Book contents
- Cryptic Species
- The Systematics Association Special Volume Series
- Cryptic Species
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Cryptic Species
- 3 Species Circumscription in Cryptic Clades
- 4 Multilevel Organismal Diversity in an Ontogenetic Framework as a Solution for the Species Concept
- 5 Diagnosability and Cryptic Nodes in Angiosperms
- 6 Connecting Micro- and Macro-Evolutionary Research
- 7 Coexisting Cryptic Species as a Model System in Integrative Taxonomy
- 8 The Implications of Coalescent Conspecific Genetic Samples in Plants
- 9 Guerrilla Taxonomy and Discriminating Cryptic Species
- 10 Cryptic Lineages among Seychelles Herpetofauna
- 11 Cryptic Diversity in European Terrestrial Flatworms of the Genus Microplana (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Geoplanidae)
- Index
- Systematics Association Special Volumes
- References
8 - The Implications of Coalescent Conspecific Genetic Samples in Plants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Book contents
- Cryptic Species
- The Systematics Association Special Volume Series
- Cryptic Species
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Cryptic Species
- 3 Species Circumscription in Cryptic Clades
- 4 Multilevel Organismal Diversity in an Ontogenetic Framework as a Solution for the Species Concept
- 5 Diagnosability and Cryptic Nodes in Angiosperms
- 6 Connecting Micro- and Macro-Evolutionary Research
- 7 Coexisting Cryptic Species as a Model System in Integrative Taxonomy
- 8 The Implications of Coalescent Conspecific Genetic Samples in Plants
- 9 Guerrilla Taxonomy and Discriminating Cryptic Species
- 10 Cryptic Lineages among Seychelles Herpetofauna
- 11 Cryptic Diversity in European Terrestrial Flatworms of the Genus Microplana (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Geoplanidae)
- Index
- Systematics Association Special Volumes
- References
Summary
When samples from a single taxonomic species are resolved as monophyletic, or coalescent, in a phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, this is often the basis for “cryptic” or otherwise overlooked plant species. Here, we examine ecological evolutionary reasons behind genetic patterns within plant species.. We suggest that coalescence or monophyly of conspecific genetic samples occurs more commonly in animal than plant clades, which implies that plant species are more likely to have some combination of larger effective population sizes from a population or genomic perspective, inhabit less dispersal-limited habitats or niches, or have evolutionary younger ages. For woody plant species, we suspect that dry environments are more dispersal limited than wetter environments. We give examples that suggest coalescence of conspecific plant samples likely occurs more often among genetic samples taken from isolated populations that are phylogenetically niche conserved to the succulent biome. This is in comparison to those taken from isolated plant populations that are niche conserved to tropical wet forests. However, these suggested patterns will be context dependent. Recency of evolution, large effective population sizes, or polyploid genomes could work against detecting coalescent patterns of conspecific genetic samples in plant taxa that are niche conserved to the succulent biome.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cryptic SpeciesMorphological Stasis, Circumscription, and Hidden Diversity, pp. 197 - 212Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Bowers, J. E., Chapman, B. A., Rong, J., and Paterson, A. H. (2003) Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422: 433–438. doi:10.1038/nature01521Google Scholar
Cardoso, , D., Queiroz, L. P., de Lima, H. C., Suganuma, E., van den Berg, , C., and Lavin, M. (2013) A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages. American Journal of Botany 100: 403–421. doi:10.3732/ajb.1200276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, D., Queiroz, L. P., and Lima, , H. (2014) A taxonomic revision of the South American papilionoid genus Luetzelburgia (Fabaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 175: 328–375. doi:10.1111/boj.12153.Google Scholar
Cornetti, , L., Ficetola, , G., Hoban, S., and Vernesi, , C. (2015) Genetic and ecological data reveal species boundaries between viviparous and oviparous lizard lineages. Heredity 115: 517–526. doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.54.Google Scholar
Crisp, M. D. and Chandler, G. T. (1996) Paraphyletic species. Telopea 6(4): 813–844. doi:10.7751/telopea19963037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, M. D. and Cook, L. G. (2012) Phylogenetic niche conservatism: what are the underlying evolutionary and ecological causes? New Phytologist 2012(196): 681–694. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04298.xGoogle Scholar
