We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
The Crisis of Democratization in the Greater Horn of Africa Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
Introduction
This chapter looks at the construction of democracy in Kenya, one of many African countries that, over time, has been subjected to all sorts of external pressures that have served extra-continental interests; pressure that produced their own counter-force which made democracy very contested as concept and practice.
The meaning of the term ‘democracy’ is also contested, partly because ‘democracy’ has become a tool for use in geo-political warfare. It has particular attributes and applications that end up making it relative. Among them is the fact that democracy is only one form of government in a state but it may not be the only one. It is, as Churchill claimed, ‘insurance’ for the people in the concerned state (Langworth 2009). Ideally, it is the involvement of citizens and interests, although not necessarily the people as individuals, in the governance of the state. It can be, as Kidane Mengisteab argues, a reconciliation of the interests of modern and traditional institutions in Africa (2011: 12–14).
In theory, democracy strives to give a stake to, and involves, as many people within the state as possible to ensure they have a direct interest in maintaining the well-being of that state. Those who believe that governments should be expressions of the will of the people emphasize the subordinate role of governors and governments to the collective will of the people, failure in which they can be replaced. These include Chinaman Confucius insisting in the sixth century BCE that rulers had to be virtuous, respectful of and considerate to people, or be overthrown. ‘Without the trust of the people’, he declared, ‘no government can stand’ (McArthur 2010: 24). Much later, this view of having respect for people, of non-subservience to existing government, and ‘revolutions’ found clarity in the arguments presented by American Thomas Jefferson (1968: 83–93), South African Nelson Mandela (1965: 178–9), and Kenya's Mwai Kibaki. The government, Kibaki asserted, ‘is not supposed to be a burden on the people, it is not supposed to intrude on every aspect of life and it is not supposed to mount roadblocks in every direction we turn in life’ (Kibaki 2002).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.