88–96.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev. “J. â M. Uberior declaratio.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (July 1699), 219–24.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev. “J. â M. Descriptio antiquissimi cujusdam Luci.” Nova Literaria maris Balthici et Septentrionis (Sept. 1699), 286–8.Google Scholar
Rhode, Christian Detlev, and Rhode, Andreas Albert. Cimbrisch-Holsteinische Antiquitäten-Remarques. Hamburg: Felginer, 1720.Google Scholar
Ridemann, Heinrich. Institutiones architecturae militaris. Rostock: Kilius, 1674.Google Scholar
Rolfink, Werner. De vegetabilibus, plantis, suffruticibus, fruticibus, arboribus in genere libri duo. Jena: Werther, 1670.Google Scholar
Rolle, Johannes (respondens), and Sachs, Philipp Jacob (praeses). Anthropologia. Leipzig: Hönius 1648.Google Scholar
Rudbeck, Olaus. Atlantica. 4 vols. Uppsala: Curio, 1679–1702.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Johann Christoph.Vitae clarissimorum in re literaria Virorum. Part 7. Wittenberg: Ludwig, 1708.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Ampelographia sive Vitis Viniferae ejusque partium consideratio physico-philologico-historico-medico-chymica … ad normam collegii naturae curiosorum instituta plurimus jucundis secretis naturae, artisque locupletata. Leipzig: Trescher, 1661.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Gammaralogia, sive Gammarorum vulgo Cancrorum consideratio physico-philologico-historico-medico-chymica. Leipzig: Fellgiebel, 1665.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 1 (1670), 60–1.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 1, An. 1 (1670), 296–8.Google Scholar
Sachs, Philipp Jacob. Oceanus Macro-Microcosmicus. Wrocław: Fellgiebel, 1664.Google Scholar
Sa’di, Abu ‘Abd Allah Musharrif al-Din. Persianischer Rosenthal, trans. Hakk-wirdi, and Olearius, Adam. Hamburg: Nauman, 1654.Google Scholar
Scherz, Johann Georg (praeses), and Saltzmann, Balthasar Friedrich (respondens). Disputatio moralis de polypragmosynē. Strasbourg: Maagius, 1705.Google Scholar
Schippel, Johann Nicolaus (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De usu et abusu mercurii in lue venerea. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Salomon (respondens), and Silchmüller, Johann (praeses). De pinacothecis. Leipzig: Georg, 1668.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johann Ludwig (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De amaurosi vel gutta serena. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Schott, Gaspar. Technica curiosa. Nuremberg: Endter, 1664.Google Scholar
Schottel, Justus Georg. Teutsche Sprachkunst. Braunschweig: Gruber, 1641.Google Scholar
Schramm, Gottlieb Georg (respondens), and Sennert, Michael (praeses). De cerebro. Wittenberg: Wendt, 1662.Google Scholar
Schroeck, Lucas. “Scholion.” Miscellanea curiosa Dec. 2, An. 4. (1683), 126–8.Google Scholar
Schröder, Johannes von. Geschichte und Beschreibung der Stadt. Schleswig: self-published, 1827.Google Scholar
Schwarze, Nicolaus Hermann. Nachrichten von der Stadt Kiel. Flensburg: Serringhausen, 1775.Google Scholar
Scilla, Agostino. La vana speculazione disingannata dal senso (1673), trans. Palmer, Rodney, Williams, Rosemary, and Bernocchi, Ilaria. Cambridge: Sedgwick Museum, 2016.Google Scholar
Seger, Georg. De curiositate physica. Gdansk: Rhetius, 1675.Google Scholar
Seger, Georg. Synopsis methodica rariorum. Copenhagen: Holst, 1653.Google Scholar
Sennert, Andreas. Exercitationum Theologicarum Trias: Quibus I. Theologia … II. Anthropologia & III Christologia … dictis S.S. Scripturae totius extantioribus illustranturque ut de Religionis Christiano-evangelicae articulorum praecipuorum. Wittenberg: Meyer, 1667.Google Scholar
Sennert, Johann Andreas (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De lacte lunae. Kiel: Reumann, 1667.Google Scholar
Seyboth, Johann Georg (respondens), and Kirchmaier, Sebastian (praeses). De corporibus petrificatis. Wittenberg: Henckel, 1664.Google Scholar
Societas Disquirentium. Historia Societatis Disquirentium. Jena: Werther, 1683.Google Scholar
Societas Pythagorea. Erhard Weigelii … Tectratyn. Jena: Werther, 1672.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Anthropologia physica. Wittenberg: Berger, 1647.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Defensio tractatus de origine formarum. Wittenberg: Fincel, 1638.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Institutiones Physicae. Lübeck: Jeger, 1646.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Oratio de physica lucente. Wittenberg: Rohner, 1634.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. Synopsis Anthropologiae physicae. Wittenberg: Berger, 1650.Google Scholar
Steno, Nicholas. De solido intra solidum. Florence: Stella, 1669.Google Scholar
Stieler, Kaspar von. Kurze Lehrschrift von der Hochteutschen Sprachkunst. Nuremberg: Hofmann, 1691.Google Scholar
Spon, Jacob. Miscellanea Eruditae Antiquitatis. Lyon: Huguetan, 1685.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas. The History of the Royal Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London: Martin and Allestry, 1667.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De affectibus gravidarum. Halle: Henckel, 1708.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De certitudine artis medicae. Halle: Henckel, 1698.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De febribus. Halle: Henckel, 1709.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De medicina medicinae curiosae. Halle: Henckel, 1714.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De medicinae et chirurgiae perpetuo nexu. Halle: Krebs, 1705.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De mutatione temperamenti. Halle: Henckel, 1712.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. Opusculum Chymico-physico-medicum. Halle: Orphanage, 1715.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De scriptis suis. Halle: Orphanage, 1707.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De testimoniis medicis. NA: NA, 1706.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. De vera diversitate corporis. Halle: Orphanage, 1707.Google Scholar
Stelluti, Francesco. “Tractatus de Ligno Fossili Minerali noviter detecto, trans. J.D. Major.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix, Dec. 1, An. 3 (1672), 606–16.Google Scholar
Struve, Burckhard Gotthelf. Introductio ad notitiam rei litterariae. Jena: Bailliar, 1706.Google Scholar
Sturm, Johann Christoph. Collegium curiosum, sive experimentale. Nuremberg: Endter, 1676, 1685.Google Scholar
Sturm, Leonhard Christoph. Die geöffnete Raritäten- und Naturalienkammer. Hamburg: Schiller, 1704.Google Scholar
Suhm, Peter Friedrich von. “Gedanken über die Schwierigkeiten.” In Historische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Kopenhagen. Vol. 1. Kiel: NA, 1782, 353–464.Google Scholar
Tatter, Georg Martin (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Disputationem anatomicam de sanguine peridromo. Kiel: Reumann, 1673.Google Scholar
Tentzel, Wilhelm. Monatliche Unterredungen. Leipzig: NA, 1689–98.Google Scholar
Tidicaeus, Franciscus. Humanitatis horizon, id est, conformata hominis cum mundo commendatio. Leipzig: Nerlich, 1638.Google Scholar
Tollius, Jacob. Epistolae itinerariae, ed. Hennin, Heinrich. Amsterdam: Halm, 1700.Google Scholar
Torquatus, Alexander Julius. Christianae-Albertinae inauguratio. NA: NA, 1666.Google Scholar
Tralles, Johann Christian (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). De malacia. Kiel: Reumann, 1677.Google Scholar
Tribbechow, Adam. De doctoribus scholasticis et corrupta per eos divinarum humanarumque rerum scientia. Giessen: Wellstein, 1665.Google Scholar
Tribbechow, Adam. Historia Naturalismi. Jena: Krebs, 1700Google Scholar
Trismegistus, Hermes Mercurius. His Divine Pymander. London: Brewster, 1657.Google Scholar
Upmarck, Johann (praeses), and Lund, Christian (respondens). Dissertatio philosophica de polypragmosynē. Uppsala: Werner, 1706.Google Scholar
Valentini, Christoph Bernhard. Disputatio inauguralis medica de ceraunia. Giessen: Vulpian, 1717.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Armamentarium naturae. Giessen: Müller, 1709.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Epistola de natura naturae, ad R. Boyle. Giessen: Müller, 1689.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. “Historiae literariae medicae S.R.I. Acad. Nat. Cur.” 8 parts. Miscellanea curiosa Appendix (1685–1700).Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Historiae literariae S.R.I. academiae naturae curiosorum. Giessen: Müller, 1708.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Historia physices experimentalis. Giessen: Müller, 1688.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Instructiones physicae moderno seculo accomodatae. Giessen: Müller, 1691.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Microcosmi tortura medica convulsio. Giessen: Karger, 1680.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Museum Museorum. Frankfurt: Zunner, 1704, 1714.Google Scholar
Valentini, Michael Bernhard. Praxis medicinae infallibilis. Frankfurt: Sande, 1711.Google Scholar
Viète, François. Opera mathematica. Leiden: Elzevier, 1646.Google Scholar
Vitruvius, Marcus. Architectura. Venice: Crugher, 1567.Google Scholar
Vockerodt, Gottfried. Commentatio de eruditorum societatibus. Gotha: Schall, 1704.Google Scholar
Volckmann, Georg Anton. Silesia subterannea. Leipzig: Weidmann, 1720.Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerard Jan. Ars Historica. Leiden: Maire, 1623.Google Scholar
Wagner, Georg Friedrich (respondens), and Major, Johann Daniel (praeses). Disquisitio de spiritibus. Kiel: Reumann, 1675.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Ad plantas laete Virentes, & Flores Versicolores, in Vicinis pratis, Sylvis & Campus perlustrandas. Kiel: Reumann, 1696.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Brevis adumbratio Collegii Anatomici privati. Kiel: Reumann, 1692.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Collegium physico-experimentale. Kiel: Reuther, 1711.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Disputationem inauguralem viri nobilissimi et clarissimi Georgii Krysingii, Practici Flensburgensis. Kiel: Reuther, 1728.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Excursiones botanicas. Kiel: NA, 1712.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Index Librorum … Wil. Hulderici Waldtschmiedt … collectorum. Kiel: 1731.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Kurtze und Gründliche Beschreibung Derer Aloen. Kiel: Riechel, 1705.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. “Memoria Majoriana.” Miscellanea curiosa Appendix, Dec. 3, An. 5–6 (1697–8), 185–206.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Memoria Majoriana. Frankfurt: Froberg, 1705.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, Wilhelm Ulrich. Programma de vegetabilium usu eximio in medicina. Kiel: Reuther, 1708.Google Scholar