Cui, L., Wall, P. K., Leebens‐Mack, J., Lindsay, B. G., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J. et al. (2006) Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Research 16: 738–749. doi:10.1101/gr.4825606CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado-Salinas, A., Thulin, M., Pasquet, R., Weeden, N., and Lavin, M. (2011) Vigna (Leguminosae) sensu lato: the names and identities of the American segregate genera. American Journal of Botany 98: 1694–1715. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Queiroz, K. (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56(6): 879–886. doi:10.1080/10635150701701083Google Scholar
Dexter, K. G., Lavin, M., Torke, B., Twyford, A., Kursar, T., Coley, P., Drake, C., Hollands, R., and Pennington, R.T. (2017) Dispersal assembly of rain forest tree communities across the Amazon basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 114: 2645–2650. doi:10.1073/pnas.1613655114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duno de Stefano, R., Carnevali Fernández-Concha, G., Lorena Can-Itza, L., and Lavin, M. (2010) The morphological and phylogenetic distinctions of Coursetia greenmanii (Leguminosae): taxonomic and ecological implications. Systematic Botany 35: 289–295. doi:10.1600/036364410791638360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duputie, A., Salick, J., and McKey, D. (2011) Evolutionary biogeography of Manihot (Euphorbiaceae), a rapidly radiating Neotropical genus restricted to dry environments. Journal of Biogeography 38: 1033–1043. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02474.x.Google Scholar
Fazekas, A. J., Kesankurti, P. R., Burgess, K. S., Percy, D. M., Graham, S. W., Barrett, S. C., Newmaster, S. G., Hajibabei, M., and Husband, B. C. (2009) Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers? Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 130–139. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02652.x.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A., de Oliveira, A. W., Carvalho-Sobrinho, J. G., and Souza, G. (2016) Karyotypic stability in the paleopolyploid genus Ceiba Mill. (Bombacoideae, Malvaceae). Brazilian Journal of Botany 39: 1087–1093. doi:10.1007/s40415-016-0296-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., and Malard, F. (2018) Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept. Molecular Ecology 27: 613–635. doi:10.1111/mec.14486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenstein, J. V., Broe, M. B., Folk, R. A., and Sinn, B. T. (2017) Biodiversity and the species concept: Lineages are not enough. Systematic Biology 66: 644–656. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw098.Google Scholar
Gagnon, E., Hughes, C. E., Lewis, G. P., and Bruneau, A. (2015) A new cryptic species in a new cryptic genus in the Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae) from the seasonally dry inter-Andean valleys of South America. Taxon 64: 468–490. doi:10.12705/643.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, E., Ringelberg, J. J., Bruneau, A., Lewis, G. P., and Hughes, C. E. (2019) Global Succulent Biome phylogenetic conservatism across the pantropical Caesalpinia Group (Leguminosae). New Phytologist 222: 1994–2008. doi:10.1111/nph.15633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallardo, M. H. (2017) Phylogenetics, Reticulation and Evolution, chapter 3, In Phylogenetics, ed. Abdurakhmonov IY. IntechOpen doi:10.5772/intechopen.68564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaynor, M. L., Ng, J., and Laport, R. G. (2018) Phylogenetic structure of plant communities: Are polyploids distantly related to co-occurring diploids? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6: 52. doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2010) African elephants are two distinct species. Nature doi:10.1038/news.2010.691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, P. (1981) Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae, In Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 2. Ed. Polhill, R. M. and Raven, P. M. pp. 427–463. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Govindarajulu, R., Hughes, C. E., and Bailey, C. D. (2011) Phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of diploid Leucaena (Leguminosae–Mimosoideae) reveal cryptic species diversity and patterns of allopatric divergent speciation. American Journal of Botany 98: 2049–2063. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100259.Google Scholar
