We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2009
Ligand-field theory
Limitations of crystal-field theory
The limitations of crystal-field theory became apparent soon after its formulation by Bethe (1929). Van Vleck, who was primarily responsible for its early applications, recognized that the point-ion model on which it is based is quantitatively unreliable, and proposed an alternative formulation based on covalent bonding [Van Vleck (1935), Van Vleck and Sherman (1935)], now called ligand-field theory [Ballhausen (1962)]. Nevertheless, the popularity of crystal-field theory with adjustable parameters remains undiminished, contrary to expectation [Jørgensen (1971)]. By virtue of its elegance and relative conceptual simplicity, it continues to provide a useful framework for summarizing and interpolating empirical spectral information [Morrison (1992), Kaminskii (1996)].
The essential similarity of ligand-field theory and crystal-field theory is attributable to the underlying symmetry of the complex, and its implications for the wave functions and energy levels involved. However, ligand-field theory has the capacity to explain phenomena not contemplated in crystal-field theory, such as the nephelauxetic effect discussed in §4.4.8 and §9.6.3 and transferred hyperfine interactions [Spaeth et al. (1992)]. In addition, models based on covalency provide a deeper understanding of optical properties addressed in preceding chapters, and may ultimately yield quantitatively reliable predictions of crystal-field parameters.
Molecular orbitals
In the molecular-orbital theory of covalency [Hund (1927b), Mulliken (1928)], electrons occupy orbital wave functions which are delocalized over the entire complex consisting, for example, of a transition-metal ion and its immediate ligands. An approximate molecular orbital can be constructed as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