Wedel, Georg Wolfgang. Non-Entia Chimica. Frankfurt: Götz, 1670.Google Scholar
Wedel, Georg Wolfgang. Propemticum inaugurale de medicamine faciei. Jena: Krebs, 1695.Google Scholar
Weickman, Christoph. Exoticophylacium Weickmannianum. NA: NA, 1659.Google Scholar
Weigel, Erhard. Die Fried-und Nutzbringende Kunst-Weißheit. Jena: Bauhofer, 1673.Google Scholar
Welsch, Georg Hieronymus. Hecatosteae II. Augsburg: Goebel, 1675.Google Scholar
Welsch, Georg Hieronymus. De vena medinensi. Augsburg: Goebel, 1674.Google Scholar
Wernicke, Christian. Poetischer Versuch. Hamburg: Hertel, 1704.Google Scholar
Wiegand, Georg Ernst (respondens), and Sperling, Johann (praeses). Lithologia. Wittenberg: Wendt, 1657.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. Cerebri anatome. London: Roycroft, 1664.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. Diatribae duæ medico-philosophicæ quarum prior agit de fermentatione, sive, de motu intestino particularum in quovis corpore: altera de febribus, sive, de motu earundem in sanguine animalium. London: Roycroft, 1659.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. A Medical-Philosophical Discourse of Fermentation. London: Dring, 1681.Google Scholar
Wittich, Johannes. Von dem Ligno Guyaco … und von dem Grießholtz, so man Lignum Nephriticum nennet. Leipzig: NA, 1589.Google Scholar
Worm, Ole. Museum Wormianum. Leiden: Elzevier, 1655.Google Scholar
Wowern, Johann von. De polymathia tractatio. Hamburg: Froben, 1603.Google Scholar
Wowern, Johann von. De polymathia tractatio. Leipzig: Cörner, 1665.Google Scholar
Wurffbain, Friedrich Sigimund (respondens), and Moller, Daniel Wilhelm (praeses). Dissertatio de technophysiotameis. Altdorf: NA, 1704.Google Scholar
Abou Nemeh, Catherine. “Daring to Conjecture in Seventeeth- and Eighteenth-Century Sciences,” Isis 113:4 (2022), 728–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acuña, A. U., and Amat-Guerri, F.. “Early History of Solution Flourescence: The Lignum nephriticum of Nicolás Monardes.” In Berberan-Santos, M. N. (ed.), Fluorescence of Supermolecules, Polymers, and Nanosystems. Berlin: Springer, 2008, 3–20.Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas. “The Philosophy Curriculum at Scottish Universities.” In Garrett, Aaron and Harris, James A. (eds.), Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Vol. II: Method, Metaphysics, Mind, Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 1–52.Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas, D’Aprile, Iwan Michelangelo, Décultot, Elisabeth, Grote, Simon, and Lifschitz, Avi. “The German Enlightenment.” German History 35:4 (2017), 588–602.Google Scholar
Allen, Bryce, Qin, Jian, and Lancaster, F. W.. “Persuasive Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of References in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665–1990.” Social Studies of Science 24:2 (1994), 279–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Angelis, Simone. Anthropologien: Genese und Konfiguration einer “Wissenschaft vom Menschen” in der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Anrep, Gabriel. “Pincier.” In Svenska Adelns Ättar-Taflor. Vol. 3: Nackreij – Skytte. Stockholm: Norstedt, 1862, 181.Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter, and Vanzo, Alberto, Experimental Philosophy and the Origins of Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, Jerónimo. “From the Space of the Wunderkammer to Macondo’s Wonder Rooms: The Collection of Marvels in Cien años de soledad.” In Andrade, María Mercedes (ed.), Collecting from the Margins: Material Culture in a Latin American Context. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2016, 183–202.Google Scholar
Asmussen-Stratmann, Karen. “Barocke Gartenkunst auf Gottorf.” In Hering, Rainer (ed.), Die Ordnung der Natur: Vorträge zu historischen Gärten und Parks in Schleswig-Holstein. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2009, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1999.Google Scholar
Auge, Oliver. “Diener der Fürsten? Die Lübecker Domherren zwischen 1585 und 1803.” In Auge, Oliver and Scharrenberg, Anke, Die Diener der Fürstbischöfe: Der Eutiner Hof im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Kiel: Wachholtz, 2023, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babin, Malte-Ludolf. “Leibniz und das Dravänpolabische.” Niedersächsisches Jahrbuch für Landesgeschichte 72 (2000), 191–205.Google Scholar
Baldassari, Fabrizio. “A Clockwork Orange: Citrus Fruits in Early Modern Philosophy, Science, and Medicine, 1564–1668.” Nuncius 37:2 (2022), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Peter, and Clark, William, eds. Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeley, Philip. “Leibniz and the Royal Society Revisited.” In Weckend, Julia and Strickland, Lloyd (eds.), Leibniz’s Legacy and Impact. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2020, 23–52.Google Scholar
Beeley, Philip, and Scriba, Christoph J.. “Auf der Suche nach neuen Wegen. Die Selbstdarstellung der Leopoldina und der Royal Society in London in ihr Korrespondenz 1670–1677.” In Toellner, Richard (ed.), Die Gründung der Leopoldina – Academia Naturae Curiosorum – im historischen Kontext. Johann Laurentius Bausch zum 400. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, 2008, 305–26.Google Scholar
Beetz, Manfred. Rhetorische Logik: Präemissen der deutschen Lyrik im Übergang vom 17. zum 18. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencard, Mogens. “Eine private fürstliche Kunstkammer: Rosenborg 1718/Gottorf 1694.” In Grote, A. (ed.), Macrocosmos in Microcosmo: Die Welt in der Stube zur Geschichte des Sammelns 1450 bis 1800. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1994, 339–48.Google Scholar
Bencard, Mogens, Hein, Jorgen, Gundestrup, Bente, and Drees, Jan, Die Gottorfer Kunstkammer. Schleswig: Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum, 1997.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim, and Talas, Sofia, eds. Cabinets of Experimental Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Wieland, and Drescher, Georg. “Das Symbol der Akademie.” In Müller, Uwe (ed.), Salve Academicum II. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina. Schweinfurt: Leopoldina, 1991, 77–108.Google Scholar
Bernays, Michael. Zur Lehre von den Citaten und Noten. In Zur neueren und neuesten Litteraturgeschichte II. Berlin: Behr, 1899, 253–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertucci, Paola. Artisanal Enlightenment: Science and the Mechanical Arts in Old Regime France. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Luca, Gilson, Simon, and Kraye, Jill, eds. Vernacular Aristotelianism in Italy from the Fourteenth to the Seventeenth Century. London: University of London Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Black, Scott. “Boyle’s Essay: Genre and the Making of Early Modern Knowledge.” In Making Knowledge in Early Modern Europe: Practices, Objects, and Texts, 1400–1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008, 178–98.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Constance. “Sturm, Morhof and Brucker vs. Aristotle: Three Eclectic Natural Philosophers view the Aristotelian Method.” In di Liscia, Daniel A., Kessler, Eckhard, and Methuen, Charlotte (eds.), Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997, 381–407.Google Scholar
Blaicher, Günther. Das Deutschlandbild in der Englischen Literatur. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1992.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann. “Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance.” Isis 91:1 (2000), 32–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Ann. “Scholarly Critique in Early Modern Europe.” H-France Salon, 7:20 (2015), #2.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann. The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bödeker, Hans Erich, Büttgen, Philippe, and Espagne, Michel, eds. Die Wissenschaft vom Menschen in Göttingen um 1800: Wissenschaftliche Praktiken, Institutionelle Geographie, Europäische Netzwerke. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008.Google Scholar
Bondio, Mariacarla Gadebush. “Avoidable Mistakes- Premodern Medical Fallibility as an Ethical Problem with Epistemological Implications.” In Ciavolella, Massimo, Canalis, Rinaldo F., and Finucci, Valeria (eds.), Rethinking Medical Humanities: Perspectives from the Arts and the Social Sciences. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. Mother Tongues and Nations: The Invention of the Native Speaker. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst. The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of Nature, Art and Technology. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Brown, Harcourt. Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Brzezowski, Wojciech. “Der Breslauische Wassergarten von Wolfgang Scharschmidt.” Zandera 24:1 (2009), 1–10.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. “The Zymotechnic Roots of Biotechnology.” The British Journal for the History of Science 25:1 (1992), 127–44.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. The Polymath: A Cultural History from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Bush, Vannevar. Science, The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1945.Google Scholar
Carhart, Michael. Leibniz Discovers Asia: Social Networking in the Republic of Letters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Carstens, Carsten Erich “Kielmanseck, Johann Adolph Kielmann von.” In Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. Vol. 15. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1882, 719–20.Google Scholar
Carstens, Carsten Erich “Wowern, Johann von.” In Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. Vol. 44. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1898, 220.Google Scholar
Chang, Kevin. “From Oral Disputation to Written Text: The Transformation of the Dissertation in Early Modern Europe.” History of Universities 19:2 (2004), 129–87.Google Scholar