Groves, C. (2016) Two African elephant species, not just one. Nature 538: 317. doi:10.1038/538317a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heethoff, M. (2018) Cryptic species – conceptual or terminological chaos? A response to Struck et al. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33: 310. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.006.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, P. M., Graham, S. W., and Little, D. P. (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 6(5): e19254. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollingsworth, P. M., Li, D. Z., van der Bank, M., and Twyford, A. D. (2016) Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 371. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0338.Google Scholar
Jiao, Y., Wickett, N. J., Ayyampalayam, S., Chanderbali, A. S., Landherr, L., Ralph, P. E. et al. (2011) Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97–100. doi:10.1038/nature09916CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joly, S., Rauscher, J. T., Sherman-Broyles, S. L., Brown, A. H. D., and Doyle, J. J. (2004) Evolutionary dynamics and preferential expression of homeologous 18S-5.8S-26S nuclear ribosomal genes in natural and artificial Glycine allopolyploids. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1409–1421. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. C., Nicolle, D., Steane, D. A., Vaillancourt, R. E., and Potts, B. M. (2016). High density, genome-wide markers and intra-specific replication yield an unprecedented phylogenetic reconstruction of a globally significant, speciose lineage of Eucalyptus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 105: 63–85. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellogg, E. A. (2016) Has the connection between polyploidy and diversification actually been tested? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 30: 25–32. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenen, E. J. M., Ojeda, D. I., Bakker, F. T., Wieringa, J. J., Kidner, C., Hardy, O. J., Pennington, R. T., Herendeen, P. S., Bruneau, A., and Hughes, C. E. (2020) The Origin of the Legumes is a Complex Paleopolyploid Phylogenomic Tangle Closely Associated with the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) Mass Extinction Event, Systematic Biology syaa041. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa041.Google Scholar
Latta, R. G. and Mitton, J. B. (1999) Historical separation and present gene flow through a zone of secondary contact in Ponderosa pine. Evolution, 53: 769–776. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05371.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavin, M. (1988) Systematics of Coursetia (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Systematic Botany Monographs 21: 1–167. doi:10.2307/25027701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavin, M. (1993) Systematics of the genus Poitea (Leguminosae): inferences from morphological and molecular data. Systematic Botany Monographs 37: 1–87. doi:10.2307/25027818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavin, M. (2006) Floristic and geographic stability of discontinuous seasonally dry tropical forests explains patterns of plant phylogeny and endemism, Chapter 19, In Neotropical Savannas and Seasonally Dry Forests: Plant Biodiversity, Biogeographic Patterns and Conservation. Ed. Pennington, R. T., Ratter, J. A., and Lewis, G. P. pp. 433–447. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. doi:10.1201/9781420004496.Google Scholar
Lavin, M. and Sousa-S., M. (1995) Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the tribe Robinieae. Systematic Botany Monographs 45: 1–165. doi:10.2307/25027850.Google Scholar
Lavin, M., Wojciechowski, M. F., Gasson, P., Hughes, C. H., and Wheeler, E. (2003) Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited: Coursetia and Gliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics. Systematic Botany 28: 387–409. www.jstor.org/stable/3094008Google Scholar
Lavin, M., Pennington, R. T., Hughes, C. E., Lewis, G. P., Delgado Salinas, A., Duno de Stefano, R., Queiroz, L. P, Cardoso, D., and Wojciechowski, M. F. (2018) DNA sequence variation among conspecific accessions of the legume Coursetia caribaea reveal geographically localized clades here ranked as species. Systematic Botany 43: 664–675. doi:10.1600/036364418X697382.Google Scholar