Clark, William. Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio. “Thomas Willis’ Iatrochemistry and the Activity of Matter.” Notes and Records 77:4 (2023), 717–32.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. “The Eighteenth-Century Origins of the Concept of Scientific Revolution.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37:2 (1976), 257–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Alix. Inventing the Indigenous: Local Knowledge and Natural History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cottegnies, Line, Thompson, John, and Parageau, Sandrine, eds. Women and Curiosity in Early Modern England and France. Leiden: Brill, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Henry. The Scientific Method: An Evolution of Thinking from Darwin to Dewey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Daniel, Glyn, and Renfrew, Colin. The Idea of Prehistory. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “Preface: Things that Talk.” In Daston, Lorraine (ed.), Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. New York: Zone, 2004, 7–24.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “The Sciences of the Archive.” Osiris 27:1 (2012), 156–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Most, Glenn W.. “History of Science and History of Philologies.” Isis 106:2 (2015), 378–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone, 1998.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. “The Meaning of Experience.” In Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 106–31.Google Scholar
Dietz, Bettina. “Aufklärung als Praxis: Naturgeschichte im 18. Jahrhundert.” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 36:2 (2009), 235–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Bettina. “Mobile Objects: The Space of Shells in Eighteenth-Century France.” The British Journal for the History of Science 39:3 (2006), 363–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilg, Peter. “Apotheker als Sammler.” In Grote, A. (ed.), Macrocosmos in microcosmo: Die Welt in der Stube zur Geschichte des Sammelns 1450 bis 1800. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1994, 453–74.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. “Die Leipziger gelehrten Sozietäten in der 1. Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts und das Auftreten Johann Christoph Gottscheds.” In Donnert, Erich (ed.), Europa in der Frühen Neuzeit: Festschrift fur Günter Mühlpfordt. Vol. 5: Aufklärung in Europa. Cologne: Böhlau, 1999, 17–42.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. “Die Mitteldeutschen Gelehrten Kollegien Des 17. Und Frühen 18. Jahrhunderts Als Vorläufer Und Vorbilder der Wissenschaftlichen Akademien.” In Bahlcke, Joachim and Garloff, Mona (eds.), Studien Zur Wissenschafts- Und Bildungsgeschichte in Deutschland Um 1700: Gelehrte Sozietäten – Universitäten – Höfe Und Schulen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Detlef. “Die Rolle der Universität bei der Herausbildung der modernen Wissenschaft im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert.: Das Beispiel Helmstedt.” In Bahlcke, Joachim and Garloff, Mona (eds.), Studien Zur Wissenschafts- Und Bildungsgeschichte in Deutschland Um 1700: Gelehrte Sozietäten – Universitäten – Höfe Und Schulen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015, 192–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Detlef. “Universitäten und Gelehrte Sozietäten Im 17. Jahrhundert.” In Bahlcke, Joachim and Garloff, Mona (eds.), Studien Zur Wissenschafts- Und Bildungsgeschichte in Deutschland Um 1700: Gelehrte Sozietäten – Universitäten – Höfe Und Schulen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Detlef. “Universitätsprofessoren um 1700 an den protestantischen Universitäten im Reich und ihr Anteil an der Entwicklung der modernen Wissenschaften.” In Bahlcke, Joachim and Garloff, Mona (eds.), Studien Zur Wissenschafts- Und Bildungsgeschichte in Deutschland Um 1700: Gelehrte Sozietäten – Universitäten – Höfe Und Schulen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogan, Mattei, and Pahre, Robert. Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1990.Google Scholar
Donecker, Stefan. “Re-inventing the ‘Germanic’ in the Early Modern Era: Omnes Germani sunt, contra fabulas quorundam.” In Friedrich, Matthias and Harland, James M. (eds.), Interrogating the “Germanic”: A Category and Its Use in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drees, Jan. “Die ‘Gottorfische Kunst-Kammer’: Anmerkungung zur ihrer geschichte nach historischen textzeugnissen.” In Spielmann, Heinz and Drees, Jan (eds.), Gottorf im Glanz des Barock: Kunst und Kultur am schleswiger Hof, 1544–1713. Vol. 1. Schleswig: Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum, 1997.Google Scholar
Drees, Jan. “‘Virtutis gloria merces’: Herzog Friedrich III. von Schleswig-Holstein-Gottorf (1597–1659) und sein Streben nach Ruhm und Anerkennung durch die Förderung der Wissenschaften und der Künste.” In Rot, Dietrich (ed.), Die Blumenbücher des Hans Simon Holtzbecker und Hamburgs Lustgärten. Keltern-Weiler: Goecke & Evers, 2003, 89–114.Google Scholar
Duchet, Michèle. Anthropologie et histoire au siècle des Lumières Paris: Michel, 1995.Google Scholar
Dym, Warren. “Scholars and Miners: Dowsing and the Freiberg Mining Academy.” Technology and Culture 49:4 (2008), 833–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckart, Wolfgang. “Melanchthon und die Medizin.” In Frank, Günther and Rhein, Stefan (eds.), Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften seiner Zeit. Sigmaringen: Thorbeke, 1998, 183–202.Google Scholar
Eckart, Wolfgang. “Zur Titelgestaltung Medizinischer Fachbucheditionen Des 17. Jahrhunderts.” Medizinhistorisches Journal 14:4 (1979), 292–311.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, Michael. “Body, Soul and Anatomy in Late Aristotelian Psychology.” In Manning, Gideon (ed.), Matter and Form in Early Modern Science and Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 33–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Enenkel, Karl A. E., and Ottenheym, Konrad A.. Ambitious Antiquities, Famous Forebears: Constructions of a Glorious Past in the Early Modern Netherlands and in Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enke, Ulrike. “Gelehrtenleben im späten 17. Jahrhundert: eine Annäherung an den Gießener Medizinprofessor Michael Bernhard Valentini (1657–1729).” Medizinhistorisches Journal 42:3–4 (2007), 299–329.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Gunnar. The Atlantic Vision: Olaus Rudbeck and Baroque Science. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1994.Google Scholar
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. “The Color of Reason: The Idea of ‘Race’ in Kant’s Anthropology.” In Faull, Katherine M. (ed.), Anthropology and the German Enlightenment: Perspectives on Humanity. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1995, 200–41.Google Scholar
Facca, Danilo. Early Modern Aristotelianism and the Making of Philosophical Disciplines: Metaphysics, Ethics, and Politics. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, Mordechai. “‘Experimental Philosophy’: Invention and Rebirth of a Seventeenth-Century Concept.” Early Science and Medicine 21 (2016), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feingold, Mordechai. The Mathematicians’ Apprenticeship: Science, Universities and Society in England, 1560–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.Google Scholar
Fridenthal, Meelis, Marti, Hanspeter, and Seidel, Robert. “Introduction.” In Friedenthal, M., Marti, H., and Seidel, R. (eds.), Early Modern Disputations and Dissertations in an Interdisciplinary and European Context. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frietsch, Ute. “Making University Fields for Chymistry: A Case Study of Helmstedt University.” Ambix 68:2-3 (2021), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frühsorge, Gotthardt. Der politische Körper: Zum Begriff des Politischen im. 17. Jahrhundert und in den Romanen Christian Weises. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulda, Daniel. “Communication and Reputation: Correspondences between the Scientific Cultures in the Eighteenth and Twenty-First Centuries.” In Holenstein, André, Steinke, Hubert, and Stuber, Martin (eds.), Scholars in Action: The Practice of Knowledge and the Figure of the Savant in the 18th Century. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill, 2013, 391–412.Google Scholar
Fulda, Daniel. “Von der Polyhistorie zur modernen Wissenschaft. Zum politisch-galanten Gelehrtenideal der Frühaufklärung.” In Schneider, U. J. (ed.) Kulturen des Wissens im 18. Jahrhundert. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008, 281–8.Google Scholar
Fulda, Daniel, and Pečar, Andreas, eds. Innovationsuniversität Halle?: Neuheit und Innovation als historische und als historiographische Kategorien. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Ofer, and Chen-Morris, Raz. Baroque Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gal, Ofer, and Chen-Morris, Raz, eds. Science in the Age of Baroque. New York: Springer, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. The Natural and the Human: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1739–1841. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gøbel, Erik. “The Danish West Indies, 1660s–1750s: Formative Years.” In Roper, L. H. (ed.), The Torrid Zone: Caribbean Colonization and Cultural Interaction in the Long Seventeenth Century. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2018, 118–31.Google Scholar
Görmar, Maximilian. “Die Vor- und Frühgeschichte der Acta Eruditorum im Kontext der Leipziger Sozietätslandschaft des 17. Jahrhunderts.” In Löffler, Katrin (ed.), Wissen in Bewegung: Gelehrte Journale, Debatten und der Buchhandel der Aufklärung. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2020, 31–44.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, David. Black and Slave: The Origins and History of the Curse of Ham. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinski, Jan. “Robert Boyle: Scepticism and Authority in Seventeenth-Century Chemical Discourse.” In Benjamin, Andrew E., Cantor, Geoffrey N., and Christie, John R. R. (eds.), The Figural and the Literal: Problems of Language in the History of Science and Philosophy, 1630–1800. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987, 58–82.Google Scholar
Goodrum, Matthew. “Questioning Thunderstones and Arrowheads: The Problem of Recognizing and Interpreting Stone Artifacts in the Seventeenth Century.” Early Science and Medicine, 13(5) (2008), 482–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouk, Penelope. “Acoustics in the Early Royal Society 1660–1680.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 36:2 (1982),155–75.Google Scholar
Gramsch, Alexander. “Ein Abriss der Geschicte der Prähistorischen Archäologie in Deutschland: Genese, Entwicklung und Institutionalisierung.” Das Altertum 52 (2007), 275–304.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. The Footnote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. “The World of the Polyhistors: Humanism and Encyclopedism.” Central European History 18:1 (1985), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Jardine, Lisa. From Humanism to the Humanities: Education and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Siraisi, Nancy. Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines in Renaissance Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gratzer, Walter. “Biophysics – Whence, Whither, Wherefore – or Hold That Hyphen.” BMC Biology 9 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-9-12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimm, Gunter. Literatur und Gelehrtentum in Deutschland: Untersuchungen zum Wandel ihres Verhältnisses vom Humanismus bis zur Frühaufklärung. Tübingen: Niemeyer-Verlag, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Gunter. “Vom Schulfuchs zum Menscheitslehrer: Zum Wandel des Gelehrtentums zwischen Barock und Aufklärung.” In Bödeker, Hans Erich and Herrmann, Ulrich (eds.), Über den Prozess der Aufklärung in Deutschland im 18. Jahrhundert: Personen, Institutionen und Medien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987, 14–38.Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E., and Reidy, Michael. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummel, Hans. Forschungsgeschichte in Deutschland. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundlach, Franz, ed. Das Album der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 1665–1865. Kiel: Lipsius & Tischer, 1915.Google Scholar
Häberlein, Mark. “‘Mohren,’ Ständische Gesellschaft und Atlantische Welt.” In Schnurmann, Claudia and Lehmann, Hartmut (eds.), Atlantic Understanding: Essays on European and American History in Honor of Hermann Wellenreuther. Münster: LIT, 2006, 77–102.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jörg. Vom Kuriositätenkabinett zum wissenschaftlichen Museum: die Entwicklung der zoologischen Sammlungen der Kieler Universität von 1665 bis 1868. Kiel: Goecke and Evers, 1984.Google Scholar
Hakelberg, Dietrich. “For the Sake of Memory: Practicing Archaeology in Early Modern Silesia.” In Jensen, Ola Wolfhechel (ed.), Histories of Archaeological Practices: Reflections on Methods, Strategies and Social Organisation in Past Fieldwork. Stockholm: National Historical Museum, 2012, 53–80.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker. “Die Universitätsgründungen im Zeitalter der Aufklärung.” In Baumgart, P. and Hammerstein, N. (eds.), Beiträge zu Problemen deutscher Universitätsgründungen der frühen Neuzeit. Nendeln: KTO, 1978, 263–98.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker. “Zur Geschichte der deutschen Universitäten im Zeitalter der Aufklärung.” In Rössler, Hellmut and Franz, Günther (eds.), Universität und Gelehrtenstand 1400–1800. Limburg: Sarke, 1970, 145–82.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker, ed. Universitäten und Aufklärung. Göttingen: Wallstein 1995.Google Scholar
Handelmann, Heinrich. “Rückblick auf die Bestrebungen für prähistorische Archäologie in Schleswig-Holstein.” Schriften des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schleswig-Holstein 2 (1876), 1–14.Google Scholar
Hampe, Theodor. Fahrende Leute in der deutschen Vergangenheit. Leipzig: Diederich, 1902.Google Scholar
Hare, J. Laurence. Excavating Nations: Archaeology, Museums, and the German-Danish Borderlands. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Peter. “Curiosity, Forbidden Knowledge, and the Reformation of Natural Philosophy in Early Modern England.” Isis 92:2 (2001), 265–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, Peter. “What’s in a Name? ‘Physico-Theology’ in Seventeenth-Century England.” In Blair, Ann and von Greyerz, Kaspar (eds.), Physico-theology: Religion and Science in Europe, 1650–1750. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020, 39–51.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L. Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, Jørgen. “Learning versus Status? Kunstkammer or Schatzkammer?” Journal of the History of Collections, 14:2 (2002), 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Hennepe, Mieneke. “Of the Fisherman’s Net and Skin Pores. Reframing Conceptions of the Skin in Medicine 1572–1714.” In Horstmanshoff, Manfred, King, Helen, and Zittel, Claus (eds.), Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 523–48.Google Scholar
Hodgen, Margaret T. Early Anthropology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holländer, Eugen. “Medizin-historische Bemerkungen zum menschlichen Aquarium.” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 39 (1913), 803–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotson, Howard. Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications, 1543–1630. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotson, Howard. “The Philosophical Fulcrum of Seventeenth-Century Leiden: Pedagogical Innovation and Philosophical Novelty in Adriaan Heerebord.” In Cellamare, Davide and Mantovani, Mattia (eds.), Descartes in the Classroom: Teaching Cartesian Philosophy in the Early Modern Age. Leiden: Brill, 2023, 34–59.Google Scholar
Hotson, Howard. The Reformation of Common Learning: Post-Ramist Method and the Reception of the New Philosophy, 1618–1670. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, Thijs. The Finger of God: Anatomical Practice in 17th Century Leiden. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Leiden University (2009).Google Scholar
Hüllen, Werner. “Reality, the Museum, and the Catalogue: A Semiotic Interpretation of Early German Texts of Museology.” Semiotica 80:3–4(1990), 265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hünniger, Dominik. “What Is a Useful University? Knowledge Economies and Higher Education in Late Eighteenth-Century Denmark and Central Europe.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 72:2 (2018), 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Pascale. Moeurs Érudites: étude sur la micrologie littéraire, Allemagne, XVIe–XVIIIe siècles. Geneva: Droz, 2002.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. “The Cabinet Institutionalised: The Royal Society’s ‘Repository’ and Its Background.” In Impey, Oliver and MacGregor, Arthur (eds.), The Origins of Museums. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985, 159–68.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society. Woodbridge: Boydell, 1989.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. Science and the Shape of Orthodoxy: Intellectual Change in Late Seventeenth-Century Britain. Woodbridge: Boydell, 1995.Google Scholar
Im Hof, Ulrich. Das gesellige Jarhundert: Gesellschaft und Gesellschaften im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. Munich: Beck, 1982.Google Scholar
Impey, Oliver, and MacGregor, Arthur, eds. The Origins of Museums: The Cabinet of Curiosities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Suzanna. Cosmos and Materiality in Early Modern Prague. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Karl. “Cassius, Christian.” In Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. Vol. 4. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1876, 62.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. Erasmus, Man of Letters: The Construction of Charisma in Print. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jarwar, Mazhar Ali, Dumontet, Stefano, Pasquale, Vincenzo, and Chen, Chuan. “Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation: Environments, Applications, and Mechanisms.” Geomicrobiology Journal 39:10 (2022), 833–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Mikkel Munthe. “Teaching Natural Law at the University of Kiel: The History of an Academic Discipline, 1665–1773.” History of Universities 35:2 (2022), 106–42.Google Scholar
Johannesson, Kurt. The Renaissance of the Goths in Sixteenth-Century Sweden: Johannes and Olaus Magnus as Politicians and Historians, trans. and ed. Larson, James. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalliaros, Katharina Pilaski. The Munich Kunstkammer: Art, Nature, and the Representation of Knowledge in Courtly Contexts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Kangro, Hans. Joachim Jungius’ Experimenten und Gedanken zur Begründung der Chemie als Wissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1968.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Benjamin. “The Legal Rights of Religious Refugees in the ‘Refugee-Cities’ of Early Modern Germany.” Journal of Refugee Studies 32:1 (2019), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Thomas Da Costa. Arcimboldo: Visual Jokes, Natural History, and Still-Life Painting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Elizabeth. “Shifting Horizons: The Medieval Compilation of Knowledge as Mirror of a Changing World.” In König, Jason and Woolf, Greg (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellenbenz, Hermann. “Ahlefeldt, Joachim von.” Neue Deutsche Biographie. Vol. 1. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1953, 109–10.Google Scholar
Keller, Vera. “Happiness and Projects between London and Vienna: Wilhelm von Schröder on the London Weavers’ Riot of 1675, Workhouses, and Technological Unemployment.” History of Political Economy 53:3 (2021), 407–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Vera. The Interlopers: Early Stuart Projects and the Undisciplining of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Vera. Knowledge and the Public Interest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Keller, Vera. “Mining Tacitus: Secrets of Empire, Nature, and Art in the Reason of State.” British Journal for the History of Science 45:2 (2012), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, Vera. “Professionalizing Doubt: Johann Daniel Major’s Observation ‘On the Horn of the Bezoardic Goat,’ Curiosity Collecting, and Periodical Publication.” In Giannini, Giulia and Feingold, Mordechai (eds.), Institutionalization of Science in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 199–235.Google Scholar
Keller, Vera. “Vernacular Knowledge, Learned Medicine, and Social Technologies in the Academia Naturae Curiosorum, 1670–1700, or, How to Publish on Sirens, Dragons, and Basilisks.” In Roos, Anna Marie and Keller, Vera (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy. Brepols: Turnhout, 2023, 127–54.Google Scholar
Keller, Vera, and Penman, Leigh. “From the Archives of Scientific Diplomacy: Science and the Shared Interests of Samuel Hartlib’s London and Frederick Clodius’ Gottorf.” Isis 106:1 (2015), 17–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, Donald. “The Problem of Knowledge and the Concept of Discipline.” In Kelley, Donald R. (ed.), History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 1997, 14–28.Google Scholar
Kempe, Michael. “Die Anwesenheit der Abwesenheit: Katakomben, Mumien, Urnen – die Erforschung des Unterirdischen als Archiv der Geschichte.” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 41:3 (2014), 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, Stephan. “The Baumann’s Cave at Rübeland/Harz, Germany, One of the Caves Notes in Early Science History for Its Cave Bear and Cave Hyena Bone Deposits.” In Scientific Annals. Vol. 98. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University, 2006, 213–20.Google Scholar
Kenny, Neil. “The Metaphorical Collection of Curiosities in Early Modern France and Germany.” In Evans, R. J. W. and Marr, Alexander (eds.), Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006, 43–62.Google Scholar