Martínez-Ramos, M., Balvanera, P., Arreola Villa, F., Mora, F., Manuel Maass, J., and Maza-Villalobos Méndez, S. (2018) Effects of long-term inter-annual rainfall variation on the dynamics of regenerative communities during the old-field succession of a neotropical dry forest. Forest Ecology and Management 426: 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.048.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Rodríguez, P., Carruthers, T., Wood, J. R. I., Williams, B. R. M., Weitemier, K., Kronmiller, B. Goodwin, Z., Sumadijaya, A., Anglin, N. L., Filer, D., Harris, D., Rausher, M. D., Kelly, S., Liston, A., and Scotland, R.W. (2019) A taxonomic monograph of Ipomoea integrated across phylogenetic scales. Nature Plants 5: 1136–1144. doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0535-4.Google Scholar
Naciri, Y. and Linder, H. P. (2015) Species delimitation and relationships: the dance of the seven veils. Taxon 64: 3–16. doi:10.12705/641.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira-Filho, A. T., Cardoso, D., Schrire, B. D., Lewis, G. P., Pennington, R. T., Brummer, T. J., Rotella, J., and Lavin, M. (2013) Stability structures tropical woody plant diversity more than seasonality: insights into the ecology of high legume-succulent-plant biodiversity. South African Journal of Botany 89: 42–57. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.06.010.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T. and Lavin, M. (2017) Dispersal, isolation and diversification with continued gene flow in an Andean tropical dry forest. Molecular Ecology 26: 3327–3329. doi:10.1111/mec.14182.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T., Lavin, M., and Oliveira-Filho, A. (2009) Woody plant diversity, evolution and ecology in the tropics: perspectives from seasonally dry tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 437–457. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120327.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T., Lavin, M., Särkinen, T., Lewis, G. P., Klitgaard, B. B., and Hughes, C. E. (2010) Contrasting plant diversification histories within the Andean biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107 (31): 13783–13787. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001317107.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T., Daza, A., Reynel, C., and Lavin, M. (2011) Poissonia eriantha (Leguminosae) from Cuzco, Peru: an overlooked species underscores a pattern of narrow endemism common to seasonally dry neotropical vegetation. Systematic Botany 36: 59–68. doi:10.1600/036364411X553135.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T. and Lavin, M. (2016) The contrasting nature of woody plant species in different neotropical forest biomes reflects differences in ecological stability. The New Phytologist 210: 25–37. doi:10.1111/nph.13724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persson, N. L., Eriksson, T., and Smedmark, J. E. E. (2020) Complex patterns of reticulate evolution in opportunistic weeds (Potentilla L., Rosaceae), as revealed by low-copy nuclear markers. BMC Evol Biol 20, 38. doi:10.1186/s12862-020-1597-7.Google Scholar
Pezzini, F. F. (2018) Phylogeny, taxonomy and biogeography of Ceiba Mill. (Malvaceae: Bombacoideae). PhD Thesis. The University of Edinburgh. 201 pp. https://hdl.handle.net/1842/36677.Google Scholar
Queiroz, L. P. and Lavin, M. (2011) Coursetia (Leguminosae) from eastern Brazil: nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA sequence analysis reveal the monophyly of three caatinga-inhabiting species. Systematic Botany 36: 69–79. doi:10.1600/036364411X553144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H. and Brouillet, L., (1994) Are many plant species paraphyletic? Taxon 43: 21–32. doi:10.2307/1223457Google Scholar
Ringelberg, J. J., Zimmermann, N. E., Weeks, A., Lavin, M., and Hughes, C. E. (2020) Biomes as evolutionary arenas: convergence and conservatism in the trans‐continental succulent biome. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29(7): 1100–1113. doi:10.1111/geb.13089.Google Scholar
Rohland, N., Reich, D., Mallick, S., Meyer, M., Green, R. E., Georgiadis, N. J., Roca, A. L., and Hofreiter, M. (2010) Genomic DNA Sequences from Mastodon and Woolly Mammoth Reveal Deep Speciation of Forest and Savanna Elephants. PLOS Biology 8(12): e1000564. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Särkinen, T. S., Marcelo Peña, J. L., Yomona, A. D., Simon, M. F., Pennington, R. T., and Hughes, C. E. (2011) Underestimated endemic species diversity in the Marañon seasonally dry tropical forests of Peru: An example from Mimosa (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Taxon 60: 139–150. doi:10.1002/tax.601012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Särkinen, T., Pennington, R. T., Lavin, M., Simon, M. F., and Hughes, C. E. (2012) Evolutionary islands in the Andes: persistence and isolation explains high endemism in Andean dry tropical forests. Journal of Biogeography 39: 884–900. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02644.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrire, B. D., Lavin, M. , and Lewis, G. P. (2005) Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies. In I. Friis & H. Balslev (eds.), Plant diversity and complexity patterns: local, regional and global dimensions. Biologiske Skrifter 55: 375–422.Google Scholar