Kenny, Neil. The Uses of Curiosity in Early Modern France and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermode, Frank. “Crisis Critic: Review of The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language by Michel Foucault, translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith.” The New York Review of Books (May 17, 1973), 36–9.Google Scholar
Kevorkian, Tanya. Baroque Piety: Religion, Society, and Music in Leipzig, 1650–1750. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Kielmansegg, Eduard Georg Ludwig William Howe von, and von Kielmansegg, Erich Friedrich Christian Ludwig. Familien-Chronik der Herren, Freiherren und Grafen von Kielmansegg. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1872.Google Scholar
Kivistö, Sari. The Vices of Learning: Morality and Knowledge at Early Modern Universities. Leiden: Brill, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson. “Blurring, Cracking, and Crossing: Permeation and the Fracturing of Discipline.” In Messer-Davidow, Ellen, Shumway, David R., and Sylvan, David J. (eds.), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993, 185–211.Google Scholar
Koch, Hans-Reinhard, and Koch, Konrad R.. “Borri, the Prophet, on the ‘Restitutio Humorum’ and on Lens Aspiration in the 17th Century.” Sudhoffs Archiv 101:2 (2017), 160–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Julia K., and Mertens, Eva-Maria, eds. Eine Dame zwischen 500 Herren. Johanna Mestorf – Werk und Wirkung. Münster: Waxmann, 2002.Google Scholar
König-Pralong, Catherine. “Omnes Homines Natura Scire Desiderant. Anthropologie, Philosophie et Distinction Sociale.” Quaestio 15 (2015), 121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köstlbauer, Josef. “Slavery in the Holy Roman Empire.” In Pargas, Damian A. and Schiel, Juliane (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery throughout History. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, 259–77.Google Scholar
Koslofsky, Craig. “Superficial Blackness?: Johann Nicolas Pechlin’s De Habitu et Colore Aethiopum qui vulgo Nigritae (1677).” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 18:1 (2018), 140–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, Georg. Prähistorische Archäologie in Deutschland im Wandel der geistigen und politischen Situation. Munich: Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999.Google Scholar
Krämer, Fabian. “The Curiosi as Collectores: The Publications of the Academia Naturae Curiosorum, c. 1652–1706.” In Roos, Anna Marie and Keller, Vera (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy. Turnhout: Brepols, 2022, 107–25.Google Scholar
Krämer, Fabian. Ein Zentaur in London: Lektüre und Beobachtung in der frühneuzeitlichen Naturforschung. Affalterbach: Didymos, 2014.Google Scholar
Krafft, Fritz. “The Magic Word Chymiatria – and the Attractiviness of Medical Education at Marburg, 1608–1620: A Somewhat Different Reflection on Attendance.” History of Universities 26:1 (2012), 1–116.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus. Paper Machines: About Cards and Catalogs, 1548–1929. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, Hans-Joachim. “Johann Kunckel – der bedeutendste Plöner?” Jahrbuch für Heimatkunde in Kreis Plön 42 (2012), 89–150.Google Scholar
Kuechen, Ulla-Britta. “Botanische illustrierte Flugblätter der Frühen Neuzeit: Ein frühes Medium als Basis für die Einordnung von Phänomenen der Teratologie in den Wissensdiskurs und dessen Voraussetzungen.” In Harms, Wolfgang and Messerli, Alfred (eds.), Wahrnehmungsgeschichte und Wissensdiskurs im Illustrierten Flugblatt der Frühen Neuzeit (1450–1700). Basel: Schwabe, 2002, 265–303.Google Scholar
Kühlmann, Wilhelm. “Frühaufklärung und Barock: Traditionsbruch – Rückgriff – Kontinuität.” In Garber, Klaus (ed.), Europäische Barock-Rezeption. Part I. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1991, 187–214.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laerke, Mogens. “Leibniz, the Encyclopaedia, and the Natural Order of Thinking.” Journal of the History of Ideas 75:2 (2014), 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Visualisation and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands.” Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6 (1986), 1–40.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
Leigh, Matthew. From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, Elaine. “Read. Do. Observe. Take Note!” Centaurus 60 (2018), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Evonne. Baroque and the Political Language of Formalism (1845–1945): Burckhardt, Wölfflin, Gurlitt, Brinckmann, Sedlmayr. Basel: Schwabe, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Evonne. “The Political Project of Wölfflin’s Early Formalism.” October 139 (2012), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liciu, Alexandru. “Robert Hooke’s Science of ‘Petrifaction,’ the Trattato del Legno Fossile, and the Republic of Letters.” Erudition and the Republic of Letters 8:3 (2023), 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligota, Christopher, and Quantin, Jean-Louis. “Introduction.” In History of Scholarship: A Selection of Papers from the Seminar on the History of Scholarship Held Annually at the Warburg Institute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, Mareta. Untersuchungen zum Anthropologiebegriff des achtzehnten Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Lang, 1976.Google Scholar
Lindner, Bettina. “Quotations from 17th and 18th Century Medical Case Reports.” In Arendholz, Jenny, Bublitz, Wolfram, Kirner-Ludwig, Monika (eds.), The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015, 401–18.Google Scholar
Löffler, Katrin. “Wissen braucht einen Träger: Gelehrte Blätter als zentrales Medium der Aufklärung.” In Löffler, Katrin (ed.), Wissen in Bewegung: Gelehrte Journale, Debatten und der Buchhandel der Aufklärung. Stuttgart: Fritz Steiner, 2020, 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmeier, Dieter. “Das gotische Evangelium und die cimbrischen Heiden: Daniel Georg Morhof, Johann Daniel Major und der Gotizismus.” Lychnos (1977–8), 54–70.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Stefan. “Die Darstellung der mittelalterlichen Philosophie in Bayles ‘Dictionnaire historique et critique’: Beobachtungen zu Voraussetzungen, Quellen und Besonderheiten.” Aufklärung, 16 (2004), 95–110.Google Scholar
Lühning, Felix, Der Gottorfer Globus und das Globushaus im ‘Newen Werck.’ Schleswig: Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum, 1997.Google Scholar
Lux, David. “Societies, Circles, Academies, and Organizations: A Historiographic Essay on Seventeenth-Century Science.” In Barker, Peter and Ariew, Roger (eds.), Revolution and Continuity: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1991, 23–44.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. “The Beginnings of the German Academia Naturae Curiosorum (1652–1687) and the Character of German Intellectual Life.” In Goeing, Anja-Silvia, Parry, Glynn, and Feingold, Mordechai (eds.), Early Modern Universities: Networks of Higher Learning. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, Ian. “The ‘Sceptical Crisis’ Reconsidered: Galen, Rational Medicine and the Libertas Philosophandi.” Early Science and Medicine 11:3 (2006), 247–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malcolm, Noel. “Jean Bodin and the Authorship of the ‘Colloquium Heptaplomeres.’” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 69 (2006), 95–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maner, Brent. Germany’s Ancient Pasts: Archaeology and Historical Interpretation since 1700. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariss, A. “Kunst- und Naturalienkammern in Professorenhaushalten: Polyvalente Wissensräume an der Schnittstelle zwischen Gelehrsamkeit und Geselligkeit.” In Dolezel, E., Godel, R., Pečar, A. and Zaunstöck, H. (eds.), Ordnen-Vernetzen-Vermitteln: Kunst- und Naturalienkammern der Frühen Neuzeit als Lehr- und Lernorte. Stuttgart: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, 2018, 205–32.Google Scholar
Marten, M., and Piepenbring-Thomas, C.. Fogels Ordnungen: Aus der Werkstatt des Hamburger Mediziners Martin Fogel (1634–1675). Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Craig. Renaissance Meteorology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lucinda. “More than Piety: The Historiographic Neglect of Early Modern Lay Theology.” Church History and Religious Culture 98:1 (2018), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martus, Steffen. Aufklärung: Das Deutsche 18. Jahrhundert – ein Epochenbild. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2018.Google Scholar
Mattes, J. “Mapping the Invisible: Knowledge, Credibility and Visions of Earth in Early Modern Cave Maps.” The British Journal for the History of Science 55:1 (2022), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthes, Elke. Die Codices historiae litterariae Der Staats- und Universitätsbibliotk Hamburg. Hamburg: Hauswedell, 2009.Google Scholar
Mazzolini, Renato G. “Colonialism and the Emergence of Racial Theories.” In Hopwood, Nick, Flemming, Rebecca and Kassell, Lauren. (eds.), Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 361–74.Google Scholar
Mazzolini, Renato G. “Kiel 1675: La dissezione pubblica di una donna africana.” In Beretta, Marco, Mondella, Felice and Monti, Maria Teresa (eds.), Per una storia critica della scienza. Bologna: Cisalpino, 1996, 371–93.Google Scholar
McDonald, Lynn. “Women and the Emergence of Empiricism.” In Women Founders of the Social Sciences. Carleton: Carleton University Press, 1994, 23–85.Google Scholar
McMahon, Darrin M. “The Fate of Nations Is the Work of Genius: The French Revolution and the Great Man Theory of History.” In Bell, David A., and Mintzker, Yair (eds.), Rethinking the Age of Revolutions: France and the Birth of the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, 134–53.Google Scholar
Meadow, Mark. “Quanta prudentia et usus administrandrae reipublicae: Quiccheberg and Mylaeus on the Utility of techne.” Journal of the History of Collections 33:3 (2021), 409–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Christel. “Enzyklopädischer Ordo und sozialer Gebrauchsraum. Modelle der Funktionalität einer universalem Literaturform.” In Meier, Christel (ed.), Die Enzyklopädie im Wandel vom Hochmittelalter bis zur frühen Neuzeit. Munich: Fink, 2002, 511–32.Google Scholar
Meijers, Debora J. “The Places of Painting: The Survival of Mnemotechnics in Christian von Mechel’s Gallery Arrangement in Vienna (1778–1781).” In Reinink, Wessel and Stumpel, Jeroen (eds.), Memory and Oblivion. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, 205–11.Google Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. Die Bibliothek des Joachim Jungius: Ein Beitrag zur Historia litteraria der frühen Neuzeit. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992.Google Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. “Enzyklopädie der Welt und Verzettelung des Wissens: Aporien der Empirie bei Joachim Jungius.” In Eybl, Franz (ed.), Enzyklopädien der Frühen Neuzeit: Beiträge zu ihrer Erforschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1995, 162–87.Google Scholar
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease: Marcello Malpighi and Seventeenth-Century Anatomy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Torsten, and Popplow, Marcus. “To Employ Each of Nature’s Products in the Most Favorable Way Possible”: Nature as a Commodity in Eighteenth-Century German Economic Discourse.” Historical Social Research 29:4 (2004), 4–40.Google Scholar
Michel, Wolfgang. “Hans Jurian Hancke – ein Breslauer in Japan.” In Dokufutsu Bungaku Kenkyû, No. 46. Fukuoka: Kyûshû University, 1996, 59–88.Google Scholar
Milam, Erika, and Nye, Robert. “An Introduction to Scientific Masculinities.” Osiris 30:1 (2015), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, David Marshall, and Jalobeanu, Dana. “Introduction: The Disciplinary Revolutions of Early Modern Philosophy and Science.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Peter. History and Its Objects: Antiquarianism and Material Culture since 1500. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, Horst. Vernunft und Kritik: Deutsche Aufklärung im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar
Moser, Stephanie. “Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration.” Isis 105:1 (2014), 58–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mühlpfordt, Günter. “Halle-Leipziger Aufklärung: Kern der Mitteldeutschen Aufklärung, Führungskraft der Deutschen Aufklärung, Paradigma in Europa.” In Jerouschek, Günter and Sames, Arno (eds.), Aufklärung und Erneuerung: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Universität Halle im ersten Jahrhundert ihres Bestehens 1694–1806. Halle: Werner Dausien, 1994, 46–55.Google Scholar
Müller, Uwe. “Die Leges der Academia Naturae Curiosorum 1652–1872.” In Toellner, Richard et al. (eds.), Die Gründung der Leopoldina – Academia Naturae Curiosorum – im historischen Kontext. Johann Laurentius Bausch zum 400. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, 2008, 243–64.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. Enlightenment Underground: Radical Germany, 1680–1720. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. Moderne aus dem Untergrund. Vol. 1: Radikale Frühaufklärung in Deutschland 1680–1720. Hamburg: Meiner, 2002.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. Moderne aus dem Untergrund. Vol. 2: Clandestine Vernunft. Göttingen: Wallenstein, 2018.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. Knowledge Lost: A New View of Early Modern Intellectual History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. Die Unanständige Gelehrtenrepublik: Wissen, Libertinage und Kommunikation in der Frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muyskens, Mark. “pHantastic Fluorescence.” Journal of Chemical Education, 83:5 (2006), 768A–B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naum, Magdalena, and Nordin, Jonas M.. “Introduction: Situating Scandinavian Colonialism.” In Naum, Magdalena and Nordin, Jonas (eds.), Scandinavian Colonialism and the Rise of Modernity: Small Time Agents in a Global Arena. New York: Springer, 2013, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelles, Paul. “Historia Literaria and Morhof: Private Teaching and Professorial Libraries at the University of Kiel.” In Waquet, Françoise (ed.), Mapping the World of Learning: The Polyhistor of Daniel Georg Morhof. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2000, 31–56.Google Scholar
Nelles, Paul. “Historia literaria at Helmstedt: Books, Professors and Students in the Early Enlightenment University.” In Zedelmaier, Helmut and Mulsow, Martin (eds.), Die Praktiken der Gelehrsamkeit in der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, 147–76.Google Scholar
Neville, Kristoffer. The Art and Culture of Scandinavian Central Europe, 1550–1720. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Newman, William. Gehennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey, an American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jens. Lang schon verschwunden ist die Burg: Geschichte(n) von der Möweninsel und ihren Bewohnern im Laufe der Jahrhunderte. Norderderstdt: Books on Demand, 2021.Google Scholar
Nordin, Jonas Monié. The Scandinavian Early Modern World: A Global Historical Archaeology. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutz, Thomas. “Varietäten des Menschengeschlechts”: Die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in der Zeit der Auflklärung. Cologne: Böhlau, 2009.Google Scholar
Nyden, Tammy. “De Volder’s Cartesian Physics and Experimental Pedagogy.” In Dobre, Mihnea and Nyden, Tammy (eds.), Cartesian Empiricisms. Dordrecht: Springer: 2014, 227–49.Google Scholar
Nye, Mary Jo. From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines, 1800–1950. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oechslin, Werner. “‘Barock’: Zu den negativen Kriterien der Begriffsbestimmung in klassizisticher und späterer Zeit.” In Garber, Klaus (ed.), Europäische Barock-Rezeption. Part 2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1991, 1225–54.Google Scholar
Olden-Jørgensen, Sebastian, “Nicholas Steno and René Descartes: A Cartesian Perspective on Steno’s Scientific Development.” In Rosenberg, G. D. (ed.), The Revolution in Geology from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Geological Society of America Memoirs, 203. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 2009, 149–57.Google Scholar
Olesko, Kathryn. “Commentary: On Institutes, Investigations, and Scientific Training.” In Coleman, William and Holmes, Frederic Lawrence (eds.), The Investigative Enterprise: Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988, 295–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omodeo, Pietro Daniel. Political Epistemology: The Problem of Ideology in Science Studies. Cham: Springer, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Martha. The Rise of Scientific Societies in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1913], 1938.Google Scholar
Otabe, Tanehisa. “From ‘Clothing’ to “Organ of Reason’: An Essay on the Theories of Metaphor in German Philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment.” In Radman, Zdravko (ed.), From a Metaphorical Point of View: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995, 7–26.Google Scholar
Ottaviani, Alessandro. “The Coral of Death: Kunst- und Wunderkammern between Temporality and Allegory.” Nuncius 30 (2015), 281–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, Denise. “Experimentation in the Agricultural Enlightenment: Place, Profit, and Norms of Knowledge-Making in Eighteenth-Century Germany.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 72 (2018), 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotrowski, Swantje. Sozialgechichte der Kieler Professorenschaft 1665–1815. Kiel: Wachholtz, 2018.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, Swantje. “Vom Wandel der Fakultätenhierarchie und der Entwicklung des Lehrkörpers an der Christiana Albertina in der Zeit von 1665 bis 1815.” In Auge, Oliver (ed.), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel: 350 Jahren Wirken in Stadt, Land und Welt. Kiel: Wachholtz, 2015, 451–97.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Sharing Cases: The Observationes in Early Modern Medicine.” Early Science and Medicine 15:3 (2010), 193–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomata, Gianna. “A Word of the Empirics: The Ancient Concept of Observation and Its Recovery in Early Modern Medicine.” Annals of Science 68 (2011), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomata, Gianna, and Siraisi, Nancy G., eds. Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard. “Epilogue.” In Kelley, Donald and Popkin, Richard (eds.), The Shapes of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991, 215–20.Google Scholar
Popper, Nicholas. “An Ocean of Lies: The Problem of Historical Evidence in the Sixteenth Century.” Huntington Library Quarterly 74:3 (2011), 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. “The Scientific Revolution and Universities.” In de Ridder-Symoens, Hilde (ed.), A History of the University in Europe. Vol. II, Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500–1800). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 531–62.Google Scholar
Raabe, Paul, ed. Öffentliche und private Bibliotheken im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Raritätenkammern, Forschungsinstrumente oder Bildungsstätten? Bremen: Jacobi, 1977.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Rhoda. When Geologists Were Historians, 1665–1750. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratjen, Henning. Chronik der Universität zu Kiel. Kiel: Mohr, 1857.Google Scholar
Ratjen, Henning. Zur Geschichte der Kieler Universitätsbibliothek. Kiel: Mohr, 1862.Google Scholar
Ray, Aniruddha. “Mughal-Danish Relations during the 17th and Early 18th Century Bengal.” In Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 58th Session, Bangalore. Aligarh: Indian History Congress, 1998, 285–94.Google Scholar
Rebohm, Simon. “‘Audio quibusdam scholia observationibus addita displicere.’: Textgenre und Kommunikation in den Miscellanea curiosa.” In Eckart, Wolfgang and Schott, Heinz (eds.), Strategien der Kommunikation von Naturwissen und Medizin: Zeitschriften gelehrter Akademien in der frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2022, 157–66.Google Scholar
Reed, T. J. Light in Germany: Scenes from an Unknown Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinbacher, W. Rudolph. Leben, Arbeit und Umwelt des Arztes: Johann Daniel Major (1634–1693), Eine Biographie aus dem 17. Jahrhundert, mit neuen Erkenntnissen. Linsengericht: Kroeber, 1998.Google Scholar
Reinke, Johannes. Der älteste Botanische Garten Kiels: Urkundlich Darstellung der Begründung eines Universitäts-Instituts im siebzehnten Jahrhundert. Kiel: University of Kiel, 1912.Google Scholar
Richter, Sandra. A History of Poetics: German Scholarly Aesthetics and Poetics in International Context, 1770–1960. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Winfried. Die Gottorfer Hofmusik: Studie zur Musikkultur eines absolutistischen Hofstaates im 17. Jahrhundert. PhD thesis, Kiel University, 1985.Google Scholar
Ridder-Symoens, Hilde. “The Mobility of Medical Students from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries: The Institutional Context.” In Cunningham, Andrew and Grell, Ole Peter (eds.), Centres of Medical Excellence? Medical Travel and Education in Europe, 1500–1789. London: Routledge, 2010, 47–89.Google Scholar