Simon, M. F., Grether, R. Queiroz, L. P., Skema, C., Pennington, R. T., and Hughes, C. E. (2009) Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 20359–20364. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903410106.Google Scholar
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C. et al. (2009) Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 96: 336–348. doi:/10.3732/ajb.0800079Google Scholar
Souza, G., Costa, L., Guignard, M. S., Van-Lume, B., Pellicer, J., Gagnon, E., Leitch, I. J. , and Lewis, G. P. (2019) Do tropical plants have smaller genomes? Correlation between genome size and climatic variables in the Caesalpinia Group (Caesalpinioideae, Leguminosae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38: 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2019.03.002.Google Scholar
Struck, T. H., Feder, J. L., Bendiksby, M., Birkeland, S., Cerca, J., Gusarov, V. I., Kistenich, S., Larsson, K. H., Liow, L. H., Nowak, M. D., Stedje, B., Bachmann, L., and Dimitrov, D. (2017) Finding evolutionary processes hidden in cryptic species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33: 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struck, . Feder, T. H., Bendiksby, J. L., Birkeland, M., Cerca, S., Gusarov, J., Kistenich, V. I., Larsson, S., Liow, K. H., Nowak, L. H., Stedje, M. D., Bachmann, B., (2018) Cryptic species – more than terminological chaos: A reply to Heethoff. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33: 310–312. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.008.Google Scholar
Struck, T. H. and Cerca, J. (2019) Cryptic species and their evolutionary significance. eLS (2019), pp. 1–9. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0028292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., Sabatier, D., Baraloto, C., Salomão, R. P., Guevara, J. E., Phillips, O. L., Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., Molino, J. F. et al. (2013) Hyperdominance in the Amazonian Tree Flora. Science 342: 1243092. doi:10.1126/science.1243092.Google Scholar
Thiv, M., van der Niet, T., Rutschmann, F., Thulin, M., Brune, T., and Linder, H. P. (2011) Old—New World and trans-African disjunctions of Thamnosma (Rutaceae): intercontinental long-distance dispersal and local differentiation in the succulent biome. American Journal of Botany 98: 76–87. doi:10.3732/ajb.1000339.Google Scholar
Thulin, M., Lavin, M., Pasquet, R., and Delgado-Salinas, A. (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of Wajira (Leguminosae): A monophyletic segregate of Vigna centered in the Horn of Africa region. Systematic Botany 29: 903–920. doi:10.1600/0363644042451035Google Scholar
Trabuco da Cruz, D., Idárraga, Á., Banda, K., van den Berg, C., Queiroz, L. P., Pennington, R. T., Lavin, M., and Cardoso, D. (2018) Ancient speciation of the papilionoid legume Luetzelburgia jacana, a newly discovered species in an inter-Andean seasonally dry valley of Colombia. Taxon 67: 931–943. doi:10.12705/675.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Peer, Y., Fawcett, J. A., Proost, S., Sterck, L., and Vandepoele, K. (2009) The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends Plant Sci. 14: 680–688. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.09.001.Google Scholar
Vargas, O. M., Ortiz, E. M., and Simpson, B. B. (2017) Conflicting phylogenomic signals reveal a pattern of reticulate evolution in a recent high-Andean diversification (Asteraceae: Astereae: Diplostephium). New Phytologist 214: 1736–1750. doi:10.1111/nph.14530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willyard, A., Gernandt, D. S., Potter, K., Hipkins, V., Marquardt, P., Mahalovich, M. F., Langer, S. K., Telewski, F. W., Cooper, B., Douglas, C., Finch, K., Karemera, H. H., Lefler, J., Lea, P., and Wofford, A. (2017) Pinus ponderosa: A checkered past obscured four species. American Journal of Botany 104: 161–181. doi:10.3732/ajb.1600336.Google Scholar
Wood, J. R. I., Muñoz-Rodríguez, P., Williams, B. R. M. , and Scotland, R. W. (2020) A foundation monograph of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in the New World. Phytokeys 143: 1–843. doi:10.3897/phytokeys.143.32821.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by