Risbjerg Ekildsen, Kasper. “Print, Fashion, and the Making of the Enlightenment Philosopher.” In Haakonssen, Knud and Hostbøll, Henrik (eds.), Northern Antiquities and National Identities: Symposium Held in Copenhagen August 2005. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy, 2008, 126–44.Google Scholar
Risbjerg Ekildsen, Kasper. “Virtues of History: Exercises, Seminars, and the Emergence of the German Historical Discipline, 1830–1900.” In Chang, Ku-ming and Rocke, Alan (eds.), A Global History of Research Education: Disciplines, Institutions, and Nations, 1840–1950. Vol. XXXIV/1: History of Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 27–40.Google Scholar
Roelli, Philipp. Latin as the Language of Science and Learning. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rößler, Hole. “Utopie der Bildung. Der Entwurf einer ‘Polymathia experimentalis’ in Johann Daniel Majors See-farth nach der Neuen Welt/ ohne Schiff und Segel (1670).” In Schock, Flemming (ed.), Polyhistorismus und Buntschriftstellerei: Populäre Wissensformen und Wissenskultur in der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röhrich, Heinz. “Johann Daniel Majors erste Anatomie an der Universität Kiel vom 31.1. bis 6.2.1666.” Anatomischer Anzeiger 124 (1969), 375–88.Google Scholar
Roling, Bernd. “Johann Ludwig Hannemann (1640–1724) and the Defense of Paracelsism in Kiel.” In Omodeo, Pietro Daniel and Wels, Volkhard (eds.), Natural Knowledge and Aristotelianism at Early Modern Protestant Universities. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2019, 271–98.Google Scholar
Roling, Bernd. Odins Imperium: der Rudbeckianismus als Paradigma an den skandinavischen Universitäten (1680–1860). Leiden: Brill, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roling, Bernd, and Schirg, Bernhard, eds. Boreas Rising: Antiquarianism and National Narratives in 17th- and 18th-century Scandinavia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, Anna Marie, ed. The Correspondence of Dr. Martin Lister (1639–1712). Vol. 1: 1662–1677. Leiden: Brill, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscioni, Lisa. “Francesco Giuseppe Borri.” DSI 1: 216–7.Google Scholar
Ross, Tricia. “Anthropologia: An (Almost) Forgotten Early Modern History.” Journal of the History of Ideas 79:1 (2018), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowley-Conwy, Peter. From Genesis to Prehistory: The Archaeological Three Age System and Its Contested Reception in Denmark, Britain, and Ireland. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin. The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Palaeontology. New York: Watson, 1976.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin. Worlds before Adam: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudy, Seth. Literature and Encyclopedism in Enlightenment Britain: The Pursuit of Complete Knowledge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saine, Thomas. The Problem of Being Modern or the German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Saisselin, Rémy G. The Enlightenment against the Baroque: Economics and Aesthetics in the Eighteenth Century Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sander, Sabine. “Aufklärung vor der Aufklärung? Zum populärmedizinischen Werk des Arztes und Bestsellerautors Christoph von Hellwig (1663–1721).” Medizinhistorisches Journal 34:3–4 (1999), 245–308.Google ScholarPubMed
Sasse, Barbara. Der Weg zu einer archäologischen Wissenschaft: Die Ur- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie 1630–1850. Berlin: William De Gruyter, 2016.Google Scholar
Sawilla, Jan Marco. “Von ‘Todten-Töpffen und anderen Merckwürdigkeiten’: Zur Reflexion heidnischer Bestattungsriten und ihren Überresten in Norddeutschland um 1700.” In Hakelberg, Dietrich and Wiworra, Ingo (eds.), Vorwelten und Vorzeiten: Archäologie als Spiegel historischen Bewussteins in der Frühen Neuzeit. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz, 2010, 481–511.Google Scholar
Scattola, Merio. “‘Historia literaria’ als ‘historia pragmatica’: Die pragmatische Bedeutung der Geschichtsschreibung im intellektuellen Unternehmen der Gelehrtengeschichte.” In Grunert, Frank and Vollhardt, Friedrich (eds.), Historia literaria: Neuordnungen des Wissens im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Akademie, 2007, 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrenberg, Anke. “Christian Cassius (1609–1676). Dichter, ‘Netzwerker,’ Kanzlei-direktor – eine Karriere am Eutiner Hof des 17. Jahrhunderts.” In Auge, Oliver and Scharrenberg, Anke (eds.), Die Diener der Fürstbischöfe: Der Eutiner Hof im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Kiel: Wachholtz, 2023, 111–35.Google Scholar
Schirg, Bernhard. “The Daphnic Fate of Camerarius. Sweden’s First Printed Emblem Book Revealed in Olof Rudbeck the Younger’s Botanical Dissertation (1686).” In Enenkel, Karl and Smith, Paul (eds.), Emblems and the Natural World. Leiden: Brill, 2017, 227–70.Google Scholar
Schirg, Bernhard. “The Northern Face of January. Roman Narratives of Early Cultural History (Janus, Saturn, Numa) and Their Appropriation in Swedish Antiquarianism.” In Roling, Bernd and Schirg, Bernard (eds.), Boreas Rising: Antiquarianism and National Narratives in 17th- and 18th-Century Scandinavia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019, 151–78.Google Scholar
Schlegelmilch, Sabine. “The Scientific Revolution in Marburg.” In Friedenthal, Meelis, Mart, Hanspeter, and Seidel, Robert (eds.), Early Modern Disputations and Dissertations in an Interdisciplinary and European Context. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 288–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Harry. Das Nachlaß-Inventar des Malers Jürgen Ovens. Leipzig: Haessel, 1913.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Topica universalis: Eine Modellgeschichte humanistischer und barocker Wissenschaft. Hamburg: Meiner, 1983.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Schonbeck, Charlotte. 300 Jahre Physik und Astronomie an der Kieler Universität. Kiel: F. Hirt, 1965.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. The Aristotelian Tradition and the Renaissance Universities. London: Variorum, 1984.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Rudolf. Die Naturwissenschaften an der Philipps-Universität Marburg. Marburg: Elwert, 1978.Google Scholar
Schnapp, Alain. The Discovery of the Past, trans. Innes, Ian and Varndell, Gillian. New York: Abrams, 1997.Google Scholar
Schnapp, Alain. “The Pre-Adamites: An Abortive Attempt to Invent Pre-History in the Seventeenth Century.” In Ligota, Christopher and Quantin, Jean-Louis (eds.), History of Scholarship: A Selection of Papers from the Seminar on the History of Scholarship Held Annually at the Warburg Institute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 400–12.Google Scholar
Schock, Flemming “Enzyklopädie, Kalendar. Wochenblatt. Wissenspopularisierung und Medienw.andel im 17. Jahrhundert.” In von Greyerz, Kaspar, Flubacher, Silvia, and Senn, Philipp (eds.), Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Geschichte des Wissens im Dialog – Connecting Science and Knowledge. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013, 155–85.Google Scholar
Schock, Flemming Die Text-Kunstkammer. Populäre Wissensammlungen des Barock am Beispiel der “Relationes Curiosae” von E. W. Happel. Cologne: Böhlau,2011.Google Scholar
Scholz, Leander. Das Archiv der Klugheit: Strategien des Wissens um 1700. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secord, James. “Knowledge in Transit.” Isis 95:4 (2004), 654–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifert, Siegfried. “‘Historia literaria’ an der Wende zur Aufklärung: Barocktradition und Neuansatz in Morhofs ‘Polyhistor.’” In Garber, Klaus (ed.), Europäische Barock-Rezeption. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 1991, 215–28.Google Scholar
Sgarbi, Marco. The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism: Logic and Epistemology in the British Isles (1570–1689). Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, Jole. “Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark.” Early Science and Medicine 8:3 (2003), 210–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapin, Steven. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology.” Social Studies of Science 14:14 (1984), 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Siegel, Steffen “Die ‘gantz accurate’ Kunstkammer. Visuelle Konstruktion und Normierung eines Repräsentationsraums in der Frühen Neuzeit.” In Bredekamp, Horst and Schneider, Pablo (eds.), Visuelle Argumentationen: Die Mysterien der Repräsentation und die Berechenbarkeit der Welt. Munich: Fink, 2006, 156–82.Google Scholar
Skogh, Lisa. Material Worlds: Queen Hedwig Eleonora as Collector and Patron of the Arts. Stockholm: Center for History of Science at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2013.Google Scholar
Skouen, Tina. “Science versus Rhetoric? Sprat’s History of the Royal Society Reconsidered.” Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 29:1 (2011), 23–52.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter Spheres. Pasadena, CA: Semiotexte, 2011–16.Google Scholar
Smith, Justin E. H. “Spirit as Intermediary in Post-Cartesian Natural Philosophy.” In Göttler, Christine and Neuber, Wolfgang (eds.), Spirits Unseen: The Representation of Subtle Bodies in Early Modern European Culture. Leiden: Brill, 2008, 269–92.Google Scholar
Smith, Justin E. H. “Thinking from Traces: Nicolas Steno’s Palaeontology and the Method of Science.” In Laerke, Mogens and Andrault, Raphaele (eds.), Steno and the Philosophers. Leiden: Brill, 2018, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Pamela. The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela, and Findlen, Paula, eds. Merchants and Marvels: Commerce, Science and Art in Early Modern Europe. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Speer, Andreas. “Schüler und Meister.” In Speer, Andreas and Jeschke, Thomas (eds.), Schüler und Meister. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016, xi–xvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielmann, Heinz, and Drees, Jan, eds. Die Herzöge und Ihre Sammlungen. Schleswig: Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum, 1997.Google Scholar
Spielmann, Heinz, Drees, Jan, Doering, Birgit, and Kuhl, Uta, eds. Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum Renaissance und Barock. Schleswig: Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum, 1997.Google Scholar
Stagl, Justin. A History of Curiosity: The Theory of Travel, 1500–1800. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Stagl, Justin. “Homo Collector. Zur Anthropologie und Soziologie des Sammelns.” In Assmann, Aelida, Gomille, Monika, and Rippl, Gabriele (eds.), Sammler-Bibliophile-Exzentriker. Tübingen: G. Narr, 1998, 37–54.Google Scholar
Stafford, Barbara. Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter. Chartier, Roger, Mowery, J. Franklin, and Wolfe, Heather. “Hamlet’s Tables and the Technologies of Writing in Renaissance England.” Shakespeare Quarterly 55:4 (2004), 379–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Laura. “Emergence.” Isis 110:2 (2019), 332–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffgen, U. “Die Gräber der frühen und älteren Bronzezeit in Schleswig-Holstein und Dänemark.” Studien zu Gräbern und Grabeinrichtung 54–55 (1999), 97–200.Google Scholar
Steiner, Arpad. “A Mirror for Scholars of the Baroque.” Journal of the History of Ideas 1:3 (1940), 320–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinle, Friedrich. “Physikalische Wissenschaften.” In Eckert, Georg, Ludwig, Ulrike, Steiner, Benjamin, and Wesch, Jörg (eds.), Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit. Vol. 9. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2009.Google Scholar
Stichweh, Rudolf. Zur Enstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen: Physik in Deutschland, 1740–1890. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.Google Scholar
Stormer, Nathan. “Articulation: A Working Paper on Rhetoric and Taxis.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90:3 (2004), 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strazzoni, Andrea. Burchard de Volder and the Age of the Scientific Revolution. Cham: Springer, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroup, Alice. A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage, and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Strub, Christian. Weltzusammenhänge: Kettenkonzepte in der Europäische Philosophie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2011.Google Scholar
Terrall, Mary. “Speculation and Experiment in Enlightenment Life Sciences.” In Müller-Wille, Staffan and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.), Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture, 1500–1870. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007, 253–76.Google Scholar
Thomsen, E. “Niels Stensen-Steno, in the World of Collections and Museums.” In Rosenberg, Gary D. (ed.), The Revolution of Geology from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 2009, 75–91.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. Part 4. New York: Cornell University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Toellner, Richard, Müller, Uwe, Parthier, Benno, and Berg, Wieland, eds. Die Gründung der Leopoldina - Academia Naturae Curiosorum - im historischen Kontext. Johann Laurentius Bausch zum 400. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, 2008.Google Scholar
Trevisani, Francesco. “Tra vitalismo e meccanicismo: su alcuni esperimenti mostrati a Leibniz durante la sua visita a Marburg del 1687.” Physis 29:3 (1992), 677–701.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Troitzsch, Ulrich, ed. “Nützliche Künste.” Kultur- und Sozialgeschichte der Technik im 18. Jahrhundert. Waxmann: Münster, 1999.Google Scholar
Unsicker, Karin. Weltliche Barockprosa in Schleswig-Holstein. Neumünster: Wachholtz, 1974.Google Scholar
Vakkari, Pertti. “Reading, Knowledge of Books, and Libraries as a Basis for the Conception of Scholarship in Eighteenth-Century Germany.” Libraries & Culture 26:1 (1991), 66–86.Google Scholar
Valleriani, Matteo. “Sixteenth-Century Hydraulic Engineers and the Emergence of Empiricism.” In Demeter, Tamás, Murphy, Kathryn, and Zittel, Claus (eds.), Conflicting Values of Inquiry: Ideologies of Epistemology in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2015, 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, Hans. Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German Enlightenment. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Fernando. Les Sciences de l’âme XVIe–XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Champion, 2006.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. Plato and Aristotle. Vol. 3: Order and History, ed. Germino, Dante. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wade, Mara. “Ballet, Kunstkammer, and the Education of Princess Hedwig Eleonora at the Gottorf Court.” In Neville, Kristoffer and Skogh, Lisa (eds.), Queen Hedwig Eleonora and the Arts: Court Culture in Seventeenth-Century Northern Europe. London: Routledge, 2017, 159–78.Google Scholar
Weber von Rosenkrantz, Waldemar. “Die Familie von Thienen.” Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Schleswig-Holsteinische Geschichte 37 (1907), 221–374.Google Scholar
Wellmon, Chad Organizing Enlightenment: Information Overload and the Invention of the Modern Research University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, Jan C. “A World of Signs: Baroque Pansemioticism, the Polyhistor and the Early Modern Wunderkammer.” Journal of the History of Ideas 62:4 (2001), 633–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weststeijn, Thijs. “‘Knowing No Other Paintings than Their Shields’: The Germanic Origins of Art in the Seventeenth Century.” In Lee, Christina and McLelland, Nicola (eds.), Germania Remembered 1500–2009: Commemorating and Inventing a Germanic Past. Tempe, AZ: ACMRS Press, 2012, 43–74.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, Conrad. “Polyhistors Glück und Ende. Von Daniel Georg Morhof zum jungen Lessing.” In Burger, Heinz Otto and von See, Klaus (eds.), Festschrift Gottfried Weber. Bad Homburg: Gehlen, 1967, 215–35.Google Scholar
Wiesenfeldt, Gerhard. Leerer Raum in Minervas Haus: Experimentalle Naturlehre an der Universität Leiden, 1675–1715. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2002.Google Scholar
Whaley, Joachim. Religious Toleration and Social Change in Hamburg, 1529–1819. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Peter J. P. “Earliest Extant Painting of Greenlanders.” In Feest, Christian F. (ed.), Indians and Europe: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays. Aachen: Alano, 1989, 141–60.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. “The Rise and Decline of University Disciplines in the Sciences.” In Jurkovich, R. and Paelinck, J. H. P. (eds.), Problems in Interdisciplinary Studies. Rotterdam: Erasmus University, 1984, 10–25.Google Scholar
Whitmer, Kelly. The Halle Orphanage as Scientific Community: Observation, Eclecticism, and Pietism in the Early Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmer, Kelly. “Imagining Uses for Things: Teaching ‘Useful Knowledge’ in the Early Eighteenth Century.” History of Science 55 (2017), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitmer, Kelly. “Projects and Pedagogical Expectations: Inside P. J. Marperger’s ‘Golden Clover Leaf’ (Trifolium), 1700–1730.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 72 (2018), 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Gerhild Scholz. Mediating Culture in the Seventeenth-Century German Novel: Eberhard Werner Happel, 1647–1690. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wolf, Cornelia. “Die Beschreibung ur- und frühgeschichtlicher Funde in handschriftlichen und gedruckten Quellen des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts.” In Hakelberg, Dietrich and Wiwjorra, Ingo (eds.), Vorwelten und Vorzeiten: Archäologie als Spiegel historischen Bewußtseins in der Frühen Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2010, 67–89.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Charles. “Boundary Crossings: The Blurring of the Human/Animal Divide as Naturalization of the Soul in Early Modern Philosophy.” In Presti, Roberto Lo and Buchenau, Stefanie (eds.), Human and Animal Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy and Medicine. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2017, 147–72.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Charles T., and Gal, Ofer, eds. The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge: Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Larry. “Discovering Cultural Perspective: The Intellectual History of Anthropological Thought in the Age of Enlightenment.” In Wolff, Larry and Cipolloni, Marco (eds.), The Anthropology of the Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wölfflin, Heinrich. Die Kunst der Renaissance: Italien und das deutsche Formgefühl. Munich: Bruckmann, 1931.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, Heinrich. Kunstliche Grundbegriffe: Das Problem der Stilentwicklung in der Neueren Kunst. Munich: Bruckmann, 1915.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, Heinrich. Renaissance und Barock: Eine Untersuchung über Wesen und Entstehung des Barockstils in Italien. Munich: Ackermann, 1888.Google Scholar
Wokler, Robert. “From l’homme physique to l’homme moral and Back: Towards a History of Enlightenment Anthropology.” History of the Human Sciences 6 (1993), 121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. “From Francis Bacon’s Historia Literarum to Samuel Johnson’s Literary History: The Catalogus Bibliothecae Harleianae (1743–1745).” In Bautz, A. and Gregory, J. (eds.), Libraries, Books, and Collectors of Texts, 1600–1900. New York: Routledge, 2018, 139–54.Google Scholar
Würgler, Andreas. “Fama und Rumor: Gerücht, Aufruhr und Presse im Ancien Régime.” Werkstatt Geschichte 15 (1996), 20–32.Google Scholar
Yamada, Toshihiro. “Kircher and Steno on the ‘Geocosm’, with a Reassessment of the Role of Gassendi’s Works.” In Vai, Gian Battista and Glen, W. Caldwell, E. (eds.), The Origins of Geology in Italy. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 2006, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, Richard. Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard. Notebooks, English Virtuosi, and Early Modern Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zaunstöck, Holger. Sozietätslandschaft und Mitgliederstrukturen Die mitteldeutschen Aufklärungsgesellschaften im 18. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedelmaier, Helmut. Bibliotheca universalis und Bibliotheca selecta. Das Problem der Ordnung des Gelehrten Wissens in der frühen Neuzeit. Cologne: Böhlau, 1992.Google Scholar
Zedelmaier, Helmut, and Mulsow, Martin, eds. Die Praktiken der Gelehrsamkeit in der Frühen Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Vera Keller, University of Oregon
  • Book: Curating the Enlightenment
  • Online publication: 07 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009506854.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Vera Keller, University of Oregon
  • Book: Curating the Enlightenment
  • Online publication: 07 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009506854.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Vera Keller, University of Oregon
  • Book: Curating the Enlightenment
  • Online publication: 07 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009506854.016
Available formats
×